Готові списки джерел за темами / Frogs New Guinea Identification

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Frogs New Guinea Identification"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021
Оновлено: 2 лютого 2022

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Frogs New Guinea Identification".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Зміст

  1. Статті в журналах
  2. Дисертації
  3. Книги
  4. Частини книг

Статті в журналах з теми "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

BROWN, JASON L., EVAN TWOMEY, ADOLFO AMÉZQUITA, MOISÉS BARBOSA DE SOUZA, JANALEE P. CALDWELL, STEFAN LÖTTERS, RUDOLF VON MAY, et al. "A taxonomic revision of the Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya (Amphibia: Dendrobatidae)." Zootaxa 3083, no. 1 (October 28, 2011): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3083.1.1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
The Neotropical poison frog genus Ranitomeya is revised, resulting in one new genus, one new species, five synonymies and one species classified as nomen dubium. We present an expanded molecular phylogeny that contains 235 terminals, 104 of which are new to this study. Notable additions to this phylogeny include seven of the 12 species in the minuta group, 15 Ranitomeya amazonica, 20 R. lamasi, two R. sirensis, 30 R. ventrimaculata and seven R. uakarii. Previous researchers have long recognized two distinct, reciprocally monophyletic species groups contained within Ranitomeya, sensu Grant et al. 2006: the ventrimaculata group, which is distributed throughout much of the Amazon, and the minuta group of the northern Andes and Central America. We restrict Ranitomeya to the former group and erect a new genus, Andinobates Twomey, Brown, Amézquita & Mejía-Vargas gen. nov., for members of the minuta group. Other major taxonomic results of the current revision include the following: (i) A new species, Ranitomeya toraro Brown, Caldwell, Twomey, Melo-Sampaio & Souza sp. nov., is described from western Brazil. This species has long been referred to as R. ventrimaculata but new morphological and phylogenetic data place it sister to R. defleri. (ii) Examination of the holotype of R. ventrimaculata revealed that this specimen is in fact a member of what is currently referred to as R. duellmani, therefore, Dendrobates duellmani Schulte 1999 is considered herein a junior synonym of D. ventrimaculatus Shreve 1935 (= R. ventrimaculata). (iii) For the frogs that were being called R. ventrimaculata prior to this revision, the oldest available and therefore applicable name is R. variabilis. Whereas previous definitions of R. variabilis were restricted to spotted highland frogs near Tarapoto, Peru, our data suggest that this color morph is conspecific with lowland striped counterparts. Therefore, the definition of R. variabilis is greatly expanded to include most frogs which were (prior to this revision) referred to as R. ventrimaculata. (iv) Phylogenetic and bioacoustic evidence support the retention of R. amazonica as a valid species related to R. variabilis as defined in this paper. Based on phylogenetic data, R. amazonica appears to be distributed throughout much of the lower Amazon, as far east as French Guiana and the Amazon Delta and as far west as Iquitos, Peru. (v) Behavioral and morphological data, as well as phylogenetic data which includes topotypic material of R. sirensis and numerous samples of R. lamasi, suggest that the names sirensis, lamasi and biolat are applicable to a single, widespread species that displays considerable morphological variation throughout its range. The oldest available name for this group is sirensis Aichinger; therefore, we expand the definition of R. sirensis. (vi) Ranitomeya ignea and R. intermedia, elevated to the species status in a previous revision, are placed as junior synonyms of R. reticulata and R. imitator, respectively. (vii) Ranitomeya rubrocephala is designated as nomen dubium. In addition to taxonomic changes, this revision includes the following: (i) Explicit definitions of species groups that are consistent with our proposed taxonomy. (ii) A comprehensive dichotomous key for identification of ‘small’ aposematic poison frogs of South and Central America. (iii) Detailed distribution maps of all Ranitomeya species, including unpublished localities for most species. In some cases, these records result in substantial range extensions (e.g., R. uakarii, R. fantastica). (iv) Tadpole descriptions for R. amazonica, R. flavovittata, R. imitator, R. toraro sp. nov., R. uakarii and R. variabilis; plus a summary of tadpole morphological data for Andinobates and Ranitomeya species. (v) A summary of call data on most members of Andinobates and Ranitomeya, including call data of several species that have not been published before. (vi) A discussion on the continued impacts of the pet trade on poison frogs (vii) A discussion on several cases of potential Müllerian mimicry within the genus Ranitomeya. We also give opinions regarding the current debate on recent taxonomic changes and the use of the name Ranitomeya.
2

Kraus, Fred, and Allen Allison. "New microhylid Frogs from the Muller Range, Papua New Guinea." ZooKeys 26 (October 30, 2009): 53–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.26.258.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Kraus, Fred. "New genus of diminutive microhylid frogs from Papua New Guinea." ZooKeys 48 (June 9, 2010): 39–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.48.446.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Menzies, J. I., and M. J. Tyler. "Litoria gracilenta (Anura : Hylidae) and related species in New Guinea." Australian Journal of Zoology 52, no. 2 (2004): 191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/zo03008.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
We examined a large collection (n = 132) of tree frogs, hitherto identified as Litoria gracilenta, from various localities in New Guinea and compared them with Litoria gracilenta from Queensland and with the recently described Litoria elkeae from far west New Guinea. We found that the frogs in question were neither L. gracilenta nor L. elkeae but comprised two distinct taxa described herein as new species.We call attention to the problems of performing statistical analysis on measurements of soft-bodied organisms and consider that the conclusions reached in this analysis are both conservative and realistic.
5

Menzies, J. I., Lester Russell, M. J. Tyler, and M. J. Mountain. "Fossil frogs from the central highlands of Papua New Guinea." Alcheringa: An Australasian Journal of Palaeontology 26, no. 2 (January 2002): 341–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03115510208619262.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Kraus, Fred. "New frogs (Anura: Microhylidae) from the mountains of western Papua New Guinea." Records of the Australian Museum 63, no. 1 (June 29, 2011): 53–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.63.2011.1584.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Kraus, Fred. "Two New Species of Frogs Related toBarygenys exsul(Microhylidae) from New Guinea." Herpetologica 69, no. 3 (September 2013): 314–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1655/herpetologica-d-12-00073.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Green, DM, and MP Simon. "Digital Microstructure in Ecologically Diverse Sympatric Microhylid Frogs, Genera Cophixalus and Sphenophryne (Amphibia, Anura), From Papua-New-Guinea." Australian Journal of Zoology 34, no. 2 (1986): 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/zo9860135.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
The extent of development of digital adhesive toe-pads in sympatric species of microhylid frogs, Cophixalus and Sphenophryne, correlates with the degree of arboreality exhibited by the species. The same basic structures and cell types are found in the toe-pads of these microhylid frogs as are found in other arboreal and semi- arboreal frogs of many diverse evolutionary lineages. A variety of types of cell surface, with unknown functional significance but potential systematic use, are found on the feet of these frogs. Allometric increase in adhesive-pad area in larger species is by widening of the toe-pad, as opposed to acquisition of accessory pads as in some hylid tree frogs.
9

Tyler, Michael J. "TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF SOME HYLID FROGS OF AUSTRALIA AND NEW GUINEA." Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 145, no. 1 (August 20, 2009): 91–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1965.tb02002.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Dahl, Chris, Stephen J. Richards, and Vojtech Novotny. "The Sepik River (Papua New Guinea) is not a dispersal barrier for lowland rain-forest frogs." Journal of Tropical Ecology 29, no. 6 (September 11, 2013): 477–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266467413000527.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Abstract:Major tropical rivers have been suggested to be important dispersal barriers that increase the beta diversity of animal communities in lowland rain forests. We tested this hypothesis using assemblages of frogs in the floodplains of the Sepik River, a major river system in Papua New Guinea. We surveyed frogs at five sites within a continuous 150 × 500-km area of lowland rain forest bisected by the Sepik, using standardized visual and auditory survey techniques. We documented 769 frogs from 44 species. The similarity in species composition decreased with logarithm of geographical distance between the sites, which ranged from 82 to 465 km. The similarity decay did not depend on whether or not the compared sites were separated by the Sepik River or whether the species were aquatic or terrestrial breeders. Likewise, a DCA ordination of frog assemblages did not show separation of sites by the river as a significant factor explaining their composition. Our results suggest that even major rivers, such as the Sepik, may not act as dispersal barriers. Rivers may not limit the distribution of frogs and therefore have a limited effect on determining frog species abundance and assemblage structure in rain forests.
Більше джерел
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Frogs New Guinea Identification" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах Книги

Дисертації з теми "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

Tyler, Michael J. "The biology and systematics of frogs : contributions submitted to The University of Adelaide /." Title page and summary only, 2002. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09SD/09sdt983.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Thesis (D.Sc.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Environmental Biology, 2002.
Vol. [2] comprises 6 reprints of published monographs in box folder; but numbered within the publications submitted listing (90 items), and within the 3 categories identified; at the beginning of vol. 1. Includes bibliographical references.
2

Halldin, Cara Nicole. "Disease Vectors of Papua New Guinea, Members of the Anopheles Punctulatus Species Complex (Diptera:Culicidae) – Molecular Diversity, Species Identification and Implications for Integrated Vector Management." Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1300368816.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Tyler, Michael J. 1937. "The biology and systematics of frogs : contributions submitted to The University of Adelaide / by Michael J. Tyler." 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/38581.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Vol. [2] comprises 6 reprints of published monographs in box folder; but numbered within the publications submitted listing (90 items), and within the 3 categories identified; at the beginning of vol. 1.
Includes bibliographical references.
2 v. (various pagings) :
Title page, contents and abstract only. The complete thesis in print form is available from the University Library.
Comprises 90 contributions to the biology and systematics of frogs, with particular emphasis upon those concerning the fauna of Australia and New Guinea. Provides an understanding of the state of knowledge when the author commenced his studies; permitting the extent of his work, an the nature of its significance, to be evaluated.
Thesis (D.Sc.)--University of Adelaide, Dept. of Environmental Biology, 2002

Книги з теми "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

Gill, Brian. New Zealand frogs & reptiles. Auckland, N.Z: D. Bateman, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Beehler, Bruce McP. Birds of New Guinea. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Flannery, Tim F. Mammals of New Guinea. Carina, Qld., Australia: Robert Brown & Associates, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Flannery, Tim F. Mammals of New Guinea. Ithaca, N.Y: Comstock/Cornell, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Menzies, J. I. The frogs of New Guinea and the Solomon Islands. Sofia: Pensoft, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Leach, Gregory J. Freshwater plants of Papua New Guinea. [Port Moresby]: University of Papua New Guinea Press, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Millar, Andreé. Orchids of Papua New Guinea. Portland, Or: Timber Press, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Hicks, Roger. Checklist of the birds of Papua New Guinea. [Boroko, Papua New Guinea]: Papua New Guinea Bird Society, 1987.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Williamson, Michael A. Snakes, lizards, turtles, frogs, toads, and salamanders of New Mexico. Santa Fe, N.M: Sunstone Press, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Gill, Brian. Collins handguide to the frogs and reptiles of New Zealand. Auckland: Collins, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Frogs New Guinea Identification":

1

Mörbel, J., T. Wetzel, and Gabriele Krczal. "Identification of a Tobamovirus Infecting New Guinea Impatiens." In Developments in Plant Pathology, 173. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0043-1_35.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

"6 Frogs and 'others'." In Managing Animals in New Guinea, 87–99. Routledge, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203633625-16.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

До бібліографії