Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Judicial Division"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Judicial Division".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Judicial Division"
Pechegina, Polina D., and Maria O. Diakonova. "Specialization of Judicial Activity in Foreign Legal Orders2." Russian Journal of Legal Studies (Moscow) 10, no. 2 (July 18, 2023): 62–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/rjls346670.
Повний текст джерелаChen, Lingling. "Judicial Differences and Countermeasures on Division of Unregistered Houses with Joint Investment by Spouse in Divorce Proceedings." Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences 3, no. 7 (July 22, 2023): 61–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v3i7.5301.
Повний текст джерелаBasysta, Iryna. "Classifying Actions in Sentencing Based on the Classifying Criterion “Repeated”: Correlation between Criminal Procedural and Criminal Law Aspects." NaUKMA Research Papers. Law 6 (February 15, 2021): 3–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2020.6.3-11.
Повний текст джерелаAblyatipova, N., and I. Yashina. "Section of Common Debt of Spouses: Selected Problems of Theory and Law Enforcement Practice." Bulletin of Science and Practice 10, no. 3 (March 15, 2024): 493–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/100/64.
Повний текст джерелаSobandi, Sobandi. "THE JUDICIAL POWER LIMITATION OF COMMERCIAL COURTS COMPETENCY IN COMMERCIAL DISPUTES." International Journal of Law Reconstruction 5, no. 2 (October 10, 2021): 292. http://dx.doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v5i2.17706.
Повний текст джерелаKononova, А. V. "Judicial Management in Civil Proceedings: Formal and Material Components." Rossijskoe pravosudie 4 (March 24, 2020): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2020.4.59-71.
Повний текст джерелаRamos Alves, Luís Henrique, and Shirley Oliveira Lima Nomura. "ATIVISMO JUDICIAL E A SEPARAÇÃO DOS PODERES NO SÉCULO XXI: EXORBITAÇÃO DA FUNÇÃO ATÍPICA DO PODER JUDICIÁRIO." Colloquium Socialis 2, Especial 2 (December 1, 2018): 175–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5747/cs.2018.v02.nesp2.s0274.
Повний текст джерелаSimeneh Kiros Assefa. "Binding Interpretation of Law in Ethiopia: Observations in Federal Supreme Court Cassation Decisions." Mizan Law Review 18, no. 1 (March 30, 2024): 1–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/mlr.v18i1.1.
Повний текст джерелаSirait, Aladin. "INDONESIAN JUSTICE LEGAL POLITICS POST AMENDMENT OF 1945 CONSTITUTION." Al-IHKAM: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Jurusan Ahwal al-Syakhshiyyah Fakultas Syariah IAIN Mataram 12, no. 1 (June 30, 2020): 37–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.20414/alihkam.v12i1.2304.
Повний текст джерелаPadfield, Nicola. "THE LEGALITY OF THE MANDATORY LIFE SENTENCE." Cambridge Law Journal 61, no. 1 (March 7, 2002): 1–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197302221509.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Judicial Division"
Magalhães, Pedro Naves. "O ativismo judicial e os reflexos no processo civil." Universidade de São Paulo, 2015. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2137/tde-15122015-143227/.
Повний текст джерелаThe Federal Constitutional of 1988 introduces at the legal system a series of fundamental rights and guarantees. Among them, its significant the division of powers, which distributed in the Constitution the role of each state entity, above all, for this study, the judiciary function. Thus, it can be said that both the rules promulgated in the period after 1988 as those received by the new system, have been analyzed through the principles spectrum prism. The procedural rules coordinate the application of law to the cases and the creation of law for abstract case. However, it is necessary to mitigate any regular applicability with the principles orientation. This research tries are the collision between the procedural principles of effectiveness and instrumentality in the face of due process of law. As premised the route of due process should serve as a tool to the final decision and consequent social peace. Otherwise, it would be unnecessary the entire legal apparatus available to the public. Lastly, this study proposes an analysis about the performance of the Judge-State regarding the judicial activism. Looking to a larger goal, the need for enforcement of fundamental and social rights, the judicial activism phenomenon sometimes forgotten, sometimes exacerbated, shown itself as a necessary tool in the context highlighted.
Santos, Paulo Junior Trindade dos. "O ativismo judicial (?) e a criação do direito pela via da interpretação: as (possíveis) contribuições da filosofia no direito." Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, 2013. http://www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/4098.
Повний текст джерелаMade available in DSpace on 2015-06-30T13:22:03Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paulo Junior Trindade dos Santos.pdf: 3502323 bytes, checksum: 30604802d8651d8265f61cf37e1103fa (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-12-05
Nenhuma
Tem-se como tema o Ativismo Judicial e a criação do Direito pela via Interpretativa. O problema que se demonstra reflete quanto o Poder Judiciário é legitimado para a criação de direito, uma vez que a produção de direito somente era cabível ao Poder Legislativo. Assim, avaliar-se-á a Estrutura e as Funções do Estado para que assim se justifique a atividade de criação judicial do Direito (sempre se atentando ao binômio inércia-ativismo). Neste sentido, é de crucial importância apresentar a transformação do Estado Liberal de Direito ao Estado Democrático de Direito, pois somente com a organização dos poderes do Estado Moderno é que se pode falar evidentemente em Ativismo Judicial. Na inércia dos demais Poderes, o Poder Judiciário apresentou presença ativa para com a sociedade e para com a construção e reconfiguração do aparelho Estatal. No primeiro capítulo será evidenciada a construção do Estado de Direito e seus pressupostos; no segundo capítulo, demonstrar-se-á, a rígida técnica da separação dos poderes que se instituiu no Estado Liberal e Social de Direito, e em um segundo momento apresentar-se-á a divisão dos poderes formada com o objetivo do poder de revisão dos órgãos judiciais sob os atos dos demais Poderes. Feito isso, segue-se com o que se refere ao fortalecimento da Jurisdição Constitucional, em que em um primeiro momento mostrar-se-á sua evolução, e em um segundo momento avaliar-se-á sua contemporaneidade frente ao Estado Democrático de Direito. E por fim, apresentar-se-á a defesa da sua Legitimação Democrática, esta sempre tão questionada. Na terceira e última parte, apresentar-se-ão os conceitos e fundamentos do Ativismo Judicial, haja vista, ser um termo que se apresenta indefinido e encontra diversas conceituações. O Ativismo Judicial ganha configuração de duas correntes distintas, quais sejam, a procedimentalista e a substancialista. Deste modo, defender-se-á o Ativismo Judicial Substancialista pela via da interpretação criadora do Direito, para que não se tenha uma interpretação autêntica do Direito. Para tanto, buscar-se-á demonstrar que, com uma Filosofia do Direito, com o auxílio da Hermenêutica Jurídica, é possível fazer a construção criativa do Direito por meio do Ativismo Judicial de forma mais adequada para com a criação do Direito. A fusão de dois horizontes, a Hermenêutica Jurídica e criação do Direito, pela via Judicial, ocorre na seguinte premissa: interpretar é aplicar, e aplicar é criar direito e, assim, justifica-se o presente trabalho.
The theme is the creation of Judicial Activism and the Law: through the Interpretative route. The problem that reflects demonstrates how the judiciary is legitimized for the creation of law, since the production of the law was only applicable to the legislative branch. Thus, the Structure and Functions of the State will be evaluated, so that appropriate activity for judicial creation of law (always paying attention to the binomial inertia-activism). In this sense, it is crucial to present the transformation of Liberal State of law to the Democratic State of Law, because only with the organization of the powers of the modern state we can speak clearly to Judicial Activism. On the inertia of the other branches, the judiciary had an active presence to society and to the construction and reconfiguration of the State apparatus.In the first chapter will be evidenced building of the State of Law and its assumptions, in the second chapter, will prove that the rigid technique of separation of powers was instituted in Liberal and Social State of Law, and in a second stage to present it will be the division of powers formed with the purpose of the power of judicial organs review under the actions of other branches. That done, it follows with regard to the strengthening of Constitutional Jurisdiction, in which at first it will prove its evolution, and in a second phase will be evaluated its contemporaryatic agaisnt Democratic State of Law. Finally, the defense of Democratic Legitimacy will present itself, always questioned. In the third and final section it will present the concepts and fundamentals of Judicial Activism, considering, be a term that is undefined and has found various conceptualizations. The Judicial Activism wins configuration of two distinct streams, namely, the proceduralist and substantialist. Thus, the Judicial Activism substantialist will defend itself, by means of creative interpretation of the law, so they do not have an authentic interpretation of the law. To do so, will seek to demonstrate that, with a philosophy of law, with the assistance of Legal Hermeneutics, you can make the creative construction of the Law through Judicial Activism most appropriate way for the creation of law. The fusion of two horizons, Legal Hermeneutics and creation of law, via Judicial, occurs in the following premise: to interpret is to apply, and apply it to create law and thus is justified in this paper
Valverde, Arcos Adolfo Gregorio. "Las detenciones arbitrarias por mandato judicial en la sede de la División de Requisitorias de la Policía Nacional del Perú, durante el período 2010 al 2014 : análisis crítico desde las políticas públicas." Master's thesis, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, 2016. http://tesis.pucp.edu.pe/repositorio/handle/123456789/8046.
Повний текст джерелаTesis
Gomes, Ramonilson Alves. "Serviço judiciário e competência eficiente : adequada divisão e competência como mecanismo à eficiência." Universidade Católica de Pernambuco, 2010. http://www.unicap.br/tede//tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=518.
Повний текст джерелаSzilagyi, Elizabeth, and Sandra Salloum. "Normprövning i Uruguay och Sverige - En konstitutionell rättssäkerhet för den enskilde? : En studie av den konkreta efterhandskontrollen i ett komparativrättsligt perspektiv." Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-29638.
Повний текст джерелаHavel, Ladislav. "Oslabení nezávislosti soudnictví a vliv státní správy na soudní rozhodování v letech 1948 - 1953." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2013. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-197617.
Повний текст джерелаKardimis, Théofanis. "La chambre criminelle de la Cour de cassation face à l’article 6 de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme : étude juridictionnelle comparée (France-Grèce)." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3004.
Повний текст джерелаThe first party of the study is dedicated to the invocation of the right to a fair trial intra and extra muros and, on this basis, it focuses on the direct applicability of Article 6 and the subsidiarity of the Convention and of the European Court of Human Rights. Because of the fact that the right to a fair trial is a ‘‘judge-made law’’, the study also focuses on the invocability of the judgments of the European Court and more precisely on the direct invocability of the European Court’s judgment finding that there has been a violation of the Convention and on the request for an interpretation in accordance with the European Court’s decisions. The possibility of reviewing the criminal judgment made in violation of the Convention has generated a new right of access to the Court of cassation which particularly concerns the violations of the right to a fair trial and is probably the most important step for the respect of the right to a fair trial after enabling the right of individual petition. As for the weak conventional basis of the authority of res interpretata (“autorité de la chose interprétée”), this fact explains why an indirect dialogue between the ECHR and the Court of cassation is possible but doesn’t affect the applicant’s right to request an interpretation in accordance with the Court’s decisions and the duty of the Court of cassation to explain why it has decided to depart from the (non-binding) precedent.The second party of the study is bigger than the first one and is dedicated to the guarantees of the proper administration of justice (Article 6§1), the presumption of innocence (Article 6§2), the rights which find their conventional basis on the Article 6§1 but their logical explanation to the presumption of innocence and the rights of defence (Article 6§3). More precisely, the second party of the study is analyzing the right to an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the right to a hearing within a reasonable time, the principle of equality of arms, the right to adversarial proceedings, the right of the defence to the last word, the right to a public hearing and a public pronouncement of the judgement, the judge’s duty to state the reasons for his decision, the presumption of innocence, in both its procedural and personal dimensions, the accused’s right to lie, his right to remain silent, his right against self-incrimination, his right to be informed of the nature and the cause of the accusation and the potential re-characterisation of the facts, his right to have adequate time and facilities for the preparation of the defence, including in particular the access to the case-file and the free and confidential communication with his lawyer, his right to appear in person at the trial, his right to defend either in person or through legal assistance, his right to be represented by his counsel, his right to free legal aid if he hasn’t sufficient means to pay for legal assistance but the interests of justice so require, his right to examine or have examined witnesses against him and to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him and his right to the free assistance of an interpreter and to the translation of the key documents. The analysis is based on the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and focuses on the position taken by the French and the Greek Court of Cassation (Areopagus) on each one of the above mentioned rights
Quansah, E. K. "Determining matrimonial property rights on divorce : an appraisal of the legal regimes in Botswana." Thesis, 2001. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/15840.
Повний текст джерелаPrivate Law
LL.D.
Li, Quan. "To prosecute or not to prosecute, that is the question: the Federal Trade Commission and Antitrust Division's antitrust enforcement dilemma under judicial uncertainty." 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-1025.
Повний текст джерелаHořeňovský, Jan. "Proměna role soudní moci v 20. a 21. století. Kritická analýza role soudců jako politických a společenských aktérů v liberálních demokraciích." Master's thesis, 2019. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-396831.
Повний текст джерелаКниги з теми "Judicial Division"
American Bar Association. Judicial Division. Judicial Division record. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, Judicial Division, 1998.
Знайти повний текст джерелаVallejo, Antonio R. Division municipal y judicial de la República de Honduras. Tegucigalpa: [s.l.], 1989.
Знайти повний текст джерелаHaynie, Stacia L. Judging in black & white: Decision making in the South African Appellate Division, 1950-1990. New York: P. Lang, 2003.
Знайти повний текст джерелаThomas, Douglas W. 5th Judicial Circuit of Missouri, Juvenile Division on-site technical assistance report. Pittsburgh, PA (710 Fifth Ave., 3rd Floor, Pittsburgh 15219-3000): National Center for Juvenile Justice, 2002.
Знайти повний текст джерелаGoals, American Bar Association Judicial Administration Division Committee on Oversight and. Report of the Committee on Oversight and Goals, Judicial Administration Division, American Bar Association. Chicago: The Division, 1994.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMontana. Legislature. Legislative Audit Division. Juvenile delinquency intervention program, Youth Services Division, Department of Corrections, Judicial Branch: Performance audit. Helena, MT: Legislative Audit Division, State of Montana., 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаConnecticut. Commission to Study the Management of State Government., ed. Reduce state expenditures and improve the efficiency of the Judicial Department, the Division of Public Defender Services, the Division of Criminal Justice, and the county sheriffs: Final report. [Hartford, Conn.]: State of Connecticut, Commission to Study the Management of State Government, 1991.
Знайти повний текст джерелаNew Hampshire. Office of the Legislative Budget Assistant. State of New Hampshire Judicial Branch Family Division Pilot Program: Performance audit report, January 2000. Concord, N.H. (107 North Main St., Rm. 102, Concord 03301-4906): The Office, 2000.
Знайти повний текст джерелаAccounts, Connecticut Auditors of Public. Performance audit report, child support. Hartford, Conn: Auditors of Public Accounts, 1996.
Знайти повний текст джерелаNew York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division. First Dept. Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Department, 1896-1996. New York: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Judicial Dept., 1996.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Judicial Division"
Đuković, Mirko. "Backsliding Rule of Law and “Stabilitocracy” in Montenegro." In Polarization, Shifting Borders and Liquid Governance, 213–28. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44584-2_12.
Повний текст джерелаTochtermann, Peter. "Judicial vacations." In Unified Patent Protection in Europe: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0161.
Повний текст джерелаGillespie, Alisdair, and Siobhan Weare. "8. Staffing and Appointments to the Courts and Tribunals." In The English Legal System. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785439.003.0008.
Повний текст джерелаPattenden, Rosemary. "Correcting Erroneous Exercises of Discretion." In Judicial Discretion and Criminal Litigation, 374–404. Oxford University PressOxford, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198255673.003.0010.
Повний текст джерелаCha, Dongwook. "Judicial Politics." In The Oxford Handbook of South Korean Politics. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192894045.013.13.
Повний текст джерелаGillespie, Alisdair A., and Siobhan Weare. "8. The Judiciary and their Appointment." In The English Legal System, 243–97. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198830900.003.0008.
Повний текст джерелаGillespie, Alisdair A., and Siobhan Weare. "8. The Judiciary and their Appointment." In The English Legal System, 243–99. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198868996.003.0008.
Повний текст джерелаGillespie, Alisdair, and Siobhan Weare. "8. The Judiciary and their Appointment." In The English Legal System, 245–301. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198889632.003.0008.
Повний текст джерелаGillespie, Alisdair A., and Siobhan Weare. "6. The Structure of the Courts." In The English Legal System, 201–24. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198830900.003.0006.
Повний текст джерелаGillespie, Alisdair, and Siobhan Weare. "6. The Structure of the Courts." In The English Legal System. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785439.003.0006.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Judicial Division"
Karaman, Ebru. "Structure of the Constitutional Courts in Comparative Law: Macedonia, Turkey, Germany, Austria, France, Italy and Spain." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c05.01158.
Повний текст джерелаRapajić, Milan. "UPRAVNOPRAVNI ASPEKTI ZAŠTITE PRAVA POTROŠAČA U SRPSKOM PRAVU." In XIX majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xixmajsko.759r.
Повний текст джерелаVujisic, Dragan. "VLADAVINA PRAVA I USLUGE." In XVII majsko savetovanje. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Kragujvcu, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/uvp21.003v.
Повний текст джерела