Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Utilitarian moral reasoning".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
AGAR, NICHOLAS. "Moral Bioenhancement and the Utilitarian Catastrophe." Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24, no. 1 (December 4, 2014): 37–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180114000280.
Повний текст джерелаThomas, Bradley C., Katie E. Croft, and Daniel Tranel. "Harming Kin to Save Strangers: Further Evidence for Abnormally Utilitarian Moral Judgments after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23, no. 9 (September 2011): 2186–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21591.
Повний текст джерелаSerafimova, Silviya. "Moral Challenges for Bauer’s Project of a Two-level Utilitarian AMA." Balkan Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 2 (2022): 115–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/bjp202214215.
Повний текст джерелаMartin, Rose, Petko Kusev, Joseph Teal, Victoria Baranova, and Bruce Rigal. "Moral Decision Making: From Bentham to Veil of Ignorance via Perspective Taking Accessibility." Behavioral Sciences 11, no. 5 (May 1, 2021): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs11050066.
Повний текст джерелаAcevedo-Triana, César A., Juan Francisco Muñoz Olano, and Pablo Reyes. "Differences on Utilitarian and Moral Decision Between Male and Female." Pensamiento Psicológico 17, no. 1 (March 23, 2019): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi17-1.dumd.
Повний текст джерелаDobrijevic, Aleksandar. ""Critique of intuitive reason"." Filozofija i drustvo, no. 26 (2005): 179–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/fid0526179d.
Повний текст джерелаJaquet, François, and Florian Cova. "Beyond moral dilemmas: The role of reasoning in five categories of utilitarian judgment." Cognition 209 (April 2021): 104572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104572.
Повний текст джерелаHuang, Karen, Joshua D. Greene, and Max Bazerman. "Veil-of-ignorance reasoning favors the greater good." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 48 (November 12, 2019): 23989–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910125116.
Повний текст джерелаNemzer, E. A., and L. G. Borodina. "Features of Relationship between Moral Judgments and Mental Model (on the Example of Adults with ASD)." Psychology and Law 12, no. 1 (2022): 180–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.17759/psylaw.2022120114.
Повний текст джерелаHardin, Russell. "Deterrence and Moral Theory." Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 12 (1986): 161–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00455091.1986.10717158.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
Kuo, Chi-Ting, and 郭紀廷. "The study of college students’ moral reasoning on utilitarian v. justice dilemmas and exploration of its correlates." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/60442342944260221509.
Повний текст джерела國立臺南大學
教育學系測驗統計碩博士班
104
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of utilitarian v. justice scale, and assess the current status of the moral reasoning of students on utilitarian and justice dilemmas based on daily life scenarios. In addition, the consistency of moral judgments made from different standpoints including impartial and situated conditions will also be evaluated. Furthermore, the effect of different background variables on the scores of utilitarian v. justice scale will also be explored. The principle of utilitarianism is to maximize the collective utility so that the differences between benefits and costs are optimized. By contrast, the principle of justice emphasizes that the basic rights of individuals should be protected even in face of tremendous majority utility. The empirical data revealed that college students in general tend to be more utilitarian-oriented in terms of overall performance on the utilitarian v. justice scale. Whether subjects will make utilitarian or justice response may depend on the scale and amount of utility and the nature of basic rights involved in the dilemmas. Subjects tended to make more justice-oriented response when they are in the impartial or objective condition. In contrast, subjects tended to make more utilitarian-oriented response when they are situated in the standpoint of decision makers. Gender, education, partisan orientation, and engagement in civil activities were the important background variables which are significantly correlated with the scores on the utilitarian v. justice scale.
Книги з теми "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. Reason or Intuition? Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190609979.003.0003.
Повний текст джерелаBesson, Samantha. Human Rights in Relation. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198795957.003.0002.
Повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Utilitarian moral reasoning"
Gerrits, Jeroen. "Conflicting Modes of Moral Reasoning; The Case of 24." In 24 heures chrono, naissance du genre sécuritaire ? Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.53984/philoseries08299.
Повний текст джерелаSalvano-Pardieu, Veronique, Leïla Oubrahim, and Steve Kilpatrick. "Cognitive Structure of Moral Reasoning, Development, and Evolution With Age and Pathology." In Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, 30–57. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1811-3.ch002.
Повний текст джерелаPostema, Gerald J. "Publicity and the Development of Bentham’s Theory of Value." In Utility, Publicity, and Law, 72–93. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198793175.003.0004.
Повний текст джерелаFrunza, Ana. "Philosophical Grounding of Ethics Expertise." In Ethical Issues in Social Work Practice, 1–17. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3090-9.ch001.
Повний текст джерелаSverdlik, Steven. "Bentham’s Chapter IV." In Bentham's An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, C4—C4P62. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190089900.003.0005.
Повний текст джерела