Готові списки джерел за темами / Split object / Книги

Книги з теми "Split object"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Split object.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 10 грудня 2022

Оновлено: 28 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-16 книг для дослідження на тему "Split object".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

Manfield, Philip. Split self/split object: Understanding and treating borderline, narcissistic, and schizoid disorders. Northvale, N.J: Aronson, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Splitu, Arheološki muzej u. Split u Arheološkome muzeju u Splitu. Split: Arheološki muzej u Splitu, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Splitu, Arheološki muzej u. Split u Arheološkome muzeju u Splitu. Split: Arheološki muzej u Splitu, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Carriker, Kitti. Created in our image: The miniature body of the doll as subject and object. Bethlehem: Lehigh University Press, 1998.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Zrinka, Buljević, Ivčević Sanja, Buljević Zvonimir 1933-, and Seser Tonći, eds. Odraz rimljanke. Split: Arheološki muzej u Splitu, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Carriker, Kitti. Created in Our Image: The Miniature Body of the Doll As Subject and Object. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Nash, Léa. The Structural Source of Split Ergativity and Ergative Case in Georgian. Edited by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Demena Travis. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.8.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

On the basis of the study of split ergativity in Georgian, this chapter defends a simple principle according to which the difference between a nominative and an ergative behaviour of the same language, and possibly across languages, consists in the capacity of the transitive subject to be theta-licensed, and by consequence case-licensed, in a position outside vP only in the nominative type. An outcome of this difference is that the transitive subject in ergative languages is licensed in vP, which is also the minimal domain containing the direct object. As both arguments of the transitive verb stay in vP, they are case-licensed by the same c-commanding functional head, according to the mechanism of Dependent Case (DC) assignment as originally proposed by Marantz (1991). The reason why one functional head marks two arguments in a language is due to the functional impoverishment between T and vP.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Schechter, Elizabeth. Bodies and Being One. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198809654.003.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter concerns the relationship between the split-brain case and the non-split case. In the first half of the chapter, I consider arguments to the effect that if split-brain subjects have two minds apiece, then so do non-split subjects. Sometimes these arguments have taken the form of a reductio against the 2-thinkers claim for split-brain subjects. These arguments do not work: that a split-brain subject has two minds does not mean that I have two minds, although it does mean that I could. The second half of the chapter offers my own proposal for the respect in which R’s and L’s co-embodiment as one animal, S, makes a split-brain subject one of us: I argue that S must be the single object of both R’s and L’s implicit bodily self-awareness.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Mahajan, Anoop. Accusative and Ergative in Hindi. Edited by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Demena Travis. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.4.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter examines the nature of case licensing of the direct object in ergative constructions in Hindi, a split ergative language. Split ergativity in Hindi is conditioned by aspect – perfective transitive constructions display ergative case marking while non-perfective clauses do not. The chapter argues that in Hindi the morphologically bare direct object in an ergative construction is case licensed by T(ense) and not by little v as argued recently by Legate (2008) and others. The evidence for this proposal comes from examining the syntax of perfective and imperfective prenominal relative clauses, an empirical domain in Hindi that has not been previously examined from the perspective of case licensing. The restrictions found on what arguments can be relativized in prenominal relative clauses provide crucial evidence for the nature of case licensing in Hindi participial clauses and that evidence in turn bears upon the nature of object case licensing in ergative constructions.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Malchukov, Andrej L. Ergativity and Differential Case Marking. Edited by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Demena Travis. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.11.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The present chapter discusses patterns of differential case marking in ergative languages, focusing on differential subject marking, which is more prominent in ergative languages (in contrast to accusative languages, where differential object marking is more prominent). It is argued that patterns of (differential) case marking can be accounted two general constraints related to (role)-indexing, on the one hand, and distinguishability (or markedness) on the other hand. This approach correctly predicts asymmetries between differential object marking (DOM) and differential subject marking (DSM) with regard to animacy, definiteness, as well as discourse features. I also show how this approach can be extended to capture a relation between case and voice alternation, as well as briefly outline diachronic scenarios leading to different types of differential case marking in ergative and split intransitive languages.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Khan, Geoffrey. Ergativity in Neo-Aramaic. Edited by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Demena Travis. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.36.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Ergativity is found in dialects of Neo-Aramaic that are spoken in regions where there has been extensive contact with Iranian languages, especially Kurdish, over many generations. All such Neo-Aramaic dialects are split ergative, with ergativity found only in verbs with the perfective stem or resultative participles, and the marking of ergativity is by cross-referencing on the verb. The constructions include a type that conforms to split-S morphological ergativity and an assortment of hybrid variations in which there are differing degrees of levelling with the nominative—accusative morphosyntax of imperfective stem verbal forms. These hybrid systems exhibit the alignment of argument cross-referencing but not the morphological markedness of cases characteristic of nominative—accusative systems, morphological markedness of cases based on transitive properties of dynamicity and punctuality rather than argument structure and various degrees of reduction of the distribution of the unmarked absolutive marking of the object in transitive clauses.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Bárány, András. Agreement and global case splits: agreement determining case. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804185.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter moves on to other languages and discusses global case splits. Such splits are alternations in case-marking which depend on properties of more than one argument, i.e. they are not local, but global. The analysis introduced in Chapter 3 is extended to cover such splits as well, showing that the same configurations of person determine the distribution of object agreement in Hungarian, subject case in Sahaptin, and object case in Kashmiri. It is also shown how the analysis can account for splits that are based on animacy using the same machinery, and splits that go beyond the inverse/direct distinction. The data in this chapter also illustrate that person and agreement can determine the choice of Case on the verb’s arguments in a number of languages in systematic ways.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Johns, Alana, and Ivona Kucerova. On the Morphosyntactic Reflexes of Information Structure in the Ergative Patterning of Inuit Language. Edited by Jessica Coon, Diane Massam, and Lisa Demena Travis. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198739371.013.17.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter argues – closely following the insights of Berge (2011) – that the ergative clause structure of the Inuit language is conditioned by information structure properties, more precisely by its topic comment properties. It articulates a formal model where the morphosyntactic properties result from this information structure trigger. Furthermore it shows that not only does the model correctly account for the split case and agreement properties of the Inuit language, but also other relevant properties discussed in the literature, i.e., scope properties of objects and aspect. It is also argued that objects in this language are introduced through an applicative head (Basilico 2012), after which they either topicalize or get assigned oblique case.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Bárány, András. Person, Case, and Agreement. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198804185.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This monograph discusses the interaction of person features, case-marking, and agreement across languages, and models the variation using parameters and parameter hierarchies. In both inverse agreement and global case splits, the subject and the object determine the form of the verb or case-marking on its arguments together. After proposing a detailed, novel analysis of differential object marking in Hungarian, it is shown that similar agreement alternations and case splits in other languages can be analysed in a uniform way since they both rely on person. Languages differ in the way they grammaticalize person, however, explaining why in some languages definiteness determines agreement and case-marking, while in others animacy does. In this book, both types are analysed as interactions of hierarchically organized person features and the verb. The approach to person features adopted here captures effects of so-called person or animacy hierarchies in syntax by treating different persons as sets of features with different cardinalities, ordered by subset/superset relations. The author relates this analysis to the interaction of Case and agreement, implements existing generalizations about the alignment of case and agreement and discusses a new one: the analysis predicts exactly the attested types of case and agreement alignment in ditransitive constructions, and rules out an unattested one. The book presents data from eight different language families.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Roelofs, Luke. Combining Minds. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190859053.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This book explores a neglected philosophical question: How do groups of interacting minds relate to singular minds? Could several of us, by organizing ourselves the right way, constitute a single conscious mind that contains our minds as parts? And could each of us have been, all along, a group of mental parts in close cooperation? Scientific progress seems to be slowly revealing that all the different physical objects around us are, at root, just a matter of the right parts put together in the right ways: How far could the same be true of minds? This book argues that we are too used to seeing the mind as an indivisible unity and that understanding our place in nature requires being willing to see minds as composite systems, simultaneously one conscious whole and many conscious parts. In thinking through the implications of such a shift of perspective, the book relates the question of mental combination to a range of different theories of the mind (in particular panpsychism, functionalism, and Neo-Lockeanism about personal identity) and identifies, clarifies, and addresses a wide array of philosophical objections (concerning personal identity, the unity of consciousness, the privacy of experience, and other issues) that have been raised against the idea of composite minds. The result is an account of the metaphysics of composition and consciousness that can illuminate many different debates in philosophy of mind, concerning split brains, collective intentionality, and the combination problem, among others.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

von Greyerz, Kaspar. European Physico-theology (1650-c.1760) in Context. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192864369.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Physico-theology harnessed the observation of nature to the recognition of God as Creator and to a demonstration of the compatibility of the biblical record with the new science. The new science emerged from the mid-seventeenth century. The present book offers the first study in English of physico-theology on a European scale. Its main argument is that physico-theology not only grew into an intellectual movement across Protestant Europe from the late seventeenth century onward, but that it was substantially different from the mainstream of traditional natural theology. The most prominent protagonists of the movement were virtuosi, especially clergy and physicians. European Physico-theology … in Context investigates in particular two physico-theological genres: the argument from design and diluvialism (i.e. the connection established between the biblical Flood and the existence of fossils). It also looks at practice in the exchange of natural objects, the establishment of collections, and the scientific efforts in taxonomy which they called for. Religion is not seen as an obstacle to the spread of science but as a factor in enhancing the interest of literate and educated people in acquiring natural knowledge. This can be maintained even though physico-theology was above all a Protestant concern owing to the kind of biblicism that the Protestant scientists and virtuosi brought to bear on their study of nature. After the mid-eighteenth century the movement split up into different currents, but in the Netherlands and Britain its mainstream continued to demonstrate a remarkable vitality, surviving well into the nineteenth century.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!