Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Decision effectiveness"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Decision effectiveness".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Decision effectiveness"

1

Leatherman, Sheila, and Louise Warrick. "Effectiveness of Decision Aids." Medical Care Research and Review 65, no. 6_suppl (December 2008): 79S—116S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077558708324234.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Reagan, Patricia, and John Rohrbaugh. "Group Decision Process Effectiveness." Group & Organization Studies 15, no. 1 (March 1990): 20–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/105960119001500103.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Nagy, Viktor. "Evaluation of Decision Effectiveness Over Time." Economics and Culture 15, no. 2 (December 1, 2018): 34–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/jec-2018-0018.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract In this paper, the results of my research are presented that was carried out on a large sample to investigate how people look back at their previous business decisions. After a short literature overview, considering the role of time, the paper deals with the primary research: how people judge their decisions in the short term and in the long run, that is, how confident they are that the right one was chosen applying the available knowledge of facts and conditions connected with or relevant to their situation. Using statistical methods, comparisons were made, for example, based on the respondents’ gender, so it turns out whether gender has an influence on self-confidence or on exactness of judgement. Does the position, that is, the rank matter? Can it be assumed that the farther one gets up the corporate ladder, the more certainty can be observed about their decisions? And what about educational level? Does it influence judgement in a decision? Those who do not regret their decisions after a while, that is, after the original decisions were made, while being in possession of the information available later, can be more successful in business because they made the best decision. Trying to identify such characteristics or factors can be an advantage in the business life.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Harrison, E. Frank, and Monique A. Pelletier. "Foundations of strategic decision effectiveness." Management Decision 36, no. 3 (April 1998): 147–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00251749810208931.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

McAlpine, Kristen, Krystina B. Lewis, Lyndal J. Trevena, and Dawn Stacey. "What Is the Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Cancer-Related Decisions? A Systematic Review Subanalysis." JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, no. 2 (December 2018): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/cci.17.00148.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Purpose To determine the effectiveness of patient decision aids when used with patients who face cancer-related decisions. Patients and Methods Two reviewers independently screened the 105 trials in the original 2017 Cochrane review to identify eligible trials of patient decision aids across the cancer continuum. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice and decision-making process. Secondary outcomes were patient behavior and health system effects. A meta-analysis was conducted for similar outcome measures. Results Forty-six trials evaluated patient decision aids for cancer care, including 27 on screening decisions (59%), 12 on treatments (26%), four on genetic testing (9%), and three on prevention (6%). Common decisions were aboutprostate cancer screening (30%), colorectal cancer screening (22%), breast cancer treatment (13%), and prostate cancer treatment (9%). Compared with the control groups (usual care or alternative interventions), the patient decision aid group improved the match between the chosen option and the features that mattered most to the patient as demonstrated by improved knowledge (weighted mean difference, 12.88 of 100; 95% CI, 9.87 to 15.89; 24 trials), accurate risk perception (risk ratio [RR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.56; six trials), and value-choice agreement (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.57 to 4.84; nine trials). Compared with controls, the patient decision aid group improved the decision-making process with decreased decisional conflict (weighted mean difference, −9.56 of 100; 95% CI, −13.90 to −5.23; 12 trials), reduced clinician-controlled decision making (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79; eight trials), and fewer patients being indecisive (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.78; nine trials). Conclusion Patient decision aids improve the attributes of the choice made and decision-making process for patients who face cancer-related decisions.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Chen, Lu, Baiyin Yang, and Runtian Jing. "Paternalistic Leadership, Team Conflict, and TMT Decision Effectiveness: Interactions in the Chinese Context." Management and Organization Review 11, no. 4 (November 26, 2015): 739–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mor.2015.34.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
ABSTRACTIn this article, we propose that types of CEO paternalistic leadership will affect the effectiveness of top management team (TMT) decisions, and that team conflict will play a mediating role in the relationship between CEO paternalistic leadership and decision effectiveness in the Chinese context. Data collected from 108 TMTs in China suggest that dimensions of paternalistic leadership significantly affect decision effectiveness: benevolent and moral leadership positively affect TMT decision effectiveness, but authoritarian leadership has negative effects on TMT decision effectiveness. In addition, cognitive and affective team conflicts partially mediate the links between paternalistic leadership types and decision effectiveness. The results suggest that CEO paternalistic leadership approaches and conflict modes significantly determine TMT decision effectiveness.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Vučetić, Dejan. "Effectiveness of procedural decisions in first-instance administrative proceedings." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis 60, no. 91 (2021): 75–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn0-33292.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The paper analyzes the normative regulation of the procedural administrative decision institute, which was introduced into the Serbian administrative process as a novelty by the General Administrative Procedure Act (GAPA) in 2016. The paper aims to addresses three research questions: to determine the legislator's goal in regulating this insitute, to identify in which situations such a decision has to be made, and to establish how effective that type of decision is. At the beginning of the paper, the author focuses on the concept of effectiveness, including different, mutually opposed, approaches to defining that notion. The author points out the conceptual misunderstanding between efficiency and effectiveness, and their unjustified equalization. The main goal of introducing the institute of procedural administrative decision is the aspiration for greater protection of parties' procedural rights. The analysis of the text of the General Administrative Procedure Act has yielded seventeen basic types of procedural administrative decisions: a decision on rejecting the party's request, a decision not to allow alteration of the party's request, a decision on suspending the procedure, a decision on termination of the procedure, a decision on imposing a fine, decision on request, a decision on execution, a decision on securing the execution, a decision on appointing a temporary representative, a decision on denying representation to a quack lawyer for unlicenced practice of law, a decision on proposal for restitution, a decision on bearing preliminary procedure costs, a decision on exemption from procedure costs, a decision on payment of costs resulting from the absence or unjustified denial of testimony, a decision on compensation for damage to the holder, a decision on the proposal for providing evidence, and a decision on ordering an interim measure. The author concludes that the institute of procedural administrative decision can negatively affect the effectiveness of administrative proceedings due to the possibility of its unnecessary extension.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Osmani, Juliana. "The Impact of Group Size on Decision Effectiveness." European Journal of Marketing and Economics 3, no. 2 (October 15, 2020): 108. http://dx.doi.org/10.26417/392xlk97w.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The relationship between organization and environment, based on the need to gather information and find resources, is increasingly characterized by a high level of uncertainty. Uncertainty means that managers do not have enough information and time to anticipate changes and make good decisions. More and more managers make decisions about new problems or situations. The level of risk increases, as well as the degree of complexity that the decision maker has to face. Under these conditions, organizations are moving towards the use of groups. The main purpose of the current research is to identify what are the most important benefits and limits of the group referring to its size, taking into analysis the banking institutions. For the current study is adopted the quantitative research and for the data collection is used the questionnaire. A total of 344 questionnaire are distributed. 80 percent of the participants agree that group size affects the quality of the decisions made and most of them prefer small groups. Also, most of them believe that within large groups are more conflicts, the relationships between members are more formal, the attention and individual commitment are lower than in small groups, the consensus is difficult, decisions can be made only through a voting process and there are no delays in decision-making, but coordination problems are not necessarily higher than within small groups.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Krupa, Tadeusz, and Teresa Ostrowska. "Decision-Making in Flat and Hierarchical Decision Problems." Foundations of Management 4, no. 2 (December 1, 2012): 23–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/fman-2013-0008.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract The article is dedicated to the modelling of the essence of decision-taking processes in flat and hierarchical decision problems. In flat decision problems particular attention is drawn to the effectiveness of strategies in seeking decision variants on solution decomposition trees, taking into account the strength of their predefined contradictions. For hierarchical decision processes, the issue of iterative balancing of global (hierarchical) decisions is expressed, based on the valuation of the significance of flat decisions.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Hibino, Masaya, Chisato Hamashima, Mitsunaga Iwata, and Teruhiko Terasawa. "Effectiveness of decision aids on cancer-screening decision-making: an umbrella review protocol." BMJ Open 11, no. 12 (December 2021): e051156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051156.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
IntroductionAlthough systematic reviews have shown how decision aids about cancer-related clinical decisions improve selection of key options and shared decision-making, whether or not particular decision aids, defined by their specific presentation formats, delivery methods and other attributes, can perform better than others in the context of cancer-screening decisions is uncertain. Therefore, we planned an overview to address this issue by using standard umbrella review methods to repurpose existing systematic reviews and their component comparative studies.Methods and analysisWe will search PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects from inception through 31 December 2021 with no language restriction and perform full-text evaluation of potentially relevant articles. We will include systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials or non-randomised studies of interventions that assessed a decision aid about cancer-screening decisions and compared it with an alternative tool or conventional management in healthy average-risk adults. Two reviewers will extract data and rate the study validity according to standard quality assessment measures. Our primary outcome will be intended and actual choice and adherence to selected options. The secondary outcomes will include attributes of the option-selection process, achieving shared decision-making and preference-linked psychosocial outcomes. We will qualitatively assess study, patient and intervention characteristics and outcomes. We will also take special care to investigate the presentation format, delivery methods and quality of the included decision aids and assess the degree to which the decision aid was delivered and used as intended. If appropriate, we will perform random-effects model meta-analyses to quantitatively synthesise the results.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not applicable as this is a secondary analysis of publicly available data. The review results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.Prospero registration numberCRD42021235957.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Дисертації з теми "Decision effectiveness"

1

Filippi, Viviane. "Decision-making between rationality and intuition: effectiveness conditions and solutions to enhance decision efficacy." Doctoral thesis, Luiss Guido Carli, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11385/203848.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Decision-making, one process, many theories: a multidisciplinary literature review. How individual and environmental factors interact and influence the effectiveness of strategic decisions through rational and intuitive dynamics. Mentoring and the promotion of self-confidence in decision-making: the role of cognitive awareness and expertise building through the lenses of rationality and intuition.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Hard, Nancy J. (Nancy Jean). "Empirical Research of Decision-making Effectiveness When Using Differing Presentation Formats Under Varying Decision Tasks." Thesis, University of North Texas, 1988. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc279040/.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The purpose of this research was to determine if presentation format, given a particular task to be performed, would affect the decision-making process of financial decision makers. The problem motivating this study is the potential for managers to make inefficient decisions when they use reports which are presented inappropriately for a given task.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Briggs, Andrew H. "Uncertainty in the cost-effectiveness of health care interventions." Thesis, University of Oxford, 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.299755.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Vazquez, Rita Esther Zapata. "Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis based on a decision analytic model." Thesis, University of Sheffield, 2008. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.522516.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Shirindza, Mxolisi. "Understanding factors that enable and inhibit strategic decision making effectiveness." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/52317.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The literature review has revealed that strategic decisions are complex, ill-structured and require much of organizational resources. Organizations are dependent on strategic decisions for sustained performance or even survival. Strategic decision-making is important in an organization as it is the process used to implement the strategic intent of the firm. Literature has also revealed that managers fail to process optimally, information for effective strategic decision-making due to their cognitive limits. This study set out to explore and understand the enablers and inhibitors of strategic decision-making effectiveness. The study was conducted using an exploratory qualitative method, which consisted of in-depth semi-structured interviews. A total of 14 executives and managers were interviewed from coal mining organizations operating in the Mpumalanga province of South Africa. Interviews were recorded then transcribed into text. Directed content and frequency analysis were used to analyze the data and extract common themes. ATLAS.ti was used for the coding process during data analysis. The findings of this study were the enablers and inhibitors of strategic decision-making effectiveness being discussed in detail. An empirically based framework was developed using the findings on ensuring strategic decision-making effectiveness. The factors used for the framework are : having support from the superiors, have a competent team in strategic decision-making, considering the external business environment, considering and involving stakeholders, ensure the quality of data and continuously review strategic decision-making process.
Mini Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2015.
sn2016
Gordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
MBA
Unrestricted
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Ligabue, Veronica <1986&gt. "Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Retrofit Options to Support Decision Making." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2015. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/7175/1/Ligabue_Veronica_tesi.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
How to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of repair/retrofit intervention vs. demolition/replacement and what level of shaking intensity can the chosen repairing/retrofit technique sustain are open questions affecting either the pre-earthquake prevention, the post-earthquake emergency and the reconstruction phases. The (mis)conception that the cost of retrofit interventions would increase linearly with the achieved seismic performance (%NBS) often discourages stakeholders to consider repair/retrofit options in a post-earthquake damage situation. Similarly, in a pre-earthquake phase, the minimum (by-law) level of %NBS might be targeted, leading in some cases to no-action. Furthermore, the performance measure enforcing owners to take action, the %NBS, is generally evaluated deterministically. Not directly reflecting epistemic and aleatory uncertainties, the assessment can result in misleading confidence on the expected performance. The present study aims at contributing to the delicate decision-making process of repair/retrofit vs. demolition/replacement, by developing a framework to assist stakeholders with the evaluation of the effects in terms of long-term losses and benefits of an increment in their initial investment (targeted retrofit level) and highlighting the uncertainties hidden behind a deterministic approach. For a pre-1970 case study building, different retrofit solutions are considered, targeting different levels of %NBS, and the actual probability of reaching Collapse when considering a suite of ground-motions is evaluated, providing a correlation between %NBS and Risk. Both a simplified and a probabilistic loss modelling are then undertaken to study the relationship between %NBS and expected direct and indirect losses.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Ligabue, Veronica <1986&gt. "Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Retrofit Options to Support Decision Making." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2015. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/7175/.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
How to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of repair/retrofit intervention vs. demolition/replacement and what level of shaking intensity can the chosen repairing/retrofit technique sustain are open questions affecting either the pre-earthquake prevention, the post-earthquake emergency and the reconstruction phases. The (mis)conception that the cost of retrofit interventions would increase linearly with the achieved seismic performance (%NBS) often discourages stakeholders to consider repair/retrofit options in a post-earthquake damage situation. Similarly, in a pre-earthquake phase, the minimum (by-law) level of %NBS might be targeted, leading in some cases to no-action. Furthermore, the performance measure enforcing owners to take action, the %NBS, is generally evaluated deterministically. Not directly reflecting epistemic and aleatory uncertainties, the assessment can result in misleading confidence on the expected performance. The present study aims at contributing to the delicate decision-making process of repair/retrofit vs. demolition/replacement, by developing a framework to assist stakeholders with the evaluation of the effects in terms of long-term losses and benefits of an increment in their initial investment (targeted retrofit level) and highlighting the uncertainties hidden behind a deterministic approach. For a pre-1970 case study building, different retrofit solutions are considered, targeting different levels of %NBS, and the actual probability of reaching Collapse when considering a suite of ground-motions is evaluated, providing a correlation between %NBS and Risk. Both a simplified and a probabilistic loss modelling are then undertaken to study the relationship between %NBS and expected direct and indirect losses.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Chun, Ki-Jeong. "The effectiveness of a facilitated group decision support system (decision conferencing) : a UK/US field study." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 1992. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/1356/.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The increasingly complex and turbulent business environments of these days frequently require greater specialised knowledge pertaining to the issues, which are usually beyond that of any individual. Therefore, group meetings are becoming more complex, more frequent, and more important. As part of the transition into this new environment together with recent advancements in computers, telecommunications and management science techniques, organisational researchers have made serious efforts to use advanced technologies to improve group meetings. An example of such attempts is the development of a Group Decision Support System (GDSS), an application of information technology to support the work of groups. One common example of GDSSs is the Decision Conferencing (DC), which combines the use of decision analytic softwares to incorporate the differing perspectives of the participants with group facilitation techniques. This thesis systematically reviews the existing case, field, and laboratory decision room type GDSS studies. It, then, explores the plausible factors for the inconsistent findings across studies. Main objective of the thesis, however, is to investigate the effectiveness of a DC in aiding group work with regard to decision processes, overall user attitudes, and decision quality, and to identify variables associated with differences in perceived effectiveness. Three theories were employed to build a conceptual framework with criteria by which to describe and evaluate the effectiveness of decision making in GDSS settings: Competing Values Approach, Stratified Systems Theory, and Human Information Processing Model. It was shown that these three approaches share common theoretical assumptions. Then, quantitative data were collected through a mailed questionnaire of participants in 22 conferences, hosted by the Decision Conferences Inc. in the U.S.A., Decision Analysis Unit at London School of Economics, and International Computers Ltd. in the U.K. Overall, a DC was perceived better than a conventional meeting for all of the evaluation criteria. The effectiveness of a DC, however, was perceived differently according to various factors: participants' levels in the executive hierarchy, differences in the culture and style of the organisation, task differences in terms of the degree of threat, group size, variety of facilitators, and careers of the participants. Of greater interest is the finding that independent of the numerous variables above, a DC was perceived highly effective in terms of user attitudes, improved decision quality, adaptable process, goal-centred process, and efficiency of decision; and relatively less effective with regard to implementation, and accountability of decision.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Sanders, Joseph F. "Analytic study of criteria to maximize the effectiveness and quality of decision making." Lynchburg, Va. : Liberty University, 2002. http://digitalcommons.liberty.edu.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Yu, Fahong. "A cost benefit evaluation server for supporting general decision-making." [Gainesville, Fla.] : University of Florida, 2001. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0000367.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thesis (M.S.)--University of Florida, 2001.
Title from title page of source document. Document formatted into pages; contains ix, 60 p.; also contains graphics. Includes vita. Includes bibliographical references.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Decision effectiveness"

1

System effectiveness. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press, 1987.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

A, Guzzo Richard, and Salas Eduardo, eds. Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Asche, Carl, ed. Applying Comparative Effectiveness Data to Medical Decision Making. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23329-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Gänswein, Wolfgang. Effectiveness of Information Use for Strategic Decision Making. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6849-4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Gänswein, Wolfgang. Effectiveness of Information Use for Strategic Decision Making. Wiesbaden: Gabler Verlag / Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, Wiesbaden, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Communicating in groups: Building relationships for group effectiveness. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Birnbaum, Howard G., and Paul E. Greenberg, eds. Decision Making in a World of Comparative Effectiveness Research. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3262-2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Fraser, Neil. A framework for social policy decision-making. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Dept. of Social Policy, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Remodel or move?: Make the right decision. Sunnyvale, Calif: ABCD Pub., 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Jane, English Diana, Washington (State). Dept. of Social and Health Services., and Washington (State). Children's Administration. Management Services Division. Office of Children's Administration Research., eds. Decision-making in child protective services, a study of effectiveness. Olympia, WA (P.O. Box 45701, Olympia, 98504-5701): Office of Children's Administration Research, Management Services Division, Children's Administration, Dept. of Social and Health Services, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "Decision effectiveness"

1

Ammons, David N., and Dale J. Roenigk. "Cost-effectiveness analysis." In Tools for Decision Making, 283–96. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003129431-27.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Crossland, Martin D. "Decision-Making Effectiveness with GIS." In Encyclopedia of GIS, 1–4. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23519-6_271-2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Crossland, Martin D. "Decision-Making Effectiveness with GIS." In Encyclopedia of GIS, 460–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17885-1_271.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Crossland, Martin D. "Decision‐Making Effectiveness with GIS." In Encyclopedia of GIS, 232–35. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35973-1_271.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Tran, Thien Anh. "Decision-Making Tools: University Technology Transfer Effectiveness." In Hierarchical Decision Modeling, 255–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18558-3_12.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Rosanas, Josep Maria. "Effectiveness, Attractiveness, and Unity." In Decision-Making in an Organizational Context, 153–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137324153_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Moreno, Elías, Francisco-José Vázquez–Polo, Miguel A. Negrín, and María Martel–Escobar. "The Bayesian Cost–Effectiveness Decision Problem." In Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1–8. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60882-2_1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Poulose, Benjamin K. "Decision Analysis and Cost-Effectiveness Research." In Health Services Research, 229–36. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28357-5_19.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Belov, Mikhail V., and Dmitry A. Novikov. "Effectiveness and Efficiency of Complex Activity." In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 151–60. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48610-5_6.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Yang, Hongjiu, Yuanqing Xia, and Qing Geng. "Fault-Tolerant Control with Effectiveness Loss." In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 331–49. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3660-7_18.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Decision effectiveness"

1

Collard, Fiona, and Jonathan M. Garibaldi. "Measuring healthcare decision aid effectiveness." In 2012 25th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cbms.2012.6266353.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Jones, C. R., and S. Guerlain. "Measuring the effectiveness of a "decision matrix" for missile retargeting decisions." In 2004 IEEE Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium. IEEE, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sieds.2004.239942.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Tsitovich, Fedor, and Ivan Tsitovich. "Sample space reducing for statistical decision effectiveness increasing." In 2014 6th International Congress on Ultra Modern Telecommunications and Control Systems and Workshops (ICUMT). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icumt.2014.7002152.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Zhang, Shuang, Wei Li, Shenglin Lin, Ming Yang, and Jiahui Tong. "Design of Reusable Effectiveness Evaluation Model Framework." In 2020 Chinese Control And Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccdc49329.2020.9164707.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Yu, Zhang. "Environmental protection effectiveness of China's taxation policy." In 2016 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccdc.2016.7531134.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

van Beek, Anton. "A Decision-Centric Perspective on Evolving Cyber-Physical-Social Systems: Effectiveness, Group Value, and Opportunities." In ASME 2022 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2022-90161.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract In this paper, we view evolving cyber-physical-social systems (CPSSs) from a group decision-making perspective, introduce the group value concept as a potential approach to improve their effectiveness, and conclude by identifying a set of research directions for further scientific inquiry. An evolving CPSS is a system in which the digital and physical spaces adapt to changing interests in the social space. In this paper, we introduce the group value concept as an approach to balancing the interests of individuals in the social space and deciding how a CPSS should evolve. The advantages afforded by the group value concept are twofold: (i) it enables CPSSs to evolve along with the interests of the social space, and (ii) it provides transparency in the decision-making process that will improve public support. The group value is a stochastic function that is constructed by modeling the distributions of individual value functions and shares a similarity with utility-theory and normative models for group decision-making. Through analysis of the introduced framework, we show: (i) how the group value concept can be used to bring about evolving CPSSs, (ii) introduce the difference between utility theory and normative models for group decision-making, (iii) define the conditions under which the introduced evolving CPSSs framework is valid, and (iv) delineate a set of four research areas for further scientific inquiry. The motivation for delineating a set of additional research challenges comes from the observation that group decisions violate the conditions of logical decision-making that can only be satisfied for an individual’s decisions. Consequently, establishing an agent that controls the evolution of a CPSS needs to consider the consequences of violating these conditions on the effectiveness of the decision. Through continued research in the identified decision-centric research areas, evolving CPPSs can be established to address many societal challenges and will be more effective as they enjoy broader public support.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Zhenguo, Duan. "Effectiveness model analysis of anti-tank missiles." In 2013 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ccdc.2013.6561401.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Feng, Qiang, Shengkui Zeng, Bo Sun, and Huafu Li. "Stochastic multi-attribute decision making method aiming at effectiveness." In 2009 8th International Conference on Reliability, Maintainability and Safety (ICRMS 2009). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icrms.2009.5270225.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Akanmu, Semiu A., and Zulikha Jamaludin. "Measuring InfoVis' decision support effectiveness: From theory to practice." In 2015 Science and Information Conference (SAI). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sai.2015.7237198.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Xianjun, Zhu, Xiao Fangxiong, Ma Ningling, Dai Di, Zhou Xianzhong, and Hu Wenting. "Effectiveness Evaluation of Humanware Service in Novel Decision System." In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control (ICNSC). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icnsc48988.2020.9238071.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "Decision effectiveness"

1

Tamba, Yvonne, Caroline Muchiri, Keith Shepherd, Grace Muinga, and Eike Luedeling. Increasing DryDev’s Effectiveness and Efficiency through Probabilistic Decision Modelling. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5716/wp17107.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Geary, Patrick J. Operations Security (OPSEC), Decision-Making and Operational Effectiveness in a Multinational Environment. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada381647.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Girard, P. E. Command and Control Systems Requirements Analysis. Volume 2. Measuring C2 Effectiveness with Decision Probability. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada229146.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY CA. Multi Attribute Decision Analysis in Public Health - Analyzing Effectiveness of Alternate Modes of Dispensing. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada474082.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Mathieu, John E., William R. Breetz, and Karl M. Prewo. Integrated Multi-Team Decision Making Processes and Effectiveness and the Connecticut Center for Advanced Technology. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada426803.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Saldanha, Ian J., Andrea C. Skelly, Kelly Vander Ley, Zhen Wang, Elise Berliner, Eric B. Bass, Beth Devine, et al. Inclusion of Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions in Systematic Reviews of Intervention Effectiveness: An Update. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.23970/ahrqepcmethodsguidenrsi.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Introduction: Nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) are observational or experimental studies of the effectiveness and/or harms of interventions, in which participants are not randomized to intervention groups. There is increasingly widespread recognition that advancements in the design and analysis of NRSIs allow NRSI evidence to have a much more prominent role in decision making, and not just as ancillary evidence to randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Objective: To guide decisions about inclusion of NRSIs for addressing the effects of interventions in systematic reviews (SRs), this chapter updates the 2010 guidance on inclusion of NRSIs in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) SRs. The chapter focuses on considerations for decisions to include or exclude NRSIs in SRs. Methods: In November 2020, AHRQ convened a 20-member workgroup that comprised 13 members representing 8 of 9 AHRQ-appointed EPCs, 3 AHRQ representatives, 1 independent consultant with expertise in SRs, and 3 representatives of the AHRQ-appointed Scientific Resource Center. The workgroup received input from the full EPC Program regarding the process and specific issues through discussions at a virtual meeting and two online surveys regarding challenges with NRSI inclusion in SRs. One survey focused on current practices by EPCs regarding NRSI inclusion in ongoing and recently completed SRs. The other survey focused on the appropriateness, completeness, and usefulness of existing EPC Program methods guidance. The workgroup considered the virtual meeting and survey input when identifying aspects of the guidance that needed updating. The workgroup used an informal method for generating consensus about guidance. Disagreements were resolved through discussion. Results: We outline considerations for the inclusion of NRSIs in SRs of intervention effectiveness. We describe the strengths and limitations of RCTs, study design features and types of NRSIs, and key considerations for making decisions about inclusion of NRSIs (during the stages of topic scoping and refinement, SR team formation, protocol development, SR conduct, and SR reporting). We discuss how NRSIs may be applicable for the decisional dilemma being addressed in the SR, threats to the internal validity of NRSIs, as well as various data sources and advanced analytic methods that may be used in NRSIs. Finally, we outline an approach to incorporating NRSIs within an SR and key considerations for reporting. Conclusion: The main change from the previous guidance is the overall approach to decisions about inclusion of NRSIs in EPC SRs. Instead of recommending NRSI inclusion only if RCTs are insufficient to address the Key Question, this updated guidance handles NRSI evidence as a valuable source of information and lays out important considerations for decisions about the inclusion of NRSIs in SRs of intervention effectiveness. Different topics may require different decisions regarding NRSI inclusion. This guidance is intended to improve the utility of the final product to end-users. Inclusion of NRSIs will increase the scope, time, and resources needed to complete SRs, and NRSIs pose potential threats to validity, such as selection bias, confounding, and misclassification of interventions. Careful consideration must be given to both concerns.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Peterson, Gary, Rebecca Ryan-Jones, James Sampson, Robert Reardon, and Michael Shahnasarian. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Three Computer-Assisted Career Guidance Systems on College Students' Career Decision Making Processes. Florida State University Libraries, December 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.17125/fsu.1525882239.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Chu, Joyce, Alya Reeve, Nicole Milan, Zhen Zhao, Melissa Moore, Robert Wickham, and Al Gilbert. Researching the Effectiveness of a Decision Support Tool for Adult Consumers With Mental Health Needs and Their Care Managers. Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), February 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.25302/2.2019.ce.12114309.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Rieger, Oya Y., Roger Schonfeld, and Liam Sweeney. The Effectiveness and Durability of Digital Preservation and Curation Systems. Ithaka S+R, July 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.18665/sr.316990.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In August 2020, with funding from the Institute of Library and Museum Services (IMLS), Ithaka S+R launched an 18-month research project to examine and assess the sustainability of these third-party digital preservation systems. In addition to a broad examination of the landscape, we more closely studied eight systems: APTrust, Archivematica, Arkivum, Islandora, LIBNOVA, MetaArchive, Samvera and Preservica. Specifically, we assessed what works well and the challenges and risk factors these systems face in their ability to continue to successfully serve their mission and the needs of the market. In scoping this project and selecting these organizations, we intentionally included a combination of profit-seeking and not-for-profit initiatives, focusing on third-party preservation platforms rather than programmatic preservation. Because so many heritage organizations pursue the preservation imperative for their collections with increasingly limited resources, we examine not only the sustainability of the providers but also the decision-making processes of heritage organizations and the challenges they face in working with the providers.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

McAleer, Pete. Warfighting is for the Warriors? How the U.S. Military Can Ensure Effectiveness Despite the Participation of Political Leadership in Operational Decision-Making. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, May 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada470782.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії