Готові списки джерел за темами / American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 26 липня 2024

Оновлено: 28 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law"

Bush, Darren. "Book Review: American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law: Transportation Antitrust Handbook (ABA, 2014)." World Competition 38, Issue 3 (September 1, 2015): 464–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2015036.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Weber Waller, Spencer, and Jennifer Woods. "Antitrust Transitions." World Competition 32, Issue 2 (June 1, 2009): 189–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2009019.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Antitrust enforcement is entering a period of transition in the United States. The election of Barack Obama as President and his executive branch, regulatory, and judicial appointments will have important consequences for antitrust law and enforcement, although most observers believe that these changes will be relatively modest both substantively and in comparison to the matters of banking reform and economic stimulus. As part of that process of change, there has been no shortage of advice offered to first the Transition Team and now the Administration about how to handle competition policy going forward. Two of the more substantial efforts in this regard have come from well-established antitrust groups with very different perspectives and memberships. Both the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association and the American Antitrust Institute have offered sophisticated lengthy public advice to the new Administration on how best to proceed in the competition law field. The reports are very different in nature and reflect the different nature of the institutions that prepared them. This essay takes a brief look at the transition reports offered by each organization and the vision they would offer for the new Administration.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Richards, J. Douglas. "Book Review: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, Monopolization and Dominance Handbook (2011)." World Competition 35, Issue 4 (December 1, 2012): 709–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2012057.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Weber Waller, Spencer. "Book Review: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, Monograph 26, Electronic Commerce: Antitrust and Consumer Protection in the Information Age (2011)." World Competition 35, Issue 2 (June 1, 2012): 386. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/woco2012024.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Anon. "American Bar Association section of international law and practice. Recommendation and report." Journal of International Economic Law 2, no. 1 (March 1, 1999): 163–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiel/2.1.163.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Chauvin, L. Stanley. "Joint Luncheon with the Section of International Law and Practice of the American Bar Association." Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 83 (1989): 14–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0272503700074784.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Pearce, Russell G., and Amelia J. Uelmen. "Religious Lawyering's Second Wave." Journal of Law and Religion 21, no. 2 (2006): 269–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0748081400005609.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The recent three-hour program on “Professional Responsibility and the Religious Traditions” at the annual meeting of the American Association of Law Schools (“AALS”), sponsored by the Section on Professional Responsibility and co-sponsored by the Section on Law and Religion, represents a milepost in the history of the religious lawyering movement and offers a valuable opportunity to reflect on that history. In 1998, only eight years ago, one of us defined the religious lawyering movement as “an emerging force” in legal ethics. In that short time, the movement has expanded dramatically and has received greater attention within the academy and the bar. It has developed the first institutional vehicles for disseminating and promoting conversations about religious lawyering, both among lawyers of the same faith and among lawyers of different faith traditions. Now the religious lawyering movement is increasingly confronting more complex and more difficult religious, legal and ethical issues; and is extending the religious lawyering conversation internationally.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Falcao, Tatiana, Mariana Eguiarte, Bastiana Locurscio, and Lucas Moreno. "Utilizing Tax Incentives for Infrastructure Ventures in Latin America: A Case Study for Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico." Intertax 40, Issue 5 (May 1, 2012): 319–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/taxi2012036.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article is the result of a panel discussion between representatives from Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, at the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA)'s International Section 2011 Seasonal Meeting. The panel was given a case study and asked to analyse the general tax issues arising from a highway infrastructure project entered into by a fictitious US company ('Highways, Inc.') in one of the involved Latin American jurisdictions (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, or Mexico). Under the hypothesis, Highways, Inc. was to choose the appropriate investment vehicle (special purpose vehicle (SPV)), corporate structure, and capital structure. The SPV's tax obligations and tax incentives in the investment country were also analysed by the panel. The objective was to come up with potential barriers and incentives to invest in the four envisaged investment jurisdictions.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Lametti, David. "JOHN T. MASTERSON, JR., ED., INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARKS AND COPYRIGHTS: ENFORCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT (CHICAGO: SECTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND PRACTICE, AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, 2004)." Revue québécoise de droit international 17, no. 2 (2004): 295. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1069265ar.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Fellmeth, Robert C., Bridget Fogarty Gramme, and C. Christopher Hayes. "Cartel Control of Attorney Licensure and the Public Interest*." British Journal of American Legal Studies 8, no. 2 (December 1, 2019): 193–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bjals-2019-0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract The purpose of regulating any profession is to assure competent practitioners, particularly where its absence can cause irreparable harm. Regulatory “licensing” ideally achieves such assurance, while at the same time avoiding unnecessary supply constriction. The latter can mean much higher prices and an inadequate number of practitioners. Regrettably, the universal delegation to attorneys of the power to regulate themselves has led to a lose/lose system lacking protection from incompetent practice while also diminishing needed supply. The problem is manifest in four regulatory flaws: First, state bars—in combination with the American Bar Association—require four years of largely irrelevant higher education for law school entry. Most of this coursework commonly has nothing to do with law. Second, and related, these seven-years of mandatory higher education (that only the United States requires for attorney licensure) impose extraordinary costs. Those costs now reach from $190,000 to $380,000 in tuition and room and board per student—driven by shocking tuition levels lacking competitive check. Third, attorney training focuses almost entirely on a few traditional subjects, with little attention paid to the development of useful skills in most of the 24 disparate areas of actual practice (e.g., administrative, bankruptcy, corporate, criminal, family, taxation, et al.). And schools often pay scant attention to legislation, administrative proceedings, or the distinct areas of law that will be relevant to a student’s future practice. Fourth, state bars rely on supply-constricting bar examinations of questionable connection to competence assurance. In the largest state of California, the bar examination fails about 2/3 of its examinees. This system has fostered an opportunistic cottage industry of increasingly expensive preparatory courses that further raise the cost of becoming an attorney—even after 7 years of higher education. Meanwhile, the bars regulating attorneys in the respective states: a) Do not treat negligent acts as a normal basis for discipline (outside of extreme incapacity); b) Do not require malpractice insurance—effectively denying consumer remedies for negligence; c) Do not allow clients injured by malpractice to recover from “client security funds”; d) Do not require post-licensure “legal education” in the area of an attorney’s practice; e) Do not test attorneys in the area of practice relied upon by consumers—ever; and f) Respond to cost-effective, technology-centric solutions to legal problems not by regulation to assure consumer benefit, but by attempts to categorically foreclose them in favor of total reliance on often unavailable/expensive counsel. No area of state regulation has more openly violated federal antitrust law than has the legal profession. The United States Supreme Court held in 2015 that any state body controlled by “active market participants” in a profession regulated is not a sovereign entity for antitrust purposes without “active state supervision.” Yet four years later, attorneys continue to regulate themselves without such supervision, overlooking the threat of criminal felony and civil treble damage liability.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Книги з теми "American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law"

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. American Bar Association Section of Antitrust Law handbook. [Chicago?: The Section, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Committee on Civil Practice and Procedure., ed. Antitrust evidence handbook / [prepared by the Civil Practice and Procedure Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association]. 2nd ed. Chicago, Ill: American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Canada. Director of Investigation and Research. Canadian antitrust enforcement: Notes for an address to the Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee American Bar Association - Section of Antitrust Law. S.l: s.n, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

V, Hartwell Ray, Mugel Christopher J, Allen Joseph J, and American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee., eds. Handbook on antitrust grand jury investigations: A project of the Criminal Practice and Procedure Committee of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association. 2nd ed. [Chicago]: American Bar Association, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Task Force on the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. Report of the American Bar Association, Section of Antitrust Law, Task Force on the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. [Chicago, Ill.]: The Association, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law. Committee on Practice and Procedure., ed. Report of the Committee on Practice and Procedure in the trial of antitrust cases of the Section of Antitrust Law of the American Bar Association. [Chicago?: The Committee], 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law., ed. The Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Association presents Litigating "rule of reason" cases, the retrial: June 18-19, 1987, New York City. [Chicago, Ill.]: American Bar Association, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law., American Bar Association. Section of Corporation, Banking, and Business Law., and American Bar Association National Institute on Preventive Antitrust (1979 : New York, N.Y.), eds. American Bar Association National Institute on Preventive Antitrust. [Chicago, Ill: American Bar Association, 1994.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

American Bar Association. Section of Business Law., ed. Section of Business Law committee offerings: A prospectus. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association, Section of Business Law, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Canadian Bar Association. Competition Law Section. Conference. Competition law for the 21st century: Papers of the Canadian Bar Association Competition Law Section 1997 annual conference. Edited by Musgrove James B. Yonkers, NY: Juris Pub., 1998.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "American Bar Association. Section of Antitrust Law"

LaPiana, William P. "Reconciliation." In Logic And Experience, 148–67. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195079357.003.0008.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract As the twentieth century began, prospects for cooperation between the bar and law schools seemed dim. In 1900 thirty-five law schools organized the American Association of Law Schools (AALS) to give the academic world an organization separate from the American Bar Association’s legal education section. While the two organizations continued to meet together from 1900 until 1913, their relationship was not a happy one. The separation of the annual meetings was occasioned, according to the law teachers, by the older organization’s disregard for both legal educators and legal education. The last straw was the decision to move the date of the ABA’s meeting from August to October, a time particularly unpropitious for academics. The differences, however, encompassed more than a disagreement over a convenient time to meet. The nature of legal education still divided the bar and some professors. In fact, the professors themselves were divided, but the nature of those divisions shows that the Harvard model was on its way to triumph in academia, in part because it eventually helped bring the schools and the bar together.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!