Готові списки джерел за темами / State dispute Settlement

Зміст

  1. Статті в журналах
  2. Дисертації
  3. Книги
  4. Частини книг
  5. Тези доповідей конференцій
  6. Звіти організацій

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "State dispute Settlement"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 11 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "State dispute Settlement".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "State dispute Settlement"

1

KANG, Taewook. "Problems of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS)." Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics 10, no. 2 (2020): 561. http://dx.doi.org/10.14505//jarle.v10.2(40).16.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The research deals with Problems of Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) focused on Investment Arbitration. The author especially focuses on the problems under BIT (Bilateral Investment Treaties) and FTA (Free Trade Agreements. Mentioned in this article, International investment disputes are generated due to host countries and foreign investors. ISDS is Dispute settlements between investors and countries. This is not suit proceedings but arbitration proceedings. That is, ‘activities of the third party to arbitrate and settle disputes by intervening between parties in dispute. ’However, Dispute Settlement through this way, is it really reasonable and fair system? If it is indeed fair and reasonable system, advanced countries like the United States and Australia would not have abandoned it. Therefore, the investment arbitration system is never a dispute settlement proceeding that has been verified and stabilized internationally.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Marmazov, Vasyl, and Pavlo Pushkar. "The Right of Access to Non-State Dispute Resolution in the Legal Order of Larger Europe: A Yardstick to Harmonise Approaches to State and Non-State Dispute Settlement in Ukraine." NaUKMA Research Papers. Law 7 (July 20, 2021): 33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.18523/2617-2607.2021.7.33-43.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The Ukrainian legal thought has traditionally regarded the right of access to justice as a right of access to the State court, or to State managed or controlled procedures for dispute settlement. One of the main reasons for that was that the non-state, or uncontrolled by the State dispute settlement was not formally permitted, prohibition being imposed by the Soviet system and even to a certain extent during the period of domination on parts of the territory of the modern Ukraine, of the various externally imposed requirements of various legal systems in force at the material time. Non-state dispute settlement in its traditional forms, mainly based on the custom, was also left outside the attention in the pre-Soviet times and could not find its dignified place between accessible schemes and instruments for dispute settlement. Moreover, the understanding that justice delivery for the parties to the dispute should remain within State monopoly, became commonly accepted as from 1996. The adoption of the Constitution of Ukraine to a certain extent perverted approach to settlement of conflicts, focusing on the main role for the State courts, to these ends. In particular, the courts are having “direct jurisdiction” over any dispute, this led to perception of pre-trial settlements as unnecessary, even as regards those that remained in force, notably, the commissions on labour disputes that were recognized in the case-law of the European Court as equating in legal force to binding and enforceable legal instruments. Thus, the traditional historical approach to seeing judicial examination of disputes as an exceptional step in dispute settlement, in the absence of agreement or settlement by the parties, notably through mediation, arbitration or conciliation, variousforms of third party involvement, steadily disappeared. However, alternative examination of disputes is returning back to its original standing. It is gaining its place in the discussions on the judicial reform and reform of the system for settlement of disputes. This reform is far from being finalised and possibly has not even started in practice. The new approach to settlement of disputes, aimed at breaking the principle of State monopoly on examination of disputes and seeing State dispute settlement by court as an exception, is still not firmly entrenched into the mentality of lawyers, public servants, judges, law enforcement employees and politicians in Ukraine. Thus, the article suggests and points out to importance of taking into account with these changes of a wider European perspective. Such a perspective should relate not only to theoretical and practical advantages of the non-state dispute settlement, but also provides that the privatisation of the dispute settlement procedures and breaking the state monopoly on it, is a part of wider international obligations, also being a part of the supranational legal order of the European Union. This obligation of Ukraine is also seen as part of the requirements stemming from the Council of Europe law. Both the EU law and the Council of Europe provide for extensive soft law recommendations, legal principles, which are formed by the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Such an approach provides that alternative means of dispute settlement, including arbitration, do not run contrary to the principles of human rights with regard to fair judicial proceedings. On the contrary, they could be seen as a highly relevant actual means of dispute settlement for any modern European society, built on the principles of respect to rule of law and human rights.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Dong, Limin. "Why International Conciliation Can Resolve Maritime Disputes: A Study Based on the Jan Mayen Case." Sustainability 15, no. 3 (2023): 1830. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su15031830.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The settlement of maritime disputes is an important issue faced by many countries. Choosing an appropriate settlement method is the primary task of policy makers. International conciliation, which results from careful and systematic evaluation, could become the primary choice of dispute settlement. During conciliation, parties have dominant and final decision-making power over the settlement of disputes, and there is flexibility in the application of law and procedural rules. The Conciliation Commission provides independent third-party advice, and the political and time costs of dispute settlements are relatively low. These are core advantages of conciliation that attract the attention of decision makers. The willingness and diplomatic relations of disputing parties, existence of external pressure, economization of delimitation, and capacity of the Commission are key factors that affect the success of conciliation. The roles these factors play depend on their controllability and the strength of the disputing parties. The effects of dispute settlement with the assistance of the Conciliation Commission are systemic. The successful settlement of maritime disputes between Norway and Iceland in the context of the Cold War not only demonstrated that conciliation is of great value in resolving maritime disputes and promoting inter-state relations but also had considerable uniqueness. Many questions regarding international conciliation cannot be clearly answered by the Jan Mayen Case. Increased state practice and further in-depth research are needed.