Добірка наукової літератури з теми "160808 Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "160808 Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "160808 Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology"
Lynch, Michael. "Social Constructivism in Science and Technology Studies." Human Studies 39, no. 1 (March 2016): 101–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10746-016-9385-5.
Повний текст джерелаHeath, Christian, Hubert Knoblauch, and Paul Luff. "Technology and social interaction: the emergence of ‘workplace studies’." British Journal of Sociology 51, no. 2 (June 2000): 299–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00299.x.
Повний текст джерелаHess, David J. "Technology- and Product-Oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movement Studies and Science and Technology Studies." Science, Technology, & Human Values 30, no. 4 (October 2005): 515–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162243905276499.
Повний текст джерелаWoolgar, Steve. "The Turn to Technology in Social Studies of Science." Science, Technology, & Human Values 16, no. 1 (January 1991): 20–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399101600102.
Повний текст джерелаHess, David J. "Publics as Threats? Integrating Science and Technology Studies and Social Movement Studies." Science as Culture 24, no. 1 (December 24, 2014): 69–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.986319.
Повний текст джерелаStar, Susan Leigh. "Epilogue: Work and Practice in Social Studies of Science, Medicine, and Technology." Science, Technology, & Human Values 20, no. 4 (October 1995): 501–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399502000406.
Повний текст джерелаNguyen, Josef. "Make Magazine and the Social Reproduction of DIY Science and Technology." Cultural Politics 12, no. 2 (July 1, 2016): 233–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/17432197-3592124.
Повний текст джерелаDuke, Shaul A. "Classical sociology meets technology: Doing independent large-scope research." Current Sociology 66, no. 7 (April 21, 2017): 977–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392117702428.
Повний текст джерелаHoward, Christopher A. "Book review: Technology and Social Theory." Thesis Eleven 132, no. 1 (January 26, 2016): 118–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0725513615596401.
Повний текст джерелаKling, Rob. "Audiences, Narratives, and Human Values in Social Studies of Technology." Science, Technology, & Human Values 17, no. 3 (July 1992): 349–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399201700305.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "160808 Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology"
Kraal, Ben J. "Considering design for automatic speech recognition in use." Thesis, University of Canberra, 2006. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/16990/1/c16990.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаBilandzic, Ana. "New approaches to developing and commercialising IP from research in universities using open innovation." Thesis, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany, 2016. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/98400/1/thesis_ana.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаBacaksizlar, Nazmiye Gizem. "Understanding Social Movements through Simulations of Anger Contagion in Social Media." Thesis, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2019. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=13805848.
Повний текст джерелаThis dissertation investigates emotional contagion in social movements within social media platforms, such as Twitter. The main research question is: How does a protest behavior spread in social networks? The following sub-questions are: (a) What is the dynamic behind the anger contagion in online social networks? (b) What are the key variables for ensuring emotional spread? We gained access to Twitter data sets on protests in Charlotte, NC (2016) and Charlottesville, VA (2017). Although these two protests differ in their triggering points, they have similarities in their macro behaviors during the peak protest times. To understand the influence of anger spread among users, we extracted user mention networks from the data sets. Most of the mentioned users are influential ones, who have a significant number of followers. This shows that influential users occur as the highest in-degree nodes in the core of the networks, and a change in these nodes affects all connected public users/nodes. Then, we examined modularity measures quite high within users’ own communities. After implementing the networks, we ran experiments on the anger spread according to various theories with two main assumptions: (1) Anger is the triggering emotion for protests and (2) Twitter mentions affect distribution of influence in social networks. We found that user connections with directed links are essential for the spread of influence and anger; i.e., the angriest users are the most isolated ones with less number of followers, which signifies their low impact level in the network.
Antalffy, Nikó. "Antimonies of science studies: towards a critical theory of science and technology." Australia : Macquarie University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.14/27367.
Повний текст джерелаBibliography: p. 233-248.
Academic vessels: STS and HPS -- SSK : scientism as empirical relativism -- Latour and actor-network-theory -- Tensions and dilemmas in science studies -- Kuhn - paradigm of an uncritical turn -- Critical theory of technology: Andrew Feenberg -- Critical theory and science studies: Jürgen Habermas -- Concluding remarks: normativity and synthesis.
Science Studies is an interdisciplinary area of scholarship comprising two different traditions, the philosophical History and Philosophy of Science (HPS) and the sociological Science and Technology Studies (STS). The elementary tension between the two is based on their differing scholarly values, one based on philosophy, the other on sociology. This tension has been both animating the field of Science Studies and complicating its internal self-understanding. --This thesis sets out to reconstruct the main episodes in the history of Science Studies that have come to formulate competing constructions of the cultural value and meaning of science and technology. It tells a story of various failed efforts to resolve existing antimonies and suggests that the best way to grapple with the complexity of the issues at stake is to work towards establishing a common ground and dialogue between the rival disciplinary formations: HPS and STS. --First I examine two recent theories in Science Studies, Sociology of Scientific Knowledge (SSK) and Actor-Network Theory (ANT). Both of them are found to be inadequate as they share a distorted view of the HPS-STS divide and both try to colonise the sociology of science with the tools of HPS. The genesis of this colonizing impulse is then traced back to the Science Wars which again is underpinned by a lack of clarity about the HPS-STS relationship. This finding further highlights the responsibility of currently fashionable theories such as ANT that have contributed to this deficit of understanding and dialogue.
This same trend is then traced to the work of Thomas Kuhn. He is credited with moderate achievements but recent re-evaluations of his work point to his culpability in closing the field to critical possibilities, stifling the sociological side and giving rise to a distorted view of the HPS-STS relationship as seen in SSK and ANT. Now that the origins of the confused and politically divided state of Science Studies is understood, there is the urgent task of re-establishing a balance and dialogue between the HPS and the STS sides. --I use two important theoretical threads in critical theory of science and technology to bring clarity to the study of these interrelated yet culturally distinct practices. Firstly I look at the solid line of research established by Andrew Feenberg in the critical theory of technology that uses social constructivism to subvert the embedded values in the technical code and hence democratize technology. --Secondly I look at the work of Jürgen Habermas's formidable Critical Theory of science that sheds light on the basic human interests inside science and technology and establishes both the limits and extent to which social constructivism can be used to study them. --Together Feenberg and Habermas show the way forward for Science Studies, a way to establish a common ground that enables close scholarly dialogue between HPS and STS yet understands and maintains the critical difference between the philosophical and the sociological approaches that prevents them from being collapsed into one indistinguishable entity. Together they can restore the HPS-STS balance and through their shared emancipatory vision for society facilitate the bringing of science and technology into a democratic societal oversight, correcting the deficits and shortcomings of recent theories in the field of Science Studies.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
vii, 248 p
Leydesdorff, Loet. "A Sociological Theory of Communication The Self-Organization of the Knowledge-Based Society, pp. 1-25." Universal Publishers, Parkland, Florida, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/105836.
Повний текст джерелаSedumedi, Boitshoko Kaelo. "Organisational and industrial practice in the steel industry : a sociology of science study." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/50053.
Повний текст джерелаENGLISH ABSTRACT: The study investigated the nature of a steel production process in South Africa. The Iron and Steel Corporation of South Africa (Iscor) was analysed within various theoretical approaches within the sociology of science and technology. Iscor follows the production processes that are based on a particular paradigm practiced throughout the world by steel-making organisations. The study aims to unlock this paradigm by using specific theoretical (ANT, SCOT and SSR) and disciplinary (MOT) approaches. Each approach provides a unique analytical dimension to the study: the influence of various human and non-human actors, the influence of social pressures, the historical evolution of the current practices and the management of risk. The study explores how Iscor adheres to mainstream scientific work. Hence there is a focus on endogeneous approaches - "processes of technological change and their outcomes are part of what has to be explained and understood" (Rip et ai, 1995). It is also noted that the technologies are derived from practical experiences and processes of scientific research. There is an ongoing attempt to formulate an understanding between technical and social content of steel-making processes because automated plant machinery continue to replace manual labour. Finally, the study investigates how dominant steel-making technologies within lscor's Vanderbijlpark (VP) and Saldanah Bay (SB) plants have evolved to achieve a position of stability.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die studie het oorsake van die staal produksie proses in Suid Afrika geondersoek. Die Yster en Staal Korperasie van Suid Afrika (Yskor) was geanaliseer binne die verskillende teoretiese benaderings in die sosiologie van wetenskap en tegnologie. Yskor volg 'n produksie wat gebaseer is op 'n spesifieke paradigm wat deur alle staal vervaardigde organisasie wereld wyd gepraktiseer word. Die studie beoog om hierdie paradigm te ontbloot, deur spesifieke teoretiese (ANT, SCOT and SSR) en disiplinere (MOT) benaderings te gebruik. Elk van hierdie benaderings sal 'n unieke analiese demensie voortbring aan die studie: die invloed van verskillende menslike en nie-menslike aspekte, die invloed van sosiale druk, die geskiedkundige evolusie van die huidige praktyke en die bestuur van risikos. Die studie ondersoek hoe Yskor riglyne volg in die wetenskaplike veld. AI te mits is daar 'n mikpunt op endogeniese benadering - "tegnologiese prosese verandering en die resultate wat deel vorm van hoe die proses verduidelik word en verstandbaar moet wees" (Rip et al, 1995). Dis is dus duidelik dat die tegnologie verkry word deur praktiese ondervinding en wetenskappe navorsing prosese. Daar is voortdurend pogings om die verwantskap tussen tegniese en die sosiale inhoud van die staal vervaardigings prosese te formuleer, deurdat auto-matiese mashienerie all deurgans oorneem van werkers. Laastens die studie ondersoek hoe die dominante staal vervaardigde tegnologie binne in Yskor Vanderbijlpark (VP) en Saldanha Baai (SB) verander het om 'n stabiele stands poort te verkry.
Rutherford, Paul, and prpdsr@mail usyd edu au. "The Problem of Nature in Contemporary Social Theory." The Australian National University. Research School of Social Sciences, 2000. http://thesis.anu.edu.au./public/adt-ANU20011217.114840.
Повний текст джерелаWilkie, Alex. "User assemblages in design : an ethnographic study." Thesis, Goldsmiths College (University of London), 2010. http://research.gold.ac.uk/4710/.
Повний текст джерелаJackson, Sarah Marie. "Assessment of Implicit Attitudes Toward Women Faculty in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math." Wright State University / OhioLINK, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=wright1324269233.
Повний текст джерелаSugden, Christopher Michael Gordon. "The practical accomplishment of novelty in the UK patent system." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2011. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:2ef0fd06-dcd8-4b21-8ef8-ab914d8de15f.
Повний текст джерелаКниги з теми "160808 Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology"
Turnbull, David. Masons, tricksters, and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indeigenous knowledge. Australia: Harwood Academic, 2000.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMasons, tricksters and cartographers: Comparative studies in the sociology of scientific and indigenous knowledge. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic, 2000.
Знайти повний текст джерела1945-, Crowley D. J., and Heyer Paul 1946-, eds. Communication in history: Technology, culture, society. 2nd ed. White Plains, N.Y: Longman Publishers USA, 1995.
Знайти повний текст джерела1928-, Nakayama Shigeru, and Yoshioka Hitoshi 1953-, eds. Science, technology and society in contemporary Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Знайти повний текст джерелаCopp, Newton. Discovery, innovation, and risk: Case studies in science and technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1993.
Знайти повний текст джерелаNina, Lykke, ed. Cosmodolphins: Feminist cultural studies of technology, animals, and the sacred. London: Zed Books, 1999.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMonahan, John. Social science in law: Cases and materials. 4th ed. Westbury, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1998.
Знайти повний текст джерелаLaurens, Walker, ed. Social science in law: Cases and materials. Mineola, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1985.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMonahan, John. Social science in law: Cases and materials. 3rd ed. Westbury, N.Y: Foundation Press, 1994.
Знайти повний текст джерелаauthor, Walker Laurens, ed. Social science in law: Cases and materials. St. Paul, MN: Foundation Press, 2014.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "160808 Sociology and Social Studies of Science and Technology"
Frickel, Scott, and Florencia Arancibia. "Environmental Science and Technology Studies." In Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research, 457–76. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77712-8_22.
Повний текст джерелаWhitley, Richard. "The Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook: A Personal Retrospective." In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, 1–8. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4_1.
Повний текст джерелаRaimbault, Benjamin, and Pierre-Benoît Joly. "The Emergence of Technoscientific Fields and the New Political Sociology of Science." In Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 85–106. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61728-8_4.
Повний текст джерелаGreer, Scott. "Professions, Data, and Political Will: From the Pandemic Toward a Political Science with Public Health." In Integrating Science and Politics for Public Health, 33–57. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98985-9_3.
Повний текст джерелаGülker, Silke. "From ‘Science and Religion’ to ‘Transcendence in Science’, or: What We Can Learn from the (History of) Science and Technology Studies." In Science, Belief and Society, 103–26. Policy Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529206944.003.0006.
Повний текст джерелаVelikovsky, J. T. "The Holon/Parton Theory of the Unit of Culture (or the Meme, and Narreme)." In Technology Adoption and Social Issues, 1590–627. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5201-7.ch075.
Повний текст джерелаBonilla, Jesus Pedro Zamora, and Simone Centuori. "To Mine or Not to Mine?" In Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, 224–46. IGI Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7152-0.ch012.
Повний текст джерелаWright, Michelle F. "Cyberbullying." In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fifth Edition, 356–73. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch026.
Повний текст джерелаWright, Michelle F., and Bridgette D. Harper. "Cyberbullying." In Advances in Human and Social Aspects of Technology, 94–120. IGI Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4168-4.ch005.
Повний текст джерелаWright, Michelle F. "What Is Cyberbullying?" In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Fifth Edition, 374–86. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3479-3.ch027.
Повний текст джерела