Готові списки джерел за темами / Copyright Moral rights Australia

Зміст

Статті в журналах
Дисертації
Книги
Частини книг
Тези доповідей конференцій

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Copyright Moral rights Australia"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021

Оновлено: 31 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Copyright Moral rights Australia".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Copyright Moral rights Australia"

Cantatore, Francina, and Jane Johnston. "Moral Rights: Exploring the Myths, Meanings and Misunderstandings in Australian Copyright Law." Deakin Law Review 21, no. 1 (February 23, 2018): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2016vol21no1art727.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article examines how moral rights are treated in Australian publishing contracts, and whether this approach is consistent with the expectations of authors, journalists and academics. Although, in theory, moral rights cannot be sold or assigned in Australia, the apparent wide scope for exceptions raises questions of whether there is any real protection afforded to creators under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), notably in circumstances that relate to pressure on creators to accept contractual terms in order to get published. Additionally, Australian case law reflects some uncertainty about the traditionally accepted non-economic nature of moral rights. The article examines recent case law in this field, found in Meskenas, Perez and Corby, and considers the literature associated with development of moral rights in Australia. It then presents the findings of a two-part study of moral rights in Australia; first through the results of interviews with 176 Australian authors, journalists and academics, followed by an analysis of 20 publishing contracts. It concludes that — in some, but not all, instances — a combination of the exceptions allowed under the Act and practical exigencies have diluted the unique character of authors’ moral rights and have created an environment of uncertainty.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

McCutcheon, Jani. "The Honour of the Dead – the Moral Right of Integrity Post-Mortem." Federal Law Review 42, no. 3 (September 2014): 485–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.22145/flr.42.3.3.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Can the honour of the dead be prejudiced? There is much philosophical debate about whether the dead can, or should, enjoy legal rights. Australia, like many jurisdictions, has apparently bypassed that debate and confers post-mortem moral rights on authors, which endure for at least 70 years after an author's death. The Australian moral right of integrity protects authors from certain conduct in relation to their copyright works, which is prejudicial to their honour or reputation. This deliberate conferral of a posthumous right ostensibly acknowledges that a deceased author's honour can be harmed. This article examines questions surrounding the apparent conundrum of posthumous prejudice to an author's honour. How can prejudice to the honour of the dead be established in the absence of the author, particularly if honour is interpreted subjectively? Do insuperable evidentiary hurdles render the posthumous honour limb of the moral right of integrity illusory? The article concentrates on Australian law, but engages in relevant comparative treatments, particularly with French, Canadian and United Kingdom law. Judicial consideration of moral rights under the common law is scant, particularly in Australia, and rarer still in a post-mortem context. However, the issues explored in the article are important, will inevitably arise for consideration and merit a comprehensive examination.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Rimmer, Matthew. "The Grey Album: Copyright Law and Digital Sampling." Media International Australia 114, no. 1 (February 2005): 40–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x0511400106.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In the field of digital sampling, disk jockeys have shown a recent enthusiasm for ‘mash-ups’ — new compositions created by combining the rhythm tracks of one song and the vocal track of another. Most famously of all, DJ Danger Mouse remixed the vocals from Jay-Z's The Black Album and the Beatles' White Album and called his creation The Grey Album. The Grey Album poses a number of difficult issues regarding copyright law and digital sampling. Does such a ‘mash-up’ go beyond the de minimis use of a copyright work? Is The Grey Album protected by the defence of fair use under copyright law because it provides a transformative use of copyright works? Can such remixes by compulsorily licensed? Does a ‘mash-up’ raise issues concerning the moral rights of attribution and integrity, which are recognised in Europe and Australia?

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Potter, Wellett. "Music Mash-Ups: The Current Australian Copyright Implications, Moral Rights and Fair Dealing in the Remix Era." Deakin Law Review 17, no. 2 (February 1, 2013): 349. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no2art84.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article discusses the likely Australian copyright implications of an increasingly popular form of digital music expression: the music mash-up, a majority of which are created from pre-existing audio/sound recordings and video without permission of the copyright owner. In examining this issue, the analysis of the courts in the recent Larrikin music copyright infringement cases are examined. Consideration of the implications of music mash-up creation to moral rights is also considered. In the hypothetical scenario that a music mash-up artist is accused of copyright infringement, consideration is given as to the likely outcome of the application of the fair dealing exceptions under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth). Finally, a suggestion is made as to the direction of future law reform in this area.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Yu, Peter K. "Moral Rights 2.0." 2013 Fall Intellectual Property Symposium Articles 1, no. 4 (March 2014): 873–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/lr.v1.i4.3.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

When the protection of moral rights is brought up in the United States, commentators have always emphasized the differences between continental Europe and the United States.2 Cases that have been widely used as textbook illustrations include Soc. Le Chant de Monde v. Soc. Fox Europe3 and Turner Entertainment Co. v. Huston.4 While the Anglo-American copyright regime and the French author’s right (droit d’auteur) regime were quite similar in the eighteenth century, 5 the protection of moral rights did not attain formal international recognition until 1928.6 The gap between the U.S. and French systems has also grown considerably since the enactment of the 1909 U.S. Copyright Act.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Puspasari, Anastasia Theresia. "Tinjauan Konsep Hak Eksklusif dalam Hak Cipta Berdasarkan Teori Hegel." Dialogia Iuridica 13, no. 2 (April 28, 2022): 140–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.28932/di.v13i2.4577.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Copyright is a protection in a form of an exclusive right which is attached with the creator, including moral rights which are possessed by the creator for the embodiment for their personality in the creation. The referred moral rights are recognized in the international treaties, specifically in Berne Convention and TRIPS Agreement, which put forward the moral rights as a copyright protection. The protection of moral rights evolved from the Continental Europe countries, which recognizes author’s rights. The principle of moral rights could be analyzed with Hegel’s theory from the writing in his book entitled “Philosophy of Rights”, postulating the principle of how a person could claim his right of property possessions. In accordance with Hegel’s theory, this research will be focused on the scope of copyright as an exclusive right, which will also analyze the copyright law of Indonesia regulated in Law Number 28/2014. The copyright protection regarding moral rights in Law Number 28/2014 principally regulates the right given to the creator to signify their identities in their creation or to claim for their creation which adheres with their personalities. Moral rights are also given to performers in the form of related rights, as a right for the performers to claim the performance of the creation.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Gultom, Hosiana Daniel Adrian, Ellora Sukardi, and Serlly Waileruny. "Kajian Terhadap Hak Eksklusif Atas Jingle Dari Perspektif Hak Cipta Dan Merek." Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, no. 2 (December 25, 2021): 135–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v5i2.3978.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Jingle is included in the category of creation in the form of songs or music under copyright law and is included in the type of sound mark in trademark law. Therefor there is a double legal protection for the jingle, namely copyright and trademark. Copyright law protection uses a declarative system while trademark law protection uses a constitutive system. In copyright law and trademark law there are exclusive rights, namely rights granted by the state to the rightful owner. Exclusive rights in copyright are moral rights and economic rights while exclusive rights in trademarks are called trademark rights. With the existence of moral rights and economic rights in the context of copyright law and rights to trademarks in the context of trademark law, various privileges arise for the owner of the jingle. These features are reviewed by the author in this paper with the aim that the jingle owner can understand the moral rights and economic rights in the copyright law system and the rights to trademarks in the trademark legal system that are related to the jingle in a precise and comprehensive manner.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Suka Asih K.Tus, Desyanti. "HAK EKONOMI DAN HAK MORAL KARYA CIPTA POTRET DI SOSIAL MEDIA." VYAVAHARA DUTA 14, no. 1 (September 19, 2019): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.25078/vd.v14i1.1099.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

<p>Copyright is an exclusive right which contains economic rights and moral rights. Portrait is part of a protected creation. In a portrait that is distributed offline or online through social media, namely economic rights and moral rights that must be presented and adhered to by users. Copyright infragement that still occur for portraits on social media are related to violations of economic and moral rights. The use of portraits on social media without permission for commercial purposes is a form of violation of economic rights. While the form of violations of moral rights over portraits is not to include the creator or source of portraits used in social media. The regulation and protection of economic and moral rights of portraits on social media are regulated in the Copyright Law. Economic rights are stipulated in Article 12 to Article 15. Moral rights are stipulated in Article 5 to Article 7.</p>

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Sundara Rajan, Mira T. "Moral rights: the future of copyright law?" Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 14, no. 4 (January 31, 2019): 257–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz008.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Seadle, Michael. "Copyright in the networked world: moral rights." Library Hi Tech 20, no. 1 (March 2002): 124–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/07378830210733990.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Copyright Moral rights Australia"

O'Neill, P. B. "Moral rights in Australia : the case for legislative protection." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1997. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/36895/1/36895_O%27Neill_1997.pdf.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

'Moral rights' should not be thought of as a system of ethical or moral principles, rather, they are personal rights of the author of a literary, artistic, musical or like work which proponents of moral rights protection argue arise from the intimate bond between the author of such a work and the work itself. Focus in the common law countries has always been on the economic rights associated with a copyright work and how those economic rights could be best protected and exploited by the copyright owner: 'The common law, however, has always placed more emphasis on the preservation of property interests than on some intangible concept like personality rights which are difficult to calculate in economic terms. The common law has always been more utilitarian and pragmatic in nature than its European counterparts. The legal rights of individuals are protected negatively - that is, you have a compensatory remedy rather than rights per se. ' 1 Within the Australian legal system the economic rights are the exclusive rights contained in section 31 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) and include the right to reproduce the work, publish the work, make a broadcast, make an adaptation of the work (among others). The focus on economic rights is reflected in the ultimate form which the Copyright Act has taken in Australia. That is, the Act affords substantial opportunities to the copyright owner to exploit the work with concomitant protection of those economic or pecuniary rights. By contrast, however, there is minimal protection offered to any moral or personal rights that the original creator of the work may claim to possess. For many moral rights advocates, the call for legislative protection of moral rights has been premised on the basis that a balance between economic rights and moral rights does not currently exist within the copyright field. The opponents of legislative protection allege that the introduction of moral rights would unduly upset the current system, posing threatening implications for investors in the culture industries. 2 This is the environment in Australia in which the moral rights debate has developed. Initially moral rights were seen as being essentially a foreign or alien concept to the system of copyright law in Australia. The past twenty years has seen an increasing focus upon moral rights by the artistic industries, legal academics, the Copyright Law Review Committee and various government bodies. Moral rights have been given some form of recognition and protection in over sixty countries in the world. Even the well-spring of Australian law, that being the English legal system, has enacted legislation which not only recognises moral rights but provides protection for these rights. In addition, other countries with a common law heritage such as Canada, New Zealand, India, South Africa and Nigeria have similarly enacted some form of protection for moral rights.3 Despite this, Australia since becoming a member State of the Berne Convention in 1928 has consistently refused to enact laws which specifically recognise moral rights and provide legislative protection for these rights. Despite the change in views of countries such as New Zealand4 and the United Kingdom5 , Australia has remained somewhat isolationist in its persistence in refusing to provide specific protection for moral rights. It appears, however, that the winds of change have been gaining increasing force in Australia, particularly within the last five years. This dissertation will define and analyse the concept of 'moral rights'. The nature of moral rights, including the rights of attribution, the right of integrity, the right of divulgation (disclosure) and the right of withdrawal, will be considered. The history of the moral rights debate in Australia will be discussed including Australia's obligations as a member of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works ("the Berne Convention") will be considered. The experience of other common law jurisdictions in recognising moral rights and the means adopted to protect moral rights and the efficacy of the means of protection selected will also be examined. This paper will focus upon the question whether moral rights are sufficiently protected within the Australian legal system by the present framework of various common law causes of action and statutory provisions contained in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) and the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and the various State Fair Trading Acts.6 The case for and against greater recognition and protection of moral rights will be examined. In 1994 the AttorneyGeneral's Department published a discussion paper which recommended the introduction of specific moral rights protection in Australia via amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).7 The recommendations of the Discussion Paper will be considered as will recent developments in the moral rights debate in Australia. This paper concludes that there has been insufficient recognition and protection of moral rights within the Australian legal system. The combination of common law causes of action and statutory provisions in the Australian legal system, in the absence of specific legislative provisions protecting moral rights, are not sufficient to comply with Australia's treaty obligations under Article 6bis of the Berne Convention. There is an unmet need for greater recognition and protection of moral rights within the Australian legal system and this paper recommends this occur via amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) to incorporate specific provisions protecting moral rights.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Rimmer, Matthew Rhys. "The pirate bazaar the social life of copyright law." View electronic text, 2001. http://eprints.anu.edu.au/documents/disk0/00/00/08/14/index.html.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Available via the Australian National University Library Electronic Pre and Post Print Repository. Title from title screen (viewed Mar. 28, 2003) Includes bibliographical references. Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Banks, Catherine, and n/a. "Lost in Translation: A History of Moral Rights in Australian Law." Griffith University. Griffith Law School, 2005. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20061006.114720.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This thesis is a history of moral rights in Australian law. It traces the historical discourse about moral rights in Australian law and demonstrates how that discourse has shaped the meaning moral rights have come to assume in their current form under the current regime contained in the Copyright Amendment (Moral Rijghts) Act 2000. This history examines the reception and later production of a moral rights discourse in Australian law, and reveals that the historical discourse about Australian moral rights was dominated by the three themes; foreignness, international obligation and economic impact. I contend these three themes fundamentally shaped moral rights as they now appear in the moral rights regime. As the history unfolds, it will become clear that the moral rights regime was organised around a specific repertoire of arguments and imaginings, and it is this discourse that informs this thesis. My argument is pursued in three stages. Section One of the thesis provides the historical detail of the moral rights trajectory in Australian jurisprudence, and reveals, within that history, the emergence of three dominant themes, which are pursued in subsequent detail. In addition to the history, this section also provides detailed discussion of the legislative provisions in order to illustrate moral rights as a product of the history, and it highlights some of the shortcomings of the regime and provides some background for the case study in Section Two. Section Two of the thesis interrogates the structure of the moral rights regime by applying the Act's provisions to the case study of indigenous creators, thus providing a contemporary example of how these rights may work in practice, as the result of the historical discourse. Thus this section sets the scene for final part of the thesis, which delves further into the historical discourse. Section Part Three follows the themes of the moral rights debate as they emerged historically. Reconceptualizing the moral rights discourse in this way helps to explain why the debates about moral rights took a particular course and produced the outcomes it did. The starting point for these discussions is a detailed examination of the themes of foreignness, international obligation and economic impact, and follows these themes as they evolved chronologically. In particular, the discussion reveals that the debates about moral rights effectively fall into two eras. The first era (1928-1988) centred around the question of whether Australia should introduce moral rights and the debates about the appropriateness of the reception. At the commencement of the second era (1988-2000) the question shifted to what form moral rights should take. This then provides a backdrop with which to understand why specific discussions about moral rights were sidelined during the years of debates leading up to the legislation; in particular, the subject and the object; which form the fulcrum of a moral rights action. This is an essential part of the history because it explains why the subject and the object came to be imagined and constructed in such a narrow and limited way and clarifies why the moral rights provisions appear manifestly ineffective, particularly for indigenous creators and their communities. This thesis contributes to legal history in three important ways. First, it provides a detailed account of a discourse about moral rights in Australian law, and in doing so challenges the long held assumptions about their reception and production. Second, it highlights the importance of history to legal discourse. Just as regulatory regimes, institutions, and rules are integral to the law, so too are the informal practices, discourses and contexts on which they were based. Third, it reminds the reader that history is a signpost, and this history of moral rights demonstrates that the way this law was derived, imagined and constructed has significance for the social, cultural and legal context in which that process takes place.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Anderson, Jane Elizabeth Law Faculty of Law UNSW. "The production of indigenous knowledge in intellectual property law." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. School of Law, 2003. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/20491.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The thesis is an exploration of how indigenous knowledge has emerged as a subject within Australian intellectual property law. It uses the context of copyright law to illustrate this development. The work presents an analysis of the political, social and cultural intersections that influence legal possibilities and effect practical expectations of the law in this area. The dilemma of protecting indigenous knowledge resonates with tensions that characterise intellectual property as a whole. The metaphysical dimensions of intellectual property have always been insecure but these difficulties come to the fore with the identification of boundaries and markers that establish property in indigenous subject matter. While intellectual property law is always managing difference, the politics of law are more transparent when managing indigenous concerns. Rather than assume the naturalness of the category of indigenous knowledge within law, this work interrogates the politics of its construction precisely as a ???special??? category. Employing a multidisciplinary methodology, engaging theories of governmental rationality that draws upon the scholarship of Michel Foucault to appreciate strategies of managing and directing knowledge, the thesis considers how the politics of law is infused by cultural, political, bureaucratic and individual factors. Key elements in Australia that have pushed the law to consider expressions of indigenous knowledge in intellectual property can be located in changing political environments, governmental intervention through strategic reports, cultural sensitivity articulated in case law and innovative instances of individual agency. The intersection of these elements reveals a dynamic that exerts influence in the shape the law takes.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Kariyawasam, Kanchana. "Moral rights protection in a copyright system /." [St. Lucia, Qld.], 2001. http://www.library.uq.edu.au/pdfserve.php?image=thesisabs/absthe16318.pdf.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Bartholomew, Peter G. "Personal rights, property rights and Section 55(2) of the Copyright Act 1968 : a consideration of the adaptation right in the compulsory licensing scheme for recording of musical works." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1998. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/36898/1/36898_Digitised%20Thesis.pdf.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Almawla, Hanan Mohamed. "Moral rights in the conflict-of-laws : alternatives to the copyright qualifications." Thesis, Queen Mary, University of London, 2012. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/8730.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This thesis examines the intersection between authors' moral rights and conflict-of-laws. The research question has been triggered by two important, interlinked factors. The first is that the currently applicable choice-of-law rules to moral rights are the same as those applicable to copyright. The second concerns the fact that moral rights are different from copyright - both in their nature and in the interest they aim to protect. Since these two factors coincide, it is questionable whether it ought to be the case that moral rights are subjected to the same choice-of-law rules as are applicable to copyright. The thesis therefore aims to discover whether the currently applicable choice-oflaw rules available in the context of moral rights are suitable for achieving the goals and objectives of conflict-of-laws. In the course of this thesis, I evaluate the potential validity of detaching moral rights from copyright in conflict-oflaws and instead attaching it to the characterization model of general personality rights. The research question is mainly addressed from the perspective of Rome I and Rome II Regulations. However, as there is no EU harmonization concerning general personality rights in conflict-of-laws, the examination will be directed towards France and England as examples of civil and common law traditions. Moreover, reference will also be made to CLIP and ALI principles by reason of comparison.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Klein, Jeff. "Identity Protection: Copyright, Right of Publicity, and the Artist's Negative Voice." Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2014. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1395585265.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Gudaitė, Martyna. "Teisės į kūrinio neliečiamybę įgyvendinimo problemos." Master's thesis, Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), 2007. http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2006~D_20070105_093921-83127.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The topic of the paper is integrity right implementation problems. Author‘s right of integrity is on the list of international obligations since the beginning of the XIX century and has to be made available by all Berne convention members‘ national laws. However this International obligation only imlies a minimum standart for integrity right protection, thereby it‘s implementation issues are to be solved at national level. The goal of the paper is identification and analysis of integrity right implementation problems in modern states under the rule of law. Accordingly different legal regulation is one of the main issues of the topic. Establishing conflicts between authors and their work users, identifying persons of law in the integrity right is a great part of this paper. Consequently different sides of the conflick of interests are being elaborated, most frequent dispute cases and ways of solving them are being analised in the light of different legal regulation. His paper also contains legal tradicions of implementing integrity right in continential and common law countries that are being compared to each other, as well as different copyright laws in separate countries and court practice (lithuanian and foreign).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Loff, Beatrice. "Health and human rights : case studies in the potential contribution of a human rights framework to the analysis of health questions." Monash University, Dept. of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, 2004. http://arrow.monash.edu.au/hdl/1959.1/5291.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Copyright Moral rights Australia"

Sainsbury, Maree. Moral rights and their application in Australia. Sydney: Federation Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Dakin, Helen. Australia-US Free Trade Agreement amendments: A discussion paper. Strawberry Hills, NSW, Australia: Australian Copyright Council, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Authors, Society of. Copyright and moral rights. London: Society of Authors, 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Garnett, Kevin. Moral rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Morrison, Virginia. Moral rights bill: A discussion paper. Redfern, NSW: Australian Copyright Council, 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Morrison, Virginia. Moral rights bill: A discussion paper. Redfern, NSW: Australian Copyright Council, 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Authors, Society of. Quick guide 1: Copyright and moral rights. London: Society of Authors, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Newman, Simon T. McB. Moral rights and adaptation rights in phonograms: A report. [London]: Intellectual Property Institute, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Moral rights: Principles, practice and new technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Das droit moral in den Niederlanden. [Münster?: s.n.], 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Copyright Moral rights Australia"

McCutcheon, Jani. "Disability exceptions under Australian copyright and moral rights law." In International Perspectives on Disability Exceptions in Copyright Law and the Visual Arts, 123–37. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, [2020]: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429342677-14.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Hart, Tina, and Linda Fazzani. "Ownership and Duration of Copyright and Moral Rights." In Intellectual Property Law, 163–69. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-14129-6_19.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Hart, Tina, Simon Clark, and Linda Fazzani. "Ownership and duration of copyright, moral rights and artist’s resale right." In Intellectual Property Law, 211–19. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-06736-4_17.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Biles, David. "Human Rights in Correctional Organisations in Australia and Asia: Some Criminological Observations." In Human Rights and the Moral Responsibilities of Corporate and Public Sector Organisations, 189–203. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2361-8_11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Rosignoli, Stefano. "Author, Work and Trade: The Sociology of Samuel Beckett’s Texts in the Years of the Broadcasts for BBC Radio (1957–89). Copyright and Moral Rights." In Samuel Beckett and BBC Radio, 139–67. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-54265-6_7.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

"Areas related to copyright: moral rights, performers’ rights, artist’s resale rights, and other rights." In Australian Intellectual Property Law, 168–95. Cambridge University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108784443.012.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

"Moral Rights." In Copyright Made Easier, 298–306. Routledge, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203403594-16.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Sundara Rajan, Mira T. "Moral Rights in the International Copyright Regime." In Moral Rights, 227–81. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780195390315.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

"Copyright and Moral Rights." In Q&A Intellectual Property Law, 37–62. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315736853-11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

"Copyright and Moral Rights." In Q&A Intellectual Property Law, 57–86. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203130964-11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Copyright Moral rights Australia"

Hron, Igor. "Historical Traces of Moral Rights in Common Law." In Mezinárodní konference doktorských studentů oboru právní historie a římského práva. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0156-2022-5.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The paper aims to track the traces of moral rights in common law, since it is a usual misconception that common law system of copyright protection is incompatible with the moral rights and the rights were consequently adopted to formally satisfy the international legal framework. The paper firstly outlines the regulatory context in which the rights comparable to continental jurisdictions had the chance to be acknowledged. Then it proceeds to an analysis of doctrinal sources as well as case-law of the highest judicial authorities that have touched upon these questions and developed comparable solutions to the jurisdictions traditionally protecting moral rights.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Inglis, Iulia. "Specific protection of copyright and related rights." In Open Science in the Republic of Moldova National Scientific Conference, 2nd edition. Information Society Development Institute, Republic of Moldova, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.57066/sdrm22.11.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Legal protection regarding copyright and related rights is granted according to the legislation in force, and the legal norms regulate the relations that appear at the creation and capitalization of literary, artistic and scientific works (copyright), of interpretations, phonograms, videograms and broadcast programs (related rights), as well as other rights that are determined by intellectual activity. The principles of protection of copyright and related rights are based on the objective form of expression, originality, automatic protection, exclusivity of rights, freedom of creation and freedom of contract. The subject of copyright relations may be legal entities, both citizens of the Republic of Moldova and persons with foreign citizenship or stateless persons. The moral right of the author is inalienable: the right to paternity, the right to names, the right to respect the integrity of the work, the right to disclose the work, the right to withdraw the work. The successors of the copyright values, only the patrimonial rights, which can be transmitted to third parties. The registration of the object of copyright and / or related rights implies the completion and submission of the application to AGEPI, the payment of the state fee, the registration of the data regarding the registration in the State Register, the issuance of the registration certificate. From legal protection on copyright and related rights are excluded theories, scientific discoveries, procedures, methods of operation, mathematical concepts, inventions contained in a work, whatever the way of taking, explaining or expressing. Likewise, the protection of copyright related rights does not extend to administrative, political or judicial acts, nor to their official translations, state symbols and official state signs, folk expressions, news of the day and various facts that represent a simple information. Enforcement of copyright and related rights is ensured through civil, administrative and criminal protection. Violation of the rights recognized and guaranteed according to the legislation in force attracts civil, contravention or criminal liability.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Vaswani, Khusbu, and Christine S. T. Kansil. "Analysis of Legal Protection on the Moral Rights of Creators of Photographical Works Against the Use of Photographic Creations by others on Social Media “Instagram” Commercially Based on Law NO. 28 of 2014 on Copyright." In 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.201.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!