Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities":
Bovend’Eert, Paul P. T. "Judicial Independence and Separation of Powers: A Case Study in Modern Court Management." European Public Law 22, Issue 2 (April 1, 2016): 333–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/euro2016021.
Olszanowski, Jan. "Model of Supervision over Administrative Courts in Poland." Bratislava Law Review 4, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 173–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.46282/blr.2020.4.2.195.
Evloev, I. M. "The Legal Nature of the Judicial Compliance Assessment." Siberian Law Herald 1 (2021): 8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.26516/2071-8136.2021.1.8.
Golovko, V. V., and Yu A. Seliverstova. "Seliverstova Yu.A. Administration process and administrative proceedings: problems and future." Law Enforcement Review 8, no. 2 (June 22, 2024): 112–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2024.8(2).112-119.
Wang, Haijun. "Practical requirements and institutional changes in the action of the judiciary during the transition period in Russia." Legal Science in China and Russia, no. 4 (September 16, 2021): 118–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2587-9723.2021.4.118-125.
Fox-Decent, Evan. "Democratizing Common Law Constitutionalism." McGill Law Journal 55, no. 3 (February 10, 2011): 511–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1000622ar.
Issalys, Pierre. "Regards sur le droit administratif suisse." Les Cahiers de droit 19, no. 3 (April 12, 2005): 703–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/042262ar.
Lee, Chang-On. "A Critical Review on the Separation Theory of Investigation and Prosecution: Focusing on comparative legal perspective." Korean Association of Criminal Procedure Law 14, no. 2 (June 30, 2022): 35–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.34222/kdps.2022.14.2.35.
Bródka, Jakub. "Analiza uprawnień i wzajemnej relacji organów nadzorczych nad komornikiem sądowym oraz charakter jego odpowiedzialności dyscyplinarnej – zarys problemu." Przegląd Prawa Egzekucyjnego 2023, no. 7 (July 28, 2023): 35–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.62627/ppe.2023.026.
Слинько, Д. В., and Л. І. Калєніченко. "Development of National Procedural Law in the Second Half of the XIX – Early XX Centuries." Law and Safety 80, no. 1 (March 19, 2021): 156–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.32631/pb.2021.1.22.
Дисертації з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities":
Djedje, Zako Jean-Marie. "La dualité juridictionnelle en Afrique subsaharienne francophone : analyse d'un modèle importé à partir des exemples burkinabè, gabonais, ivoirien et sénégalais." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université de Lille (2022-....), 2022. https://pepite-depot.univ-lille.fr/ToutIDP/EDSJPG/2022/2022ULILD004.pdf.
Between the rejections, the partial implementation and aborted implementation, the reforms regulating the juridic duality illustrate the feeling that they do not function well but as purely symbolic or, somehow, as they indicate a process not grasped well. Accordingly, the transition from monism to juridic duality does not lead to a serious development of the administrative issue qualitatively and quantitatively in the francophone African countries. Presumably, if the process of duality can be accommodated, it would not lead to its systematic condemnation. The increasing uniqueness of the collectivities' territorial issues, the urbanism, the environmental issues as well as the attraction of African wealth leading to a kind of “scramble” of investors and powerful stranger forces do not ask for the only specialization of the administrative jurisdiction. Its independence and autonomy are now necessary in order to fully meet the new and renewed challenges. Nevertheless, we must distinguish the incompatible properties in the French imported model from the efficient coaching of the administrative action in francophone Africa and the incongruences of the reforms regulating this model. Briefly, the scope, the context and the accommodating environment of the juridic duality should be re-examined, reassessed in order to create an administrative law both faithful to the principles useful to its efficiency and reflecting the sociological features of new area
Künnecke, Martina. "Towards similar standards of judicial protection against administrative action in England and Germany? : a comparison of judicial review of administrative action and the liability of public authorities under the influence of European laws." Thesis, University of Hull, 2002. http://hydra.hull.ac.uk/resources/hull:8314.
