Добірка наукової літератури з теми "STILICONE"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "STILICONE".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "STILICONE"
Erba, Marco Emilio. "«Copiati esattissimamente in misura rigorosa»: note sulle prime incisioni dei dittici eburnei del Tesoro del Duomo di Monza. Anton Francesco Gori, Anton Francesco Frisi e i fratelli Trivulzio nella seconda metà del Settecento." ACME 75, no. 1 (March 16, 2023): 117–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.54103/2282-0035/19886.
Повний текст джерелаFrania, Henry E. "Larvae of Eustilicus Sharp, Rugilus Leach, Deroderus Sharp, Stilocharis Sharp, and Medon Stephens (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Paederini), and their phylogenetic significance." Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, no. 11 (November 1, 1986): 2543–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z86-375.
Повний текст джерелаFrania, Henry E. "Status of Eustilicus Sharp, Trochoderus Sharp, Deroderus Sharp, and Stilocharis Sharp (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Paederini) with implications for classification of the Medonina and Stilicina." Canadian Journal of Zoology 64, no. 2 (February 1, 1986): 467–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/z86-070.
Повний текст джерелаBrunel, Magali. "Stilicon de Thomas Corneille : du récit de la cruauté au plaisir galant de l'ingéniosité." Littératures classiques N° 77, no. 1 (2012): 213. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/licla.077.0213.
Повний текст джерелаAssing, Volker. "A revision of Panscopaeus (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae)." Beiträge zur Entomologie = Contributions to Entomology 61, no. 2 (November 10, 2011): 389–411. http://dx.doi.org/10.21248/contrib.entomol.61.2.389-411.
Повний текст джерелаWatts, John. "De Consulatu Stiliconis: texts and politics in the reign of Henry VI." Journal of Medieval History 16, no. 3 (January 1990): 251–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-4181(90)90005-l.
Повний текст джерелаŻyła, Dagmara, and Katarzyna Koszela. "Redescription of the genus Megastilicus Casey (Staphylinidae, Paederinae) with the description of a new species." European Journal of Taxonomy 778 (November 22, 2021): 138–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2021.778.1575.
Повний текст джерелаSTANIEC, BERNARD, EWA PIETRYKOWSKA-TUDRUJ, and DOROTA SAŁAPA. "Description of the egg and larva of Paederidus Mulsant & Rey, 1878 (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Paederinae) based on the two European species." Zootaxa 2888, no. 1 (May 24, 2011): 39. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2888.1.4.
Повний текст джерелаWilczyński, Marek. "Droga na szczyt i droga w otchłań – kilka uwag o karierze Flawiusza Stilichona." Vox Patrum 69 (December 16, 2018): 681–705. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/vp.3281.
Повний текст джерелаPottier, Bruno. "Un pamphlet contre Stilichon dans l’Histoire Auguste : la vie de Maximin Le Thrace." Mélanges de l’École française de Rome. Antiquité 117, no. 1 (2005): 223–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/mefr.2005.10947.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "STILICONE"
Cuzzone, Tullia. "L'invettiva contro Gildone.Motivi di propaganda politica e prassi letteraria.(Per un commento a Claud.carm.15)." Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Trieste, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/10077/2666.
Повний текст джерелаL’indagine ha permesso di mettere in luce la complessità di un poema che è prima di tutto un’opera a sostegno della politica di Stilicone e contiene un messaggio, duplice (di rimprovero e parenetico), inviato all’Oriente dell’Impero relativo alla necessaria concordia fra le due parti e fra i fratelli reggenti, Onorio e Arcadio. Claudiano eleva a dignità epica un episodio politico-militare la cui conclusione, più che da una vera e propria battaglia (che nella realtà non avvenne mai), era stato determinato dall’abile strategia di Stilicone. La specificità dell’opera consiste in una elevata cifra retorica dell’elemento panegiristico di cui si è fornita documentazione. La condanna di Stilicone come hostis publicus, da parte della corte orientale, obbliga il poeta ad assegnare al generale vandalo un ruolo di secondo piano e determina l’impossibilità di attribuirgli una responsabilità diretta nella risoluzione della vicenda gildonica. Tale condizionamento storico-politico si traduce in una strategia narrativa in cui il soggetto centrale del racconto diventa Gildone, il nemico o piuttosto l’anti-eroe, a cui si contrappone in modo implicito (esplicito raramente) proprio Stilicone. Stilicone incarna così l’eroe della tradizione romana, rispettoso della fides verso i familiari (in qualità di suocero di Onorio) e la patria. Le azioni del generale vandalo sono exempla di pietas e in netta antitesi con quelle di Gildone che però non compare mai come attore nella vicenda. L’opposizione tra i due si traduce in definitiva nella vittoria morale di Stilicone. Il generale vandalo, compie il suo ingresso nel finale del poema (352), preparato dall’encomio ad opera di Teodosio il Grande. Nel poema dunque la vittoria su Gildone non viene descritta mediante il racconto dei fatti, ma è sancita sul piano etico per mezzo della contrapposizione fra i due antagonisti. Il presente lavoro cerca di mettere in luce le ragioni che nell’In Gildonem hanno determinato il silenzio di Claudiano sugli antefatti e sulle operazioni in rapporto al più dettagliato resoconto della vicenda e al vero e proprio panegirico di Stilicone nella successiva Laus. Il confronto fra le due opere indurrebbe infatti a individuare nella prima una sorta di anticipazione dei motivi enfatizzati, senza reticenze, nella Laus. In questa prospettiva di lettura le due opere risultano complementari e ciò permetterebbe di superare la posizione della critica (Döpp 1980, Hajdu 1996-1997, Charlet 2000) che ritiene l’In Gildonem incompiuto tanto da ipotizzare la mancata pubblicazione di un secondo libro.
XX Ciclo
1980
Meunier, Delphine. "L’écriture épique chez Claudien : préserver l’épopée au IVe siècle ap. J.-C." Thesis, Paris 4, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA040141.
Повний текст джерелаThere is a clear epic vein in Claudian's apparently heterogeneous work, and it appears in a variety of ways. The poet clearly considers himself to be a uates, an heir to Homer, Ennius and Virgil, even though his subject matter is historical, not mythological. The language he uses is also strongly influenced by that of the epic genre, as exemplified by the use of a specifically epic lexicon and the resort to homeric similes. The way he builds on and renews traditional epic motifs (battle scenes, dreams, omens, miracles, prophecies, games ...) reveals the influence of the epic genre on his writings as well. Even though the ethics of heroism are undercut by the rise of Christian values, the divine and mythological figures that can be broached trough a typological reading are proof enough that the world of the epic is still very much present. All these elements contribute to a work that celebrates Roma Aeterna and Natura and is all at once epic – poetic and political. It thus appears that the epic vein is what unifies the corpus, and that the carmina maiora should be read as a political epic
Roussel, Patrick J. "Alaric : un barbare à l'habitus romain au tournant du 5e siècle." Thèse, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/15865.
Повний текст джерелаThis thesis hopes to demonstrate how Alaric and his Goths were Romans in virtually all that is known about them. To do this, the author has drawn from the social sciences to take the conceptual scope of the eminent sociologist Pierre Bourdieu. Using the concept of habitus, among other things, the author has tried to argue how Alaric’s ‘habits’ were similar to those of the Romans of his time. Naturally, the reasoning was spread over several chapters and on several levels. That is to say, it was first necessary to define the concepts popular at this time to "tell" the History of the Barbarians in Late Antiquity. We have to think here of terms such as ethnicity and ethnogenesis. The author has distanced himself from these concepts he thought ill-suited to the reality of the Goths and of Alaric. We should understand these men in a Roman structure, instead of granting them a History and/or barbaric traditions. He then had to show that the thesis explored avenues which have remained understudied until today. He had to start with Gibbon and work his way up the erudite chart while promoting the fact that some scholars had previously touched on Alaric as a man much less barbaric than the tradition was promoting, such as Fustel de Coulanges, Amédée Thierry and Marcel Brion. It was therefore important to validate the research angle by first acknowledging the place of these great scholars. Then came the major contribution of this thesis, that is to say essentially the sections B, C and D. Section B is focusing on the logistical side of Alaric’s story. This section have foremost allowed to demonstrate clearly that we are not dealing with a band of revolted brigands : the travel of 402 in Italy alone proves this fact. The detailed analysis of the routes taken by Alaric during his many trips demonstrates that the army could not have done all these movements without the support of the eastern court. In that case, Alaric and his army were truly Roman soldiers and not just the barbarous federated people of the tradition. Section C focus on Alaric's Goths where one can find two chapters covering two distinct areas: Origin/Migration and Comparison. It is in this section that the author attempts to support the hypothesis that the Goths of Alaric were not really Goths but rather Romans. The chapter on migration had the goal to break down many assumptions about this gothic tradition that scholars like Wolfram and Heather are still trying to defend. The author argues to see Alaric's Goths as a group formed from Roman elements; to know if in fact any of them was of barbarian stock is irrelevant to the end result : these men had lived in the Empire throughout their entire lives (Alaric included) and their habitus could not have been anything other than Roman. The last chapter of Section C showed without any doubt that the group of Alaric was firstly deeply different from the Goths of 376-382, but then also from other groups that are said to have been barbarians at the turn of the fifth century, as were the Vandals and Alamanni for example. Together, these three chapters cover the totality of what is known about the group of Alaric and offers fresh interpretation following the last trends in social sciences. The section D is for its part an in-depth analysis of Alaric and his place in the Roman Empire. The author has demonstrated above all, relying on sources, that Alaric was not a Goth nor a king. He then analyzed the role of Alaric in the power structure of the Empire and came to the conclusion that he was one of the most important men of the Eastern Empire between 397 and 408, while still being totally dependant on that structure. His whole military career up to 397 was unassuming and was part of the Roman military habitus of the time. He also showed that by his actions, Alaric was also as Roman as Stilicho. To tell the truth, apart from Claudian, nothing could tell us that Alaric was a barbarian and was trying to destroy the Empire. The bad image of Alaric is liable only to Claudian alone : no contemporary writer did draw such a dark portrait of him. It follows that subsequent authors who made Alaric the king of the Goths and the destructor of Greece must had followed Claudian as well.
Книги з теми "STILICONE"
Mazzarino, Santo. Stilicone: La crisi imperiale dopo Teodosio. 2nd ed. Milano: Rizzoli, 1990.
Знайти повний текст джерелаFinis: Onore e morte di Stilicone : romanzo. Milano: Ares, 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаPrima della notte: Stilicone, l'ultimo difensore dell'impero romano : romanzo. Milano: Ares, 2001.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMagrı̀, Rosario. Prima della notte: Stilicone, l'ultimo difensore dell'impero romano : romanzo. Milano: Ares, 2001.
Знайти повний текст джерелаLorenzo, Pecchioni, ed. Stilicone: La battaglia di Fiesole e il tesoro di Radagasio. Firenze: Press & Archeos, 2010.
Знайти повний текст джерелаCimino, Gianfranco. L'esercito romano da Stilicone a Giustino I: Collasso e sopravvivenza 395-527 d.C. Rome]: Edizioni Chillemi, 2020.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "STILICONE"
Sigayret, Lucien. "Les deux voyages de Stilichon." In Bouleversants voyages, 85–100. Presses universitaires de Perpignan, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.pupvd.29079.
Повний текст джерела