Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Verdicts Australia"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Verdicts Australia".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Verdicts Australia"
Tidmarsh, Patrick, Gemma Hamilton, and Stefanie J. Sharman. "Changing Police Officers’ Attitudes in Sexual Offense Cases: A 12-Month Follow-Up Study." Criminal Justice and Behavior 47, no. 9 (May 17, 2020): 1176–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854820921201.
Повний текст джерелаTait, David. "Deliberating about terrorism: Prejudice and jury verdicts in a mock terrorism trial." Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology 44, no. 3 (December 2011): 387–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0004865811419067.
Повний текст джерелаFinnane, Mark. "‘Irresistible impulse’: historicizing a judicial innovation in Australian insanity jurisprudence." History of Psychiatry 23, no. 4 (November 19, 2012): 454–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957154x12450128.
Повний текст джерелаRae, Ian D. "False Start for the PhD in Australia." Historical Records of Australian Science 14, no. 2 (2002): 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/hr02009.
Повний текст джерелаSu, Jiunn-Yih, Vincent Yaofeng He, Steven Guthridge, and Sven Silburn. "The Impact of Hearing Impairment on the Life Trajectories of Aboriginal Children in Remote Australia: Protocol for the Hearing Loss in Kids Project." JMIR Research Protocols 9, no. 1 (January 15, 2020): e15464. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15464.
Повний текст джерелаWarner, Kate, Julia Davis, Caroline Spiranovic, Helen Cockburn, and Arie Freiberg. "Measuring jurors’ views on sentencing: Results from the second Australian jury sentencing study." Punishment & Society 19, no. 2 (August 1, 2016): 180–202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1462474516660697.
Повний текст джерелаGRAY, ANTHONY. "STANDARD OF PROOF, UNPREDICTABLE BEHAVIOUR AND THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA’S VERDICT ON PREVENTIVE DETENTION LAWS." Deakin Law Review 10, no. 1 (April 1, 2005): 177. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2005vol10no1art273.
Повний текст джерелаCooper, James, Ankush Chauhan, and Olivia Puchalski. "Thirsty for a Verdict: Australian Court Confirms That Dehydration Is Not an Accident Under Montreal Convention 1999." Air and Space Law 45, Issue 3 (June 1, 2020): 359–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aila2020043.
Повний текст джерелаGopalaswamy, Radha, Natarajan Ganesan, Kalamani Velmurugan, Vivekanandhan Aravindhan, and Selvakumar Subbian. "The Strange Case of BCG and COVID-19: The Verdict Is Still up in the Air." Vaccines 8, no. 4 (October 16, 2020): 612. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines8040612.
Повний текст джерелаMorgan, T., P. Jackson, L. McDonald, and J. Holtum. "Chemical ripeners increase early season sugar content in a range of sugarcane varieties." Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 58, no. 3 (2007): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ar06018.
Повний текст джерелаКниги з теми "Verdicts Australia"
First the verdict: The real story of the Building Industry Royal Commission. Annandale, N.S.W: Pluto Press, 2003.
Знайти повний текст джерелаPeople's Verdict: Adding Informed Citizen Voices to Public Decision-Making. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.
Знайти повний текст джерелаChwalisz, Claudia. People's Verdict: Adding Informed Citizen Voices to Public Decision-Making. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Verdicts Australia"
"far, far cry from the broad swathe beaten to the British market by soaps ranging from The Sullivans to Flying Doctors and from Prisoner: Cell Block H to Country Practice which preceded the Neighbours phenomenon there. “The accents” were constantly cited as a crucial point of resistance. KCOP: “People couldn’t understand the Australian accent” (Inouye 1992). WWOR: “We received some complaints about accents, but maybe that’s not the real issue” (Darby 1992). KCOP: “The actors are unknown, and it takes place in a country that few people know about” (Inouye 1992). WWOR: “One problem with anything from out of this country is making the transition from one country to the next. We’re all chauvinists, I guess. We want to see American actors in American stuff” (Leibert 1992). The tenor of these reflections in fact gainsays the New York Daily News’s own report five days prior to Neighbours’s first New York transmission: The program was test-marketed in both cities, and viewers were asked whether they prefer [sic] the original Australian version or the same plots with American actors. “All of them chose the Australian program over the US version,” Pinne said. It won’t hurt, he added, that a program from Australia will be perceived as “a little bit of exotica” without subtitles. (Alexander 1991: 23) The station’s verdict within three months was clearly less sanguine. Australian material did not stay the course, even as exotica. Two additional factors militated against Neighbours’s US success: scheduling, and the length of run required to build up a soap audience. Scheduling was a key factor of the US “mediascape” which contributed to the foundering of Neighbours. Schedule competition tends to squeeze the untried and unknown into the 9–5 time slots. Whatever its British track-record, the Australian soap had no chance of a network sale in the face of the American soaps already locked in mortal combat over the ratings. The best time for Neighbours on US television, between 6:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m., could be met no better by the independent stations. For the 6:00–8:00 p.m. period, when the networks run news, are the independents’ most competitive time slots, representing their best opportunity to attract viewers away from the networks – principally by rerunning network sitcoms such as The Cosby Show and Cheers. An untried foreign show, Neighbours simply would not, in executives’ views, have pleased advertisers enough; it was too great a risk. Even the 5:00–6:00 p.m. hour, which well suited Neighbours’s youth audience, was denied it in Los Angeles after its first month, with its ratings dropping from 4 per cent to 1 per cent as a consequence. Cristal lamented most the fourth factor contributing to Neighbours’s demise: the stations’ lack of perseverance with it, giving it only three-month runs either side of the States. This is the crucial respect in which public service broadcasting might have benefited it, by probably giving it a longer run. Until the late 1980s, when networks put on a daytime soap, they would." In To Be Continued..., 121. Routledge, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203131855-23.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Verdicts Australia"
Thomas, Rae, Anna Scott, Rebecca Sims, Louise Craig, Leigh-Anne Claase, Julia Lowe, Clare Heal, Leah Hardiman, and Paul Glasziou. "50 Womens’ verdicts on consequences and labelling of gestational diabetes: a community jury." In Preventing Overdiagnosis Abstracts, December 2019, Sydney, Australia. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2019-pod.63.
Повний текст джерела