Defoort, Benjamin. "La décision administrative." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020097.
One of the most characteristic expression of the administrative activities, the administrative decision is a familiar concept. Nevertheless, positive law on this subject turns out to be disparate and contingent. And behind a seeming consensus, the authors pre-sent the unilateral administrative actions with real terminological and conceptual disparities. The choice has been made to build a definition, from a critical analysis of positive law and doctrinal views, so as to test its merits with an eye to a better understanding of the Admin-istration and its law. Imperative meaning of a fixed and unilateral act of will of an adminis-trative body, the administrative decision is a useful tool to analyse the power of the Admin-istration, the judicial review of it and the place that citizens can aspire to in the process of its making and its implementation. Distinct from incitation or mere declaration of intent, deci-sion remains the preferred way of directing citizens behaviour and the main object of the judicial review of administrative acts. The explanatory impact of this definition is supple-mented by the understanding it enables of the strategical uses that actors of administrative law make of it. As a meaning, decision reveals the struggles they wage to identify, in a specif-ic case, the impact of the various acts of administrative bodies ; as a power issue, it brings out the strategies of legitimization that surround its use par public authorities
Sengupta, Arghya. "Independence and accountability of the Indian higher judiciary." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2014. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d16c344d-ba44-454f-9606-456b8524071e.
Jouffroy, Bruno. "Les prérogatives de puissance publique." Thesis, La Rochelle, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012LAROD030.
At a time when administrative law has become « common place », it is with a renewed interest that one should to ponder about the specificity of this law, its outrageousness. The prerogatives of the public authorities are at the heart of this issue. Our study will show that the prerogatives of the public authorities are within the scope of the functional notions. However, despite our research, we cannot firmly assert that the prerogatives of the public authorities are a conceptual notion. No general criteria can define these prerogatives as they are diffused and contingent. They do not have an abstractly determined content once for all. Their content changes with the evolution of administrative law. We can, however, try to give a definition as a basis, that is to say a definition which would gather a majority of prerogatives, without including them all. The prerogatives of the public authorities would then be defined, for most of them – concept of hard core – and not in their totality, as outrageous means of action or of protection of the ordinary law, resulting from the public authorities, held by a person in charge of administrative action so as to satisfy the general interest. Yet, this definition as a basis contains some inaccuracies. That is why the prerogatives then are not a conceptual notion in their totality
Ghandour, Bertille. "Le traitement judiciaire des entreprises en difficulté." Thesis, Lille 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016LIL20025.
Traditionally, insolvency law appeals to the judicial authority to apply its provisions and to carry out its aims. However, regarding the evolution of this law, the exclusive judicial treatment of the difficulties is challenged. Indeed, it is no longer only to punish but more to prevent difficulties and safeguard businesses, which distorts the judicial office of the judge. In addition, traders are not the only ones affected by this law, leading to the outbreak of jurisdiction. Subsequently, there is a need to consider other modes of treatment. Taking into account the existence of an administrative process, known by over-indebtedness, but also by businesses, and promoting alternative dispute resolution of difficulties, another path can be proposed for the management of the economic impossibility of performance. The legitimacy of the judge, whose interventions would be refocused and skills specialised, would be strengthened in relation to the treatment of undertakings facing difficulties
Banhos, Sérgio Silveira. "Discricionariedade e princípios na hipermodernidade." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2007. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/7555.
This thesis addresses the recent doctrinal and jurisprudential tendency observed in the law in the context of hypermodernity, which indicates an effective reduction in the use of discretionality in administrative acts as a result of the integrated ap-plication of principles and rules. The traditional legalistic approach is currently giv-ing way to a more wide-ranging view, exemplified in Ronald Dworkin s theory of law as integrity through which not only rules, but also principles themselves, should be subjected to a systemic, integrated analysis. Given this, Dworkin s work forms the theoretical platform for the questions raised by this entire study, since the integrated application of principles and rules has become fundamental in the pursuit of the ideal of justice, bringing a new focus on the role of administrative law in an environment of deep and rapid change that typifies hypermodernity. Consid-ering the new concept of the separation of powers, the notion of strict legality, by presupposing a means of controlling the exercise of State power, must be set against other constitutional principles of equal importance, taking into account the particularities of each case in question. In this context, the traditional concept of discretionality is outmoded. Jurisdictive control of these acts is not only possible, but also absolutely essential in a democratic state of law. The synthesis of this new paradigm for administrative law is clear and should be an indissoluble part of administators agenda in contemporary society: citizens are the effective benefici-aries of constitutional rights and guarantees. The technique of balancing principles by assessing their values in the particular case is already part of the jurisprudence of hypermodernity, which is in synchrony with neopositivism and the theory of law as integrity
Esta dissertação demonstra a recente tendência doutrinária e jurisprudencial ob-servada no Direito da hipermodernidade, que indica efetiva diminuição da parcela de discricionariedade nos atos da Administração Pública, a partir da aplicação in-tegrada de princípios e regras. Da tradicional abordagem puramente legalista passa-se atualmente para uma visão mais abrangente na teoria do Direito como Integridade, de RONALD DWORKIN, mediante a qual não só normas, mas também princípios, devem ser analisados de maneira sistêmica, integrada. Dado isso, a obra de DWORKIN é a base teórica de apoio às questões instigadas por todo este estudo, porque a aplicação integrada de princípios e regras se tornou essencial à busca do ideal de justiça, trazendo novo enfoque quanto ao papel do Direito Ad-ministrativo nesta ambiência de profundas e rápidas transformações típicas da hi-permodernidade. Considerada a nova concepção da separação dos poderes, o princípio da legalidade estrita, por encerrar uma fórmula de contenção do exercí-cio do poder estatal, deve ser contraposto a outros princípios constitucionais de igual relevo, observado o caso concreto. A acepção clássica da discricionarieda-de, assim, encontra-se de vez superada. O controle jurisdicional desses atos não é só possível, mas imprescindível num Estado Democrático de Direito. A síntese desse novo paradigma para o Direito Administrativo é clara e deve pautar a agen-da dos administradores na contemporaneidade: os administrados são os efetivos destinatários dos direitos e das garantias constitucionais. A técnica de pondera-ção dos princípios contrapondo valores nos casos considerados já faz parte da realidade da jurisprudência da hipermodernidade, que se encontra sintonizada com o neopositivismo e com a teoria do Direito como Integridade
Lestrade, Éric. "Les principes directeurs du procès dans la jurisprudence du Conseil Constitutionnel." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013BOR40033/document.
In spite of a relatively low number of written dispositions dedicated to justice inside of the body of the Constitution of October 1958 4th, the constitutional Council, while updating this text through the Declaration of Human Rights, contributed to the development of a procedural constitutional law, which is structured around guiding principles. Those principles can be classified within three different categories : two major categories depend on the trial actor that is primarily concerned, either the judge or the parties; a third and additional category pertaining to procedural protections, fosters the essential qualities of the judge and secure the protection of the parties’ rights. A gradation of the requirements of the constitutional Council is discreetly perceptible between the first two categories of principles, and more easily identifiable between those first two categories and the last one. This decreasing scale of “density” yoked to the trial guiding principles highlights a genuine judicial policy when it comes to procedural constitutional law, emphasizing access to the judge, whom is given essential qualities in order to achieve its judicial duty. However, the action of the French constitutional judge, as satisfactory as it is towards the rights of the trial, would easily support the intervention of the constituent power in order to update Justice’s constitutional status
Yang, Yu-Chieh, and 楊宇倢. "Categorization of Judicial Review on Administrative Discretion : An Analysis from Viewpoints of the Separation of Powers." Thesis, 2010. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/83076142257577838120.
臺灣大學
法律學研究所
98
Current level of administrative acts involve more extensively than before that handling cases are more likely to relate to reconciles of civil rights due to increasing of stakeholders concerned. In addition, modern public affairs are more complicated that the scope of executive power enlarges intensively. It’s still questionable whether traditional judicial reviews toward administrative discretion are proper to deal with different situations caused by varied conditions and referred issues. As the factors of modern administrative case concerned are more than before, judicial reviews on this need to be resorted for appropriate classification correspondingly. This thesis suggests the necessity of categorizing judicial reviews on administrative discretion under modern administrative case. Meanwhile, through reviewing the separation of powers that administrative discretion involved, this thesis directs to sort out appropriate recommendations for judicial review from modern administrative discretion, accomplishing the purpose of checks and balances of executive power effective. While varifying the necessity to categorize judicial reviews of administrative discretion as well as repective elements from different considerations, this thesis attempts to make suggestions toward judicial reviews of categozied adminstrative discretion. Following that, it studies the similarity between administrative discretion and indefinite concept of law. Judicial reviews of indefinite concept of law— the way to decide the density of reviews on types of cases, whether it can be used as reference. Furthermore, concerning the particularity of administrative discretion, it results in its conflict restriction of injunctive relief, prohibiting judges beyond the requirements of the case. Though it’s not the main topic in the thesis yet still related, it’s discussed in context.
Mhango, Mtendeweka Owen. "Separation of powers and the political question doctrine in South Africa : a comparative analysis." Thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/24238.
Public, Constitutional and International Law
LL. D.
Книги з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities":
Luchtman, Michiel. European cooperation between financial supervisory authorities, tax authorities and judicial authorities. [Antwerp, Belgium]: Intersentia, 2008.
Luchtman, Michiel. European cooperation between financial supervisory authorities, tax authorities and judicial authorities. [Antwerp, Belgium]: Intersentia, 2008.
Québec (Province). Groupe de travail sur l'autonomie administrative des tribunaux judiciaires. L' autonomie administrative des tribunaux judiciaires au Québec: Rapport du Groupe de travail sur l'autonomie administrative des tribunaux judiciaires. [Québec]: Le Groupe, 1993.
Timoshkin, K. A. Razdelenie i vzaimnoe sderzhivanie sudebnykh i ispolnitelʹnykh organov gosudarstvennoĭ vlasti. Ivanovo: Izdatelʹstvo "Ivanovskiĭ gosudarstvennyĭ universitet", 2011.
Oellers-Frahm, Karin. Review of constitutionality of legal norms and acts of public authorities in the Federal Republic of Germany. Heidelberg: C.F. Müller Juristicher Verlag, 1986.
Enterría, Eduardo García de. Democracia, jueces y control de la administración. 2nd ed. Madrid, España: Editorial Civitas, 1996.
Enterría, Eduardo García de. Democracia, jueces y control de la administración. Madrid: Editorial Civitas, 1995.
Enterría, Eduardo García de. Democracia, jueces y control de la administración. 4th ed. Madrid: Editorial Civitas, 1998.
Bourserie, Jérôme. L' action administrative au regard de la jurisprudence du tribunal des conflits. Lille: ANRT. Atelier national de reproduction des thèses, 2006.
Cohen, Dany. La cour de cassation et la séparation des autorités administrative et judiciaire. Paris: Economica, 1987.
Частини книг з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities":
Rosanvallon, Pierre. "Independent Authorities: History and Problems." In Democratic Legitimacy, translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Princeton University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691149486.003.0005.
Elliott, Mark, and Jason Varuhas. "15. Liability of Public Authorities." In Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198719465.003.0015.
Nazzini, Renato. "Judicial Proceedings." In Concurrent Proceedings In Competition Law, 77–106. Oxford University PressOxford, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199273799.003.0004.
Endicott, Timothy. "13. Ombudsmen and inquiries." In Administrative Law, 500–546. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192893567.003.0013.
Nazzini, Renato. "Administrative Proceedings." In Concurrent Proceedings In Competition Law, 41–76. Oxford University PressOxford, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199273799.003.0003.
Endicott, Timothy. "13. Ombudsmen." In Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804734.003.0013.
Endicott, Timothy. "11. Standing: litigation and the public interest." In Administrative Law, 428–64. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780192893567.003.0011.
Endicott, Timothy. "11. Standing: litigation and the public interest." In Administrative Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804734.003.0011.
Hendley, Kathryn, and Peter H. Solomon. "Constitutional and Administrative Justice." In The Judicial System of Russia, 179–98. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192895356.003.0012.
"G Article 146 Judicial Review of Administrative Action." In Constitutionalism - Human Rights - Separation of Powers, 113–54. Brill | Nijhoff, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004152410.i-164.41.
Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities":
Marković, Velisav. "O delotvornosti odluka Ustavnog suda Srbije i naknadi štete za nepoštovanje odluka nakon utvrđene povrede prava na suđenje u razumnom roku." In Prouzrokovanje štete, naknada štete i osiguranje. Institut za uporedno pravo, Udruženje za odštetno pravo, Pravosudna akademija, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.56461/zr_23.ons.16.
Özkan, Gürsel. "The Settlement of Compansation Disputes through Peace before Administrative Judiciary." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c07.01544.
Fedorov, Roman, and Dmitry Pixin. "On the question of the independence of the judicial branch in the theory of separation of powers." In Current problems of jurisprudence. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02058-6/252-258.
Jassim TOMAN, Shaimaa, Aymen Raheem ABDULAALI, and Ruqaya Adel HAMZA. "THE AUTHORTY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE INVESTIGATION AUTHORTY TO GRANT AMNESTY TO THE EMPLOYEE WHEN REPORTING CASES OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND FINANCIAL CORRUPTION." In III. International Congress of Humanities and Educational Research. Rimar Academy, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.47832/ijhercongress3-7.
Kovács-Szépvölgyi, Enikő. "The Role of the State in Child Protection in Hungary during the Period of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy." In Mezinárodní konference doktorských studentů oboru právní historie a římského práva. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0156-2022-11.
Kovaļevska, Anita. "Faktiskās rīcības seku novēršana tiesību uz efektīvu tiesas aizsardzību kontekstā." In Latvijas Universitātes 81. starptautiskā zinātniskā konference. LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/juzk.81.26.
Rapajić, Milan. "UPRAVNOPRAVNI ASPEKTI ZAŠTITE PRAVA POTROŠAČA U SRPSKOM PRAVU." In XIX majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.759r.
Zhang, Chao. "Risk of Shareholders Contributing Land Management Right as Capital under Separation of Land Ownership, Contract Right and Management Right and the Risk Avoidance." In 2nd International Conference on Judicial, Administrative and Humanitarian Problems of State Structures and Economic Subjects (JAHP 2017). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/jahp-17.2017.67.
Sviridenko, M. V. "INFRASTRUCTURAL AND ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MUNICIPALITY IN THE CONDITIONS OF CHANGING ITS ADMINISTRATIVE STATUS: THE POTENTIAL OF THE KOLTUSH RURAL SETTLEMENT OF THE LENINGRAD REGION." In Regional economy and territorial development. INSTITUTE OF PROBLEMS OF REGIONAL ECONOMICS OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52897/978-5-8088-1636-7-2021-15-1-102-114.
Selz, Allen. "Section XII of the ASME Code—Transport Tanks." In ASME 2003 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. ASMEDC, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2003-1790.
Звіти організацій з теми "Separation of administrative and judicial authorities":
Lewis, Dustin, Radhika Kapoor, and Naz Modirzadeh. Advancing Humanitarian Commitments in Connection with Countering Terrorism: Exploring a Foundational Reframing concerning the Security Council. Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict, December 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.54813/uzav2714.