We are proudly a Ukrainian website. Our country was attacked by Russian Armed Forces on Feb. 24, 2022.
You can support the Ukrainian Army by following the link: https://u24.gov.ua/.
Even the smallest donation is hugely appreciated!
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Expeditionary warfare".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Kasapoğlu, Can. "Turkey’s Burgeoning Defense Technological and Industrial Base and Expeditionary Military Policy." Transformation of Turkey’s Defense Industry: Causes, Context and Consequences 22, Summer 2020 (September 16, 2020): 115–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.25253/99.2020223.08.
As the incumbent Turkish administration strives to pursue more aspiring goals in foreign affairs, Turkey’s military policy is fast developing in line with this vision. The nation’s defense technological and industrial base can now produce various conventional weaponry. Of these, without a doubt, Turkey’s drone warfare assets have garnered the utmost attention among the international strategic community. In tandem, the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) have gradually gained an expeditionary posture with forward deployments across a broad axis, ranging from the Horn of Africa to the Gulf and the Mediterranean. Meanwhile, the military’s doctrinal order of battle has been transforming to address the unfolding hybrid warfare challenges in Ankara’s hinterland. Turkey’s proxy warfare capabilities have also registered an uptrend in this respect. Nevertheless, Ankara will have to deal with certain limitations in key segments, particularly 5th generation aircraft and strategic weapon systems which, together, represent a severe intra-war deterrence gap in Turkey’s defense posture. The Turkish administration will have to address this specific shortfall given the problematic threat landscape at the nation’s Middle Eastern doorstep. This study covers two interrelated strategic topics regarding Turkey’s national military capacity in the 21st century: its defense technological and industrial base (DTIB) and its military policy, both currently characterized by a burgeoning assertiveness.
3
Macdonald, Janet. "British Expeditionary Warfare and the Defeat of Napoleon, 1793–1815." Mariner's Mirror 103, no. 2 (April 3, 2017): 231–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00253359.2017.1312158.
Duffy, Michael. "British expeditionary warfare and the defeat of Napoleon, 1793–1815." Journal for Maritime Research 19, no. 1 (January 2, 2017): 85–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21533369.2017.1345163.
Walton, C. Dale. "A Review of “Naval Power and Expeditionary Warfare: Peripheral Campaigns and New Theatres of Naval Warfare”." Comparative Strategy 31, no. 1 (January 2012): 104–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2012.647518.
Simonenko, V. B., V. G. Abashin, P. E. Krynyukov, and P. A. Dulin. "Medical staff of the Russian Expeditionary Force and the Honorary Russian Legion in France." Clinical Medicine (Russian Journal) 101, no. 7-8 (September 22, 2023): 416–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.30629/0023-2149-2023-101-7-8-416-424.
The data on the warfare of the Russian Expeditionary Force and the Honorary Russian Legion in France during the First World War are presented. A study of the biographical data of the military doctors of the Force was carried out, and their fates were traced in some cases. Information is given about the hospitals and infi rmaries of the Russian Red Cross Society, their work in France. The facts about the sisters of mercy of the RRCS are also provided.
7
Lawrence, Mark. "The First Carlist War (1833–40), insurgency, Ramón Cabrera, and expeditionary warfare." Small Wars & Insurgencies 30, no. 4-5 (July 29, 2019): 797–817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2019.1638539.
Winegard, Lt Timothy C. "The Canadian Siberian Expeditionary Force, 1918–1919, and the Complications of Coalition Warfare." Journal of Slavic Military Studies 20, no. 2 (May 31, 2007): 283–328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13518040701378345.
Roach, J. Ashley. "The Law of Naval Warfare at the Turn of two Centuries." American Journal of International Law 94, no. 1 (January 2000): 64–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2555231.
The law of naval warfare as it existed in 1899 and as it is understood in 1999 exhibits a few similarities but many differences. The fundamental similarity is that the law of naval warfare can be seen, then as now, as consisting primarily of customary international law. The many differences in this law have been caused by the major changes in war at sea and the law of the sea. In 1899 war at sea meant combat primarily by gunfire between surface warships, control of maritime commerce, and shore bombardment. Today, war at sea also involves nuclear-powered aircraft carriers; supersonic aircraft, helicopters and tilt-rotor aircraft; submarines; high-speed patrol craft; ballistic, cruise, and other guided missiles; long-range secure communications for command, control, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance; radar; underwater sound technology; electronic and information warfare; satellites in space; unmanned aerial and undersea vehicles; and stealth and computer technology; as well as expeditionary and amphibious capabilities. Nevertheless, the fundamental role of navies continues to be to establish control at sea or to deny it to the enemy, linking that control to broad political and economic issues ashore. In view of these constants and changes, this article reviews the state of the law of naval warfare at the end of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and assesses its future prospects.
10
Wright, James R., and Leland B. Baskin. "Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Support for the American Expeditionary Forces by the US Army Medical Corps During World War I." Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 139, no. 9 (September 1, 2015): 1161–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2014-0528-hp.
Context Historical research on pathology and laboratory medicine services in World War I has been limited. In the Spanish American War, these efforts were primarily focused on tropical diseases. World War I problems that could be addressed by pathology and laboratory medicine were strikingly different because of the new field of clinical pathology. Geographic differences, changing war tactics, and trench warfare created new issues. Objectives To describe the scope of pathology and laboratory medicine services in World War I and the value these services brought to the war effort. Methods Available primary and secondary sources related to American Expeditionary Forces' laboratory services were analyzed and contrasted with the British and German approaches. Results The United States entered the war in April 1917. Colonel Joseph Siler, MD, a career medical officer, was the director, and Colonel Louis B. Wilson, MD, head of pathology at the Mayo Clinic, was appointed assistant director of the US Army Medical Corps Division of Laboratories and Infectious Disease, based in Dijon, France. During the next year, they organized 300 efficient laboratories to support the American Expeditionary Forces. Autopsies were performed to better understand treatment of battlefield injuries, effects of chemical warfare agents, and the influenza pandemic; autopsies also generated teaching specimens for the US Army Medical Museum. Bacteriology services focused on communicable diseases. Laboratory testing for social diseases was very aggressive. Significant advances in blood transfusion techniques, which allowed brief blood storage, occurred during the war but were not primarily overseen by laboratory services. Conclusions Both Siler and Wilson received Distinguished Service Medals. Wilson's vision for military pathology services helped transform American civilian laboratory services in the 1920s.
Higgins, Eric John, Ronald Leroy Higgs, Gregory Rodger Parkins, Vincent S. Tionquiao, and Christopher Kevin Wells. "Expeditionary warfare : force protection." Thesis, Monterey, California. Naval Postgraduate School, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10945/6917.
Includes supplementary material. In 2003, the Systems Engineering and Analysis students were tasked to develop a system of systems conceptual solution to provide force protection for the Sea Base conceptualized in the 2002 Expeditionary Warfare study. The Systems Engineering and Analysis Team used the Systems Engineering and Management process as the primary methodology to complete this multidisciplinary task. Survivability was identified as the most critical factor for evaluating the protection of the Sea Base and its transport assets. Threats to the Sea Base were reviewed, analyzed, and prioritized. System design and analysis focused on preliminary analyses of various sensors, search concepts, and weapons. These preliminary analyses identified capability gaps that were translated into functional concepts and proposed architectures for detailed modeling and analysis. These proposed architectures were identified as either Point or Distributed. In order to adequately determine the relative performance of the proposed architectures generated by the team, a thorough and systematic design of experiments was developed and applied in the Naval Simulation System and EXTEND. Based on the results obtained, the Systems Engineering and Analysis Team determined that a Distributed Sensor and Weapons architecture would significantly increase the survivability of future Expeditionary Warfare forces.
This site archives the final report, presentation, and supporting materials for the 2002 project. It will be
fully active by January 2003. The Expeditionary Warfare Integrated Project represents the combined effort
of more than 70 students and 18 faculty members from seven different Naval
Postgraduate School curricula representing all five US uniformed services and allies from
Singapore, Turkey, Greece, Tunisia, and Sweden. This project was the result of OPNAV
N7 tasking directing NPS’ Wayne Meyer Institute of Systems Engineering to use a top
down, system of systems approach to examine future Expeditionary Warfare operations
in terms of current and emerging operational concepts.
3
Kostelnik, Edward A. "Airmen first shaping the expeditionary air force for counterinsurgency." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2006. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/06Sep%5FKostelnik.
Fitzpatrick, John S. "Expeditionary airfield operations laying the foundation for future success /." CLICK HERE TO VIEW:, 2004. https://research.maxwell.af.mil/papers/ay2004/ari/fitzpatrick.pdf.
Lee, Hyun Seop. "Requirement analysis framework of naval military system for expeditionary warfare." Diss., Georgia Institute of Technology, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/50403.
Military systems are getting more complex due to the demands of various types of missions, rapidly evolving technologies, and budgetary constraints. In order to support complex military systems, there is a need to develop a new naval logistic asset that can respond to global missions effectively. This development is based on the requirement which must be satisfice-able within the budgetary constraints, address pressing real world needs, and allow designers to innovate. This research is conducted to produce feasible and viable requirements for naval logistic assets in complex military systems. The process to find these requirements has diverse uncertainties about logistics, environment and missions. To understand and address these uncertainties, this research includes instability analysis, operational analysis, sea state analysis and disembarkation analysis. By the adaptive Monte-Carlo simulation with maximum entropy, uncertainties are considered with corresponding probabilistic distribution. From Monte-Carlo simulation, the concept of Probabilistic Logistic Utility (PLU) was created as a measure of logistic ability. To demonstrate the usability of this research, this procedure is applied to a Medium Exploratory Connector (MEC) which is an Office of Naval Research (ONR) innovative naval prototype. Finally, the preliminary design and multi-criteria decision-making method become capable of including requirements considering uncertainties.
6
Fitzpatrick, Christian R. "Integration of robotics and 3D visualization to modernize the Expeditionary Warfare Demonstrator (EWD)." Thesis, Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2009. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2009/Sep/09Sep%5FFitzpatrick.pdf.
Thesis (M.S. in Modeling, Virtual Environments, and Simulation (MOVES))--Naval Postgraduate School, September 2009. Thesis Advisor(s): Brutzman, Don ; Sadagic, Amela. "September 2009." Description based on title screen as viewed on November 10, 2009. Author(s) subject terms: Battlespace Visualization, SunSPOT, X3D Earth, Amphibious Operations. Includes bibliographical references (p. 165-169). Also available in print.
7
Powell, Michael J. "Optimal allocation of assault support aircraft in the sustainment of Marine Corps expeditionary maneuver warfare." Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2002. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion-image/02sep%5FPowell.pdf.
Thesis (M.S. in Operations Research)--Naval Postgraduate School, September 2002. Thesis advisor(s): Javier Salmeron, David A. Schrady. Includes bibliographical references (p. 51-53). Also available online.
8
Liles, Christian F. M. "The development of amphibious/expeditionary warfare in the United States and the United Kingdom, 1945-1968 : a study in comparison, contrast and compromise." Thesis, King's College London (University of London), 2011. https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/the-development-of-amphibiousexpeditionary-warfare-in-the-united-states-and-the-united-kingdom-19451968--a-study-in-comparison-contrast-and-compromise(34f89418-2155-4e61-ae86-34dbee7b3d12).html.
Contemporary analysis has generally accepted that amphibious warfare development in the United States and the United Kingdom was quite similar, if not almost identical, during the Cold War. So-called 'parallel courses' of similar development, which had emerged during the interwar years and continued to evolve during the Second World War, converged even further in the post-war era. This effectively culminated in national approaches (or systems) that most closely reflected the US Naval Service's (i.e., US Navy and Marine Corps) World War II model, which had been used with legendary success in the Pacific through 1945. However, a comparative study of American and British developments from 1945 to 1968 at the strategic, organisational/institutional and tactical/operational levels of analysis reveals that there were significant, if not fundamental, differences. These variances-which had, in fact, materialised during the inter-war years and were consolidated during World War II-continued to evolve along parallel but different courses of development. In essence, they were based on naval versus maritime strategies, single-service versus inter-service (or joint) organizations/institutions, and combined arms versus joint warfare concepts, techniques and doctrine. One could arguably summarise these developmental trends as being amphibious and expeditionary, respectively. Comparing these different courses of development is best accomplished by determining and analysing the similarly divergent evolutionary debates and changes that occurred within each subject country, specifically during the peacetime years when the most significant advances in concepts, tactics, techniques, and doctrine were made. Whilst these activities were particularly divisive in the late 1940s and 1950s (and even in the early 1960s), it was not until the mid-l960s that compromises were reached on both sides of the Atlantic, which made a convergence of amphibious/expeditionary warfare development apparent; but even this did not completely eliminate certain underlying national differences
9
Prieto, Iommi Juan Pablo. "Romana arma non ante visa : las guerras romanas en el oriente helenistico : desde las expediciones ilirias hasta la hegemonia militar (229-194 a.C.)." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Bordeaux 3, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023BOR30038.
La présente recherche porte sur les conflits militaires romains dans le monde hellénistique, plus spécifiquement ceux survenus entre 229 et 194 avant J.-C., connus sous le nom des deux premières guerres illyriennes et des deux premières guerres de Macédoine. L'objectif de ce travail à consisté à répondre à une question plus complexe qu’il n’y paraît : réexaminer plus précisément le sens historique de ces affrontements afin de mieux comprendre l'expansionnisme de la République romaine au tournant des IIIe et IIe siècles avant J.-C. Grâce à une aproche à la fois théorique, méthodologique et historiographique, il a été possible de mettre en évidence le fait que cette période des trente-cinq premières années des guerres romaines en Orient constitue un moment crucial pour repenser la nature et la dynamique de l'expansion militaire romaine dans cette partie du monde méditerranéen. Cette étude formule ainsi l’hypothèse que ces guerres romaines en Grèce se sont définie et développée sur la base d'objectifs militaires stricts et circonscrits, avant d’évoluer tardivement, seulement à partir de la fin de l’année 198 avant J.-C., vers une dimension impérialiste, mais encore naissante et décousue: depuis la guerre de type expéditionnaire en Illyrie jusqu'à la guerre de coalition en Grèce sous Flamininus This research delves into Roman military conflicts in the Hellenistic world, specifically those occurring between 229 and 194 BCE, known as the first two Illyrian Wars and the first two Macedonian Wars. primary objective of this study is to address a more nuanced question than initially apparent: to meticulously reassess the historical significance of these conflicts for a better comprehension of the Roman Republic's expansionism during the transition from the 3rd to the 2nd centuries BCE. Employing a theoretical, methodological, and historiographical critical approach, the research effectively highlights that the initial thirty-five years of Roman wars in the East represent a pivotal period demanding a reevaluation of the nature and dynamics of Roman military expansion in this segment of the Mediterranean world. The study posits the hypothesis that these Roman wars in Greece were initially defined and developed based on precise and delimited military objectives. However, they later evolved, starting only from the conclusion of the year 198 BCE, into an incipient and fragmented imperialistic dimension — progressing from expeditionary warfare in Illyria to the coalition war in Greece under Flamininus
10
Searle, Deane. "Low Intensity Conflict: Contemporary Approaches and Strategic Thinking." The University of Waikato, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10289/2591.
Low Intensity Conflict (LIC) is a significant feature of the contemporary world and it is a particular challenge to the armed forces of many states which are involved is such conflict, or are likely to become so. This thesis is not concerned with how such difficult conflict situations arise. Rather it is concerned with how, from the point of view of the state, they may be contained and ultimately brought to a satisfactory resolution. The work is thus concerned with the practicalities of ending LIC. More specifically, the purpose of this research is to establish a framework of doctrinal and military principles applicable to the prevention and resolution of LIC. The principles of this thesis are based in numerous historical examples of LIC and six in depth case studies. These distilled principles are analysed in two central chapters, and are then applied in two latter defence force chapters so as to ensure there practicality and resilience. Numerous defence academics and military practitioners have been consulted in the production of this thesis; their contribution has further reinforced the functionality of the principles examined in this research. The research illustrates the criticality of a holistic approach to LIC. The function of this approach is to guarantee the stability of the sovereign state, by unifying civil, police, intelligence and military services. The effectiveness of the military elements must also be ensured, as military force is central to the suppression of LIC. Consequently, the research makes strategic and operational prescriptions, so as to improve the capability of defence forces that are concerned with preventing or resolving LIC.
Книги з теми "Expeditionary warfare":
1
United States. Office of Naval Intelligence and United States. Marine Corps Intelligence Activity, eds. Challenges to naval expeditionary warfare. [Washington, D.C.?]: The Office, 1997.
United States. Office of Naval Intelligence. and United States. Marine Corps Intelligence Activity., eds. Challenges to naval expeditionary warfare. [Washington, D.C.?]: The Office, 1997.
R, Mortensen Daniel, Air University (U.S.). College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education., and Air University (U.S.). Airpower Research Institute., eds. The air expeditionary force in perspective. Maxwell AFB, Ala: Airpower Research Institute, College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, Air University, 2003.
Elleman, Bruce A., and S. C. M. Paine. Naval power and expeditionary wars: Peripheral campaigns and new theatres of naval warfare. London: Routledge, 2011.
Ferguson, Michael P., and Ian Worthington. "The Trials and Tolls of Expeditionary Warfare." In The Military Legacy of Alexander the Great, 231–59. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003052951-17.
Strauss, Lon, and Njord Wegge. "The strategic challenge of expeditionary warfare and the defense of NATO's northern flank." In Defending NATO’s Northern Flank, 15–31. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003343905-3.
Osica, Olaf. "Transformation through Expeditionary Warfare:." In A Transformation Gap?, 167–86. Stanford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvqsdqcw.12.
van Fenema, Paul C. "Expeditionary military networks and asymmetric warfare." In Advances in Military Sociology: Essays in Honor of Charles C. Moskos, 267–83. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/s1572-8323(2009)000012a020.
"1 British Expeditionary Warfare, 1793–1815." In British Expeditionary Warfare and the Defeat of Napoleon, 1793-1815, 9–39. Boydell and Brewer, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781782043188-009.
Schmitt, Olivier, and Elie Tenenbaum. "Caught between a Rock and a Hard Place." In Advanced Land Warfare, 353–72. Oxford University PressOxford, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192857422.003.0017.
Abstract The army has been at the centre of the transformation of the French armed forces since the end of the Cold War. The key organizational challenge for the French Army has been to integrate and digest the consequences of professionalization, adopting a ‘joint’ information technology architecture and defining its own distinct service footprint in the shape of an expeditionary warfighting capacity. After three decades of expeditionary warfare, the French Army is once again evolving and pivoting toward high-intensity warfare, a new organizational challenge impacting doctrine, procurement, training, and the relationship with key allies. The new strategic environment—rendered even more obvious by the war in Ukraine—is already apparent in evolving tactics, doctrine, and capability development. This transformation, however, will take time as it challenges both the operational experience and the cultural heritage of a French Army that finds itself, more than ever, at the crossroads for defining its future role in the strategic landscape.
7
"Far-distant aggression: Anglo-French expeditionary warfare." In War, Strategy and the Modern State, 1792–1914, 64–106. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315391380-10.
"The early Tang military and the expeditionary armies." In Medieval Chinese Warfare 300-900, 193–214. Routledge, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203206683-12.
"The Organisation and Support of an Expeditionary Force: Manpower and Logistics in the Middle Byzantine Period." In Byzantine Warfare, 437–78. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315261003-32.
Osica, Olaf. "Transformation through Expeditionary Warfare: Military Change in Poland." In A Transformation Gap?, 167–86. Stanford University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.11126/stanford/9780804763776.003.0008.
Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Expeditionary warfare":
1
Southby-Tailyour, E. "The United Kingdom's Littoral Warfare Capabilities." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.02.
Fuller, G. H. "Over the Beach and into the HinterLand." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.22.
Bricknell, D. J., and P. E. Vedlog. "The Intra-Theatre Logistics Ship." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.16.
Bailey, A., and C. Ross. "Pacscat - A New Generation of Landing Craft For The Littoral Environment." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.13.
Tudem, U., A. Eilertsen, and J. G. Eide. "Design Development of Advanced Air Supported Vessel (ASV) Designs." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.15.
Manley, D. "Warship Vulnerability Reduction and The Littoral Environment." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.09.
Hawkins, M. J. "Bay Class LSD(A) Ships for UK Royal Fleet Auxillary." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.20.
Martin, A. A., and L. C. Thomson. "Designing To Survive In The Littoral Environment." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.08.
Nisbet, C., I. Leach, M. Robb, and O. Sudlow. "The Future Evolution of Warship Design - The Demands of Joint Operations In The Littoral Battlespace." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.03.
Bass, D., D. Molyneux, and K. McTaggart. "Simulating Wave Action In The Well Deck of Landing Platform Dock Ships Using Computational Fluid Dynamics." In Warship 2004: Littoral Warfare & The Expeditionary Force. RINA, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3940/rina.ws.2004.12.
Higgins, Eric J., Ronald Leroy Higgs, Gregory R. Parkins, Vincent S. Tionquiao, and Christopher Kevin Wells. Expeditionary Warfare- Force Protection. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada423483.
OFFICE OF NAVAL INTELLIGENCE WASHINGTONDC. Challenges to Naval Expeditionary Warfare. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada338556.
Quinn, II, and John I. The Expeditionary Warfare Group of 2013. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada514809.
NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER DAHLGREN DIV VA. Naval Surface Warfare Center Dahlgren Division, Technical Digest; Expeditionary Warfare. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada332964.
Pearcy, Richard E. The Information Warfare Threat to Air Expeditionary Forces. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, February 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada378513.
Dorman, Andrew. European Adaptation to Expeditionary Warfare: Implications for the U.S. Army. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, November 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada408783.
Kurdys, Martin P. Information Warfare (IW) Command and Control Warfare (C2W) for the Naval Expeditionary Task Force Commander. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada312051.
Nicholson, Denise, Sae Schatz, Kay Stanney, and S. Lackey. Next-generation Expeditionary Warfare Intelligent Training (NEW-IT) Program Summary Booklet. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, October 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada514853.
Weinstein, Cliff J. Sink or Swim: The Marine Corps Capacity to Conduct a Marine Expeditionary Brigade Amphibious Assault using Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada526180.
Jones, David W., Max H. Miller, James A. Ballas, and Janet I. Olsonbaker. Analysis of Human-Computer Interaction in the Expeditionary Warfare Decision Support System (EDSS). Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada427048.
