Готові списки джерел за темами / Copyright Australia

Зміст

  1. Статті в журналах
  2. Дисертації
  3. Книги
  4. Частини книг
  5. Тези доповідей конференцій

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Copyright Australia"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021
Оновлено: 26 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Copyright Australia".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Copyright Australia"

1

Tréguier, Lucie, and William van Caenegem. "Copyright, Art and Originality: Comparative and Policy Issues." Global Journal of Comparative Law 8, no. 2 (September 25, 2019): 95–127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2211906x-00802001.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article reviews the laws of France and of Australia in relation to artistic works copyright for useful articles. Australian law applies a different subsistence test to ‘applied art’ than to fine art, whereas French law makes no such distinction, applying the principle of ‘Unité de l’art’. The decision of the High Court of Australia in IceTV Pty Limited v Nine Network Australia Pty Limited [2009] 239 clr 458, which aligns the standard of originality more closely with that applied in European copyright law, invites reconsideration of the Australian approach in favour of a universal standard for all artistic works. A more contemporary understanding of what constitutes ‘art’ points in the same direction. In the result, there is no longer any need to apply a restrictive ‘artistic quality’ standard to works of applied art in Australia. Such an approach better aligns the tests of artistic copyright subsistence in different jurisdictions.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Moore, Christopher. "Creative Choices: Changes to Australian Copyright Law and the Future of the Public Domain." Media International Australia 114, no. 1 (February 2005): 71–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1329878x0511400109.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Changes to Australian copyright law introduced under the Australia–United States Free Trade Agreement will diminish the public domain, criminalise common copyright infringing practices and locally introduce significant portions of the controversial 1998 American Digital Millennium Copyright Act. This paper examines these imminent changes to Australian copyright law, with specific attention to the potential effects of the extended duration of copyright protection and the introduction of technological anti-circumvention measures. It argues that public domain-enhancing activities are crucial for sustaining cultural creativity and technological innovation, and discusses the potential role of the Creative Commons movement in establishing economically viable and legal alternatives to the current model of trade-oriented copyright reform.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Thampapillai, Dilan. "The Novel as Social Satire: 60 Years Later, The Wind Done Gone and the Limitations of Fair Use." Deakin Law Review 17, no. 2 (February 1, 2013): 425. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2012vol17no2art86.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The absence of the doctrine of fair use from Australian copyright law has been a bone of contention in Australia after the Australia-United States Free Trade Agreement (FTA). As the Australian government reformed the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) in the aftermath of the FTA it eschewed the option of adopting fair use. Instead, Australia chose to incorporate a version of fair use into its existing fair dealing framework. Accordingly, the Copyright Amendment Act 2006 (Cth) inserted ss 41A and 103AA into the Copyright Act. These provisions provide that a fair dealing with a copyright protected work does not constitute an infringement if it is done for the purposes of parody or satire. These provisions codify part of the ratio of the United States Supreme Court in the seminal case of Campbell v Acuff Rose Music. However, the parameters of these new provisions are unexplored and the sparse nature of fair dealing jurisprudence means that the true meaning of the provisions is unclear. Moreover, two cases from the United States, SunTrust Bank v Houghton Mifflin and Salinger v Colting, underline just how important it is to have legal rules that protect literary ‘re-writes’. Both cases involved authors using an original novel to ‘write back’ to the original author and the broader culture. ‘Writing back’ or the ‘re-write’ has a firm basis in literature. It adds something invaluable to our culture. The key question is whether our legal landscape can allow it to flourish. This paper examines the interaction between fair use and literary re-writes.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Sinnreich, Aram, Patricia Aufderheide, and Donte Newman. "Creative Action Under Two Copyright Regimes: Filmmaking and Visual Arts in Australia and the United States." Communication, Culture and Critique 13, no. 3 (June 10, 2020): 384–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa003.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract A comparison of the behaviors of two creative populations operating within cross-media environments in the United States and Australia tests the comparative effect of the two nations' legal environments on the range of creative expression and on costs of production in increasingly digitized production processes. The U.S. creators have access to the flexible and expansive exception of fair use, while Australian creators' ability to use third-party copyrighted content are far more constrained. While availability of copyright exceptions plays a crucial role, other factors including demographics, disciplinary norms, and social inequality may also be important in creative practices and professions.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Puri, K. "Copyright protection of software in Australia." Information & Communications Technology Law 1, no. 1 (January 1992): 79–114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13600834.1992.9965643.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Cantatore, Francina, and Jane Johnston. "Moral Rights: Exploring the Myths, Meanings and Misunderstandings in Australian Copyright Law." Deakin Law Review 21, no. 1 (February 23, 2018): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2016vol21no1art727.