Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Surveillance and influence capitalism.
Статті в журналах з теми "Surveillance and influence capitalism"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Surveillance and influence capitalism".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
1
Yolles, Maurice. "Diagnosing Market Capitalism: A Metacybernetic View." Systems 12, no. 9 (September 11, 2024): 361. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/systems12090361.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This multidisciplinary paper contributes to political economy, social cybernetics, and philosophy by examining distinctions in market capitalist ideologies through a metacybernetic approach. It explores reflexive processes, akin to Adam Smith’s invisible and visible hands, and their impact on market ideologies. The study highlights the evolutifon of these ideologies in balancing egoism and altruism, revealing insights into sociocultural shifts. Some ideologies are more prone to pathologies like market hegemony, which disrupts market viability and social welfare. Diagnosing these ideologies is essential to address issues of market hegemony like platform capitalism, technofeudalism, and surveillance capitalism. After a comparative analysis of capitalist ideologies, the paper focuses on neoliberal and stakeholder capitalism, due to their dominance, contrasting philosophies, policy influence, and roles in global challenges. A metacybernetic perspective is adopted, modelling the market as a complex adaptive system with agency, using Mindset Agency Theory (MAT). MAT distinguishes agency into subagencies of affect and cognition. Recognising the role of spirit, a spirit subagency is configured into MAT to enable explicit consideration of attributes like ethics and the greater good within the market, relationally improving transparency and promoting sustainable and inclusive economic practices. MAT is applied to the evolution of capitalist ideologies, examining their viability and sustainability under changing conditions. With its now triadic interactive subagency structure, MAT identifies eight distinct types of mindset, each characterised by 21 parameters that combine to deliver unique variations, in neoliberal and stakeholder capitalism, of the market ideologies.
2
Ptaszek, Grzegorz. "Surveillance capitalism and privacy. Knowledge and attitudes on surveillance capitalism and online institutional privacy protection practices among adolescents in Poland." Mediatization Studies 2 (June 26, 2019): 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ms.2018.2.49-68.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
<p>The purpose of the study was to determine the level of knowledge and attitudes towards surveillance capitalism and online institutional privacy protection practices among adolescents in Poland (aged 18–19), as well as to determine the relationships between these variables. Surveillance capitalism has emerged as a result of internet users’ activities and involves the collection of all data about these users by different entities for specific benefits without letting them know about it. The dominant role in surveillance capitalism is played by hi-tech corporations. The aim of the study was to verify whether knowledge, and what kind of knowledge, on surveillance capitalism translates into practices related to the protection of online institutional privacy. The study was conducted on a sample of 177 adolescents in Poland. The main part of the questionnaire consisted of two scales: the scale of knowledge and attitudes on surveillance capitalism, and the scale of online institutional privacy protection practices. The results of the study, calculated by statistical methods, showed that although the majority of respondents had average knowledge and attitudes about surveillance capitalism, which may result from insufficient knowledge of the subject matter, this participation in specialized activities/workshops influences the level of intensification of online institutional privacy protection practices.</p>
3
Puślecki, Zdzisław W. "Od kapitalizmu informacyjnego do kapitalizmu inwigilacyjnego." Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe 36, no. 4 (December 15, 2021): 43–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/h.2021.4.2.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The digital revolution imposes a new economic order. Surveillance capitalism has its origins in (classical) market capitalism, but it differs significantly from it. In the traditional (classical) model of capitalism, there are goods that are produced in order to be sold. However, in the 21st century it is difficult to compete. It is not easy to find new added value that would determine the margin and profit. The question is, how long can you keep your labor costs down? This is why surveillance capitalism arose. His story is relatively young. It was established in the years 2000–2004. As the Internet bubble burst, investors threatened the company to pull out of funding, unable to find a quick way to monetize it. Then Google suddenly discovered that the last virgin territory that had not yet hit the market was human nature. It is worth noting that it is much easier to predict something if you first interfere with the behavior so that it takes the desired forms. To put it bluntly – the market is trying to push its individual participants, as customers and consumers, more and more in the direction it prefers, trying to influence their opinions, sometimes even driving them to specific places. The aim of the study is to present the problems that led to the transformation of information capitalism into surveillance capitalism.
4
Ciborowski, Robert, Aneta Kargol-Wasiluk, and Marian Zalesko. "Surveillance in Capitalism Versus Surveillance Capitalism – Analisis of Contemporary Constraints of Civil Rights in the Context of Dataism and Post-Truth." Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 67, no. 1 (December 1, 2022): 321–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2022-0016.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract The paper is devoted to the issue of surveillance in capitalism (surveillance capitalism), a phenomenon which has spread in that socio-economic system since the beginning of the 21st century. We attempt to point out the harmfulness of information technologies developing in the wrong direction, carrying the ideas of dataism and post-truth, which increasingly colonize human living space. It turns out that the information (traces) that people leave while operating on the Internet is a source of predicting human behavior in the future (behavioral futures markets). Thus, for the most developed Internet enterprises in the world, they become a motive for violating what seem to be basic political rights, mainly freedom, property and security. As a result, under the influence of the disinformation often present on the Internet, people’s behavior may take the most socially undesirable forms, but desirable in the virtual world. The considerations in the paper are primarily theoretical. The descriptive method was used with elements of the conceptual analysis of surveillance capitalism in the context of dataism and post-truth.
5
Mertzani, Asimina, and Jeremy Pitt. "Social Influence and the Normalization of Surveillance Capitalism: Legislation for the Next Generation." IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 41, no. 2 (June 2022): 57–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mts.2022.3173321.
Повний текст джерела
6
RĄB, ŁUKASZ, and KAROLINA KETTLER. "PERSPECTIVE OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN POST-PANDEMIC WORLD: SURVEILLANCE CAPITALISM AND HOPES." Society Register 4, no. 2 (April 7, 2020): 159–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/sr.2020.4.2.12.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The current coronavirus pandemic is not only a health/healthcare crisis but to a vast extent it will also influence other spheres of life, including social relations, the shape of economy and working models, and natural environment. Sustainable development that relies on the previously mentioned pillars (economy, society, environment) is going to be strongly affected by the virus outbreak. There is a threat that the process of recovering from the corona crisis will accelerate and legitimize the dynamics of surveillance capitalism. A really interesting case is going to be the labor world, where thanks to modern technologies, suppression of personal freedoms and triumph of total surveillance might be particularly easy. However, good scenarios are also plausible. The first 21st century pandemic of that scale may force societies to redefine their current modus operandi and shift capitalism into a more sustainable, humanistic model.
7
Stachowicz, Jerzy. "Kalifornizacja motoryzacji – samochód jako cyfrowa maszyna medialna." Przegląd Humanistyczny, no. 67/1 (June 18, 2023): 30–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.31338/2657-599x.ph.2023-1.2.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The car treated as a media machine undergoes a specific process of remediation and can be reflected upon within the framework of media theory. The article analyzes the changes that the automotive industry and the car as its product are undergoing under the influence of ubiquitous digitization, surveillance capitalism, and related visions of the future.
8
Briant, Emma. "Lessons from the Cambridge Analytica Crisis." Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare 3, no. 3 (March 17, 2021): 125–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.21810/jicw.v3i3.2775.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
On November 27, 2020, Dr. Emma Briant presented Lessons from the Cambridge Analytica Crisis: Confronting Today's (Dis)information Challenges, at the 2020 CASIS West Coast Security Conference. The presentation was followed by a question and answer period with other speakers. The key points of the discussion focused on digital mercenaries, surveillance capitalism, and Western government/military responses to foreign influence campaigns.
9
Heemsbergen, Luke, Shiri Krebs, Radhika Gorur, and Alexia Maddox. "Algorithmic Performance Management in Higher Education: Viva! 365 Ways of Surveillance." Surveillance & Society 22, no. 2 (June 16, 2024): 73–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v22i2.15776.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper maps the emergence and consequences of automated Algorithmic Performance Management (APM) in the context of higher education. After reviewing the evolution of productivity management in academia, it argues that surveillance via APM shifts expectations not just about effectiveness at work but also about how work, and the good worker, come to be defined. In our paradigmatic case study of Office 365, we specify how the automated surveillance of workforce practices are deployed to redefine productivity in higher education: productive workers become good data subjects as well as producers of papers, grants, and other traditional outputs of success. Our analysis suggests performing well at work is managed in and by the platform via logics of the surveillance of wellness, time-regulation, and social connectivity to influence, manage, and control workers. We critique these automated performance measures in terms of platform capitalism, noting Office 365’s Viva Insights function as a telematic device of surveillance. The final section of the paper places these trends in Australia’s socio-legal context by showing how Viva is insufficient for considering performance given the range of practices that constitute “academic work,” including but not limited to the need for unmonitored activity. Yet, we observe that currently little can be done about Office 365’s surveillant presence given a regulatory regime that by and large excludes productivity surveillance from the scope of regulated surveillance activities.
10
Ożóg, Maciej. "Czy to naprawdę ja? Artystów gry z tożsamością algorytmiczną." Przegląd Kulturoznawczy, no. 2 (60) (October 2024): 267–70. https://doi.org/10.4467/20843860pk.24.019.20330.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article examines examples of artistic activities in which the problem of digitization of identity in the era of social media is critically addressed. Algorithmic data processing and thus creating a virtual shadow, the digital selves of users, are the key practices of surveillance capitalism. Therefore, to provide context to the analysis of works of three artists (Erica Sourti, Aram Bartholl, Timo Toots) a short overview of the evolution of the concept and practices of social media is introduced. From the very beginning, the key place in the concept of Web 2.0 and social media was assigned to the user, understood as an active agent, who autonomously creates and controls his/her position on the Internet. As economic and cultural hegemony of platforms increased, the gap between the ideology of active prosumers and practices resulting in the objectification, commodification and incapacitation of users became increasingly clear. A special role in this process is played by user profiling and the creation of digital identities that are useful from the point of view of corporations. By investigating the mechanisms of algorithmic power and its consequences for the status of users involved in online power relations, Scourti, Bartholl and Toots pose a number of questions crucial for understanding of contemporary culture dominated by social media moguls. What are the relationships between the embodied subject and his/her digital self? How does the digital re-creation of the subject influence the existential possibilities of users, their self-awareness and possibilities for self-governance? What are the consequences of commercial user profiling for understanding the very category of self? How can users influence the production and presence of digital identities? Is individual and social resistance to the instrumental power of surveillance capitalism possible? If so, what forms might it take?
11
Partin, William Clyde. "Watch Me Pay: Twitch and the Cultural Economy of Surveillance." Surveillance & Society 17, no. 1/2 (March 31, 2019): 153–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13021.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper describes where and how research into the Amazon-owned livestreaming platform Twitch can profitably engage surveillance studies. It argues that Twitch sits at the intersection of what David Lyon calls “surveillance culture,” a culture in which watching and being watched is fundamental to individuals’ customs, habits, and ways of interpreting the world; and surveillance capitalism, Shoshana Zuboff’s term for an emerging logic of accumulation built on data collection and hoarding. I draw attention to three different actors in the Twitch ecosystem—the viewer, the streamer, and the platform owner—to articulate the different modes of seeing and being seen each position affords. In all cases, I illustrate how visibility is bound up in a complex, multidirectional web of political economic relations. In order to resist technological determinist narratives about platform effects, I consider Twitch as a “boundary object” in order to identify how social, geographical, and cultural context influences actors in each position. I conclude by offering some observations about what Twitch reveals about platform surveillance in general.
12
Halliday, Rebecca. "‘Cyber warfare’ in style: Cambridge Analytica and a mediatized ethics of fashion." International Journal of Fashion Studies 9, no. 1 (April 1, 2022): 131–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/infs_00063_1.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
On 29 November 2018, Christopher Wylie – a former Ph.D. researcher in fashion trends and the whistleblower of Cambridge Analytica – delivered a speech to The Business of Fashion’s VOICES conference, detailing how the firm harvested the data of more than 87 million Facebook users and utilized fashion psychographic brand preferences as measurable and estimable data that could be manipulated to influence political opinion through targeted psychographic social media content. This article takes Cambridge Analytica as a point of departure to explore interstices between fashion brands and consumers, and entrenched surveillance, in a mediatized field of fashion and within the culture wars. Jodi Dean’s concept of communicative capitalism, in which consumer statements take the form of affective bursts disseminated into and captured via the network under a market logic, articulates how our desires and/as identities can be honed to alter democratic processes and outcomes. Extending an affect framework, I posit that formations of consumer or user affect characterize relations between fashion companies and consumers in a politicized climate. This paper issues a call to scrutinize issues of media ethics, discourse and surveillance that these cases raise via a fashion studies perspective that perceives aesthetic preference as formative and reflective of global politics.
13
Quinelato, Pietra Daneluzzi. "Consumer manipulation through behavioral advertising." Brazilian Journal of Law, Technology and Innovation 2, no. 1 (January 2, 2024): 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.59224/bjlti.v2i1.1-24.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In the contemporary era marked by technological advancements and pervasive use of social media, there has been a notable surge in the collection and subsequent processing of personal data, transforming them into economic assets exploited by corporations. This phenomenon gives rise to a "surveillance society" or "mental capitalism," prominently characterized by the customization of advertisements based on users' consumption profiles and behaviors. Despite its focus on personalized advertising, this practice frequently employs persuasive techniques that possess the potential to influence consumer decisions, prompting concerns about user manipulation and the erosion of decision-making autonomy. This study employs the exploratory deductive method to scrutinize the provisions of one of the European Union's latest regulations tailored for digital platforms, namely the Data Services Act, and its efficacy in addressing the prevailing issues. The research identifies ambiguity within the regulation, particularly regarding its applicability to operations involving the processing of personal data and dark patterns. Additionally, findings emphasize the necessity for active supervision, especially concerning the profiling of children and adolescents. In conclusion, this study underscores the urgency of implementing regulatory measures to ensure more effective protection, mitigating persuasive and obscure practices on social media. Such efforts aim to preserve consumer autonomy and rights in an increasingly digital and data-driven world.
14
Bess, Jennifer. "The “Crisis” of Native American Mobility." Pacific Historical Review 93, no. 2 (2024): 169–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/phr.2024.93.2.169.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article examines two incidents of Quechan and Tohono O’odham mobility across the U.S.-Mexico border in the late 1890s. Contrasts between the incidents reveal the influence of international relations on U.S. Indian policy, as federal officials responded to local events in ways that were shaped by issues ranging from extradition laws to customs protections to diplomatic pressures. More broadly, the incidents shed light on some of the variety inherent to Indigenous relationships with the border and some of the textures of Anglo-America’s conceptions of the border as an instrument of cultural assimilation, capitalist development, and territorial surveillance and control.
15
Volchik, Vyacheslav. "Unreliable Narratives in the Context of Institutional Change." Issues of Economic Theory 21, no. 4 (November 7, 2023): 53–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666vte_2023_4_53_67.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article develops approaches of the narrative economics to the analysis of evolution of institutions in the context of dissemination of unreliable (false) information about various kinds of economic processes. Narratives are seen as a way of transferring information and knowledge in a form that is maximally complementary to the perception of actors. Fake news became the most important channel of distribution of false narratives in modern society. The avalanche-like spread of fake news and the narratives contained therein is taking place against the background of a significant transformation of the institutions of reputation and expertise. The widespread and rapid spread of unreliable narratives poses systemic threats to the development of modern economic orders in the face of emerging institutions of surveillance capitalism. Misinformation in alternative narratives is associated with the actions of interest groups that have the incentive to falsify past and present information about ongoing reforms, leading to a pluralistic reality. Through proto-narratives, knowledge of theories and models circulating in the academic environment is transmitted in a simplified form. Persistent myths about various aspects of the conduct and results of economic policies are also spread through proto-narratives. Unreliable or distorted proto-narratives are widespread in the social environment of the Russian innovation system. Examples of such narratives include neo-liberal myths about measuring efficiency through the number of patents or scientific rating publications. In the process of reforming the Russian innovation system, it is important to understand the genesis of the various proto-narratives and their influence on the formation of the institutional structure in the context of the specific features of its evolution.
16
Kortesoja, Matti. "Surveillance Capitalism." Tutkimus & kritiikki 4, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.55294/tk.144881.
Повний текст джерела
17
Breckenridge, Keith. "Capitalism without Surveillance?" Development and Change 51, no. 3 (May 2020): 921–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dech.12588.
Повний текст джерела
18
Borradaile, Glencora, and Joshua Reeves. "Sousveillance Capitalism." Surveillance & Society 18, no. 2 (June 17, 2020): 272–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v18i2.13920.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The striking commercial success of Shoshana Zuboff’s 2019 book, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, provides us with an excellent opportunity to reflect on how the present convergence of surveillance/capitalism coincides with popular critical and theoretical themes in surveillance studies, particularly that of sousveillance. Accordingly, this piece will first analyze how surveillance capitalism has molded the political behaviors and imaginations of activists. After acknowledging the theoretically and politically fraught implications of fighting surveillance with even more surveillance—especially given the complexities of digital capitalism’s endless desire to produce data—we conclude by exploring some of the political possibilities that lie at the margins of sousveillance capitalism (in particular, the extra-epistemological political value of sousveillance).
19
Łuczuk, Piotr, and Szymon Maj. "Influencer’s era–the role of experts in the digital world. Do we still need their forecasts and advice?" Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio 56, no. 4 (December 16, 2023): 147–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v56i4.1222.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Influencer’s era–the role of experts in the digital world. Do we still need their forecasts and advice? We live in an information society. Estimates show that by 2025 global data production will increase to over 180 zettabytes. Along with the dissemination of the Internet, the development of digital communication and the reduction of digital exclusion, we are facing a serious crisis of expert culture. Over the years, it is experts who played an important role in society, today we ask where the border between professionals and specialists with specific knowledge, and experts-soremen, who gather hundreds of thousands of thousands of users in front of the screens of mobile devices in front of the screens of mobile devices in front of the screens of mobile devices. In the course of consideration of the above issues, the authors decided to develop a new expert definition based on a review of literature together with the use of the syncretic method and the original research model. The latter was successfully used in previous studies. As part of the considerations on the indicated issues, the authors focus on four key phenomena: Influencer marketing development–as a new variety of the so -called expert sector; virtual exhibitionism in the context of surveillance capitalism; functioning of the expert sector in the Bigdata era; The role of experts- futurists reaching for the models of forecasting the future. Is there still room for experts in the thicket of data? The answer to this question is the key to defining who the expert of the future will be.
20
Greenlund, Kurt J., and Ray H. Elling. "Capital Sectors and Workers' Health and Safety in the United States." International Journal of Health Services 25, no. 1 (January 1995): 101–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/2gp3-2d9r-dy90-hkub.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The dual or segmented economy perspective suggests that the U.S. production system within a capitalist world-system can be divided into distinct sectors based on elements such as levels of industrial concentration, foreign involvement, and unionization. The differing organization of these sectors is argued to influence worker health and safety (WHS) outcomes. An economic segmentation model was applied to national occupational health data to examine the relationship between structural divisions in the economy and occupational hazard exposure, injury, and illness. Workers in more global industrial sectors had only average levels of hazardous exposure but a greater likelihood of occupational injury and illness than workers in other sectors of the economy. These differences are related to the structure of work in the various sectors. The findings suggest the need for (1) greater surveillance and reporting of WHS problems through the general health care system; (2) planning of economic and productive activity that takes WHS issues into account; and (3) greater worker organization and power within and between nations to improve WHS.
21
Lipartito, Kenneth. "Information, Surveillance, and Capitalism." Capitalism: A Journal of History and Economics 4, no. 1 (January 2023): 153–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cap.2023.a899274.
Повний текст джерела
22
Smith, Kyle Lauriston. "Thomas Aquinas, Ronald Dworkin, and the Fourth Revolution: The Foundations of Law in the Age of Surveillance Capitalism." Laws 12, no. 3 (April 28, 2023): 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/laws12030040.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Since the publication of Shoshana Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, the strategies of Surveillance Capitalists and appropriate responses to them have become common points of discussion across several fields. However, there is relatively little literature addressing challenges that Surveillance Capitalism raises for the foundations of law. This article outlines Surveillance Capitalism and then compares the views of Thomas Aquinas and Ronald Dworkin in four areas: truth and reality, reality and law, interpretation and social custom, and virtue and law; finally, it closes by asking whether the law alone can provide a sufficient response to Surveillance Capitalism. The overarching argument of the article is that, while Aquinas’s view of the foundations of law accounts for and responds to the challenges of Surveillance Capitalism more effectively than Dworkin’s, law alone cannot provide a sufficient response to this emerging phenomenon.
23
Doyuran, Elif Buse. "How to Destroy Surveillance Capitalism." Journal of Cultural Economy 14, no. 5 (May 24, 2021): 612–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1927150.
Повний текст джерела
24
Cinnamon, Jonathan. "Social Injustice in Surveillance Capitalism." Surveillance & Society 15, no. 5 (December 5, 2017): 609–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v15i5.6433.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
A rapidly accelerating phase of capitalism based on asymmetrical personal data accumulation poses significant concerns for democratic societies, yet the concepts used to understand and challenge practices of dataveillance are insufficient or poorly elaborated. Against a backdrop of growing corporate power enabled by legal lethargy and the secrecy of the personal data industry, this paper makes explicit how the practices inherent to what Shoshana Zuboff calls ‘surveillance capitalism’ are threats to social justice, based on the normative principle that they prevent parity of participation in social life. This paper draws on Nancy Fraser’s theory of ‘abnormal justice’ to characterize the separation of people from their personal data and its accumulation by corporations as an economic injustice of maldistribution. This initial injustice is also the key mechanism by which further opaque but significant forms of injustice are enabled in surveillance capitalism—sociocultural misrecognition which occurs when personal data are algorithmically processed and subject to categorization, and political misrepresentation which renders people democratically voiceless, unable to challenge misuses of their data. In situating corporate dataveillance practices as a threat to social justice, this paper calls for more explicit conceptual development of the social harms of asymmetrical personal data accumulation and analytics, and more hopefully, attention to the requirements needed to recast personal data as an agent of equality rather than oppression.
25
Lejo, Bergita P. Pricelia. "Kerentanan Perempuan dalam Surveillance Capitalism." Jurnal Wanita dan Keluarga 2, no. 2 (December 14, 2021): 65–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jwk.3616.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa kerentanan perempuan terhadap Kekerasan Gender Berbasis Online (KGBO) di dalam ruang digital. Studi ini menggunakan konsep kapitalisme pengawasan/surveillance capitalism dan symbolic violence sebagai dasar untuk memahami logika ekonomi dan juga kekerasan yang berlangsung dalam ruang digital. Ruang digital sebagai alat ekonomi tidak hanya menghasilkan “behavioral surplus” sebagai material baru tetapi juga menjadi ruang bagi terbentuknya “dominant habitus” tentang siapa itu perempuan dan bagaimana seharusnya perempuan merepresentasikan dirinya. Dominant habitus yang senantiasa direproduksi mampu menciptakan kebutuhan ekonomi bagi perempuan melalui komodifikasi dan bahkan eksploitasi terhadap tubuh perempuan yang terepresentasi dalam teks gambar, dan video di dalam platform digital. Melalui proses-proses ini, perempuan mengalami kekerasan simbolik yang terus-menerus direproduksi dalam dominant habitus. Dengan demikian, bekerjanya surveillance capitalism dan menguatnya dominant habitus di dalamnya menjadi kondisi yang membuka ruang bagi berlangsungya KGBO terhadap perempuan. Dengan menggunakan perspektif kritis dalam memandang KGBO tulisan ini hendak mendalami proses-proses yang mengkondisikan kerentanan perempuan di dalam ranah digital. Pemahaman akan hal-hal tersebut menjadi basis penting untuk memikirkan secara tepat posisi perempuan di dalam ruang digital yang saat ini secara luas diterima sebagai condition sine qua non yang di dalamnya berbagai bentuk relasi berlangsung. Dengan demikian, tulisan ini memberikan pijakan dasar untuk mendorong dan merumuskan beberapa agenda perubahan.
===
This paper aims to analyze women's vulnerability to Online-Based Gender Violence (KGBO) in the digital platform. This study uses the concept of surveillance capitalism and symbolic violence as a basis for understanding the economic logic and violence that takes place in today's digital platform. Digital platform as an economic tool not only produces a "behavioral surplus" as a new material, but also becomes a space for the formation of a "dominant habitus"; who is women are and how women should represent themselves. Dominant habitus which is always reproduced is able to create economic needs for women through commodification and even exploitation of women's bodies which are represented in text, images and videos on digital platforms. Throughout these processes, mostly women suffer from symbolic violence which persistently reproduced by the dominant habitus. It obviously reflects the vulnerability of woman as the victim of KGBO. By using a critical perspective in looking at KGBO, this paper intends to explore the process that put women’s vulnerability in the digital arena. Understanding of these matters becomes an important basis for thinking about the exact position of women in the digital space which is currently widely accepted as a condition sine qua non in which various forms of relations take place. Thus, this paper provides a basic basis for encouraging and formulating several agendas for change.
26
Sparkes, Matthew. "An end to 'surveillance capitalism'?" New Scientist 250, no. 3342 (July 2021): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0262-4079(21)01179-9.
Повний текст джерела
27
Sirotkin, V. B. "Decentralized money. Resisting surveillance capitalism." Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1 (71) (2022): 129–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2022-1-71-129-136.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Modern changes in centralized money are under consideration. It is shown that private electronic money (cryptocurrency) acts as a means of resistance to the increase of government control over people.
28
Gray, Chris H. "The threat of surveillance capitalism." Teknokultura. Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales 16, no. 2 (October 9, 2019): 265–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/tekn.64984.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Using Shoshana Zuboff’s 2019 book, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism, the essay explores this latest form of capitalism and Zuboff’s claims about its organization. Her arguments are compared and contrasted with David Eggers novel, and the movie that came out of it, called The Circle, as well as other perspectives on capitalism (Marx, Barry Unsworth’s Sacred Hunger) and the current dominance of social media companies (especially Alphabet/Google, Facebook, and Amazon) from Evgeny Morozov, Natasa Dow Schüll, Zeynep Tufekci, Steve Mann and Tim Wu. Zuboff’s description and critique of Surveillance Capitalism is a convincing and important addition to our understanding of the political economy of the early 21st Century and the role of giant monopolistic social media companies in shaping it.
29
Lipartito, Kenneth. "Surveillance Capitalism: Origins, History, Consequences." Histories 5, no. 1 (January 7, 2025): 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/histories5010002.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article investigates the early history and recent development of what is now termed surveillance capitalism. It argues that an underappreciated aspect of the surveillance of people and intensive data collection is a regularization of behavior that attempts to erase uncertainty. This process has been ongoing for more than a century, but its expansion through increasingly sophisticated digital technology and the widespread adoption of data gathering as a business strategy has the potential to stifle and inhibit the innovative entrepreneurship that is crucial to the capitalist system. How this will play out remains unclear, but history argues that we should look for ways to mitigate the potentially negative consequences of complex technological systems such as these.
30
Venkatesh, Nikhil. "Surveillance Capitalism: a Marx-inspired account." Philosophy 96, no. 3 (May 14, 2021): 359–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031819121000164.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
AbstractSome of the world's most powerful corporations practise what Shoshana Zuboff (2015; 2019) calls ‘surveillance capitalism’. The core of their business is harvesting, analysing and selling data about the people who use their products. In Zuboff's view, the first corporation to engage in surveillance capitalism was Google, followed by Facebook; recently, firms such as Microsoft and Amazon have pivoted towards such a model. In this paper, I suggest that Karl Marx's analysis of the relations between industrial capitalists and workers is closely analogous to the relations between surveillance capitalists and users. Furthermore, three problematic aspects of industrial capitalism that Marx describes – alienation, exploitation and accumulation – are also aspects, in new forms, of surveillance capitalism. I draw heavily on Zuboff's work to make these parallels. However, my Marx-inspired account of surveillance capitalism differs from hers over the nature of the exchange between users and surveillance capitalists. For Zuboff, this is akin either to robbery or the gathering of raw materials; on the Marx-inspired account it is a voluntary sale. This difference has important implications for the question of how to resist surveillance capitalism.
