Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Task disengagement"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Task disengagement".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Task disengagement"
Zhou, Mingming, and Jing Ren. "A self-determination perspective on Chinese fifth-graders’ task disengagement." School Psychology International 38, no. 2 (December 21, 2016): 149–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0143034316684532.
Повний текст джерелаBarber, Larissa K., Matthew J. Grawitch, and David C. Munz. "Disengaging From a Task." Journal of Individual Differences 33, no. 2 (January 2012): 76–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000064.
Повний текст джерелаGschwendtner, Kathrin M., Stefanie C. Biehl, Andreas Mühlberger, Claudia Sommer, Andrea Kübler, Andreas Reif, and Martin J. Herrmann. "The Relationship Between Valence, Task Difficulty, and the COMT Val 158 Met Polymorphism in Disengagement Processes." Journal of Psychophysiology 26, no. 3 (January 2012): 124–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803/a000075.
Повний текст джерелаLi, Na, Cong Wang, and Wenwen Shi. "Athletes' Goal Orientations and Attitudes towards Doping: Moral Disengagement in Sport as a Mediator." American Journal of Health Behavior 46, no. 3 (June 23, 2022): 337–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5993/ajhb.46.3.12.
Повний текст джерелаSaragih, Surya Mutiara, Andi Ina Yustina, and Christine Novita Dewi. "Reinforcing Moral Disengagement in the Relationship of Ethical Leadership on Employee Task Performance." JURNAL AKUNTANSI, EKONOMI dan MANAJEMEN BISNIS 9, no. 2 (December 31, 2021): 175–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.30871/jaemb.v9i2.3216.
Повний текст джерелаLi, Bing, Jing Guang, and Mingsha Zhang. "The role of fixation disengagement and oculomotor preparation in gap saccade task is gap-duration dependent." Journal of Neurophysiology 126, no. 6 (December 1, 2021): 2053–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00259.2021.
Повний текст джерелаFortgang, Rebecca, and Vinod Srihari. "41. Cognitive Disengagement and Task Switching in Patients With Schizophrenia." Schizophrenia Bulletin 43, suppl_1 (March 1, 2017): S23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx021.060.
Повний текст джерелаDonald, Fiona M., and Craig H. M. Donald. "Task disengagement and implications for vigilance performance in CCTV surveillance." Cognition, Technology & Work 17, no. 1 (October 5, 2014): 121–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-014-0309-8.
Повний текст джерелаNelson, D., M. Lopian, and N. Bratt. "Investigating the role of attentional disengagement bias in the tendency, ability and persistence of worry." European Psychiatry 26, S2 (March 2011): 169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0924-9338(11)71880-6.
Повний текст джерелаFontanini, Alfredo, and Donald B. Katz. "7 to 12 Hz Activity in Rat Gustatory Cortex Reflects Disengagement From a Fluid Self-Administration Task." Journal of Neurophysiology 93, no. 5 (May 2005): 2832–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.01035.2004.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Task disengagement"
Bermås, Mikael, and Andreas Kjellén. "Selektiv Uppmärksamhet hos Personer med Insomni : En experimentell studie med bildbaserat Dot-probe task." Thesis, Örebro universitet, Akademin för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2010. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-10937.
Повний текст джерелаCognitive models have suggested selective attention as a contributing factor of perpetuating insomnia. In this study the dot probe task was employed in an experiment in order to investigate whether the level of selective attention differentiates individuals with insomnia from a matched group of normal sleepers, and if any difference exist, the nature of such selective attention. Also, the relation of selective attention to anxiety and depression was investigated. The results show that the groups differ significantly on selective attention, and that neither anxiety nor depression can account for these differences. The results specifically show that the selective attention consists of difficulty in disengaging from threat rather than heightened vigilance to threat. These findings may implicate the clinical view on insomnia treatment.
Blackmore, Michelle A. "Attentional Bias for Affective Stimuli: Evaluation of Disengagement in Persons with and without Self-reported Generalized Anxiety Disorder." Diss., Temple University Libraries, 2011. http://cdm16002.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/ref/collection/p245801coll10/id/147943.
Повний текст джерелаPh.D.
A core feature of GAD, excessive and uncontrollable worry, may be indicative of poor attentional control and difficulty disengaging attention from threatening or emotional information (e.g., Fox, 2004; Mathews, Fox, Yiend, & Calder, 2003; Yiend & Mathews 2001). The current study examined the performance of college students with and without self-reported GAD (N = 63) on measures of attentional control and a spatial cueing task designed to assess engagement-disengagement processes from emotionally valenced (aversive, pleasant) and neutral picture stimuli. Attentional control abilities were examined using the Stroop Color-Word Association Test (SCW Test) and Trail-Making Test (TMT). Separate analyses of variance (ANOVAs) demonstrated that GAD participants performed more poorly on the Stroop Color subtest and the TMT: Part B than non-GAD participants. Mixed ANOVAs of response times measured during the spatial cueing task revealed significant main effects for Cue Valence and Cue Validity, as well as several significant interactions of these variables with GAD status. The significant Cue Valence x Cue Validity x GAD status interaction indicated that GAD participants were slower to disengage their attention from aversive stimuli, relative to pleasant or neutral stimuli, than non-GAD participants who did not exhibit this bias. This interaction effect, however, did not remain significant upon covarying for depression. Together, these findings suggest that individuals with GAD evidence poorer attentional control and demonstrate difficulties disengaging from threatening stimuli compared to persons without the disorder. Impairment in these attentional processes may, therefore, contribute to the etiology and maintenance of GAD.
Temple University--Theses
Pelagatti, Claudia. "Moving forward in the neurocognitive study of mind-wandering: tracking the onset and time-course of mind-wandering." Doctoral thesis, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2158/1150717.
Повний текст джерела"Neurobiological Mechanisms of Cognitive Maintenance and Disengagement: Accounting for Dissociable Variance in Working Memory and Fluid Intelligence Task Performance." Master's thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.44255.
Повний текст джерелаDissertation/Thesis
Masters Thesis Psychology 2017
Ross, Rachel Michelle. "An investigation into how emotional words affect processing in the emotional Stroop task." Thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/1318028.
Повний текст джерелаScope: The emotional Stroop effect (ESE) is calculated as the difference in reaction time between classifying the print colour of emotional (e.g., SAD) and non-emotional (PAD) words. Since participants focus on colour and ignore the emotional content, the existence of ESE demonstrates an automatic attentional bias towards emotional stimuli. Recent literature has questioned if attention bias is automatic. ESE literature thus far has relied on one particular method of analysing ESE data, which has likely influenced our understanding of automaticity in the ESE. The ESE is typically calculated by subtracting the mean response time of the emotional condition from the mean response time of the neutral condition. A common, implicit assumption is made that participants process all words despite their detrimental effect on performance and therefore processing is obligatory. However, this conclusion is based on a difference between two collections of means and does not have explanatory power to determine whether emotional processing occurs on each trial. Processing may not be obligatory on each and every trial and yet ESE can still be observed. Individuals could process emotions on some trials and successfully ignore the word’s content on other trials. EST data may in fact be a combination of these two processes that have not been partitioned out. Alternatively, processing may in fact occur on all trials with each word varying on a spectrum from shallow processing to deeper level of processing (Craik & Lockhart, 1972). Thus three options exist to explain emotional processing in the task; participants process all items, participant process some items, or participants process items depending on relevance for performance. A novel task is offered to discriminate between these options. Purpose: We tested whether processing emotional stimuli is obligatory, non-obligatory or task dependent by applying a novel, forced-processing task. In the novel forced-processing task, participants must identify both the ink colour and the emotionality of words (emotional or non-emotional). Participants are forced to read and engage with the emotional content of every item. This task is then compared with a control emotional Stroop task. The control task involves font discrimination (italic or not italic) yet does not require judgment about emotional content; participants classify the colour of print and identify if any letters are in italics. The goal of the current study is to discriminate between three alternative views of emotional processing in the emotional Stoop task; obligatory, non-obligatory or task dependent by applying a novel task. A comparison between performance in the forced-processing task and the control task may offer greater insight into mechanisms underlying emotional processing. Importantly, the three theories of interest each predict a different pattern of results. Experiment 1 tests which of the predicted patterns of interaction is supported by data. Experiment 2 then replicates Experiment 1 with minor methodological changes, which allow exploration of slow vs fast effects (Sharma & McKenna, 2004) and offers some clarification regarding the role of implicit and explicit processing. Methodology: Fifty-five participants, across two experiments, completed the control and forced-processing tasks. Each participant performed both the control emotional Stroop task and the forced-processing emotional Stroop task. On conclusion of the second task, participants completed the item classification questionnaire, the BDI-II and DASS. A 2 by 2 within-subjects analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted on the variables task (control, forced) and condition (emotional, non-emotional) with reaction time (RT) as the dependent measure. Results: Results were consistent across both experiments. Data revealed an inverse ESE in the forced task but not in the control demonstrating that response time for emotional items were facilitated when disengagement was not required. Results were consistent with the non-obligatory and delayed disengagement view of emotional processing with a significant ESE in the control task and a significant but reversed ESE in the forced task. General Conclusions and Implications: We concluded that emotional processing does not occur on all trials, supporting a non-obligatory view of processing, and the ESE may be driven by stimuli disengagement. Results suggests that, rather than an automatic process, participants process items differently when the task forces emotional processing. Not only was there a change in ESE between tasks, the change in instruction produced a reversed ESE in both experiments. This suggests that participants process emotional items faster when emotional processing is forced or required for performance (forced-processing task) than when emotional processing (control task) is not required. Implications of the Larger Work: The finding that some but not all emotional stimuli draw attentional bias is significant as it undermines the foundations of the ESE analysis. Two consequences are evident. Firstly, inferences made based on the ESE, both theoretical and applied, ought to now come under investigation. Secondly, changes to the emotional Stroop task are necessary to ensure consistency in item processing depth and frequency. Without methodological modifications the common ESE analysis, a comparison of means, is fundamentally flawed.
Частини книг з теми "Task disengagement"
"5. Disengagements from Dyadic Task Interactions." In Social Actions for Classroom Language Learning, 103–42. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.21832/9781847690272-006.
Повний текст джерелаKalinowska, Monika. "Głos Starych Poetów – późna twórczość liryczna w świetle wybranych teorii starzenia się." In Obiektywny i subiektywny wymiar starości. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/8088-010-8.16.
Повний текст джерелаRahmani, Masoumeh. "Deconversion." In Drifting through Samsara, 193–216. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197579961.003.0007.
Повний текст джерелаKearney, Christopher A. "The Anxious Middle/High School Adolescent." In Helping Families of Youth with School Attendance Problems, 81–102. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med-psych/9780190912574.003.0005.
Повний текст джерелаErçetin, Şefika Şule, and Şuay Nilhan Açıkalın. "Is President Erdoğan Really a Dictator?" In Advances in Religious and Cultural Studies, 1–18. IGI Global, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0148-0.ch001.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Task disengagement"
Liu, Jikai, Biao Ma, Heyan Li, Man Chen, and Jianwen Chen. "Downshifting Control Strategy for Dual Clutch Transmission With Single Clutch Slippage." In ASME 2016 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/dscc2016-9793.
Повний текст джерелаJasný, Michal, Michal Hajžman, and Radek Bulín. "Dog Clutch Without Circular Backlash – Design Optimization Using Multi-Body Simulation." In FISITA World Congress 2021. FISITA, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46720/f2020-adm-083.
Повний текст джерелаRossi, Silvia, Gabriella Santangelo, Martina Ruocco, Giovanni Ercolano, Luca Raggioli, and Emanuele Savino. "Evaluating Distraction and Disengagement for Non-interactive Robot Tasks." In HRI '18: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173386.3176957.
Повний текст джерелаRossi, Silvia, Giovanni Ercolano, Luca Raggioli, Emanuele Savino, and Martina Ruocco. "The Disappearing Robot: An Analysis of Disengagement and Distraction During Non-Interactive Tasks." In 2018 27th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/roman.2018.8525514.
Повний текст джерелаSanchez, Sergio. "Engagement/Disengagement in English Class Discussions: Preservice Teachers Noticing, Theorizing, and Planning for Meaningful Talk." In 2020 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1584287.
Повний текст джерелаBrunk, Angie, and Daniel Ireton. "Failures in library website accessibility: A problem of accountability." In 13th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2022). AHFE International, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1001645.
Повний текст джерела