Дисертації з теми "Soins psychiatriques sans consentement"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-16 дисертацій для дослідження на тему "Soins psychiatriques sans consentement".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте дисертації для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
Bérard, Karine. "Les soins psychiatriques sans consentement en droit contemporain." Thesis, Lyon, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017LYSE3043/document.
Повний текст джерелаThe legal regime of the psychiatric care without consent, and the relevant legal provisions that surround it, are the direct consequence of the long-term development of the society in managing the mentally disabled people. This process of maturing, which reflects the delicate balance between the respect for fundamental freedoms and the imperatives of public order, mainly explains the rather belated recognition of these vulnerable patients as real subjects of rights. Through the law n°2011-803 of 5 July 2011 and the law n°2013-869 of 27 September 2013, the legislator maintained the model of care and medical administrative system without consent, dating from the nineteenth century. Nevertheless, through these last two reforms, the system has been attenuated by the introduction of a mandatory control of the liberty and custody judge and expanded these medical cares at the ambulatory. This system is characterised by its own duality in terms of admission rules: the request for care on demand of the representative of State (S.D.R.E.) on the one hand, and of a third party (S.D.T.) on the other hand. These two sets of procedures themselves are subdivided in a plurality of actions, each one justified on various purposes: urgency, absence of a third party, factual circumstances, existence of a serious public disorder or threat to the safety of individuals… Even if the legal regime for the medical care without consent is supposed to provide an appropriate care for each and every specific situations, often these policies are actually set for opportunistic reasons and do not always match reality. The disputes resulting from this exception legal regime demonstrate the many human rights violations suffered by the concerned patients. For these reasons, some tidying up can be envisaged. The latter would involve the merging of the two sets of procedures, the issuance of measures by the judge himself and a strengthening of the protection of civil rights and freedoms, provisions which will have to be surrounded by more effective safeguards and stronger controls
Mariller, Elodie. "Les droits du patient en prison et en soins psychiatriques sans consentement." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Bordeaux, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024BORD0333.
Повний текст джерелаPatients detained and in psychiatric care without consent are fully-fledged patients of our health system. As such, they should enjoy the right to protection of human dignity, the right to health protection and more generally all the rights recognized by the Public Health Code in articles L. 1110-1 et seq. However, the prison and psychiatric institution are unique places. The influence of the security imperative in these institutions cannot be ignored. The legislator must constantly ensure that the prerogatives of this patients are preserved, taking into account the expectations of society and the imperatives of public order. While efforts are made, they are not always sufficient to maintain this delicate balance. In addition to the influence of the concept of lower eligibility, this latter is weakened by the crisis that the health sector has been experiencing for several years and which undermines good professional practices. This deleterious situation affects the quality of care.To try to protect this patients from these attacks, effective safeguards must be provided. In these situations, it is legitimate to want to leave it to the domestic and European judges. However, their seizure is subject to formal procedures which can easily discourage applicants. In response to this, alternatives have been introduced. They may be manifested by the intervention of independent administrative authorities such as the Inspector-General of Locations of Deprivation of Liberty or, in a more original way, by private actors
Hazif-Thomas, Cyril. "La liberté de choix des personnes faisant l'objet de soins psychiatriques." Thesis, Rennes 1, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016REN1G013/document.
Повний текст джерелаWe cannot separate a relationship’s care based on trust from the raising of patient’s ability to freely express his decisions, the core capability of health relationships. If the goals in access of care and patient’s rights protection are clearly laid down, the issue about the freedom of choice of the mentally ill person is still subject to caution. The French legislative texts do not specify a clear boundary about the inability to consent to the care and it is up to the doctor to approve of its validity. The consent, valued by modern sanitary democracy, is disputed by the need for mental security but is consolidated by the search for a therapeutic alliance. The permanence of a conflicting situation explains the confrontation between a defense of the human Rights, hic and nunc, and a free choice assertion by the society
Sferlazzo-Boubli, Karine. "Le droit et les soins psychiatriques non consentis." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018AIXM0390.
Повний текст джерелаMental disease is a public health challenge that questions about the fundamental rights and freedoms of people with it. Mental disease can disrupt the discernment of patients. It sometimes requires the application of specific legislation whose purpose is to protect, through care and confinement, the person himself and others. People with mental disorders are not only sick, but also subjects of the law. They must have the same rights and fundamental freedoms as any other person and, above all, they require the same guarantees when, out of necessity, they are restricted. Their freedom to come and go, their private life and their dignity are particularly exposed. The question is whether, in the light of human rights reflections, their infringement is always justified and whether the guarantees offered for their protection are effective with regard to the people with mental disease. The concepts of consent and dignity need to be revised so that they can extend to this category of patients and can effectively protect them. While progress has been made to guarantee fundamental rights and freedoms, much remains to be done for people suffering of mental disease and deprived of their liberty because of the care they require
Boulard, Christian. "Analyse multidisciplinaire de la situation d'acheminement à l'hôpital psychiatrique en hospitalisation d'office." Nice, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999NICE2007.
Повний текст джерелаBernheim, Emmanuelle. "Les décisions d’hospitalisation et de soins psychiatriques sans le consentement des patients dans des contextes clinique et judiciaire : une étude du pluralisme normatif appliqué." Thesis, Cachan, Ecole normale supérieure, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011DENS0009/document.
Повний текст джерелаHow do those working in the intersection between law and psychiatry make decisions to confine or treat patients against their will? Do they simply apply the legal provisions that are supposed to regulate such actions, or do they refer to other forms of normativity? More globally, how do such stakeholders adopt norms and how is the choice of norms related to individuals’ roles in the social fabric? These are, very briefly, the issues explored in this thesis.This thesis has two distinct, but complementary, objectives. The first is theoretical, and concerns the sociological understanding of the phenomenon of normative pluralism as it operates in the social fabric and more specifically of individuals’ roles in normative dynamics. The second objective is to place normative pluralism and human rights into perspective in the special context of psychiatry. For this, we have chosen to study legal, clinical and social approaches to confining patients and to psychiatric care. This brings to light various latent normative tensions, which proves useful when drawing up theories about normative relations
Bernheim, Emmanuelle. "Les décisions d'hospitalisation et de soins psychiatriques sans le consentement des patients dans des contextes clinique et judiciaire : une étude du pluralisme normatif appliqué." Thèse, École normale supérieure de Cachan - ENS Cachan, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/5198.
Повний текст джерелаHow do those working in the intersection between law and psychiatry make decisions to confine or treat patients against their will? Do they simply apply the legal provisions that are supposed to regulate such actions, or do they refer to other forms of normativity? More globally, how do such stakeholders adopt norms and how is the choice of norms related to individuals’ roles in the social fabric? These are, very briefly, the issues explored in this thesis. This thesis has two distinct, but complementary, objectives. The first is theoretical, and concerns the sociological understanding of the phenomenon of normative pluralism as it operates in the social fabric and more specifically of individuals’ roles in normative dynamics. The second objective is to place normative pluralism and human rights into perspective in the special context of psychiatry. For this, we have chosen to study legal, clinical and social approaches to confining patients and to psychiatric care. This brings to light various latent normative tensions, which proves useful when drawing up theories about normative relations. We begin by doing an epistemological analysis of the legal and sociological paradigms of social regulation and internormativity. In this section, we explore different conceptions of law and normativity and, by extension, the shaping of human and social relations. Our first conclusion from this analysis is that the different forms of normativity interweave in complex, changing ways and that no clear hierarchy always emerges. Our second conclusion is that individuals influence the application of norms, whether they are legal or not. The plurality of norms and of the meanings that they convey naturally confronts individuals with choices among different standards. In order to gain a better understanding of individuals’ real roles in normative dynamics, since individuals have a certain degree of freedom, we have taken a subjectivist, constructivist point of view. From this perspective, interpretations of norms and the meanings they convey are related to individuals’ conceptions of the meaning of their actions and roles in interpersonal and social relations. It is from this perspective that we propose the applied normative pluralism model, which is inspired largely by the sociological approaches we have studied and more specifically by the concept of “living law.” Using this model, we conceptualize normative pluralism as a set of norms flowing from various sources that may be in substantial contradiction and have different weights. Indeed, describing psychiatric discourse as a behavioural norm of normality is a perfect example of the cleavage between different perspectives on social ties, especially with respect to psychiatric patients. In the proposed model, each norm is twinned with cognitive or axiological rationality, depending on the nature of the relationship to the Other. Our hypothesis is that the actor’s degree of freedom correlates with the rigidity of the legal framework: the more specific the law is, the less the individual will have recourse to other forms of normativity. In order to verify our hypothesis, we have used two distinct situations that are regulated by law in different ways but that have similar ethical and legal stakes: non-consensual hospitalization and psychiatric care, in other words, confinement to an institution and court authorization of care (Québec Civil Code, articles 30 and 16). Our empirical research on judges and psychiatrists has been designed to map the complex relationships between those studied (the meanings they give to their actions, their conceptions of their roles in the social fabric) and norms. The findings show that two types of norms are in fact complementary: normative and factual propositions. The former are associated with the role that the individual thinks he or she has, while the latter are used in practical implementation of that role. Similarly, the weight of a discourse on normality demonstrates the survival of a paternalist moral perspective with its roots in psychiatry. This is difficult to reconcile with an approach based on human rights. Finally, we conclude that the choice between different types of norms is influenced by the conception that each individual has of the society in which he or she lives, and more specifically of his or her role in that society. Our empirical research raises questions about what is underlying the real nature of legal and psychiatric intervention with respect to confining patients to institutions and authorizing care, and about the pragmatic and ontological foundations of law in these areas.
Thèse de doctorat réalisée en cotutelle avec l'Institut du social et du politique de l'École Normale supérieure de Cachan.
Reich, Cyril. "L'internement psychiatrique en application de la loi du 30 juin 1838 : l'exemple de l'asile départemental de Marévillle, Meurthe-et-Moselle, 1838-1900 : internement psychiatrique, soins et statut des malades mentaux." Nancy 2, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004NAN20008.
Повний текст джерелаBerthon, Georges. "Hospitalisation sur demande d'un tiers ? : Comment envisager la contrainte en psychiatrie et respecter la règle du consentement." Paris 11, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010PA11T015.
Повний текст джерелаChaubet, Stéphanie. "La déclaration d'irresponsabilité pénale pour trouble mental au stade de l'instruction." Thesis, Montpellier 1, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012MON10045/document.
Повний текст джерелаLike many other laws passed in criminal matters, law n° 2008-174, dated 25 february 2000, relating to security detention and criminal irresponsibility due to mental disorders, was adopted in response to the deep emotion of the public opinion generated by the media coverage of tragic events.This law has two main components : the first focuses on "security detention" for criminals with severe personality disorders, cause of a "particularly dangerous nature" ; the second part entitled "declaration of irresponsibility due to mental disorders" interested persons found not criminally responsible in application of article 122-1 § 1 of the Penal Code. While the second part of the 2008 law had a lesser media coverage than the first one, he raised and still raises heated debates. Composed of several dispositions inspired by various works related to the question of criminal responsibility due to mental disorders, that led to the formulation of sometimes surprising recommendations, the second part of the 2008 law was strongly criticized. Some of these dispositions, however, were unanimously approved. After five years of application, what conclusions should be drawn ? During the investigation phase, the results are somewhat mixed. It seems that some of the changes that were made on the occasion of the 2008 law have an uncontestable utility, but, others, however, are insufficient or unnecessary
Masson, Marc. "Soins et assistance prodigués aux aliénés par les Frères de Saint-Jean-de-Dieu dans la France du XVIIIe siècle : pour une contribution à la réflexion sur la place de l'humanisme dans la pratique psychiatrique." Bordeaux 2, 1999. http://www.theses.fr/1999BOR23005.
Повний текст джерелаCorbeil, Céline. "Le consentement aux soins psychiatriques." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1997. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/MQ26559.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаCorbeil, Céline. "Le consentement aux soins psychiatriques." Sherbrooke : Université de Sherbrooke, 1997.
Знайти повний текст джерелаChevalier, Sébastien. "Refus d'un acte médical et liberté individuelle." Thesis, Angers, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015ANGE0088.
Повний текст джерелаThe right to refuse a medical act, a corollary of the principle of consent to care, reflects the expression of individual freedoms and respect for the physical integrity of individuals. However, the affirmation of this right does not appear to be self-evident: it amounts to admitting the deterioration of a person’s health whereas the purpose of medicine is to achieve the healing of a patient. Moreover, like all fundamental rights and freedoms, nuisance to others is a limit to the application of the right to refuse a medical act. If temperaments are provided for, the limitations of the said right are susceptible of degrees: failure to comply with the legislative provisions relating to compulsory vaccinations results in the prohibition of access to the public school service and exposes the offender to criminal sanctions. In this case, the physical integrity of individuals is not affected since there is no possibility of forced injection. On the other hand, the principle of consent to care is called into question in two cases. On the one hand, when the patient’s vital prognosis is at stake, interventions can be given by force; this applies to blood transfusions intended for a Jehovah’s Witness patient. On the other hand, the right to refuse a medical procedure can disappear when people suffering from mental disorders are hospitalized without consent. However, strengthened safeguards have recently been put in place: new procedural rules that are more protective of fundamental freedoms are being applied and the judicial wall is more efficient. Consequently, restrictions on the exercise of the right to refuse a medical act are justified in the name of safeguarding public order, the definition of which is extensive
Boumaza, Assia. "Hospitalisation psychiatrique et droits de l'homme /." Paris : Éd. du CTNERHI : diff. PUF, 2002. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb389244920.
Повний текст джерелаCauchon, Marc. "À l’écoute du soignant : relation de soins et considérations éthiques dans la pratique des soins psychiatriques communautaires." Thèse, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/8371.
Повний текст джерелаResistance to or non-compliance with medical interventions on the part of people presenting with severe and persistent manifestations of a psychiatric disorder, such as schizophrenia, will be the context in which to develop a formal distinction between the concepts of treatment and care, and subsequently between the consent to treatment and consent to care as separate forms of consent. The practice of first line community psychiatry will serve as a starting point to raise interesting challenges from an ethical standpoint. This thesis will explore the ethical implications of consent within a therapeutic relationship. Discussion around a specific model of crisis intervention characterized by a multidisciplinary approach will lead to the categorization of ethical problems and the formalization of a problem-solving model. A three-fold approach to ethical problems will be presented in terms of issues, dilemmas and ethical challenges. Crisis intervention will be categorized into four increasing levels of intensity based on the subjective assessment of a person in crisis and their capacity to establish and maintain a therapeutic rapport with a caregiver, throughout and beyond the crisis. Parallels between psychiatric and palliative care will be established in order to question the concepts of suffering and pain and to stress the importance of setting distinctions, once again, between care and treatment. The rapport that can develop between a caregiver and a person cared for will be presented as an opportunity to normalize a specific therapeutic rapport and value a perceived state of suffering calling for change, a condition that requires not treatment, but rather caring. These considerations will lead to the identification of a new goal for the caregiver, that is, to preserve the therapeutic rapport. A transition from the primum non nocere to a primum non excludere, i.e., “first, do not exclude “will serve as a motto to provide guidance towards a more authentic consent to care.