We are proudly a Ukrainian website. Our country was attacked by Russian Armed Forces on Feb. 24, 2022.
You can support the Ukrainian Army by following the link: https://u24.gov.ua/.
Even the smallest donation is hugely appreciated!
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Revegetation".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Rocket and spinach baby leaves are valuable commodities since they are basic components of popular ready-made salads. Two methods may follow after harvesting: establishment of new cultivations or successive revegetations and harvests. This study aimed to investigate the yield and nutritional value of rocket and spinach baby leaves after individual cultivations or successive revegetations in a floating system to improve their production strategy. The crops were cultivated in a greenhouse for seven weeks using a floating system with an adjusted nutrient solution. The leaves were either harvested and immediately replaced with a new set of plants (control) or harvested and placed again in the same tank in order to revegetate (revegetation). Revegetated rocket baby leaves in five cuts produced similar yield, with greater antioxidant capacity (DPPH scavenging activity) and total phenolic content, and greater nitrate content (eight times below the maximum allowed by EU) compared to control. Revegetated spinach produced more yield with enhanced antioxidant activity and total phenolic content and the same nitrate content compared to the control. Colour was not affected in either crop, thus eliminating the possibility for market rejection. Production efficiency was increased, as shown by the yields and the reduced resources provided in the revegetation tank. Thus, successive harvesting and revegetation are suggested for increased production efficiency and quality of rocket and spinach baby leaves.
2
Sheley, Roger L., Edward A. Vasquez, Anna-Marie Chamberlain, and Brenda S. Smith. "Landscape-Scale Rehabilitation of Medusahead (Taeniatherum caput-medusae)-Dominated Sagebrush Steppe." Invasive Plant Science and Management 5, no. 4 (December 2012): 436–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/ipsm-d-12-00030.1.
AbstractProducers facing infestations of invasive annual grasses regularly voice the need for practical revegetation strategies that can be applied across broad landscapes. Our objective was to determine the potential for scaling up the single-entry approach for revegetating medusahead-infested rangeland to broader, more heterogeneous landscape-scale revegetation of winter annual grass–infested rangeland. We hypothesized, when applied on a highly variable landscape scale, the combination of imazapic and seeding would provide highest abundance of perennial grasses and lowest amount of annual grasses. Treatments included a control, seeding of crested wheatgrass (‘Hycrest’) and Sandberg's bluegrass, spraying (60 g ai ha−1 imazapic), and a simultaneously applied combination of spraying and seeding. The HyCrest and Sandberg's bluegrass seeding rates were 19 and 3.4 kg ha−1, respectively. The treatments were applied to large plots (1.4 to 8 ha) and replicated five times, with each replication located in different watersheds throughout southeastern Oregon. This study shows that the single-entry approach can be scaled up to larger landscapes, but variation within establishment areas will likely be high. This procedure should reduce the costs over multientry treatment applications and make revegetating annual grass–infested rangeland across landscapes more affordable.
3
Kocsis, Erika N., Ronald F. Hooks, and James N. McCrimmon. "Comparison of Nine Native Grasses Grown on Sludge Applied Soil." HortScience 30, no. 4 (July 1995): 862C—862. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.30.4.862c.
The use of grasses native to New Mexico are preferred for revegetating Albuquerque's sewage sludge disposal site. A greenhouse study was conducted to determine the most appropriate grass species that could be used in revegetation. Nine grasses grown in soil collected at Albuquerque's sludge disposal site were compared based on germination measurements, including plant height and density. Final shoot and root weights also were taken for comparison. Plant tissue was analyzed for the accumulation of metals and salts. With 200 ml of water applied weekly, plant height was greatest in spike dropseed (Sporobolus contractus A. S. Hitchc.) at 33.86 cm; plant density was greatest in alkali sacaton (Sporobolus airoides Torr.). Results indicate the grasses that have the best potential for use in revegetation are blue grama [Bouteloua gracilis (H.B.K.) Lag. ex Griffiths], sideoats grama [Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr.], and alkali sacaton.
4
Booth, D. Terrance, and Kenneth P. Vogel. "Revegetation Priorities." Rangelands 28, no. 5 (October 2006): 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2111/1551-501x(2006)28[24:rp]2.0.co;2.
Jordan, Rebecca, Martin F. Breed, Suzanne M. Prober, Adam D. Miller, and Ary A. Hoffmann. "How well do revegetation plantings capture genetic diversity?" Biology Letters 15, no. 10 (October 2019): 20190460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2019.0460.
Revegetation plantings are a key management tool for ecological restoration. Revegetation success is usually measured using ecological traits, however, genetic diversity should also be considered as it can influence fitness, adaptive capacity and long-term viability of revegetation plantings and ecosystem functioning. Here we review the global literature comparing genetic diversity in revegetation plantings to natural stands. Findings from 48 studies suggest variable genetic outcomes of revegetation, with 46% demonstrating higher genetic diversity in revegetation than natural stands and 52% demonstrating lower diversity. Levels of genetic diversity were most strongly associated with the number of source sites used—where information was available, 69% of studies showing higher genetic diversity in revegetation reported using multiple provenances, compared with only 33% for those with lower diversity. However, with a few exceptions, it was unclear whether differences in genetic diversity between revegetation and natural stands were statistically significant. This reflected insufficient reporting of statistical error and metadata within the published studies, which limited conclusions about factors contributing to patterns. Nonetheless, our findings indicate that mixed seed sourcing can contribute to higher genetic diversity in revegetation. Finally, we emphasize the type of metadata needed to determine factors influencing genetic diversity in revegetation and inform restoration efforts.
6
J. Hobbs, Richard. "Can revegetation assist in the conservation of biodiversity in agricultural areas?" Pacific Conservation Biology 1, no. 1 (1994): 29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/pc930029.
It has been suggested that revegetation in agricultural areas to tackle land degradation problems can also aid in the conservation of biodiversity in these regions. Native biota is restricted to remnant areas, which are mostly small, often unconnected, and subject to a variety of impacts from the surrounding altered landscape. The current remnant network is not sufficient to ensure the long-term persistence of the biota, and requires enhancement. Revegetation provides an opportunity to protect and add to the existing remnant network. However, there are few data available with which to assess the likely impact of revegetation on conservation values, and few guidelines as to how revegetation should be designed for conservation purposes. This paper presents an initial framework for developing revegetation strategies which tie into the existing conservation network. Revegetation can either provide buffer strips around existing remnants to protect them from external impacts, corridors between them to increase connectivity, or additional habitat to increase the area of vegetation available, or can enhance degraded remnant areas. Precise design principles and specifications for these types of revegetation are lacking, and may not be appropriate since they will depend on vegetation types and the requirements of target species. In addition, revegetation will help retain biodiversity indirectly if it helps stabilize an otherwise degrading agricultural landscape. Revegetation in agricultural areas is compared with minesite rehabilitation, where the redevelopment of functioning ecosystems and faunal habitat appears to be possible. The task is harder in the agricultural situation because the scale of modification is greater, soil changes are more difficult to redress, and recolonization by native species is less likely. Increased research effort is needed on the implementation and effects of differing types of revegetation, strategies for increasing rates of adoption of revegetation and methods of integrating conservation considerations into revegetation programmes.
7
Carrera-Hernández, J. J., C. A. Mendoza, K. J. Devito, R. M. Petrone, and B. D. Smerdon. "Reclamation for aspen revegetation in the Athabasca oil sands: Understanding soil water dynamics through unsaturated flow modelling." Canadian Journal of Soil Science 92, no. 1 (January 2012): 103–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjss2010-035.
Carrera-Hernández, J. J., Mendoza, C. A., Devito, K. J., Petrone, R. M. and Smerdon, B. D. 2012. Reclamation for aspen revegetation in the Athabasca oil sands: Understanding soil water dynamics through unsaturated flow modelling. Can. J. Soil Sci. 92: 103–116. Reclamation of mined areas in the Athabasca oil sands region is required by law, with the ultimate goal of revegetating to species characteristic of predisturbance native plant communities. To develop adequate reclamation strategies, an analysis of soil water dynamics is of utmost importance, as is understanding the impact of the thickness of the reclamation cover. In this work, soil water dynamics and fluxes at the water table were simulated for three reclamation scenarios and compared with the fluxes obtained for natural conditions assuming that aspen is the target reclamation species. According to the simulations, a reclamation thickness between 0.5 and 1.0 m can be used to provide water for revegetation. The numerical simulations show that the reclaimed landscapes have fluxes at the water table that exhibit less fluctuation than natural conditions. To limit the interaction between the water table and atmospheric fluxes, and to limit upward flux, the water table should be deeper than 2.0 m on reclaimed landscapes that use aspen for revegetation, particularly when reclamation takes place during a dry climatological cycle.
8
Statton, John, Kingsley W. Dixon, Renae K. Hovey, and Gary A. Kendrick. "A comparative assessment of approaches and outcomes for seagrass revegetation in Shark Bay and Florida Bay." Marine and Freshwater Research 63, no. 11 (2012): 984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/mf12032.
Here, we review the literature to evaluate seagrass revegetation projects focussed on Posidonia australis and Amphibolis antarctica, the main affected species in Shark Bay in the World Heritage Area in Western Australia, together with projects from Florida Bay, an analogous system with a long history of seagrass revegetation. We assessed the effectiveness of anchoring planting units, plant-unit density and size on planting-unit survival. We found no positive trends in our assessment, suggesting that there is no discrete technique, approach or technology that could be used with confidence to deliver cost-effective, scalable revegetation. Of concern was that revegetation success was evaluated over comparatively short time frames (1–3 years), driven by the strict time frames or deadlines of governing grant funding and commercial activities, leading to concerns that long-term revegetation outcomes may be difficult to assess with confidence. Several factors influenced revegetation outcomes which were grouped into three ‘filter’ categories; abiotic, biotic and socioeconomic. We recommend that future revegetation programs involving seagrass have greater emphasis on understanding how these filters act independently or collectively to drive successful revegetation as well as developing cost-effective, proven and scalable technology supported by longer-term monitoring to ensure revegetation programs do achieve the desired ecological outcomes.
9
Muhaya, Rina, and Asysyifa Asysyifa. "BIAYA REVEGETASI GAMBUT BERDASARKAN KARAKTERISTIK SPESIFIK LAHAN GAMBUT." Jurnal Hutan Tropis 9, no. 2 (August 5, 2021): 454. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jht.v9i2.11297.
Peat revegetation is an effort to reduce the rate of areas reduction and the decreasing of storing capability of carbon and to restore the ecological function of peatlands. The purpose of this study was to analyze the cost components of peatland revegetation activities and to analyze the cost of each peat revegetation activity component. The research location taked place in 2 (two) villages, Haur Gading District, HSU Regency, South Kalimantan. The components of revegetation costs were grouped into: transportation costs, tools and mateials, payment and other costs. Data obtained from surveys and field observations and interviews. The data analysis used were a tabulation matrix and a comparison of each cost component for revegetation activities from the 2 compared villages. The total cost of Village A peatland revegetation activities is 10,851,018/ha. The characteristics of the community in Village A are very participatory and willing to cooperate with outside parties so that revegetation activities in this Village run well. The very high value of mutual cooperation and the desire to put common interests first became the basis for their actions. Village B revegetation activity costs Rp.12,117,883.00/ha. The very large costs involved in the procurement of seedlings due to the addition of 3,500 seedlings/21ha as replacements for dead, damaged or lost seedlings. The difference in the cost of revegetation activities is IDR 1,266,865/ha. This shows that a high level of participation and cooperation is able to reduce the cost of revegetation of peatlands.
10
Bohner, Andreas, Silvia Winter, and Franz Starlinger. "Evaluation of different revegetation measures on mudflow deposits in the Nature Park Sölktäler (Styria, Austria)." Die Bodenkultur: Journal of Land Management, Food and Environment 71, no. 3 (September 1, 2020): 169–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/boku-2020-0015.
Summary In mountain regions, the likelihood of mudflows might increase due to climate change. Although mudflows are common worldwide and devastate agricultural land, virtually nothing is known about the revegetation of mudflow deposits for agricultural purposes. To provide recommendations for rapid revegetation of mountain pastures, 52 permanent plots (4 m × 4 m) on 20 revegetated mudflow deposits in the Nature Park Sölktäler were established. We evaluated different revegetation measures (seed addition alone or combined with application of straw, lime or cattle manure) two years after sowing using commercial clover-grass seed mixtures. Furthermore, 27 permanent plots on 15 unsown mudflow deposits were surveyed. Sowing seeds can considerably accelerate revegetation on siliceous mudflow deposits. Festuca rubra, Agrostis capillaris, Lolium perenne, Trifolium repens and Lotus corniculatus are particularly suitable for rapid grassland reestablishment, whereas Poa pratensis is not recommendable. A pure straw application should be avoided because it delays the revegetation success. Lime addition is not recommended because it can lead to an undesirable legume dominance if clover-grass seed mixtures are used for revegetation. The most effective measure for large-scale revegetation seems to be seed addition without additives. To facilitate revegetation on coarse-grained deposits, large rocks should be crushed using a stone mill.
Mrena, Chuck. "The revegetation of drastically disturbed lands." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape2/PQDD_0020/MQ53199.pdf.
Bai, Shahla Hosseini. "The Impact of Site Management Practices on the Revegetation of Highly Disturbed Sites in Sub-Tropical and Tropical Queensland." Thesis, Griffith University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/366823.
Revegetation schemes are increasing in Australia and are part of strategy to restore cleared lands, enhance biodiversity and alleviate global climate change. Site preparation practices play a pivotal role in the successful establishment of revegetation projects in tropical and sub-tropical Australia. However, site preparation practices are costly and there is great interest to develop cost-effective establishment methods. The most common site preparation practices, in Australia, include weed control and fertilisation. Reduced weed competition is a crucial factor in the successful establishment of revegetation projects. Herbicide application is the most commonly used method of weed control but need for repeated site visits and sequential applications greatly increase establishment costs. Alternative methods are sought to reduce the reliance on herbicide application. One such method is scalping, the removal of the top 100 mm of soil from the planting area which effectively removes the soil seed bank. Both herbicide and scalping have implications for soil properties which could in turn affect early plant growth and establishment. This study aimed to investigate the dynamics of soil organic matter (SOM), carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) pools under differing site preparation practices and the associated effects on plant survival, growth and eco-physiological status in tropical and sub-tropical Australia.
Two experimental sites located at Rockhampton (23º31'24 S, 150º18'14 E) and Laidley (27º40'31 S, 152º24'04 E) were established in this study. The treatment layout was randomised complete block split plot. Treatments included topsoil removal (scalping) and herbicide application for weed control. Other treatments included the use of fertiliser to overcome the potentially negative effects of scalping and to give a competitive advantage to seedlings. Thesis (PhD Doctorate) Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) School of Biomolecular and Physical Sciences Science, Environment, Engineering and Technology Full Text
3
Brooks, Margaret Ann. "Evaluation of roadside revegetation in central Arizona." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186330.
The policies of the USDA Forest Service and the Arizona Department of Transportation require revegetation of land disturbed by road construction. Revegetation objectives of both agencies include soil stabilization and mitigation of visual impacts. Typical seed mixes include Lehmann and Cochise lovegrass (Eragrostis Lehmanniana), crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum), desert buckwheat (Eriogonum fasciculatum), fourwing saltbush (Atriplex canescens), and other species as appropriate. Seeding is done by drilling on slopes of 3:1 or flatter; hydroseeding is used on slopes steeper than 3:1. A mulch of blown-on straw, affixed with a vegetative tackifier, is typically applied after seeding. This study documented plant cover and density on roadside cuts and fills which were revegetated over a period of 7 years (1985-92). Plant cover and density were measured on cut and fill slopes and regressed against various independent environmental variables, including aspect, slope gradient, and soil particle size. The soil surface at each site was evaluated to assess success in soil stabilization. Success in mitigating visual impacts was evaluated by having university students rate the appearance of vegetation on each site. Results obtained in this study suggest that revegetation has been successful in meeting the stated objectives on fill sites, but not on cut sites.
4
Wong, Siu-wai. "Plant selection for revegetation projects in Hong Kong." Click to view the E-thesis via HKUTO, 1992. http://sunzi.lib.hku.hk/hkuto/record/B43893442.
Withers, Naomi. "Regional revegetation strategies : example of the Willunga Basin /." Title page, table of contents and abstract only, 1993. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09ENV/09envw824.pdf.
Wong, Siu-wai, and 黃兆偉. "Plant selection for revegetation projects in Hong Kong." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 1992. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B43893442.
Briggs, Mark K. (Mark Kendig) 1961. "An evaluation of riparian revegetation efforts in Arizona." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 1992. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/192065.
Twenty-five riparian revegetation projects and two alternative mitigations were evaluated in Arizona. Sites were visited and agency personnel were interviewed to detail riparian revegetation methodologies and categorize revegetation projects based on how well they achieved their objectives. Riparian revegetation is limited in its ability to improve degraded riparian ecosystems and is most effective when the causes of site degradation are addressed. Of the selected successful revegetation projects, 73% incorporated other forms of mitigation (e.g., improved land management strategies, bank stabilization structures, irrigation) that either indirectly or directly addressed the causes of site degradation. Over 33% of the successful revegetation projects experienced prolific natural regeneration, demonstrating the potential for natural regenerative processes to accomplish revegetation objectives. Of the unsuccessful revegetation projects, 85% did not achieve objectives due to low water availability or flooding. The appropriateness of using riparian revegetation should be determined on a site by site basis using two check-lists developed from the results of this study. The first check-list describes the potential effectiveness of artificial revegetation, the second checklist describes the potential that prolific natural regeneration will occur.
9
Lawson, Holly Marie. "Grassland Revegetation for Mine Reclamation in Southeast Arizona." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/202934.
Mine land reclamation techniques were tested in arid Southeast Arizona for their potential to enhance reclamation success on two sites at different elevations (1400- and 1650-meters above sea level) on two sandy loam soils (Arkose and Gila Conglomerate). Seedbed preparation (smooth or rough surface) and straw mulch treatments (surface mulch, mulch incorporated into the soil, or no mulch) were tested for their potential to establish vegetation and prevent erosion. Gila soil retained 12.9% more soil moisture than the Arkose soil and was preferred by the seed mix (Gila: 64.4 plants m⁻²; Arkose: 23.2 plants m⁻²). A rough surface with surface mulch was recommended. Gila soil was more susceptible to erosion likely because it contained smaller soil particles. Rock cover was associated with significantly (P=0.0138) reduced rate of soil movement (0.1588 cm soil loss or accumulation per 1 percent rock cover). Proper soil management can be critical for reclamation success.
10
Thacker, Gary W., and Jerry R. Cox. "Revegetation of Retired Farmland: Evaluation of Eight Range Grasses." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1990. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/201342.
In July of 1988, we planted eight range grass species on retired farmland in the Avra Valley west of Tucson. In November of 1989, Arabian yellow bluestem, kleingrass, buffelgrass, "Catalina" lovegrass, and bermudagrass all yielded over 1000 Kg /Ha of oven dry forage "Cochise" lovegrass yielded 889 Kg /Ha, sideoats grama grass yielded 126 Kg /Ha, and bottlebrush yielded 86 Kg /Ha.
G, Aschmann Stefanie, and Construction Engineering Research Laboratories (U.S.), eds. Revegetation strategies for Kahoòlawe Island, Hawaii. [Champaign, Ill.]: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, 1994.
Richmond, Timothy C. "The Revegetation of Metalliferous Tailings." In Agronomy Monographs, 801–18. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr41.c32.
Tata, Hesti Lestari. "Genetic Diversity in Peatland Restoration: A Case of Jelutung." In Global Environmental Studies, 185–95. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0906-3_10.
AbstractThe target of the Indonesian government was to restore at least 2 million ha of degraded peatlands by 2020. This can be achieved by applying three approaches: rewetting, revegetation, and revitalization of the community. In revegetation, the use of native tree species is recommended in the technical guidelines for peatland restoration. The interest in using native plant species for ecosystem restoration, particularly for peatland restoration, is increasing significantly. The native species may adapt well to the environment and usually correspond with the people’s preference. An important concern in revegetation is the selection of suitable genetics of the planting stocks. In peatland restoration, a seed source with high genetic diversity should be used since it maintains the genetic entity. On the other hand, low genetic diversity used for peatland restoration may result in the genetic drift of the populations. A native tree species, Dyera polyphylla (locally known as jelutung), has been widely used for peatland restoration in Indonesia. Many other species can also be developed and require further research. Several community-based seedling nurseries have been established in Sumatra and Kalimantan. The challenge is to emphasize the importance of genetic diversity to the farmers with businesses in a seedling nursery. The necessary strategy of seed sourcing in peatland restoration includes composite provenancing and admixture provenancing.
3
Roundy, Bruce A., and C. A. Call. "Revegetation of arid and semiarid rangelands." In Vegetation science applications for rangeland analysis and management, 607–35. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3085-8_24.
Singh, R. S., T. B. Singh, and B. B. Dhar. "Revegetation of a Coal Mine Overburden Dump." In Environmental Stress: Indication, Mitigation and Eco-conservation, 445–48. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9532-2_39.
Peters, Tom H. "Revegetation of the Copper Cliff Tailings Area." In Restoration and Recovery of an Industrial Region, 123–33. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-2520-1_9.
Cellan, R., A. Cox, L. Burnside, and R. Gantt. "Successful revegetation of neutralized heap leach material." In Tailings and Mine Waste 2000, 321–30. London: CRC Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003078579-42.
Brofas, G., G. Mantakas, K. Tsagari, and Ch Mermiris. "Evaluation of revegetation techniques on mining spoil slopes." In Eco-and Ground Bio-Engineering: The Use of Vegetation to Improve Slope Stability, 419–25. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5593-5_43.
Belesky, David P. "Lotus Species Used in Reclamation, Renovation, and Revegetation." In Trefoil: The Science and Technology of the Lotus, 133–43. Madison, WI, USA: Crop Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cssaspecpub28.c8.
Galatowitsch, S., R. Budelsky, and L. Yetka. "Revegetation Strategies for Northern Temperate Glacial Marshes and Meadows." In An International Perspective on Wetland Rehabilitation, 225–41. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4683-8_24.
Prewitt, Johnny, and Pratita Puradyatmika. "Overburden stockpile revegetation techniques at PT Freeport Indonesia Grasberg Mine." In Seventh International Conference on Mine Closure. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1208_43_prewitt.
Spain, Alister, and Mark Tibbett. "Coal mine tailings: development after revegetation with salttolerant tree species." In Seventh International Conference on Mine Closure. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1208_47_spain.
"Will environmental revegetation increase the threat wildfire poses to assets?" In 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2013). Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2013.a3.collins.
Lu, Ping, and Ingrid Meek. "Harnessing ecological processes in the Ranger Uranium Mine revegetation strategy." In 13th International Conference on Mine Closure. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1915_57_lu.
Christie, Glenn, Briony Horner, Annette Scanlon, Jacob Lemon, and Brad Williams. "A ground up approach to revegetation in the arid zone." In 13th International Conference on Mine Closure. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1915_59_scanlon.
Tikhmenev, Evgeny, and Pavel Evgenievich Tikhmenev. "Seed Reduplication of the Flowering Plants of the Disturbed Landscapes in the Northern of Far-East of Asia." In 3rd International Congress on Engineering and Life Science. Prensip Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.61326/icelis.2023.57.
The results of studies of anthropogenic landscapes functioning with an assessment on the processes natural self-revegetation and effectivity of reclamation in tundra, forest-tundra, larch forest complexes are summarized. The principles of accelerated restoration of the ecological and aesthetic value of disturbed landscapes at the permafrost zone are substantiated, based on the data obtained during studying the self-revegetation and reclamation processes on disturbed complexes. Development of placer and ore deposits of mineral resources is leading to deep transformation of landscape and to destruction of soil-vegetation complexes. The processes caused by mining activity are leading to variable mechanisms of degradation of soil and vegetation often having complex impact. Results of study of sustainability of soil-vegetable complexes to the impact of mancaused activity have showed the dependence from the structure of soil profile and it characteristic, from the character of genetic horizons, frozen status of the landscape elements, form of the structure, biomass and seed productivity. The rate of fertilization and fruiting regularity of perspective some species of native flora for introduction as medical, nutritive or fodder plants was also determined.
7
Younkin, W. E., and H. E. Martens. "Revegetation Trials in Western Siberia: The Growth of a Cooperative Effort." In SPE Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/27167-ms.
Yusuf, Muhammad, and Endang Arisoesilaningsih. "Exotic plant species attack revegetation plants in post-coal mining areas." In 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GLOBAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION (ICGRC 2017): Green Campus Movement for Global Conservation. Author(s), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.5012716.
Przeczek, John, and Dave Ryder. "Revegetation at the Sullivan Mine – research to closure – a case study." In Sixth International Conference on Mine Closure. Australian Centre for Geomechanics, Perth, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.36487/acg_rep/1152_113_przeczek.
Saqib Mukhtar, Mark L. McFarland, Cecilia A. Gerngross, and Franklin J. Mazac. "Efficacy of Using Dairy Manure Compost as Erosion Control and Revegetation Material." In 2004, Ottawa, Canada August 1 - 4, 2004. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.16786.
Nordstrom, Jenifer. Fiscal Year 2013 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1120818.
Nordstrom, Jenifer B. Fiscal Year 2016 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1364521.
Nordstrom, Jenifer. Fiscal Year 2014 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1177231.
Nordstrom, Jenifer. Fiscal Year 2017 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1466829.
Jenifer Nordstrom and Mike Lewis. Fiscal Year 2010 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1004256.
Michael Lewis. Fiscal Year 2009 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/969493.
Jenifer Nordstrom. Fiscal Year 2012 Revegetation Assessment. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), November 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1064060.
Anderson, D. C., and D. B. Hall. Clean Slate 1 revegetation and monitoring plan. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), July 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/671859.
McLendon, T., and E. F. Redente. Revegetation manual for the environmental restoration contractor. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/481533.
David Anderson. Clean Slate 2 Revegetation and Monitoring Plan. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/13083.
