Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Tudor’s conquest

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Tudor’s conquest"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 7 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Tudor’s conquest".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Зміст

Статті в журналах
Дисертації
Книги
Частини книг

Статті в журналах з теми "Tudor’s conquest":

1

Heffernan, David. "The reduction of Leinster and the origins of the Tudor conquest of Ireland, c.1534–46." Irish Historical Studies 40, no. 157 (May 2016): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ihs.2016.5.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

AbstractThe government’s incursion into the midlands lordships of the O’Connors and O’Mores in 1546 is often identified as the root of the Tudor conquest of Ireland. Conversely, the years from 1535 to 1546 have been depicted as a period wherein a conciliatory approach to Gaelic Ireland was favoured. This paper argues that the origins of the Tudor conquest lie in the 1530s following the Kildare Rebellion. At this time a majority of senior officials in Ireland urged the regional conquest of the lordships of the O’Byrnes, O’Tooles and MacMurrough Kavanaghs in Wicklow and Carlow. This strategy was not adopted as Henry VIII refused to finance such a costly endeavour. Consequently a cheap political alternative now known as ‘surrender and regrant’ was briefly adopted in the early 1540s. However in 1546 the officials who favoured regional intervention in Leinster succeeded in initiating an incursion into the midlands. In light of the links between the campaign for the reduction of south Leinster in the 1530s and the incursion into the midlands in 1546, this paper argues that the origins of the Tudor conquest of Ireland can be traced to the campaign for the reduction of south Leinster in the mid-1530s.

2

Böhm, Marcin. "Kildare rebellion (1534-1535) in the Annals of the Four Masters." Open Military Studies 1, no. 1 (October 31, 2020): 36–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/openms-2020-0103.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

AbstractOne of the most important Irish historical sources, which are the Annals of the Four Masters, written in the modern period, provide us with unusually valuable information about the history of the Emerald Island. In addition to data from the ancient or medieval periods, it also contains material from the difficult 16th and 17th centuries for Ireland, when it came under the yoke of English Protestants, who were initially represented by the Tudors and then by the Stuart dynasty. The Annals of the Four Masters also witnesses the resistance of the Irish, both those from Hiberno Normans and Gaelic Irish, to the demands of new authorities, including the rejection of Catholicism and total submission to the power of the kings of England. One such attempt, although unsuccessful, was the Kildare rebellion undertaken by Silken Thomas Earl of Kildare in the late 1630s. The laconic nature of Annales’ accounts, as well as the omission by this source of many important data, makes it an auxiliary material related to military history in the case of the Kildare rebellion. This is interesting because, in the context of later revolts that broke out in Ireland against the authority of the Tudors or Stuarts, in the era of further conquest of the island, this source is very valuable research material in this field.

3

Valdeón, Roberto A. "Translation, a Tudor political instrument." Target. International Journal of Translation Studies 31, no. 2 (June 21, 2019): 189–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/target.19031.val.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract Starting with an overview of F. O. Matthiessen’s work on the role of translation during the Elizabethan period, this article delves into the paratexts of the translations of Spanish colonial texts by Richard Hakluyt, Edward Grimeston, Michael Lok and John Frampton to discuss the underlying reasons why Spanish accounts of the conquest were rendered into English. The analysis of the dedications and addresses shows that, although these translations may have served to express admiration for the Spanish conquerors or to criticize their actions, the ultimate goals of these texts were to encourage England to replicate the Spanish empire in the Americas, on the one hand, and to obtain social, political and economic benefits for the translators, on the other.

4

Palmer, William. "Toward a New Moral Understanding of the Tudor Conquest of Ireland." Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques 45, no. 3 (December 1, 2019): 1–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/hrrh.2019.450301.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The English conquest of Ireland during the sixteenth century was accompanied by extreme violence. Historians remain divided on the motivations behind this violence. This article argues that the English violence in Ireland may be attributed to four main factors: the fear of foreign Catholic intervention through Ireland; the methods by which Irish rebels chose to fight; decisions made by English officials in London to not fund English forces in Ireland at a reasonable level while demanding that English officials in Ireland keep Ireland under control; and the creation of a system by which many of those who made the plans never had to see the suffering they inflicted. The troops who carried out the plans had to choose between their own survival and moral behaviors that placed their survival at risk.

5

Lenman, Bruce. "The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne: Conquest, Colonisation and Imperial Monarchy 1544–1550." French History 34, no. 2 (June 2020): 253–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fh/craa012.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

WILSON, SAMUEL. "Strategies of Conquest and Defence: Encounters with the Object in Twentieth-Century Music." Journal of the Royal Musical Association 145, no. 2 (November 2020): 457–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/rma.2020.18.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

AbstractReacting to recent materialist developments in music studies and beyond, I argue for the value of dialectics in accounting for compositional orientations vis-à-vis their objects – be these objects sound-producing, non-human entities, such as musical instruments, or the object that is ‘sound itself ’. Engaging the compositional thought and practice of Busoni, Russolo, Varèse, Cage and Tudor by way of example, I highlight two intersecting tendencies: the first constitutes a presumed mastery over the object in question; the second is suggestive of an exploration of the object on its own terms. Interweaving aspects of post-Marxist and psychoanalytic theory, I argue that, ultimately, our orientation towards the object manifests a negotiation of the self in a changing material world.

7

Egan, Simon. "Murphy, The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne: Conquest, Colonisation and Imperial Monarchy, 1544–1550." Scottish Historical Review 98, no. 2 (October 2019): 305–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/shr.2019.0408.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Gillespie, Raymond. "Refraining the Reformation." Irish Historical Studies 36, no. 144 (November 2009): 598–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021121400005903.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Reformation in Ireland has never lacked chroniclers, defenders and detractors. The reason for this is not hard to discern. The older literature that grappled with the processes of religious change in sixteenth and seventeenth-century Ireland was based on a number of well-recognised and widely agreed propositions. The first of these was that confessional and political positions were inextricably linked, and the fate of one served not only as a proxy for the other but as an explanation for the trajectory of change; thus, to explain the failure of the reform process to strike deep roots in sixteenth-century Ireland, one had only to invoke the failure of the Tudor conquest.

9

Fukuyama, Francis. "The Last English Civil War." Daedalus 147, no. 1 (January 2018): 15–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00470.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This essay examines why England experienced a civil war every fifty years from the Norman Conquest up until the Glorious Revolution of 1688–1689, and was completely stable after that point. The reasons had to do with, first, the slow accumulation of law and respect for the law that had occurred by the seventeenth century, and second, with the emergence of a strong English state and sense of national identity by the end of the Tudor period. This suggests that normative factors are very important in creating stable settlements. Rational choice explanations for such outcomes assert that stalemated conflicts will lead parties to accept second- or third-best outcomes, but English history, as well as more recent experiences, suggests that stability requires normative change as well.

10

Potter, David. "Neil Murphy. The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne: Conquest, Colonization and Imperial Monarchy, 1544–1550." American Historical Review 125, no. 4 (October 2020): 1505–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhz1262.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Tudor’s conquest":

1

Attia, Marion. "Sir John Davies et la Tanistry : une histoire juridique de la Conquête de l'Irlande (XIIe-XVIIe s.)." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Paris 10, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023PA100149.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Au début du XVIIème siècle, le procureur général d’Irlande John Davies (1569-1626) contribue à la mise en application définitive du droit anglais dans l’île, dont la conquête a eu lieu au XIIème siècle. À cette fin, il s’attaque frontalement au droit successoral traditionnel irlandais (appelé tanistry), gouvernant la transmission du pouvoir dans les seigneuries. Il en soutient l’abolition devant la justice (Case of tanistry), ainsi que dans ses écrits sur l’histoire de la colonisation de l’île à partir du XIIème siècle. L’étude de l’œuvre de John Davies permet donc d’aborder la question de la conquête de l’Irlande par l’Angleterre sous l’angle juridique. Le droit successoral apparaît en effet comme un enjeu central, sa modification par les Anglais permettant d’aboutir à la maîtrise des terres, et donc à un contrôle de l’île toute entière. Les écrits juridiques de l’auteur ne doivent cependant pas occulter l’activité de propagande qui caractérise également son œuvre. L’ensemble de ses écrits permet ainsi d’appréhender les enjeux politiques et juridiques mais aussi l’évolution de la conquête, pendant une période particulièrement longue
At the beginning of the 17th century, John Davies (1569-1626), the Attorney General of Ireland, contributed to the definitive application of English law on the island, which had been conquered in the 12th century. To this end, he attacked head-on the traditional Irish law of succession (known as tanistry), which governed the transmission of power in the lordships, and which he supported the abolition in the courts (Case of tanistry), as well as in his writings on the history of the colonization of the island from the twelfth century onwards. A study of John Davies's work therefore allows us to approach the question of the conquest of Ireland by England from a legal angle. Inheritance law appears to be a central issue, as its modification by the English would lead to control of the land and therefore control of the whole island. The author's legal writing should not, however, overshadow the propaganda activity that also characterizes his work. Taken together, his writings provide an insight into the political and legal issues at stake, as well as the development of the conquest over a particularly long period

2

Литвиновська, Юлія Анатоліївна, та Yuliia Anatoliivna Lytvynovska. "Соціально-економічні та політичні трансформації в Англії в епоху Тюдорів". Master's thesis, 2020. http://repository.sspu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9850.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Дане дослідження розкриває тему внутрішньої та зовнішньої політики Англійського королівства в часи правління династії Тюдорів. В роботі описана вітчизняна та зарубіжна історіографія по темі дослідження, дано характеристику ключовим персоналіям династії та проаналізовано суть і значення їх соціально-економічних та політичних реформ.
This study reveals the topic of domestic and foreign policy of the Kingdom of England during the reign of the Tudor dynasty. The paper describes domestic and foreign historiography on the topic of research, gives a description of the key personalities of the dynasty and analyzes the essence and significance of their socio-economic and political reforms.

Книги з теми "Tudor’s conquest":

1

Murphy, Neil. Tudor Occupation of Boulogne: Conquest, Colonisation and Imperial Monarchy, 1544-1550. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Murphy, Neil. The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne: Conquest, Colonisation and Imperial Monarchy, 1544-1550. Cambridge University Press, 2019.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Paxton, Jennifer. The Story of Medieval England: From King Arthur to the Tudor Conquest. The Teaching Company, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Simpson, Margaret. Elizabeth I and Her Conquests (Horribly Famous). Scholastic, 2006.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "Tudor’s conquest":

1

Ellis, Steven G. "The limits of power: the English crown and the British Isles." In The Sixteenth Century1485-1603, 47–82. Oxford University PressOxford, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198207672.003.0003.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract The chief legacy of the Tudors in terms of state formation was perhaps to create the circumstances in which a multiple monarchy coterminous with the British Isles emerged in 1603. This development was the product of two separate processes. In the first place, the reduction of all Ireland to peace and civility-which, in effect, meant the conquest of the hitherto-independent Gaelic parts-had long been an English ambition. It represented the final phase of a process of monarchical expansion and centralization in the Tudor state which also saw the imposition of standard English structures of local government in other outlying parts, notably Wales and the English far north. Essentially, this involved the welding into a composite monarchy of those territories ruled by medieval kings as ‘parcels’ or dominions of the English crown. Second, there was the Union of the Crowns with Scotland, which brought together under one king two very different, and traditionally hostile, kingdoms. This was the half intended result of the dynastic marriage in 1503 between Henry Tudor’s daughter, Margaret, and King James IV of Scots, and it was foreshadowed too in the projected but abortive marriage involving the future Edward VI and Mary, queen of Scots.

2

"The Conquest of Ireland." In England Under the Tudors, 394–404. Routledge, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203825426-62.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Heffernan, David. "Conquest or conciliation?" In Debating Tudor policy in sixteenth-century Ireland. Manchester University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7765/9781526118172.00011.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

"Conquest, Cartography and Treaty." In The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne, 66–105. Cambridge University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108653046.004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Bradshaw, Brendan. "Robe and sword in the conquest of Ireland." In Law and Government under the Tudors, 139–62. Cambridge University Press, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511560491.009.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Williams, Robert A. "The Protestant Translation of Medieval and Renaissance Discourses on the Rights and Status of American Indians." In The American Indian in Western Legal Thought, 121–50. Oxford University PressNew York, NY, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195050226.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract The patents granted by the Tudor king Henry VII (r. 1485-1509) to the Cabots at the close of the fifteenth century inaugurated English interest in America as a possible colonial empire. Although several centuries separated the Tudor dynasty from the heraldic Crusading traditions established by Richard the Lionhearted,2 Henry’s initial 1497 charter of conquest to John Cabot indicates that the medieval discourses of the Catholic Church respecting infidel rights and status still dominated English legal thought and practice a short generation prior to the Reformation.

7

Heffernan, David. "Conquest or conciliation? The policy debate in Henrician Ireland, c.1515–15461." In Debating Tudor policy in sixteenth-century Ireland. Manchester University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526118165.003.0002.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The first chapter examines the ‘reform’ treatises written more or less during the reigns of Henry VII and Henry VIII and how they impacted upon the development of government policy in Ireland up to 1546. I argue that most writers were overwhelmingly in favour of a programme of renewed conquest, beginning in those parts of Leinster immediately adjoining the Dublin-centred Pale, and that they believed this would finally be initiated following the Kildare Rebellion in the mid-1530s. However owing to Henry VIII’s unwillingness to fund such a conquest a cheap strategy of conciliation known as ‘surrender and regrant’ was briefly experimented with in the early 1540s. The chapter also examines the policy debate, and treatises written on, religious reform and regional reform of Munster and Ulster through the establishment of provincial councils and settlement of colonies.

8

"The Conquest of Boulogne and the History of Tudor England." In The Tudor Occupation of Boulogne, 1–17. Cambridge University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781108653046.002.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Heffernan, David. "‘Reform’ treatises and the inception of the Tudor conquest in mid-sixteenth-century Ireland, 1546–1565." In Debating Tudor policy in sixteenth-century Ireland. Manchester University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526118165.003.0003.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The chapter begins in 1546 when a military incursion was launched by the Dublin government against the Irish lordships of the O’Mores and O’Connors in the Irish midlands of Laois and Offaly. I argue that this military venture was the first step in the Tudor conquest of Ireland. Eventually in the 1550s the plantation of this region was undertaken, thus initiating the general pattern whereby Ireland would be conquered and resettled down to the end of the seventeenth century. The chapter then goes on to examine the other major policy issues of the mid-Tudor period, specifically the growing threat posed to the Tudor state by Shane O’Neill’s ascendancy in Ulster and the incursion of Scottish settlers from the Outer Hebrides into the north-east of Ireland. Finally, consideration is given to the long viceregal administration of the third earl of Sussex and the criticism it drew from Irish officials in the late 1550s and early 1560s owing to its recourse to the ‘cess’ and other practices. Throughout the chapter how these issues arose in the treatises is discussed and the ideas put forward contextualised.

10

"THE TUDOR MONARCHY AND THE SECOND CONQUEST OF IRELAND, 1540–1603." In A History of Ireland, 161–206. Routledge, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203987308-15.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.