31
Curran, Dean. "Surveillance capitalism and systemic digital risk: The imperative to collect and connect and the risks of interconnectedness." Big Data & Society 10, no. 1 (January 2023): 205395172311776. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/20539517231177621.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Zuboff's The Age of Surveillance Capitalism provides a powerful analysis of the emergence of surveillance capitalism as a particular type of informational capitalism. Many of the important impacts of this project of creating larger and more integrated systems of ‘behavioural surplus’ are captured powerfully by Zuboff; yet as different risk and organisational scholars such as Beck, Perrow, and Vaughan have argued, integrated systems often do not function as intended. While the imperfection of these systems may raise the possibility that surveillance capitalism may not be as bad as Zuboff suggests, there is also a way in which these systems not functioning as intended can make surveillance capitalism an even more dystopian possibility. In this vein, this paper asks: what are the consequences when the tools of a surveillance capitalist society break down? This paper argues that it is by thinking through Zuboff's framework that we can identify the systemic fragility of a surveillance capitalist society. This systemic fragility emerges through how surveillance capitalism generates imperatives towards the maximal collection of data for exploitation, which in turn generates a corresponding imperative to connect all aspects of life. Both of these imperatives, of collect and connect, in turn create an immensely fragile digital system, which has vast ramifications throughout social life, such that small imperfections and gaps in the system can magnify risk throughout society.
32
Robinson, William T. "Adaptation of the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills Model to Needle Sharing Behaviors and Hepatitis C Risk." SAGE Open 7, no. 1 (January 2017): 215824401666612. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244016666126.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The current study adapts the Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills (IMB) model of health behavior to injection drug using risk behaviors and risk for Hepatitis C (HCV). Briefly, this model postulates that prevention behaviors are directly influenced by an individual’s knowledge about a disease, their motivation to avoid the disease and their skills and capacity to engage in prevention behaviors, while information and motivation also directly influence behavioral skills. Scales for HCV information, motivation and behavioral skills were included in the New Orleans arm of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) of Injection Drug Use study. A structural equation model was tested on a sample of 108 current injection drug users recruited in December 2012. Results showed good fit of the IMB model. Although participants had high levels of information and knowledge about HCV transmission, information was not found to relate to either behavioral skills or needle sharing. Higher levels of skills were directly related to lower levels of needle sharing. In addition, motivation had an indirect effect on needle sharing that was mediated through skills. Many approaches to HIV and HCV prevention focus on increasing awareness and information about HIV and risk behaviors. This model, however, appears to indicate that increasing awareness may not be as effective as interventions or programs that increase behavioral skills or motivation coupled with skills building. Although some HIV/STD prevention interventions, such as motivational interviews do attempt to capitalize on this relationship, more efforts should be made to incorporate this important link into high impact prevention programs.
33
Hegedűs, Dániel. "Felügyeleti kapitalizmus: disztópia vagy valóság?" Információs Társadalom 19, no. 1 (November 26, 2019): 130. http://dx.doi.org/10.22503/inftars.xix.2019.1.7.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Recenzió Shoshana Zuboff The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight For a Human Future At the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs, New York, 2019, 704 oldal, ISBN 9781610395700) című könyvéről.
---
Surveillance Capitalism: Dystopia or Reality?
Book review on Shoshana Zuboff: The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight For a Human Future At the New Frontier of Power (Public Affairs, New York, 2019, 704 pages, ISBN 9781610395700)
34
Charitsis, Vassilis, Detlev Zwick, and Alan Bradshaw. "Creating Worlds that Create Audiences: Theorising Personal Data Markets in the Age of Communicative Capitalism." tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 16, no. 2 (September 30, 2018): 820–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v16i2.1041.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In this article, we draw on theories of biopolitical marketing to explore claims that personal data markets are contextualised by what Shoshana Zuboff calls “surveillance capitalism” and Jodi Dean calls “communicative capitalism”. Surveillance and communicative capitalism are characterised by a logic of accumulation based on networked captures of life that enable complex and incomprehensive processes of extraction, commodification, and control. Echoing recent theorisations of data (as) derivatives, Zuboff’s key claim about surveillance capitalism is that data representations open up opportunities for the enhanced market control of life through the algorithmic monitoring, prediction and modification of human behaviour. A Marxist critique, focusing largely on the exploitative nature of corporate data capitalism, has already been articulated. In this article, we focus on the increasingly popular market-libertarian critique that proposes individual control, ownership, and ability to commodify one’s personal data as an answer to corporate data extraction, derivation and exploitation schemes. We critique the claims that personal data markets counterbalance corporate digital capitalism on two grounds. First, these markets do not work economically and therefore are unable to address the exploitative aspect of surveillance capitalism. Second, the notion of personal data markets functions ideologically because it reduces the critique of surveillance capitalism to the exploitation of consumers and conceals the real objective of data capitalists such as Google, Facebook, Amazon and Apple to not (just) exploit audiences but to create worlds that create audiences.
35
Fuchs, Christian. "Google Capitalism." tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 10, no. 1 (January 30, 2012): 42–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v10i1.304.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper analyzes Google’s political economy. In section 2, Google’s cycle of capital accumulation is explained and the role of surveillance in Google’s form of capital accumulation is explained. In section 3, the discussion if Google is “evil” is taken up. Based on Dallas Smythe’s concept of the audience commodity, the role of the notion of Internet prosumer commodification is stressed.
36
Fuchs, Christian. "Google Capitalism." tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 10, no. 1 (January 30, 2012): 42–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/vol10iss1pp42-48.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper analyzes Google’s political economy. In section 2, Google’s cycle of capital accumulation is explained and the role of surveillance in Google’s form of capital accumulation is explained. In section 3, the discussion if Google is “evil” is taken up. Based on Dallas Smythe’s concept of the audience commodity, the role of the notion of Internet prosumer commodification is stressed.
37
Corrêa, Murilo Duarte Costa, and Giuseppe Cocco. "Capitalismo de vigilância e lutas algorítmicas." MATRIZes 18, no. 1 (April 30, 2024): 105–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1982-8160.v18i1p105-125.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The recent literature on digital techniques has exploded in a spiral of denunciations against algorithms. They would be nothing but neoliberal techniques by which a new stage of capitalism would globally subsume societies, enclosing them in an infinite repetition guaranteed by data extraction and continuous surveillance. This essay problematizes surveillance capitalism – one of the main focal points of this debate. Furthermore, it repositions the split between surveillance and security in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of algorithmic struggles. As a result, we argue that surveillance capitalism hides the perspective of work and struggles, throwing us into political impasse and immobility.
38
Peša, Anita. "Private and Public in Surveillance Capitalism." Acta economica et turistica 8, no. 1 (June 27, 2022): 93–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.46672/aet.8.1.5.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The paper deals with the protection of the private and public spheres in surveillance capitalism. Predictions on consumer behaviour or the so-called behavioural surpluses are extracted from the set of collected (big) data of users/consumers from the so-called digital footprints, which become intelligence data, commodities on the data market. In addition to predicting user behaviour, various behavioural techniques push, or nudge users in a particular desired consumer or political direction or action, or dark nudge techniques when it comes to unauthorized data collection on users in the digital sphere. Surveiling and nudging users is done in the range from caring for their health, well-being and benefits, as well as general and public well-being, to encouraging expenditure, desired behaviour or voting in the desired direction of subjects who create such incentives (corporations, political parties, governments, etc.). The subject of the paper is based on behavioural economics which has introduced behavioural techniques in the field of public policy. The author proposes conceptual model of protective and active approach in the era of surveillance capitalism in the private and public spheres. An overview of the current digital regulation in the EU is given, and the need for further development of the legislative framework that will regulate the issues of supervision and protection of privacy and user data is pointed out.
39
Huberman, Jenny. "What to Do with Surveillance Capitalism?" Anthropology Now 12, no. 2 (May 3, 2020): 94–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19428200.2020.1824760.
Повний текст джерела
40
The Editors. "Notes from the Editors, May 2016." Monthly Review 68, no. 1 (April 30, 2016): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.14452/mr-068-01-2016-05_0.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
buy this issueA little less than two years ago, in July-August 2014, Monthly Review published a special summer issue under the title Surveillance Capitalism, edited by John Mage.… The lead article by Foster and McChesney was itself entitled "Surveillance Capitalism: Monopoly-Finance Capital, the Military-Industrial Complex, and the Digital Age." In Foster and McChesney's analysis, the problem of surplus absorption under monopoly capital was seen as having led to the development over the last seven decades of a massive surveillance network, extending across the sales effort, finance, and the military, and integral to the entire information economy.… We were therefore pleased to discover that the concept of "surveillance capitalism" has now entered the mainstream and is drawing considerable attention, through the work of Shoshana Zuboff, emeritus professor at the Harvard Business School.… " She failed, however, to mention the prior treatment of "surveillance capitalism" in Monthly Review, despite the fact that her analysis was written in November 2014—judging by her accessing of numerous articles on the Internet on that date—four months after the MR issue was published and posted online.…Click here to purchase a PDF version of this article at the Monthly Review website.
41
Bignoli, Callan, Sam Buechler, Deborah Caldwell, and Kelly McElroy. "Resisting Crisis Surveillance Capitalism in Academic Libraries." Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship 7 (December 15, 2021): 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.33137/cjalrcbu.v7.36450.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In this paper, we consider what we identify as crisis surveillance capitalism in higher education, drawing on the work of Naomi Klein and Shoshana Zuboff. We define crisis surveillance capitalism as the intersection of unregulated and ubiquitous data collection with the continued marginalization of vulnerable racial and social groups. Through this lens, we examine the twinned crisis narratives of student success and academic integrity and consider how the COVID-19 pandemic further enabled so-called solutions that collect massive amounts of student data with impunity. We suggest a framework of refusal to crisis surveillance capitalism coming from the work of Keller Easterling and Baharak Yousefi, identifying ways to resist and build power in a context where the cause of harm is all around and intentionally hidden.
42
Ball, Kirstie. "Review of Zuboff’s The Age of Surveillance Capitalism." Surveillance & Society 17, no. 1/2 (March 31, 2019): 252–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13126.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This essay reviews The Age of Surveillance Capitalism by Shoshanna Zuboff. The review explores the themes of the book and their intersection with surveillance studies. It focuses on how a securitisation lexicon pervades the text and on the ways in which insecurities drive the expansion of mass surveillance.
43
Nogueira Porto, Pedro Wilson. "Do Capitalismo de Vigilância ao Mito da Caverna: Uma Reflexão Marxista Contemporânea." Re(senhas) 1, no. 2 (December 17, 2024): e24020. https://doi.org/10.71263/1aq1p929.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This work leads us to a reflection on "Surveillance Capitalism" in the light of the "Myth of the Cave", using Plato's philosophy to analyze the contemporary world. The author must draw parallels between the myth of the cave and surveillance capitalism, showing how technology and the control of information can be used to manipulate and imprison consciences.
44
Zuboff, Shoshana, Norma Möllers, David Murakami Wood, and David Lyon. "Surveillance Capitalism: An Interview with Shoshana Zuboff." Surveillance & Society 17, no. 1/2 (March 31, 2019): 257–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ss.v17i1/2.13238.
Повний текст джерела
45
De Brito, Lucas. "ZUBOFF, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. New York: PublicAffairs, 2019, 691p. ISBN 9781610395694." Mural Internacional 12 (March 19, 2021): e55150. http://dx.doi.org/10.12957/rmi.2021.55150.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Shoshana Zuboff, em seu livro The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, perpassa pelas diversas funções e características do capitalismo de vigilância, conceito instrumentalizado pela autora e que diz respeito a uma nova ordem econômica baseada na extração de dados para a predição de comportamento capitaneada pelas grandes empresas de tecnologia. Através de vários exemplos e de uma narrativa bem fundamentada a autora mostra as consequências, na vida cotidiana, do aparato sofisticado utilizado para a modificação de comportamento.Palavras-chave: Capitalismo de vigilância; Big tech; Poder comportamental.ABSTRACTShoshana Zuboff, in her book The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, goes through the diverse functions and characteristics of surveillance capitalism, a concept instrumentalized by the author and which concerns a new economic order based on in data extraction to predict behavior led by large technology companies. Through several examples and a well-tied narrative, the author shows the consequences in everyday life of the sophisticated apparatus used for behavior modification.Key words: Surveillance capitalism; Big tech; Behavioral power. Recebido em: 09 out. 2020 | Aceito em: 23 jan. 2021.
46
Laniuk, Yevhen. "Freedom in the Age of surveillance capitalism: Lessons from Shoshana Zuboff." Ethics & Bioethics 11, no. 1-2 (June 1, 2021): 67–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ebce-2021-0004.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract The Age of surveillance capitalism is a profound economical, sociological, political, philosophical, and ethical work by the American author, Harvard University Professor Shoshana Zuboff. In this work, she analyzes the new economic system, which she calls “surveillance capitalism.” This system revolves around the commodification of personal data, which allows human behavior to be predicted and “nudged” towards profitable ends. This system is historically unprecedented and has only become possible in the technological milieu of interconnected devices, which appeared in the 21st century. In this article, I look at the issue of freedom in Zuboff’s work. I argue that her understanding of freedom involves three ethical dimensions, namely privacy, autonomy, and authenticity. I take “surveillance capitalism” as a theoretical framework, in which I explore several ethical challenges to freedom in the digital age.
47
West, Sarah Myers. "Data Capitalism: Redefining the Logics of Surveillance and Privacy." Business & Society 58, no. 1 (July 5, 2017): 20–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650317718185.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article provides a history of private sector tracking technologies, examining how the advent of commercial surveillance centered around a logic of data capitalism. Data capitalism is a system in which the commoditization of our data enables an asymmetric redistribution of power that is weighted toward the actors who have access and the capability to make sense of information. It is enacted through capitalism and justified by the association of networked technologies with the political and social benefits of online community, drawing upon narratives that foreground the social and political benefits of networked technologies. I examine its origins in the wake of the dotcom bubble, when technology makers sought to develop a new business model to support online commerce. By leveraging user data for advertising purposes, they contributed to an information environment in which every action leaves behind traces collected by companies for commercial purposes. Through analysis of primary source materials produced by technology makers, journalists, and business analysts, I examine the emergence of data capitalism between the mid-1990s and mid-2000s and its central role in the contemporary information economy.
48
Zuboff, Shoshana. "Big other: Surveillance Capitalism and the Prospects of an Information Civilization." Journal of Information Technology 30, no. 1 (March 2015): 75–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.5.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article describes an emergent logic of accumulation in the networked sphere, ‘surveillance capitalism,’ and considers its implications for ‘information civilization.’ The institutionalizing practices and operational assumptions of Google Inc. are the primary lens for this analysis as they are rendered in two recent articles authored by Google Chief Economist Hal Varian. Varian asserts four uses that follow from computer-mediated transactions: data extraction and analysis,’ ‘new contractual forms due to better monitoring,’ ‘personalization and customization, ’ and continuous experiments. ’ An examination of the nature and consequences of these uses sheds light on the implicit logic of surveillance capitalism and the global architecture of computer mediation upon which it depends. This architecture produces a distributed and largely uncontested new expression of power that I christen: Big Other. ’ It is constituted by unexpected and often illegible mechanisms of extraction, commodification, and control that effectively exile persons from their own behavior while producing new markets of behavioral prediction and modification. Surveillance capitalism challenges democratic norms and departs in key ways from the centuries-long evolution of market capitalism.
49
Baltezarević, Borivoje. "The need and limitations of media literacy and critical opinion in the age of supervisory capitalism." Megatrend revija 19, no. 1 (2022): 283–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/megrev2201283b.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The paper discusses the issue of modern society that functions mainly through new technologies. It points out the misconception that the Internet has provided safe and unlimited access to the world of knowledge and information and new modalities of creative expression. Time has shown that the use of modern technologies has led to the creation of new business models that are defined as surveillance capitalism, the emergence of which indicates the negative aspects of social media. Surveillance capitalism involves overseeing and compromising the privacy of the individual through the trade of personal data. The answer to this phenomenon is the potential role of critical thinking and media literacy. Critical thinking and media literacy are viewed in the context of national strategies and the individual aspect, while identifying existing potentials and constraints. Keywords: surveillance capitalism, media literacy, media education, critical thinking.
50
Siqueira, Érica S., Eduardo H. Diniz, and Marlei Pozzebon. "Surveilled Inclusion and the Pitfalls of Social Fintech Platforms." Journal of the Association for Information Systems 24, no. 5 (2023): 1292–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00815.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
While most studies on digital financial inclusion highlight its positive aspects, we focus on the surveillance phenomenon by investigating the role played by microcredit agents who operate digital financial platforms. We combine the concepts of surveillance capitalism and platform capitalism within the digital financial inclusion process and propose a surveilled inclusion model that considers the role of human agents interacting with clients to expand the network effects and control of the digital platform in a dialectic interplay. We combine an instrumental/in-depth case study and critical hermeneutics as methodological strategies to produce results that help to uncover the hidden agenda of social fintech organizations that use digital platforms to provide microcredit. In addition, we expand Zuboff’s concept of surveillance capitalism by including the role of microcredit agents who reinforce the imprisonment of clients in endless cycles of payment and credit renewal.