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article examines how moral rights are treated in Australian publishing contracts, and whether this approach is consistent with the expectations of authors, journalists and academics. Although, in theory, moral rights cannot be sold or assigned in Australia, the apparent wide scope for exceptions raises questions of whether there is any real protection afforded to creators under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), notably in circumstances that relate to pressure on creators to accept contractual terms in order to get published. Additionally, Australian case law reflects some uncertainty about the traditionally accepted non-economic nature of moral rights. The article examines recent case law in this field, found in Meskenas, Perez and Corby, and considers the literature associated with development of moral rights in Australia. It then presents the findings of a two-part study of moral rights in Australia; first through the results of interviews with 176 Australian authors, journalists and academics, followed by an analysis of 20 publishing contracts. It concludes that — in some, but not all, instances — a combination of the exceptions allowed under the Act and practical exigencies have diluted the unique character of authors’ moral rights and have created an environment of uncertainty.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Carson, Louise Caroline, and Kathryn Greenhill. "One hat or many? A comparison of two models for the Copyright Officer position in university libraries." Library and Information Research 39, no. 121 (December 22, 2015): 57–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/lirg659.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Statute law provides university libraries with a framework for copyright requirements, duties and privileges. In Australia, there are few guidelines or standards for university libraries about providing those copyright services that are not mandated by statute, such as copyright advice and compliance. There is little formally-shared knowledge about the non-statutory services provided by university library Copyright Officers. More information about this would benefit libraries reviewing or establishing these positions. This research uses survey and semi-structured face-to-face interviews with designated Copyright Officers in four Western Australian universities to document four aspects of their work. These four factors are interaction and support within the library and the institution; involvement in institutional copyright advice, involvement in institutional copyright compliance; and satisfaction with authority and resourcing. The survey and interviews revealed two different models for structuring the library Copyright Officer position; one model involving a part-time officer with responsibility only for copyright, and the other model involving a full-time officer who has only 5% of their duties involved in copyright with the remainder of the copyright duties being managed by a member of the university legal / governance office. Similarities were found between the activities of both models, such as the strategies involved in ensuring copyright compliance, and education and training sessions. There was agreement from all respondents that copyright compliance within their institution could be improved by an increase in the resources available to each position.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Bond, Catherine, Abi Paramaguru, and Graham Greenleaf. "Advance Australia Fair? The Copyright Reform Process." Journal of World Intellectual Property 10, no. 3-4 (July 2007): 284–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00324.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Ms. Poonam Pant, and Ms. Bhumika Sharma. "Liability of Internet Service Providers Across Various Countries: An Overview." Legal Research Development: An International Refereed e-Journal 4, no. 1 (September 30, 2019): 06–09. http://dx.doi.org/10.53724/lrd/v4n1.04.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The role of I.S.P. or Intermediary is very important for effective utilization of information technology. The liability of Intermediary or I.S.P. has gain immense importance at international level. Various countries have defined the liability of I.S.P. either in the form of copyright infringement or for the infringement of information technology. Australia was the first country to enact the legislation relating to the liability aspect of I.S.P. in the form of Copyright Act, 1968 making I.S.P. liable to disable the access to online services hosted outside Australia. Some safe harbors were also provided for I.S.P. as part of the Australia - United States Free Trade Agreement. The US provides for the liability of ISP in the form of Communications Decency Act, 1996, Digital Millennium Copyright Act,1998. Title II of the D.M.C.A. specifically deals with the issue of I.S.P. liability and also provides for the penalties for unauthorized access to a copyright work. As regarding the legislations of Canada, it does not specifically defines the liability of I.S.P., instead it provides safe harbor for those ISP’s providing any means for Internet access. I.S.P.’s are also protected for copyright infringement in Canada. In Singapore the liability of I.S.P. is regulated by the Internet class license and Internet code of Practice which requires the I.S.P. to abide by the conditions of license. I.S.P.’s are also restricted to make public access of those websites which contain offensive content harmful to national interest. Japan’s Copyright Act, 1970, The Provider Liability Limitation Law 2002 protects the I.S.P. against any kind of liability for Copyright infringement. UK enacted two legislations in form of Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 Digital Economy Act 2010 which imposes the obligations on ISP to notify the infringement to its subscribers, also liable to take technical measures to terminate the Internet services after reporting of infringement. The countries also make the provisions for the penalties for offences relating to the infringement of copyright or unauthorized access of information by various I.S.P.’s or Intermediaries. The quantum of punishment is differed in every country according to the nature of offence.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Alexander, Isabella, and Michael Fraser. "Copyright Reform in Australia: Asking the Right Questions." Journal of Media Law 6, no. 1 (July 11, 2014): 8–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/17577632.6.1.8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Copyright Australia"

1

Rimmer, Matthew Rhys. "The pirate bazaar the social life of copyright law." View electronic text, 2001. http://eprints.anu.edu.au/documents/disk0/00/00/08/14/index.html.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Available via the Australian National University Library Electronic Pre and Post Print Repository. Title from title screen (viewed Mar. 28, 2003) Includes bibliographical references. Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Bartholomew, Peter G. "Personal rights, property rights and Section 55(2) of the Copyright Act 1968 : a consideration of the adaptation right in the compulsory licensing scheme for recording of musical works." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1998. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/36898/1/36898_Digitised%20Thesis.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Lamlert, Wariya. "International uncertainty in the exceptions for individual use in copyright law : a comparative study of Australia and Thailand /." Canberra, 2007. http://erl.canberra.edu.au/public/adt-AUC20080912.140432/index.html.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

O'Neill, P. B. "Moral rights in Australia : the case for legislative protection." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 1997. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/36895/1/36895_O%27Neill_1997.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
'Moral rights' should not be thought of as a system of ethical or moral principles, rather, they are personal rights of the author of a literary, artistic, musical or like work which proponents of moral rights protection argue arise from the intimate bond between the author of such a work and the work itself. Focus in the common law countries has always been on the economic rights associated with a copyright work and how those economic rights could be best protected and exploited by the copyright owner: 'The common law, however, has always placed more emphasis on the preservation of property interests than on some intangible concept like personality rights which are difficult to calculate in economic terms. The common law has always been more utilitarian and pragmatic in nature than its European counterparts. The legal rights of individuals are protected negatively - that is, you have a compensatory remedy rather than rights per se. ' 1 Within the Australian legal system the economic rights are the exclusive rights contained in section 31 of the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) and include the right to reproduce the work, publish the work, make a broadcast, make an adaptation of the work (among others). The focus on economic rights is reflected in the ultimate form which the Copyright Act has taken in Australia. That is, the Act affords substantial opportunities to the copyright owner to exploit the work with concomitant protection of those economic or pecuniary rights. By contrast, however, there is minimal protection offered to any moral or personal rights that the original creator of the work may claim to possess. For many moral rights advocates, the call for legislative protection of moral rights has been premised on the basis that a balance between economic rights and moral rights does not currently exist within the copyright field. The opponents of legislative protection allege that the introduction of moral rights would unduly upset the current system, posing threatening implications for investors in the culture industries. 2 This is the environment in Australia in which the moral rights debate has developed. Initially moral rights were seen as being essentially a foreign or alien concept to the system of copyright law in Australia. The past twenty years has seen an increasing focus upon moral rights by the artistic industries, legal academics, the Copyright Law Review Committee and various government bodies. Moral rights have been given some form of recognition and protection in over sixty countries in the world. Even the well-spring of Australian law, that being the English legal system, has enacted legislation which not only recognises moral rights but provides protection for these rights. In addition, other countries with a common law heritage such as Canada, New Zealand, India, South Africa and Nigeria have similarly enacted some form of protection for moral rights.3 Despite this, Australia since becoming a member State of the Berne Convention in 1928 has consistently refused to enact laws which specifically recognise moral rights and provide legislative protection for these rights. Despite the change in views of countries such as New Zealand4 and the United Kingdom5 , Australia has remained somewhat isolationist in its persistence in refusing to provide specific protection for moral rights. It appears, however, that the winds of change have been gaining increasing force in Australia, particularly within the last five years. This dissertation will define and analyse the concept of 'moral rights'. The nature of moral rights, including the rights of attribution, the right of integrity, the right of divulgation (disclosure) and the right of withdrawal, will be considered. The history of the moral rights debate in Australia will be discussed including Australia's obligations as a member of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works ("the Berne Convention") will be considered. The experience of other common law jurisdictions in recognising moral rights and the means adopted to protect moral rights and the efficacy of the means of protection selected will also be examined. This paper will focus upon the question whether moral rights are sufficiently protected within the Australian legal system by the present framework of various common law causes of action and statutory provisions contained in the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) and the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) and the various State Fair Trading Acts.6 The case for and against greater recognition and protection of moral rights will be examined. In 1994 the Attorney­General's Department published a discussion paper which recommended the introduction of specific moral rights protection in Australia via amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth).7 The recommendations of the Discussion Paper will be considered as will recent developments in the moral rights debate in Australia. This paper concludes that there has been insufficient recognition and protection of moral rights within the Australian legal system. The combination of common law causes of action and statutory provisions in the Australian legal system, in the absence of specific legislative provisions protecting moral rights, are not sufficient to comply with Australia's treaty obligations under Article 6bis of the Berne Convention. There is an unmet need for greater recognition and protection of moral rights within the Australian legal system and this paper recommends this occur via amendments to the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) to incorporate specific provisions protecting moral rights.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Shay, Richard Michael. "Users' entitlements under the fair dealing exceptions to copyright." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/71691.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thesis (LLM)--Stellenbosch University, 2012.
Includes bibliography
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This thesis analyses current South African copyright law to ascertain the proper interpretation and application of the fair dealing provisions contained in the Copyright Act 98 of 1978. Copyright law ensures that authors’ works are not used without their consent, which they can grant subject to compensation or conditions attached to the use. Fair dealing exceptions allow the general public to use copyright works for certain purposes without the copyright owner’s consent and without paying compensation. These provisions are intended to balance copyright owners’ interests with the interest that members of the public have in using copyright works for socially beneficial purposes. These provisions typically allow the use of a copyright work for the purposes of research or private study, personal or private use, criticism and review, and news reporting. Unfortunately there is no South African case law concerning the fair dealing provisions, and the application of these exceptions remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the extent of application of the fair dealing exceptions to copyright infringement so that courts may be more willing to consider foreign and international law and in doing so develop South African intellectual property law. The social and economic policy considerations underlying the fair dealing exceptions are considered to determine their function. International conventions relating to copyright and neighbouring rights are examined, specifically the provisions allowing exceptions to copyright. The legislation and case law of Australia and the United Kingdom are analysed to determine the proper interpretation and application of these statutory defences. This knowledge is then used to inform South African law. The Copyright Act 98 of 1978 does not contain a fair dealing exception for parody and satire. Australian legislation does contain such an exception, and it is analysed in that context. An exception for parody is proposed for South African law, and the need for and application of this provision is considered. The constitutionality of the proposed exception is evaluated in terms of its impact on the constitutional property rights of copyright owners.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie tesis ondersoek Suid-Afrikaanse outeursreg om die behoorlike uitleg en toepassing van die “billike gebruik”-bepalings in die Wet op Outeursreg 98 van 1978 te bepaal. Outeursreg beskerm die werk van ʼn outeur teen ongemagtigde gebruik van haar intellektuele eiendom. Gebruik kan deur die outeur gemagtig word, òf teen vergoeding òf onderhewig aan bepaalde voorwaardes. Artikels 12-19B (die billike gebruik-bepalings) van die Wet op Outeursreg laat ander toe om sekere werke te gebruik sonder die toestemming van die eienaar van die werk en sonder om vergoeding te betaal. Die bepalings streef om ʼn balans te tref tussen die belange van die outeur en die belange van die publiek. ʼn Werk mag volgens hierdie bepalings tipies gebruik word vir die doeleindes van navorsing of private studie, persoonlike of private gebruik, beoordeling of resensie, of om nuus te rapporteer. Daar is tans geen Suid-Afrikaanse regspraak rakende hierdie uitsonderings nie, en hul toepassing is dus onseker. Hierdie tesis beoog om die werking van die billike gebruik-bepalings duidelik uiteen te sit om hoër gewilligheid in howe te skep om internasionale en buitelandse reg toe te pas, en sodoende Suid-Afrikaanse immateriële goederereg te ontwikkel. Die sosiale en ekonomiese beleidsoorwegings wat die bepalings ondersteun word geanaliseer om die doel daarvan te bepaal. Internasionale outeursreg-verdragte word bespreek om ʼn raamwerk vir die uitsonderings te skep. Wetgewing en regspraak van Australië en die Verenigde Koninkryk word ondersoek, en die kennis wat daar opgedoen word, word toegepas op die Suid-Afrikaanse bepalings. Die Wet op Outeursreg 98 van 1978 bevat geen uitsondering vir die doeleindes van parodie en satire nie. Die Australiese Wet op Outeursreg 63 van 1968 bevat wel so ʼn uitsondering, en dit word in hierdie verband beoordeel. ʼn Uitsondering vir parodie en satire word voorgestel en oorweeg in die konteks van Suid-Afrikaanse outeursreg. Die grondwetlikheid van die voorgestelde uitsondering word bepaal na aanleiding van die impak wat dit sal hê op outeurs se eiendomsreg.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Lamlert, Wariya, and n/a. "International Uncertainty in the Exceptions for Individual Use in Copyright Law: A Comparative Study of Australia and Thailand." University of Canberra. School of Law, 2007. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20080912.140432.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The exceptions for individual use give rise to interesting and fundamental concerns drawing both international and national attention. There is uncertainty in the application of the individual use exceptions both in the international copyright treaties, particularly the three-step test of the Berne Convention, and in the national copyright legislation. To have a better understanding of this concerns, this thesis aims to: investigate whether the exceptions for individual use can still maintain the balance of interests between the copyright holders and users; analyse the contribution that international copyright agreements and national copyright legislation may have made to assist in solving the conflict of interest between right holder countries and user countries in applying the exceptions for individual use; and conduct a comparative study of the application of the individual use exceptions in developed and developing countries. The understandings that are found within this study are informed by relevant literature and by analysis of the application of the individual use exceptions. The thesis examines the application of the individual use exceptions in the international copyright treaties, namely, the Berne Convention, the TRIPS Agreement, and the WIPO Copyright Treaty in order to determine the appropriate ?balance? between the rights of owners and users in the three-step test. To explore the uncertainty in the individual use exceptions at the national level, a comparative case study is made between the exceptions for individual use in Australia, a developed country, and Thailand, a developing country. The results of the study reveal three major answers. First, the exceptions for individual use are able to still maintain the balance of interest between right holders and users in the digital environment, if some amendments are made to keep pace with the digital environment. Secondly, to assist in the solution to the conflict of interest between right holder countries and user countries in applying the exceptions for individual use, the international copyright agreements can make a contribution by making some minor changes, mainly in the three-step test of the Berne Convention, and by continuing to provide special treatments for developing countries. Nationally, the contribution may be made by thoroughly protecting the right holders whilst also still allowing individual use by amending the copyright legislation to update to the digital age when necessary, enacting the relevant Acts, and establishing a collecting society. Finally, from the comparison of the application of the exceptions for individual use as well as problems found and solutions proposed in developed and developing countries, in which Australia and Thailand are used as case studies, the comparison of the application of the exceptions for individual use can be divided into four categories: fair use exceptions (Australian fair dealing and Thai private use exceptions), free use exceptions, licences (Australian statutory licences and Thai compulsory licence), and limitation of legislative individual use provisions. In addition, the problem of different interpretations of the exceptions for individual use, the problem of conformity in the application of the exceptions for individual use according to the real purpose of the three-step test, which exists in Thailand, and the problem of response to the digital environment are all used as the frame for the comparison of the problems found and proposed solutions. The findings of the study are significant as they can provide contributions to the copyright areas primarily in the legal aspect: amendment of the exceptions for individual use. In addition, they also contribute to the related aspect in the copyright areas: the economic aspect: the balance between developed and developing Countries; and the moral aspect: developing countries? development. In addition, the thesis proposes four useful recommendations to enable the balance of interest between the right holders and the users to be maintained: amendment of the wording in the three-step test of the Berne Convention, amendment of domestic copyright law and its exceptions for individual use, encouragement of the role of collective management organisations, and raising public awareness on the issue of copyright and its exceptions for individual use.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Forsyth, Guy, and N/A. "A minimalist sui generis legislative proposal for the application of common law principles to the protection of computer software." University of Canberra. Law, 1998. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20090714.142532.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis examines the development of copyright and patent protection in the United States, United Kingdom and Australia and proposes that intellectual property is not the correct mechanism for protecting computer software. Both copyright and patent protection are evaluated in relation to their application to protecting the various elements of software. The increased desire for patent protection of software in the United States has recently impacted the debate over the correct regime for intellectual property protection. There has also been a corresponding restriction in the application of copyright protection by the courts. Combined with an undercurrent of sui generis software legislation being advocated by academia this has lead to the situation where there is continuing uncertainty over which method of protection should be provided for software. It will be shown that copyright is inadequate for the protection of computer software and that it does not address the correct element requiring protection. Patents, by corollary, provide protection that is excessive. The socio-economic effects of patent protection will be shown to demonstrate that it is not a worthy successor or adjunct to copyright. While copyright has attempted to protect one aspect (source code) patents have attempted to protect another (functionality). The thesis identifies the fundamental flaws in the protection offered by both regimes and proposes that they are equally unsuitable for the protection of software. Software will be shown to possess a diverse array of elements that are largely indivisible if adequate protection is to be provided. It is proposed that software be considered as a new form of property, referred to as Binary property, which covers informational and information processing entities. Further, the existing common law principles should be applied to the aspects that are at the heart of the intellectual property protection dilemma. In reality the elements requiring protection in software are activities that wrongfully duplicate a work or replicate it to create clones. It will be shown that the common law principles of theft, trespass, breach of contract and passing-off are suitable for protecting developers from these infringements. It will also be contended that any legislative intervention should be limited so that a certain degree of replication is allowable where there is a benefit to society through technological advancement or enhancement through standardisation. As such the application of common law principles are applied in a minimalist legalistic environment. The minimalist approach takes the position that there should be minimal legislative intervention in the computer industry. It proposes that there should be legislative intervention to enable the existing common law to take account of computer technology and provide for its continuing impact on society that will accelerate into the next millennium. It further shows that the continuing development of computer technology will outpace intellectual property necessitating the recognition of computer software as a unique form of new property in existing jurisprudence. The application of existing common law principles of property and the reduction in the monopolistic nature of intellectual property will not only benefit the highly dynamic and creative international computer industry but it will also be in the best interests of the Australian software development industry.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Rynderman, Benjamin. "The licensing of new recorded music business models in Australia: Current practice, the barriers to entry and an investigation in to the need for legislative reform." Thesis, Queensland University of Technology, 2016. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/97527/4/Benjamin_Rynderman_Thesis.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis identifies Australia’s place in the worldwide recorded music industries and seeks the reasons behind the delays of launches in Australia of online music services. It concludes that while there is no clear cut answer to this question, there is considerable tension between the parties involved and a clear opportunity for the review of Australia’s copyright law. Constantly shifting and dynamic, the recorded music industries in Australia and worldwide have been in a state of flux since the turn of the millennium and the democratisation of music distribution.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Anderson, Jane Elizabeth Law Faculty of Law UNSW. "The production of indigenous knowledge in intellectual property law." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. School of Law, 2003. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/20491.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The thesis is an exploration of how indigenous knowledge has emerged as a subject within Australian intellectual property law. It uses the context of copyright law to illustrate this development. The work presents an analysis of the political, social and cultural intersections that influence legal possibilities and effect practical expectations of the law in this area. The dilemma of protecting indigenous knowledge resonates with tensions that characterise intellectual property as a whole. The metaphysical dimensions of intellectual property have always been insecure but these difficulties come to the fore with the identification of boundaries and markers that establish property in indigenous subject matter. While intellectual property law is always managing difference, the politics of law are more transparent when managing indigenous concerns. Rather than assume the naturalness of the category of indigenous knowledge within law, this work interrogates the politics of its construction precisely as a ???special??? category. Employing a multidisciplinary methodology, engaging theories of governmental rationality that draws upon the scholarship of Michel Foucault to appreciate strategies of managing and directing knowledge, the thesis considers how the politics of law is infused by cultural, political, bureaucratic and individual factors. Key elements in Australia that have pushed the law to consider expressions of indigenous knowledge in intellectual property can be located in changing political environments, governmental intervention through strategic reports, cultural sensitivity articulated in case law and innovative instances of individual agency. The intersection of these elements reveals a dynamic that exerts influence in the shape the law takes.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Mason, Renate Surveying &amp Spatial Information Systems Faculty of Engineering UNSW. "Developing Australian Spatial Data Policies - Existing Practices and Future Strategies." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Surveying and Spatial Information Systems, 2002. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/18646.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis investigates the problems associated with the development of Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDIs). The results of this investigation are used as input for the development of new spatial data policy strategies for individual organisations to enable an improved better facilitation of SDIs. Policy issues that need to be considered by an organisation when developing spatial data policies, were identified as being: SDI requirements; organisational issues; technical issues; Governmental/organisational duties; ownership/custodianship; privacy and confidentiality; legal liability, contracts and licences; Intellectual Property Law; economic analysis; data management; outreach, cooperation and political mandate; and users' choices, rights and obligations. In order to gain an understanding of current spatial data policy practices and to device new policy strategies a spatial data survey was conducted. This survey addressed the identified SDI problem areas. Some 6630 questionnaires were mailed out with more than 400 responses returned. These were reduced to 379 useful responses. Once analysed, the results were compared with the findings of the SDI investigation and used throughout the thesis. The results of the analysis to the spatial data survey are displayed in tables and graphs throughout Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 6 and in Appendix 2. The tables and graphs show the answers to the questions asked in the questionnaire as a percentage of the total number of respondents. The survey discovered that many organisations had no spatial data policies, nor individual policies on spatial data pricing and/or intellectual property protection. This thesis established that SDI requirements are not being met by many spatial data policies used by individual organisations. Hence, the thesis studied the spatial data policy issues that are involved when an organisation develops new policies with the aim to aid the development of SDIs. It uniquely established current Australian spatial data policy practices in the areas of spatial data quality, access, pricing, and legal issues to form the basis for future strategies. It reviewed the current knowledge of intellectual property law applied to spatial data and devised new approaches to deal with all the identified policy issues. Finally, the thesis defines spatial data policies that facilitate SDI development.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Книги з теми "Copyright Australia"

1

Council, Australian Copyright. Copyright in Australia. Milsons Point, N.S.W: Australian Copyright Council, 1989.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Copyright: Law and practice. Annandale, NSW: Federation Press, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Australia, National Library of. National Library of Australia copyright guidelines. Canberra: National Library of Australia, 1997.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Affairs, Australia Parliament House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional. Cracking down on copycats: Enforcement of copyright in Australia. [Canberra]: Parliament of Australia, 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Council, Australian Copyright, ed. Permissions & copyright clearances: A practical guide. Strawberry Hills, N.S.W: Australian Copyright Council, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Sainsbury, Maree. Moral rights and their application in Australia. Sydney: Federation Press, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Council, Australian Copyright, ed. Libraries: A copyright guide : a practical guide. [Redfern, N.S.W.]: Australian Copyright Council, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Australia, National Archives of. A nation's imagination: Australia's copyright records, 1854-1968. Canberra, ACT, Australia: National Archives of Australia, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Clark, E. Eugene. Cyber law in Australia. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Clark, E. Eugene. Cyber law in Australia. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Copyright Australia"

1

Christie, Andrew, and John Liddicoat. "Australia." In Balancing Copyright - A Survey of National Approaches, 97–118. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29596-6_4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Gething, Steven. "The Development of Copyright Offences in Australia." In Copyright Perspectives, 291–313. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15913-3_13.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Mendis, Dinusha Kishani. "An ‘Invitation’ to Copy? Case Studies from Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada." In Universities and Copyright Collecting Societies, 97–119. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-723-4_5.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Gilchrist, John. "Australia-US Copyright Relations: An Unhurried View of the Reciprocal Protection of Literary Works." In Copyright, Property and the Social Contract, 105–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95690-9_6.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Suzor, Nicolas, Rachel Choi, and Kylie Pappalardo. "Moments of Flux in Intermediary Liability for Copyright Infringement in Australia." In Global Governance of Intellectual Property in the 21st Century, 129–49. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31177-7_8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Pappalardo, Kylie, and Brian Fitzgerald. "Copyright, Fair Use and the Australian Constitution." In Copyright Perspectives, 125–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15913-3_8.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Li, Rita Yi Man, and Yi Lut Li. "Should We Abandon the Concept of Artistic Craftsmanship in the Copyright Act in Australia?" In Law, Economics and Finance of the Real Estate Market, 85–93. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54245-9_6.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Pappalardo, Kylie. "Duty and Control in Intermediary Copyright Liability: An Australian Perspective." In Copyright Perspectives, 241–59. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15913-3_11.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Foong, Cheryl. "Open Content Licensing of Public Sector Information and the Risk of Tortious Liability for Australian Governments." In Copyright Perspectives, 205–39. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15913-3_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Pappalardo, Kylie, and Carrick Brough. "Dead Cats in the Mail: Dallas Buyers Club and the Emergence of the User in Australian Intermediary Copyright Law." In Copyright, Property and the Social Contract, 241–64. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95690-9_12.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Copyright Australia"

1

"2011 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies [Copyright notice]." In 2011 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Australia). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/isgt-asia.2011.6166826.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Lučić, Sonja. "VEŠTAČKA INTELIGENCIJA I PATENTNO PRAVO." In XVIII Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xviiimajsko.479l.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Artificial intelligence is a field of technology that is developing intensively. Along with the development of artificial intelligence, the issue of its patent protection has become topical. Artificial intelligence systems are based on highly developed algorithms and mathematical models, phenomena with which patent law is traditionally in conflict. This issue is not just a national or European problem. There is also an intensive debate in the United States about the patentability of artificially intelligent systems. The author deals with the question of whether artificially intelligent systems can enjoy patent protection. The paper analyzes the case of "DABUS" which refers to an international patent application in which the artificially intelligent system DABUS is listed as the inventor. Numerous intellectual property offices around the world (eg American, British, German, Australian, EPO) have rejected such a patent application. On the other hand, the Federal Court of Australia has ruled that under the Australian Patent Act AI could be listed as the inventor. Recognition of AI as the inventor (not the owner) of inventions generated by artificial intelligence can have certain consequences, including in the field of copyright.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

"Copyright page." In 2006 Australian Communications Theory Workshop. IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ausctw.2006.1625240.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

"Copyright page." In 2009 Australian Communications Theory Workshop. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ausctw.2009.4805616.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

"Copyright page." In 2018 Australian Microwave Symposium (AMS). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ausms.2018.8347000.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

"Australian Software Engineering Conference - Copyright." In Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC'06). IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aswec.2006.14.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

"Copyright Page." In 2004 Australian Software Engineering Conference. Proceedings. IEEE, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aswec.2004.1290445.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

"Copyright Page." In 2010 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aswec.2010.3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

"[Copyright notice]." In 2020 4th Australian Microwave Symposium (AMS). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ams48904.2020.9059476.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

"Copyright page." In 2014 4th Australian Control Conference (AUCC). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aucc.2014.7358711.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Copyright Australia" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах Дисертації Книги
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії