Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion"
Anscombe, G. E. M. "Cambridge Philosophers II: Ludwig Wittgenstein." Philosophy 70, no. 273 (July 1995): 395–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s003181910006558x.
Повний текст джерелаWestergaard, Peter K. "En indledning - til Wittgensteins forelæsning om etik." Slagmark - Tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 20 (February 3, 2018): 129–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/sl.v0i20.103709.
Повний текст джерелаParsons, Laurel. "Music and Text in Elisabeth Lutyens's Wittgenstein Motet." Canadian University Music Review 20, no. 1 (May 16, 2013): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1015648ar.
Повний текст джерелаLindsay, Pete, Tim Pitt, and Owen Thomas. "Bewitched by our words: Wittgenstein, language-games, and the pictures that hold sport psychology captive." Sport & Exercise Psychology Review 10, no. 1 (March 2014): 41–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.53841/bpssepr.2014.10.1.41.
Повний текст джерелаSokolova, Elizaveta V. "Figure and Scope of Ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein in W.G. Sebald’s Austerlitz." Studia Litterarum 6, no. 2 (2021): 96–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/10.22455/2500-4247-2021-6-2-96-113.
Повний текст джерелаSokolova, Elizaveta V. "Figure and Scope of Ideas of Ludwig Wittgenstein in W.G. Sebald’s Austerlitz." Studia Litterarum 6, no. 2 (2021): 96–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2021-6-2-96-113.
Повний текст джерелаGodart-Wendling, Béatrice. "L’hypothèse de Firth." Historiographia Linguistica 41, no. 1 (June 10, 2014): 79–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.41.1.03god.
Повний текст джерелаMCGUINNESS, BRIAN. "In the shadow of Goethe: Wittgenstein's intellectual project." European Review 10, no. 4 (October 2002): 447–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1062798702000364.
Повний текст джерелаCarvalho, Marcondes Rocha. "Wittgenstein e a verdade." Investigação Filosófica 11, no. 1 (March 26, 2020): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.18468/if.2020v11n1.p19-30.
Повний текст джерелаNoara, André Renan. "Interpretação das sensações." Revista DIAPHONÍA 4, no. 2 (December 12, 2018): 63–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.48075/rd.v4i2.21315.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion"
Fronda, Earl Stanley. "Wittgenstein from a theological point of view." Thesis, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, 2007. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.683343.
Повний текст джерелаSchmezer, Gerhard. "Entre le non-sens et l'exhortation : le religieux dans la recherche de Ludwig Wittgenstein." Paris 8, 2006. http://www.theses.fr/2006PA082626.
Повний текст джерелаThis dissertation addresses the religious dimension of the life and work of Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889 1951). First of all, we demonstrate that this religious element in Wittgenstein’s thought cannot be understood in isolation from his life. Secondly, we show that their exists a close relationship between the traditional interpretations of his “religious point of view” and the history of the publication of his manuscripts. Thirdly, we sketch Wittgenstein’s religious biography, placing the various texts now available in their historical context, with the intention of reconstructing his “religious imagination”. We show how he addresses his own spiritual difficulties, dialogues with religious authors and often elucidates philosophical problems with religious examples. Finally, we examine the notion of “soul” as Wittgenstein’s describes it in his last philosophy as well as its role in post-Wittgensteinian philosophy of religion
Voizard, Alain. "Logique et langage chez Ludwig Wittgenstein." Paris 1, 1991. http://www.theses.fr/1991PA010501.
Повний текст джерелаOur belief in the possibility of a systematic theory of meaning is thwarted by l. Wittgenstein's arguments against a conception of language as calculus. Using wittgenstein's own arguments and his discusion of rule-following, we contend that the status he attributes to language forecloses the possibility of a dummettian (like) theory of meaning. If correctly interpreted, the distinction wittgenstein draws between maying and showing contributes significantly to show that an epistemological position must be the result of a correct understanding of the way our everyday language works, and not be imposed upon language. We show that this error has been made by m. Dummett
Perrin, Denis. "Temps et langage chez Ludwig Wittgenstein." Grenoble 2, 2003. http://www.theses.fr/2003GRE29027.
Повний текст джерелаCavassane, Ricardo Peraça [UNESP]. "A concepção de filosofia de Wittgenstein." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/93146.
Повний текст джерелаOs objetos desta dissertação são a concepção de filosofia de Ludwig Wittgenstein no Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus e nas Investigações Filosóficas, bem como a transformação que a concepção de filosofia de Wittgenstein sofreu do Tractatus às Investigações. Interpretaremos todos os trechos das referidas obras relevantes para os temas a serem tratados, e justificaremos nossa interpretação em dois níveis. No primeiro nível de justificação, recorreremos à interpretação de Oskari Kuusela a fim de mostrar que nossa interpretação se justifica por sua concordância com a de Kuusela, pois entendemos que Wittgenstein procura elaborar uma concepção de filosofia desprovida de teorias e, portanto, livre de dogmatismo, tendo falhado em sua primeira tentativa, no Tractatus, mas sendo bem sucedido em sua segunda tentativa, nas Investigações. No segundo nível de justificação, recorreremos às interpretações dos principais comentadores da filosofia de Wittgenstein a fim de mostrar que a interpretação de Kuusela se justifica por solucionar os problemas que as interpretações dos principais comentadores da filosofia de Wittgenstein não solucionam, uma vez que tais interpretações não são capazes de explicar como Wittgenstein falha no Tractatus e tem sucesso nas Investigações em sua empresa de conceber uma filosofia livre de dogmatismo
The objects of this dissertation are Wittgenstein’s conception of philosophy in the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus and in the Philosophical Investigations, as well as the transformation that Wittgenstein’s conception of philosophy suffered from the Tractatus to the Investigations. We will interpret every passage of the referred works relevant to the subjects to be treated, and we will justify our interpretation in two levels. At the first level of justification, we will appeal to the interpretation of Oskari Kuusela in order to show that our interpretation is justified by its agreement with Kuusela’s, because we understand that Wittgenstein seeks to elaborate a conception of philosophy devoid of theories and, therefore, free of dogmatism, having failed in his first attempt, in the Tractatus, but succeeding in his second attempt, in the Investigations. At the second level of justification, we will appeal to the interpretations of the main commentators of Wittgenstein’s philosophy in order to show that Kuusela’s interpretation is justified by solving the problems that the interpretations of the main commentators of Wittgenstein’s philosophy do not solve, once that such interpretations are not able to explain how Wittgenstein fails in the Tractatus and succeeds in the Investigations in his enterprise of conceiving a philosophy free of dogmatism
Letourneur, Jérôme. "Du paradigme album à la recherche conceptuelle : connaissance, esthétique et synopticité chez Ludwig Wittgenstein." Paris 8, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA083996.
Повний текст джерела“This thesis sheds light on the aspect change of Wittgensteinian research between the Philosophical Investigations as being in the ‘grip of stress’ due to incomprehension, contrasted with Wittgenstein’s album linked to comprehension of it, positioned as resulting in a conceptual investigation on blindness to aspect and aspect change. The grip of stress is itself an aspect. This conceptual investigation was inaugurated at the juncture where the Philosophical Investigations critical-genetic edition situated the end of the work in 2001. We demonstrate that the question of aspects, their change and blindness to it were already present in Wittgenstein’s earlier manuscripts. On this basis, we describe how the incomprehension the Philosophical Investigations manifest, contradicts any call for insertability of complementary material in the work that would freeze its form. Rather, by the relationship of comprehension of this incomprehension, called “Album”, to the way of seeing things that constitutes surveyability, we show, by the translation and connection of the Philosophical Investigations to the conceptual research milestones, the bias through which the work inserts itself in the study of Wittgenstein on aspect change and blindness to it. We argue that the relationship of progressive change in language to the true discovery that constitutes a synoptic way out of philosophy enables us via this conceptual research to renew the manner of seeing the relations of the condition of language to those of philosophy through its aesthetics. It thus offers an alternative dynamic to the static conception of surveyability after which the oeuvre is hierarchised today. This is an alternative that now should be transcribed in the electronic edition of Wittgensteins’s literary estate (Nachlass). ”
Sekino, Tetsuya. "Peut-on parler de Dieu aujourd'hui ? : De Wittgenstein à simone weil." Thesis, Lyon, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3024/document.
Повний текст джерелаWe are consciously or unconsciously influenced by scientism and logical positivism. So we asked a question: Can we speak of God today? To answer the question, we focus on two philosophers, Wittgenstein and Simone Weil. According to Wittgenstein, “Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent.” What he means by that is not that God doesn’t exist or that God is not intelligible as say scientism and logical positivism. What he means by that is that God does exist, but we can’t talk about him because of the limits of our language. But the lack of Wittgenstein is to look away from religious or metaphysical intelligibility. As for Simone Weil, she speaks of God in her writings and letters. What allows her to speak of God? This is our first point of interest. And our second point of interest is to define the mystical experience of Simone Weil, because the use of the word “mystical” in studies of Weil is rather arbitrary. Our third point of interest is to highlight the relationship between “non-reading” and intuition in Simone Weil. Our fourth point of interest is to explore the relationship between Zen Buddhism and the thought of Simone Weil. Through studying them, we will answer this question and, through Weil’s concept of intuition, we propose a worldview that is different from scientism and from logical positivism
Rogue, Évelyne. "Wittgenstein et l'esthétique : mise en perspective des différents points de vue." Paris 1, 1995. http://www.theses.fr/1995PA010568.
Повний текст джерелаIn this thesis, entitled wittgenstein and aesthetics, we intend to show that it is impossible to define the conept of the beautiful, on which traditional aesthetics is based; a theory advocated by wittgenstein. For him, the "beautiful" is an indefinable concept, because of the many uses that we make of it. Thus, he concludes that aesthetics is inexpressible, in the same way as ethics is unspeakable. We don't agree with wittgenstein's conclusion, and we think that his philosophy is not a philosophy of pure language, but a philologology. However, for him, the aesthetics is not condemned to the absolute silence, for "it has to give reasons". But, this argument is blurred and very discutable, since "to give reasons" means to understand the artist's intentions, which is very difficult, perhaps impossible. . . Thus, for wittgenstein, aesthetics is expressible in the form of reactions. It supposes a capacity to appreciate correct manner and a good knowledge of rules, or "feeling of the rules". In our opinion , if wittgenstein was right in insisting on the socioculturalcontext, on which a work of art is founded, we prefer ro substitute aesthetics of implementation to traditional aesthetics. So, analytic esthetics is contrasted to pragmatic aesthetics. And when it is necessary to appreciate works of contemporary art, the spectator becomes an actor, elsewhere, aestheticians and
Achondo, Parra Mayarí. "La terapia filosófica en el Tractatus logico-philosophicus y en las investigaciones filosóficas de Ludwig Wittgenstein." Tesis, Universidad de Chile, 2016. http://repositorio.uchile.cl/handle/2250/143302.
Повний текст джерелаPASSERIEU, DIT JEAN MARC. "Wittgenstein et l'idee de culture." Paris 1, 1996. http://www.theses.fr/1996PA010563.
Повний текст джерела1) conceptual views : this work fulfils two philosophical requirements. A) to describe how the concept of culture is internally connected with the fundamental conceptuality of w's philosophy (in each one of his socalled "periods"); to show the normative relevance of culture in the philosophical use of "sprache", "grammatik", "sprachspiel", "lebensform"; b) from a more general point of view, the second requirement consists of the clarification of all possible hermeneutics and theory of values. Following the w's insight of culture and civilization. 2) methodology : after a critical investigation of the w's legend in our cultural landscape, our first part shows the way w rejects the theoretical conceptions of culture and the world views; a grammatical study of the philosophical language games of culture replaces w inside the historical development of philosophy and anthropology. The second part describes the complex evolution of his inquiry and the role of culture. 3) conclusions a specific continuity links the "logical" problematics to the "language game's one. W's "pragmatic" point of view is as far as from empiricism as from transcendental philosophy or "lebensphilosophie". Against nihilism and relativism, the logic of certainty is founded on acts and faith
Книги з теми "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion"
1970-, Pandey K. C., ed. Ludwig Wittgenstein: Ethics and religion. Jaipur: Rawat Publications, 2008.
Знайти повний текст джерелаKross, Matthias. Klarheit als Selbstzweck: Wittgenstein über Philosophie, Religion, Ethik und Gewissheit. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1993.
Знайти повний текст джерелаWittgenstein and religion. New York, N.Y: St. Martin's Press, 1993.
Знайти повний текст джерелаReligion within the limits of language alone: Wittgenstein on philosophy and religion. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate, 2001.
Знайти повний текст джерелаAn introduction to Wittgenstein's philosophy of religion. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
Знайти повний текст джерелаZ, Phillips D. Wittgenstein and religion. New York, N.Y: St. Martin's Press, 1993.
Знайти повний текст джерелаZ, Phillips D. Wittgenstein and religion. London: Macmillan, 1993.
Знайти повний текст джерелаLabron, Tim. Wittgenstein's religious point of view. London: Bloomsbury Academia, 2013.
Знайти повний текст джерелаWittgenstein and theology. London: T & T Clark, 2009.
Знайти повний текст джерелаWittgenstein's (misunderstood) religious thought. Leiden: Brill, 2010.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion"
Howard, Alex. "Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)." In Philosophy for Counselling and Psychotherapy, 313–26. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04644-4_30.
Повний текст джерелаvon Savigny, Eike. "Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1889–1951)." In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 611–15. Elsevier, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.61137-6.
Повний текст джерелаvon Savigny, E. "Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1889–1951)." In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 16517–22. Elsevier, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/00350-8.
Повний текст джерелаBURBULES, NICHOLAS C., and MICHAEL PETERS. "LUDWIG WITTGENSTEIN 1889–1951." In Fifty Modern Thinkers on Education, 15–23. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203464694-4.
Повний текст джерела"Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)." In Sprachphilosophie / Philosophy of Language / La philosophie du langage, edited by Marcelo Dascal, Dietfried Gerhardus, Kuno Lorenz, and Georg Meggle. Berlin • New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110095838.1.2.563.
Повний текст джерелаFlesch, William. "Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)." In Edinburgh Encyclopaedia of Modern Criticism and Theory, 120–26. Edinburgh University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780748672554-016.
Повний текст джерелаFlesch, William. "Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)." In Introducing Literary Theories, 120–26. Edinburgh University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781474473637-016.
Повний текст джерелаHalpern, Catherine. "Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951)." In Les grands penseurs des Sciences Humaines, 55–58. Éditions Sciences Humaines, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/sh.journ.2016.01.0055.
Повний текст джерела"WITTGENSTEIN, LUDWIG (1889–1951)." In Cultural Theory: The Key Thinkers, 227–30. Routledge, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203996423-87.
Повний текст джерелаKompridis, Nikolas. "Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)." In The Cambridge Habermas Lexicon, 709–11. Cambridge University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316771303.206.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Wittgenstein, Ludwig, 1889-1951 – Religion"
Lozev, Kamen. "Tolstoy’s religious influence on young Wittgenstein". У 130 years Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-2019). Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-book.001.12.
Повний текст джерела