Готові списки джерел за темами / Section of Antitrust Law

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 26 липня 2024
Оновлено: 28 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Зміст

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Section of Antitrust Law".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

1

Francis, Daniel. "Exclusion, Invasion and Abuse: Competition Law and its Constitutional Context." Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 12 (2010): 183–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1528887000001798.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract The orthodox view of antitrust, or competition, law is that it should be interpreted and enforced purely to maximise economic efficiency. This chapter argues that it is by no means so clear that the maximization of efficiency should be the sole aim of competition law, either as a matter of common-law tradition or as a matter of ‘original’ legislative intent. Moreover, such a narrow approach neglects the important social and political components and consequences of antitrust policy and adjudication. This chapter further argues that antitrust law exhibits a striking resemblance, in many ways, to constitutional law, in particular to the extent that it constitutes a social and political response, administered by courts, to three particularly problematic applications of power—the ‘exclusion, invasion and abuse’ of the title. The first section of the chapter introduces these themes. In the second section, the exclusion-invasion-abuse model is described and the implications of each broad type of rule are explored. In the third section, the historical development of modern antitrust law is traced in order to show that the ‘pure efficiency’ standard lacks any credible historical claim to particular authority or authenticity. The fourth and final section, a brief survey of competing normative accounts of antitrust law offers in order to demonstrate the extent to which a myopic focus on efficiency can occlude the underlying policy consequences of antitrust law and policy-making.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Francis, Daniel. "Exclusion, Invasion and Abuse: Competition Law and its Constitutional Context." Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 12 (2010): 183–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/152888712802636175.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractThe orthodox view of antitrust, or competition, law is that it should be interpreted and enforced purely to maximise economic efficiency. This chapter argues that it is by no means so clear that the maximization of efficiency should be the sole aim of competition law, either as a matter of common-law tradition or as a matter of ‘original’ legislative intent. Moreover, such a narrow approach neglects the important social and political components and consequences of antitrust policy and adjudication. This chapter further argues that antitrust law exhibits a striking resemblance, in many ways, to constitutional law, in particular to the extent that it constitutes a social and political response, administered by courts, to three particularly problematic applications of power—the ‘exclusion, invasion and abuse’ of the title. The first section of the chapter introduces these themes. In the second section, the exclusion-invasion-abuse model is described and the implications of each broad type of rule are explored. In the third section, the historical development of modern antitrust law is traced in order to show that the ‘pure efficiency’ standard lacks any credible historical claim to particular authority or authenticity. The fourth and final section, a brief survey of competing normative accounts of antitrust law offers in order to demonstrate the extent to which a myopic focus on efficiency can occlude the underlying policy consequences of antitrust law and policy-making.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Weber Waller, Spencer. "ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Intellectual Property and Antitrust Handbook, (2007)." World Competition 30, Issue 3 (September 1, 2007): 531–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2007034.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Edelman, Jonathan. "Reviving Antitrust Enforcement in the Airline Industry." Michigan Law Review, no. 120.1 (2021): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.36644/mlr.120.2.reviving.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The Department of Transportation (DOT) has broad but oft overlooked power to address antitrust issues among airlines through section 411 of the Federal Aviation Act. However, the DOT’s unwillingness to enforce antitrust more aggressively may be translating into higher fares and fees for airline travelers. More aggressive antitrust enforcement is urgently needed. Recent research has revealed a widespread practice of common ownership in the airline industry, whereby investment firms own large portions of rival airline companies. Although this practice leads to higher prices and reduced competition, antitrust regulators, from the DOT to the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission, have declined to take action. This Note argues that the DOT has the clear legal authority—and the responsibility—under section 411 to address common ownership among airlines by promulgating a rule that limits investors’ ability to own large shares of multiple airlines. DOT regulation in this area could pave the way for more muscular antitrust regulation among industry-specific agencies.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Gilmore, Debra A. "The Antitrust Implications of Boycotts by Health Care Professionals: Professional Standards, Professional Ethics and The First Amendment." American Journal of Law & Medicine 14, no. 2-3 (1988): 221–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0098858800006262.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
One rapidly evolving area of the law is the application of antitrust law to health care professionals. After the United States Supreme Court decided in 1975 that the “learned professions” were subject to the constraints imposed by the Sherman Antitrust Act, a significant number of antitrust actions have been filed against health care professionals and their professional organizations under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. These suits have found anticompetitive behavior in a variety of forms, ranging from tying arrangements and price-fixing agreements to certain forms of exclusive contracts and group boycotts.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Weber Waller, Spencer. "Book Review: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust Class Action Handbook (2010)." World Competition 33, Issue 3 (September 1, 2010): 542. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2010043.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Weber Waller, Spencer. "Book Review: ABA Section of Antitrust Law, Antitrust and Associations Handbook (2009)." World Competition 32, Issue 3 (September 1, 2009): 437–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2009041.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Weber Waller, Spencer, and Jennifer Woods. "Antitrust Transitions." World Competition 32, Issue 2 (June 1, 2009): 189–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2009019.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Antitrust enforcement is entering a period of transition in the United States. The election of Barack Obama as President and his executive branch, regulatory, and judicial appointments will have important consequences for antitrust law and enforcement, although most observers believe that these changes will be relatively modest both substantively and in comparison to the matters of banking reform and economic stimulus. As part of that process of change, there has been no shortage of advice offered to first the Transition Team and now the Administration about how to handle competition policy going forward. Two of the more substantial efforts in this regard have come from well-established antitrust groups with very different perspectives and memberships. Both the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association and the American Antitrust Institute have offered sophisticated lengthy public advice to the new Administration on how best to proceed in the competition law field. The reports are very different in nature and reflect the different nature of the institutions that prepared them. This essay takes a brief look at the transition reports offered by each organization and the vision they would offer for the new Administration.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Curfman, Gregory. "Law Journals, Biomedical Journals, and Restraint of Trade." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 50, no. 1 (2022): 195–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/jme.2022.25.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractLaw journals permit submission of scholarly manuscripts to multiple journals concurrently, but biomedical journals strictly forbid submission of manuscripts to more than one journal at a time. Law journals may then compete for the publication of manuscripts. This article examines whether the single-submission requirement of biomedical journals may constitute restraint of trade in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Bush, Darren. "Book Review: American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law: Transportation Antitrust Handbook (ABA, 2014)." World Competition 38, Issue 3 (September 1, 2015): 464–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2015036.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

1

Aydemir, Duygu. "Regulatory Framework Of The Sector-specific And Competition Rules In The Telecommunications Sector In Turkey In The Light Of The Eu Law." Master's thesis, METU, 2008. http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12609553/index.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
ABSTRACT REGULATORY FRAMEWORK OF THE SECTOR-SPECIFIC AND COMPETITION RULES IN THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS SECTOR IN TURKEY IN THE LIGHT OF THE EU LAW Aydemir, Duygu M.S., Department of European Studies Supervisor: Assist. Prof. Dr. Gamze Asç
ioglu-Ö
z May 2008, 189 pages This thesis examines the role of the sector-specific rules and competition rules in the liberalized telecommunications markets. It aims to analyse the design of the legal and institutional framework of these two sets of rules in the liberalized telecommunications sector in Turkey in the light of the EU law. To this purpose, the thesis initially compares and contrasts the main characteristics of and shared responsibilities between the sector-specific and economy-wide competition rules and institutions in the post-liberalization and post-privatization period. Then, the thesis explores the EU approach on the balance of influence between these two sets of rules and institutions. Against this background, the thesis examines role, design and interaction of the sector-specific and competition rules and institutions in the recently liberalized Turkish telecommunications markets. It, also, analyses some important competition law cases concluded by the Competition Authority. The thesis has two main arguments. Firstly, it argues that liberalization and privatization in the telecommunications sector does not automatically lead to the competitive environment in the sector. Competitiveness of the markets after the postliberalization and post-privatization period critically depends on the existence of a robust, coherent, and transparent regulatory framework ensuring a smooth balance between the sector-specific and the competition rules and institutions. Second argument is that sector-specific rules have a transitional character. As telecommunications markets move towards effective competition, sector-specific regulation will be reduced and the role of the competition rules in those markets will increase.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Al-Ameen, Hammeed Abayomi. "Antitrust : the person-centred approach." Thesis, Swansea University, 2012. https://cronfa.swan.ac.uk/Record/cronfa42765.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis proposes a different approach to theorising, analysing and expounding antitrust issues. It states that at present, antitrust is addressed from top-down and narrow perspectives which in effect limit or exclude issues that could otherwise be addressed as antitrust-related especially where antitrust concepts are understood and applied from a broader perspective. The justification for seeking inclusiveness is premised on the concept of procedural justice and on the democratisation of ideas. The thesis commences from a deconstructionist standpoint in order to show the weakness of top-down accounts. It is shown that the prevailing and dominant antitrust accounts cannot lay exclusive claim to antitrust. This is proved by establishing the deconstructability of such individual theories by making due reference to the position of "the Other". The failure to give adequate countenance to the position of "the Other" means that this theories will likely fail to be inclusive. Thus, with the aim of correcting the problem of exclusion attributed to top-down accounts, the thesis identifies the need to construct a bottom-up account. As a precondition, the thesis recognises that any such bottom-up account must avoid making ex ante judgments about the suitability or otherwise of the normative contents of antitrust laws and theories. Taking this condition into account, two alternative approaches based on pure procedural justice are outlined - Habermas' Discourse Ethics and the person-centred approach. The former is shown to be incapable of practical application. This makes it imperative to thoroughly substantiate the latter. The person-centred analysis showcases the conceptual value of inclusiveness by assessing antitrust law and policy through the position of the parties involved. The conceptual value of inclusiveness is also showcased from the policy perspective through the capability approach. This account also shows the value of inclusiveness to antitrust enforcement. It however falls short in terms of adjudicatory value particularly in terms of its practical application. The practical shortfall notwithstanding, this thesis concludes by emphasising how the idea behind the person-centred approach could potentially enrich antitrust discourse and also guide policy-makers and enforcers.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Puffer-Mariette, Jean-Christophe. "Die Effektivität von Kronzeugenregelungen im Kartellrecht : eine Analyse und Bewertung des amerikanischen, europäischen, deutschen und französischen Leniency-Programms /." Baden-Baden : Nomos, 2008. http://d-nb.info/98805700X/04.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Dabbah, Maher. "Building global antitrust policy : law and politics." Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 2001. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/building-global-antitrust-policy--law-and-politics(d5c2ecd1-9495-49f4-89d9-340b2c83e39f).html.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Le, More Pauline. "Le droit et les cartels internationaux /." Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=80936.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis aims to underline the paradox surrounding cartels in general and international cartels in particular. While they are almost unanimously recognised as the most egregious form of antitrust violations, real political willingness fails to fight efficiently against cartels. Notwithstanding, this paper shows why international cooperation is essential but still unsatisfactory in eliminating international cartels through concrete examples in domestic laws, such as the Fine Arts Auctions Case and export cartel configurations. Existing national and international instruments present advantages and disadvantages. International competition law, including international cartel issues, is still subject to virulent debates within the international community, particularly with respect to the future of a WTO Multilateral Agreement. It raises the question as to what can be suggested in order to solve aspects of these debates in a satisfactory manner and thereby contribute---modestly---to ameliorate the fight against international cartels.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Finkelstein, Eric. "Antitrust issues in hospital markets /." Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/7437.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Glader, Marcus. "Innovation markets and competition analysis : EU competition law and US antitrust law /." Lund : Faculty of Law, Lund Univ, 2004. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/476526825.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Martínez, Mata Yolanda. "Abuso de dominio en el sector farmacéutico." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/482189.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
El sector farmacéutico es uno de los sectores empresariales en que la tensión entre el Derecho de la Competencia y el Derecho de la Propiedad Intelectual es más evidente. Los objetivos de cada uno de esos ámbitos normativos son, en su misma esencia, contrapuestos y, sin embargo, ambos son socialmente deseables. La aplicación del artículo 102 TFUE en el sector farmacéutico constituye una de las manifestaciones de esa tensión y, a pesar del extenso debate doctrinal habido al respecto, siguen sin estar claras las líneas divisorias entre uno y otro ámbito normativo. En esta tesis nos adentramos en la exploración de esas líneas divisorias, con la perspectiva que ofrece el transcurso de prácticamente una década desde que la Comisión Europea publicara los resultados de su investigación sectorial en el ámbito farmacéutico. Esa década ha ofrecido tan solo unos pocos asuntos y algunos de ellos están todavía pendientes de recurso ante los tribunales comunitarios. Sin embargo, aun siendo escasos, esos asuntos permiten ya atisbar algunas líneas de convergencia entre los distintos tipos de abuso en el sector farmacéutico y ofrecer una aproximación sistemática a la aplicación del artículo 102 TFUE a este sector. Los asuntos de abuso en los que la conducta del operador dominante ha buscado beneficiarse de una regulación sectorial fragmentaria sin ir más allá de cuanto esa regulación permitía, pero en contra de los objetivos del mercado interior (caso Glaxo Grecia y es posible que en un futuro también el caso Aspen), requieren un análisis de efectos. Al contrario, en los asuntos de abuso en los que la conducta del operador dominante ha perseguido ahondar la distorsión de la competencia derivada de la regulación, yendo más allá de los límites de esta (AstraZeneca y Servier), se ha recurrido a la lógica de las infracciones por objeto. El acierto de esta aproximación de cara a asuntos futuros dependerá, al menos en parte, de que las restricciones por objeto sean únicamente aquellas en las que no exista una explicación legítima plausible para la conducta del operador dominante más allá de su intención de eliminar a la competencia. Aun en esos casos, será necesario además que el operador dominante pueda desvirtuar esa determinación prima facie de la existencia de un abuso objetivo. Desde esta perspectiva, la aplicación del artículo 102 TFUE se limitaría a los asuntos en que la regulación sectorial o los DPI no permitan corregir las situaciones en que el sistema se utiliza para una finalidad distinta a la prevista por el legislador. En otras palabras, la casuística y jurisprudencia habidas hasta la fecha en el sector farmacéutico evidencian una clara opción de las instituciones y tribunales comunitarios por utilizar el Derecho de la Competencia y, en particular, el artículo 102 TFUE a modo de mecanismo corrector de las deficiencias de un sistema de patentes no armonizado, fragmentario y disperso y de una regulación sectorial todavía parcialmente nacional.
El sector farmacèutic és un dels sectors empresarials en què la tensió entre el Dret de la Competència i el Dret de la Propietat Intel·lectual és més evident. Els objectius de cadascun d’aquests àmbits normatius són, en la seva pròpia essència, contraposats i, tanmateix, tots dos són socialment desitjables. L’aplicació de l’article 102 TFUE al sector farmacèutic constitueix una de les manifestacions d’aquesta tensió i, malgrat l’extens debat doctrinal al respecte, continuen sense estar clares les línies divisòries entre un i altre àmbit normatiu. En aquesta tesi ens endinsem en l’exploració d’aquestes línies divisòries, amb la perspectiva que ofereix el transcurs de pràcticament una dècada d’ençà que la Comissió Europea publicà els resultats de llur investigació sectorial en l’àmbit farmacèutic. Aquesta dècada ha ofert només uns pocs assumptes i alguns d’ells estan encara pendents de recurs davant dels tribunals comunitaris. Malgrat ésser escassos, aquests assumptes permeten ja percebre algunes línies de convergència entre els diferents tipus d’abús en el sector farmacèutic i oferir una aproximació sistemàtica a l’aplicació de l’article 102 TFUE a aquest sector. Els assumptes d’abús en els quals la conducta de l’operador dominant ha cercat beneficiar-se d’una regulació sectorial fragmentària sense anar més enllà d’allò que aquella regulació permetia, però en contra dels objectius del mercat interior (cas Glaxo Grècia i és possible que en un futur també el cas Aspen), requereixen una anàlisi d’efectes. Al contrari, en els assumptes d’abús en què la conducta de l’operador dominant ha cercat aprofundir la distorsió de la competència derivada de la regulació, anant més enllà dels límits de la mateixa (AstraZeneca i Servier), s’ha utilitzat la lògica de les infraccions per objecte. L’encert d’aquesta aproximació de cara a assumptes futurs dependrà, com a mínim en part, de que les restriccions per objecte siguin únicament aquelles en què no existeixi una explicació legítima plausible per a la conducta de l’operador dominant més enllà de la seva intenció d’eliminar la competència. Inclús en aquests casos, serà necessari, a més a més, que l’operador dominant pugui desvirtuar aquesta determinació prima facie de l’existència d’un abús objectiu. Des d’aquesta perspectiva, l’aplicació de l’article 102 TFUE es limitaria als assumptes en què la regulació sectorial o els DPI no permetin corregir les situacions en què el sistema de patents s’utilitza per a una finalitat diferent de la prevista pel legislador. En d’altres paraules, la casuística i la jurisprudència existents a data d’avui evidencien una clara opció de les institucions i tribunals comunitaris per utilitzar el Dret de la Competència i, en particular, l’article 102 TFUE com a mecanisme corrector de les deficiències d’un sistema de patents no harmonitzat, fragmentari i dispers i d’una regulació sectorial encara parcialment nacional.
The pharmaceutical sector is one of the industrial sectors in which the tension between Competition Law and Intellectual Property Law becomes most apparent. The objectives of both sets of regulation are in opposition by their very nature and, nevertheless, they are both socially desirable. The application of Article 102 TFEU to the pharmaceutical sector evidences that tension and, despite copious doctrinal debate, the boundaries between both regulatory regimes are still unclear. In this PhD, we explore those boundaries in perspective because almost a decade has elapsed since the publication of the European Commission’s inquiry into the pharmaceutical sector. During this decade only a few cases have been analysed and some of them are still under judicial review. Despite the scarcity, these cases allow for some opinions on convergence lines among the different types of abuse in this sector and for a systematic approach to the application of Article 102 TFUE to this sector. Abuse cases in which the dominant undertaking sought to benefit from a disperse sectoral regulation without exceeding the limits of that regulation (Glaxo Greece case and possibly in a near future also Aspen case), but acting against the objectives of the internal market, require an effects analysis. Conversely, abuse cases in which the dominant undertaking sought to deepen the regulatory distortion of competition exceeding the limits of that regulation (AstraZeneca and Servier), a by-object infringement was deemed to exist. The wisdom of this approach in the prospect of future cases will depend, at least in part, on the limitation of by-object infringements to such behaviour for which there is no other plausible explanation than the intention to eliminate competitors. Even in the latter cases, the dominant undertaking must have the possibility to rebut this prima facie presumption of the existence of a by-object restriction. From this perspective, the application of Article 102 TFEU would be limited to those cases in which the sectoral regulation or the Intellectual Property legislation prove inadequate to overcome situations of regulatory misuse for an objective different from that of the legislator. In other words, so far precedents and case-law in the pharmaceutical sector evidence a clear choice from EU institutions and courts consisting of the use of Competition Law and, in particular, Article 102 TFEU as a correction mechanism against regulatory imperfections deriving from a non-harmonized and fragmented patent system and from a sectoral regulation that remains partially national.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Davis, Owen B. "Antitrust punishments in experimental duopoly markets." Laramie, Wyo. : University of Wyoming, 2008. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1654492701&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=18949&RQT=309&VName=PQD.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Alen, Balde. "Private antitrust law enforcement in cases with international elements." Thesis, University of Glasgow, 2016. http://theses.gla.ac.uk/7060/.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The Supreme Court of the United States consented in its Empagran decision that the foreign antitrust injury that is in a dependency relationship with anticompetitive effects (antitrust injury) in the U.S. is to be litigated before the U.S. courts. Since this decision antitrust law litigation in an international context does not depend merely on anticompetitive effects in the U.S., but also on the relationship between anticompetitive effect and (foreign) private antitrust injury. This is something that was not present in pre-Empagran cases. The Supreme Court did not provide conditions on the basis of which the relationship between anticompetitive effects and private antitrust injury could be classified as one of dependency. This means that the Supreme Court left the determination of these conditions to lower U.S. courts. The lower U.S. courts, instead of attempting to determine these conditions, have made foreign private antitrust injury even more difficult to litigate before the U.S. courts. There are three factors that contributed to this development in U.S. case law: the understanding of the Empagran litigation; the understanding of the nature of the international context, and U.S. courts taking a pro-active role in delivering their decisions for which the reasoning is difficult to understand. The greatest obstacle that post-Empagran U.S. courts have placed in front of private antitrust litigants is the requirement that instead of ‘dependency connection’ there should be ‘direct causation’ between anticompetitive effects in the U.S. and litigated (foreign) private antitrust injury. This thesis considers the existing theoretical and practical problems of the current analytical framework under which antitrust violation is analysed in an international context. The thesis introduces the new legal concept of a ‘transborder standard’. This is necessitated by the starting position of this thesis that a factual situation under adjudication cannot be only either ‘domestic’ or ‘foreign’, but can also be ‘transborder’. The introduction of the transborder standard to the existing theoretical framework enables (and requires) the analysis of the factual situation under adjudication in its integrity, bearing in mind also the purpose of private antitrust law enforcement and the right of private parties to be compensated for suffered antitrust injury. The transborder standard provides a framework to analyse antitrust claims brought before the U.S. courts by those private parties who satisfy their private antitrust injury outside the U.S. At the same time, the transborder standard does not enable private litigants to take advantage of simultaneous antitrust litigation before U.S. courts and the courts of non-U.S. countries. ‘Transborder standard’ is a new legal concept. Nevertheless, the existing system of U.S. antitrust law enforcement does support it and, consequently, the transborder standard can be directly applied.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

1

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law handbook. [Chicago?: The Section, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

S, Boast Molly, Horning Mark F. 1946-, Langsdorf Roger W, Altschuler Stuart 1954-, and American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Insurance Industry Committee., eds. The Insurance antitrust handbook: A project of the Insurance Industry Committee, Section of Antitrust Law. Chicago, Ill: The Section, American Bar Association, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

W, Davis Ronald, Carr Ronald G, American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law., and Private Merger Litigation Task Force., eds. Private litigation under section 7 of the Clayton Act: Law and policy. [Chicago, IL]: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, 1989.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Johnson, Cheryl Lee. California state antitrust and unfair competition law: The State Bar of California antitrust and unfair competition law section. Edited by State Bar of California. Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section. New Providence, NJ: LexisNexis Matthew Bender, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

American Society of Corporate Secretaries., ed. Interlocking directors: Federal Trade Commission enforcement of section 8 of the Clayton Act and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. New York, N.Y. (1270 Ave. of the Americas, New York 10020): American Society of Corporate Secretaries, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

American Society of Corporate Secretaries., ed. Interlocking directors: Federal Trade Commission enforcement of section 8 of the Clayton Act and section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act. New York, N.Y. (1270 Ave. of the Americas, New York 10020): American Society of Corporate Secretaries, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Committee on Civil Practice and Procedure., ed. Antitrust evidence handbook / [prepared by the Civil Practice and Procedure Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association]. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Canadian Bar Association. Competition Law Section. Conference. Competition law for the 21st century: Papers of the Canadian Bar Association Competition Law Section 1997 annual conference. Edited by Musgrove James B. Yonkers, NY: Juris Pub., 1998.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

V, Hartwell Ray, Mugel Christopher J, Allen Joseph J, and American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee., eds. Handbook on antitrust grand jury investigations: A project of the Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association. 2nd ed. [Chicago]: American Bar Association, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Kovacic, William E. The antitrust government contracts handbook: A project of the Sherman Act Section 1 Committee. [Chicago]: Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

1

Gilbert, Scott. "Antitrust Law." In Multi-Market Antitrust Economics, 3–13. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69386-6_1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Steren, E. John. "Antitrust Law." In Laws of Medicine, 327–47. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08162-0_22.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Heinemann, Andreas. "Behavioural Antitrust." In European Perspectives on Behavioural Law and Economics, 211–42. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11635-8_11.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Portuese, Aurelien. "Antitrust Populism: Theory." In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1–7. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_770-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Portuese, Aurelien. "Antitrust Populism: Practice." In Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 1–7. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_771-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Gilbert, Richard, and Oliver Williamson. "Antitrust Policy." In The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law, 82–88. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-74173-1_19.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Wiemer, Frederik. "Sports and Antitrust Law." In Management for Professionals, 43–61. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56495-7_3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Tremblay, Victor J., and Carol Horton Tremblay. "Antitrust Law and Regulation." In Springer Texts in Business and Economics, 587–646. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3241-8_20.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Kirch, Pierre. "The Technology Innovation Time Gap in Competition Law Enforcement: Assessing the European Commission’s Approach." In Algorithmic Antitrust, 155–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85859-9_7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

"Development of Section 1 Doctrine." In Antitrust Law, 90–112. Cambridge University Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511610158.006.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

1

Ying, Chenlin. "Concept Reconstruction and Guarantee Standard of Antitrust Law in Professional Sports." In 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-18.2018.306.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Jiang, Nan, and Taolue Zhang. "Study on antitrust law risk evaluation of patent pool based on GRAM." In 2012 9th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management (ICSSSM 2012). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsssm.2012.6252264.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Dekhtiar, Ivan N. "Urgent Issues Of Antitrust Regulations In Pharmaceutical Industry In Pandemic." In International Scientific and Practical Conference «State and Law in the Context of Modern Challenges. European Publisher, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2022.01.26.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Liuhong, Chen. "Regulation of Antitrust Law on Information Concentration of Platform Economy Users under Flexible Semantic Similarity." In 2023 World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/wconf58270.2023.10235051.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Šokinjov, Stefan. "DENIAL OF ACCESS TO RESOURCES INDISPENSABLE FOR PROVISION OF SERVICES." In International scientific conference challenges and open issues of service law. Vol. 2. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of law, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xxmajsko2.549s.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Resources indispensable for provision of services are facilities or infrastructure without access to which undertaking which already reached the minimal level of efficiency to enter the relevant downstream market cannot provide services to their customers. Because alternative resources can not be neither practically nor reasonably duplicated, resources indispensable for provision of services represent an insuperable barrier for entrance to relevant downstream market and in such a way obtain importance of and refer to a known US antitrust law concept of essential facilities. Denial to access to an essential facility is a subset of refusal to deal cases. It means that save cases where legal regulation in liberalised sectors imposes an obligation to provide for access, compulsory access to infrastructure and other resources indispensable for provision of services will be exceptionally enjoined in situations where otherwise a serious detriment to competition would be occurred.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Šokinjov, Stefan. "IZUZIMANjE UGOVORA O ISTRAŽIVANjU I RAZVOJU OD PRAVNOG DEJSTVA KARTELNE ZABRANE." In XVII majsko savetovanje. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujvcu, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/uvp21.115s.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Research and development are placed at the heart of the European strategy for achievement of sustainable growth within knowledge economy. At the same time, research and development agreements are restrictive agreements in the meaning of Antitrust law. Therefore regulators must find a balance between protection of competition and stimulation of technological progress. In this paper the Commission Regulation No 1217/2020 analyzed. It is the regulation on the application of Article 101(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to certain categories of research and development agreements.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Hulicki, Maciej. "ALGORITHM TRANSPARENCY AS A SINE QUA NON PREREQUISITE FOR A SUSTAINABLE COMPETITION IN A DIGITAL MARKET?" In International Jean Monnet Module Conference of EU and Comparative Competition Law Issues "Competition Law (in Pandemic Times): Challenges and Reforms. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18823.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Algorithms play a fundamental role in the digital economy. Their impact on the situation of market participants is significant. Hence, ensuring transparency of algorithms, through access to them, is crucial for the proper functioning of the market. Several models of algorithmic transparency are analyzed in the paper: from lack of transparency to complete regulation of algorithms. In particular, transparency through explanation, and “on-demand transparency” were proposed. The goal of the paper is to determine the optimal form and scope of regulation of this area, in order to ensure sustainable competition in the digital market. Hence, the paper focuses on the concept of algorithmic transparency, the nature of the competition in the digital market, the role of algorithms within the digital trade, and problems related to the regulation of algorithms. This allows to answering the question of whether algorithmic transparency is an indispensable condition for sustainable competition in the digital market, and what are the legal challenges, which may arise with respect to various models of algorithm transparency. The paper is embedded within the EU legal framework, discusses new legislative developments in the EU law, such as the proposal for the Digital Markets Act, and includes analysis of EU antitrust case-law and market practices.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

"SECTION 7: Cyber Security and IT Law." In 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/acit49673.2020.9209007.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Shi, Zijing, Qihui Liu, Linlin Wu, and Man Xu. "Static Voltage Stability Limit Law of Typical Coupling Section." In 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Control Science (IC2ECS). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ic2ecs60824.2023.10493604.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Rystemaj, Jonida, and Eniana Qarri. "THE RESPONSE OF THE ALBANIAN COMPETITION AUTHORITY TO THE COVID-19 CRISIS." In International Jean Monnet Module Conference of EU and Comparative Competition Law Issues "Competition Law (in Pandemic Times): Challenges and Reforms. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18825.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic was a shock for the global economy. It affected almost every country, but certainly in developing countries its impact was harder. The immediate effect was the shortage of several medical and paramedical equipment which were necessary to prevent the virus spread. This shortage was felt in Albanian markets as well and was rapidly followed by a sharp increase of prices in paramedical products. The consumers suffered the highly increased prices amongst fear that in absence of these products, their life was threatened. This behaviour of the market participants was considered suspicious by the Competition Authority which decided to initiate a preliminary investigation to find out whether this behaviour was abusive, or it normally reflected the sudden shortage and the state of emergency. The instigation of this procedure was based on several complaints reported in the media and complaints directly submitted by consumers to the Competition Authority. At the first glance, the traders were exploiting the health emergency to maximise their profits. Subsequently, the Competition Authority (CA) decided to apply some preliminary measures on the wholesale market operators. Furthermore, the CA intervened even in a case of a company in dominant position which was furnishing selected pharmacies. These interventions aimed at restoring somehow the distorted competition in paramedical and medical products. This article will try to shed light on the current market situation and on the effectiveness of the interventions of the CA. How should the Competition Authority behave to restore the distorted competition? Are the current introduced measures enough to help all market participants overcome this state of health emergency? These questions and other issues related with the peculiar situation will be addressed in the current article. The article will be organized as follows: First, a glimpse of the regulation of Albanian competition law will be given. Second, the situation under COVID-19 emergency will be elaborated taking into consideration the guidelines of Communication of the Commission on “Temporary Framework for assessing antitrust issues related to business cooperation in response to situations of urgency stemming from the current COVID-19 outbreak” (2020/C 116 I/02). Lastly, the evaluation of the measures introduced by the Competition authority will be analysed and recommendations will be provided.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "Section of Antitrust Law"

1

Maurer, Stephen, and Suzanne Scotchmer. Profit Neutrality in Licensing: The Boundary between Antitrust Law and Patent Law. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, June 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10546.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Dymond, Francis. DOD Contractor Collaborations: Proposed Procedures for Integrating Antitrust Law, Procurement Law, and Purchasing Decisions. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada440814.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Glick, Mark, Gabriel A. Lozada, and Darren Bush. Why Economists Should Support Populist Antitrust Goals. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, December 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp195.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Antitrust economists have generally supported the Consumer Welfare Standard as a guide to antitrust policy questions because of its origins in Marshall’s consumer surplus approach and the general economic surplus approach to welfare economics. But welfare economists no longer support the surplus approach because decades of research pertaining to the surplus approach have uncovered numerous inconsistencies and serious ethical challenges. However, the surplus approach to welfare survives in industrial organization textbooks and among industrial organization economists that specialize in antitrust. We argue in this paper that the Consumer Welfare Standard is not a reliable standard and should be abandoned. We cite several reasons: (1) it limits antitrust goals a priori without any defensible justification, (2) it considers all transfers of surplus between stakeholders in antitrust cases to be welfare neutral, (3) it is biased in favor of big business and the rich, and (4) the accumulation of inconsistencies and problems documented by welfare economists renders the theory completely unreliable. In a final section of the paper, we preliminarily contend that modern research in welfare economics concerning the factors that influence human welfare could be used to inform a more progressive standard for determining antitrust goals.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Dean, Olivia, and Jane Sung. Section 1332 State Innovation Waivers: Understanding Federal Law and Guidance. AARP Public Policy Institute, September 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.26419/ppi.00081.001.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Cunha e Melo, Mariana, and Jonas de Abreu Castro. Section 230 and the future of the internet. Center for Technology and Public Interest, SL, March 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.59262/ejp3ba.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The US Supreme Court is considering the fate of Section 230, a law that protects content platforms from liability for user-generated content. The case, Gonzalez v. Google, challenges the intermediary liability protection of Section 230. If the challenge succeeds, it could undermine the foundation of Web 2.0 and the internet's future. The case focuses on whether platforms like Google, Twitter, and TikTok should be held liable for third-party content from their recommendation engines. Challenging Section 230 could have severe consequences for freedom of expression and lead to restrictions on recommendation engines or higher restrictions on publishing or sharing. Section 230 has been settled law for over two decades and protects content platforms, even if they encourage users to post content.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Greene, N. M., J. W. Arwood, R. Q. Wright, and C. V. Parks. The LAW Library -- A multigroup cross-section library for use in radioactive waste analysis calculations. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), August 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10176111.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Glick, Mark, Gabriel A. Lozada, Pavitra Govindan, and Darren Bush. The Horizontal Merger Efficiency Fallacy. Institute for New Economic Thinking Working Paper Series, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.36687/inetwp212.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission Merger Guidelines (the “Merger Guidelines”), including the much improved latest revision in 2023 (the “New Merger Guidelines”), have continued to perpetrate what we call in this paper the horizontal merger efficiency fallacy. The fallacy arises because in the Guidelines the term “efficiencies” has become unmoored from its foundations in economic theory and has been reduced to the business school construct of cost savings. We show that cost savings can only be considered universally socially beneficial by acceptance of what is termed “the Consumer Welfare Standard” (antitrust) or “the surplus theory of welfare” (economics), a theory that has been discredited and abandoned by welfare economists. In economic theory, efficiency means Pareto Efficiency. We explore the various attempts to tether the cost savings definition of efficiency to Pareto Efficiency and explain why these attempts have failed. We conclude that there is no sound way to theoretically reconcile cost savings with the economic meaning of efficiencies. We then move beyond the efficiency fallacy and show how modern welfare economics can be used to integrate Congressional antitrust goals into the New Merger Guidelines. This requires abandoning the unsupported “standard deduction” for efficiencies and replacing it with an evidence-based assessment of how a specific merger under review potentially impacts Congressional antitrust goals. This change renders the present efficiency rebuttal section of the New Merger Guidelines superfluous, and we provide specific reasons why this section as currently drafted is flawed and should be jettisoned.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Klosek, Katherine. Issue Brief: Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act: Research Library Perspectives. Association of Research Libraries, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/brief.section230cda2021.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This issue brief provides background on Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and implications for libraries of the potential changes to the law, as well as a summary of the discussion held during the Spring 2021 Association of Research Libraries Meeting. Through the discussion several ideas surfaced on how university and library policies connect to Section 230. A few illustrative examples from UC San Diego are included in the discussion summary.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Eastman, Brittany. Facial Recognition Software and Privacy Law in Transportation Technology. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, May 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/epr2024011.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
<div class="section abstract"><div class="htmlview paragraph">Data privacy questions are particularly timely in the automotive industry as—now more than ever before—vehicles are collecting and sharing data at great speeds and quantities. Though connectivity and vehicle-to-vehicle technologies are perhaps the most obvious, smart city infrastructure, maintenance, and infotainment systems are also relevant in the data privacy law discourse.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph"><b>Facial Recognition Software and Privacy Law in Transportation Technology</b> considers the current legal landscape of privacy law and the unanswered questions that have surfaced in recent years. A survey of the limited recent federal case law and statutory law, as well as examples of comprehensive state data privacy laws, is included. Perhaps most importantly, this report simplifies the balancing act that manufacturers and consumers are performing by complying with data privacy laws, sharing enough data to maximize safety and convenience, and protecting personal information.</div><div class="htmlview paragraph"><a href="https://www.sae.org/publications/edge-research-reports" target="_blank">Click here to access the full SAE EDGE</a><sup>TM</sup><a href="https://www.sae.org/publications/edge-research-reports" target="_blank"> Research Report portfolio.</a></div></div>
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Brown, David. Analysis of the Deployed Military Health Information System and Its Ability to Satisfy Requirements of Public Law 105-85, Section 765. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada444076.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Section of Antitrust Law" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах Дисертації Книги
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії