Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / UN treaty bodies / Книги

Книги з теми "UN treaty bodies"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: UN treaty bodies.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 8 червня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-19 книг для дослідження на тему "UN treaty bodies".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Keller, Helen, and Geir Ulfstein, eds. UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139047593.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Ulfstein, Geir, Keller Helen, and Leena Grover. UN human rights treaty bodies: Law and legitimacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

O'Flaherty, Michael. Human rights and the UN: Practice before the treaty bodies. 2nd ed. The Hague: M. Nijhoff Publishers, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Michael, O'Flaherty. Human rights and the UN: Practice before the treaty bodies. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Joseph, Sarah. Seeking remedies for torture victims: A handbook on the individual complaints procedures of the UN treaty bodies. Geneva: World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

United Nations. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Advancing the implementation of human rights in the Pacific: Compilation of recommendations of the UN human rights treaty bodies to the countries of the Pacific. Suva, Fiji: OHCHR, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Vandenhole, Wouter. The Procedures Before the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Intersentia Uitgevers N V, 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

O'Flaherty, Michael. Human rights and the UN: Practice before the treaty bodies. London, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Vandenhole, Wouter. Non-Discrimination and Equality in the View of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies. Intersentia Uitgevers N V, 2005.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Bringing rights to bear: An analysis of the work of UN treaty monitoring bodies on reproductive and sexual rights. New York: Center for Reproductive Law and Policy (CRLP), 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Bruno, Simma, and Hernández Gleider I. Part I Conclusion of Treaties, 4 Legal Consequences of an Impermissible Reservation to a Human Rights Treaty: Where Do We Stand? Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588916.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Vienna Convention's regime on reservations is particularly unfit to cope with the specific characteristics of human rights treaties due to the very limited and particular role played by reciprocity and the ‘inward-targeted’ nature of the obligations stipulated in such instruments. Regional human rights courts and UN human rights treaty bodies have developed certain methods of monitoring the reservations practice of states parties to the respective instruments, but a central question has hitherto remained very controversial, namely that of the legal consequences of a reservation to a human rights treaty which is considered incompatible with that treaty's object and purpose and therefore impermissible. After many years of dealing with the topic of reservations, the UN International Law Commission has finally addressed this issue: Special Rapporteur Alain Pellet has proposed a solution which finds itself essentially in accord with the ‘severability’ doctrine advocated by the human rights community, reconciling this approach and the principle of treaty consent through the introduction of a presumption of severability of an invalid reservation from the body of a human rights treaty, to which the State making such a reservation will then remain bound in full. This chapter supports the Special Rapporteur's proposal, traces its development, and discusses both the advantages and the specific challenges posed by a presumption of severability.

12

VLEUGEL. Culture in the State Reporting Procedure of the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies: How the HRC, the CESCR and the CEDAWCee use human rights as a sword to Protect and Safeguard Culture, and as a Sheild to protect Against Harmful Culture. Intersentia Uitgevers N.V., 2020.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Dame Rosalyn, DBE, QC, Higgins, Webb Philippa, Akande Dapo, Sivakumaran Sandesh, and Sloan James. Part 2 The United Nations: What it is, 6 Subsidiary Organs. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808312.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This chapter discusses the UN’s subsidiary organs. Chapter III of the UN Charter identifies the six ‘principal organs’ of the UN and authorizes the establishment of ‘[s]uch subsidiary organs as may be found necessary’. Two elements are essential to an entity working as a UN subsidiary organ: (i) it must be created by, or under the authority of, a principal organ of the UN; and (ii) it must possess a level of independence from the principal organ by which it was created, or under whose authority it acts. The chapter covers the essential characteristics of a subsidiary organ; powers to establish subsidiary organs; the legal status of subsidiary organs; powers of subsidiary organs; the nature of the functioning of subsidiary organs; joint subsidiary organs; subsidiary organs functioning in a dual capacity; subsidiary organs and treaty bodies; subsidiary organs of the General Assembly; and subsidiary organs of the Security Council.

14

Dame Rosalyn, DBE, QC, Higgins, Webb Philippa, Akande Dapo, Sivakumaran Sandesh, and Sloan James. Part 3 The United Nations: What it Does, 22 Promotion and Protection of Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808312.003.0022.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The UN Charter contains several provisions on human rights. Indeed, one of the purposes of the UN is ‘[t]o achieve co-operation … in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion’. The promotion and protection of human rights is also spread throughout the UN system, from the General Assembly and Security Council in New York, to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and the Human Rights Council in Geneva, to field presences across the world. This chapter discusses the principal organs involved in the protection and promotion of human rights, including the Human Rights Council and Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Also covered are human rights treaties and treaty bodies, human rights conferences, and Geneva–New York relations.

15

Buga, Irina. A Systematic Analysis of Examples of Modification by Subsequent Practice. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198787822.003.0005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This chapter illustrates the treaty modifying potential of subsequent practice and customary law by means of a ‘repertoire’ of examples of practice spanning a wide range of legal fields, with a focus on major treaty regimes such as the UN Charter and the LOSC, and examples drawn from both within and outside the dispute settlement context, as well as within and outside the context of international organizations. The chapter systematically explores the modifying potential of subsequent practice in different contexts, facilitating identification and analysis of analogous cases. It combines and builds upon the analysis in the preceding chapters in order to derive—with the focus on international practice as such—guidelines that provide future reference points to better understand the modifying potential of subsequent practice, and examine the way in which modifications have been dealt with in the past, by dispute settlement bodies in particular.

16

Heiner, Bielefeldt, Ghanea Nazila, and Wiener Michael. Freedom of Religion or Belief. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198703983.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Violations of religious freedom and violence committed in the name of religion grab our attention on a daily basis. Freedom of religion or belief is a key human right: the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, numerous conventions, declarations, and soft law standards include specific provisions on freedom of religion or belief. The 1981 Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Intolerance and of Discrimination Based on Religion or Belief has been interpreted since 1986 by the mandate of the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief. Special Rapporteurs (for example those on racism, freedom of expression, minority issues, and cultural rights) and Treaty Bodies (for example the Human Rights Committee, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, and the Committee on the Rights of the Child) have also elaborated on freedom of religion or belief in the context of their respective mandates. This Commentary looks at the international provisions for the protection of freedom of religion or belief, considering how they are interpreted by various United Nations Special Procedures and Treaty Bodies. Structured around the thematic categories of the United Nations Special Rapporteur’s framework for communications, the Commentary analyses, for example, the limitations on the wearing of religious symbols and the situations of women, detainees, refugees, children, minorities, and migrants, through a combination of scholarly expertise and practical experience.

17

Murphy, Thérèse, and Amrei Müller. The United Nations Special Procedures. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190672676.003.0023.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This chapter examines the UN Special Procedures, a system of independent experts appointed to monitor and report on human rights violations and to advise and assist in promoting and protecting rights. It positions the Special Procedures as a “missing population,” neglected not just by proponents of global health but by human rights advocates too. This chapter sets out to counter this neglect by “peopling” human rights law. It does this by adding the Special Rapporteurs and others who make up the system of Special Procedures, positioning these experts as an essential supplement to the actors—courts, treaty bodies, non-governmental organizations, victims, and states—that dominate accounts of human rights law. Adding Special Procedures would help in particular to address the widespread failure to see human rights law as a deliberative and iterative process that draws in a range of actors.

18

de Beco, Gauthier. Disability in International Human Rights Law. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198824503.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This book examines what international human rights law has gained from the new elements in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons (CRPD). It explores how the CRPD is intricately bound up with other international instruments by studying the relationship between the Convention rights and those protected by other human rights treaties as well as the overall objectives of the UN. Using a social model lens on disability, the book shows how the Convention sheds new light on the very notion of human rights. In order to so, the book provides a theoretical framework which explicitly integrates disability into international human rights law. It explains how the CRPD challenges the legal subject by drawing attention to distinct forms of embodiment, before introducing the idea of the ‘dis-abled subject’ stemming from a recognition that all individuals encounter disability-related issues in the course of their lives. The book also examines how to apply this theoretical framework to a number of rights and highlights the consequences for the implementation of human rights treaties as a whole. It not only builds upon available literature straddling different fields, which include disability studies and legal and political theory, but also draws upon the recommendations of treaty bodies and reports of UN agencies as well as disabled people’s organisations. The book provides an agenda-setting analysis for all human rights experts by inviting them to appreciate the benefits of placing disabled people at the heart of international human rights law.

19

Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana, ed. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2019. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513552.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The 2019 edition of the Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence both updates readers on the important work of long-standing international tribunals and introduces readers to more novel topics in international law. The Yearbook continues to provide expert coverage of the Court of Justice of the European Union and diverse tribunals from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to criminal tribunals such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals (MICT), to international courts of human rights (ECtHR, IACtHR, ACtHPR), to economically based tribunals such as ICSID and the WTO Dispute Resolution panel. This edition contains original research articles on the development and analysis of the concept of global law and the views of the global law theorists such as: a judicial knowledge-sharing process as a tool for courts working together in a universal constitutional structure; the key insights emerging from the Global Environment Outlook-6, and the progress that has been made in international environmental law; the role of human rights treaty monitoring bodies in the international legal order; and an examination of the consequences of the UN Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration on international law. The Yearbook provides students, scholars, and practitioners alike a valuable combination of expert discussion and direct quotes from the court opinions to which that discussion relates, as well as an annual overview of the process of cross-fertilization between international courts and tribunals.