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Khan, Ali Nawaz, Zaheer Iqbal Cheema, and Jawwad Riaz. "Role of Actors and Factors for the Emergence of Contemporary Regime of Investor-State Dispute Settlement." Global Management Sciences Review V, no. IV (2020): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gmsr.2020(v-iv).05.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Dispute resolution mechanism happened to be the fundamental aspect of the protectionist discourse of foreign investment. The consistent efforts were rolled out on behalf of international economic organizations such as UNO, OECD and IBRD of World Bank Group for the establishment of an impartial forum for the settlement of investment disputes. The opposite approaches of capital-exporting developed economies and less developed recipients of foreign capital lead certain attempts to failure to build consensus for dispute resolution mechanism relating to foreign investments. The World Bank started its effort for a specialized forum for investor-state dispute settlements in 1961. This effort remained successful in building consensus for exclusive jurisdiction for investment disputes. The members of the World Bank Group adopted the international convention on the settlement of investment disputes between states and nationals of other states, 1965, i.e. ICSID Convention. The paper has concluded that the efforts of international organizations and the large-scale recognition of the ICSID mechanism have ensured the legitimacy of the system.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Jyoti and A. S. Sidhu. "Satisfaction of Textile Workers with Awards/Settlements: An Empirical Analysis." Management and Labour Studies 30, no. 3 (2005): 236–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0258042x0503000303.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The Indian industrial relations model is based on the free enterprise-cum-planning-cum-growing public sector-cum parliamentary democracy model of growth. For the purpose of securing peace in industry and to give a fair deal to the workers, Indian industrial relations system has also designed different organs for the settlement of industrial disputes. Two methods are generally followed in the state of Punjab as well as in the country as a whole to deal with the industrial disputes viz., (1) Direct settlement, and (2) Third party settlement. A number of studies have been carried out to evaluate the performance of dispute settlement at the state and national levels. However authors feel that efficiency is not the only criterion to analyse the performance of dispute settlement machinery. Effectiveness, i.e., whether it makes parties, especially the workers, satisfied with those awards/settlements, can be another criterion to evaluate the performance of dispute settlement machinery. The present study has been carried out to address this question. For this purpose an attempt has been made to identify the factors which discriminates the satisfied/dissatisfied group of workers with awards/ settlements. Stepwise discriminant analysis has found that out of thirteen variables only three variables, i.e., marital status of workers, awareness about past agreements, and preference for the method of settlement, have emerged as significant variables to predict the profile of satisfied workers in textile industry of Punjab. Hence, the null hypothesis that no significant difference exists in the profile of two groups in regard to their satisfaction level is rejected.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Kelam, Ivica. "Investor to State Dispute Settlement." Synthesis philosophica 34, no. 1 (2019): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21464/sp34105.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Until recently, international trade agreements did not cause any public reaction and were considered irrelevant to everyday life. The experience of the existing international trade agreements from NAFTA, through TPP, to TTIP and CETA, which are in the process of negotiations or ratification, has shown that they have a huge impact on the daily lives of citizens and affect the entire society and economy. These agreements are negotiated and concluded by neglecting ethical principles, democratic procedures, and human rights, where only economic interests are taken into account. In this paper we will explore how these agreements undermine universal ethical principles and democratic standards through the ISDS mechanism, imposing the economic interest of large capital against the welfare of society, the individual, and the environment. We will refer particularly to the work of Alfred-Maurice de Zayas, the United Nations Independent Expert on the Promotion of a Democratic and Equitable International Order (also known as Special Rapporteur), who in his reports to the United Nations General Assembly and in media appearances fiercely criticises the ISDS mechanism and its implementation in agreements such as CETA and TTIP.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Kugler, Kholofelo. "The AfCFTA’s Success Depends on Effective Dispute Settlement Mechanisms for the Private Sector." Global Trade and Customs Journal 16, Issue 11/12 (2021): 558–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/gtcj2021070.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The state-to-state nature of the dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) of the Agreement Establishing the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) could serve as a barrier to ensuring dispute resolution under this regional trade agreement. African countries’ low participation in trade dispute resolution at the World Trade Organization (WTO) and within their own regional economic communities (RECs) indicates that these countries either do not have the capacity to resolve trade issues through contentious litigation or those types of dispute settlement mechanisms are not suited to their needs. However, it is important that the AfCFTA ecosystem provides effective and efficient dispute settlement options for the commercial operators that will seek to take advantage of the benefits of the trade agreement. The AfCFTA non-tariff barrier (NTB) Online Monitoring Mechanism is a welcomed addition to the options available to the private sector. However, AfCFTA State Parties must resolve the complaints lodged on that platform swiftly and adequately. In the absence of continental or regional dispute resolution options, it is foreseen that domestic courts will play a large role in adjudicating AfCFTA-related disputes. Therefore, the options that State Parties could avail to private parties include establishing or capacitating commercial courts and arbitration centres to effectively adjudicate AfCFTA-related disputes. Africa, AfCFTA, dispute settlement, DSU, state-to-state, private sector, direct access, domestic courts, arbitration
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

ALLEE, TODD L., and PAUL K. HUTH. "Legitimizing Dispute Settlement: International Legal Rulings as Domestic Political Cover." American Political Science Review 100, no. 2 (2006): 219–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0003055406062125.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
We develop and test a general argument about the conditions under which state leaders are most likely to choose legal dispute resolution over bilateral negotiations as a means to settle international disputes. Our central claim is that leaders who anticipate significant domestic audience costs for the making of voluntary, negotiated concessions are likely to seek the “political cover” of an international legal ruling. In such cases, it will be easier for leaders to justify the making of concessions if they are mandated as part of a ruling by an international court or arbitration body. We test a series of domestic-level hypotheses using a dataset comprised of nearly 1,500 rounds of talks concerning disputed territorial claims. Our multivariate analyses indicate that state leaders opt for legal dispute resolution when they are highly accountable to domestic political opposition, as well as when the dispute is highly salient to domestic audiences.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Lee, Jaemin. "Dispute Settlement Mechanisms in U.S. FTAs with Korea, Panama, Peru and Colombia: Basic Designs, Key Characteristics and Implications." British Journal of American Legal Studies 5, no. 2 (2016): 487–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/bjals-2016-0017.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract The United States concluded free trade agreements (FTAs) with Korea, Peru, Panama and Colombia in late 2000s. Since the four FTAs were negotiated and concluded largely contemporaneously, key traits and characteristics of the agreements are similarly formulated. In light of this, dispute settlement mechanisms (state-to-state dispute settlement proceedings, investor-state dispute settlement proceedings, and Joint Committees) of the four FTAs also share commonalities. At the same time, new ideas and suggestions are explored in the four FTAs. While issues and disputes under the four FTAs have arguably not been ripe for the constitution of dispute settlement proceedings under the FTAs at the moment, sooner or later they are likely to end up in the dockets of the respective proceedings. The key elements of the four FTAs’ dispute settlement mechanisms are also adopted in other FTAs that the United States have concluded afterwards including most recently the Trans-Pacific Partnership, since these elements are reflective of the general scheme of the United States in their FTAs. What remains to be seen is how the general scheme of dispute settlement proceedings can be applied and implemented in actual settings when the FTAs produce increasing numbers of disputes in the future. In particular, marked disparity in human and financial resources between the United States and the four FTA’s parties may bring about disparate impacts and consequences among contracting parties. Continued attention needs to be paid to the development concerning implementation of the four FTAs, in particular their dispute settlement proceedings.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Serdiuk, Olexandr Vasiliovich, and Georgiy Viktorovich Grabchak. "Problematic issues of submitting of counterclaims in International centre for settlement of investment disputes." Problems of Legality, no. 155 (December 20, 2021): 238–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.21564/2414-990x.155.239558.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The counterclaim institute is one of crucial legal defense options during the dispute settlement in domestic and international jurisdictions; investment arbitration is not an exception. The most famous dispute settlement platform is International centre for settlement of investment disputes (ICSID). One of the key ideas of establishment of such a dispute settlement instrument was an implementation of autonomous and objective system of Investor-states dispte sttlement (ISDS) by the “independent forum”. While procedural rights of ISDS parties are conceptually equal. However, the concept of equal procedural rights of ISDS parties has not been translated into reality. Notwithstanding the fact that the counterclaim institute is an important instrument of ensuring the objectivity and comprehensiveness of the dispute settlement, tribunal`s approaches are “restrictive” and “cautious”.Taking into account that States are “perpetual respondent” in ICSID, problematic issues of submitting of counterclaims influence the realization of interest of the State in ICSID. Problematic issues of submitting of counterclaims clearly show the imbalance of the exercise of procedural rights by the respondent-state.The article is intended to draw the attention of readers to problematic issues of submitting of counterclaims in ICSID and on the alternative view of the isuue.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Дисертації з теми "State dispute Settlement"

1

Koopmans, Sven Michael George. "Diplomatic dispute settlement : the use of inter-state conciliation." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2007. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.670090.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Nowakowski, Jesse. "A Critical Examination of Investor State Dispute Settlement in Canada." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/39144.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This study critically examines rulings of Investor State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) tribunals. Under the North American Free Trade Agreement’s (NAFTA) Chapter 11, ISDS provides foreign investors with the tools to launch a claim against signatory countries should they feel their investment was inhibited by local regulations. Empirically this study draws upon Windstream Energy LLC. v. the Government of Canada as a case study to analyze the competing responses exchanged during the tribunal’s hearings. The claim by Windstream Energy LLC against the Government of Ontario (GoO) serves as both a central and relevant example for examining the ramifications of ISDS, as it is one of Canada’s most recent defeats featuring the largest award outside a pre-tribunal ISDS settlement. Information was drawn from tribunal documents, referred to as a Memorial and Counter Memorial, which outline each party’s argument and supporting claims. Additionally, the tribunal publishes their final decision and justifications. A critical discourse analysis method, theoretically informed by the corporate crime literature and Gramsci’s theory of hegemony, helps in critically examining the economic, political, and cultural assumptions that influenced the tribunal’s decision and the state’s approach to foreign investment. Overall, dominant voices reinforced neoliberal beliefs about transnational market expectations and the role of the state under a globalized capitalist system. Justifications rooted in market logics prioritized the accumulation of foreign capital over the potential dangers of Windstream’s project. Ultimately, it is the inclusion of corporate safeguards, like ISDS, in free trade pacts that help to (re)produce neoliberal capitalist ideals and further reinforce status-quo economic relations.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Martin, Sara <1996&gt. "BRI e Investor - State Dispute Settlement: verso una nuova direzione?" Master's Degree Thesis, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10579/19384.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Con l’implemento del progetto cinese della Via della Seta è emersa la necessità di individuare un meccanismo di risoluzione delle controversie appropriato, in grado di regolare i rapporti tra gli stati coinvolti. I trattati bilaterali d’investimento stipulati nei primi anni del XXI secolo secondo il diritto internazionale vedevano per lo più l’impiego del Centro per la Risoluzione delle Dispute in materia di Investimenti (ICSID) e di altri organismi delle Nazioni Unite. L’affermazione della Cina come nuova potenza economica globale e l’adesione di numerosi Paesi Europei e Asiatici all’iniziativa Belt and Road, hanno fatto emergere la necessità di un diritto e un regolamento creati ad hoc per la regolazione dei rapporti economici e commerciali tra gli attori coinvolti, in virtù di una nuova concezione di cooperazione inter statale e di sviluppo. Attraverso l’analisi qualitativa degli organismi internazionali di risoluzione delle controversie convenzionali e recenti, questa tesi si propone di indagare la necessità o meno della creazione di nuove istituzioni e organismi che regolino le dispute tra i paesi aderenti al progetto cinese.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Mlauzi, Dumisani G. "Solutions to investor-state dispute settlement : Republic of South Africa vis-à-vis Australia." Thesis, University of the Western Cape, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11394/5520.