Готові списки джерел за темами / Vivisector

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Vivisector"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 10 грудня 2022
Оновлено: 28 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Зміст

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Vivisector".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Vivisector"

1

Straley, Jessica. "Love and Vivisection: Wilkie Collins's Experiment in Heart and Science." Nineteenth-Century Literature 65, no. 3 (December 1, 2010): 348–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ncl.2010.65.3.348.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Jessica Straley, "Love and Vivisection: Wilkie Collins's Experiment in Heart and Science"(pp. 348––373) This essay examines the paradox of Wilkie Collins's antivivisection sensation novel, Heart and Science (1883). in the plot of the cruel vivisector Dr. Benjulia and the helpless young woman who almost becomes his latest experiment, the novel draws from a familiar bounty of antivivisectionist propaganda, but, this essay argues, the novel also reveals Collins's thinking about his own literary genre and the unfavorable comparison many critics were making between vivisection and sensation fiction: medical experiments on live animals often electrified their subjects, and sensation novels likewise shocked their readers. More than simply a metaphor, this connection between scientific and literary practices pointed to a late-Victorian anxiety about physiological sensation and moral reasoning. The focus on the body, critics of both practices maintained, bypassed the authority of the soul and turned human agents into passive receptors incapable of the higher functions of rationality and ethics. In its preface, Heart and Science disavows any relation between its narration and the medical dissection it deplores, and much of the novel progresses without the sensation genre's characteristic shocks. But Collins's text also seeks to recover and to redeem physiology as the basis for human emotion and ethics and, in so doing, to redefine sensation fiction as an aid, rather than an inhibitor, to moral agency.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Sicard-Cowan, Hélène. "La Critique et le dépassement de la « méthode expérimentale » dans Thérèse Raquin." Nottingham French Studies 60, no. 3 (December 2021): 347–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/nfs.2021.0330.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article makes the case for reading Zola’s protagonists Laurent and Thérèse as literary foils for one of the founding fathers of the experimental method, namely the physiologist Claude Bernard, and his wife, Fanny Martin. Drawing more particularly on elements from Bernard’s and Martin’s lives, as well as Bernard’s scientific writings, the article shows that Zola ‘performs’ two grueling experiments in the aforementioned novel: the first one, initiated by the author himself, results in the death of three protagonists and the paralysis of the fourth one; the second experiment, initiated by Laurent, reveals that the latter’s evaluation of Thérèse and his ensuing hypothesis are seriously flawed. In fact, Laurent’s gaze is marred by his tendency to ‘dirty’ nature (‘salir la nature,’ to borrow Zola’s expression), and his experiment doesn’t turn out the way he had originally planned, as both lovers turned murderers end up committing suicide together. This article thus argues that, in Thérèse Raquin, Zola resorts to critical posturing as a vivisector in a text that can be read as a revenge narrative which gestures towards the possibility for vivisectors to be ‘redeemed’ as individuals made fully capable of feeling compassion for their objects through angelic intervention.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Chernin, Eli. "An Artificial Heart Revives a Corpse: Sir Ronald Ross's Unpublished Story of 1882, "The Vivisector Vivisected"." Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 31, no. 3 (1988): 341–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pbm.1988.0027.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Holzapfel, Amy Strahler. "Strindberg as Vivisector: Physiology, Pathology, and Anti-Mimesis inThe FatherandMiss Julie." Modern Drama 51, no. 3 (September 2008): 329–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/md.51.3.329.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Moon, Lawrence. "Why we need rats: What it is like to use animals in neurobiological research in the UK?" Biochemist 30, no. 5 (October 1, 2008): 30–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1042/bio03005030.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
I'm a big fan of rodents. As a kid, I had two pet mice (called Pip and Marty). As a teenager, I had four Russian dwarf hamsters (Sex, Drugs, Rock and Roll) and, as a student, I had a couple of piebald rats (Chicken and Noodle). Now, as a neuroscientist at a UK university, I have a colony of rats with numbers instead of names. It's a dilemma that many researchers face: how to reconcile their empathy with animals with their desire to develop safe and effective therapies for diseases or injuries. It is ethically challenging: for 7 years, I was simultaneously a vegetarian and vivisector.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Cooper, Katherine R. "‘My Cruel Conscience with Sharpned Knife’: Conscience as Vessel and Vivisector inJacob’s Welland aMeditation of a Penitent Sinner." Exemplaria 24, no. 1-2 (April 2012): 12–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/1041257311z.0000000002.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Rodney Stenning Edgecombe. "Hugo, Goethe, and Patrick White: Sources for The Eye of the Storm and The Vivisector." Antipodes 28, no. 2 (2014): 513. http://dx.doi.org/10.13110/antipodes.28.2.0513.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Walker, Alyssa Chen. "Bringing the Laboratory Dog Home." Humanimalia 4, no. 2 (February 4, 2013): 101–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.52537/humanimalia.9995.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This essay considers the role of popular fiction in the vivisection debates of the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Specifically, it argues that the fictional narratives of American author Elizabeth Stuart Phelps (a vociferous proponent of humane reform in New England) infused the anti-vivisection movement with a sense of urgency. By exploiting the formal properties of the novel, Phelps encouraged readers to reimagine the anonymous laboratory dog both as a surrogate child and as private property. In doing so, her imaginative literature illustrated, in ways that other discursive forms did not, how vivisection corroded fin de siècle America’s most sacrosanct values.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Page, Tony. "From Morality to Medical Danger: Antivivisectionism in the Novels of Three Latevictorian/Early 20th-Century Writers." MANUSYA 18, no. 1 (2015): 93–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/26659077-01801005.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The trajectory of the ideological-literary anti-vivisection movement is traced across three successive English novels (by Wilkie Collins, Gertrude Colmore, and Walter Hadwen) and shown first to be moralitycentred and character-focussed in its directionality, but increasingly moving towards scientific exposure of the practice as methodologically flawed and dangerously misleading for the human patient. This movement of narrowing focus upon the medical perils of vivisection is shown to reach its culmination in the medical historiography of novelist Hans Ruesch, who abjures formal novel-writing but retains rhetorical and literary styles and devices in his presentation of the vivisection issue.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Abbott, William M. "The British Catholic debate over vivisection, 1876 – 1914: a common theology but differing applications." British Catholic History 34, no. 03 (April 12, 2019): 451–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/bch.2019.5.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article analyses the motives behind the conflicting positions taken by Victorian Roman Catholics over the issue of vivisection. Catholics defended or attacked vivisection for widely varying reasons; there were less two schools of thought than a mosaic of arguments from which to choose. While there was substantial agreement over basic theological principles, the application of those principles to the vivisection debate varied depending upon the writer’s social, political, and scientific attitudes, which in turn were affected by professional occupation. The debate included laypeople as well as clerics, with some of the former affirming a more liberal and less theologically rigorous approach to animal rights.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Vivisector"

1

Mingay, Philip Frederick James. "Vivisectors and the vivisected, the painter figure in the postcolonial novel." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2001. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp04/NQ60328.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Montgomery, Brooke. "Those candid and ingenuous vivisectors, Frances Power Cobbe and the anti-vivisection controversy in Victorian Britain, 1870-1904." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp01/MQ55275.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Levitt, Gail Ann. "Four cultural influences on anti-vivisection propaganda literature, 1875-1910." Thesis, University of Exeter, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.403195.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Halverson, Kristin. "Physiological Cruelty? : Discussing and Developing Vivisection in Great Britain, 1875-1901." Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för historia och samtidsstudier, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-30336.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis examines the development of vivisection as a method of physiological research between 1875 and 1901 in Great Britain, by examining some of the arguments, discussions, and ideas put forth by physiologists for the utilisation of vivisection in their research. Because this study operates within the context of medical history, questions of legitimacy, scientific development, and professional image are lifted. The development of vivisection during this period took place with a larger shift in scientific practice playing out in the background, where experimentalism began overtaking the previously more analytical approach to medicine and the sciences. The First Royal Commission on Vivisection in 1875 marks the beginning of this study, and the discussions within allow for a more nuanced picture of the professional debates on the practice, where both proponents and sceptics at times found common ground. Technological and societal aspects were central to much of the argumentation for the further development of vivisection, with technology easing the practical aspects of the method, and the concept of the "gentleman" allowing British "vivisectors" to argue against charges of cruelty, pointing rather to continental schools of physiology as the culprits, whilst lifting the "humanity" behind animal experimentation in Great Britain. In conjunction with pointing out the importance of the method for the development of medical science, the Cruelty to Animals Act and the lobbying on behalf of the professional journals British Medical Journal and The Lancet helped legitimise the practice in Great Britain. The Act allowed vivisection under set circumstances, and the two journals served as megaphones for scientific development on behalf of vivisection, at times even openly criticising sceptical opinions. At the same time, some saw experimental research through vivisection as merely one aspect of medical practice. One which needed to gain foothold in order to help advance medical science for the larger benefit of all humanity.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Loveridge, Ann. "Historical, fictional and illustrative readings of the vivisected body, 1873-1913." Thesis, Canterbury Christ Church University, 2017. http://create.canterbury.ac.uk/16756/.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis analyses why the practice of vivisection captured the imagination of a small section of late-Victorian society, and how these individuals articulated their concerns. By adopting an interdisciplinary approach, this study brings together the texts of both anti and pro-vivisectionists to place literary texts alongside medical textbooks and illustrations, essays and campaigning leaflets to suggest a representation of the vivisector throughout the different texts assembled. The first chapter explores the interaction, in print, between activist Frances Power Cobbe and physiologist, Elie de Cyon alongside the ways in which the antivivisectionists used images of vivisected animals, sourced from scientific manuals, to assist in constructing the movement’s identity. The second chapter analyses the lecture notes of two young medical students published as The Shambles of Science (1903) and how the authors strived to secure a literary representation for pain. These findings will then pave the way for an examination of how anti-vivisection rhetoric influenced fiction. The next chapter is concerned with the relationship between the ‘heart’ and ‘science’ and considers the more positive outcomes for those existing on the periphery of scientific experimentation. The fourth chapter examines the relationship between vivisection and hydrophobia, while simultaneously considering the implications of nurturing the young vivisector. The final chapter examines how the signature of the vivisectionist can be read through the incisions made on the surface of the opened body. By delving into these interactive, textual and imaginative bodies, this chapter explores the ways in which the vivisected body, traced by the scalpel and relayed by the instrumentation of the laboratory became a literary object.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Kluveld-Reijerse, Amanda Alwien. "Reis door de hel der onschuldigen de expressieve politiek van de Nederlandse anti-vivisectionisten, 1890-1940 /." [Maastricht : Maastricht : Universiteit Maastricht] ; University Library, Maastricht University [Host], 1999. http://arno.unimaas.nl/show.cgi?fid=6873.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Bory, Jean-Yves. "Science et patience : la polémique sur la vivisection au XIXe siècle en France." Paris, EHESS, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010EHES0128.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Cette thèse étudie la pratique de la vivisection au XIXe siècle en France et les polémiques qu'elle a engendrées. La vivisection, action de découper l'animal vivant dans un but scientifique, s'est imposée comme pratique scientifique professionnelle et même comme paradigme. En 1880 le paradigme était installé et institutionnalisé. Les protestations ont existé d'abord dans les milieux scientifiques, puis chez les médecins publicistes, les protecteurs des animaux et enfin dans le grand public organisé en associations. Elles ont culminé au début des années 1880 mais le mouvement antivivisectionniste a été anéanti par la polémique sur la rage. Il a resurgi vers 1900 et a été stoppé par la guerre. Deux sortes de vivisecteurs peuvent être distinguées: les extrémistes, partisans de la liberté totale d'usage des animaux, et les modérés, appelant à une retenue. Les extrémistes ont remporté une victoire totale grâce à des facteurs sociaux, culturels et politiques plutôt que scientifiques. Les antivivisectionnistes faisaient partie d'un autre paradigme, opposé à celui des vivisecteurs sur la question de la douleur animale, et non sur la science. La polémique sur la vivisection fut un affrontement de valeurs
This thesis is about vivisection and his controversies in XIXth French century. Vivisection action of cutting animals in scientific purpose, became a professional practice and a paradigm during XIXth century. The paradigm was established in 1880. First protests were in scientific community, next in medicine publications, at the protectors of animals, finally in organized associations. Antivivisectionist movement reached its peak in early 1880 but disappeared because the controversy about. Rabies. It come back toward 1900. There were two kinds of vivisectors: extremists, who claimed total liberty in the use of animals, and moderates who wanted a limitation. Extremists have won because social, cultural and politic factors rather than scientific ones. Antivivisectionists were from another paradigm, opposed to vivisectors about animal suffering and not about scientific considerations. Controversy about vivisection was about values
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

McPherson, Neil G. "Destabilising the discourse of vivisection : a Foucauldian archaeology/genealogy of human/nonhuman animal association." Thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.517688.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Building on the theoretical/methodological approach to history and historical investigation evident in the work of Michel Foucault, the thesis takes the form of an archaeology/genealogy of human/nonhuman animal association, placing a particular focus on the practice of vivisection. The first chapter examines the theoretical/methodological approach taken by Foucault in his archaeological and genealogical analyses. It outlines the theoretical and methodological tools that Foucault provides, and locates the research within a coherent analytical framework consistent with a Foucauldian analysis. Chapters two, three and four constitute an archaeological investigation of the way in which the human/nonhuman animal relationship has been constructed in the Western world within the conditions of possibility of knowledge in the Renaissance, Classical and Modem ages. The historical a priori conditions of the three epistemic formations are examined and the construction of the association between man and the nonhuman animal and the practice of vivisection is considered within each. Chapter five develops the archaeological investigation of the historical formation of human/nonhuman animal association and the practice of vivisection by using Foucault's genealogy of the Modem penal system as a backdrop to a genealogical analysis of the dispotif of Modem vIvIsection. The historical discourse that locates the human/nonhuman relationship within a progressivist construct of humanist reform and rational scientific development is disturbed and the historicised justification for the use of the nonhuman animal in the practice of vivisection undermined through the decentring of man as the foundational freethinking subject of knowledge. The thesis shows that the contemporary historical discourse surrounding human/nonhuman animal association and the practice of vivisection can be rethought and reconstructed by considering it within an analytical construct liberated from the transcendento-empirical constraints of conventional history. This discourse, which legitimises the practice of nonhuman animal vivisection as a result of its apparent potential to advance medicine's ability to cure disease, is destabilised, and a counter memory constructed that identifies vivisection as a mechanism of surveillance used to discipline the human population. As such, the thesis constitutes an alternative history of human/nonhuman animal association and the practice of vivisection, one that allows them to be spoken of and thought of in a different way. The counter memory produced opens up a space from which political resistance to the contemporary practice of vivisection can emerge, free from the anthropological constraints of the Modern age.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Shmuely, Shira Dina. "The bureaucracy of empathy : vivisection and the question of animal pain in Britain, 1876-1912." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113945.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thesis: Ph. D. in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTS), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Science, Technology and Society, 2017.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 309-328).
This dissertation examines the mutually reinforcing connections between science and law and their construction of pain in British regulation of animal experimentation. It investigates the Home Office's implementation of the Cruelty to Animals Act (1876), the first effort anywhere in the world to impose legal restrictions on vivisection, during the three decades following its enactment. The study ends in 1912 with the findings of a second Royal Commission that evaluated the workings of the Act. The Commission reaffirmed many of the Home Office polices regarding vivisection and their underlying premises. The Act mandated official supervision of scientific experiments that "calculated to give pain" to animal subjects. Implementing the Act therefore necessitated the identification and quantification of pain. This requirement created what I term the "bureaucracy of empathy," an attempt to systemize the understanding of animal suffering through administrative mechanisms. Practicing empathy was integral to some bureaucratic tasks, for example, attaching the right certificate to an inoculation experiment. Additionally, various factors including legal settings and scientific knowledge informed and situated this empathy with animals, when, for instance, an inspector drafted a report about mutilated monkeys while visiting a physiology laboratory. My analysis unravels that defining animal pain was often intertwined with the definition of an experiment. Law and science co-constitution of pain and experiments conditioned both the daily work of administering the law and the practices of experimenters. This dynamic led to the adoption of technologies such as anesthesia and pain scoring models, which provided legal-medical means to control pain in research and to ostensibly create a cruelty free experimental fact. A new pain-based ethical order was established, designed by law officers, civil servants, and court judges as much as by physiologists, remaking the relationships between experimenters, state representatives, and laboratory animals.
by Shira Dina Shmuely.
Ph. D. in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTS)
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Dirke, Karin. "De värnlösas vänner : [den svenska djurskyddsrörelsen 1875-1920]." Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Avdelningen för idéhistoria, 2000. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-81144.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The subject of this thesis is the Swedish animal welfare movement, its origin and early development 1875-1920. The first national Swedish animal welfare society was formed in Stockholm 1875. It was soon followed by other associations for the protection of animals. The animal welfare movement grew rapidly in Sweden. Not until towards the 1920s did the membership decline. The material studied in this thesis consists of a broad variety of documents from the animal welfare societies, such as journals and books as well as children's stories and parliamentary publications. The aim is to study both the origins and early development in Sweden of societies for the protection of animals, wild and domestic, during the decades around the turn of the century. The Swedish debates on animal welfare laws are of interest as well as discussions about vivisection and slaughter. The aim is to provide a wider analysis by taking various ideas and groups of people, such as veterinarians, schoolteachers and women into account.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Vivisector"

1

Patrick, White. Vivisector. London: Vintage, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

The vivisector. New York: Penguin Books, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

White, Patrick. The Vivisector. New York: Penguin USA, Inc., 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Patrick, White. The vivisector. London: Penguin, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Vivisect. Kalamazoo, Mich: New Issues Poetry & Prose, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Lewis, Lisa. Vivisect. Kalamazoo, Mich: New Issues Poetry & Prose, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

A, Rupke Nicolaas, ed. Vivisection in historical perspective. London: Routledge, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Covino, Joseph. Lab animal abuse: Vivisection exposed! Berkeley, CA: New Humanity Press, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Bochaca, Joaquín. La vivisección, crimen inútil. Barcelona: Nothung, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Dissection and vivisection in the European Renaissance. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Vivisector"

1

Gaile, Andreas. "White, Patrick: The Vivisector." In Kindlers Literatur Lexikon (KLL), 1–2. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05728-0_17371-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Hornsby, Asha. "Vivisection." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Victorian Women's Writing, 1–5. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02721-6_434-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Durey, Jill Felicity. "Vivisection." In John Galsworthy’s Compassion, 209–38. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87436-0_9.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Hornsby, Asha. "Vivisection." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Victorian Women’s Writing, 1661–65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78318-1_434.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Guerrini, Anita. "Vivisection 1500–1800." In Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences, 1–6. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20791-9_315-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Guerrini, Anita. "Vivisection 1500–1800." In Encyclopedia of Early Modern Philosophy and the Sciences, 2148–54. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31069-5_315.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

ten Have, Henk, and Maria do Céu Patrão Neves. "Vivisection (See Animal Ethics; Animal Research)." In Dictionary of Global Bioethics, 1041. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54161-3_514.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Bates, A. W. H. "The National Anti-Vivisection Hospital, 1902–1935." In Anti-Vivisection and the Profession of Medicine in Britain, 99–132. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55697-4_5.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Kontou, Tatiana, Victoria Mills, and Kate Nichols. "‘The New Photography: Will it Stop Vivisection?’." In Victorian Material Culture, 559–62. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315400266-185.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Bates, A. W. H. "Introduction." In Anti-Vivisection and the Profession of Medicine in Britain, 1–12. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55697-4_1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Vivisector"

1

Cassou-Nogues, Pierre. "Knife in hand: Science and vivisection in Norbert Wiener's autobiography and short fiction." In 2014 IEEE Conference on Norbert Wiener in the 21st Century (21CW). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/norbert.2014.6893935.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Lämmel, Ralf, and Ekaterina Pek. "Vivisection of a Non-Executable, Domain-Specific Language - Understanding (the Usage of) the P3P Language." In 2010 IEEE 18th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icpc.2010.45.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Tavoletta, Concetta. "Luigi Cosenza, Bernard Rudofsky and Gio Ponti and the Secret of the Mediterranean Sea." In 4th International Conference of Contemporary Affairs in Architecture and Urbanism – Full book proceedings of ICCAUA2020, 20-21 May 2021. Alanya Hamdullah Emin Paşa University, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.38027/iccaua2021186n6.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Landscape, cavity, courtyard, skin, pergola are some of the elements of the Mediterranean abacus that architecture tries to transfigure into a single substance but also as a derivation of a great mother, the Mediterranean Sea. However, we can suppose that all these elements come from an idea that acts as a trait d'union, an intuition that made the domestic space of the Mare Nostrum the place of the myth of living: the innovative idea of horizon summarized as the ability of the gaze to observe outward. Gio Ponti, Bernard Rudofsky and Luigi Cosenza are the architects of the materialization of this idea where the horizon is not only found in the relationship with the landscape but is present within the domestic space. In this space full of symbolism and origin, three houses are a body to be vivisected and rediscovered. Casa per Positano... and other shores, Hotel San Michele in Capri, Casa a Procida become autoptic and utopian spaces from which to steal the secret of the Mediterranean Sea.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Vivisector" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах Дисертації Книги
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії