Готові списки джерел за темами / Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings

Зміст

Статті в журналах
Дисертації
Книги
Частини книг
Звіти організацій

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 11 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings"

Meisels, Tamar. "Targeted killing with drones? Old arguments, new technologies." Filozofija i drustvo 29, no. 1 (2018): 3–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid1801003m.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The question of how to contend with terrorism in keeping with our preexisting moral and legal commitments now challenges Europe as well as Israel and the United States: how do we apply Just War Theory and International Law to asymmetrical warfare, specifically to our counter terrorism measures? What can the classic moral argument in Just and Unjust Wars teach us about contemporary targeted killings with drones? I begin with a defense of targeted killing, arguing for the advantages of pin pointed attacks over any alternative measure available for combatting terrorism. Assuming the legitimacy of killing combatants in wartime, I argue, there is nothing wrong, and in fact much that is right, with targeting particular terrorists selected by name, as long as their assassinations can be reasonably expected to reduce terrorist hostilities rather than increase it. Subsequently, I offer some further thoughts and comments on the use of remotely piloted aircrafts to carry out targeted killings, and address the various sources for discomfort with this practice identified by Michael Walzer and others.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Romaniuk, Scott Nicholas, and Stewart Tristan Webb. "Extraordinary Measures: Drone Warfare, Securitization, and the “War on Terror”." Slovak Journal of Political Sciences 15, no. 3 (July 1, 2015): 221–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sjps-2015-0012.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract The use of unmanned aerial vehicles or “drones,” as part of the United States’ (US) targeted killing (TK) program dramatically increased after the War on Terror (WoT) was declared. With the ambiguous nature and parameters of the WoT, and stemming from the postulation of numerous low-level, niche-, and other securitizations producing a monolithic threat, US drone operations now constitute a vital stitch in the extensive fabric of US counterterrorism policy. This article employs the theories of securitization and macrosecuritization as discussed by Buzan (1991, 2006), and Buzan and Wæver (2009) to understand targeted killing, by means of weaponized drones, as an extraordinary measure according to the Copenhagen School’s interpretation. An overarching securitization and the use of the “security” label warrants the emergency action of targeted killing through the use of drones as an extraordinary measure. We argue that the WoT serves as a means of securitizing global terrorism as a threat significant enough to warrant the use of drone warfare as an extraordinary use of force. By accepting the WoT as a securitization process we can reasonably accept that the US’ response(s) against that threat are also securitized and therefore become extraordinary measures.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Kashnikov, Boris N. "Humanitarian Terrorism as a Higher and Last Stage of Asymmetric War." Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 63, no. 1 (May 27, 2020): 66–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2020-63-1-66-84.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The articles reviews the problem of humanitarian terrorism that is a terrorism of self-proclaimed humanitarian goals and self-inflicted constraints. This type of terrorism justifies itself by lofty aspirations and claims that its actions are targeted killings of guilty individuals only. This terrorism is the product of the Enlightenment, it emerged by the end of the 18th century and passed three stages in its development. The first stage is the classical terror of the Jacobins 1793–1794. The second one is Russian revolutionary terror of the end of the 19th – early 20th centuries. The third stage is the contemporary American warfare waged by the unmanned aerial vehicles, called drones. From the perspective of the contemporary just war theory, this terrorism is not only morally superior to the ordinary primitive terrorism of straightforward attacks on civilians (this terrorism may be no less fair in terms of self-imposed goals, but is doubtful in terms of means), but even contemporary war. Terrorists of this type kill the few but teach a lesson to many. But it must be clearly born in mind that humanitarian terrorism is not only the summit of just war but also the summit of absolute war. It is founded in personal and individual enmity, which makes the core of absolute enmity. Absolute enmity may at times be inevitable and even justified, but it blocks the road to peace. Revengeful spite, stemming from absolute enmity, is capable of creating its own phantoms of justice, propelling the war. The author concludes that the vicious circle is thus completed. The logic of just war drags in the direction humanitarian terrorism, humanitarian terrorism drags in the mire of absolute enmity. Absolute enmity proclaims just war.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Coombes, Karinne. "Balancing Necessity and Individual Rights in the Fight Against Transnational Terrorism: “Targeted Killings” and International Law." Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 27, no. 2 (October 1, 2009): 285. http://dx.doi.org/10.22329/wyaj.v27i2.4529.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article explores the restraints international human rights law and international humanitarian law place on a State’s use of lethal force against suspected terrorists. Although the law restricts the ability to target suspected terrorists, it is argued that these limits should be respected in order to protect innocent civilians from undue harm. Under IHRL, it is argued that the right to life as a peremptory norm restricts extra-territorial targeted attacks of suspected terrorists. Accordingly, such action should only be considered lawful when it is necessary to protect the State’s population from a known threat and lesser force would not suffice. Under IHL, it is argued that there is no third category of “unprivileged” or “unlawful” combatants who are subject to lawful targeting for the duration of the hostilities; rather, non-State actors who participate in an armed conflict may be lawfully targeted for the duration of their participation, including an ongoing chain of hostile acts.Cet article explore les contraintes qu’imposent les lois internationales sur les droits de la personne ainsi que le droit international humanitaire à l’utilisation de force létale par un État contre des personnes soupçonnées de terrorisme. Quoique la loi limite l’habileté de cibler des personnes soupçonnées de terrorisme, on soutient que ces limites devraient être respectées afin de protéger les civils innocents contre des préjudices injustifiés. En rapport avec les LIDP, on soutient que le droit à la vie comme norme péremptoire limite les attaques extra-territoriales ciblées contre des personnes soupçonnées de terrorisme. Conséquemment, on ne devrait considérer de telles actions comme légitimes que si elles sont nécessaires pour protéger la population de l’État contre une menace connue et qu’une force moindre ne suffirait pas. En rapport avec le DIH, on soutient qu’il n’existe pas de troisième catégorie de combattants «non privilégiés» ou «illégitimes» que l’on peut cibler légitimement pendant la durée des hostilités; plutôt, les acteurs non étatiques qui participent à un conflit armé peuvent être ciblés légitimement pendant la durée de leur participation, y compris une série d’actes hostiles en cours.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

