Статті в журналах: "Sociology and philosophy of sciences"

1

Voříšek, Michael. "In whose service? The 1960s’ Czechoslovak Sociologists and their Party." Comparative Sociology 10, no. 5 (2011): 781–806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156913311x599070.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract This article examines the relationship between sociologists and the Communist Party headquarters in 1960 Czechoslovakia. It is based on the archives of the coordinating body of Czechoslovak sociology, the Scientific Board of Philosophy and Sociology at the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. First, the article depicts the synergy between sociology and the powers: the research commissioned by the supreme Party bodies or the Party sponsorship of sociology’s institutionalization. However, instances of lacking material support to the discipline are noted as well. Second, the conflicts between social scientists and the Party headquarters are discussed: namely, the layoff of the philosopher Ivan Sviták in 1964 and the following interventions into the Institute of Philosophy. Finally, the article maps the demands for autonomy as formulated by the scholars in 1968. In concluding, it points to the fact that despite requesting independence from the Communist headquarters, the Marxist elite in the social sciences never abandoned their own claim to hegemony. They resisted both the challenge of non-Marxist scholars in 1968, and the spontaneous claims and complaints that might come from the society at large. In that respect, the sociology of the 1960s seems a perfect child of the Czechoslovak reformist movement.

2

Ortiz de Landázuri, Carlos. ""Positivismusstreit", 30 años después. A través del giro semiótico de Apel." Anuario Filosófico 27, no. 3 (October 4, 2018): 1041–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.15581/009.27.29843.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The controversy on Positivism is very important because of its influence on Humans Sciences and Comprehensive Sociology. Kart-Otto Apel is the central philosopher in this controversy that moves a transformation of contemporary philosophy.

3

Kravchenko, S. A., and A. V. Shestopal. "Philosophy and Sociology Studies." MGIMO Review of International Relations, no. 5(38) (October 28, 2014): 151–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2071-8160-2014-5-38-151-158.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Philosophy and Social science school of MGIMO has received both nationwide and international recognition. The traditions of the school were laid by two highly respected scientists and science managers, George P. Frantsev, who was the rector MGIMO during the crucial period of its early years, and Alexander F. Shishkin, who was the founder and head of the Department of Philosophy. The former belonged to one of the best schools of antic history studies of the Petersburg (Leningrad) University. Frantsev made a great contribution to the restoration of Russian social and political science after World War II. After graduating from MGIMO, he worked at the Foreign Ministry of USSR, and then served as a rector of the Academy of Social Sciences and chief-editor of the journal "Problems of Peace and Socialism" in Prague. He consistently supported MGIMO scientists and recommended them as participants for international congresses and conferences. Shishkin was born in Vologda, and studied in Petrograd during 1920s. His research interests included history of education and morality. He was the author of the first textbook on ethics in the postwar USSR. Other works Shishkin, including monograph "XX century and the moral values of humanity", played a in reorienting national philosophy from class interests to universal moral principles. During thirty years of his leadership of the Department of Philosophy, Shishkin managed to prepare several generations of researchers and university professors. Scientists educated by Shishkin students consider themselves to be his "scientific grandchildren". The majority of MGIMO post-graduate students followed the footsteps of Frantsev in their research, but they also were guided by Shishkin's ideas on morality in human relations. Philosophy and Social science school of MGIMO played an important role in the revival of Soviet social and political science. Soviet Social Science Association (SSSA), established in 1958, elected Frantsev as its president, and G.V. Osipov as a deputy president. A year later Osipov became president and remained so until 1972.

4

Landini, Tatiana Savoia. "NORBERT ELIAS AND FIGURATIONAL SOCIOLOGY: INTERVIEW WITH STEPHEN MENNELL." Sociologia & Antropologia 12, no. 1 (April 2022): 13–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752022v1211.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract This is an interview with Stephen Mennell and a set of texts related to Norbert Elias’s figurational sociology that make up the current volume of Sociologia & Antropologia. Mennell provides readers with a review of figurational sociology, as well as its reception and diffusion. More specifically, he reflects upon Elias’s legacies for sociology and his movement away from philosophy; the publication of the collected works of Norbert Elias; authors who influenced Elias; the importance of the sociology of knowledge and the sciences in the body of Elias’s work; the understanding of the concepts of civilising and decivilising processes, and functional democratisation and de-democratisation; resemblances and differentiations between Elias and Bourdieu; concluding with some reflections on the book The American Civilizing Process, published by Mennell in 2007, and on the use of figurational sociology for the study of current political issues.

5

Vandenberghe, Frédéric. "Sociology as Practical Philosophy and Moral Science." Theory, Culture & Society 35, no. 3 (May 26, 2017): 77–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276417709343.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The philosophical assumptions that organize moral sociology as practical philosophy are the outcome of a secular quest to investigate the principles, norms and values behind the constitution of society. As a protracted response to the whole utilitarian-atomistic-individualistic tradition that systematically deemphasizes the constitutive role that morality plays in the structuration of self and society, the sociological tradition has continued, by its own means, the tradition of moral and practical philosophy in theoretically informed empirical research of social practices. Going back to classic moral philosophy, I want to show in this article how social theory is involved in the quest for ‘the good life with and for the others in just institutions’ (Ricoeur).

6

Apata, Gabriel O. "Adorno on Philosophy and Sociology." Theory, Culture & Society 39, no. 7-8 (December 2022): 331–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632764221141088.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Philosophy and sociology appear to belong to separate spheres of thought, which might explain why they exist as separate academic disciplines. But in what way, if any, are philosophy and sociology different from, or related to, each other? In these series of lectures delivered at Frankfurt University in 1960, Adorno examines the relationship between philosophy and sociology and concludes that the subjects do not belong to separate spheres of thought. But Adorno has a bigger aim in mind. His attempt to reconcile philosophy and sociology takes the form of a wholesale attack on positivistic sociology, followed by a critique of philosophical idealism. There is, however, a debate as to whether the origins of Adorno’s critical sociology lie in Marx’s critique of political economy or philosophical idealism. These lectures throw further light on this question as they show the development of Adorno’s social philosophy and the critical theory.

7

Vlasova, Olga. "Methodologies of Memory Studies and Sociology of Philosophy in the Study of the History of Philosophy and Science." Sociological Journal 28, no. 1 (March 29, 2022): 24–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/socjour.2022.28.1.8836.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

While interest towards Memory Studies has long been popular when it comes to studying cultural traditions and social groups, the field of science (scientific traditions) describes issues using the traditional language of history, philosophy and sociology of science. This happens despite Memory Studies potentially being a productive asset in this problem field. This paper brings together Memory Studies and R. Collins’ sociology of philosophy, while presenting a new strategy for problematization based on the history of philosophy. Memory Studies and sociology of philosophies are presented as two complementary approaches that have interdisciplinary prospects for understanding the methodological problems of the humanities in general and philosophy in particular. The foundations of the approaches are analyzed, a comparative analysis is conducted of the conceptual apparatus, examples of explication of sociological tools in the field of current philosophical discussions are considered. How does philosophy work with the past, how does the “past-present” dialectic unfold in the community of philosophers, how do mnemonic practices determine the lines of power in this field? How are “sacred texts” selected in academic communities, what role do mnemonic practices play when it comes to generational bonds? What sort of practices circulate in the community in terms of condemning or accepting figures from the past? All of these issues are analyzed in the study, based on the concepts of Memory Studies and sociology of philosophy while invoking the ideas of R. Collins’ critics, as well as methodological historical and philosophical works. The approach offered by the author makes it possible to expand Memory Studies and sociology of philosophy into the field of history of philosophy and lay the foundations for such studies in the history, sociology and philosophy of science.

8

BAIGRIE, BRIAN S. "PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE AS NORMATIVE SOCIOLOGY." Metaphilosophy 19, no. 3-4 (July 1988): 237–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.1988.tb00771.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Levchenko, Valery, Gregory Z. Fainburg, and Gennady Razinsky. "Perm (fainburg) scientific school of sociology: history and development process." Semiotic studies 2, no. 2 (July 5, 2022): 89–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-2-89-97.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Perm School of Sociology appeared in the mid-60s of the twentieth century to a large extent thanks to the famous philosopher, sociologist, culturologist, political economist, doctor of philosophy and candidate of economic sciences, professor Zakhar Ilyich Fainburg (24.01.1922 10.09.1990). The distinctive feature of this scholar school has been the working combination of profound theoretical analysis of the modern social phenomena, fundamental reasons revealing of their occurrence and specific applied empirical researches, ending with specific recommendations that take into account the analyzed organizations and regions specific features. The present school to exists, functions and actively works for the benefit of the sociology of Russia.

10

Artemov, V. M. "Conversation with professor A.A. Guseynov." Actual Problems of Russian Law, no. 8 (September 20, 2019): 200–214. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2019.105.8.200-214.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The paper is a conversation between the scientific adviser of the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Abdusalam Abdulkerimovich Guseynov and the activists of the philosophical and legal club “Moral Dimension of Law” headed by its scientific adviser — Doctor of Philosophy, Professor Vyacheslav Mikhailovich Artemov (Department of Philosophy and Sociology of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)).

11

van Seters, Paul. "From Public Sociology to Public Philosophy: Lessons for Law and Society." Law & Social Inquiry 35, no. 04 (2010): 1137–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01219.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The late Philip Selznick's final book, A Humanist Science, examines the role of values and ideals in the social sciences, including the study of law and society. Throughout his academic career, Selznick was committed to what he called “legal naturalism,” a sociological version of the natural‐law perspective, while his critics continue to adhere to various forms of positivism. But the age‐old opposition between natural law and legal positivism today may be giving way to the quest for public sociology—a sociology that promotes public reflection on significant social issues and thus functions as a moral and political force. A Humanist Science ends with a strong plea for public philosophy. Public philosophy overlaps with public sociology but is a much stronger concept. Selznick's message of public philosophy may be another of his enduring contributions to the field of law and society.

12

Fuller, Steve. "Social Epistemology: A Philosophy for Sociology or a Sociology of Philosophy?" Sociology 34, no. 3 (August 2000): 573–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/s0038038500000353.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Trunov, F. O. "Philosophy and Sociology of Law by Bogdan Kistyakovski." Governance and Politics 3, no. 1 (April 23, 2024): 102–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2024-3-1-102-119.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article tries to explore the importance of the work «Philosophy and sociology of the law» by Bogdan Kistyakovsky for the political science and theory. The article shows the positioning of the intelligentsia in Kyiv as part of Russian Empire, its critical attitude to the ideas of Ukrainophilism. The author stresses the political proximity of Bogdan Kistyakovsky to the political party of constitutional democrats (cadets). In his work Kistyakovsky tried to show the advantages of the rule of law, the possibility of its establishment in the Russia of that time. The article considers the contribution of the «Philosophy and sociology of the law» to the evolution of generalized scientific knowledge, the methods he proposed for improving the humanities and social sciences.

14

Goudsblom, Johan. "Elias and Cassirer, Sociology and Philosophy." Theory, Culture & Society 12, no. 3 (August 1995): 121–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026327695012003005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Wesely, Anna. "Philosophy of science and sociology of knowledge." Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 10, no. 1 (March 1997): 7–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13511610.1997.9968509.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Consolim, Marcia. "Georges Dumas et Marcel Mauss." Durkheimian Studies 24, no. 1 (December 1, 2020): 144–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/ds.2020.24011.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

*Full article is in FrenchEnglish abstract: This article discusses the relationships between sociology and psychology through the dialogue between Georges Dumas and Marcel Mauss about the expression of emotions during the 1920s. Firstly, the aim is to show the affinities of their engagements concerning the disputes between human sciences and philosophy. Secondly, from an analysis of their trajectories, the aim is to show that the positions taken in the debates are associated with the positions psychologists and sociologists took inside the academic field from 1900 to 1930. Finally, the article aims to show that the dialogue between Mauss and Dumas reveals a process of sociologization of psychology rather than a psychologization of sociology, which has produced criticism from psychologists aiming to regain their lost position and from sociologists from the new generation aiming to overcome Durkheimian sociology.French abstract: Il s’agit de discuter les rapports entre la sociologie et la psychologie à travers le dialogue entre Georges Dumas et Marcel Mauss au long des années 1920 sur l’expression des émotions et des sentiments. Le but est d’abord de montrer les affinités entre leurs engagements concernant les combats des sciences de l’homme contre la philosophie. Ensuite, à partir d’une analyse de leurs trajectoires, d’argumenter que leurs prises de position dans ce débat sont associées aux positions que les psychologues et les sociologues ont occupées dans le champ académique entre les années 1900 et 1930. Finalement, il s’agira de montrer que le dialogue entre Mauss et Dumas révèle la sociologisation de la psychologie plutôt que la psychologisation de la sociologie, et que les critiques faites à ce dialogue par les psychologues visent à regagner de l’espace perdu, alors que celles des sociologues de la nouvelle génération visent plutôt à dépasser la sociologie durkheimienne qui inspire ce dialogue.

17

Trevino, A. Javier, and Mario Bunge. "The Sociology-Philosophy Connection." Contemporary Sociology 30, no. 5 (September 2001): 536. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3089374.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Bryant, C. G. A., and J. O. Wisdom. "Philosophy of the Social Sciences." British Journal of Sociology 41, no. 2 (June 1990): 295. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/590879.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Freyer, Hans. "Sociology as a Science of Reality: A Logical Foundation for the System of Sociology." Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie / Russian Sociological Review 20, no. 2 (2021): 290–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1728-192x-2021-2-290-299.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Centre for Fundamental Sociology (HSE University, Moscow) and Vladimir Dal Publishing House (St. Petersburg) have initiated the Russian translation and publication of Sociology as a Science of Reality: A Logical Foundation for the System of Sociology (1930), a key work of the famous German philosopher and sociologist, Hans Freyer. In the early 1920s, Freyer, who became the first full professor of sociology in Germany, published several seminal works covering a wide range of topics in social science and political philosophy. The Introduction to the thinker’s first work on sociology in its proper meaning, published here, has the characteristics of a program manifesto outlining the basic principles for comprehending the discipline and its subject matter as a social and historical phenomenon. Freyer argues that sociology as a scholarly discipline emerges in a society that is being detached from the state; now, instead of an obvious and stable order, an insecure, precarious and unpredictable society arises, becoming a problem for itself. Consequently, alongside the formation of sociology, its object emerges; it is a heterogeneous “society” that has gained autonomy from the state while sharply divergent from that same society regarding the principles of the organization of social life. Meanwhile, the distinctive feature of European sociology is not simply its embeddedness in history, but its immediate substantial connection with the preceding philosophical tradition. This enables Freyer to raise the question of the philosophical basis of sociology as a scientific system. He also formulates the task of defining the forms of this system and outlining its primary lines. The structural and methodological comparison between the European sociology version and the American version of the discipline is particularly interesting from the perspective of the academic history.

20

Shinkevich, Vladimir E. "SECURITY PROBLEMS AS A SUBJECT OF SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSION." Society and Security Insights 5, no. 4 (January 27, 2023): 207–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2022)4-13.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article is devoted to the results of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference "Sociology, philosophy, law in the system of ensuring national security, dedicated to the memory of Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor D.D. Nevirko". It presents a content analysis of the reports and introductions announced by the participants of the scientific forum, reflects the main content of the abstracts of reports and speeches, socially significant problems that are subject to research by modern humanitarian science, primarily philosophy, sociology, law.

21

Beliaev, E. I. "Methodological Complexity of the Science of Society (Metaphilosophical Analysis)." Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy 11, no. 2 (2011): 8–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2011-11-2-8-13.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In article are considered problems of demarcation and the relations between history and philosophy of sociology and of their influence upon self-realization of sociology and renewing of social philosophy.

22

Fitzgerald, Des. "What was sociology?" History of the Human Sciences 32, no. 1 (February 2019): 121–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0952695118808935.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article is about the future of sociology, as transformations in the digital and biological sciences lay claim to the discipline’s jurisdictional hold over ‘the social’. Rather than analyse the specifics of these transformations, however, the focus of the article is on how a narrative of methodological crisis is sustained in sociology, and on how such a narrative conjures very particular disciplinary futures. Through a close reading of key texts, the article makes two claims: (1) that a surprisingly conventional urge towards disciplinary reproduction often animates accounts of sociology’s crisis; (2) that, even more surprisingly, these same accounts are often haunted by a hidden metaphorical architecture centred on biology, vitality, vigour and life. The central gambit of the article is that, perhaps in spite of itself, this subterranean image of life actually hints at less reproductively conventional ways of understanding – and intervening in – sociology’s methodological ‘crisis’. Drawing, empirically, on the author’s recent work on urban stress and, theoretically, on Stefan Helmreich’s (2011, 2016) account of ‘limit biologies’, the articles ends with a call for a ‘limit sociology’ – a form of attention that could, similarly, expand rather than contract the present moment of transformation. At the heart of the article is a hope that thinking with such a limit may help sociologists to imagine a less deadening future than that on offer from a canonised discipline cathected by endless crisis-talk.

23

Kanke, Victor Andreevich, Natalya Ilinichna Kiseleva, Tatiana Nikolaevna Seregina, Elena Vitalievna Tarakanovskaya, and Ilya Vadimovich Opryshko. "The complementarity of sociology and psychology and their general scientific significance." LAPLAGE EM REVISTA 7, no. 1 (January 4, 2021): 390–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202171747p.390-395.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The nature of sociology and psychology is clarified accounting for the achievements of modern philosophy of science. The general scientific significance of these sciences is determined in accordance with said clarification. Any scientific theory functions, in particular, in the form of group and individual theories. In this connection, the general scientific significance of sociology and psychology becomes evident. The status of sociology is primarily determined by the study of group theories that have general scientific significance. The status of psychology is determined by individual theories. Its priority in this area is also indisputable. Therefore, same as sociology, psychology presents a science of auxiliary nature. Auxiliary sciences are necessary for the development of the content of the independent sciences. Unfortunately, the mainstream tendency is that both sociology and psychology are considered independent branches of science. In this regard, the status of sociology is determined by a certain class of social phenomena, and the status of psychology is determined by mental processes.

24

Cooke, Maeve. "Philosophy and the Social Sciences." Philosophy & Social Criticism 43, no. 3 (March 2017): 260–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0191453716671832.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Ilic, Vladimir. "Different conceptions of observation in sociology and anthropology." Sociologija 55, no. 4 (2013): 519–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/soc1304519i.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The paper contains introductory considerations regarding the observation such as particular method and research procedure in social sciences. The observation is greatly neglected in favor of so called qualitative research methods or field work today. The observation is the strongest research procedure due to it has the most direct approach to the examined phenomena. In this text the different traditions of the observation in social sciences (sociology, psychology, anthropology, pedagogy) are considered. Present neglecting of observation is explained by the impact of epistemological as well as social factors. Former ones are related to the growing division among the philosophy of science and the methodologies of particular sciences. Latter are conditioned by subversive potential of observation in comparison to more fashioned methods and procedures.

26

Osadchaya, Galina, Gevork Poghosyan, and Olga Volkova. "On the International Scientific Conference “Socio-Economic Potential of the Armenian Diaspora in the Context of Integration in the EAEU”." DEMIS. Demographic Research 2, no. 4 (December 28, 2022): 156–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.19181/demis.2022.2.4.12.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

On October 26–27, 2022, the international scientific conference “The Socio-Economic Potential of the Armenian Diaspora in the Context of Integration Processes in the EAEU” was held in a mixed format. The organizers of the scientific event were the Institute for Demographic Research – branch of the Federal Center for Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (IDR FCTAS RAS), the Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Armenia, the Scientific Council “Socio-Political Problems of the Formation of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)” of the Department for Social Sciences RAS.

27

Danilov, Alexander N. "Sociology at the Belarusian State University: Origins and Philosophy of Development." Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 64, no. 5 (November 1, 2021): 31–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2021-64-5-31-44.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article examines the origins and philosophy of the development of sociology at the Belarusian State University (BSU), which has accumulated the wisdom and socio-political thought of Belarusian thinkers of the past, absorbed the research experience of previous generations. Since the beginning of the work of BSU in 1921, the Department of Sociology and Primitive Culture was created (S.Z. Katzenbogen). The course in genetic sociology, which was taught by Professor S.Z. Katzenbogen, to a greater extent resembled a kind of fusion of philosophical and sociological thought and primitive history, was unlike modern ideas about sociological science. This period did not last long. Soon repressions broke out, the Great Patriotic War, and the post-war reconstruction took place, which significantly delayed the development of sociology as an independent science. All this time, sociology functioned in the bosom of philosophical knowledge, where the convergence of meanings and meaningful mutual enrichment took place, the difficult process of accumulating theoretical, methodological and practical experience was going on. The rticle highlights the key role of BSU in institutionalization, development of sociological science and education in Belarus. The leader of the revival of sociology at BSU was Professor G.P. Davidyuk (1923–2020). Following the example of the Belarusian State University, in the 1960s–1970s, sociological structures were created in all the leading universities of the republic; the work of the applied sociology sector of BSU contributed to the development of factory sociology. In 1989, a sociological department and a department of sociology were opened, at the end of 1996, the Center for Sociological and Political Research was established. Since 1997, the scientific and theoretical Journal of BSU. Sociology, and in 2000 the Belarusian Sociological Society began to function, a branch of the Department of Sociology of the Belarusian State University was opened at the Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. The traditions of previous generations, laid down by the leaders of the Belarusian sociological school, are gradually being transformed, taking into account the development of scientific, technological and informational and communicative progress, revising curricula and training programs for modern sociologists.

28

Lamy, Jérôme. "Sociology of a disciplinary bifurcation: Bruno Latour and his move from philosophy/theology to sociology in the early 1970s." Social Science Information 60, no. 1 (January 20, 2021): 107–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0539018420984053.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article analyzes Bruno Latour’s transition from theology to sociology between the late 1960s and the mid-1970s. The study cross-analyzes the philosophical field of the 1970s with the progress of interaction rituals specific to disciplinary integration. By examining his Master’s degree in philosophy and a lecture carried out during his thesis, plus the report of his stay in Ivory Coast, it is possible to identify several stages of a disciplinary bifurcation. First anchored to the metaphysical sector of the philosophical field, Latour – like his masters André Malet, Jean Brun and Claude Bruaire – tried to dissolve the boundary between philosophy and theology. Nourished with Rudolf Bultmann’s hermeneutics – which generates a particularly powerful emotional energy –, the young philosopher drew from the new theological resources provided by Vatican II Council the instruments for a conversion to sociology. Before that, following in the Council’s focus on prayer as the very core of the practice of believers, he had tried to turn prayer into an adequate mode of litany for analyzing texts. He then drew on the post-colonial opening of Vatican II to engage in the field of sociology, the Council having exhausted classical metaphysical questions. His discovery of the effects of colonial domination also played a fundamental role in mobilizing once again some emotional energy. Latour’s disciplinary reclassification just before beginning his laboratory ethnography in California is based on a reassessment of the epistemological possibilities born from the theological innovations of Vatican II.

29

Gare, Arran. "Aleksandr Bogdanov's history, sociology and philosophy of science." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31, no. 2 (June 2000): 231–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0039-3681(00)00002-9.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Pavlov, Alexander V. "The “September Group”: From Analytical Marxism to Normative Political Philosophy." Ethical Thought 21, no. 2 (2021): 129–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/2074-4870-2021-21-2-129-142.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Analytical Marxism – formerly also known as the “September group” – is a branch of Anglo-Saxon social theory, political and normative philosophy. There are several publications on the set in the Russian humanities and social sciences, but all articles are limited to the sociological aspect of the work of analytical Marxists. In this article we propose to consider another aspect of this direction – normative aspect. To show this aspect of analytical Marxists, the author suggests considering the movement in historical dynamics. It originates from the publication of “Karl Marx’s Theory of History” (1978) by Canadian-English philosopher J.A. Cohen. Cohen tried to rid Marxism of Hegelianism and make it the subject of a real science, which set the framework the current’s activity. At the first stage of the work, analytical Marxists (J.A. Cohen, Jon Elster, John Roemer, Erik Olin Wright, Robert Brenner, Adam Przeworski and others) worked within the framework of sociology and historical sociology, combining the problems raised by Marx with various scientific methods – game theory, rational choice theory, historical sociology, etc. By the early 1990’s, some of the participants of the movement left the group (Elster, Przeworski), while others refocused on new topics, namely, normative political philosophy. Arguing with the ideas and arguments of John Rawls, Robert Nozick, and others, analytical Marxists answered the problems of normative theory in their own way – an attempt to combine freedom and equality (Cohen), egalitarianism (Roemer), real utopias (Wright), and basic income (Philippe Van Parijs).

31

Myers, Greg. "Sociology of Science Without the Sociology." Social Studies of Science 20, no. 3 (August 1990): 559–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631290020003008.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Balon, Jan. "O samotné myšlence jednotné sociologie: Harvard a Columbia." Teorie vědy / Theory of Science 33, no. 3 (November 21, 2011): 358–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.46938/tv.2011.123.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

On the Very Idea of Unified Sociology: Harvard and ColumbiaAbstract: The article concentrates on the historical context of American sociology's development in the period between 1930 and 1965, which is here associated with a specific project of the field's unification elaborated at Harvard University and Columbia University. It is argued that the idea of unified sociology is worked in the very project of American sociology as a science and found its genuine expression in the efforts to reach "objectivity and coherence" of sociological thought/knowledge. It also distinctly formed the professional identity of the discipline. It was expected that the scientific integrity would be achieved by means of securing the continuity of theory and practice, which was to provide a general methodological pillar for cumulative research. The historical contextualization of this formative period studies how the very idea of unified sociology affected both theoretical and methodological perspectives within the discipline and also the possibility of its integrated research agenda.O samotné myšlence jednotné sociologie: Harvard a ColumbiaAbstrakt: Článek se zaměřuje na historický kontext vývoje americké sociologie v období mezi lety 1930-1965, jež je spojeno se specifickým projektem sjednocení oboru rozpracovaným na Harvardské a Kolumbijské univerzitě. Samotná myšlenka jednotné sociologie je neoddělitelně vpletena do celého projektu americké sociologie jako vědy a své „čisté" vyjádření nalezla v úsilí prokázat „objektivitu a koherenci" sociologického myšlení/vědění. Zcela zřetelně také formovala profesní identitu oboru. Prostředkem zajištění vědecké integrity bylo především zajištění kontinuity teorie a praxe, ježby založilo a o něž by se mohlo opírat pevné metodologické „sebevědomí". Historická kontextualizace tohoto formativního období si klade za cíl sledovat, nakolik myšlenka sjednocené sociologie ovlivnila teoretické a metodologické perspektivy v rámci oboru i vlastní představy o možnosti jeho integrované výzkumné agendy.

33

Gorokhov, Sergey A. "Ecological philosophy: modern approaches and issues." Problems of Modern Education (Problemy Sovremennogo Obrazovaniya), no. 2, 2020 (2020): 22–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.31862/2218-8711-2020-2-22-29.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article considers ecophilosophy as a new branch of philosophy, formed at the intersection of such Sciences as biology, genetics, sociology, ecology, etc. Different approaches of identifying the essential characteristics of the interaction of man and nature are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the ideological approach when studying this problem. As the main conclusion, the author substantiates the thesis about the need to abandon the use of discrete approaches in the study of the interaction of society and the world around; a new paradigm of modern society development.

34

King, Anthony. "The Sociology of Sociology." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37, no. 4 (December 2007): 501–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393107307665.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Danilov, Alexander. "Applied Sociology of Professor G.P. Davidyuk and Revival of Sociological Science in the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 6 (2023): 144–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s013216250026397-9.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article examines the history of academic school of applied sociology of Professor G.P. Davidyuk (1923-2020), assesses his contribution to the revival of sociological science and the institutionalization of sociological education in Belarus. G.P. Davidyuk formed the first scientific structures of a sociological profile in Belarus (sector of social research, Department of sociological research of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Academy of Sciences of the BSSR; sector of applied sociology at the Department of Philosophy of Belarusian State University in Minsk, etc.), he wrote the first textbooks "Fundamentals of Applied Sociology" (1975) and "Applied Sociology" (1979). Under his editorship, the country's first "Dictionary of Applied Sociology" (1984) was prepared, the foundations were laid for professional sociologists training at the Belarusian State University (BSU), personnel of the highest scholarly qualification. In the 1970s and 1980s, the Problematic Research Laboratory of Sociological Research of BSU, headed by G.P. Davidyuk, turned into the country's leading scientific center. The work of the Applied sociology sector at the BSU gave an impetus to the development of industrial sociology.

36

Popkova, Natalia V. "Sociology of Philosophy: Development Difficulties." Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no. 8 (2019): 133–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s013216250006228-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Heidegren, Carl-Göran, and Henrik Lundberg. "Towards a Sociology of Philosophy." Acta Sociologica 53, no. 1 (March 2010): 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0001699309357831.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Collins, Randall, and Mario Bunge. "Sociology Rates High with Philosophy." Contemporary Sociology 28, no. 3 (May 1999): 282. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2654142.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Mikhaylov, Igor A. "The Path to “Normal Science” Through Existentialism." Voprosy Filosofii, no. 9 (2023): 157–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2023-9-157-161.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article reflects upon the developmet of professional history of philosophy, philosophy of science and theoretical sociology in Soviet Union in the 1950s and 1960s. The decisive contribution to the formation of modern historical and philosophical problems, as well as to modern disputes about the nature of philosophy and science, belongs to Piama Gaidenko. The author focuses on the role of studies in existentialism and the way its problematic shaped human and science studies in soviet philosophy. A small review article published in Voprosy Filosofii in 1959, the very first scientific paper by Gaidenko despite its formal status, appears to be an extremely important scientific document, revealing not only the characteristic personal style of the author soon to become famous, but also the full thematic structure of Gaidenko’s future works. Contrary to the common in the 50-60-s classification of existentialism as “irrationalism” and hence as hostile to science, this movement was the first to be studied as a region of contemporary philosophy thus fostering soviet philosophy to move away from harsh criticism of bourgeois philosophy and develop the branch of history of philosophy as “normal science”.

40

Crothers, Charles. "Administering CR to Resuscitate Sociology." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 48, no. 1 (July 26, 2017): 95–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393117720440.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Critical Realist meta-theoretical position in sociology and other social sciences has tended to remain on the margins of the mainstream. Porpora develops the case for reconstructing sociology through the more active deployment of Critical Realist tenets. In developing his reform agenda, Porpora reviews the contribution Critical Realist views could have on several key recalcitrant issues in sociological theory and assesses the comparative performances of an array of contemporary sociology approaches in contributing to each of these issues. This essay summarizes his argument and suggests extensions.

41

HUNTER, IAN. "THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY AND THE PERSONA OF THE PHILOSOPHER." Modern Intellectual History 4, no. 3 (October 4, 2007): 571–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244307001424.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Although history is the pre-eminent part of the gallant sciences, philosophers advise against it from fear that it might completely destroy the kingdom of darkness—that is, scholastic philosophy—which previously has been wrongly held to be a necessary instrument of theology.

42

Chiuchi, Oana Mariana. "The Entirety and the Interdisciplinarity in the Sociology of Petre Andrei." Anuarul Universitatii Petre Andrei din Iasi - Fascicula: Asistenta Sociala, Sociologie, Psihologie 29 (October 19, 2023): 102–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.18662/upasw/29/69.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The present paper is a synthetic presentation of Petre Andrei's conception regarding the integrality and interdisciplinarity of sociology as a science. Thus, the concept of completeness of sociology is summarized related to the object of study and also as a specific research method in the complex process of sociological investigation of the social life, as a set of components, conditions and types of activities. Also, the notion of the interdisciplinarity of sociology with other socio-human sciences (philosophy, history, psychology, pedagogy) is argued, as it emerges from the work of the Romanian sociologist.

43

Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Identities, and Naum Trajanovski. "The Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn; a review by Naum Trajanovski." Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture 18, no. 1-2 (December 10, 2021): 106–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.51151/identities.v18i1-2.483.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Author(s): Naum Trajanovski Title (English): A Review of the Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn Journal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021). Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - Skopje Page Range: 106-108 Page Count: 3 Citation (English): Naum Trajanovski, “A Review of the Partisan Counter-Archive: Retracing the Ruptures of Art and Memory in the Yugoslav People’s Liberation Struggle by Gal Kirn,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 18, No. 1-2 (2021): 106-108. Author Biography Naum Trajanovski, Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences. Naum Trajanovski (Graduate School for Social Research, Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences) is a PhD candidate at the GSSR. He was a project co-coordinator at the European Network Remembrance and Solidarity (2017) and a researcher at the Faculty of Philosophy, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University – Skopje (2018-2020). His major academic interests include memory politics in North Macedonia and sociological knowledge transfer in 1960s Eastern Europe. He authored several papers and a monograph, in Macedonian, on the memory politics in the state after 1991.

44

Robbins, Derek. "Sociology as Reflexive Science." Theory, Culture & Society 24, no. 5 (September 2007): 77–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276407081284.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The article focuses on the fact that the consequence of Bourdieu’s death is that we now have to respond specifically to the texts that he produced between 1958 and 2002, rather than to the impact of writing and political action in combination, which was his goal during his life. The article raises general questions about the status of social texts in relation to the practices of philosophy and social scientific enquiry to which Bourdieu must have returned in preparing his final course of lectures, published in 2001 as Science de la science et réflexivité. It then offers three case studies of this relationship in action in Bourdieu’s early work, considering his textual and scientific practices. It discusses aspects of the contemporary philosophical debate about the referentiality of texts at the time of this early work and thus indicates that this was a question of continuous importance in Bourdieu’s work. The article next reflects on the significance of Bourdieu’s thinking in this respect for the ways in which we should now respond to his texts and deploy his concepts empirically. It takes three examples of different ways in which Bourdieu’s texts have become pretexts for further research practice. These are characterized as ‘academic exploitation’, ‘nominal appropriation’ and ‘informed divergence’. The conclusion is that Bourdieu’s work demands a reflexive response, which requires that respondents should analyse rigorously their own situations and the grounds for transferring received concepts, and that this entails detailed attention to both Bourdieu’s texts and the contexts of their production, rather than a superficial exploitation or appropriation of his ‘consecrated’ texts.

45

Vandenberghe, Frédéric. "Sociology as Moral Philosophy (and Vice Versa)." Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 54, no. 4 (November 2017): 405–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cars.12168.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Wokler, Robert. "The French Revolutionary Roots of Political Modernity in Hegel's Philosophy, or the Enlightenment at Dusk." Hegel Bulletin 18, no. 01 (1997): 71–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0263523200001208.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Readers of Auguste Comte's Cours de Philosophie positive which began to appear just before Hegel's death might well have imagined, from the work's title, that they were about to confront an interpretation of Hegel's philosophical system. If Hegel himself had assembled his writings as systematically as his doctrines, that collective title would probably have embraced their meaning with greater accuracy than any other. The positivity of Comte's philosophy was of course strikingly different from Hegel's and was in a crucial sense meant to supplant it, replacing it with a genuinely scientific understanding of society, just as metaphysics had earlier overturned theology. Over the past hundred and fifty years or so, Comte's positive philosophy – which he also termed sociology – has in its various formulations by his disciples come to encapsulate the proper agenda of the human sciences for a post-metaphysical, post-Hegelian, age.

47

Mennell, Stephen. "Sociogenesis and Psychogenesis: Norbert Elias’s Historical Social Psychology as a Research Tradition in Comparative Sociology." Comparative Sociology 14, no. 4 (October 13, 2015): 548–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341357.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

What is widely known as ‘figurational sociology’, or alternatively ‘process sociology’, is the research tradition stemming from the writings of Norbert Elias. The tradition extends beyond sociology to historians and many other branches of the social sciences. Elias’s Collected Works run to 18 volumes, but the bedrock of his oeuvre is his early study On the Process of Civilisation, in which the interrelation of long-term sociogenetic processes like state-formation and equally long-term psychogenetic processes like conscience- and habitus-formation is first clearly elaborated. Of the many directions in which the theory has been subsequently developed, the most important is Elias’s sociological theory of knowledge and the sciences, which involves a radical rejection of central assumptions of Western philosophy.

48

Simonyan, Renald H. "Social Philosophy, Social Studies or Generality: the Problem of the Crisis of Sociology." Voprosy Filosofii, no. 3 (2021): 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2021-3-29-40.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In recent decades, the crisis of sociology has been increasingly discussed in the social science discourse. Many well-known Russian and foreign sociologists have already spoken out on this issue. Discussions about the theoretical decline, the decline in the social status of sociological science, its transformation from fundamental to applied knowledge are reproduced at congresses and conferences, in numerous publications. The bibliography devoted to the crisis of sociology has dozens of sources, and this stream does not decrease. In line with this popular topic, the author substantiates his approach to the analysis of the crisis problem in sociology, which is based on epistemological contradictions laid down in the creation of the specialized science of society in the middle of the 19th century – during the rise of positivism, which denies classical philosophy and focuses on an empirical approach, demonstrated high efficiency in the natural sciences, yielding positive results. The article substantiates that the rejection of abstract thinking, the narrowing of the boundaries of knowledge to the framework of empirical knowledge, the reduction of cognitive activity to practical experience, the primacy of methodology over theory are the birth traumas of sociology that brought it to its current position.

49

Machado Neto, Raul. "Internationalization at the University of São Paulo." Revista de Medicina 95, spe3 (August 26, 2016): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.1679-9836.v95ispe3p5-6.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The University of São Paulo, founded in 1934, started under the influence of important foreigners academicians in our campuses. The beginning of our university was the result of a fusion of the already existing colleges – Law School, School of Engineering, School of Pharmacy and Dentistry, College of Agriculture, Medical School, and School of Veterinary Medicine. In addition, in 1934, the School of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters was created being responsible for human sciences – Philosophy, History, Geography, Sociology – and hard sciences – Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry – that academically amalgamated the professional existing colleges. In the thirties, we benefited from the instabilities in Europe and important professors came to the University of São Paulo contributing remarkably to our successful trajectory.[...]

50

Clammer, John. "Sociology and Beyond: Towards A Deep Sociology." Asian Journal of Social Science 37, no. 3 (2009): 332–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156853109x436757.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

AbstractThis paper explores potential new directions for a sociology linked more to Asian social theory and to new forms of knowledge emerging from ecology and the new social movements than to its older foundations in Western philosophy and conceptions of society. It suggests that there is a route beyond the trajectory of modernist and postmodernist social thinking and it calls into question the anthropocentric, Cartesian and dualistic assumptions of most conventional sociology. It does so by exploring the possible relationships between sociology and the existential issues thrown up by Asian philosophical and religious traditions, and in particular Buddhism, and the in many ways parallel arguments of Deep Ecology. In doing so it calls into question the adequacy of current sociology as a vehicle for addressing fundamental existential questions and in particular the issues of social suffering, the emerging ecological crisis and the alternative conceptions of society generated by many of the new social movements, and suggests ways in which this inadequacy might potentially be resolved.

Статті в журналах з теми "Sociology and philosophy of sciences"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями