Готові списки джерел за темами / Scientific

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Scientific"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021
Оновлено: 9 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Scientific".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Зміст

  1. Статті в журналах
  2. Дисертації
  3. Книги
  4. Частини книг
  5. Тези доповідей конференцій
  6. Звіти організацій

Статті в журналах з теми "Scientific":

1

Fioravanti, M., F. Giannetti, S. Spinelli, and M. Marchetti. "Bibliometric analysis of the scientific production in forestry-related scientific fields." Forest@ - Rivista di Selvicoltura ed Ecologia Forestale 15, no. 1 (June 30, 2018): 65–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3832/efor2861-015.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Nikitin, Valeriy. "Scientific revolutions, scientific rationality, scientific traditions." Bulletin of Science and Research Center “Stroitelstvo”, no. 2(29) (2021): 149–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2021-2(29)-149-155.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Представленный материал позволяет понять, когда, каким образом и в какой форме происходят научные революции, к каким результатам приводят и какие коренные изменения в миропонимании объективной реальности они вызывают. Научные традиции, наоборот, обеспечивают стабильность и устойчивость развития так называемой «нормальной» науки в рамках той господствующей парадигмы, которая утверждается в результате научной революции.
3

R Abzalova, Shakhnoza, Surat S. Gulyamov, Dilfuza T. Ashurova, and Jahongir B. Husainov. "Scientific Study Procedure." International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation 24, Special Issue 1 (February 28, 2020): 928–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.37200/ijpr/v24sp1/pr201236.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Quoc,, Nguyen Anh, and Lam Ngoc Linh. "The Scientific Essence." International Journal of Social Science And Human Research 05, no. 10 (October 27, 2022): 4711–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-40.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Anything, phenomenon, or person that exists has a balance in internal and external exchange. The exchange of humans is a natural, social exchange. Natural, social on the outside becomes knowledge within man. The exchange of knowledge is the exchange within and outside of humans, the exchange of life. Human life manifests itself in functions and tasks in work, occupation, and scientific knowledge. Scientific knowledge is human life, but science becomes a profession that makes science strange, that is science outside of humans. Science beyond humans is science fiction. Imagination in science takes the premise outside of humans as a yardstick for comparison between humans. Discrimination between human beings appears as right and wrong, truth and falsehood, justice and injustice, good and evil, beautiful and ugly, rich and poor, noble and low... Science outside people take philosophy, mathematics as a methodology, the correctness of science is measured by a philosophical or mathematical stance, but philosophy and mathematics are started from a premise outside of man, not yet proof, it makes science puzzling, imaginary. Imagination becomes the impotence of science, the unhappiness of man. The need to eliminate helplessness and unhappiness becomes the need to abolish science fiction, to abolish science beyond humans. Science takes human life as the premise, that is human science, human philosophy.
5

Putnam, Hilary. "Scientific Liberty and Scientific Licence." Grazer Philosophische Studien 30 (1987): 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/gps1987305.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Pearce, S. C., and I. D. Bross. "Scientific Fraud vs. Scientific Truth." Biometrics 49, no. 3 (September 1993): 958. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2532226.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Shone, Ronald. "Scientific Word and Scientific Workplace." Economic Journal 105, no. 433 (November 1995): 1688. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2235147.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Putnam, Hilary. "SCIENTIFIC LIBERTY AND SCIENTIFIC LICENCE." Grazer Philosophische studien 30, no. 1 (August 13, 1987): 43–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18756735-90000330.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Durrenberger, E. Paul. "Scientific Anthropology:Reclaiming a Scientific Anthropology." Anthropology Humanism 24, no. 1 (June 1999): 86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/ahu.1999.24.1.86.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

RELYEA, HAROLD C. "Scientific Freedom and Scientific Responsibility." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 577, no. 1 Ethical Issue (December 1989): 200–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1989.tb15066.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Scientific" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах Дисертації Книги

Дисертації з теми "Scientific":

1

Park, Seungbae. "Scientific realism vs. scientific antirealism." Diss., The University of Arizona, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/289710.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
According to Boyd/Putnam, scientific realism is the view that successful theories are typically approximately true and that their key terms typically refer. The no-miracle argument for the view holds that approximate truth and reference provide the best explanation of the success of science. I try to defend scientific realism from the following six lines of antirealist objections. First, constructive empiricists argue that inference to the best explanation is a problematic rule of inference. I try to show that their critiques of inference to the best explanation backfire on van Fraassen's positive philosophical theories, such as the contextual theory of explanation and constructive empiricism. Second, pessimistic inducers argue that successful current theories will follow the fate of successful past theories which turned out to be completely false. I reply that realists can get around the historical objection, once they take the realist attitude only toward successful theories that cohere with each other. Third, antirealists from van Fraassen (1980) to Stanford (2000) have been proposing antirealist explanations of the success of science, thereby challenging the realist claim that the realist proposal is the best. I criticize eight antirealist proposals that I found in the literature with a view to proving that the realist proposal is still the best of the proposals I know of. Fourth, antirealists reject realism based on their views on the nature of scientific explanation. I critically evaluate four antirealist objections coming from that route. Fifth, antirealists might object that the key realist predicate, 'approximate truth,' is obscure. I reply that the predicate is viable, because there are clear cases of approximately true descriptions, and because Hilpinen/Lewis's theoretical account of approximate truth can handle those clear cases. Sixth, constructive empiricists claim that constructive empiricism is better than scientific realism because it explains science without extra epistemic risk. I attempt to prove, contrary to what the constructive empiricists believe, that empirical adequacy is harder to come by than approximate truth in the light of the pessimistic induction and the realist responses to it. Conclusion. Semantic, economic, empirical, and pragmatic considerations as a whole favor scientific realism over scientific antirealism, when realists believe that our best theories, successful theories that cohere with each other, are approximately true, and antirealists believe that they are approximately empirically adequate. Scientific realism is overall better than scientific antirealism.
2

Jardine, Boris Samuel. "Scientific moderns." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2012. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.610691.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Kochakian, Nick. "Scientific visualizations /." Online version of thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1850/10644.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Finney, Colin Michael. "Scientific citizenship : extending public participation in scientific decision making." Thesis, Imperial College London, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10044/1/8807.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Cheng, Peter C.-H. "Modelling scientific discovery." Thesis, Open University, 1990. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.256257.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Simons, Pino Adrián. "The scientific proof." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2018. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/123854.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
The scientific advances have greatly influenced the perception of the facts, generating some objectivation of the perception of the proof . In the past, many decisions were made on the basis of common sense and presumptions. This is reduced by the performance of more reliable evidence, which can generate a better conviction in the judge or legal operator.In this article, the author develops the effects that scientific evidence has had on legal practitioners, such as judges. Also, a theoretical framework will be proposed to understand this type of test, taking as reference emblematic cases.
Los avances científicos han influenciado enormemente la percepción de los hechos, generando cierta objetivación de la percepción de la prueba. En el pasado, muchas decisiones se tomaban sobre la base del sentido común y las presunciones. Ello se ve reducido con la actuación de medios probatorios más certeros y fiables, los cuales pueden generar una mejor convicción en el juez u operador jurídico.En el presente artículo, el autor desarrolla los efectos que ha tenido la prueba científica en los operadores del derecho, como los jueces. Asimismo, se planteará un marco teórico para comprender a dicho tipo de prueba, tomando como referencia casos emblemáticos.
7

Miller, Fiona Carleton University Dissertation Political Science. "Rousseau's scientific bagatelle." Ottawa, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Costantini, Mattia <1985&gt. "International Scientific Cooperation." Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/4723.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
In recent times the importance and opportunities a globalized science can offer have become more and more clear and needed. In a world struggling with economic depression, pollution, global warming, over population and looking for a reliable and unlimited source of energy capable of supporting the current needs, science and scientific knowledge needs to be at the center of every state policies. In this thesis I will first give an overview of the first years of international scientific cooperation and what it means for nations to work together. I will describe one of the first international cooperation, the Manhattan Project, and then move on to more recent time and how globalization has changes the way of doing science. Another important point I will take into consideration is the role science can play in international diplomacy, as a tool for nations to find common grounds and build something that can bring them closer. I will then move on to describe modern international cooperation projects, especially the ISS, being the most expensive international project ever started, and ITER, probably the world´s best chance at finding a reliable and durable solution to the energy problem. On ITER I will then focus on the creation of the project, thus analyzing the path that led to the signing of the agreement and of the Domestic Agencies as well as analyzing the problems the project has and is encountering. I will try to provide possible solutions for most of these problems, for the ITER project itself as well as for all future international scientific cooperation projects.
9

Knight, Amanda Margaret. "Students' abilities to critique scientific evidence when reading and writing scientific arguments." Thesis, Boston College, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104146.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Thesis advisor: Katherine L. McNeill
Scientific arguments are used to persuade others for explanations that make sense of the natural world. Over time, through the accumulation of evidence, one explanation for a scientific phenomenon tends to take precedence. In science education, arguments make students' thinking and reasoning visible while also supporting the development of their conceptual, procedural, and epistemic knowledge. As such, argumentation has become a goal within recent policy documents, including the Next Generation Science Standards, which, in turn, presents a need for comprehensive, effective, and scalable assessments. This dissertation used assessments that measure students' abilities to critique scientific evidence, which is measured in terms of the form of justification and the support of empirical evidence, when reading and writing scientific arguments. Cognitive interviews were then conducted with a subset of the students to explore the criteria they used to critique scientific evidence. Specifically, the research investigated what characteristics of scientific evidence the students preferred, how they critiqued both forms of justification and empirical evidence, and whether the four constructs represented four separate abilities. Findings suggest that students' prioritized the type of empirical evidence to the form of justification, and most often selected relevant-supporting justifications. When writing scientific arguments, most students constructed a justified claim, but struggled to justify their claims with empirical evidence. In comparison, when reading scientific arguments, students had trouble locating a justification when it was not empirical data. Additionally, it was more difficult for students to critique than identify or locate empirical evidence, and it was more difficult for students to identify than locate empirical evidence. Findings from the cognitive interviews suggest that students with more specific criteria tended to have more knowledge of the construct. Lastly, dimensional analyses suggest that these may not be four distinct constructs, which has important implications for curriculum development and instructional practice. Namely, teachers should attend to the critique of scientific evidence separately when reading and writing scientific arguments
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2015
Submitted to: Boston College. Lynch School of Education
Discipline: Teacher Education, Special Education, Curriculum and Instruction
10

Cutrufello, Gabriel. "Demonstrating Scientific Taste: Aesthetic Judgment, Scientific Ethos, and Nineteenth-Century American Science." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2012. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/167729.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
English
Ph.D.
This dissertation explores how aesthetic claims in scientific arguments help construct scientific ethos through demonstrations of the rhetor's judgment. By examining the works of Josiah Willard Gibbs and Henry Rowland, two prominent nineteenth-century American scientists, through the lens of their formal rhetorical training as students in American universities, this dissertation investigates how aesthetic judgment is enacted in scientific writing and explores the rhetorical history of the terms "simplicity," "brevity," "imagination," and "taste" and their use in scientific arguments. The aesthetic judgment that both scientists demonstrate in their written work reinforced an understanding of scientific ethos. By placing nineteenth-century scientific writing in contact with the rhetorical theories of the time, this dissertation explores the history of aesthetic judgment in rhetoric and its influence on conceptualizations of the faculty of taste. The dissertation illuminates the connections between rhetorical training and the ability to perform appropriate judgment when creating a reliable scientific ethos in writing. Constructing a scientific ethos in writing became increasingly important and complicated during the time of great institutional change in scientific research, which occurred during the second half of the nineteenth century in America. Scientists constructed scientific ethos through demonstrations of aesthetic judgment in order to respond to the exigencies of both institutional pressures and disciplinary expectations.
Temple University--Theses
Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Scientific":

1

Blackwell, John. A scientific approach to scientific writing. New York: Springer, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Blackwell, John, and Jan Martin. A Scientific Approach to Scientific Writing. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9788-3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Bagby, Susan. Einführung in Scientific WorkPlace, Scientific Word, und Scientific Notebook: Version 4.0. Bainbridge Island, Wa: MacKichan Software Inc., 2001.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Youngson, R. M. Scientific dumbology. London [England]: Magpie Books, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Hunter, Roger. Getting started with Scientific WorkPlace, Scientific Word, and Scientific Notebook: Version 3.5. Bainbridge Island, Wash: MacKichan Software Inc., 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Bokulich, Alisa, and Peter Joshua Martin Bokulich. Scientific structuralism. Edited by SpringerLink (Online service). New York: Springer Verlag, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Zoysa, G. H. De. Scientific astrology. Dehiwala, [Sri Lanka]: Siridevi Printers, 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Johnston, Howard Agnew. Scientific faith. Chicago, Ill: Winona Publ. Co., 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

International Symposium of Biomechanics in Sports (17th 1999 Perth, W.A.). Scientific proceedings. Edited by Sanders Ross, Gibson Barry J, International Society of Biomechanics in Sports., and Edith Cowan University. Perth, W.A: School of Biomedical and Sports Science, Edith Cowan University, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Gonnet, G. H. Scientific computation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Scientific":

1

McComas, William F. "Scientific Method (Scientific Methodology)." In The Language of Science Education, 93. Rotterdam: SensePublishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_83.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Bährle-Rapp, Marina. "scientific." In Springer Lexikon Kosmetik und Körperpflege, 496. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71095-0_9208.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Torretti, Roberto. "‘Scientific Realism’ and Scientific Practice." In The Reality of the Unobservable, 113–22. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9391-5_6.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Dorato, Mauro, and Laura Felline. "Scientific Explanation and Scientific Structuralism." In Scientific Structuralism, 161–76. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9597-8_9.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Heuss, Theodor. "Scientific Work and Scientific Polemics." In Anton Dohrn, 178–85. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76347-2_23.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Ludäscher, Bertram. "What Makes Scientific Workflows Scientific?" In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 217. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02279-1_16.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Greenwood, John D. "Scientific Empiricism and Scientific Psychology." In Explanation and Experiment in Social Psychological Science, 1–28. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1989. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-8801-2_1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Harker, David. "Scientific Progress and Scientific Realism." In New Philosophical Perspectives on Scientific Progress, 275–92. New York: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003165859-18.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Park, Seungbae. "Scientific Realism and Scientific Progress." In Embracing Scientific Realism, 155–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87813-9_8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Park, Seungbae. "Scientific Realism and Scientific Practice." In Embracing Scientific Realism, 201–20. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87813-9_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Scientific":

1

Bertin, Marc. "Scientific Monitoring by Mining Scientific Papers." In the 6th International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2668260.2668306.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Vasconcelos, Clara, Alexandra Cardoso, and Maria Luisa Vasconcelos. "SOCIO-SCIENTIFIC ISSUES AND SCIENTIFIC LITERACY." In 11th annual International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation. IATED, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2018.0034.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

"Scientific Committee." In 2019 International Colloquium on Logistics and Supply Chain Management (LOGISTIQUA). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/logistiqua.2019.8907251.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

"Scientific committee." In 2015 Sixth International Conference of Cognitive Science (ICCS). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cogsci.2015.7426659.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

"Scientific committee." In 2016 Fourth International Conference on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Technologies (MMWaTT). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mmwatt.2016.7869934.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

"Scientific committee." In 2012 Second Conference on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Technologies (MMWaTT). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mmwatt.2012.6532172.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

"Scientific committee." In 2014 Third Conference on Millimeter-Wave and Terahertz Technologies (MMWATT). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mmwatt.2014.7057215.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

"Scientific committee." In 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/idap.2017.8090160.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

"Scientific Committee." In 2017 Palestinian International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (PICICT). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/picict.2017.36.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

"Scientific reviewers." In 2014 17th Oriental Chapter of the International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardization of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (COCOSDA). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icsda.2014.7051403.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "Scientific":

1

Critchlow, T. J., L. Liu, C. Pu, A. Gupta, B. Ludaescher, I. Altintas, M. Vouk, D. Bitzer, M. Singh, and D. Rosnick. Scientific Data Management Center Scientific Data Integration. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/15003250.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Noyes, H. Scientific Eschatology. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/839932.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

SARACHIK, MYRIAM P. Scientific/Technical Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1140147.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Finnerty, Caine. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/923209.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Kahan, W. Scientific Computing Environments. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada191239.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Zelenay, Piotr, Xi Yin, and Edward F. Holby. w19_OMEC Scientific Highlight. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), April 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1608677.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Pfleger, Brian F. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1508649.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Evan Abramson. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/958052.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Khalil, Munira. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1576203.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Stephan, K. D. Final Scientific Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/875918.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

До бібліографії