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Magister Legum - LLM<br>The main objective of this paper is to critically analyse the solutions that countries are currently implementing in response to the much-debated issue that the conventional investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) regime limits a host-state's space to make regulations under public policy. Consequently, the paper makes recommendations on viable solutions that countries can implement as solutions to the ISDS problems. In order to conduct the study, this paper uses the solutions to ISDS problems that have been implemented by the Republic of South Africa (RSA) and Australia respectively. The paper also compares the solutions implemented by RSA and Australia with some internationally recognised solutions. Chapters two and three of the paper discuss the backgrounds and also analyse the solutions to ISDS that have been implemented by RSA and Australia respectively. Chapter four contains the main findings and arguments of the paper. It analyses the strengths and weaknesses of the ISDS solutions that have been implemented by RSA and Australia respectively. One of the main findings of the paper is that retaining the conventional ISDS regime is less beneficial to developing and least developed countries and more beneficial to developed countries, largely due to the differing levels of outward investments that are present in these categories of countries. The paper recommends, inter alia, that, unlike developed countries, developing countries and least-developed countries should abrogate the conventional ISDS regime and only retain it in particular circumstances as explained in chapter five. The paper recommends that ISDS should only be utilised where state-state arbitration would unnecessarily politicise an investment dispute. The paper also finds the use of domestic court as undesirable to investment disputes. The paper recommends mediation as a more balanced avenue for resolving investment disputes.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Knahr, Christina. "Participation of non-state actors in the dispute settlement system of the WTO: benefit or burden? /." Frankfurt am Main [u.a.] : Lang, 2007. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/525118349.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Dani, Mojtaba. "The Perception of Bias in the Energy Case Law Within the Investor–State Dispute-Settlement System." Thesis, Griffith University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365257.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The investor–state dispute-settlement (ISDS) system has been suffering a crisis of legitimacy, arising inter alia from the perception among some states that the system is biased in favour of foreign investors. This perception of bias has emerged from a range of disputes over the last decade, particularly in the energy sector. While the case data show that states prevail more often than investors,1 the issue remains that a sense of disaffection with the system is continuing to deepen. Therefore, this thesis addresses the following research question: Is the perception of bias among some states well-founded and valid? Given this legitimacy crisis, there is a need to explore the grounds of the perception of bias, and offer remedies for jurisprudential and doctrinal problems in the ISDS system. The study analyses doctrinal developments within the ISDS system to explore the perception of bias. It examines bias through the ways in which the treaty norms and standards are crafted, applied and interpreted in the investment treaty system, which the study refers to as ‘systemic bias’. Further, it argues that the ways in which the doctrines emerging within the ISDS system are being developed actively facilitate the perception of systemic bias. Therefore, the question of perceived bias must be addressed by exploring the development of doctrines, and how they are interpreted and applied.<br>Thesis (PhD Doctorate)<br>Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)<br>Griffith Law School<br>Arts, Education and Law<br>Full Text
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Falsafi, Alireza. "Applicable law in state contracts : the drive to create a supranational legal regime in international arbitral dispute settlement." Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=19623.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This thesis addresses the question of the application of a supra-national legal regime to the substance of disputes arising from State contracts in the context of international arbitral dispute settlement. Foreign private parties seek to subject the merits of their contractual relationships with a State arising from a State contract to a legal regime superior to the national law of the State party. Such a supra-national legal regime has been advanced through a de-localization trend in international arbitration. In the main, the de-localization trend defies a jurisdictional concept of the legal regime governing a State contract with a view to dissociating the contract from the legal jurisdiction of the State party. How paradoxical the idea of subjecting the substance of a State contract to a Stateless legal regime proves is an issue that the present thesis embarks upon.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

ZORATTO, LAURA DE CASTRO. "DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM UNDER NAFTA AND MERCOSUL: DETERMINING LOGICS AND THEIR REFLEXES ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATE AND ENTERPRISE." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2004. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=5230@1.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
FUNDAÇÃO DE APOIO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO<br>A dissertação analisa os acordos de integração do Nafta e do Mercosul, especialmente a estrutura institucional e o mecanismo de solução de controvérsias de cada um deles. O trabalho analisa ainda como a lógica determinante de cada acordo afetou sua institucionalidade, criando marcos distintos para a relação entre Estado e empresa em cada bloco. Para tal, duas controvérsias solucionadas no âmbito de cada acordo foram selecionadas para análise, buscando dar destaque à atuação dos Estados e das empresas envolvidas no conflito. Percebeu-se que o acordo de integração norte-americano concede amplos e pioneiros benefícios aos investidores estrangeiros, de acordo com a lógica hegemônica estadunidense, enquanto o acordo do o Mercosul estabelece um mecanismo de solução de controvérsia essencialmente estatal, na tentativa de prover seus membros com um projeto contra-hegemônico, no qual a harmonia entre os mesmos é crucial para o sucesso do acordo.<br>The dissertation analyses the North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta) and the Mercosul agreement (the South-American Agreement), especially the institutional structure and the dispute settlement mechanism of each agreement. The paper also analyses how the determining logic of each agreement affected its institutionality, creating different patterns for the relationship between State and enterprise. For this purpose, two controversies resolved under each agreement were selected for analysis, emphasizing the role played by states and enterprises involved in the conflict. It was noticed that the North-American agreement concedes broad and new benefits to the foreign investors, according to the U.S hegemonic position. Mercosul, on the other hand, implemented an essentially State-based dispute settlement mechanism, in an attempt to provide its members with an anti-hegemonic project, in which the harmony among them is crucial for the Mercosul`s success.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Garcia-Rubio, Mariano. "On the application of customary rules of state responsibility by the WTO dispute settlement organs : a general international law perspective /." Genève : IUHEI, 2001. http://www.gbv.de/dms/sbb-berlin/328957178.pdf.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Garcia, Rubio Mariano. "On the application of customary rules of state responsibility by the WTO dispute settlement organs : a general international law perspective /." Genève : Institut universitaire de hautes études internationales, 2001. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb377248004.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "State dispute Settlement"

1

Development, United Nations Conference on Trade and. Dispute settlement: State-State. United Nations, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Nations, United, ed. Investor-state dispute settlement. United Nations, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Dispute settlement: Investor-State. United Nations, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, and Michele Potestà. Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts. Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Diplomatic dispute settlement: The use of inter-state conciliation. T.M.C. Asser, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development., ed. Investor-state dispute settlement and impact on investment rulemaking. United Nations, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Molinuevo, Martín. Protecting investment in services: Investor-state arbitration versus WTO dispute settlement. Kluwer Law International, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Protecting investment in services: Investor-state arbitration versus WTO dispute settlement. Kluwer Law International, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Rubio, Mariano Garcia. On the application of customary rules of state responsibility by the WTO dispute settlement organs: A general international law perspective. Graduate Institute of International Studies, 2001.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Tufte, Per Arne. Velkommen til velferdsstaten?: Gjeldsordningsloven i et rettferdighetsperspektiv = Welcome to the welfare state? : how fair is the Debt Settlement Act? Statens institutt for forbruksforskning, 1993.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "State dispute Settlement"

1

Núñez, Jorge E. "Dispute settlement." In Territorial Disputes and State Sovereignty. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429273254-5.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Koopmans, Sven M. G. "The Development of Inter-State Conciliation." In Diplomatic Dispute Settlement. T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-675-6_3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Koopmans, Sven M. G. "The Use of Inter-State Conciliation." In Diplomatic Dispute Settlement. T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-675-6_6.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Anthony VanDuzer, J., and Patrick Dumberry. "Investor–state dispute settlement." In Promoting and Managing International Investment. Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429059957-11.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Zhao, Longyue. "Investor-State Dispute Settlement." In Modern China and International Rules. Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7576-9_7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Koopmans, Sven M. G. "Diplomatic Dispute Settlement AND INTER-STATE CONCILIATION." In Diplomatic Dispute Settlement. T.M.C. Asser Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-675-6_2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Zhao, Chunlei. "Analyzing the State-to-State Dispute Settlement System in the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment." In International Investment and Dispute Settlement. Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003226352-2.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Mondré, Aletta. "The Effects of International Dispute Settlement Procedures." In State Transformations in OECD Countries. Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137012425_5.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Oellers-Frahm, Karin, and Andreas Zimmermann. "European Tribunal in Matters of State Immunity." In Dispute Settlement in Public International Law. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56626-4_74.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Nichols, Shawn. "Investor-State Dispute Settlement Mechanisms and Imperialism." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism. Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91206-6_143-1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "State dispute Settlement"

1

Fu, Lixiao. "Legal review on investor-state dispute settlement under TPP." In 2016 3rd International Conference on Modern Economic Technology and Management. Asian Academic Press Co., Limited, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24104/rmhe/2017.02.02003.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Brodlija, Fahira, and Lidija Šimunović. "THE PATH OF (R)EVOLUTION OF THE INTERNATIONAL INVESTOR STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT REGIME." In EU 2020 – lessons from the past and solutions for the future. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/11929.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Zhang, Wei. "The Hierarchy of Remedies Under the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Its Impact." In 3rd International Conference on Judicial, Administrative and Humanitarian Problems of State Structures and Economic Subjects (JAHP 2018). Atlantis Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/jahp-18.2018.147.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Sudihar, Arie, I. G. A. K. Rachmi Handayani, and Waluyo Pujiyono. "The Practical Settlement of Norm Dispute Upon Separated State Assets in The Limited Company of Stated-Owned Enterprise." In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019). Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/icglow-19.2019.69.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Kršňáková, Hana. "The Singapore Convention: A Giant Leap for Mediation or Just Too Good to Be True." In COFOLA International 2022. Masaryk University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p280-0231-2022-3.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In this article, the author will explore the potential of the United Nations Convention on International Settlement Agreements Resulting from Mediation, also known as the “Singapore Convention on Mediation” in reaching its desired goal – becoming an essential instrument in the facilitation of international trade and support the wide recognition of mediation as an international and domestic commercial dispute resolution practice. Hence becoming what was and still is the United Nations Convention of 10 June 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards for the international trade arbitration. Through the analysis of the history and current state of the Singapore Convention, its guiding provisions, and their correlation with the basic principles of mediation, the author will evaluate the utilization and legitimacy of international business mediation in cross-border disputes after the Singapore Convention.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Petrović, Milena. "MINI SUĐENjE (MINI – TRIAL) – NOVI TALAS U REŠAVANjU MEĐUNARODNIH PRIVREDNIH SPOROVA." In XV Majsko savetovanje: Sloboda pružanja usluga i pravna sigurnost. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xvmajsko.887p.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The mini - trial is an alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedure that is used by businesses to resolve legal issues without incurring the expense and delay associated with court litigation. It does not result in a formal adjudication but is a vehicle for the parties to arrive at a solution through a structured settlement process. It is used most effectively when complex issues are at stake and the parties need or wish to maintain an amicable relationship. The term ’mini - trial’ is a misnomer, as it is not a trial, mini or otherwise. Rather, it is a voluntary, private, informal, confidential and non-binding settlement technique used most frequently in international disputes between corporations from different countries and cultures. It allows the disputants to focus on the merits of the dispute instead of dealing with procedural issues which differ from one legal system to another. Mini- trial is most helpful in case involving complex factual disputes which are always more amenable to consensual resolution processes, although mixed questions of fact and law may be also be appropriate for mini-trial if there is no need for a definitive judgment on the law.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Schewe, Christoph. "The Controversy over the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) and Its Investor-State Dispute Settlement = Pretrunas investoru un valsts strīdu izšķiršanā Transatlantiskās tirdzniecības un investīciju partnerības (TTIP) līgumā." In Latvijas Universitātes 74. zinātniskā konference. LU Akadēmiskais apgāds, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/juzk.74.01.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Zhang, Zhengyi, and Qiwei Wu. "International Energy Investment Disputes Settlement Involving Asian States." In 2021 International Conference on Public Relations and Social Sciences (ICPRSS 2021). Atlantis Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.215.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Koval, Alexandra G., Sergey F. Sutyrin, and Olga Y. Trofimenko. "Latin American experience in the WTO dispute settlement: recommendations for Russia and the EAEU states." In Proceedings of the Third International Economic Symposium (IES 2018). Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ies-18.2019.51.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Kačer, Hrvoje, Blanka Kačer, and Fani Milan Ostojić. "QUO VADIS CHF CASE – STANjE U REPUBLICI HRVATSKOJ 2022. GOD. … ILI KADA ĆE BANKE (I JOŠ NEKI) KONAČNO SHVATITI." In XVIII Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/xviiimajsko.169k.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Proceedings are pending before various domestic and international courts and the International Court of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in Washington, with both uncertain timing and content of the decision. Although it is true that relatively long time ago it was ruled on the nullity of banks' power to unilaterally change the interest rate and in this sense the partial nullity of credit agreements, as well as the nullity of the currency clause in CHF, new controversies have emerged over time (from the deadlines for suing onwards). The collective dispute (and the decisions in it) is not the only one in which what is known as the CHF case is decided, there are many individual cases, but also the mentioned arbitration before ICSID. Banks have (apparently irreversibly) lost their privileged position, but this has not led (at least not in large numbers) to out-of-court settlements, even when it is completely certain what the court decision will be. Banks can obviously suffer court costs, but they clearly favor postponing any payment, believing that it suits them better than the parties. However, banks are not the only ones who do not seem to have learned much. Even less has the state learned in the broadest sense of the word, a state that then, when it was most needed, when the whole problem arose, did absolutely nothing. Accepting the firefighter's vocabulary "did not put out a small fire until it became huge, catastrophic in every way." Later, the state became active, but with achievements that are more than modest so far and with uncertainty about what will happen with the arbitration in Washington.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "State dispute Settlement"

1

Moore, Ryan. The Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) Debate: Do Savings Provisions Influence Arbitration Outcomes? Portland State University Library, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.7447.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Mitra, Sudeshna, Amlanjyoti Goswami, Deepika Jha, Sahil Sasidharan, Kaye Lushington, and Tsomo Wangchuk. Land Records Modernisation in India: Himachal Pradesh. Indian Institute for Human Settlements, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24943/9788195648504.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This work provides an institutional, legal and policy review of crucial aspects of land records modernisation systems in Himachal Pradesh. A state characterised by hilly terrain, high forest cover and low urbanisation, Himachal Pradesh provides useful lessons to understand the robustness and diversity of land record administration systems. The property regimes that have historically developed in the state include customary rights, common property resources, jointly held rights, and multiple other use and possession arrangements. There is a restriction on who can transact properties in the state, aimed at preventing alienation of land. Settlement operations are conducted every 40 years, and often take a long time to complete, but have led to relatively more up-to-date records than some other states. There are also concerns regarding the accuracy of spatial records, and data mismatches between textual and spatial components of the existing record versus the new technology led survey data if often is a cause of disputes.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії