Статті в журналах: "UN Human rights convenants"

1

Vuksanovic, Mlrjana. "UN human rights council." Megatrend revija 11, no. 2 (2014): 295–322. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/megrev1402295v.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Cook, Rebecca J. "UN Human Rights Committees advance reproductive rights." Reproductive Health Matters 5, no. 10 (January 1997): 151–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0968-8080(97)90096-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Mamiński, Marcin. "Human Rights. Poland and the UN declarations on Human Rights." Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza. Prawo 31 (2020): 169–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/znurprawo.2020.31.13.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Human rights are the foundation of democracy, a democratic society, freedom, justice and peace. Without human rights and awareness of their ownership, people cannot live in dignity. Human rights are the same for all of us, regardless of race, gender, religion, ethnicity, political or other beliefs, social origin, national origin, sexual orientation. There are cases in which human rights may be limited, but only in very specific situations, usually defined in international documents or constitutions of individual countries (e.g. due to the protection of certain values by the state, or due to threats such as war or public security). In 1948, Poland was one of the eight states that abstained from voting on the ratification of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Until the transformation of the political system between 1989–1992, the number of international conventions dealing with the issue of human rights, which the Polish state had not ratified, has increased. Along with the democratization of public life in Poland and the accession process to the European Union, successive governments have signed certain conventions, but many important documents remain unratified or unimplemented, including significant conventions regarding the status of stateless persons or related to cluster munitions. This presentation aims at indication of the relation of Polish legislation and basic legal acts to the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights and subsequent conventions aimed at protecting those rights. On the basis of a short comparative analysis, I will try to indicate how important human rights are to Poland nowadays.

4

Tomlin, P. J., and A. Berlin. "UN Declaration of Human Rights." BMJ 316, no. 7136 (March 28, 1998): 1020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7136.1020.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Birchard, Karen. "UN expands human-rights team." Lancet 350, no. 9076 (August 1997): 500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)63097-8.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Thiele, Bret, and Mayra Gómez. "I Un Human Rights Council." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 27, no. 1 (March 2009): 61–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016934410902700105.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Thiele, Bret, and Mayra Gómez. "II Un Human Rights Council." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 27, no. 2 (June 2009): 250–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016934410902700206.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Thiele, Bret, and Mayra Gómez. "I Un Human Rights Council." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 27, no. 3 (September 2009): 391–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016934410902700304.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Thiele, Bret, and Mayra Gómez. "II Un Human Rights Council." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 27, no. 4 (December 2009): 584–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016934410902700406.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Subedi, Surya P. "China's Approach to Human Rights and the UN Human Rights Agenda." Chinese Journal of International Law 14, no. 3 (July 8, 2015): 437–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmv037.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Crook, John R. "UN Human Rights Officials Berate U.S. Human Rights Policies and Practices." American Journal of International Law 103, no. 3 (July 2009): 594–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s000293000075528x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Savaresi, Annalisa. "UN Human Rights Bodies and the UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights and Climate Change." Yearbook of International Disaster Law Online 4, no. 1 (April 13, 2023): 396–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/26662531_00401_019.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Uddin, Md Kamal. "Human Rights Violations by un Peacekeepers." Security and Human Rights 25, no. 1 (January 14, 2014): 130–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18750230-02501006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Peacekeeping Operation (pko) is significantly a worthwhile strategy for preservation and restoration of international peace and security. Promotion and protection of human rights in peacekeeping operations is a phenomenon and cannot be the only responsibility of the United Nations. However, as the most important actor of the international system, it has the primary responsibility to promote and protect human rights in peacekeeping operations because human rights issue has become very significant in the sense that unfortunately, in most cases, peacekeepers are involved in gross human rights violation in the course of operation that damage overall reputation of un. Hence, application and enforcement of international human rights law in peacekeeping operations are essential in order to shelter the civilian form attacks, torture, and other forms of human rights violations. This paper examines the un’s efforts to address human rights in pkos, and also targets to find out the actual scenario of human rights in pkos and proposes some policies.

14

Burnay, Matthieu, and Eva Pils. "Human Rights, China and the UN." Amicus Curiae 2, no. 2 (March 1, 2021): 244–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.14296/ac.v2i2.5256.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Weissbrodt, David. "UN Human Rights Norms for Business." International Law FORUM du droit international 7, no. 4 (2005): 290–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180405775268392.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Voss, M. Joel. "Contesting human rights and climate change at the UN Human Rights Council." Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 11, no. 1 (March 24, 2020): 6–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/jhre.2020.01.01.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Climate change is one of the defining problems of our time. The relationship between climate change and human rights is receiving increased attention by stakeholders, including the UN and its primary human rights body, the Human Rights Council. Discussions on the relationship between climate change and human rights are hotly contested. This article is concerned with how states advocate for or against climate change and human rights at the Council. Participant observation on climate change resolutions from 2006 to 2019 through the UN's webTV archives are used to illustrate how states frame climate change. Although passed without a vote, significant contestation occurs over the content of each resolution. During explanations of the vote, Member States make some form of three claims – using one of three dominant framings. The first focuses on equity and development. The second frames the relationship between human rights and climate change: climate change is either constructed as a problem undermining human rights or as generating a responsibility for states to protect human rights when responding to it. The final argument's framing revolves around the mandate of the Council to discuss climate change as a human right. This article helps shed light on theories of norm contestation and on the strategies and frames used in advocating for the relationship between human rights and climate change and its construction – and significance – in the UN Human Rights Council.

17

Gaer, Felice D. "Implementing international human rights norms: UN human rights treaty bodies and NGOs." Journal of Human Rights 2, no. 3 (September 2003): 339–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1475483032000133024.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Matiya, Jarvis. "Repositioning the international human rights protection system: the UN Human Rights Council." Commonwealth Law Bulletin 36, no. 2 (June 2010): 313–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03050718.2010.481399.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Terlingen, Yvonne. "The Human Rights Council: A New Era in UN Human Rights Work?" Ethics & International Affairs 21, no. 2 (2007): 167–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2007.00068.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Victor, MYKHAILOVSKYI. "INTERNATIONAL LEGAL MECHANISM FOR ENSURING HUMAN RIGHTS." Foreign trade: economics, finance, law 117, no. 4 (September 10, 2021): 26–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.31617/zt.knute.2021(117)03.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Background. The problem of protecting human rights has existed throughoutthe existence of mankind. Modern globalization affects the effectiveness of international institutions in the field of human rights. After all, the rapid processes of development and adoption of international documents in the field of human rights require not only worldwide recognition, but also unquestioning implementation. In this regard, the study of the mechanism for exercising the powers of the UN Human Rights Council in the temporarily occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas is especially relevant. The aim of the article is to establish a mechanism for exercising the powers of the UN Human Rights Council to respect and ensure human rights in Ukraine, in particular in the temporarily occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas. Materials and methods. Both general and special legal methods of cognition were used during the research. The normative basis of the study were international treaties, international law and the work of domestic and foreign scientists. Results. International protection of human rights is one of the most important branches of public international law. The creation of the United Nations has opened a new page in the field of human rights institutions. In order to promote and ensure human rights in Ukraine, in particular in the temporarily occupied territories of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Donbas, the UN Human Rights Council implements a number of mechanisms: closely cooperateswith the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. periodic inspections. The UN Human Rights Council serves as a forum for discussing thematic issues on all human rights. Thus, within the high-level segment of the UN Human Rights Council, on February 23, 2021, for the third year in a row, the UN General Assembly debated on the agenda item «Situation in the Temporarily Occupied Territories of Ukraine» initiated by our state. Within the framework of this event, support for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Ukraine was expressed. Conclusion. Ukraine’s cooperation with the UN Human Rights Council is increasing pressure from the international community to respect the rights of indigenous peoples, national minorities, social human rights, democracy and the rule of law. During the Russian aggression on the territory of Ukraine, the UN Human Rights Council adopted a resolution «Cooperation with Ukraine and its assistance in the field of human rights», an agreement was concluded between the Government of Ukraine and the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights. Ukraine. Thus, despite the recommendatory nature of the powers of the UN Human Rights Council, this international institution significantly affects the level of human rights in the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, and contributes to the further development of human rights in Ukraine. Keywords: human rights, UN Commission on Human Rights, UN HumanRights Council, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission.

21

Suthanthiraraj, Kavitha. "The UN Declaration of Human Rights at 70: Women’s Rights." Australian Journal of International Affairs 73, no. 4 (June 17, 2019): 331–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2019.1631253.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Possenti, Vittorio. "Human Rights and Human Nature." Tópicos, Revista de Filosofía 8, no. 1 (November 28, 2013): 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.21555/top.v8i1.476.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Parece que hay dos diferentes versiones de los derechos humanos en la tradición occidental: a saber, la racionalista y la cristiana; la primera adoptada por la revolución francesa, la última altamente desarrollada en el renacimiento español. Actuales críticas relativistas tratan de negar la universalidad de los derechos humanos alegando que es una teoría que ha sido creada por países occidentales o que no tiene una justificación fuerte, y que por tanto no puede tener un alcance universal; pero esta objeción puede ser descartada con una justificación alternativa de los derechos humanos.

23

BAEK, Buhm-suk, and Mi-hwa HONG. "Footprints of South Korean Human Rights Diplomacy in the UN Human Rights Mechanisms." Seoul International Law Jornal 29, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 19–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.18703/silj.2022.06.29.1.019.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Nowak, Manfred. "Proposals for Improving the UN Human Rights Programme." Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 11, no. 2 (June 1993): 153–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016934419301100202.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The second World Conference on Human Rights to be held in Vienna from 14 to 25 June 1993 has the chance of making use of the increased commitment to human rights, of many governments in both the North and the South for the goal of strengthening the UN human rights mechanisms by means of far-reaching reforms. In this article proposals are presented for improving the UN human rights program. The main features of the proposals are the transformation of the Trusteeship Council into a Human Rights Council with an overall mandate for the promotion, protection, prevention and enforcement of human rights; the establishment of a new Human Rights Commission, composed of independent experts, as the main UN body responsible for identifying future human rights violations and making recommendations to the Council for efficient preventive action. Situations of gross and systematic violations of human rights, identified as such by the Human Rights Council should in all cases be regarded as matters falling within the competence of the Security Council and requiring enforcement actions by that body. Other proposals concern a consolidated reporting procedure before an enlarged Human Rights Committee and the examination of individual and inter-State complaints by a UN Court of Human Rights. Furthermore, the creation of an International Criminal Court with a general jurisdiction for all crimes under international law and the establishment of a Special Commissioner for Human Rights is suggested. This Commissioner, in addition to carrying out human rights documentation, research, training and a development cooperation programme, should be entrusted with an independent mandate to initiate procedures for the prevention, protection and enforcement of human rights.

25

Murdie, Amanda. "R2P, Human Rights, and the Perils of a Bad Human Rights Intervention." Global Responsibility to Protect 9, no. 3 (August 6, 2017): 267–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875984x-00903004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article evaluates the effects certain interventions, namely various types of third party peacekeeping missions, have had on the future human rights practices of countries experiencing civil conflict. I argue that peacekeeping with (a) an un mandate or (b) a strong civilian or humanitarian focus are the only types of missions that should cause gains in human rights performance; these missions are aligned with R2P goals. Using a cross-national sample of countries experiencing civil conflict from 1960 to 2013, I find much evidence that R2P-aligned peacekeeping missions can be a positive force for future human rights performance within countries that have experienced civil conflict, even after we account for the factors that led to the mission in the first place. Advocacy efforts in support of R2P must be careful to call for only interventions with un support and/or clear humanitarian objectives.

26

Navoth, Michal. "From a UN Commission on Human Rights to a Human Rights Council: A Structural Change or Human Rights Reform?" Israel Journal of Foreign Affairs 1, no. 1 (January 2006): 112–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23739770.2006.11446246.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

James, Alan. "The UN Security Council and human rights." International Affairs 71, no. 3 (July 1995): 599–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2624856.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

S. Vershinin. "Russia's Human Rights Priorities at UN Agencies." International Affairs 67, no. 002 (April 30, 2021): 3–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.21557/iaf.67456386.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Gaer, Felice D. "Human Rights NGOs in UN Peace Operations." International Peacekeeping 10, no. 1 (March 2003): 73–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714002398.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Durham, Gillian. "UN human rights committees and public health." Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 24, no. 5 (October 2000): 463–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2000.tb00494.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Dillner, L. "Human rights group condemns UN in Rwanda." BMJ 309, no. 6959 (October 8, 1994): 895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6959.895.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Dinstein, Yoram. "Human Rights: Implementation through the UN System." Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting 89 (1995): 242–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s027250370008424x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Birchard, Karen. "Ireland's President takes UN human-rights post." Lancet 349, no. 9068 (June 1997): 1823. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(05)61713-8.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Foley, Conor. "The Human Rights Obligations of un Peacekeepers." Global Responsibility to Protect 8, no. 4 (October 26, 2016): 431–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/1875984x-00804007.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Over 100,000 un peacekeeping personnel are deployed on missions with authority from the Security Council, under Chapter vii of the un Charter, to use force to protect civilians. Nevertheless, they have repeatedly failed to do so and yet there does not appear to be a single case where the un has taken disciplinary action against senior staff for failing to act in line with a mission mandate in this regard. This article argues that the ´positive´ and ´negative´ obligations of international human rights law, protecting the right to life and physical integrity, provide the most appropriate guidance to the tactical use of force by un peacekeeping soldiers. Mechanisms also need to be created to improve the accountability of un missions to those that they are responsible for protecting.

35

Mégret, Frédéric. "Beyond UN Accountability for Human Rights Violations." International Organizations Law Review 16, no. 1 (January 7, 2019): 68–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01601004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The overarching focus on the United Nations and its agents for human rights violations and abuses they may have committed, as well as the attention to troop contributing states and even ‘victims’, has broadly shifted attention away from the role of the host state in peace operation. This article seeks to unpack that omission and suggests that it is far more problematic than commonly thought, in particular because it tends to reproduce some of the problematic features of the political economy of peacekeeping that are the background of rights abuses in the first place. Instead, as part of a tradition of thinking of human rights in terms of sovereign protection, the article makes the case for taking much more seriously the role that the host state can and should have in order to address abuses by international organizations. It emphasises how international legal discourse has tended to ‘give up’ on the host state, but also how host states have themselves been problematically quiescent about violations occurring on their territory. This has forced victims to take the improbable route of seeking to hold the UN accountable directly, bereft of the sort of legal and political mediation which one would normally expect their sovereign to provide. The article contributes some thoughts as to why host states have not taken up their citizens’ cause more forcefully with the United Nations, including governmental weakness, a domestic culture of rights neglect, but also host state dependency on peace operations. The article then suggests some leads to rethink the role of the host state in such circumstances. It points out relevant avenues under international law as well as specifically under international human rights law, drawing on the literature developed to theorise the responsibilities of states in relation to private third-party non-state actors within their jurisdiction. It argues that there is no reason why the arguments developed with private actors, notably corporations, in mind could not be applied to public actors such as the UN. Finally, the article suggests some concrete ways in which the host state could more vigorously take up the cause of rights abuses against international organizations including by requiring the setting up of standing claims commissions or making more use of its consent to peace operations, as well as ways in which it could be forced to do so through domestic law recourses. The article concludes by suggesting that reinstating the host state within what should be its natural prerogatives will not only be a better way of dealing with UN abuses, but also more conducive to the goals of peacekeeping and state construction.

36

Verdirame, G. "COMPLIANCE WITH HUMAN RIGHTS IN UN OPERATIONS." Human Rights Law Review 2, no. 2 (January 1, 2002): 265–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/2.2.265.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Joseph, S. "UN HUMAN RIGHTS TREATY BODIES: RECENT DECISIONS." Human Rights Law Review 3, no. 2 (January 1, 2003): 291–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/3.2.291.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Henry, Charles P., and Tunua Thrash. "U.S. Human Rights Petitions before the Un." Black Scholar 26, no. 3-4 (September 1996): 60–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00064246.1996.11430815.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Ávila Gaitán, Iván Darío. "Human rights, animal rights, and criticism of speciesist violence." Análisis Jurídico - Político 6, no. 11 (January 31, 2024): 15–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.22490/26655489.7271.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

El propósito de este artículo es abordar la cuestión del vínculo contemporáneo entre el derecho animal, los derechos humanos y la crítica de la violencia especista. Se argumenta que dicho vínculo se encuentra en la sintiencia, la cual ha sido reconceptualizada como la capacidad de experiencia subjetiva o consciencia, en contraste con la tradición aristotélica y cartesiana. En estas tradiciones, respecto a los animales, la sintiencia a veces se percibe de manera esencialista para legitimar una supuesta inferioridad natural y la consecuente explotación, mientras que otras veces se considera de manera reaccional descualificada. Esto contrasta con la sintiencia cualificada, que está asociada a un yo humano reflexivo. Con la reconceptualización contemporánea de la sintiencia, se argumenta que esta no necesita de un yo reflexivo cartesiano-kantiano, pero sí implica un modo de individuación a partir del cual existe alguien que puede ser afectado, que valore su vida y que distinga sus experiencias de las de los demás. En ese sentido específico, la sintiencia es sinónimo de consciencia. Este enfoque proporciona una base común para los derechos humanos y el derecho animal, ya que solo los seres que experimentan la vida como propia tienen derecho a la vida, la libertad y la integridad corporal. Esto, a su vez, lleva a cuestionar el estatus actual de los animales como cosas, bienes, recursos o propiedad. El artículo concluye estableciendo un vínculo entre la crítica de ese estatus y la crítica de la violencia especista. Esta violencia se fundamenta en el establecimiento de fronteras que separan el ego humano del Otro animal, relegado a la condición de cosa, bien o posesión. Según este argumento, en la línea de la filosofía jainista, se hace evidente que la construcción de culturas de paz requiere el reconocimiento tanto de los derechos básicos para los animales como de la codependencia interespecífica entre humanos y (otros) animales.

40

MacKay, Don. "The UN Covenants and the Human Rights Committee." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 29, no. 1 (January 1, 1999): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v29i1.6048.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The second speaker at the April Seminar commemorating the UNDR was Don MacKay. In this article he considers the international human rights developments since 1948, and the role in human rights implementation of the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations.

41

ALEKSEEV, V. YU. "THE ROLE OF THE UN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS IN INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS PROTECTION." RUSSIA AND THE CONTEMPORARY WORLD, no. 3 (2020): 253–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.31249/rsm/2020.03.16.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

King, Jeff. "Hammarskjöld and Human Rights: the Deflation of the UN Human Rights Programme 1953-1961." Journal of the History of International Law / Revue d'histoire du droit international 5, no. 2 (2003): 337–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180503770736217.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Vadlamannati, Krishna Chaitanya, Nicole Janz, and Øyvind Isachsen Berntsen. "Human Rights Shaming and FDI: Effects of the UN Human Rights Commission and Council." World Development 104 (April 2018): 222–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.014.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Renov, I. V. "UN HIGH COMMISIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE RIGHTS PROTECTION SYSTEM." Juridical scientific and electronic journal, no. 4 (2023): 728–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.32782/2524-0374/2023-4/176.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Szoszkiewicz, Łukasz. "Linguistic Human Rights in Education." Przegląd Prawniczy Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza 7 (December 15, 2017): 105–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ppuam.2017.7.07.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Linguistic human rights are a concept remaining on the crossroads of several scientific disciplines, e.g. linguistics, anthropology, psychology and, last but not least, human rights law. Taking the latter as a lens, this study seeks to clarify the concept of linguistic human rights in education – presumably, the most linguistically sensitive sphere in the life of individuals and communities. The paper demonstrates that despite little mention of language in the UN treaties (ICESCR, CRC, CERD, CADE), its importance is reflected in the practice of the relevant treaty-based bodies. Moreover, increasing interest from scholars across a range of disciplines is contributing to the development of a linguistic human rights doctrine and is penetrating the UN human rights framework.

46

Ghanea, Nazila. "I. From UN Commission on Human Rights to UN Human Rights Council: One step forwards or two steps sideways?" International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55, no. 3 (July 2006): 695–705. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei112.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The policy decision to replace the United Nations (UN) Commission on Human Rights (CHR) with a new UN Human Rights Council (HRC) was taken by governments at the September 2005 World Summit and adopted as a General Assembly (GA) resolution on 15 March 2006.1 This brought an end to the CHR's chequered 60-year history.2 The membership, structure and aims and procedures of the new HRC underwent months of intense discussion between States in the lead up to the adoption of this resolution. The purpose of this note is to explain the various proposals explored in the shaping of the HRC and the extent to which the resolution bringing it into being responded to weaknesses perceived in the CHR. Since almost every reference to the CHR came to be prefaced by the term ‘discredited’ since 2005, the question is to what extent the reasons for the loss of legitimacy in the CHR were actually addressed in the crafting of the new HRC.

47

Takata, Hinako. "NHRIs as Autonomous Human Rights Treaty Actors." Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online 24, no. 1 (December 17, 2021): 170–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18757413_02401007.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

What roles do National Human Rights Institutions (‘nhri s’) play in UN human rights treaties, and what is the normative basis of such roles? Although NHRIs are formally State organs, UN human rights treaty bodies have increasingly permitted them to participate in their procedures not as part of the State but in their own capacity as NHRIs. UN human rights treaty bodies have referred to the information and views submitted by nhri s even when such submissions did not conform to the positions taken by their States. In this sense, NHRIs are increasingly acquiring an autonomous status that is distinct from that of States under UN human rights treaties. Through a comprehensive and up- to- date examination of the practices of treaty bodies and the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions and by employing the theoretical lens of ‘global legal pluralism’, this article shows that the autonomous status of NHRIs has a solid normative basis. It is the product of the cooperative relationship between UN human rights treaties and the ‘Paris Principles’, an autonomous legal order of, by, and for nhri s, under the overarching values and principles of human rights protection, democracy, and subsidiarity.

48

Flores, Roseanne L., and Neal S. Rubin. "Psychology and Human Rights." International Perspectives in Psychology 11, no. 3 (July 2022): 161–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2157-3891/a000052.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract. In 2020, the United Nations celebrated its 75th anniversary. The celebration marked the founding of the UN Charter and reminded the world that this intergovernmental organization, created in the aftermath of World War II, was envisioned as an institution to safeguard humanity, and extend the protection and promotion of human rights, peace and security, the rule of law, and development. The anniversary also came against the backdrop of a world teetering on the brink of disaster – the COVID-19 pandemic. The UN Secretary-General described the COVID-19 pandemic as a global crisis that threatened to reverse decades of progress made in eradicating poverty, thereby exacerbating inequality and the progress made toward the Sustainable Development Goals. What began as a public health crisis quickly morphed into an economic, health, and human rights disaster. For many individuals and communities already lacking access to resources, the pandemic disproportionally impacted their right to live, their right to health and access to healthcare, and challenged their freedom to move around safely. As we continue to confront the challenges exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, we are reminded of the role psychology can play in helping us understand how our attitudes and behaviors shape our responses and support the work of rebuilding a more equitable society shaped through the lens of human rights. This paper aimed to illustrate the contributions of psychological science during the current pandemic and envision the field's future impacts to promote human rights and the UN's 2030 global agenda on sustainable development.

49

Natiq qızı Bağırova, Zeynəb. "Women's rights as part of human rights." ANCIENT LAND 14, no. 8 (August 26, 2022): 52–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.36719/2706-6185/14/52-55.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

İnsan hüquqları dedikdə, dinindən, dilindən, irqindən, cinsindən və etnik mənsubiyyətindən asılı olmayaraq, dünyadakı bütün insanların sadəcə insan olduqları üçün istifadə etdikləri hüquq və azadlıqlar başa düşülür. İnsan hüquqlarının bir hissəsi olaraq qadın hüquqları uğrunda mübarizə 1789-cu il Fransa İnqilabından sonra başladı. Tarixdə ilk dəfə olaraq qadınlar 1791-ci ildə öz Qadın və Mülki Hüquqları Bəyannaməsini nəşr etdilər. Oktyabrın 24-də BMT Nizamnaməsinin qəbulu ilə 1945-ci ildə müasir insan hüquqları rəsmiləşdi. Xüsusən də Nizamnamənin preambulasında insan hüquqlarının müdafiəsinin Birləşmiş Millətlər Təşkilatının əsas məqsədlərindən biri olduğu bildirilir və eyni zamanda kişi və qadınların bərabərliyi məsələsinə toxunulur. Dünyanın bir çox yerində qadın hüquqlarının əhəmiyyət kəsb etmədiyi bir vaxtda qadın hüquqlarına bu cür yanaşma çox vacib hesab olunurdu. 1945-ci ildə Birləşmiş Millətlər Təşkilatının yaradılmasından sonra qadın bərabərliyini təmin edən daxili orqanın yaradılması əsas məsələlərdən biri oldu. Buna görə də 1946-cı ildə BMT-nin tərkibində İnsan Hüquqları Komissiyası və Qadının Statusu üzrə Komissiya yaradıldı. Daha sonra 1979-cu ildə o dövr üçün böyük əhəmiyyət kəsb edən və müstəsna olaraq qadın hüquqlarının müdafiəsi ilə bağlı olan Qadınlara qarşı ayrı-seçkiliyin bütün formalarının ləğv edilməsi haqqında Konvensiya (CEDAW) qəbul edildi. CEDAW Konvensiyasını digər beynəlxalq sənədlərdən fərqləndirən əsas xüsusiyyət ondan ibarət idi ki, digər sənədlərdə ümumilikdə bütün insanlara təminat verilən mülki, siyasi, iqtisadi, sosial və mədəni hüquqların hər biri qadınlar üçün nəzərdə tutulmuşdur. Bəyannamənin iştirakçısı olan dövlətlər qadınları bu cür zorakılıq hərəkətlərindən qorumağa və zorakılığa məruz qalmış qadınlara belə zorakılığın qarşısını almaq üçün lazımi şərait yaratmağa borcludurlar. Ailə münasibətləri də daxil olmaqla, zorakılığın bütün formalarından uzaq yaşamaq hər bir qadının və qızın əsas insan hüququdur. Açar sözlər: İnsan hüquqları, Qadın hüquqları, CEDAW bəyannaməsi, Gender bərabərliyi, BMT Zeynab Natig Baghirova Women's rights as part of human rights Abstract Human rights mean the rights and freedoms that all people in the world, regardless of religion, language, race, gender or ethnicity, enjoy simply because they are human. As part of human rights, the struggle for women's rights began after the French Revolution of 1789. For the first time in history, women published their own Declaration of Women's and Civil Rights in 1791. With the adoption of the UN Charter on October 24, 1945, modern human rights became official. In particular, the preamble to the Charter states that the protection of human rights is one of the main goals of the United Nations, and also addresses the issue of equality between men and women. In many parts of the world, this approach to women's rights was considered very important at a time when women's rights were not important. After the establishment of the United Nations in 1945, one of the key issues was the establishment of an internal body to ensure women's equality. Therefore, in 1946, the Commission on Human Rights and the Commission on the Status of Women were established within the UN. Then, in 1979, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) was adopted, which was of great importance for that period and dealt exclusively with the protection of women's rights. The main feature that distinguished the CEDAW Convention from other international documents was that in other documents, each of the civil, political, economic, social and cultural rights guaranteed to all people in general was intended for women. The States Parties to the Declaration are obliged to protect women from such acts of violence and to provide the necessary conditions for women who have been subjected to such violence to avoid such violence. Living away from all forms of violence, including family relationships, is a fundamental human right of every woman and girl. Keywords: Human rights, Women rights, CEDAW convention, Gender equality, UN

50

Černic, Jernej Letnar. "Corporate Human Rights Obligations under Socio-economic Rights." Philosophy of law and general theory of law, no. 1 (December 21, 2021): 64–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2707-7039.1.247453.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In the chapter it is examined obligations of business in the field of socio-economic rightsThe author proceeds from the understanding of the importance of socio-economic rights to ensurethe livelihood of people and the creation of human opportunities, as well as their fundamental naturein terms of enjoying civil and political rights. The author is convinced that not only states, but alsocorporations, have certain obligations in the field of socio-economic rights. Because socioeconomicrights are linked to financial resources, corporations can make a significant contribution to securingthem in case of state fragility.The author analyzes international documents, compares national legal systems, as well as othersources (decisions of treaty bodies on human rights), and he concludes that corporate obligationsgain their legitimacy due to the horizontal application of national and international human rights law.It is noted that the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the OECD Guidelines forTransnational Enterprises, the UN Global Compact, the ILO Tripartite Declaration play a significantrole in promoting corporate human rights obligations in the field of socio-economic rights.The author also analyzes the significance of voluntary commitments of both individual corporationsand individual sectors that are generally the part of corporate policy and suggests their questionablelegal nature (lex imperfecta), as they do not provide sanctions for their violation.Analyzing the features of corporate obligations under socio-economic rights, the author takes asa basis the negative and positive dichotomy of human rights, as well as the approach embodied ininternational human rights law on three types of human rights obligations – to respect, protect, ensure.The author concludes that within each of the types of socio-economic rights obligations, corporationshave both preventive (negative and positive) and some corrective (negative and positive) obligations,especially where they control and/or or influence or in proximity of their operations.

Статті в журналах з теми "UN Human rights convenants"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями