Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Jamet (Pierre)"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Jamet (Pierre)".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Jamet (Pierre)":
1
Mathieu, Anne. "La Gazette Dunlop et les loisirs. Sur Emmanuel Berl, Pierre Jamet, Jacques Kayser, Jean Moral, Pierre Scize, Simone Téry et quelques autres." Aden N° 19, no. 1 (February 16, 2023): 43–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/aden.019.0043.
2
Trochu, T. "L’Amérique de Pierre Janet : William James & Co." Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique 166, no. 3 (April 2008): 199–205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amp.2008.01.002.
3
Jatuff, Jose, and Claudio Viale. "A ação nos limites da consciência." Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia 24, no. 1 (April 29, 2023): e60898. http://dx.doi.org/10.23925/2316-5278.2023v24i1:e60898.
Анотація:
James procurou superar a cisão da personalidade por meio de uma antropologia da ação em que combinou vários materiais intelectuais que não respeitam fronteiras epistemológicas. Apropriou-se estrategicamente de diferentes fontes culturais e avanços da psicopatologia para pensar a liberação das possibilidades da consciência e da experiência. Entre eles, serão exploradas suas leituras de Giovanni Papini e Pierre Janet para dar conta do modo preciso como essas contribuições intelectuais atuam em sua antropologia da superação.
4
Brown, Paul. "Pierre Janet." Current Opinion in Psychiatry 4, no. 3 (June 1991): 389–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001504-199106000-00006.
5
Heim, Gerhard. "Pierre Janet." PiD - Psychotherapie im Dialog 18, no. 03 (September 2017): 34–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-111285.
6
Boulangée, Tom. "Centre Pierre Janet." Hegel N°3, no. 3 (2020): 250. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/heg.103.0250.
7
Sommer, Andreas. "Professional Heresy: Edmund Gurney (1847–88) and the Study of Hallucinations and Hypnotism." Medical History 55, no. 3 (July 2011): 383–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0025727300005445.
Анотація:
The English music theorist and philosophical writer Edmund Gurney was the first ‘fulltime’ psychical researcher in history. While he was primarily concerned with empirical evidence for telepathy, Gurney significantly contributed to the late nineteenth-century literature on hallucinations in the sane, and the psychology of hypnotism and dissociation. He conducted the first large-scale survey of hallucinations in the general public and, with Pierre Janet, was the first to publish experimental data suggesting dissociated streams of consciousness in hypnotism. This paper sketches Gurney's contributions to psychology and dynamic psychiatry in the context of his friendship with Frederic W.H. Myers and William James. It is argued that although Gurney's research into hallucinations and hypnotism had been embraced and assimilated by contemporary psychologists such as William James, Alfred Binet and others, his contributions to psychology have subsequently been marginalised because of the discipline's paradigmatic rejection of controversial research questions his findings were entangled with.
8
Heim, G. "Pierre Janet (1859-1947)." Der Nervenarzt 70, no. 11 (November 5, 1999): 1019–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001150050532.
9
Heim, Gerhard, and Karl-Ernst Bühler. "Pierre Janet (1859-1947)." Psychosomatik und Konsiliarpsychiatrie 2, no. 4 (November 2008): 186–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11800-008-0124-2.
10
Alvarado, Carlos S. "Dissociation and the Unconscious Mind: Nineteenth-Century Perspectives on Mediumship." Journal of Scientific Exploration 34, no. 3 (September 15, 2020): 537–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.31275/20201735.
Анотація:
There is a long history of discussions of mediumship as related to dissociation and the unconscious mind during the Nineteenth Century. After an overview of relevant ideas and observations from the mesmeric, hypnosis, and spiritualistic literatures, I focus on the writings of Jules Baillarger, Alfred Binet, Paul Blocq, Théodore Flournoy, Jules Héricourt, William James, Pierre Janet, Ambroise August Liébeault, Frederic W.H. Myers, Julian Ochorowicz, Charles Richet, Hippolyte Taine, Paul Tascher, and Edouard von Hartmann. While some of their ideas reduced mediumship solely to intra-psychic processes, others considered as well veridical phenomena. The speculations of these individuals, involving personation, and different memory states, were part of a general interest in the unconscious mind, and in automatisms, hysteria, and hypnosis during the period in question. Similar ideas continued into the Twentieth Century.
Дисертації з теми "Jamet (Pierre)":
1
Lotiron, Claire. "Le Quintette Instrumental de Paris et la pratique chambriste en France dans l'entre-deux guerres : carrière et répertoire (flûte, harpe et trio à cordes)." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne université, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024SORUL020.
Анотація:
En 1922, le flûtiste René Le Roy eut l'idée de créer une formation chambriste dont l'effectif instrumental atypique (flûte, harpe et trio à cordes) n'est pas sans rappeler celui de la Sonate pour flûte alto et harpe de Debussy qu'il affectionnait particulièrement. Le Quintette Instrumental de Paris poursuit une intense carrière musicale jusqu'en 1940, grâce à l'investissement et à la rigueur de ses membres originels : Marcel Grandjany puis Pierre Jamet à la harpe, René Bas au violon, Pierre Grout à l'alto et Roger Boulmé au violoncelle. Le groupe est dissous durant la guerre, à la suite du départ de René Le Roy pour l'Amérique et de la mort au combat de Roger Boulmé. Le Quintette se reforme en 1944, sous l'impulsion de son harpiste dont il portera le nom. À la séparation définitive de l'ensemble en 1958, le Quintette Pierre Jamet trouve un nouvel élan en la personne de Marie-Claire Jamet, fille de Pierre Jamet, et de son mari le flûtiste Christian Lardé. Cette thèse, qui se concentre sur la première période d'activité de l'ensemble (1922-1940), se propose d'examiner la manière dont le groupement est parvenu à s'implanter et pérenniser son activité, alors même qu'il ne correspondait à aucune tradition chambriste et qu'il ne disposait d'aucun répertoire préexistant. Les interprètes sollicitèrent les compositeurs de leur temps afin d'enrichir progressivement leur répertoire. À la lumière de documents d'archives pas ou peu exploités jusqu'à maintenant, la première partie du travail s'attache à reconstituer la trajectoire musicale de l'ensemble et à mesurer la place qu'il occupe dans la vie musicale de son époque. Il jouit d'un contexte historique favorable à la pratique de la musique de chambre et suscite l'intérêt des compositeurs, séduits par le potentiel expressif de cette nouvelle combinaison instrumentale. Une deuxième partie revient sur les stratégies de carrière mises en place par l'ensemble lui-même pour promouvoir son activité en France comme à l'étranger. L'occasion nous est donnée de revenir sur la figure de l'imprésario qui, à l'instar de Marcel de Valmalète, exerce une influence de plus en plus grandissante dans la vie musicale française. Dans une période de grands bouleversements géopolitiques, l'Association Française d'Action Artistique (A.F.A.A.), qui œuvre pour la promotion de la musique française à l'étranger, favorise grandement le déploiement de la carrière du Quintette en Europe et en Amérique. À ce titre, les deux tournées américaines réalisées en 1934 et 1935 s'érigent comme un modèle de rayonnement artistique. Proche de René Le Roy et surtout de Pierre Jamet, Nadia Boulanger facilite l'introduction du Quintette dans le milieu musical new-yorkais, en endossant un rôle d'intercesseur. La programmation de concerts, également reconstituée, repose sur le principe d'alternance de pièces d'effectifs différents, tout en s'attachant à remettre à l'honneur des pages méconnues du répertoire baroque et présenter les dernières productions de compositeurs contemporains. Afin d'en mesurer les spécificités, le répertoire interprétatif du Quintette est mis en regard d'autres formations de la même époque, en particulier le Trio Cortot-Thibaud-Casals, le Trio Pasquier et le Quatuor Calvet, qui bénéficiaient également d'une grande visibilité sur les mêmes années d'exercice. Enfin, la troisième partie aborde spécifiquement l'esthétique du répertoire en quintette progressivement constitué entre 1923 et 1938, et qui comprend près d'une trentaine d'œuvres composées à l'intention du Quintette Instrumental de Paris. Un corpus plus resserré comprenant les dix quintettes les plus représentatifs de leur répertoire (Jongen, Roussel, d'Indy, Pierné, Cras, Ropartz, Schmitt, Malipiero et Françaix) font l'objet d'une analyse approfondie de l'écriture et de la gestion de l'effectif instrumental. Ce travail permet d'aborder les questions d'homogénéité sonore, d'explorations timbriques et de configuration instrumentaleIn 1922, the flutist René Le Roy had the idea of creating a chamber ensemble with an atypical combination of instruments (flute, harp and string trio) which recalls Debussy's Sonate pour flute, alto et harpe that he was particularly fond of. The Quintette Instrumental de Paris had a well-filled musical career until 1940, thanks to the dedication and rigour of its founder members: Marcel Grandjany, and then Pierre Jamet on the harp, René Bas on the violin, Pierre Grout on the viola and Roger Boulmé on the cello. The ensemble was disbanded during the war, when René le Roy left for America, and Roger Boulmé was killed in action. In 1944, the harpist Pierre Jamet re- formed the quintet, which now bears his name. When the group finally split up in 1958, the Pierre Jamet Quintet was given a new lease of life by Marie-Claire Jamet, Pierre Jamet's daughter, and her husband, the flutist Christian Lardé. This thesis, which focusses on the ensemble's first period of activity (1922-1940), sets out to examine how the group managed to get established and sustain its activity, even though it did not belong to any chamber music tradition and had no pre-existing repertoire. The players turned to contemporary composers in order to gradually enrich their repertoire. The first part sets out to reconstruct the musical trajectory of the ensemble, in the light of documentary evidence scarcely used until now., and to assess its place in the musical life of its time. The ensemble benefited from a favourable historical context for the practice of chamber music, and it attracted composers who were interested in the expressive potential of this new combination of instruments. The second part looks at the career strategies implemented by the ensemble itself to promote its activities in France and abroad. This provides an opportunity to reconsider the figure of the impresario who, like Marcel de Valmalète, exerted an ever-growing influence on French musical life. In this period of great geopolitical upheaval, the Association Française d'Action Artistique (A.F.A.A.), which promoted French music abroad, greatly encouraged the Quintet's career in Europe and America. This is perfectly illustrated by the two American tours in 1934 and 1935. Nadia Boulanger, who was close to René Le Roy and more particularly to Pierre Jamet, acted as an intermediary to facilitate the Quintet's introduction into the New York musical milieu. The concert programme, which had also been restructured, was based on the principle of alternating pieces for different sized groups, endeavouring to give pride of place to little-known pages from the Baroque repertoire and to present the latest works by contemporary composers.In order to assess the particular nature of the Quintet's interpretative repertoire, it is compared with that of other groups from the same period, in particular the Trio Cortot-Thibaud-Casals, the Trio Pasquier and the Quatuor Calvet, which were also popular at the time. Finally, the third part deals specifically with the aesthetics of the quintet as it progressed between 1923 and 1938, including some thirty works composed for the Quintette Instrumental de Paris. A more restricted corpus comprising the ten quintets which best exemplify their repertoire (Jongen, Roussel, d'Indy, Pierné, Cras, Ropartz, Schmitt, Malipiero and Françaix) is the focus of an in-depth analysis of the writing and management of this particular combination of instruments. We can hereby tackle the questions of sound homogeneity, exploration of timbre and instrumental configuration
2
Blaser, Juliana Gonçalves. "Multiplicando a consciência: a dissociação e suas consequências segundo Pierre Janet." Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, 2015. https://repositorio.ufjf.br/jspui/handle/ufjf/350.
Анотація:
Submitted by Renata Lopes (renatasil82@gmail.com) on 2016-01-07T13:16:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
julianagoncalvesblaser.pdf: 1145879 bytes, checksum: a8431f26237035be63ba806e0f977f3a (MD5)Approved for entry into archive by Adriana Oliveira (adriana.oliveira@ufjf.edu.br) on 2016-01-25T16:44:33Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 julianagoncalvesblaser.pdf: 1145879 bytes, checksum: a8431f26237035be63ba806e0f977f3a (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-01-25T16:44:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 julianagoncalvesblaser.pdf: 1145879 bytes, checksum: a8431f26237035be63ba806e0f977f3a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-02-09
A Psicologia francesa do final do século XIX, recentemente separada da Filosofia, utilizava como um de seus principais métodos o estudo dos estados alterados de consciência e das doenças mentais no intuito de compreender melhor o funcionamento normal da mente humana. Dentre os pioneiros desta Psicologia, destacou-se Pierre Janet. Seu estudo sobre as alterações mentais, principalmente o hipnotismo e a histeria, deram origem às suas concepções sobre força e fraqueza psicológica, dissociação e atividade subconsciente, ideias estas que abriram margem para um novo entendimento da atividade mental fora da consciência, contribuíram para o desenvolvimento da psiquiatria dinâmica e, principalmente, apresentaram à sua época um caráter conciliador entre as novas tendências da psicologia e a antiga psicologia. Contudo, embora tenha sido um autor relevante, seus trabalhos são pouco conhecidos na atualidade e, em língua portuguesa, a bibliografia sobre ele é escassa. Nosso objetivo foi, portanto: (i) analisar o surgimento do conceito de dissociação na obra inicial de Pierre Janet, assim como as suas principais acepções; (ii) apresentar como Janet chegou à formulação deste conceito e como esse se desenvolveu ao longo de sua obra; (iii) explicar o mecanismo da dissociação segundo o autor; (iv) esclarecer o que ocorre com os elementos dissociados da consciência; (v) apresentar a relação da dissociação com outros conceitos fundamentais da obra de Janet, tais como vontade, fraqueza de síntese e automatismo e; (vi) expor as explicações de Janet para a histeria, hipnotismo e duplas personalidades com base na sua teoria da dissociação. Para tanto, realizamos uma leitura analítica da segunda fase de suas obras, que vai desde 1885 a 1894 (contendo 3 livros e 17 artigos), na qual este autor se dedicou a estudar profundamente este tema, buscando estabelecer a definição dos principais conceitos desta fase de suas obras, com ênfase na dissociação, e também as relações existentes entre eles. Como resultados obtivemos que conceito dissociação apareceu pela primeira vez nas obras de Janet em 1887 no artigo L'anesthésie systématisée et la dissociation des phénomènes psychologiques. Nele Janet coloca que a dissociação ocorre quando um item, seja uma memória, uma sensação ou um movimento, não se liga à ideia de eu do sujeito, sendo, portanto, removido da consciência normal. Porém, a partir de 1889, da obra L’automatisme psychologique, não vemos mais aparecer o termo dissociação, mas sim um novo termo, o termo desagregação (désagrégation), o qual acreditamos ser, contudo, seu sinônimo. O mecanismo da dissociação é apresentado por Janet, principalmente, quando ele explica a formação dos sintomas histéricos. Para ele estes sintomas histéricos, ou seja, as anestesias, as abulias, as amnésias e os problemas do movimento são todos causados por uma fraqueza de síntese psicológica que leva, por sua vez à desagregação psicológica. Nestes quadros, devido à fraqueza de síntese, certos grupos de sensações, memórias, emoções ou informações sobre o ambiente deixam de ser sintetizados à ideia de eu (fator fundamental, segundo Janet, para que um fenômeno possa fazer parte da consciência) e, portanto, permanecem dissociados da consciência normal, gerando, respectivamente: as anestesias, as amnésias, as modificações do caráter e as abulias. Estes elementos não sintetizados continuam, contudo, a existir podendo “ficar isolados e desaparecer ou podem se associar com outros fatos igualmente separados de toda a consciência e formar uma segunda personalidade” (Janet, 1887 p.402). A ação destes cada um deles sobre a consciência da histérica, por sua vez, é a raiz do que Janet chamou de acidentes histéricos dentre os quais estão incluídos as contraturas, a catalepsia parcial, o sonambulismo, os ataques, alguns delírios e os atos subconscientes. É possível concluir que a dissociação é de fundamental importância para a compreensão da histeria sob o ponto de vista de Janet e que é também um conceito chave da fase inicial de suas obras.
The French psychologists of the XIX century used, as one of its main methods, the exploration of the altered states of consciousness and mental illness to achieve a better understanding of the normal human mind. Among this French psychologists, Pierre Janet is a central figure. His studies on hysteria and hypnotism gave birth to his conceptions about psychological weakness, dissociation and unconscious activity. His theories held to a new understanding of mental activity occurring outside of conscious awareness, contributed to the development of the dynamic psychiatry and, specially, seemed to conciliate the two divided trends of the XIX century French psychology (the medical and the philosophical one). Even though Pierre Janet be an important French psychologist, in Brazil, there is a lack of studies about him. Because of it, our aim was to: (i) find out when Janet started to use the concept “dissociation”, its definition, and its changes; (ii) show how did Janet conclude about the existence of dissociation of consciousness, (iii) point out the relationship between the dissociation and the mental weakness, (iv) explain the mechanism of dissociation according to Janet, (v) describe what happens to the elements dissociated to normal consciousness and (vi) show the role of dissociation on hysteria, hypnotism and double personality according him. To achieve our goal we analyzed Pierre Janet’s works between 1885 and 1894 (3 books and 17 articles). As a result we noticed that the concept dissociation appeared for the first time in the article of 1887 L'anesthésie systématisée et la dissociation des phénomènes psychologiques. In this article, Janet explains that dissociation happens when an element, a memory or a sensation, is not synthesized to self, being, consequently, removed to the normal consciousness. However, from 1889 and beyond Janet substituted the term dissociation for another one, desegregation, keeping for both the same meaning. The mechanism of dissociation is described by Janet while he is explaining the hysterical symptoms. According to him, its symptoms (anesthesia, amnesia and movement disturbances) are due to a problem to synthesize sensations, memories and information about the environment (respectively) to self. This elements which were not synthesized can continue existing outside the normal consciousness, isolated or grouped, in a more or less complex system, being able to originate a secondary personality. These elements can affect the hysterical psychism giving birth to the hysterical accidents as contractures, the hysterical crises, the delirium, the catalepsies, the somnambulism and the unconscious acts. To sum up, it is possible to conclude that dissociation in a fundamental concept of the initial works of Pierre Janet and it is an essential concept to understand his views of hypnotism, hysteria and double personality.
3
Beyer, Elisabeth. "Esquisse d'une histoire de la mémoire implicite centrée sur Pierre Janet." Université Louis Pasteur (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 1991. http://www.theses.fr/1991STR1M057.
4
Amarilli, Philippe. "La dissociation selon Janet : vers un inconscient "à la française"." Université Louis Pasteur (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 1991. http://www.theses.fr/1991STR1M181.
5
BOUVIER, BOURRAIN MIREILLE. "La plume et la pierre : architecture et création romanesque chez Henry James." Chambéry, 1997. http://www.theses.fr/1997CHAML005.
Анотація:
Décor de l'oeuvre de fiction et métaphore du projet littéraire, l'architecture constitue l'un des thèmes majeurs des romans de James. Son importance est liée à l'intérêt de l'auteur pour les arts plastiques et au respect d'une tradition qui, par le biais de l'analogie, a depuis longtemps rapproché l'art des mots de celui de la pierre. Cette étude se propose de dégager les fondements d'une telle attirance pour l'esthétique architecturale et d'en apprécier l'application dans le roman, ces deux aspects soulignant, à leur tour, le caractère "spatial" de l'écriture jamesienne. En l'absence d'essais spécifiques consacrés à l'architecture, l'étude débute par l'analyse des carnets de voyage de James et son autobiographie. Dans ces textes s'exprime une sincère admiration pour l'ouvrage architectural, par le biais de multiples "impressions" dont le souvenir se retrouvera à la base même de la création littéraire. Une réflexion phénoménologique inspirée des travaux de Norberg-Schulz et de Heidegger permet de rattacher ce sentiment à un profond besoin de détermination spatiale. Or l'espace devient porteur de sens grâce à l'architecture qui en fait un phénomène concret, un "lieu" dans lequel l'homme trouve ses marques et y établit sa "demeure". L'architecture assume ce rôle dans l'espace physique mais aussi textuel comme le montre l'étude de "The other House". Erigée en modèle de l'entreprise littéraire dans les préfaces de l'édition new-yorkaise, l'architecture permet aussi de formuler un projet ambitieux mettant en exergue la supériorité de l'artiste et le rôle du lecteur dans la création du texte. Cependant, à l'instar de l'écriture qu'elles se proposent d'illustrer, les métaphores du discours critique présentent des ambigüités et des paradoxes. Aussi l'architecture littéraire jamessienne se pare-t-elle parfois d'un trompe-l'oeil qui, pour autant, ne remet pas en cause la qualité "monumentale" d'oeuvres telles que "The Portrait of a Lady" ou bien "The Wings of the Dove"Used as a setting in the work of fiction and a metaphor for creative writing, architecture is a major theme in Henry James's novels. Its importance stems from the writer's interest in the visual arts and from an analogical tradition which has for a long time established connections between the art of writing and that of building. This essay aims at examining the foundations of such fondness for architectural aesthetics and assessing its application in the novel, both of these aspects highlighting, in turn, the "spatiality" of James's writing. As no specific essay was ever written by James on architecture, the study starts with an analysis of his travel essays and autobiography. In these texts the author expresses a profound admiration for architectural achievements, through numerous "impressions" whose later remembrance lies at the very core of his literary creation. A phenomenological reading based on works by Norberg-Schulz and Heidegger enables to link that feeling to a deep-rooted need for spatial determination. Now space becomes meaningful thanks to architecture which converts it into a concrete phenomenon, that is to say a "place" where man can orientate himself and "dwell". Architecture plays such a role in physical but also textual space as is shown in the analysis of the other house. Presented as an art analogue for literature in the prefaces to the New York edition, architecture also helps shape an ambitious project which asserts the superiority of the artist and the role of the reader in the creation of the text. Yet, like the writing they purport to illustrate, the metaphors in the critical discourse are ambiguous and paradoxical. Indeed, James's literary architecture sometimes resorts to a trompe-l'oeil technique that nevertheless does not challenge the "monumentality" of works such as the Portrait of a Lady or the Wings of the Dove
6
Wipf, Nicolas. "Pierre Duhem (1861 – 1916) et la théorie du magnétisme fondée sur la thermodynamique." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Lille 1, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LIL10030.
Анотація:
L’objet de ce travail est l’analyse des travaux théoriques de Pierre Duhem dans le domaine du magnétisme et de l’électromagnétisme, très peu étudiés jusqu’ici et souvent éclipsés par ses contributions à la philosophie et à l’histoire des sciences. Ces travaux correspondent toutefois à une production scientifique abondante (plus de 3500 pages), s’étalant sur toute sa carrière. Mon travail permet de mettre en évidence la richesse de son œuvre en sciences physiques, ainsi que les tâtonnements accompagnant l’élaboration de sa thermodynamique générale, un programme ambitieux et original dans le contexte scientifique de l’époque. De sa thèse sur la théorie de l’aimantation par influence fondée sur la thermodynamique (1888) à son article Sur le diamagnétisme (1913), en passant par ses Leçons sur l’électricité et le magnétisme (1892), ses idées théoriques sont en constante évolution. Concernant le problème du diamagnétisme, mon travail permet de mettre en évidence plusieurs facteurs décisifs dans le processus de construction de sa théorie (un article de Parker sur le principe de Carnot (1889), une lettre envoyée par Curie (1902) ou encore les réflexions de Duhem sur la stabilité de l’équilibre électrique menées à partir de 1896). La thèse aborde également l’approche originale de Duhem dans l’étude des systèmes renfermant des courants électriques, étude qui le conduit à considérer l’électromagnétisme comme une branche se détachant très tôt du tronc commun formé par l’essentiel de l’énergétique, tout en prolongeant la théorie de Helmholtz. Duhem échouera dans sa tentative de convaincre ses contemporains de la supériorité de cette théorie logique par rapport à celle de MaxwellThe object of this work is the analysis of Pierre Duhem's theoretical works in the field of magnetism and electromagnetism, very little studied up to now and often overshadowed by his contributions to philosophy and history of science. These works, however, correspond to an abundant scientific production (over 3500 pages), spread out over his whole career. My work allows to highlight the richness of his work in physics, as well as the trial-and-error process accompanying the development of his general thermodynamics, an ambitious and original program in the scientific context of time. From his thesis on the theory of magnetization by induction based on thermodynamics (1888) through his Lessons on electricity and magnetism (1892) to his article On diamagnetism (1913), his theoretical ideas are in constant evolution. Concerning the problem of diamagnetism, my work can highlight several decisive factors in the process of elaborating his theory (an article by Parker on the principle of Carnot (1889), a letter sent by Curie (1902) or Duhem’s thoughts on the stability of electrical equilibrium (1896, 1903)). The thesis also discusses Duhem's original approach to the study of systems containing electric currents, study that led to consider electromagnetism as a branch breaking away very early from the common core formed by the bulk of his energetics, while extending the theory of Helmholtz. Duhem will fail in his attempt to convince his contemporaries of the superiority of this logical theory compared to that of Maxwell
7
Wipf, Nicolas. "Pierre Duhem (1861 – 1916) et la théorie du magnétisme fondée sur la thermodynamique." Thesis, Lille 1, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011LIL10030/document.
Анотація:
L’objet de ce travail est l’analyse des travaux théoriques de Pierre Duhem dans le domaine du magnétisme et de l’électromagnétisme, très peu étudiés jusqu’ici et souvent éclipsés par ses contributions à la philosophie et à l’histoire des sciences. Ces travaux correspondent toutefois à une production scientifique abondante (plus de 3500 pages), s’étalant sur toute sa carrière. Mon travail permet de mettre en évidence la richesse de son œuvre en sciences physiques, ainsi que les tâtonnements accompagnant l’élaboration de sa thermodynamique générale, un programme ambitieux et original dans le contexte scientifique de l’époque. De sa thèse sur la théorie de l’aimantation par influence fondée sur la thermodynamique (1888) à son article Sur le diamagnétisme (1913), en passant par ses Leçons sur l’électricité et le magnétisme (1892), ses idées théoriques sont en constante évolution. Concernant le problème du diamagnétisme, mon travail permet de mettre en évidence plusieurs facteurs décisifs dans le processus de construction de sa théorie (un article de Parker sur le principe de Carnot (1889), une lettre envoyée par Curie (1902) ou encore les réflexions de Duhem sur la stabilité de l’équilibre électrique menées à partir de 1896). La thèse aborde également l’approche originale de Duhem dans l’étude des systèmes renfermant des courants électriques, étude qui le conduit à considérer l’électromagnétisme comme une branche se détachant très tôt du tronc commun formé par l’essentiel de l’énergétique, tout en prolongeant la théorie de Helmholtz. Duhem échouera dans sa tentative de convaincre ses contemporains de la supériorité de cette théorie logique par rapport à celle de MaxwellThe object of this work is the analysis of Pierre Duhem's theoretical works in the field of magnetism and electromagnetism, very little studied up to now and often overshadowed by his contributions to philosophy and history of science. These works, however, correspond to an abundant scientific production (over 3500 pages), spread out over his whole career. My work allows to highlight the richness of his work in physics, as well as the trial-and-error process accompanying the development of his general thermodynamics, an ambitious and original program in the scientific context of time. From his thesis on the theory of magnetization by induction based on thermodynamics (1888) through his Lessons on electricity and magnetism (1892) to his article On diamagnetism (1913), his theoretical ideas are in constant evolution. Concerning the problem of diamagnetism, my work can highlight several decisive factors in the process of elaborating his theory (an article by Parker on the principle of Carnot (1889), a letter sent by Curie (1902) or Duhem’s thoughts on the stability of electrical equilibrium (1896, 1903)). The thesis also discusses Duhem's original approach to the study of systems containing electric currents, study that led to consider electromagnetism as a branch breaking away very early from the common core formed by the bulk of his energetics, while extending the theory of Helmholtz. Duhem will fail in his attempt to convince his contemporaries of the superiority of this logical theory compared to that of Maxwell
8
Tamogami, Kenjiro. "Le corporel et l'incorporel dans les premières oeuvres d'Henri Michaux (1922-1935)." Paris 8, 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005PA082548.
9
Maroupas, Nikolaos. "Pragmatisme : une philosophie anarchiste ? : une généalogie : Proudhon, Bakounine, James, Dewey." Thesis, Paris 10, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA100110/document.
Анотація:
Le pragmatisme, en tant que courant philosophique, et l'anarchisme, en tant que courant politique, semblent être reliés par deux approches d'apparence complémentaire : le premier est souvent considéré comme politiquement neutre alors que le second comme philosophiquement indifférent. Notre étude consiste à examiner cette double neutralité et, suivant notre interrogation, à savoir « le pragmatisme, est-il une philosophie anarchiste ? », valoriser et évaluer la possibilité d'une réponse positive, car les conséquences politiques de l'un et les conséquences philosophiques de l'autre, ainsi que les causes de leur prétendue indifférence complémentaire, nous inspirent l'idée d'une architecture commune. Dans un premier temps, nous tentons de situer cette architecture dans la philosophie de James et de Dewey se focalisant sur le rapport du pragmatisme à la démocratie. Nous dégageons ainsi les traits principaux d'une philosophie de l'expérience conforme aux exigences que les philosophes pragmatistes prêtent à la démocratie, car c'est l'expérience qui permet à la démocratie de voir sa dimension éthique, très présente chez les pragmatistes, devenir politique. Dans un deuxième temps, nous examinons l'articulation de ce que l'on peut appeler doxa anarchiste avec les thèses philosophiques que James et Dewey voient composer la philosophie de l'expérience. Nous nous focalisons notamment sur la pensée de Proudhon et de Bakounine, dont la filiation nous semble porteuse du même esprit anti-absolutiste qui correspond à la dimension critique de la philosophie de l'expériencePragmatism, as a philosophical movement, and anarchism, as a political one, seem to be connected by two seemingly complementary approaches: pragmatism is often considered as politically neutral, while anarchism as philosophically indifferent. The aim of our study is to examine this double neutrality and, following our interrogation, namely « is pragmatism an anarchist philosophy? », to evaluate the possibility of a positive answer, the political consequences of the one and the philosophical consequences of the other, and also the causes of their alleged complementary indifference, inspiring us the idea of a commun architecture. First, we try to locate this architecture in the philosophy of James and Dewey, focusing on the relationship of pragmatism to democracy. Thus, we point out the main features of a philosophy of experience fitting the demands - in a pragmatic perspective - of democracy. For it is only experience that allows democracy to see its ethical dimension - very present among pragmatists - become political. Second, we examine the articulation of what we can call anarchist doxa with the philosophical assertions that form, according to James and Dewey, the philosophy of experience. We focus, in particular, on the thought of Proudhon and Bakunin, whose kinship seems to carry the same anti-absolutist spirit that forms the critical dimension of the philosophy of experience
10
Olson, Ted. "He can pierce your heart in a single line': Comparing James Still of Appalachia and Alphonse Daudet of Provence, Two 'Regional' Writers with National Impacts." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2013. https://dc.etsu.edu/etsu-works/1112.
Книги з теми "Jamet (Pierre)":
1
Nicollet. Pierre-Marie Jamet presente Nicollet, peinture. [France]: P.M.J. Editions, 1992.
2
Chrétien, Edmond. Le bienheureux Pierre-François Jamet, 1762-1845: Serviteur des handicapés et recteur d'université. Paris: Editions du Cerf, 1987.
3
Mansouri, Abdelmajid. Lecture psychanalytique de Pierre Janet. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2011.
4
1947-, Pierce Janet, and RHA Gallagher Gallery (Dublin, Ireland), eds. Janet Pierce: Soul-lands. Dublin: RHA Gallagher Gallery, 1996.
5
1947-, Pierce Janet, and RHA Gallagher Gallery (Dublin, Ireland), eds. Janet Pierce: Soul-lands. Dublin: RHA Gallagher Gallery, 1996.
6
Guitet, James. James Guitet: Peintures, livres : 15 juin-17 septembre 1989, Rochebelle, Alès : Musée bibliothèque Pierre-André Benoit. Alès [France]: Le Musée, 1989.
7
Kelly, William L. Psychology of the unconscious: Mesmer, Janet, Freud, Jung, and current issues. Buffalo, N.Y: Prometheus Books, 1991.
8
Oulahbib, Lucien-Samir. Actualité de Pierre Janet: En quoi est-il plus important que Freud pour les sciences morales et politiques. Paris: L'Harmattan, 2009.
9
Arts, Honolulu Academy of, ed. In celebration of light: Photographs from the collection of Cherye R. and James F. Pierce. Honolulu, Hawaii: Honolulu Academy of Arts, 2003.
10
Perkins, Dorothy Neblett. Descendants of Samuel, James, and Martha Perkins: With collateral lines, Barham, Kemper, Marsh, Pearce, Pierce, Ussery. Rancho Santa Fe, Calif: Neblett Press, 1999.
Частини книг з теми "Jamet (Pierre)":
1
Ratner, Carl, David O. Clark, Miki Takasuna, Peter J. Behrens, David L. Seim, Thomas J. Martinez, and David C. Devonis. "Janet, Pierre." In Encyclopedia of the History of Psychological Theories, 568–69. New York, NY: Springer US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0463-8_191.
2
Hoffmann, Nicolas. "Pierre Janet." In Zwänge und Depressionen, 367–71. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60307-5_7.
3
Moreno Martínez, Alejandro. "Janet, Pierre." In The Palgrave Biographical Encyclopedia of Psychology in Latin America, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38726-6_86-1.
4
Moreno Martínez, Alejandro. "Janet, Pierre." In The Palgrave Biographical Encyclopedia of Psychology in Latin America, 619–21. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56781-1_86.
5
Schils, René. "Pierre Curie." In How James Watt Invented the Copier, 111–16. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0860-4_18.
6
Ribi, Alfred. "Pierre Janet (1859–1947)." In Neurose – an der Grenze zwischen krank und gesund, 139–48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16148-3_8.
7
Garrabé, Jean. "Pierre Janet (1857-1949)." In WPA Anthology of French Language Psychiatric Texts, 427–46. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470986738.ch25.
8
Walusinski, Olivier. "Paul Sollier, Pierre Janet, and Their Vicinity." In Hysteria: The Rise of an Enigma, 126–38. Basel: S. KARGER AG, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000360056.
9
Pérez-Rincón, Héctor. "Pierre Janet, Sigmund Freud and Charcot’s Psychological and Psychiatric Legacy." In Frontiers of Neurology and Neuroscience, 115–24. Basel: KARGER, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000321781.
10
Schneck, Peter. "Pushing the ‘Envelope of Circumstances’: Reading the Social with Henry James and Pierre Bourdieu." In Reading the Social in American Studies, 79–103. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93551-1_4.
Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Jamet (Pierre)":
1
Galily, Daniel. "The theory of nineteenth-century American pragmatism." In 9th International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade - Serbia, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.09.11105g.
Анотація:
The purpose of this overview is to give a short introduction to the ideas and activities of nineteenth-century American pragmatism theory for a philosophy conference at the BEN Science Institute in Bulgaria. Pragmatism is a philosophical theory that sees thought as a tool and device for predicting, solving problems and planning action. The philosophy of pragmatism addresses the practical consequences of ideas by examining them in the light of human experience, so that the truth of a claim is determined by practical results and the utility it serves. Pragmatism began in the United States around 1870 by Charles S. Pierce. In addition to Peirce, philosophers such as William James and John Dewey who were members of the “Metaphysical Club” held at Cambridge University in the late 19th century (where the theory was formulated) helped to develop its principles. By reviewing the theory of pragmatism, we must concentrate on the Pragmatic Maxim, the rule for clarifying ideas, which for both Peirce and James, was the core of pragmatism. Another important idea in the theory is Skepticism and fallibilism. This idea claims, according to Pierce, that we should try to doubt propositions and keep them only if they are with absolutely certainty and there is no way to doubt them. The test of certainty, as Peirce points out, lies in the individual mind: trial by doubt is something each must do for himself, and the examination of our beliefs is guided by reflection on hypothetical possibilities: we cannot trust our perceptual beliefs. For example, because we cannot rule out the possibility that they were created by a dream or by evil scientists manipulating our minds. The more we try to avoid errors, the more likely we are to miss truths; And the more effort we put into searching for truths, the more likely we are to introduce errors. The doubt method may make sense in the special case where enormous weight is given to avoiding mistakes, even if it means losing truth. Once we recognize that we are making a practical decision about the relative importance of two good options, the Cartesian strategy no longer seems the only rational one. Inquiry, as already suggested, is pragmatic accounts of the normative standards to which we must act in arriving at beliefs about the world cast in terms of how we can conduct inquiries in a disciplined, self-controlled manner. That is, our ability to think about external things and constantly improve our understanding of them is based on our experience. It would be wrong to conclude that pragmatism is limited to the United States or that the only important pragmatist thinkers were Peirce, James, and Dewey. Richard Rorty has described his philosophy as “pragmatist” on several occasions - what pragmatists teach us about truth, he tells us, is that there is nothing very systematic or constructive to say about truth at all.
2
Gobira, Pablo, Priscila Rezende Portugal, and Emanuelle de Oliveira Silva. "La hipercorteza y el contexto de la convergencia del arte con las info-cognotecnologías." In LINK 2021. Tuwhera Open Access, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24135/link2021.v2i1.75.g81.
Анотація:
El trabajo aquí presentado trae una reflexión proveniente del grupo Laboratório de Poéticas Fronteiriças (http://labfront.tk), registrado en el directorio del CNPq y certificado por la Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais. Aquí mostramos un fragmento, basado en algunas de nuestras investigaciones bibliográficas, que tiene como objetivo reunir un aspecto específico de las artes digitales conocido como “arte telemático”. Además de expresarse a través de sistemas telemáticos, entendemos a las obras de arte telemáticas en lo que respecta a sus conexiones con las infotecnologías y cognotecnologías en el contexto de la convergencia científica y tecnológica que estamos atravesando actualmente. Las infotecnologías tratan directamente el momento de la historia de la humanidad en el que hemos entrado desde la mitad del siglo XX, una era basada en la información, donde múltiples tecnologías permiten acceder a una gran cantidad de datos y conocimientos, permitiendo un desarrollo aún mayor en la investigación en diversas áreas (GREY; JAMES, 2000, p. 3). Las cognotecnologías, por otro lado, son los desarrollos que permiten una conexión cognitiva. Recrean artificialmente cómo funciona el cerebro humano, a través de descubrimientos neurocientíficos y relacionándose con la forma en que funciona nuestra mente, presentándose como una tecnología disruptiva que permite extrapolar las interacciones infotecnológicas tradicionales entre humanos y máquinas (DELTELL; PÉREZ, 2020). Dicho esto, traemos a la discusión la idea de la hipercorteza. Está anclada en la relación entre la idea de “inteligencia global compartida” y la extrapolación del cerebro humano. Los desarrollos infocognotecnológicos crean una hipercorteza de procesos cognitivos individuales transformadores y mediadores, cambiando el modus operandi de las relaciones sociales. De esta manera, al comprender la función biológica de la corteza humana, que está directamente conectada con la hipercorteza, podemos darnos cuenta de la posibilidad de expandir su capacidad con la ayuda de métodos tecnológicos. Además, permite que dicha expansión de la conciencia humana trascienda su dimensión física, permitiendo una vinculación en los procesos hombre-máquina y máquina-máquina (GOBIRA, SILVA, PORTUGAL, 2021)]. Esta idea, ampliamente apoyada por las reflexiones de Roy Ascott (2003) y de Pierre Levy (2017), trata directamente de las posibilidades de expansión del neocórtex humano. En nuestro trabajo analizaremos obras de arte digitales en las que se explora poéticamente la dimensión info-cognotecnológica en busca de una convergencia científica, tecnológica y artística. Podremos demostrar cómo diferentes obras de arte terminan conceptualmente, o de manera teórico-práctica, implementando lo que la humanidad experimenta físicamente.
3
Gobira, Pablo, Priscila Rezende Portugal, and Emanuelle de Oliveira Silva. "O hipercórtex e o contexto da convergência da arte com as info-cognotecnologias." In LINK 2021. Tuwhera Open Access, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24135/link2021.v2i1.75.g82.
Анотація:
O trabalho aqui apresentado traz uma reflexão originada do grupo Laboratório de Poéticas Fronteiriças (http://labfront.tk), cadastrado no diretório do CNPq e certificado pela Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais. Aqui mostramos um trecho, com base em algumas de nossas pesquisas bibliográficas, que visa reunir um aspecto específico das artes digitais conhecido como “arte telemática”. Além de se expressar por meio de sistemas telemáticos, entendemos as obras de arte telemáticas no que se refere às suas conexões com as tecnologias de informação e de tecnologia no contexto da convergência científica e tecnológica pela qual navegamos atualmente. As infotecnologias lidam diretamente com o momento da história da humanidade em que entramos desde a metade do século XX. Uma era baseada na informação, onde múltiplas tecnologias permitem o acesso a uma grande quantidade de dados e conhecimentos, permitindo um desenvolvimento ainda maior nas pesquisas em diversas áreas (GREY; JAMES, 2000, p. 3). Cognotecnologias, por outro lado, são os desenvolvimentos que permitem uma conexão cognitiva. Eles recriam artificialmente como funciona o cérebro humano, por meio de descobertas neurocientíficas e relacionando-se com a forma como nossa mente funciona, apresentando-se como uma tecnologia disruptiva que permite a extrapolação das interações infotecnológicas tradicionais entre humanos e máquinas (DELTELL; PÉREZ, 2020). Posto isto, trazemos para a discussão a ideia do hipercórtex. Está ancorado na relação entre a ideia de “inteligência global compartilhada” e a extrapolação do cérebro-pan dos humanos. Os desenvolvimentos info-cognotecnológicos criam um hipercórtex de processos cognitivos individuais transformativos e mediativos, mudando o modus operandi das relações sociais. Desta forma, ao compreender a função biológica do córtex humano, que está diretamente ligado ao hipercórtex, podemos perceber a possibilidade de expandir sua capacidade com o auxílio de métodos tecnológicos, além de permitir que tal consciência humana à expansão transcende a sua dimensão física, permitindo uma articulação nos processos homem-máquina e máquina-máquina (GOBIRA, SILVA, PORTUGAL, 2021)]. Esta ideia, também aqui amplamente apoiada nas reflexões de Roy Ascott (2003), como de Pierre Levy (2017), trata diretamente das possibilidades de expansão do neocórtex humano. Em nosso trabalho, analisaremos obras de arte digitais nas quais a dimensão info-cognológica é poeticamente em busca de uma convergência científica, tecnológica e artística. Poderemos demonstrar como diferentes obras de arte acabam conceitualmente — ou de forma teórico-prática — concretizando o que a humanidade vivencia fisicamente.
4
Xiaozhi Wang and Neil Pegg, ISSC 2022 Editors. "Proceedings of the 21st International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress VOLUME 1 Technical Committee Reports." In 21st International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Volume 1. SNAME, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5957/issc-2022-committee-vol-1.
Анотація:
Preface The first volume contains the eight Technical Committee reports, and the second volume contains the reports of the eight Specialist Committees, presented and discussed at the 21st International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress (ISSC 2022) in Vancouver (Canada), on September 11–15, 2022. The Official Discussers’ reports and all floor discussions, including the replies by the committees, will be published after the Congress in electronic form. Table of Contents Preface .............................................................................................................iii Committee I.1: Environment .........................................................................1 Alexander Babanin (Chair); Mariana Bernardino; Franz von Bock und Polach; Ricardo Campos,; Jun Ding; Sanne van Essen; Tomaso Gaggero; Maryam Haroutunian; Vanessa Katsardi; Alexander Nilva; Arttu Polojarvi; Erik Vanem; Jungyong Wang; Huidong Zhang; Tingyao Zhu Committee I.2: Loads ................................................................................125 Ole Andreas Hermundstad (Chair); Shuhong Chai; Guillaume de Hauteclocque; Sheng Dong; Chih-Chung Fang; Thomas B. Johannessen; Celso Morooka; Masayoshi Oka; Jasna Prpić-Oršić; Alessandro Sacchet; Mahmud Sazidy; Bahadir Ugurlu; Roberto Vettor; Peter Wellens Committee II-1: Quasi-Static Response ....................................................227 James Underwood (Chair); Erick Alley; Jerolim Andrić; Dario Boote; Zhen Gao; Ad Van Hoeve; Jasmin Jelovica; Yasumi Kawamura; Yooil Kim; Jianhu Liu; Sime Malenica; Heikki Remes; Asokendu Samanta; Krzysztof Woloszyk; Deqing Yang Committee II.2: Dynamic Response .........................................................301 Gaute Storhaug (Chair); Daniele Dessi; Sharad Dhavalikar; Ingo Drummen; Michael Holtmann; Young-Cheol Huh; Lorenzo Moro; Andre Paiva; Svein Sævik; Rong-Juin Shyu; Shan Wang; Sue Wang; WenWei Wu; Yasuhira Yamada; Guiyong Zhang Committee III.1: Ultimate Strength ...........................................................395 Paul E. Hess (Chair); Chen An; Lars Brubak; Xiao Chen; Jinn Tong Chiu; Jurek Czujko; Ionel Darie; Guoqing Feng; Marco Gaiotti; Beom Seon Jang; Adnan Kefal; Sukron Makmun; Jonas Ringsberg; Jani Romanoff; Saad Saad-Eldeen; Ingrid Schipperen; Kristjan Tabri; Yikun Wang; Daisuke Yanagihara Committee III.2: Fatigue and Fracture ......................................................501 Yordan Garbatov (Chair); Sigmund K Ås; Henk Den Besten; Philipp Haselbach; Adrian Kahl; Dale Karr; Myung Hyun Kim; Junjie Liu; Marcelo Igor Lourenço de Souza; Wengang Mao; Eeva Mikkola; Naoki Osawa; Fredhi Agung Prasetyo; Mauro Sicchiero; Suhas Vhanmane; Marta Vicente del Amo; Jingxia Yue Committee IV.1: Design Principles and Criteria .......................................643 Matthew Collette (Chair); Piero Caridis; Petar Georgiev; Torfinn Hørte; Han Koo Jeong; Rafet emek Kurt; Igor Ilnytskiy; Tetsuo Okada; Charles Randall; Zbigniew Sekulski; Matteo Sidari; Zhihu Zhan; Ling Zhu Committee IV.2: Design Methods .............................................................745 Andrea Ivaldi (Chair); Abbas Bayatfar; Jean-David Caprace; Gennadiy Egorov; Svein Erling Heggelund; Shinichi Hirakawa; Jung Min Kwon; Dan Mcgreer; Pero Prebeg; Robert Sielski; Mark Slagmolen; Adam Sobey; Wenyong Tang; Jiameng Wu Subject Index .............................................................................................815 Author Index ...............................................................................................817
5
Xiaozhi Wang and Neil Pegg, ISSC 2022 Editors. "Proceedings of the 21st International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress VOLUME 3 Discussions." In 21st International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress Volume 3 Discussions. SNAME, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5957/issc-2022-discussion-vol-3.
Анотація:
Committee I.1: Environment Alexander Babanin (Chair); Mariana Bernardino; Franz von Bock und Polach; Ricardo Campos,; Jun Ding; Sanne van Essen; Tomaso Gaggero; Maryam Haroutunian; Vanessa Katsardi; Alexander Nilva; Arttu Polojarvi; Erik Vanem; Jungyong Wang; Huidong Zhang; Tingyao Zhu Floor Discussers: Florian Sprenger; Carlos Guedes Soares; Henk den Besten Committee I.2: Loads Ole Andreas Hermundstad (Chair); Shuhong Chai; Guillaume de Hauteclocque; Sheng Dong; Chih-Chung Fang; Thomas B. Johannessen; Celso Morooka; Masayoshi Oka; Jasna Prpić-Oršić; Alessandro Sacchet; Mahmud Sazidy; Bahadir Ugurlu; Roberto Vettor; Peter Wellens Official Discusser: Hayden Marcollo Committee II-1: Quasi-Static Response James Underwood (Chair); Erick Alley; Jerolim Andrić Dario Boote; Zhen Gao; Ad Van Hoeve; Jasmin Jelovica; Yasumi Kawamura; Yooil Kim; Jian Hu Liu; Sime Malenica; Heikki Remes; Asokendu Samanta; Krzysztof Woloszyk; Deqing Yang Official Discusser: Prof. T. Yoshikwa Committee II.2: Dynamic Response Gaute Storhaug (Chair); Daniele Dessi; Sharad Dhavalikar; Ingo Drummen; Michael Holtmann; Young-Cheol Huh; Lorenzo Moro; Andre Paiva; Svein Sævik; Rong-Juin Shyu; Shan Wang; Sue Wang; WenWei Wu; Yasuhira Yamada; Guiyong Zhang Floor Discussers: Ling Zhu; Tomoki Takami; Anriette (Annie) Bekker; Bruce Quinton; Robert Sielski Committee III.1: Ultimate Strength Paul E. Hess (Chair); Chen An; Lars Brubak; Xiao Chen; Jinn Tong Chiu; Jurek Czujko; Ionel Darie; Guoqing Feng; Marco Gaiotti; Beom Seon Jang; Adnan Kefal; Sukron Makmun; Jonas Ringsberg; Jani Romanoff; Saad Saad-Eldeen; Ingrid Schipperen; Kristjan Tabri; Yikun Wang; Daisuke Yanagihara Official Discusser: Jørgen Amdahl Committee III.2: Fatigue and Fracture Yordan Garbatov (Chair); Sigmund K Ås; Henk Den Besten; Philipp Haselbach; Adrian Kahl; Dale Karr; Myung Hyun Kim; Junjie Liu; Marcelo Igor Lourenço de Souza; Wengang Mao; Eeva Mikkola; Naoki Osawa; Fredhi Agung Prasetyo; Mauro Sicchiero; Suhas Vhanmane; Marta Vicente del Amo; Jingxia Yue Official Discusser Weicheng Cui Floor Discussers: Robert Sielski; Sören Ehlers; Stephane Paboeuf; Teresa Magoga Committee IV.1: Design Principles and Criteria Matthew Collette (Chair); Piero Caridis; Petar Georgiev; Torfinn Hørte; Han Koo Jeong; Rafet emek Kurt; Igor Ilnytskiy; Tetsuo Okada; Charles Randall; Zbigniew Sekulski; Matteo Sidari; Zhihu Zhan; Ling Zhu Official Discusser: Enrico Rizzuto Committee IV.2: Design Methods Andrea Ivaldi (Chair); Abbas Bayatfar; Jean-David Caprace; Gennadiy Egorov; Svein Erling Heggelund; Shinichi Hirakawa; Jung Min Kwon; Dan Mcgreer; Pero Prebeg; Robert Sielski; Mark Slagmolen; Adam Sobey; Wenyong Tang; Jiameng Wu Official Discusser: Mario Dogliani Committee V.1: Accidental Limit States Bruce Quinton; Gaetano De Luca; Topan Firmandha; Mihkel Körgesaar; Hervé Le Sourne; Ken Nahshon; Gabriele Notaro; Kourosh Parsa; Smiljko Rudan; Katsuyuki Suzuki; Osiris Valdez Banda; CareyWalters; Deyu Wang; Zhaolong Yu Official Discusser: Manolis Samuelides Committee V.2: Experimental Methods Sören Ehlers (Chair); Nagi Abdussamie; Kim Branner; ShiXiao Fu; Martijn Hoogeland; Kari Kolari; Paul Lara; Constantine Michailides; Hideaki Murayama; Cesare Rizzo; Jung Kwan Seo; Patrick Kaeding Official Discusser: Giles Thomas Committee V.3: Materials and Fabrication Technology Lennart Josefson (Chair); Konstantinos Anyfantis; Bianca de Carvalho Pinheiro; Bai-Qiao Chen; Pingsha Dong; Nicole Ferrari; Koji Gotoh; James Huang; Matthias Krause; Kun Liu; Stephane Paboeuf; Stephen van Duin; Fang Wang; Albert Zamarin Official Discusser: Frank Roland Floor Discussers Alessandro Caleo; Agnes Marie Horn; Krzysztof Woloszyk; Robert Sielski Committee V.4: Offshore Renewable Energy Atanasios Kolios (Chair); Kyong-Hwan Kim; Chen Hsing Cheng; Elif Oguz; Pablo Morato; Freeman Ralph; Chuang Fang; Chunyan Ji; Marc Le Boulluec; Thomas Choisnet; Luca Greco; Tomoaki Utsunomiya; Kourosh Rezanejad; Charles Rawson; Jose Miguel Rodrigues Official Discusser: Amy Robertson Committee V.5: Special Vessels Darren Truelock (Chair); Jason Lavroff; Dustin Pearson; Zbigniew (Jan) Czaban; Hanbing Luo; Fuhua Wang; Ivan Catipovic; Ermina Begovic; Yukichi Takaoka; Claudia Loureiro; Chang Yong Song; Esther Garcia; Alexander Egorov; Jean-Baptiste Souppez; Pradeep Sensharma; Rachel Nicholls-Lee Official Discusser: Jaye Falls Floor Discussers: Jasmin Jelovica; Stephane Paboeuf; Sören Ehlers Committee V.6: Ocean Space Utilization Sebastian Schreier (Chair); Felice Arena; Harry Bingham; Nuno Fonseca; Zhiqiang Hu; Debabrata Karmakar; Ekaterina Kim; Hui Li; Pengfei Liu; Motohiko Murai; Spiro J Pahos; Chao Tian; George Wang Official Discusser: Hideyuki Suzuki Floor Discussers: Robert Sielski; Sue Wang; Sarat Mohapatra; Gaute Storhaug; Henk den Besten Committee V.7: Structural Longevity Iraklis Lazakis (Chair); Bernt Leira; Nianzhong Chen; Geovana Drumond; Chi-Fang Lee; Paul Jurisic; Bin Liu; Alysson Mondoro; Pooria Pahlavan; Xinghua Shi; Ha Cheol Song; Tadashi Sugimura; Christian Jochum; Tommaso Coppola Official Discusser: Timo de Beer Floor Discusser: Krzysztof Woloszyk Committee V.8: Subsea Technology Agnes Marie Horn (Chair); Tauhid Rahman; Ilson Pasqualino; Menglan Duan; Zhuang Kang; Michael Rye Andersen; Yoshihiro Konno; Chunsik Shim; Angelo Teixeira; Selda Oterkus; Blair Thornton; Brajendra Mishra Official Discusser: Segen F. Estefen