Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Reasoning / Статті в журналах

Статті в журналах з теми "Reasoning"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Reasoning.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021

Оновлено: 29 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Reasoning".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Bremner, Andrew J., and Denis Mareschal. "Reasoning . . . what reasoning?" Developmental Science 7, no. 4 (September 2004): 419–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00360.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Foos, Paul W. "Reasoning About Reasoning." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 41, no. 9 (September 1996): 917–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/003142.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Mata, André, Klaus Fiedler, Mário B. Ferreira, and Tiago Almeida. "Reasoning about others' reasoning." Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49, no. 3 (May 2013): 486–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.010.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Alaoui, Larbi, Katharina A. Janezic, and Antonio Penta. "Reasoning about others' reasoning." Journal of Economic Theory 189 (September 2020): 105091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2020.105091.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Hafizallah, Yandi. "Pemikiran Abed Al-Jabiri Terhadap Nalar Arab." MAWA'IZH: JURNAL DAKWAH DAN PENGEMBANGAN SOSIAL KEMANUSIAAN 10, no. 1 (July 18, 2019): 60–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.32923/maw.v10i1.742.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This paper aims to explain and analyze the epistemological aspects based on the thoughts of Abed al-Jabiri, especially regarding the thinking of three Arabic reasoning of al-Jabiri. The study refers to three thoughts of Arabic al-Jabiri reasoning about epistemology namely: "epistemology of Bayani", the epistemology of Irfani ", and" epistemology of Burhani". The search for the texts relating to the three epistemologies produces several findings in this study, among others: 1) Relevance between three Arabic reasoning that does not always stand alone but all three reasoning are also integrated with each other, even though Arabic reasoning is a formation from a culture; 2) The shift of reasoning culture analyzed using the socio-historical approach to the development of Arabic reasoning makes Jabiri make Arabic reasoning a "thinking structure", each of which has advantages and disadvantages; 3) The criticisms of the reasoning model conducted by Abed al-Jabiri are used to formulate methods of understanding knowledge. The three Arabic reasonings described by abed al-Jabiri rely on aspects emphasized in reason and reality, philosophy and science, and revelation texts and Nash.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

NAKAJIMA, Nobuyuki. "Inference, Reasoning, and Fuzzy Reasoning." Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems 6, no. 6 (1994): 1105–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3156/jfuzzy.6.6_1105.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Rice, Hugh. "IV—Practical Reasoning as Reasoning." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 89, no. 1 (June 1, 1989): 49–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/89.1.49.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Cave, Peter. "Reeling and A-Reasoning: Surprise Examinations and Newcomb's Tale." Philosophy 79, no. 4 (October 2004): 609–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031819104000476.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Certain paradoxes set us reeling endlessly. In surprise examination paradoxes, pupils' reasonings lead them to reel between expecting an examination and expecting none. With Newcomb's puzzle, choosers reel between reasoning in favour of choosing just one box and choosing two. The paradoxes demand an answer to what it is rational to believe or do. Highlighting other reelings and puzzles, this paper shows that the paradoxes should come as no surprise. The paradoxes demand an end to our reasoning when the conditions they set ensure no end. They equivocate between, so to speak, reasoning in heaven and reasoning on earth; and, on the conditions set, not even an infinite god could reach a conclusion.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Grusenmeyer, Corinne, and Alain Trognon. "Structures of natural reasoning within functional dialogues." Pragmatics and Cognition 4, no. 2 (January 1, 1996): 305–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.4.2.06gru.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The aim of this paper is to describe and characterize some structural features of natural reasoning by analyzing a number of conversations held by operators during shift changeovers. During this work phase the operators have to cooperate in order to carry out the same process. This need to cooperate leads to dialogues and joint elaboration of information, especially when involving the reporting of a malfunction. Three dialogues observed at this work phase on two study sites (a paper mill and a nuclear power plant) are analyzed. These analyses show that the step by step follow-up of the operators' collective reasoning is feasible. They highlight that these reasonings are complex experimental and hypothetico-deductive reasonings. They are reasonings for action, that are elaborated as the conversation unfolds, and for which the operators do not always have the means of testing their hypotheses.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Rips, L. J. "Reasoning." Annual Review of Psychology 41, no. 1 (January 1990): 321–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.001541.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Lin, Hanti, and Kevin T. Kelly. "Propositional Reasoning that Tracks Probabilistic Reasoning." Journal of Philosophical Logic 41, no. 6 (June 29, 2012): 957–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10992-012-9237-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Abdolmohammadi, Mohammad J., and M. Francis Reeves. "Does Group Reasoning Improve Ethical Reasoning?" Business and Society Review 108, no. 1 (February 21, 2003): 127–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8594.00001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Samuel, Geoffrey. "Is legal reasoning like medical reasoning?" Legal Studies 35, no. 2 (June 2015): 323–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12063.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In this paper, stimulated by the publication some years ago in France of a small book on medical reasoning, legal and medical reasoning are compared. The question that is asked is whether the differences between the two types of reasoning will permit one to have a better understanding of some of the methodological and epistemological issues associated with legal reasoning. It will be argued that although medical and legal reasoners do share things in common, legal reasoning, perhaps unlike medical reasoning, is actually concerned less with the explanation or even comprehension of texts or the facts of a dispute (explicatio causæ) and more with what will be termed the ‘manipulation’ of facts (accommodatio factorum). Lawyers purify and (or) construct ‘virtual’ factual situations out of perceived ‘actual’ factual situations in order to make them conform or not conform in an isomorphic way with factual situations implied by a legal text or precedent. Medical reasoning is equally complex but facts are read in a different way.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Galotti, Kathleen M. "Reasoning about Reasoning: A Course Project." Teaching of Psychology 22, no. 1 (February 1995): 66–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top2201_20.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Li, Weizhuo, Guilin Qi, and Qiu Ji. "Hybrid reasoning in knowledge graphs: Combing symbolic reasoning and statistical reasoning." Semantic Web 11, no. 1 (January 31, 2020): 53–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/sw-190375.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Brunet, Josée. "La conception du raisonnement de John Broome: «Que nous exprimons-nous lorsque nous raisonnons?»." Dialogue 47, no. 3-4 (2008): 633–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0012217300002882.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

ABSTRACTThis article offers a critical analysis of John Broome's conception of practical reasoning. I first introduce his main claims and then point out some of the difficulties raised by the notion of “double expression” and by some aspects of the cognitivism which he explicitly endorses. I then emphasize two consequences of these criticisms: one concerning the link he sees between belief and intention, and the other concerning the idea that our practical reasonings are inextricably linked to our theoretical reasonings. Finally, I argue that the problem Broome seems to be facing has its source in the difficulty of distinguishing clearly between reasoning (a relation between mental states) and the description of its content (a relation between propositions).

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

MacColl, San. "The Context of Reasoning and Teaching Reasoning." Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 11, no. 2 (1994): 25–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/thinking199411229.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Leighton, Jacqueline P. "Reasoning Strategies and the Fundamental Reasoning Mechanism." Contemporary Psychology 46, no. 4 (August 2001): 407–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/002466.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

de Oliveira, Wellington. "Discussing Reasoning, Creating, Interaction and Social Reasoning." Mind, Culture, and Activity 17, no. 3 (July 28, 2010): 295–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10749030903480731.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Newstead, Stephen E. "Inductive reasoning, deductive reasoning and mental models." International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8, no. 1 (January 1994): 65–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698599408573483.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Heit, Evan, and Caren M. Rotello. "Relations between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 36, no. 3 (2010): 805–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018784.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Asarnow, Samuel. "The Reasoning View and Defeasible Practical Reasoning." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 95, no. 3 (September 11, 2017): 614–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12446.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Evans, Jonathan St B. T. "Reflections on reasoning and reasoning about reflection." Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11, no. 10 (October 2007): 412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.07.004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Gampa, Anup, Sean P. Wojcik, Matt Motyl, Brian A. Nosek, and Peter H. Ditto. "(Ideo)Logical Reasoning: Ideology Impairs Sound Reasoning." Social Psychological and Personality Science 10, no. 8 (March 5, 2019): 1075–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1948550619829059.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Beliefs shape how people interpret information and may impair how people engage in logical reasoning. In three studies, we show how ideological beliefs impair people’s ability to (1) recognize logical validity in arguments that oppose their political beliefs and (2) recognize the lack of logical validity in arguments that support their political beliefs. We observed belief bias effects among liberals and conservatives who evaluated the logical soundness of classically structured logical syllogisms supporting liberal or conservative beliefs. Both liberals and conservatives frequently evaluated the logical structure of entire arguments based on the believability of arguments’ conclusions, leading to predictable patterns of logical errors. As a result, liberals were better at identifying flawed arguments supporting conservative beliefs and conservatives were better at identifying flawed arguments supporting liberal beliefs. These findings illuminate one key mechanism for how political beliefs distort people’s abilities to reason about political topics soundly.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Atkinson, Katie, and Trevor Bench-Capon. "Legal Case-based Reasoning as Practical Reasoning." Artificial Intelligence and Law 13, no. 1 (March 2005): 93–131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10506-006-9003-3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Tsukimoto, Hiroshi. "Pattern reasoning: Logical reasoning of neural networks." Systems and Computers in Japan 32, no. 2 (2001): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1520-684x(200102)32:2<1::aid-scj1>3.0.co;2-o.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Bao, Zhijun, and Xue Zhang. "The Construction of Shared Wisdom Teaching Practice through IoT Based on the Perspective of Industry-Education Integration." Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 2022 (August 28, 2022): 1–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7298400.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In this paper, to solve the difficulties of overseeing battling reasonings in cordial projects, we use a training-based insight perspective. Based on previous research, managing the tension between friendly government assistance and business is clearly a vital task for social money managers. Accomplishment. Though the social government helps reasoning and its associated characteristics and practices structure the underpinnings of social endeavours, social finance managers similarly need to ensure that their associations are financially sensible, making it essential to attract business reasoning. To this end, we cultivate an instructive program structure taking into account social practice intelligence to assist understudies in getting reasonable data and capacities, organize social business with venturing targets, and consolidate battling reasonings in inventive and legitimate ways.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Luo, Xudong, and Chengqi Zhang. "LSLNCF: A Hybrid Uncertain Reasoning Model Based on Probability." International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 06, no. 04 (August 1998): 401–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s021848859800032x.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The "take-them-in-or-leave-them-out" of prior probabilities is a key problem in uncertain reasonings. The EMYCIN uncertain reasoning model is inconsistent with probability theory, due to 'leaving them out', while the PROSPECTOR uncertain reasoning model is substantially consistent with probability theory, due to 'taking them in'. This presents a difficult task for human experts when supplying prior probabilities. In this paper, in order to overcome the difficulty, we propose a hybrid uncertain reasoning model, by combing rule strengths in the PROSPECTOR model with rule strengths in the EMYCIN model. Moreover, different forms of rule strength will enable human experts to supply values for the rule strengths more flexibly in a knowledge base. Finally, an example is given to illustrate the power of our methodology.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Zhao, Shan, and Hongxing Li. "The Construction of Type-2 Fuzzy Reasoning Relations for Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Systems." Journal of Applied Mathematics 2014 (2014): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/459508.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Type-2 fuzzy reasoning relations are the type-2 fuzzy relations obtained from a group of type-2 fuzzy reasonings by using extended t-(co)norm, which are essential for implementing type-2 fuzzy logic systems. In this paper an algorithm is provided for constructing type-2 fuzzy reasoning relations of SISO type-2 fuzzy logic systems. First, we give some properties of extended t-(co)norm and simplify the expression of type-2 fuzzy reasoning relations in accordance with different input subdomains under certain conditions. And then different techniques are discussed to solve the simplified expressions on the input subdomains by using the related methods on solving fuzzy relation equations. Besides, it is pointed out that the computation amount level of the proposed algorithm is the same as that of polynomials and the possibility of applying the proposed algorithm in the construction of type-2 fuzzy reasoning relations is illustrated on several examples. Finally, the calculation of an arbitrary extended continuous t-norm can be obtained as the special case of the proposed algorithm.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Merritt, Maria, and Jodi Halpern. "Emotional Reasoning." Hastings Center Report 32, no. 5 (September 2002): 45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3528714.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Gooch, Sally, Sue Haworth, Rebecca Malby, Steve Wright, and John Atkinson. "Imperfect reasoning." Nursing Standard 3, no. 50 (September 9, 1989): 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.3.50.51.s65.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

NISHIDA, Toyoaki. "Qualitative Reasoning." Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems 4, no. 4 (1992): 591–607. http://dx.doi.org/10.3156/jfuzzy.4.4_591.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

BABAGUCHI, Noboru. "Nonmonotonic Reasoning." Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems 4, no. 4 (1992): 608–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3156/jfuzzy.4.4_608.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

ISHIZUKA, Mitsuru. "Hypothetical Reasoning." Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Systems 4, no. 4 (1992): 620–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3156/jfuzzy.4.4_620.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Wos, L. "Automated Reasoning." American Mathematical Monthly 92, no. 2 (February 1985): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2322633.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Gavanelli, Marco, and Toni Mancini. "Automated reasoning." Intelligenza Artificiale 7, no. 2 (2013): 113–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ia-130053.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Grigorita, Liliana, Andreea Stan, and Boban Thomas. "Diagnostic Reasoning." Annals of Internal Medicine 168, no. 10 (May 15, 2018): 751. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/l18-0009.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Mitchell, David M. "Diagnostic Reasoning." Annals of Internal Medicine 168, no. 10 (May 15, 2018): 750. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/l18-0010.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Griner, Paul F. "Diagnostic Reasoning." Annals of Internal Medicine 168, no. 10 (May 15, 2018): 750. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/l18-0011.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Simpkin, Arabella L., Jatin M. Vyas, and Katrina A. Armstrong. "Diagnostic Reasoning." Annals of Internal Medicine 168, no. 10 (May 15, 2018): 751. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/l18-0012.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Tselishchev, Vitaly V. "Mathematical Reasoning." Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 57, no. 4 (2020): 74–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/eps202057459.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The article is devoted to the comparison of two types of proofs in mathematical practice, the methodological differences of which go back to the difference in the understanding of the nature of mathematics by Descartes and Leibniz. In modern philosophy of mathematics, we talk about conceptual and formal proofs in connection with the so-called Hilbert Thesis, according to which every proof can be transformed into a logical conclusion in a suitable formal system. The analysis of the arguments of the proponents and opponents of the Thesis, “conceptualists” and “formalists”, is presented respectively by the two main antagonists – Y. Rav and J. Azzouni. The focus is on the possibility of reproducing the proof of “interesting” mathematical theorems in the form of a strict logical conclusion, in principle feasible by a mechanical procedure. The argument of conceptualists is based on pointing out the importance of other aspects of the proof besides the logical conclusion, namely, in introducing new concepts, methods, and establishing connections between different sections of meaningful mathematics, which is often illustrated by the case of proving Fermat’s Last Theorem (Y. Rav). Formalists say that a conceptual proof “points” to the formal logical structure of the proof (J. Azzouni). The article shows that the disagreement is based on the assumption of asymmetry of mutual translation of syntactic and semantic structures of the language, as a result of which the formal proof loses important semantic factors of proof. In favor of a formal proof, the program of univalent foundations of mathematics In. Vojevodski, according to which the future of mathematical proofs is associated with the availability of computer verification programs. In favor of conceptual proofs, it is stated (A. Pelc) that the number of steps in the supposed formal logical conclusion when proving an “interesting” theorem exceeds the cognitive abilities of a person. The latter circumstance leads the controversy beyond the actual topic of mathematical proof into the epistemological sphere of discussions of “mentalists” and “mechanists” on the question of the supposed superiority of human intelligence over the machine, initiated by R. Penrose in his interpretation of the Second Theorem of Goedel, among whose supporters, as it turned out, was Goedel himself.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Wolfe, Katharine. "Reclaiming Reasoning." Teaching Philosophy 45, no. 2 (2022): 209–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/teachphil202234160.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article traces my own pedagogical journey to find strategies for teaching critical thinking that emphasize intellectual cooperation, empathy, and argument repair, a journey that found me frequently turning to sources outside of philosophy, including work in intergroup dialogue and pedagogical work in rhetoric and composition. Theoretically, the article showcases Maureen Linker’s notion of ‘cooperative reasoning’ (2015), sets it against the ‘adversary paradigm’ Janice Moulton critiques, and illustrates how Peter Elbow’s challenges to critical thinking as a ‘doubting game’ resonate with Linker’s work. Practically, it illustrates the structure and the role of peer-to-peer dialogues in my own reasoning classroom, an enactment of a cooperative, belief-based approach to reasoning inspired by Linker and Elbow alike, while also learning from the methodologies of intergroup dialogue.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Poulter, Martin. "Critical Reasoning." Cogito 12, no. 3 (1998): 227–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/cogito199812336.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Thayer-Bacon, Barbara J. "Caring Reasoning." Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 19, no. 4 (2000): 22–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/inquiryctnews200019422.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Aronson, Jerrold L. "Scientific Reasoning." International Studies in Philosophy 23, no. 3 (1991): 120–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil1991233100.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

West, Henry R. "Practical Reasoning." International Studies in Philosophy 24, no. 3 (1992): 118. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil1992243116.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Cannon, Dale, and Mark Weinstein. "Reasoning Skills." Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children 6, no. 1 (1985): 29–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/thinking19856134.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Chang, Kuo-Liang. "Redeem Reasoning." Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 18, no. 7 (March 2013): 396–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5951/mathteacmiddscho.18.7.0396.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Kassirer, Jerome P. "Diagnostic Reasoning." Annals of Internal Medicine 110, no. 11 (June 1, 1989): 893. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-110-11-893.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Goldstick, D. "Circular Reasoning." International Studies in Philosophy 35, no. 4 (2003): 129–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil20033548.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!