Готові списки джерел за темами / Democracy

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Democracy"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021
Оновлено: 22 червня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Democracy".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Зміст

  1. Статті в журналах
  2. Дисертації
  3. Книги
  4. Частини книг
  5. Тези доповідей конференцій
  6. Звіти організацій

Статті в журналах з теми "Democracy":

1

Castlevetere, Teresa. "Democracia, minshushugi, democracy." Japanese Studies 10, no. 1 (June 1990): 60–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10371399008522019.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Chou, M. "Democrats against Democracy." Cultural Politics an International Journal 10, no. 2 (January 1, 2014): 163–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/17432197-2651756.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Martino, Antonio A. "Crisis de la democracia representativa: alternativas participativas o democracia directa con medios electrónicos = Crisis of representative democracy: participatory alternatives or direct democracy with electronic media." EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, no. 14 (March 19, 2018): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2018.4153.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Resumen: El artículo analiza la actual crisis de la democracia representativa criticando la tesis según la cual aquel país que instauraba una democracia y mantenía mínimos índices de solidez económica y social aseguraba su mantenimiento. A tal fin, inicia la explicación de la crisis de la democracia tout court y, después, va analizando las alternativas que se ofrecen a la democracia representativa. Así, aborda directamente la democracia directa para mostrar alguno de sus elementos más relevantes, sobre todo con medios electrónicos, y muestra posteriormente su reforzamiento.Palabras clave: Democracia, representación, democracia directa, democracia participativa.Abstract: The article presents the current crisis of representative democracy criticizing the thesis by which a country that reached democracy and maintained minimum rates of economic and social solidity had it insured. It explains first the crisis of democracy tout court and then analyzes the alternatives offered to representative democracy. It directly focuses on direct democracy to show important elements of it, above all with electronic means, to show later that elements of participatory democracy will be reinforced in the interim. Keywords: Democracy, representation, direct democracy, participatory democracy.
4

Oliveira, Joedson De Santana. "Uma concepção bidimensional de democracia como salvaguarda da liberdade/A two-dimensional design of democracy as a safeguard for freedom." Pensando - Revista de Filosofia 4, no. 8 (July 8, 2014): 164. http://dx.doi.org/10.26694/pensando.v4i8.1843.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Este trabalho tem o propósito de apresentar uma concepção republicana de democracia que não é uma democracia participativista nos moldes de Rousseau, que defendeu uma democracia direta, tampouco é uma democracia liberal que resume a participação ao sufrágio. Iremos argumentar que a democracia defendida dentro do republicanismo de Philip Pettit, entendida como democracia bidimensional, por ser ao mesmo tempo eleitoral e contestatória, é não só compatível com a defesa da liberdade, mas, também e, sobretudo, guardiã da mesma.Abstract: This paper aims to present a republican conception of democracy is not a democracy direct the lines of Rousseau, who argued for a direct democracy, nor is it a liberal democracy that summarizes the participation of suffrage. We will argue that democracy advocated in Philip Pettit's republicanism, democracy understood as two-dimensional, being at the same time and contestatory election, is not only compatible with the defense of freedom, but also and above all, the same guardian. Key words: Freedom; democracy; republicanism; Philip Pettit
5

Przeworski, Adam. "FREEDOM TO CHOOSE AND DEMOCRACY." Economics and Philosophy 19, no. 2 (October 2003): 265–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266267103001159.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Should democracts value the freedom to choose? Do people value facing distinct choices when they make collective decisions? ‘Autonomy’ – the ability to participate in the making of collective decisions – is a paltry notion of freedom. True, democrats must be prepared that their preferences may not be realized as the outcome of the collective choice. Yet democracy is impoverished when many people cannot even vote for what they most want.‘The point is not to be free, but to act freely.’ Rosa Luxemburg
6

Albuquerque, Newton De Menezes, and Guilherme Dourado Aragão Sá Araújo. "A democracia contemporânea e a crítica aos limites entre público e privado: por uma nova teoria da cidadania / The contemporary democracy and the critics of the limits between public and private: for a new theory of citizenship." Revista Brasileira de Direito 13, no. 3 (December 22, 2017): 607. http://dx.doi.org/10.18256/2238-0604.2017.v13i3.1175.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Resumo: Sob a óptica do problema da legitimidade das decisões democráticas, este trabalho expõe a necessidade de reversão da tendência publicista em prol de maior reconhecimento do poder deliberativo voluntário individual ou comunitário. Demonstrou-se o surgimento da democracia direta na Grécia antiga e as implicações modernas que levaram ao desenvolvimento das formas representativas, bem como seus problemas inerentes. Utilizando-se de pesquisa bibliográfica, o ensaio expõe que os mecanismos de verificação da legitimidade democrática não se mostraram suficientes para garantir a verdadeira democracia em seu aspecto material. Concluiu-se que esses problemas provocam a necessidade de se repensar o objeto deliberativo da democracia em questões eminentemente individuais como a união entre pessoas do mesmo sexo ou livre comércio de drogas e armas.Palavras-chave: teoria da democracia; legitimidade; democracia direta.Abstract: From the perspective of the problem of legitimacy of democratic decisions, this paper exposes the need for revert the publicist trend towards greater recognition of the individual or community volunteer deliberative power. It showed the appearance of the direct democracy in ancient Greece and the modern implications that led to the development of the representative forms, as well as its inherent problems. Through literature research, it states that the mechanisms of verification of democratic legitimacy were not sufficient to ensure true democracy in its material aspect. It concludes these problems cause the need to rethink democracy’s deliberative object in eminently individual issues such as same sex marriage or free trade of drugs and arms.Keywords: theory of democracy; legitimacy; direct democracy.
7

Markoff, John. "A Moving Target: Democracy." European Journal of Sociology 52, no. 2 (August 2011): 239–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003975611000105.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
AbstractAchieving consensus on a definition of “democracy” has proven elusive. Institutions that have been taken to be essential to democracy have changed radically since the word “democrat” began to be widely used toward the end of the eighteenth century. Democratic ideas and democratic practice engender conflict that transforms institutions rather than just reproduces them. Its transformative character rests on a half-dozen key attributes of democracy: it is an actor’s concept, as well as an analyst’s; it can arouse strong feelings; it combines not always compatible ideas; it empowers dissent; it involves a dynamic mixture of inclusion and exclusion; and the democratic histories of national states have been intertwined with global domination. Two processes combine to generate much social dynamism. First, democracy’s stirring inclusionary claims have been contradicted by a complex structure of exclusions, including distinctions in rights of full participation among citizens, distinctions in rights between citizens and non-citizens, and distinctions in resources among legally equal citizens. And second, democratic practice has been fertile soil for the development of social movements. Taken together, democracy is an invitation for movements to try to shift the boundaries of inclusion and exclusion, and in so doing to expand or constrict democracy itself.
8

Uscanga Barradas, Abril. "Democracia republicana = Republican Democracy." EUNOMÍA. Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad 13 (September 29, 2017): 221. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2017.3816.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Resumen: Este trabajo pretende explicar los orígenes e importancia del republicanismo como teoría aplicable a la democracia, así como su posible aplicación como una válvula de escape a la crisis democrática actual, pues últimamente se presentan numerosas y constantes críticas al sistema democrático imperante en nuestros días, lo que nos hace pensar en la existencia de una serie de deficiencias tanto políticas como sociales que, quizás, podrían ser subsanadas replanteando el modelo o visualizándolo desde otra perspectiva más acorde a los fines y necesidades de la sociedad contemporánea.Palabras clave: Democracia republicana, libertad como no dominación, virtudes cívicas, liberalismo, crisis democrática, Estado. Abstract: This paper aims to explain the origins and importance of republicanism as a theory applicable to democracy, as well as, its application like a scape valve of the democratic crisis that prevails today, currently, there are many criticisms of today's democratic system, which makes us think of the existence of a series of deficiencies both political and social that, maybe could be rethought or visualized from another perspective, more in line with the aims and needs of contemporary society.Keywords: Republican democracy, liberty without domination, civic virtues, liberalism, democratic crisis, State.
9

Denzin, Norman K. "Homegrown Democracy, Homegrown Democrats." Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 5, no. 1 (February 2005): 126–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532708604271530.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Belfrage, Claes. "The unintended consequences of financialisation: Social democracy hamstrung? The pensions dilemma." Economic and Industrial Democracy 38, no. 4 (May 18, 2015): 701–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143831x15586070.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
At the end of the Third Way and no sense of its future, social democrats look to Sweden for inspiration. However, Swedish social democracy is in no better condition. Scholarship is starting to grasp the broad outlines of the movement’s difficulties. Providing greater depth, this article employs the Social Systems of Innovation and Production approach to analyse Swedish social democracy’s current condition by historicising its current policy dilemmas in relation to the public pension system, once the jewel in the crown of the Rehn–Meidner model and the push for economic and industrial democracy, now the constraining legacy of financialisation.
Більше джерел
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Democracy" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах Дисертації Книги

Дисертації з теми "Democracy":

1

Naqvi, Ijlal Kurzman Charles. "Democrats without democracy? a multi-level analysis of attitudes towards democracy in Muslim-majority countries /." Chapel Hill, N.C. : University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2007. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/u?/etd,1656.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Thesis (M.A.)--University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2008.
Title from electronic title page (viewed Sep. 16, 2008). "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Sociology." Discipline: Sociology; Department/School: Sociology.
2

Johansson, Andreas. "Dissenting Democrats : Nation and Democracy in the Republic of Moldova." Doctoral thesis, Stockholms universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-64177.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
The Republic of Moldova was one of fifteen states to emerge from the dissolution of the Soviet Union. With weak historical legacy of statehood, deteriorating economy and serious national divisions, the young state lacked many of the prerequisites deemed necessary for successful democratization. From the very beginning of independence, Moldova became the battleground of Romanianists, propagating for the Romanian character of Moldova’s majority population, and Moldovanists, who viewed the people as a separate nation. In the literature on democracy and democratization, a divided nation is singled out as a serious threat to statehood and democratization efforts alike. Without a nation in place it is generally understood that democracy cannot take root. Nevertheless, Moldova in a few years time managed to make considerable progress on its path towards democracy. A main theme of the dissertation is thus the issue of national division and how it has affected political developments in general and democracy in specific. This picture is then further expanded by including close analysis of political support. The dissertation contributes to discussions about how nation and democracy goes together in transitional states with no legacy of either of them. The analysis shows that national division in Moldova works on different levels. While political actors often seek support from the electorate according to their positions on the nation, national identity by itself does not suffice to explain differences in political support. Instead other aspects, such as generational values, degree of urbanity and level of education, play a much larger role. Democracy, as a platform where different political ideas and ambitions may form, can both complicate transitions since it provides opportunities for conflicts, but democracy also holds the prospects to find ways to resolve disagreements. In the long run, this carries the seed of consolidation of both democracy and nation alike.
3

MAVHIKI, Ruvimbo Natalie. "Does democracy promotion promote democracy? The Zimbabwean case." Digital Commons @ Lingnan University, 2016. https://commons.ln.edu.hk/pol_etd/16.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Why has the increase in election funding by both Western international organizations and governmental donor agencies not resulted in the deepening and consolidation of democracy in most African countries? This study assesses this question with reference to Zimbabwe. Significant financial and technical commitments have been invested for the establishment and consolidation of democracy in Zimbabwe, but instead of democratic consolidation, Zimbabwe has oscillated from a de facto one party state to a competitive electoral democracy and then to an electoral authoritarian regime. What explains this puzzling phenomenon? Can democracy promotion promote democracy, and if not, what are the pre-requisites for successful elections and peaceful transfer of power? This project focuses on electoral democracy resulting in power transfer, where a successful election is followed by intra (within one party) or inter (between parties) transfer of power. In countries where elections are constantly held without an alternation of parties in power, can we say democracy promotion is ineffective or are there other factors that inhibit its effectiveness? In addressing these questions, this study argues that increases in election funding does not necessarily guarantee the advancement of democratization and good governance, although it finds that democracy promotion even where it does not result in power transfer does deepens democratic values. It does so by investigating the literature on the following variables presumed to affect democratization processes: democracy as a concept; democratic trends and its recession; democracy promotion’s motives, actors and strategies; democratization by elections in Africa; recipient practices; the role of opposition parties and their strength; the will of the recipient population; and the evolving problem of hybrid democracies given the rise of China and it's strengthening partnership and influence in Africa, all guided by electoral cycle processes. The study’s methodological contribution is a qualitative study of comprehensive empirical data of elections and democratic processes in Zimbabwe compared to those in Tanzania and Ethiopia. The study tests empirical generalizations on the development of democracy and African politics on Zimbabwe and evaluates various methodological approaches to the study of elections as they relate to Zimbabwe.
4

Schooley, Shawn Erik. "Appreciative Democracy." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/26696.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
This is a qualitative exploratory, descriptive study to ascertain the feasibility of public administrators at the local government level using an Appreciative Inquiry approach to increase direct citizen participation. It is framed by the interpretive paradigm. Twenty city managers or their designees from cities of between 40,000 and 250,000 citizens were interviewed. Specifically, respondents were asked twelve semi-structured interview questions. Content analysis was used to identify six themes in the data. Ultimately, this study found that Appreciative Inquiry may be useful in limited circumstances as long as barriers to implementation were adequately addressed. However, the potential risks may outweigh the benefits.
Ph. D.
5

CEROVAC, IVAN. "Epistemic Democracy." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Trieste, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2908039.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Il tema della mia tesi di dottorato è la giustificazione epistemica della legittimità democratica. Le questioni fondamentali sono: possono le nostre decisioni politiche essere giuste o sbagliate, oppure vere o false? Se possono essere vere o false, ci sono delle persone che sono più competenti nel realizzare le scelte giuste? Se la risposta è positiva, queste persone dovrebbero avere un’autorità politica superiore rispetto agli altri? Se la risposta è negativa, quale dovrebbe essere il ruolo degli esperti nei processi politici? Queste sono alcune delle domande più importanti alle quali cercherò di rispondere nella mia tesi di dottorato. Inizio con la confutazione della posizione chiamata “proceduralismo puro”, una posizione che sostiene che le decisioni politiche non possono avere il valore semantico di verità o che questo possibile valore è soggetto al disaccordo ragionevole. Cerco di dimostrare che le decisioni politiche possono essere giuste o sbagliate e che tutte le persone ragionevoli dovrebbero poter concordare almeno sull’indesiderabilità di alcuni casi chiari (per esempio le deprivazioni estreme e il genocidio). Confuto l'idea di uguaglianza epistemica, che sostiene che, anche se le decisioni politiche possono essere giuste o sbagliate, tutti i cittadini hanno un’uguale probabilità di prendere una decisione giusta. La nostra formazione, l’educazione ed il campo di specializzazione rendono alcune persone maggiormente affidabili dal punto di vista epistemico, almeno per quanto riguarda alcune questioni politiche. Infine, discuto e rifiuto l'idea per cui coloro che hanno maggiori competenze dovrebbero, in virtù di questo motivo, avere l’autorità politica di governare gli altri. I cittadini possono dissentire in modo ragionevole su chi sono gli esperti, e quindi l’autorità politica non può essere basata sulla competenza. Al contrario, deve essere basata sull'idea del consenso (normativo) tra i cittadini ragionevoli. Seguo la posizione di David Estlund e le offro ulteriore supporto. Questa posizione sostiene che, per poter avere la qualifica di legittimità, la procedura nella quale si prendono decisioni collettive dovrebbe avere qualità puramente procedurali (come il rispetto per l’uguaglianza morale dei cittadini) e qualità strumentali (come l’elevata probabilità di produrre decisioni corrette). La conseguenza è che le decisioni politiche sono legittime se (e soltanto se) sono il prodotto della procedura migliore dal punto di vista epistemico tra le varie procedure eque. Affermo che la democrazia deliberativa rappresenta una procedura di questo genere. Poiché l’equità delle procedure e le loro qualità epistemiche costituiscono ciò che può generare la loro legittimità, le procedure democratiche dovrebbero basarsi sulle qualità epistemiche dei più competenti (sebbene la competenza non sia più considerata come una delle basi dell'autorità politica), ma anche distribuire le risorse e gli incarichi pubblici con la finalità di favorire l’equità e l’uguaglianza nella comunità politica.
The subject of my thesis is the epistemic justification of democratic legitimacy. Can political decisions we make be right or wrong, or true or false? If they can be true or false, are there people who are better at getting it right or wrong? And if there are, does this imply that those who are better in making correct decision should have political authority over others? If not, what should be the role of experts in politics? These are some of the key questions I try to answer in this thesis. I start by rejecting pure proceduralism, a position claiming that political decisions have no truth-value, or that their truth-value is not above the reasonable disagreement. I argue that political decisions can be right or wrong and that, at least regarding some clear cases (like famine and genocide), all reasonable people should be able to agree on the (un)desirability of some end states. I also reject the idea of epistemic peerhood, one claiming that though political decisions are right or wrong, all citizens are equally likely to make a right decision. Our background, education and area of specialization make some people more epistemically reliable, at least regarding some political issues. Finally, I discuss and reject the idea that those who know best should have political authority to rule over others. Citizens can reasonably disagree on who the experts are, and thus political authority cannot be grounded in expertise, but instead in the idea of (normative) consent of reasonable citizens. I follow and further support David Estlund's position, claiming that a collective decision-making procedure should have both purely procedural (respect for the moral equality of citizens) and instrumental (good chance to produce correct decisions) qualities in order to have legitimacy-generating potential. Political decisions are therefore legitimate if (and only if) they are the product of epistemically the best procedure from among the set of fair procedures. I argue that deliberative democracy is such a procedure. Since the fairness of the procedure and epistemic quality of outcomes constitute its legitimacy-generating potential, democratic procedures should still rely on the expertise of those who know better (though expertise is no longer considered as a ground for political authority), but also distribute resources and positions to promote fairness and equality in a political community.
6

Whitfied, Lindsay. "Democracy as idea and democracy as process : the politics of democracy and development in Ghana." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2005. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.422516.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Fowler, Michael W. "Deepening democracy explaining variations in the levels of democracy /." Monterey, Calif. : Naval Postgraduate School, 2010. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/dissert/2010/Jun/10Jun%5FFowler%5FPhD.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Dissertation (Ph.D. in Security Studies)--Naval Postgraduate School, June 2010.
Dissertation supervisor: Trinkunas, Harold. "June 2010." Description based on title screen as viewed on July 14, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: Democracy, democratization, consolidation, transition, economic development, industrialization, insurgency, violence, diffusion, democratic norms, Philippines, Mexico, Senegal, quantitative, econometric computational model, supply, demand, structural actors, agency, institution, autocracy Includes bibliographical references (p. 257-275). Also available in print.
8

Schneider, Andrew James. "Transparency democracy architecture supporting the social ideals of democracy /." Cincinnati, Ohio : University of Cincinnati, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view.cgi?acc_num=ucin1211936111.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
Thesis (Master of Architecture)--University of Cincinnati, 2008.
Advisors: Elizabeth Riorden (Committee Chair), Jay Chatterjee (Committee Co-Chair). Title from electronic theses title page (viewed Sept 4, 2008.). Includes abstract. Keywords: architecture and democracy; transparency; mediatheque; openness; library. Includes bibliographical references.
9

SCHNEIDER, ANDREW JAMES. "Transparency = Democracy Architecture Supporting the Social Ideals of Democracy." University of Cincinnati / OhioLINK, 2008. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=ucin1211936111.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Esperanza, Casullo Maria. "Expanding the borders of democracy deliberative democracy and populism /." Connect to Electronic Thesis (CONTENTdm), 2009. http://worldcat.org/oclc/525166640/viewonline.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Democracy":

1

Costa, Marta Nunes. Democracia hoje: Democracy today. Ribeirão: Húmus, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Rachman, M. Fadjroel. Democracy without the democrats: Freedom, democracy, and the welfare state. Jakarta: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Odimegwu, Ike. Nigerian democracy & global democracy. Awka [Nigeria] : Department of Philosophy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University: Fab Educational Books, c2008., 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Odimegwu, Ike. Nigerian democracy & global democracy. Awka [Nigeria] : Department of Philosophy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University: Fab Educational Books, c2008., 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Nylen, William R. Participatory Democracy versus Elitist Democracy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403980304.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Friedberg, Chen, and Gideon Rahat. Collegial Democracy versus Personal Democracy. London: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003350545.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Nathaniel, Harris. Democracy. London: Wayland, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Arblaster, Anthony. Democracy. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1987.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Arblaster, Anthony. Democracy. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Laxer, James. Democracy. Toronto: Groundwood Books/House of Anansi Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Democracy":

1

Galbraith, James K. "Defending Democrats … and Democracy." In Unbearable Cost, 12–14. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230236721_4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Kisker, Carrie B., John J. Theis, and Alberto Olivas. "Enacting Democracy in “Democracy's Colleges”." In Creating Space for Democracy, 275–84. New York: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003443810-32.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Ostrowski, Marius S. "Democracy in Social Democracy." In Eduard Bernstein on Socialism Past and Present, 635–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50484-7_32.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Weiler, Kathleen. "Exporting Democracy/Defending Democracy." In Democracy and Schooling in California, 137–56. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137015914_8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Ostrowski, Marius S. "Democracy in Social Democracy." In Eduard Bernstein on Socialism Past and Present, 635–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50484-7_32.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Wong, Mathew Y. H. "Democracy." In Comparative Hong Kong Politics, 71–104. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3096-3_5.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Heywood, Andrew. "Democracy." In Political Ideologies, 269–94. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21965-0_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Morlino, Leonardo. "Democracy." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Interest Groups, Lobbying and Public Affairs, 1–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13895-0_65-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Shorten, Andrew. "Democracy." In Contemporary Political Theory, 107–39. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-29916-1_5.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Raphael, D. D. "Democracy." In Problems of Political Philosophy, 83–112. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20996-5_4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Democracy":

1

Zawadzka-Pąk, Urszula K., and Paweł Jamróz. "Can Democracy Harm Public Finance? Some Evidences from Europe." In The XX International Scientific Conference "Functioning of Investments Financed from State Resources and from Other Sources in The Countries of Central And Eastern Europe". Temida 2, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/ipf.2022.21.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Анотація:
James Buchanan and Richard Wagner in their famous book “Democracy in Deficit” note that democracy has not enough fiscal discipline because the citizens’ representatives are chosen in the election and they take the budgetary decisions seeking the re-election. Their theory of public choice may suggest the existence of a positive relationship between the democracy’s quality and the public debt level reflecting the long-lasting consequences of the budgetary decisions of policy-makers. Thus, we formulate the following research question: Is democratic system harmful for public finance? To operationalize the democratic system, we use five democracy indices (i.e., electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian), and the public debt to operationalize the threat for public finance. Conclusions put in a new light the theory, as first the study confirmed that there are statistically significant relationships between democracy’s quality and public debt and, however not in case of every democracy index and every European country.
2

Etter, Vincent, Julien Herzen, Matthias Grossglauser, and Patrick Thiran. "Mining democracy." In the second edition of the ACM conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2660460.2660476.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Sarkar, Medha S., and James H. William. "Digital democracy." In the 48th Annual Southeast Regional Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1900008.1900083.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Franklin-Hodge, Jascha. "Digital democracy." In the 2013 conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2441776.2441779.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Best, Michael L., and Amanda Meng. "Twitter democracy." In the Seventh International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2737856.2738017.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Montenegro, Carlos-Daniel, Pedro Nunes-Da-Silva, and Carlos Montenegro. "E-Democracy." In ICDEL 2020: 2020 the 5th International Conference on Distance Education and Learning. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3402569.3402596.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Takahashi, Mitsuru. "REEXAMINING THE DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY: COMMUNITY, ADULT EDUCATION AND DEMOCRACY." In 6th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS Proceedings. STEF92 Technology, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2019v/1.1/s01.007.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Zhu, PingPing. "Equality of Democracy." In 2015 Joint International Social Science, Education, Language, Management and Business Conference. Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/jisem-15.2015.41.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Ramírez Medina, Valeriano. "Democracy and society." In 3rd International e-Conference on Studies in Humanities and Social Sciences. Center for Open Access in Science, Belgrade, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.32591/coas.e-conf.03.08085r.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Beaumaster, Suzanne, Ann Macintosh, and Eric Welch. "Minitrack: Electronic Democracy." In 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07). IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2007.370.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "Democracy":

1

Gallahue, Kimo C. Why Democracy? Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada559870.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Bentley, David. Operation Uphold Democracy: Military Support for Democracy in Haiti. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, June 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada385749.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Treisman, Daniel. Democracy by mistake. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23944.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Al-Sewaji, Hamad N. Democracy in Kuwait. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada362984.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

George, Keith A. Promotion of Democracy. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, April 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada415083.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Barro, Robert. Democracy & Growth. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w4909.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, James Robinson, and Pierre Yared. Income and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w11205.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

O'Rourke, Kevin, and Alan Taylor. Democracy and Protectionism. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, May 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12250.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Eichengreen, Barry. Democracy and Globalization. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w12450.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Emmerson, Carl, and John Hall. Modernising local democracy. Institute for Fiscal Studies, May 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1920/co.ifs.1998.0070.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

До бібліографії