Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Evidence-based midwifery"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Evidence-based midwifery".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Evidence-based midwifery"
Kutálková, Karolína, and Věra Vránová. "THE MIDWIVES` AWARENESS OF EVIDENCE BASED MIDWIFERY." Profese online 7, no. 2 (October 1, 2014): 7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5507/pol.2014.008.
Повний текст джерела., Mrudhula, and Maheswari B. "Evidence Based Practice in Midwifery: Moving Towards Destiny." Indian Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 4, no. 3 (2016): 275–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijog.2321.1636.4316.14.
Повний текст джерелаRosy, M. Marie. "Evidence based Practice in Midwifery." International Journal of Nursing Education and Research 4, no. 3 (2016): 376. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/2454-2660.2016.00067.3.
Повний текст джерелаRenfrew, Mary. "Midwifery and evidence-based care." Midwifery 12, no. 4 (December 1996): 157–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0266-6138(96)80001-5.
Повний текст джерелаShadap, Arkierupaia. "Evidence based practice in midwifery care." International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecological Nursing 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2022): 01–04. http://dx.doi.org/10.33545/26642298.2022.v4.i1a.75.
Повний текст джерелаGoshomi, Unice. "Evidence-based practice and midwifery practice." African Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health 13, no. 1 (January 2, 2019): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ajmw.2019.13.1.5.
Повний текст джерелаFahy, Kathleen. "Evidence-based midwifery and power/knowledge." Women and Birth 21, no. 1 (March 2008): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2007.12.004.
Повний текст джерелаKennedy, Holly Powell, Eleanor Doig, Barbara Hackley, Mayri Sagady Leslie, and Stephanie Tillman. "“The Midwifery Two-Step”: A Study on Evidence-Based Midwifery Practice." Journal of Midwifery & Women's Health 57, no. 5 (July 27, 2012): 454–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-2011.2012.00174.x.
Повний текст джерелаBelowska, Jarosława, Aleksander Zarzeka, Mariusz Panczyk, and Joanna Gotlib. "Evidence-based midwifery practice – przegląd światowego piśmiennictwa." Pielęgniarstwo Polskie 60, no. 2 (June 30, 2016): 236–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.20883/pielpol.2016.17.
Повний текст джерелаSpiby, Helen, Jane Munro, and Helen Spiby. "Evidence-based midwifery in action: an introduction." British Journal of Midwifery 9, no. 9 (September 2001): 549. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2001.9.9.9419.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Evidence-based midwifery"
De, Leo Annemarie June. "Improving processes for implementing evidence-based practice in midwifery: Development of an eTool(KIT) for midwives." Thesis, Edith Cowan University, Research Online, Perth, Western Australia, 2020. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/2422.
Повний текст джерелаHindley, Carol. "Intrapartum fetal monitoring for woman at low obstetric risk : enabling evidence based midwifery practice." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.499833.
Повний текст джерелаThopola, Magdeline Kefilwe. "An evidence-based model for enhancing optimal midwifery practice environment in maternity units of public hospitals, Limpopo Province." Thesis, University of Limpopo, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1541.
Повний текст джерелаThe purpose of this study was to develop an evidence-based model for enhancing optimal midwifery practice environment in maternity units of public hospitals, Limpopo Province. A mixed method sequential explanatory design was adopted. The study was conducted in four phases, namely: quantitative, qualitative, model development and validation of the model. Self-developed 4-point Likert scale questionnaires consisting of 81 item questions for learner midwives and 89 item questions for midwifery practitioners were administered. The questionnaires were pre-tested prior to being administered to the respondents of the main study. The sample size of midwifery practioners was 174 and that of the learner midwives was 163. Data collected from respondents were analyzed quantitatively using descriptive and inferential statistics. Tables, pie and bar graphs were drawn to present the results. The results from the quantitative phase were utilized to formulate the interview guides that were used to explore the experiences of midwifery practitioners, experiences of learner midwives and perceptions of puerperal mothers. Phenomenological semi-structured individual interviews were conducted for midwifery practitioners (n=20), 3 Focus group discussions of learner midwives (n=18) and 3 focus group discussions of puerperal mothers (n=18) were held until data reached saturation. Data were analyzed qualitatively using Tesch’s open-coding method. Themes and sub-themes were coded manually. Results that emerged from the corroboration, comparison and integration of quantitative and qualitative results revealed the existence a sub-optimal midwifery practice environment, sub-optimal midwifery experiential learning environment and provision of sub-optimal midwifery interventions in the public hospitals of Limpopo province. Development of an evidence-based model emanated from the findings of numeric quantitative data and qualitative narratives. The evidence-based information from the existing situation as seen from the world of participants brought about a gap of optimal midwifery practice environment. The ideal situation was designed in a way of addressing the gaps identified. Experts were given the validation tool to assess whether the model was clear, simple, understood and that it can be utilized by any discipline in future.
Santos, Rafael Cleison Silva dos. "Implementação de evidências científicas na prevenção e reparo do trauma perineal no parto." Universidade de São Paulo, 2016. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/7/7141/tde-19052017-100401/.
Повний текст джерелаIntroduction: Episiotomy rates and spontaneous perineal trauma in normal birth have considerable variation among different health care services. These perineal traumas and related morbidity may be prevented or restricted adopting evidence-based practices during childbirth and perineal repair. Although the well established evidence on perineal trauma prevention and repair, in Brazil there are few studies on the implementation of this evidence in practice. Objectives: Promote the best evidence-based practices for perineal trauma prevention and repair in normal birth; Assess the current practice in perineal trauma prevention and repair in normal birth; Implement the best evidence-based practices on perineal trauma prevention and repair in normal birth; Assess the impact of these implementation on maternal outcomes. Methods: Quasi-experimental intervention study before and after, according to Institute Joanna Briggs methodology implementation of evidence in clinical practice. It was conducted 74 interviews with nurses, obstetricians, residents of both categories and 70 with post-partum women who have had birth at Hospital da Mulher Mãe Luzia, in Macapá, AP, Brazil. It was also analyzed 555 patient data records. The educational intervention was a seminar for professionals, to present and discuss the best evidence-based practice available in relation to perineal care during labour and birth. The study was conducted in three stages: pre-audit and base audit (phase 1); implementation of best practices (phase 2: educational intervention); post-implementation audit (phase 3). Data were analysed comparing the results of phases 1 and 3, with significance level of 5%. The Research Ethics Committee of the School of Nursing of the University of São Paulo approved the study. Results: Concerning professionals, the comparison between phases 1 and 3 showed an increased proportion of professionals who rarely or never encourage direct pushing (55.0% versus 81.2%; p=0.009), perform episiotomy (83.3% versus 96.9%; p=0.021) and leave first-degree lacerations without repairing (61.9% versus 81.3%; p=0.011). Concerning post-partum women, besides the lithotomy position have been most frequent referred by women in the phase 1 (77.1%), it was also the most frequent position in phase 3 (97.1%), with statistical difference (p=0.028). Related to perineal pain 1-2 days, 10-12 days and 30 days after childbirth, the frequency decreased (94.0%, 66.7% and 63.6%, respectively, in each period, in phase 1, and 79.0%, 57.1% and 38.5%, respectively, in each period in phase 3), with statistical difference considering all periods (p=0.019), but no difference between phases 1 and 3. Concerning patient data records, less women had perineal lacerations sutured (92.0%, in phase 1, and 82.1%, in phase 3; p=0.039) and more women had perineal mucosa (4.8%, in phase 1, and 28.1%, in phase 3; p=0.006) and perineal skin (10.2%, in phase 1, and 25.0%, in phase 3; p=0.033) sutured by polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910. Concerning other analyzed practices and outcomes, no one had statistical significant difference before and after the educational intervention. Conclusion: The evidence-based practice implementation methodology improved the childbirth care and perineal outcomes, such as less nurses and obstetricians performing directed pushes and routine episiotomies, and more records about the use of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 to suture perineal mucosa and skin. On the other hand, it was identified gaps in evidence implementation and some inappropriate perineal care management, such as women submitted to lithotomy position during birth and lack of records in suturing perineal tears. On-going audits and educational interventions on evidence-based practice can improve the childbirth care and maternal outcomes.
Mathole, Thubelihle. "Whose Knowledge Counts? : A Study of Providers and Users of Antenatal Care in Rural Zimbabwe." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala : Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-6251.
Повний текст джерела(12552852), Sharon Haste. "The perceived barriers to implementing a midwifery model of care in a tertiary hospital." Thesis, 2005. https://figshare.com/articles/thesis/The_perceived_barriers_to_implementing_a_midwifery_model_of_care_in_a_tertiary_hospital/19776244.
Повний текст джерелаThis report aims to identify the barriers to implementing a midwifery model of care in the Royal Darwin Hospital. A Government directive was the catalyst to implement the model, however this precedes along history of consumer complaint and government review (Northern Territory Government Media Release, October 2002).
The official project spans over a period of fourteen months with an immediate preceding history of nineteen months relating to other government directives. The directives affecting the project were to develop and implement a caseload midwifery model of care and to plan a birth centre (Northern Territory Government Media Release October, 2002).
Meddings, Fiona S., Phipps Fiona E. MacVane, Melanie Haith-Cooper, and Jacquelyn Haigh. "Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC): exploring women's perceptions." 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10454/6691.
Повний текст джерелаAims and objectives. This study was designed to complement local audit data by examining the lived experience of women who elected to attempt a vaginal birth following a previous caesarean delivery. The study sought to determine whether or not women were able to exercise informed choice and to explore how they made decisions about the method of delivery and how they interpreted their experiences following the birth. Background. The rising operative birth rate in the UK concerns both obstetricians and midwives. Although the popular press has characterized birth by caesarean section as the socialites’ choice, in reality, maternal choice is only one factor in determining the method of birth. However, in considering the next delivery following a caesarean section, maternal choice may be a significant indicator. While accepted current UK practice favours vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) in line with the research evidence indicating reduced maternal morbidity, lower costs and satisfactory neonatal outcomes, Lavender et al. point out that partnership in choice has emerged as a key factor in the decision-making process over the past few decades. Chaung and Jenders explored the issue of choice in an earlier study and concluded that the best method of subsequent delivery, following a caesarean birth, is dependent on a woman's preference. Design and methodology. Using a phenomenological approach enabled a holistic exploration of women's lived experiences of vaginal birth after the caesarean section. Results. This was a qualitative study and, as such, the findings are not transferable to women in general. However, the results confirmed the importance of informed choice and raised some interesting issues meriting the further exploration. Conclusions. Informed choice is the key to effective women-centred care. Women must have access to non-biased evidence-based information in order to engage in a collaborative partnership of equals with midwives and obstetricians. Relevance to clinical practice. This study is relevant to clinical practice as it highlights the importance of informed choice and reminds practitioners that, for women, psycho-social implications may supersede their physical concerns about birth.
Книги з теми "Evidence-based midwifery"
1952-, Munro Jane, ed. Evidence based midwifery: Applications in context. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
Знайти повний текст джерелаBest practices in midwifery: Using the evidence to implement change. New York: Springer, 2013.
Знайти повний текст джерелаResearch methods in nursing & midwifery: Pathways to evidence-based practice. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMcDaid, Catriona Maria. Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based nursing midwifery and health visiting: Barriers, resources and practical implications. [Belfast]: The National Board for Nursing, Midwifery and Health Visiting for Northern Ireland, 2000.
Знайти повний текст джерелаExamination of the newborn: An evidence based guide. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
Знайти повний текст джерелаEvidence-based care for breastfeeding mothers: A resource for midwives and allied healthcare professionals. London: Routledge, 2012.
Знайти повний текст джерелаAlan, Pearson. Evidence-based clinical practice in nursing and healthcare: Assimilating research, experience, and expertise. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Pub., 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаRPN, Field John, and Jordan Zoe, eds. Evidence-based clinical practice in nursing and health care: Assimilating research, experience and expertise. Oxford: Blackwell Pub., 2007.
Знайти повний текст джерела1996, Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust Obstetrics and Gynaecology Directorate Midwife-led Care Working Party. Evidence-based guidelines: Intrapartum midwife-led care for midwives. Leicester: Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, 1996.
Знайти повний текст джерелаLeicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust. Obstetrics and Gynaecology Directorate. Handbook of evidence-based guidelines for midwife-led care in labour. Leicester: Leicester Royal Infirmary NHS Trust, 1996.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Evidence-based midwifery"
Pollard, Maria. "Nursing and Midwifery Council Essential Skills Clusters (ESCs) for Pre-registration Midwifery Education (2007)." In Evidence-based Care for Breastfeeding Mothers, 228. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315625102-14.
Повний текст джерелаBrayford, Donna, Ruth Chambers, Elizabeth Boath, and David Rogers. "Introduction Clinical effectiveness and clinical governance are about knowing what you should be doing and being able to put that knowledge into midwifery practice." In Evidence-Based Care for Midwives, 1–17. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429272158-1.
Повний текст джерелаIrvine, Lucy C. "Selling Beautiful Births: The Use of Evidence by Brazil’s Humanised Birth Movement." In Global Maternal and Child Health, 199–219. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84514-8_11.
Повний текст джерела"Evidence-Based Paradigms and Contemporary Midwifery." In Evidence-Based Healthcare in Context, 169–90. Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315255774-19.
Повний текст джерела"Evidence- based education in nursing and midwifery." In Evidence-Based Education in the Health Professions, 448–60. CRC Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b20752-42.
Повний текст джерелаAughinbaugh, Laura A., and Nicole S. Carlson. "Evidence-Based Midwifery Care for Obese Childbearing Women." In Best Practices in Midwifery. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826131799.0006.
Повний текст джерела"Evidence-based practice." In How to Survive your Nursing or Midwifery Course: A Toolkit for Success, 91–106. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781529714739.n5.
Повний текст джерелаMarowitz, Amy. "Evidence-Based Management of Prelabor Rupture of the Membranes at Term." In Best Practices in Midwifery. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/9780826131799.0021.
Повний текст джерела"Twiggs, op. cit. 28 Freud, S. (1917) Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974, p.496 29 Rogers, C. (1987) Reflection of feelings and transference. In H. Kirschenbaum & V.L. Henderson (eds) The Carl Rogers Reader, London: Constable, 1990, p.134 30 Twiggs, op. cit. 31 Haule, J. The Love Cure, Therapy Erotic and Sexual, Dallas: Spring, 1996, p.55 32 Schwartz-Salant, S. The Mystery of Human Relationships: Alchemy and the Transformation of Self, London: Routledge, 1998, p.2 33 Ibid., p.112 34 Donleavy, P. Analysis and Erotic Energies in The Interactive Field In Analysis, Illinois: Chiron, 1995, p.110 35 Casement, P. On Learning from the Patient, London: Routledge, 1985 36 Laing, R.D. The Facts of Life, op. cit., p.110 37 Jacoby, op. cit., p.109 38 Ussher, J. Women's madness: a material discursive intrapsychic approach. In D. Fee (ed) Pathology and Postmodernism, London: Sage, 2000, p.218 39 Parker, op. cit., p.36 40 Bruna-Seu, op. cit., p.206 41 Hollway, W. Gender difference and the production of subjectivity. In J. Henriques, W. Hollway, C. Urwin, C. Venn, V. Walkerdine (eds) Changing the subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity, London: Routledge, 1984 42 Harper, D.J. Discourse analysis and 'mental health'. Journal of Mental Health,1995, 4, 347-357 43 Billig, op. cit. 44 Bordieu, P. Pascalian Meditations, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000 45 Phillips, R. The need for research-based midwifery practice. British Journal of Midwifery, 1994, 2, 7, 335-8 46 Goodband, S. Research is the new nursing ritual. Nursing Times, 2001, 97, 25, p.21." In Deconstructing Evidence-Based Practice, 154. Routledge, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203422311-25.
Повний текст джерелаLeufer, Thérèse, and Joanne Cleary-Holdforth. "Using Evidence for Decision Making." In Nursing: Decision-Making Skills for Practice. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199641420.003.0010.
Повний текст джерела