Готові списки джерел за темами / Scholarly practices

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Scholarly practices"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 7 липня 2024

Оновлено: 7 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Scholarly practices".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Scholarly practices":

Pertsas, Vayianos, and Panos Constantopoulos. "Scholarly Ontology: modelling scholarly practices." International Journal on Digital Libraries 18, no. 3 (May 4, 2016): 173–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00799-016-0169-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Shehata, Ahmed Maher khafaga, David Ellis, and Allen Foster. "The impact of information and communication technologies on informal scientific communication." Library Review 64, no. 6/7 (September 7, 2015): 428–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/lr-09-2014-0102.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Purpose – This study aims to accomplish three objectives: first, to investigate the role and impact of information and communication technologies on the practice of science in the UK; second, to examine and characterise changes in scholarly communication activities such as information seeking, publishing and collaboration; and third, to investigate the validity of the current scholarly communication models and to determine whether there is a need for a new model. Design/methodology/approach – The study deployed a naturalistic inquiry approach using semi-structured interviews as a qualitative research tool. A theoretical sample of 40 researchers in four universities were interviewed to gather data regarding informal scholarly communication practices, factors that affect the researchers’ decisions and changes in the scholarly communication system. Findings – The results of the interviews suggest that there are three types of scholars who engage in scholarly communication activities. First, the “orthodox scholar”, who only uses formal and traditional scholarly communication approaches. Second, the “moderate scholar”, who prioritises formal communication approaches but, at the same time, is trying to get benefits from informal channels. Finally, the “heterodox scholar”, who uses all channels available in scholarly communication. The study also proposes a model of scholarly communication that reflects the current changes in scholarly research. Research limitations/implications – The paper describes the changes in informal scholarly communication practices in four universities in the UK. However, because the study used a naturalistic inquiry approach, the results cannot be generalised to a different population. Originality/value – There is limited literature investigating the changes in informal scholarly communication practices. The value of the current study lies in being the first study in this area that uses a naturalistic inquiry approach to investigate the changes in informal scholarly communication practices, and to develop a new model of scholarly communication.

Wildemuth, Barbara M. "The Types of Publications Read by Finnish Scholars Vary with Their Purposes for Reading." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 15, no. 1 (March 13, 2020): 229–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/eblip29667.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

A Review of: Late, E., Tenopir, C., Talja, S., & Christian, L. (2019). Reading practices in scholarly work: From articles and books to blogs. Journal of Documentation, 75(3), 478-499. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-11-2018-0178 Abstract Objective – To closely examine the role of reading in scholarly work, with particular attention to the relationships between reading practices and characteristics of the scholars, the types of publications they read, and the context of reading. Design – Survey. Setting – Universities in Finland. Subjects – 528 academics (research directors/managers, professors, post doctoral researchers, doctoral students, lecturers, and researchers). Methods – An online survey was distributed in Finland, October-December 2016. The first part of the survey asked about scholars’ general reading practices; the second part asked about their most recent reading of two particular publications, one a journal article and the other a different publication type. In relation to these two readings, the scholars provided information about the documents read, the reading process and context, how the document was identified and obtained, and the effect of the reading on their work. Main Results – On average, the scholars read 59 publications per month: 20 journal articles, 3 books, 5 conference proceedings or research reports, 17 newspaper articles, 9 magazine articles, 4 blogs, and 2 non-fiction/fiction books. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of journal articles read across disciplines, but the number of books read was highest in the humanities and social sciences and lowest in the sciences and medical sciences. Frequency of reading of particular publication types also varied by work focus (research vs. teaching/administrative) and by the nature of the scholar’s research (basic vs. applied). The scholars were also asked about the importance of reading different publication types. Overall, scholarly journals and article compilations were rated as most important for scholarly reading. Differences in these ratings were found across disciplines, work focus, nature of the research, and scholar rank/status. Part 2 of the survey focused on the most recent items read by the scholars. Their reading of journal articles, scholarly books, and conference proceedings/research reports was mainly for the purpose of research and writing. Their reading of newspaper articles, magazine articles, and blogs was mainly for current awareness and continuing education. Their reading of non-fiction/fiction books was mainly for their personal interest or pleasure. None of these publication types was specifically focused on supporting the scholars’ teaching. Over 70 percent of the recent readings were new, rather than re-readings. Across all publication types, the scholars read at least parts of the item “with great care”. Almost half of the journal articles recently read have been or will be cited in the future; this proportion was also high for scholarly books and conference proceedings/research reports, but not for the other publication types. The most recently read journal articles were brought to the scholar’s attention primarily through searching; they became aware of scholarly books and conference proceedings/research reports through both searching and because another person told them about the item. Scholars mainly obtained journal articles and scholarly books from their libraries, but they also obtained articles on the Internet and scholarly books from another person. Forty percent of the scholars read journal articles by printing a downloaded copy, but over half read them on a computer, mobile phone, or e-reader. Over half of the scholarly books were read from published/printed copy, but 18% read the book in an electronic version. Most reading occured in the scholar’s office or lab. Over half the journal articles and conference proceedings/research reports read were published within the last year; just under half the scholarly books read were published within the last year. While these scholars worked in Finland, 91% of the journal articles and 73% of the scholarly books they read were published in English. Conclusion – The results from this study confirmed and extended findings from previous studies (e.g., Tenopir et al., 2010, 2015). They demonstrated that scholars read a variety of types of publications for a variety of purposes. However, journal articles still dominated the reading and the perceptions of importance among the various publication types, particularly for the purposes of research and writing. This paper provides a first look at scholars’ uses of the other publication types and the influence of work tasks on reading practices; further research is needed to understand these relationships more fully. In general, the disciplinary differences in reading practices found in this study mirror the different publishing practices of the disciplines and so may be affected by future evolution toward open access and social media use for scholarly communication.

Jensenius, Francesca R., Mala Htun, David J. Samuels, David A. Singer, Adria Lawrence, and Michael Chwe. "The Benefits and Pitfalls of Google Scholar." PS: Political Science & Politics 51, no. 4 (June 13, 2018): 820–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s104909651800094x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

ABSTRACTGoogle Scholar (GS) is an important tool that faculty, administrators, and external reviewers use to evaluate the scholarly impact of candidates for jobs, tenure, and promotion. This article highlights both the benefits of GS—including the reliability and consistency of its citation counts and its platform for disseminating scholarship and facilitating networking—and its pitfalls. GS has biases because citation is a social and political process that disadvantages certain groups, including women, younger scholars, scholars in smaller research communities, and scholars opting for risky and innovative work. GS counts also reflect practices of strategic citation that exacerbate existing hierarchies and inequalities. As a result, it is imperative that political scientists incorporate other data sources, especially independent scholarly judgment, when making decisions that are crucial for careers. External reviewers have a unique obligation to offer a reasoned, rigorous, and qualitative assessment of a scholar’s contributions and therefore should not use GS.

Poirier, Therese I., and Miranda Wilhelm. "Scholarly and Best Practices in Assessment." American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 82, no. 3 (April 2018): 6769. http://dx.doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6769.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Late, Elina, Carol Tenopir, Sanna Talja, and Lisa Christian. "Reading practices in scholarly work: from articles and books to blogs." Journal of Documentation 75, no. 3 (May 13, 2019): 478–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jd-11-2018-0178.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of reading in scholarly work among academics in Finland. This study analyzes readings from a variety of publication types including books, conference proceedings, research reports, magazines, newspapers, blogs, non-fiction and fiction. Design/methodology/approach An online survey was developed and distributed in Finland in 2016–2017 (n=528). Participants were asked their finding and use of scholarly information resources of all types. Findings Scholars read from a variety of publications. Different types of publications are read and used differently. Reading also varies between disciplines, ranks, work responsibilities and type of research performed. Research limitations/implications The study was a nationwide study of researchers in Finland; therefore, all findings are within the context of researchers in a single country. All results are self-reported; therefore, the authors assume but cannot be sure that respondents accurately recollect the specifics of their use of scholarly information. Practical implications The results of this study are relevant to publishers, research librarians, editors and others who serve consumers of scholarly information resources, design information products and services for those scholars, and seek to better understand the information needs and use of a variety of types of scholarly publications. Originality/value This study replicates previous studies in a variety of countries and provides a more up-to-date and single-country contextualized overview of how researchers find and use scholarly information in their work.

Beall, Jeffrey. "Unethical Practices in Scholarly, Open-Access Publishing." Journal of Information Ethics 22, no. 1 (April 1, 2013): 11–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3172/jie.22.1.11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Briggs, Charles L. "Metadiscursive Practices and Scholarly Authority in Folkloristics." Journal of American Folklore 106, no. 422 (1993): 387. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/541905.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Shehata, Ahmed, David Ellis, and Allen Foster. "Scholarly communication trends in the digital age." Electronic Library 33, no. 6 (November 2, 2015): 1150–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/el-09-2014-0160.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate scholars’ attitudes toward informal publishing and dissemination to provide a view of the challenges and advantages of using such channels. Although considerable research has been carried out in relation to peer-reviewed scholarly publishing, relatively few studies have investigated the adoption of informal scholarly communication platforms in the scholarly publishing process. Design/methodology/approach – The paper deployed a grounded theory approach using semi-structured interviews as a qualitative research tool. A theoretical sample of 40 researchers in 4 universities were interviewed to gather data regarding informal publishing, platforms, factors that affect the researchers’ decision and the use of informal channels in dissemination. Findings – Results of the interviews suggest that there is an increasing trend among researchers toward informal publishing and dissemination throughout the scholarly communication cycle. The paper shows that there are three types of scholars who are involved in the scholarly communication process: conventional, modern and liberal scholars. Each of these scholars carries different beliefs regarding the scholarly communication process. Research limitations/implications – This paper was conducted on a relatively small sample of academic researchers, and therefore, the results cannot be easily generalized into a wider community of scholars. Originality/value – The paper provides insight into informal scholarly publishing practices using a grounded theory approach. This approach helped to capture the changes in both scholarly publishing practices and the adoption of informal techniques among the scholarly community.

Ren, Songsha, and Guangwei Hu. "Two Chinese medical doctors’ English scholarly publishing practices." Ibérica, no. 45 (June 7, 2023): 289–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.17398/2340-2784.45.289.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Against the backdrop of English being the academic lingua franca, Chinese medical doctors are under tremendous pressure to get their research published in English-medium journals. This paper reports on a multiple-case study of Chinese medical doctors’ scholarly publishing in English. Drawing on multiple types of data collected from two doctors at a major hospital affiliated with a top research-intensive university in mainland China, we explored the focal participants’ perspectives on their difficulties in scholarly publishing, their strategies for addressing these difficulties, and the factors and resources at work in their navigation of the publishing processes. Informed by Activity Theory, we identified contradictions within the doctors’ scholarly publishing activity systems. We focused on the rules and tools that framed the doctors’ scholarly publishing activities, and our findings revealed how they drew on an array of tools and signs to resolve the contradictions and meditate their scholarly publishing endeavors. Our study points to the need for institutional policies and initiatives to support Chinese medical doctors aspiring for international publication.

Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Scholarly practices":

Nobarany, Syavash. "Policies, practices, and potentials for computer-supported scholarly peer review." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/53979.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The scholarly peer-review process has been one of the cornerstones of science for centuries, but it has also been the subject of criticism for decades. The peer-review process is increasingly supported by computer systems; however, computer support for peer review has been mostly limited to facilitating traditional peer-review processes and remedying scalability issues. We took a holistic approach to understanding the peer-review process with the goal of devising computer-supported interactions, mechanisms, and processes for improving peer review. We conducted a series of studies to investigate various aspects of the peer-review process, including procedural fairness, anonymity and transparency, reviewing motivations, politeness of reviews, and opinion measurement. In the study of fairness, we learned about researchers’ attitudes and concerns about the fairness of the peer-review process. In the study of anonymity and transparency, we learned about the diversity of anonymity policies used by various publication venues. In the study of reviewing motivations, we learned the many reasons reviewers consider reviewing as part of their academic activities and what makes a review request more likely to be accepted. In the study of the use of politeness strategies, we learned about reviewers’ use of language for mitigating criticisms in a non-blind reviewing environment. In the study of opinion measurement we iteratively designed opinion measurement interfaces that can enhance elicitation of quantitative subjective opinions. Through these five studies, we expanded the understanding of challenges and opportunities for designing better peer-review processes and systems to support them, and we presented various ways through which computer support for peer review can be enhanced to address the identified challenges.
Science, Faculty of
Computer Science, Department of
Graduate

Kingsley, Danny Abigail, and danny kingsley@anu edu au. "The effect of scholarly communication practices on engagement with open access: An Australian study of three disciplines." The Australian National University. Centre for the Public Awareness of Science, 2009. http://thesis.anu.edu.au./public/adt-ANU20090713.173505.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This dissertation addresses a specific aspect of the broad area of communication systems used among researchers. This research has undertaken to establish a broader view of the communication practices of scholars to understand the motivations behind their publication choices. Open access offers a solution to issues with the scholarly publication system such as delays in publication and restricted visibility of research due to high subscription costs. The principle of open access is to enable maximum access to findings from publicly funded research to maximise social returns on public investments. Despite the apparent benefits of open access, the uptake has been limited. ¶ This thesis research takes a holistic view of the researcher as a communicator to uncover the reasons why researchers are making the publishing decisions they are. In-depth interviews were conducted with 43 researchers in three disciplines at two institutions, the Australian National University and the University of New South Wales. The disciplines, Chemistry, Sociology and Computer Science, were known to have different publication practices, The questions asked about all aspects of researcher communication including researching, authoring, informal communication, article submission, refereeing, mentoring and data storage. ¶ The findings show that traditional arguments for open access are ineffective. The Reward function of scholarly publishing is central to managing academic careers and supports traditional publishing systems. While having work openly accessible increases an academics exposure and possibly therefore their citation counts, unless alternative internet-based forms of metrics are adopted, the open access option will not directly appeal to researchers. ¶ Information-seeking behaviour demonstrates how disciplinary differences affect researchers interaction with technology. The disciplines showed marked differences in almost all the areas explored, and the behavioural norms expressed in each discipline have direct bearing on the likelihood of members of that discipline embracing open access. The institutional/disciplinary divide means that researchers must publish in ways that run counter to their disciplinary norms in order to satisfy institutional and grant funding requirements. ¶ Until governments, and particularly university administrations, recognise the need to consider the discipline and the need to consider the individual and respond to these needs, and until there is a realisation that different disciplines may require radically different approaches, there will not be a large-scale adoption by individual researchers of the current open access tools. Either institutional repositories need to adapt dramatically to offer work practice benefits or the broader academic population will only use institutional repositories under duress, which is not the situation envisaged by open access advocates. The alternative is for communities to develop their own subject-based repositories, a development that again is likely to be highly dependent on communication norms in different disciplines.

Ridge, Mia. "Making digital history : the impact of digitality on public participation and scholarly practices in historical research." Thesis, Open University, 2016. http://oro.open.ac.uk/45519/.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Following a broad overview of participatory digital history, this thesis moves from a review of public history projects focused on crowdsourcing, to a smaller sub-set of projects related to citizen history, and then focuses on the research practices of faculty and community historians. The Conclusion draws together the various models for ‘making history’ discussed, and teases out the ways in which they have been affected by digital methods, tools and resources. Chapter 1: An overview of participatory, digital history projects provides an overview of over 400 digital history projects that aim to engage the public and/or collect, create or enhance records about historical materials for scholarly and general audiences. This overview supplies context for the analysis of projects examined in greater detail in later chapters, and gives an indication of emerging norms or patterns of presenting and interacting with historical materials. Projects are grouped by their main tangible outputs, supporting a more nuanced understanding of the impact of different design choices. Chapter 2: History with the public: crowdsourcing discusses several design factors that may influence the success of crowdsourcing projects, including task design, the potential participant’s initial experience of a site, and the role of project marketing and communications in connecting to potential motivations for participation. It also analyses the role of participant forums and the provision of more complex tasks in keeping participants interested in a project. Following this, Chapter 3: History with the public: from microtasker to historian? explores how some crowdsourcing projects encourage deeper engagement with history or science. It investigates the project attributes that may help people learn historical skills, or even begin to ‘become historians’, through their participation in historical crowdsourcing projects. It suggests that there are three types of citizen history projects: crowdsourcing projects that accidentally support citizen history; crowdsourcing projects that hope for citizen history but are not built around it; and citizen history projects that can succeed only if participants are able to learn or bring some disciplinary skills to the more complex tasks that contribute to the projects’ goals. Projects that support citizen history do so by providing: opportunities for participants to actively engage with historical materials while undertaking meaningful tasks; access to both the historical materials and project data; access to a community similarly engaged with the meaningful goals of the wider project; and a visible and accessible expert presence. Chapter 4: Historians’ working practices and digital tools, resources and methods shifts our focus from public participation to scholarly practices in historical research. It presents the results of 29 interviews conducted in 2012 with faculty and community historians. It contributes empirical data on how faculty, family and local historians evaluate, use and contribute to ‘traditional’ and participative digital resources. It finds that community historians are generally more likely than faculty historians to engage in sharing data, but they are also still likely to be selective about the information they share publically. These interviews show the impact that digital tools, resources and methods have had on the processes of discovering, evaluating, gathering, creating, and sharing information for historical research. Finally, in Conclusion: The impact of digitality on public participation and scholarly practices in history, I consider the impact of the digital projects, platforms and paradigms discussed in previous chapters on public participation and scholarly practices in historical research. Through an examination of the results of the interviews and analyses of participatory history projects, I argue that digitality has already enhanced many historical practices and has increased the number of those engaged in making history. Supporting material is provided in three Appendices. Appendix A, Websites reviewed, lists the titles and URLs for the websites I reviewed for my research. Appendix B, Interview participants, contains a summary of interview participants, including relevant demographic information. Appendix C, Interview and survey questions, provides the interview scripts used in the semi-structured interviews with family, local and faculty historians, a script written for interviews with project stakeholders, and survey text.

4

Benishek, Paul Sheinman Benjamin. "Achieving better acquisition through ADR and other best practices for resolving bid protests." Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2009. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/MBAPR/2009/Dec/09Dec%5FBenishek%5FMBA.pdf.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
"Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration from the Naval Postgraduate School, December 2009."
Advisor(s): Kidalov, Max V. ; Franck, Raymond E. "December 2009." "MBA Professional report"--Cover. Description based on title screen as viewed on January 26, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: Bid Protests, acquisition process, best practices, alternative dispute resolution, Federal Agencies, Defense Contracting. Includes bibliographical references (p. 87-88). Also available in print.

5

Engin, Mehmet Koc Osman. "Improving the small-business role in Turkish defense acquisitions recommendations from U.S. best practices /." Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2010. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/MBAPR/2010/Jun/10Jun%5FEngin%5FMBA.pdf.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
"Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration from the Naval Postgraduate School, June 2010."
Advisor(s): Kidalov, Max ; Second Reader: Yoder, E. Cory. "June 2010." "MBA Professional report"--Cover. Description based on title screen as viewed on July 14, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: Small Businesses, Small Business share from federal procurements, Small and Medium-Sized small businesses (SME), Small business administration (SBA), History of small businesses Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-105). Also available in print.

6

Haley, Ryan C. Haley Ryan C. Fox Shane M. Klotzbach Roy Michael. "Best practices in the Navy's energy programs strategic communication factors operating in the tactical forces." Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2009. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/MBAPR/2009/Dec/09Dec%5FHaley%5FMBA.pdf.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
"Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Business Administration from the Naval Postgraduate School, December 2009."
Advisor(s): King, Cynthia. ; Salem, Anita. "December 2009." "MBA Professional report"--Cover. Description based on title screen as viewed on April 12, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: Energy Conservation; Strategic Communication; U.S. Navy Energy Conservation Programs; Motivations; Incentives; Behavior Change Includes bibliographical references (p. 83-87). Also available in print.

7

Samupwa, Astridah Njala. "Adopting research data management (RDM) practices at the University of Namibia (UNAM): a view from researchers." Master's thesis, Faculty of Humanities, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/31205.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
This study investigated the extent of Research Data Management (RDM) adoption at the University of Namibia (UNAM), viewing it from the researcher’s perspective. The objectives of the study were to investigate the extent to which RDM has been adopted as part of the research process at UNAM, to identify challenges encountered by researchers attempting to practice RDM and to provide solutions to some of the challenges identified. Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation (DOI) theory was adopted for the study to place UNAM within an innovation-decision process stage. The study took a quantitative approach of which a survey was used. A stratified sample was drawn from a list of all 948 faculty members (the number of academics taken from the UNAM annual report of 2016). The Raosoft sample size calculator (Raosoft, 2004) states that 274 is the minimum recommended sample size necessary for a 5% margin of error and a 95% confidence level from a population of 948, and this was the intended sample size. A questionnaire administered via an online web-based software tool, SurveyMonkey, was used. A series of questions was asked to individuals to obtain statistically useful information on the topic under study. The paid version of SurveyMonkey was used for analysis while graphics and tables were created in Microsoft Excel. The results of the study showed that for the group that responded to the survey, the extent to which they have adopted RDM practices is still very low. Although individuals were found to be managing their research data, this was done out of their own free will; this is to say that there was no policy mandating and guiding their practices. The researcher placed most of the groups that responded to the survey at the first stage of the innovation-decision process, which is the information stage. However, librarians who responded to the survey were found to be more advanced as they were seen to be aware of and engaged in knowledge acquisition regarding RDM practices. Thus, the researcher placed them at the second stage in the innovation-decision process (Persuasion). Recommendations for the study are based on the analysed data. It is recommended, among others, that UNAM should give directives in the form of policies to enhance the adoption of RDM practices and this should be communicated to the entire UNAM community to create awareness regarding the concept of RDM.

8

Hammarfelt, Björn. "Following the Footnotes : A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Literary Studies." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-170504.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
This thesis provides an in-depth study of the possibilities of applying bibliometric methods to the research field of literary studies. The four articles that constitute the backbone of this thesis focus on different aspects of references and citations in literary studies: from the use of references in the text to citation patterns among 34 literature journals. The analysis covers both an Anglo-Saxon context as well as research in Swedish literary studies, and the materials used include Web of Science data, references in the Swedish literature journal TFL (Tidskrift för Litteraturvetenskap) and applications to the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet). A study is also made of the influence of one single publication—Walter Benjamin’s Illuminations—and its impact in literary studies and in wider academia. The results from the four articles are elaborated upon using a theoretical framework that focuses on differences in the social and intellectual organization of research fields. According to these theories literary studies can be described as a fragmented, heterogenic, interdisciplinary and ‘rural’ field with a diverse audience. The fragmented and rural organization of the field is reflected in low citation frequencies as well as in the difficulties in discerning research specialities in co-citation mappings, while the analysis of the intellectual base (highly cited authors) is an example of the heterogenic and interdisciplinary character of the field, as it includes authors from many fields across the humanities and the social sciences. The thesis emphasizes that bibliometric studies of research fields in the humanities need to incorporate non-English and non-journal publications in order to produce valid and fair results. Moreover, bibliometric methods must be modified in accordance with the organization of research in a particular field, and differences in referencing practices and citation patterns ought to be considered. Consequently, it is advised that bibliometric measures for evaluating research in these fields should, if used at all, be applied with great caution.
© Björn Hammarfelt 2012

9

Pilerot, Ola. "Design researchers' information sharing : the enactment of a discipline." Doctoral thesis, Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-3693.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
This thesis is about information sharing in interdisciplinary research practices. It reports one conceptual and three empirical studies. The studies have been conducted through focusing on the field of design research, and in particular on a Nordic network of design researchers. From a practice-based perspective, the exploration of the study object oscillates between three nested and interconnected frames. The main contribution of this thesis is that it illustrates how activities of information sharing not only contribute to, but actually play a central role in the shaping of the practice of design research. It is shown how information sharing works as a contributor to the development, maintenance and shaping of practices in 1) design research as it is conducted in the Nordic network; 2) in the field of design research; and 3) within interdisciplinary research. Without losing sight of the empirical material, the theoretical analysis has made it possible to illuminate the connection between activities of sharing and the enactment of a discipline. Through analysis and discussion of the four studies as a whole, the reciprocal relationship between information sharing and the area of design research is elucidated. It is shown how information sharing, as it emerges in this interdisciplinary practice, functions as a unifying force towards the probable goal of establishing a discipline.
Academic dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Library and Information Science at the University of Borås to be publicly defended on Friday 25 April 2014 at 13:00 in lecture room E310, the University of Borås Allégatan 1, Borås.

10

Elbayadi, Moudy E. "Relational Leadership, DevOps, and The Post-PC Era: Toward a Practical Theory for 21st Century Technology Leaders." Antioch University / OhioLINK, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=antioch1411256710.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Scholarly practices":

1

Grafton, Anthony, and Glenn W. Most, eds. Canonical Texts and Scholarly Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316226728.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

McCulloch, Sharon. Novice LGBTQ+ Scholars’ Practices in Writing for Scholarly Publication. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003274193.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Bittman, Marilyn. Best practices guide to scholarly publishing. Vancouver: Canadian Association of Learned Journals, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Bittman, Marilyn. Best practices guide to scholarly publishing. Vancouver, BC: Canadian Association of Learned Journals, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Group, Primary Research. Survey of scholarly journal licensing & acquisition practices. 2nd ed. New York: Primary Research Group, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Habibie, Pejman, and Ismaeil Fazel. Predatory Practices in Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Sharing. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003170723.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Habibie, Pejman, and Robert Kohls. Narratives and Practices of Mentorship in Scholarly Publication. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003274131.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Wet, Corene de. A scholarly inquiry into disciplinary practices in educational institutions. Durbanville: AOSIS, 2019.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Cargill, Margaret, and Sally Burgess, eds. Publishing Research in English as an Additional Language: Practices, Pathways and Potentials. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide Press, 2017.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Hollylynne, Lee, and Mewborn Denise, eds. Scholarly practices and inquiry in the preparation of mathematics teachers. San Diego, CA: Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Scholarly practices":

1

Crawford, Matthew R. "Scholarly practices." In Producing Christian Culture, 65–88. New York : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315602301-4.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Jalongo, Mary Renck, and Olivia N. Saracho. "Promoting Ethical Practices: Stakeholders and Publishers." In Scholarly Writing, 165–88. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_8.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Heider, Kelly. "Writing the Literature Review: Common Mistakes and Best Practices." In Scholarly Writing, 41–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39516-1_3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Habibie, Pejman, and Ismaeil Fazel. "Predatory Practices and Scholarly Communication." In Predatory Practices in Scholarly Publishing and Knowledge Sharing, 233–43. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003170723-19.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Carciu, Oana Maria. "Juggling Early-Career Demands: Research Publication Productivity, Strategies, Practices." In Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-career Scholars, 23–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4_2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

McCulloch, Sharon. "About scholarly publication and early-career LGBTQ+ scholars." In Novice LGBTQ+ Scholars’ Practices in Writing for Scholarly Publication, 1–11. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003274193-1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Darvin, Ron. "The Digitally-Mediated Scholar: Online Identities and Investment in the Discursive Practices of an Academic Community." In Scholarly Publication Trajectories of Early-career Scholars, 169–88. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85784-4_10.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Hartse, Joel Heng, and Ismaeil Fazel. "Peer Mentorship in Scholarly Publication." In Narratives and Practices of Mentorship in Scholarly Publication, 85–99. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003274131-8.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Torres-Purroy, Helena, and Sònia Mas-Alcolea. "The perpetuation of heteropatriarchal dynamics in scholarly gatekeeping." In Novice LGBTQ+ Scholars’ Practices in Writing for Scholarly Publication, 44–62. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003274193-5.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Ross, Micky. "Fighting for authenticity along the LGBTQ+ journey towards scholarly publication." In Novice LGBTQ+ Scholars’ Practices in Writing for Scholarly Publication, 15–30. New York: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003274193-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Scholarly practices":

1

Edwards, Phillip M. "Representing publication and distribution practices for scholarly materials." In the 2009 joint international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1555400.1555474.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

"Workshop: Emerging Online Tools to Enhance Scholarly Reputation and Visibility." In InSITE 2019: Informing Science + IT Education Conferences: Jerusalem. Informing Science Institute, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.28945/4342.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
Aim/Purpose: Being noticed as a scholar is becoming increasingly difficult as publication outlets proliferate and the number of scholars grows. The purpose of this workshop is to explore the use of online academic profiles to enhance the reputation and visibility of scholars. Background: A scholar's reputation is built by garnering the attention of peer experts capable of judging the credibility of their work. Online academic profiles provide a way for scholars to increase awareness of their achievements. Methodology: This workshop provides an overview of various online academic profile plat-forms, demonstrates how profiles are created, recommends best practices for profile maintenance, discusses issues surrounding profile trustworthiness, and reports future trends in the context of recent shifts among organizations sponsoring online academic profiles. Contribution: Online academic profiles have been available for over a decade, but patterns of use are inconsistent. This workshop enables participants to leverage academic profiles to better understand and enhance their scholarly reputation. Findings: Even though researchers express reservation about current implementations of online academic profiles, they believe these profiles are becoming increasingly important as a way for scholars to manage reputation, visibility, and recognition. Recommendation for Researchers: To increase stature in the digital age, scholars are encouraged to create and maintain a robust online professional persona. Impact on Society: Online academic profiles enable scholars to make themselves and their work more visible, increasing the utility of valuable research that might otherwise remain inaccessible or obscure. Future Research: Future research should continue to explore how scholars use online academic profiles, as well as the impact of profiles on research opportunities, collaborative exchange, recognition, and visibility.

3

Gleason, Benjamin. "Techno-Ethics, Twitter, and Scholarly Practices: Opportunities for Emerging Scholars to Learn Through Social Media." In 2021 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1687582.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Rieg, Robert, and Patrick Ulrich. "The effect of management practice on performance: The moderating role of ownership." In Corporate governance: Fundamental and challenging issues in scholarly research. Virtus Interpress, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cgfcisrp12.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
While scholars agree that ownership matters for firm performance in general, the detailed effects are still debated. We argue that ownership impacts firm performance not only directly but also through implementing different levels of management practice that impact firm performance too. We show that interactions between ownership and management practice have positive and negative effects on firm performance depending on how different owners can exploit the benefits of management practices or not. In that sense, ownership moderates the effect of management practices on performance

5

Ince, Sharon Favaro, Christopher Hoadley, and Paul A. Kirschner. "A Study of Search Practices in Doctoral Student Scholarly Workflows." In the 2018 Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3176349.3176877.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Moskaleva, Olga V., and Vladimir V. Pislyakov. "Russian Scholarly Journals in Emerging Sources Citation Index." In World-Class Scientific Publication – 2017: Best Practices in Preparation and Promotion of Publications. ASEP; NP “NEICON”; Ural University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24069/2017.978-5-7996-2227-5.13.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Cagle, Lauren, Michelle Eble, Meredith Johnson, Nathan R. Johnson, Liz Lane, Temptaous Mckoy, Kristen R. Moore, et al. "Participatory Coalition Building: Creating an Anti-Racist Scholarly Reviewing Practices Heuristic." In SIGDOC '21: The 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3472714.3473654.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Najmi, Anjum, and Scott Lancaster. "Engaging Graduate Students in Research and Scholarly Life Cycle Practices: Localized Modeling of Scholarly Communication for Alignment with Strategic Initiatives." In Library Assessment Conference—Building Effective, Sustainable, Practical Assessment. Association of Research Libraries, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/lac.2018.46.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Popova, Natalia G., Anatoly V. Merenkov, and Denis V. Shkurin. "Problems of Adaptation of Russian Scholarly Journals to International Publication Standards." In World-Class Scientific Publication – 2017: Best Practices in Preparation and Promotion of Publications. ASEP; NP “NEICON”; Ural University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24069/2017.978-5-7996-2227-5.19.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Trebicka, Brunela. "Understanding governance dynamics and success factors in family-owned businesses: A focus on corporate governance in family firms." In New outlooks for the scholarly research in corporate governance. Virtus Interpress, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/nosrcgp19.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
Family firms represent a significant segment of the global economy, and their unique governance challenges have garnered increasing attention. This study provides a comprehensive examination of corporate governance in family firms, aiming to shed light on the dynamics, mechanisms, and success factors that shape effective governance practices. Through a literature review, key findings emerge regarding the influence of family dynamics on governance, the importance of balancing family and business interests, and the role of specific governance mechanisms such as boards and family councils. The study highlights the criticality of effective communication, transparency, and professionalization in family firm governance, along with the separation of ownership and management. Moreover, the implications of succession planning and leadership development, as well as the integration of family values and culture, are explored. Practical implications for family firms are discussed, emphasizing the need for strategic decision-making, accountability, and long-term sustainability. Furthermore, potential future research directions are suggested, including investigating communication strategies, examining the impact of different governance structures, and exploring the role of technology in family firm governance. This study contributes to the understanding of corporate governance in family firms and provides a foundation for guiding family firms toward effective governance practices and long-term success.

Звіти організацій з теми "Scholarly practices":

1

Beall, Jeffrey. Corrupt and questionable practices in the scholarly publishing industry. International Society of Managing & Technical Editors, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.25261/ir00000034.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Afolayan, Anthony, Roumen Anguelov, Don Cowan, Maryke Labuschagne, Natasha Sacks, and Edilegnaw Wale Zegeye. Report on Grouped Peer Review of Scholarly Journals in Mathematics and Science. Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2021/0075.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
The peer review report entitled Report on Grouped Peer Review of Scholarly Journals in Mathematics and Science is the 12th in a series of discipline-grouped evaluations of South African scholarly journals. This is part of a scholarly assurance process initiated by the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). The process is centered on multi-perspective, discipline-based evaluation panels appointed by the Academy Council on the recommendation of the Academy’s Committee on Scholarly Publishing in South Africa (CSPiSA). This detailed report presents the peer review panel’s consolidated consensus reports on each journal and provides the panel’s recommendations in respect of DHET accreditation, inclusion on the SciELO SA platform and suggestions for improvement in general. The main purpose of the ASSAf review process for journals is to improve the scholarly publication in the country that is consonant with traditional scholarly practices.

3

Burger, Philippe, Chris Callaghan, Margaret Chitiga-Mabugu, David Coldwell, Rangan Gupta, Roula Inglesi-Lotz, Habofanwe Koloba, et al. Report on Grouped Peer Review of Scholarly Journals in Economics and Business Management. Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf), 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/assaf.2022/0079.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
The peer review report titled 'Report on Grouped Peer Review of Scholarly Journals in Economics and Business Management' is the 13th in a series of discipline-grouped evaluations of South African scholarly journals. This is part of a scholarly assurance process initiated by the Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). The process is centered on multi-perspective, discipline-based evaluation panels appointed by the Academy Council on the recommendation of the Academy’s Committee on Scholarly Publishing in South Africa (CSPiSA). This detailed report presents the peer review panel’s consolidated consensus reports on each journal and provides the panel’s recommendations in respect of DHET accreditation, inclusion on the SciELO SA platform and suggestions for improvement in general. The main purpose of the ASSAf review process for journals is to improve the scholarly publication in the country that is consonant with traditional scholarly practices.

4

Li, Chan, Becky Miller, and Mohamed Hamed. Library Impact Research Report: Open Access Publishing: A Study of UC Berkeley Faculty Views and Practices. Association of Research Libraries, January 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.29242/report.ucberkeley2023.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
As part of ARL’s Research Library Impact Framework initiative, a team at the University of California (UC) Berkeley Library studied the relationship between faculty’s attitudes toward open access (OA) and their OA publishing practices, including the roles of funding availability and discipline. The project team compared UC Berkeley faculty’s answers to questions related to OA from the 2018 Ithaka S+R Faculty Survey with the faculty’s scholarly output in the Scopus database. The study focused on gold OA articles, which usually require authors to pay article processing charges (APCs) and which accounted for 18% of the publications in the sample. Overall, the UC Berkeley study found a positive correlation between publishing gold OA and the faculty’s support for OA (no cost to read). In contrast, the correlation between publishing gold OA and the faculty’s concern about publishing cost was weak. Publishing costs concerned faculty in all subject areas, whether or not their articles reported research funding. Thus, UC Berkeley Library’s efforts to pursue transformative publishing agreements and prioritize funding for a program subsidizing publishing fees seem like effective strategies to increase OA.

5

Ruhf, Kathryn, and Kate Clancy. A Regional Imperative: The Case for Regional Food Systems. Thomas A. Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems, September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5304/lyson.2022.001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
‘Regional food systems’ appears with increasing frequency in scholarly works and among food system practitioners. Yet regional food systems are understudied and undervalued. Much more attention to regionalism and regional food systems is necessary to create more sustainable, equitable, and resilient food systems for all. Building from the authors’ 2010 paper, “It takes a region… Exploring a regional food systems approach: A working paper,” this greatly expanded report explores the concepts, practices, challenges, and promise of regional food systems. The report’s focus is on the Northeast U.S., a laboratory for regional food systems thinking and action, but it also describes and gives examples of regional food systems development across the country. The arguments in favor of regional approaches and explorations apply to all regions and embracing them could not be more imperative to address contemporary conditions.

6

Cooper, Danielle, Sarah Bankston, Marianne Stowell Bracke, Beth Callahan, Hui-Fen Chang, Leslie Delserone, Florian Diekmann, et al. Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Agriculture Scholars. Ithaka S+R, June 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.303663.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Agrawal, Asha Weinstein, Evelyn Blumenberg, Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris, and Brittney Lu. Understanding Workforce Diversity in the Transit Industry: Establishing a Baseline of Diversity Demographics. Mineta Transportation Institute, February 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.31979/mti.2024.2213.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:
This study provides baseline data on the status of the racial/ethnic and gender diversity of the transit agency workforce in the U.S. and identifies potential barriers and promising practices for diversifying this workforce. Public transit agencies function best when the diversity of their workforce represents the communities they serve, yet previous research finds an underrepresentation of women and minorities in senior and managerial roles, along with an overconcentration of men and workers of color—particularly Black workers—in operational roles (e.g., drivers, janitors). The study updates those earlier studies with newer data drawn from five discrete research tasks: 1) review of the scholarly and professional literature on the topic; 2) review of the websites of the 50 largest transit operators; 3) analysis of employee demographic data submitted by 152 transit operators as part of Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) program plans; 4) analysis of responses to an original survey sent to the human resources personnel of transit agencies (92 responses from staff at 68 agencies), and 5) interviews with 12 professionals selected for their expertise in transportation workforce diversity monitoring, management, and/or advocacy.

8

Cooper, Danielle, Roger Schonfeld, Richard Adams, Matthew Baker, Nisa Bakkalbasi, John Bales, Rebekah Bedard, et al. Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Religious Studies Scholars. Ithaka S+R, February 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.294119.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Cooper, Danielle, Katherine Daniel, Caitlin Bakker, Andrea Ball, Jaime Blanck, Chris Childs, Ann Gleason, et al. Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Public Health Scholars. Ithaka S+R, December 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.305867.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Cooper, Danielle, Katherine Daniel, Jade Alburo, Deepa Banerjee, Tomoko Bialock, Hong Cheng, Su Chen, et al. Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Asian Studies Scholars. Ithaka S+R, June 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.307642.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

До бібліографії

Ми використовуємо кукі для покращення роботи сервісу. Дізнатися більше