KELAM, IVICA, and TOMISLAV NEDIĆ. "THE LEGAL AND ETHICAL ASPECTS OF THE USE OF LETHAL AUTONOMOUS WEAPON SYSTEMS IN WARFARE." Arhe 18, no. 36 (January 27, 2022): 323–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.19090/arhe.2021.36.323-352.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The development of new technologies has always found its first application in warfare, from the invention of the bow and arrow, through the discovery of gunpowder, to the use of unmanned aerial vehicles in the “War on Terror.” The “successful” use of drones in the targeted killings of “terrorists” gave additional impetus to the development of new types of autonomous weapons that completely replace soldiers of blood and flesh on the battlefield. Currently, there is significant controversy over fully autonomous weapons that are fully autonomous in carrying out military operations. They can autonomously decide on the use of deadly force against “enemy” human beings. This kind of autonomy causes numerous controversies, not only legal but also ethical. Moreover, it calls into question the very essence of man, i.e., whether the “killer robot” is the next evolutionary stage in the development of the human species or a technological return to barbarism. This paper will analyze some of the above legal and ethical dilemmas that await us in the near future.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

NDUMBARO, DAMAS DANIEL. "Targeted Killings." International Journal for Innovation Education and Research 4, no. 10 (October 31, 2016): 229–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol4.iss10.612.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Though International Criminal Law evolves, its evolution needs a careful, considered and consensus among its members through either customs, treaty or other recognized source of international law. The emergence of targeted killings is not clear whether it is a legally accepted counter terrorism policy or a form of extra-judicial killing, thus leaving the jurists undecided; either to criminalize or embrace it as a defence in international criminal law. In a bid to protect national security, many governments have intensified the efforts to counter the terrorists’ threats and attacks. Resorting to employing target killings is one of such attempts of counterterrorism that has created a sharp divide between those who support and those who oppose targeted killings by contending that it is resplendent with numerous human rights abuses. This paper discusses the extent to which targeted killing has been applied in the contemporary society, the arguments for and against, as well as its legality and legitimacy under international law.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Werner, Wouter G. "Drones, Targeted Killings and the Politics of Law." Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 44, no. 2 (June 2015): 95–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5553/njlp/221307132015044009001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Nadhifa, Nisrina, and Anak Agung Banyu Perwita. "THE US STRATEGY OF ARMED DRONE USAGE IN FIGHTING THE TALIBAN ELEMENTS IN PAKISTAN (2004-2016)." Jurnal Pertahanan 5, no. 2 (August 2, 2019): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.33172/jp.v5i2.504.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

<p>Prior to the Trump’s presidency the US have performed as many as 400 armed drone strikes in Pakistan, killing approximately 3.000 terrorist targets including key leaders that hold important value to the organizations. More than a decade these attacks were performed, yet we have not seen the end of the terrorist and insurgent’s presence in Pakistan. This leads into a thought whether the attacks were effective or not. Therefore, this study aims to analyze, predominantly evaluating the use of the targeted killing strategy in this US counterterrorism effort. The study uses qualitative research method by using Robert A. Pape’s perspective in strategic effectiveness and David Galula’s counterinsurgency perspective. Those perspectives pointed out the cause of this situation is due to the inability of the attacked target set to trigger the destruction of the movement, the inability of the US to secure the ends, ways, and means of the operation which involve the dissociation between the population and the insurgents, their ability to forge proper cooperation with its local ally, and the un-favoring view of the local population toward its targeted killings practice has resulted in the infectivity of the strategy and a prolonged fight between the US and its opponent. In sum, it can be inferred that despite capable of eliminating numerous high-value targets the targeted killing strategy is deemed ineffective due to its inability to procure full destruction of its opponent and due to the inability of the US to secure the ends, ways, and means of the operation which would have increase the success of the strategy.</p>

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Gruenewald, Jeff. "Do Targeted Killings Increase or Decrease Terrorism?" Criminology & Public Policy 16, no. 1 (February 2017): 187–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12275.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Crum, John David. "Book Review: Drones and the ethics of targeted killings." Criminal Justice Review 41, no. 4 (July 27, 2016): 522–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734016816634432.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings"

Örming, Lovisa. "Drönarattackers effekt på terrorism : fallet Pakistan." Thesis, Försvarshögskolan, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-3460.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The United States use of Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles (UCAV) or drones for targeted killings of terrorists has been on the rise in recent years and the method has become the core element of president Obamas strategy in the war against terror. This study examines the deterrent effect of targeted killings on terrorism using UCAV/drones as a method of counterterrorism. Building on the literature on counterterrorism, UCAV, targeted killings, deterrence theory and statistics on terrorism the study provides a case study of the CIA drone operations in Pakistan between the years 2004-2010. The goal has been to analyze drone operations and the extent of terrorism from the beginning of the drone campaign until 2010. This as a means of identifying possible trends in terrorism activity due to the occurrence of drone strikes. Findings suggest that the possibility of a deterrent effect is far from evident and that there are some indications of increased terrorism.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Haenflein, Rebecca. "The Cubicle Warrior : Drones, Targeted Killings, and the Implications of Waging a "War on Terror" from a Distance Under International Law." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-265085.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Lundquist, Joel. "Killing Terrorists - Armed Drones and the Ethics of War." Thesis, Malmö högskola, Fakulteten för kultur och samhälle (KS), 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-22322.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The aim of this thesis is to answer the question whether the U.S. policy on targeted killings with combat drones is compatible with the legal doctrine of just war theory, applicable international law, and human rights law. Moreover, this paper intends to examine the legal issues arising from the U.S. practice of international law in relation to the justification of targeted killings. The purpose of this thesis is to determine whether the practice of targeted killings can be considered lawful and, if not, to provide knowledge about how the method violates applicable international law and the ethics of war. The focus is placed on relevant treaties and customary international law, and just war theory is used as a theoretical complement to explain the meaning and purpose of selected laws in order to determine their applicability to the research problem. Furthermore, this procedure has been conducted by using a legal method to identify the legal problem and interpret relevant sources of law in order to determine their applicability to the research problem. The thesis has determined that the U.S. policy on targeted killings with combat drones is not consistent with applicable international law and fundamental human rights law. In particular, the practice of targeted killings violates the principle of distinction.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Chengeta, Thompson. "Are U.S drone targeted killings within the confines of the law?" Diss., University of Pretoria, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/18610.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Equally discomforting is the PlayStation mentality that surrounds drone killings. Young military personnel raised on a diet of video games now kill real people remotely using joysticks. Far removed from the human consequences of their actions, how will this generation of fighters value the right to life? How will commanders and policy makers keep themselves immune from the deceptively antiseptic nature of drone killings? Will killing be a more attractive option than capture? Will the standards of intelligence gathering justify a killing slip? Will the number of acceptable collateral civilian deaths increase?
Prepared under the supervision of Mr Gus Waschefort at the International criminal court, The Hague, Netherlands
Thesis (LLM (Human Rights and Democratisation in Africa)) -- University of Pretoria, 2011.
http://www.chr.up.ac.za/
nf2012
Centre for Human Rights
LLM

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Mencini, Damian. "From Pulling the Trigger to Pushing the Button: Historical Precedents for Targeted Killings and Signature Strikes." Thesis, Boston College, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:103680.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Thesis advisor: Charles Gallagher
Thesis advisor: Peter Krause
Drone strikes are sensational events. The United States Government uses remotely piloted aircraft (or drones) equipped with precisions weapons systems to unilaterally hunt and kill its enemies across the globe. The American public, and many around the world, are startled by the pervasiveness of American lethal force. In many ways, drone strikes are unprecedented. The technology, the frequency of use, and the geographic scope are all by-products of the twenty-first century. However, the United States government has a deep history of debating whether to kill individual enemies, and has a history of authorizing operations to do so. Beneath the rhetoric, the arguments, and the opinions that dominate drone policy today there is something missing: the history. This thesis argues that there are historical precedents for targeted killings and signature strikes in American history that predate the September 11 terrorist attacks and examining these past operations can inform modern policy
Thesis (BA) — Boston College, 2014
Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: College Honors Program
Discipline: History

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Slabá, Tereza. "Legality of use of drones." Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-205077.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The thesis analyses the legality of the use of drones in warfare based on the examination of three specific case studies. Firstly the use of armed drones in Afghanistan 2001 and 2002, then Pakistan drone strikes ongoing since 2004 and lastly the Yemen case study. A developed legal framework is used to assess the legality of the use of drones. Furthermore, it briefly touches upon the aspects of morality and ethics of the use of the unmanned aerial vehicles in combat.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Vasiliauskienė, Violeta. "The fight against terrorism in the context of international humanitarian law." Doctoral thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2014. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2014~D_20140303_135329-20805.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In the last decade the fight against terrorism was carried out not only by measures indicated in national criminal procedure laws or international treaties outlining measures in the fight against terrorism, but also using military forces and carrying out military measures. Thus the dissertation aims to establish when and to what extent is the international humanitarian law (hereinafter – IHL) applied in the fight against terrorism, that is, to analyze in what cases the fight against terrorism amounts to armed conflict, what is the status of terrorists taking part in the armed conflict according to IHL, and to evaluate in the light of IHL principles and rules the specific measures taken against terrorists. Firstly the dissertation analyses the question of the definition of terrorism and proposes a possible definition of this phenomenon. Further on the dissertation analyzes the instances when the IHL rules are applied in the fight against terrorism, that is, when such situation amounts to an armed conflict, and evaluates the main criteria of armed conflict – intensity and organization – and their application in the fight against terrorism. The dissertation also explores the questions of the status of terrorists taking part in an armed conflict, distinguishing those taking part in international and non-international armed conflicts, and exploring the criteria for the direct participation in hostilities for such persons. Finally, the dissertation analyzes the specific measure of... [to full text]
Pastaraisiais dešimtmečiais kovą su terorizmu pradėta vykdyti ne tik pasitelkiant nacionaliniuose baudžiamojo proceso įstatymuose ar tarptautinėse sutartyse, skirtose kovai su terorizmu, numatytas priemones, tačiau ir naudojant karines pajėgas bei atliekant karinius veiksmus. Taigi disertacijoje iškeliamas tikslas nustatyti, kada ir kokiu mastu taikoma tarptautinė humanitarinė teisė (toliau – THT) kovoje su terorizmu, tai yra, ištirti, kokiais atvejais kova su terorizmu laikytina ginkluotu konfliktu, koks yra teroristų, dalyvaujančių ginkluotame konflikte, statusas pagal THT ir atsižvelgiant į THT normas įvertinti specifines kovos priemones, naudojamas kovojant su teroristais. Pirmiausiai disertacijoje analizuojamas terorizmo apibrėžimo klausimas ir pateikiamas galimas terorizmo apibrėžimas. Toliau disertacijoje vertinama, kuriais atvejais kovojant su terorizmu bus taikomos THT normos, tai yra, kada kova su terorizmu prilygsta ginkluotam konfliktui, tiriami ginkluoto konflikto intensyvumo ir organizuotumo kriterijai ir jų taikymas kovos su terorizmu situacijose. Disertacijoje taip pat tiriama, koks yra teroristų, dalyvaujančių ginkluotame konflikte, statusas pagal THT, išskiriant tarptautiniuose ir netarptautiniuose ginkluotuose konfliktuose dalyvaujančius asmenis, taip pat išsamiai išanalizuojant asmenų tiesioginio dalyvavimo ginkluotame konflikte kriterijus. Galiausiai disertacijoje tiriama specifinė kovos su terorizmu priemonė – tikslinių nužudymų, ypač naudojant... [toliau žr. visą tekstą]

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Stier, Luisa. "Leadership in times of terrorism threat : An Analysis of George W. Bush’s and Barack Obama’s leadership qualities concerning counterterrorism." Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST), 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-95602.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

While the US-presidency comprises the most powerful office of leadership in the world and has also been investigated at various angles in personal, biographical approaches as well as comparative studies, this research paper specifically lays focus and compares the two presidencies of President Bush and President Obama in regard of their leadership qualities and counter-terrorism strategies. Because counterterrorism seems to be a good example of how presidents perform crises-management and because the subject by itself is critical in the perspective of human rights and security concerns, the research paper has chosen to focus on President Bush and President Obama who are known to have chosen different routes and strategies in countering terrorism. However, when comparing the two presidents’ leadership qualities regarding their counter-terrorism strategies, this paper concludes that on this matter the strategies of the two presidents were not quite so different as expected and a possible path of continuity runs through this realm of US-foreign affairs and presidents’ leadership decisions.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Férey, Amélie. "Les politiques d’assassinats ciblés en Israël et aux Etats-Unis : juger de la légitimité de la violence étatique en démocratie libérale." Thesis, Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018IEPP0002.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Les assassinats ciblés désignent l’utilisation étatique de la force létale avec l’intention préméditée et délibérée de tuer individuellement les personnes sélectionnées se trouvant en dehors des frontières nationales. Sont-ils légitimes au regard de notre compréhension des règles démocratiques et libérales ? Pour répondre à cette question, cette thèse de doctorat dresse une comparaison entre les pratique israélienne et américaine. Les assassinats ciblés participent d’une discussion sur la légitimité de l’assassinat politique en même temps qu’ils procèdent des évolutions des théories des bombardements et de l’utilisation préventive/préemptive de la force. (Chap. I) La discussion générale sur leur légitimité doit donc être complétée par une étude soulignant les spécificités nationales de ces politiques. (Chap. II) Israël et les États-Unis se sont servis de ces pratiques pour conduire une reformulation partielle du droit international. (Chap. III) L’absence de mécanismes efficaces de contrôle des normes juridiques lors de conflits armés pose problème. Nous évaluons les procédures et institutions existantes et proposons un élargissement du régime de responsabilité des drones proposés par Allan Buchanan et Robert Keohane aux opérations d’assassinats ciblés. (Chap. IV) Leur efficacité tactique ne garantit pas leur pertinence pour une stratégie de long terme contrant le terrorisme. (Chap. V) Leurs conséquences sur la politique étrangère sont-elles bénéfiques ? Nous montrons qu’ils contribuent à renforcer la souveraineté des États faisant la guerre aux « illégitimes ». (Chap. VI) Ceux-ci sont-ils compatibles avec les valeurs morales prônées par les démocraties israéliennes et américaines ? Ils promeuvent une conception libérale de l’action politique légitime en renouvelant les exigences de transparence à l’égard de l’utilisation secrète de la force. (Chap. VII) Ce débat ouvre des pistes pour un aménagement de la raison d’État en démocratie libérale en précisant le contenu théorique d’une moralité d’exception. (Chap. VIII)
The term “targeted killings” is commonly employed to refer to the intentional, premeditated and deliberate use of lethal force by states to kill selected individuals who are not in their custody. My research questions the justifications used to legitimize targeted killings within the liberal-democratic framework. I first give a chronological account of lethal practices pertaining to targeted killings and the context of their emergence. In the literature, targeted killings are discussed in reference to political assassination, theories of bombing in warfare and the use of preventive/preemptive force. (Chapter I) I then explore the national specific features of targeted killings by comparing Israeli with American discussion. (Chapter II) I analyze how targeted killings have been the spearhead of a recasting of legal obligations of Israel and the United States restricting use of force against irregular actors. (Chapter III) I then analyze national and international actual and hypothetical accountability mechanisms. I complete Allan Buchanan and Robert Keohane proposition of a “Drone Accountability Regime” by extending it to targeted killings. (Chapter IV) Their tactical efficiency does not guarantee their relevance for a long-term strategy aiming at countering terrorism. (Chapter V). What are their consequences on the international level? Targeted killings contribute to reinforce sovereignty of States waging war against “unlawful combatants”. (Chapter VI) Are they compatible with the moral values put forward by Israeli and American democracies? Targeted killings promote a new conception of legitimate violence by strengthening transparency demands towards secret use of force. (Chapter VII) This debate opens up avenues for “Raison d’État” in a liberal democracy by specifying the theoretical content of an exceptional morality. (Chapter VIII)

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Kučera, Tomáš. "Cílené likvidace osob jako prostředek boje proti terorismu." Master's thesis, 2012. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-329858.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In recent decades we can watch heated debates on the legal and moral permissibility of State-sponsored targeted killings involving representatives from Governments, academic circles, military and police forces, intelligence services, human rights groups, humanitarian institutions, intergovernmental organizations a and the mass media. These debates are even more intense after the killing of Osama bin Laden, leader of the terrorist group Al Qaeda, in May 2011. The aim of the thesis is to answer to the question: Are targeted killings a permissible method of fight against terrorism? The legality of targeted killings is analyzed in term of lex lata international law, namely under human rights law, international humanitarian law and law of international security. The thesis is composed of six chapters. Chapter One defines basic terminology used in the thesis. The Chapter is subdivided into two parts. Part One defines the concept of targeted killings. Part Two defines the notion of terrorism. Chapter Two examines the legality of targeted killings in term of law of international security. Chapter Three describes the parallel application of human rights law and international humanitarian law. Chapter Four analyzes the legality of targeted killings under human rights law. The Chapter is subdivided into two...

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings"

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Drones and the war on terror: When can the U.S. target alleged American terrorists overseas? : hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, February 27, 2013. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Drones and targeted killings: Ethics, law, politics. New York: International Debate Education Association, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Targeted killings: Law and morality in an asymmetrical world. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Protecting U.S. citizens' constitutional rights during the War on Terror: Hearing before the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred Thirteenth Congress, first session, May 22, 2013. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Klein, Aaron J. Striking back: The 1972 Munich Olympics Massacre and Israel's deadly response. New York, NY: Random House, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Striking back: The 1972 Munich Olympics Massacre and Israel's deadly response. New York: Random House, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Preventive force: Drones, targeted killing, and the transformation of contemporary warfare. New York University Press, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Drones and Targeted Killing in the Middle East and Africa: An Appraisal of American Counterterrorism Policies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Drones and Targeted Killing in the Middle East and Africa: An Appraisal of American Counterterrorism Policies. Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Incorporated, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Drones, surveillance, and targeted killings. 2017.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings"

Finegan, Rory. "Targeted killings." In Routledge Handbook Of Terrorism And Counterterrorism, 471–82. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2018.: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315744636-41.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ganor, Boaz. "Targeted Killings: Ethical & Operational Dilemmas." In Ethics and Terrorism, 133–46. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003222873-11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Meloni, Chantal. "State and Individual Responsibility for Targeted Killings by Drones." In Drones and Responsibility, 47–64. Farnham, Surrey, UK England ; Burlington, VT : Ashgate, 2016. | Series: Emerging technologies, ethics and international affairs: Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315578187-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ganor, Boaz, and Liram Koblentz-Stenzler. "The Legitimacy of Targeted Killings: A Death Penalty Under the Guise of Counter-Terrorism?" In Israel’s Targeted Killing Policy, 85–111. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13674-0_4.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ganor, Boaz, and Liram Koblentz-Stenzler. "Targeted Killings in Israel’s Counter-Terrorism Strategy: Decision-Making Processes and the Intelligence Factor." In Israel’s Targeted Killing Policy, 43–83. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13674-0_3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Scicluna, Nicole. "12. War and law in the twenty-first century." In The Politics of International Law, 267–86. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198791201.003.0012.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter explicates the various ways in which contemporary warfare challenges post-1945 international law on the use of force and the conduct of war. It begins by exploring the rules governing the use of force against non-state actors. This is one of the most pressing issues of the war on terror, much of which has involved military operations against terrorist groups operating from the territory of states that cannot or will not suppress their activities. In particular, campaigns by the US and several other states against ISIS in Syria have seriously undermined the international law framework governing self-defence and the right of states to have their sovereignty and territorial integrity respected. The chapter then looks at another trademark policy of the war on terror: the use of targeted killings, often carried out by unmanned drones, to eliminate suspected terrorists. It also considers a new type of warfare altogether: the emerging phenomenon of cyber warfare, which, too, has implications for both jus ad bellum and jus in bello.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

"Targeted killing and drone warfare." In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, 206–16. New York : Routledge, 2016.: Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315813462-27.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Fuller, Christopher J. "Human Rights Law as an Alternative to Jus in Bello." In Between Crime and War, 315–44. Oxford University PressNew York, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197638798.003.0011.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract This chapter addresses the United Kingdom’s adoption of targeted killing by drone strike as a counterterrorism policy. It compares the domestic costs of America’s application of a war paradigm in its counterterrorism efforts over the past two decades to the United Kingdom’s less disruptive retention of a crime paradigm, before demonstrating the ways in which the British government has gradually adopting aspects of America’s approach, including a reliance upon the laws of war to justify lethal action against terrorist targets abroad. The chapter then challenges this shift toward a war paradigm to defend the UK homeland by urging that Britain retain its recognition of terrorists as criminals not combatants, instead utilizing human rights law, in particular Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, to provide an adequate and less domestically fractious model for the application of lethal force when absolutely necessary against terrorists plotting imminent attacks from foreign safe havens.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Fuller, Christopher J. "‘A New Departure’: Britain’s Lethal Drone Policy and the Range of Justice." In Ethics of Drone Strikes, 93–114. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474483575.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter problematises the assignment of drone violence to the war paradigm, shifting the discussion toward the UK experience. It assesses Prime Minister David Cameron’s 2015 authorisation of the drone-based targeted killing of Reyaad Khan, a British citizen and member of Islamic State. This attack, carried out in Syria, was the first known instance of a British drone being used lethally inside a country where the UK is not involved in a war. Accordingly, Cameron described the strike as ‘a new departure’ for the UK. The chapter provides an ethical assessment of the way in which the British government has remained vague about the purpose of its post-2015 drone policy, the legal basis which underwrites it, the associated decision-making process, and the accountability mechanisms which exist for strikes. It explores the evolution of the UK’s armed drone fleet, ministers’ statements, and government policy documents in an effort to reveal the ethos which has driven the government’s adoption of lethal drones for counterterrorism. In doing so, the chapter advances an argument that Britain’s drone policy is the product of a set of morally problematic attitudes toward self-defence, justice and the imminence of terrorist threats.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Crawford, Emily. "Terrorism and targeted killings under international law." In Research Handbook on International Law and Terrorism, 223–38. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788972222.00024.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "Drones. Terrorism. Targeted killings"

Dorsey, Jessica, and Nilza Amaral. Military drones in Europe. Royal Institute of International Affairs, April 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.55317/9781784134556.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The use of armed drones, particularly to conduct targeted killings outside formal war zones, is highly contentious. In the contemporary context, where conflict has moved beyond the theatres of traditional warfare to take place in undefined battle zones, and is chiefly characterized by counterterrorism and counter-insurgency operations, drone use has brought to the fore critical questions on civilian casualties, the rule of law, secrecy and lack of accountability, among others. This paper has been developed as part of a project focusing on the policy implications for the UK and the EU of the use of armed drones. The analysis draws on discussions that took place at two research workshops and a simulation exercise held at Chatham House in 2019. The authors argue that the troubling questions raised by armed drone use should not just be a concern for countries that may use them in permissive ways. The EU and the UK, with a shared interest in upholding democratic values, need to work together on developing guidance on best practice for improving transparency and accountability around the use of armed drones.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!