Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Re-prosecution"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Re-prosecution".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Re-prosecution"
Cole, T. B. "RE: "THE FAILURE OF ACADEMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY: WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION"." American Journal of Epidemiology 146, no. 9 (November 1, 1997): 788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009359.
Повний текст джерелаBhopal, R. S. "RE: "THE FAILURE OF ACADEMIC EPIDEMIOLOGY: WITNESS FOR THE PROSECUTION"." American Journal of Epidemiology 149, no. 5 (March 1, 1999): 485–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009837.
Повний текст джерелаAnderton, John. "Patent prosecution history as a predictor of re-examination success." Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 2, no. 7 (June 8, 2007): 467–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpm075.
Повний текст джерелаNugraha, Yodi. "OPTIMALISASI ASAS OPORTUNITAS PADA KEWENANGAN JAKSA GUNA MEMINIMALISIR DAMPAK PRIMUM REMEDIUM DALAM PEMIDANAAN." Veritas et Justitia 6, no. 1 (June 28, 2020): 213–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.25123/vej.3882.
Повний текст джерелаARMSTRONG, J. "The Publication, Prosecution, and Re-publication of James Hanley's Boy (1931)." Library s6-19, no. 4 (January 1, 1997): 351–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/library/s6-19.4.351.
Повний текст джерелаArmstrong, J. "The publication, prosecution, and re-publication of James Hanley's Boy (1931)." Library 19, no. 4 (December 1, 1997): 351–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/library/19.4.351.
Повний текст джерелаGlaser, Sebastian, and Sarah Hartmann. "CJEU: Germany’s Public Prosecution Authorities Cannot be Regarded as a “Judicial Authority” with Regard to EAWs—The Truth or a Misconstrual of the Legal Reality?" German Law Journal 23, no. 4 (May 2022): 650–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.36.
Повний текст джерелаOberman, Michelle. "Two Truths and a Lie: In re John Z. and Other Stories at the Juncture of Teen Sex and the Law." Law & Social Inquiry 38, no. 02 (2013): 364–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01310.x.
Повний текст джерелаSmith, Bradford L. "In Re Letter of Request from Crown Prosecution Service of United Kingdom." American Journal of International Law 83, no. 4 (October 1989): 929–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2203384.
Повний текст джерелаAppludnopsanji, Appludnopsanji, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. "Restrukturisasi Budaya Hukum Kejaksaan Dalam Penuntutan Sebagai Independensi di Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia." SASI 26, no. 4 (December 30, 2020): 571. http://dx.doi.org/10.47268/sasi.v26i4.359.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Re-prosecution"
Aboueldahab, Noha. "Re-thinking transitional justice : the prosecution of political leaders in the Arab Region : a comparative case study of Egypt, Libya, Tunisia and Yemen." Thesis, Durham University, 2015. http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/11354/.
Повний текст джерелаКниги з теми "Re-prosecution"
Fa lü jian du re dian wen ti yan jiu: Studying the hot topics of legal supervision. Shanghai Shi: Shanghai jiao tong da xue chu ban she, 2011.
Знайти повний текст джерелаDang dai jian cha li lun yu shi jian re dian wen ti yan jiu. Shanghai Shi: Shanghai jiao tong da xue chu ban she, 2009.
Знайти повний текст джерелаJian cha ji guan shi yong xin xing shi su song fa re dian nan dian wen ti yan jiu. Beijing Shi: Zhonghua shu ju, 2013.
Знайти повний текст джерела1817-1892, Murfree William L., ed. Hints on advocacy: Intended for practitioners in civil and criminal courts : with suggestions as to opening a case, examination-in-chief, cross-examination, re-examination, reply, conduct of a prosecution and of a defense, etc., and illustrative cases. 2nd ed. Littleton, Colo: F.B. Rothman, 1994.
Знайти повний текст джерелаJeyya, Kyoʻ. Cā pe reʺ sāʺ Phranʻʹ khyi khraṅʻʺ phraṅʻʹ ʾA sa re phyakʻ khraṅʻʺ chuiṅʻ rā Upade. Ranʻ kunʻ: Ca kāʺ pro ne sū myāʺ Cā pe, 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаRaffe, Alasdair. Scotland. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199644636.003.0008.
Повний текст джерелаSchabas, William A. The Trial of the Kaiser. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833857.001.0001.
Повний текст джерелаLos Tribunales Penales Internacionales Ad Hoc Para La Ex Yugoslavia y Ruanda: Organizacion, Proceso y Prueba: Incluye Traduccion Al Espa~nol de Las Re. Not Avail, 2003.
Знайти повний текст джерелаThe UN International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаSchabas, William A. un International Criminal Tribunals: The Former Yugoslavia, Rwanda and Sierra Leone. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Re-prosecution"
Wölfel, Ute. "The End of Transgression: Fritz Bauer as Traitor on the German Screen." In Mediating War and Identity, 75–96. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474446266.003.0005.
Повний текст джерелаWalker, Lorenn, and Cheri Tarutani. "Restorative Justice and Violence Against Women in the United States." In Therapeutic Jurisprudence and Overcoming Violence Against Women, 63–84. IGI Global, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2472-4.ch005.
Повний текст джерелаChoo, Andrew L.-T. "3. The Course of Evidence." In Evidence. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806844.003.0003.
Повний текст джерелаChoo, Andrew L.-T. "3. The Course of Evidence." In Evidence, 51–83. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198864172.003.0003.
Повний текст джерелаBrown, Andrew. "Restoration." In Bound by Muscle, 188—C12.N104. Oxford University PressNew York, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197582633.003.0012.
Повний текст джерелаEstevane, Gregorio. "“Presumed Guilty” or “Dirtying Up the Defendant”: Criminal Gang Enhancement Prosecutions in California and Police/Prosecution Misconduct." In The Re-Evolution of American Street Gangs, 249–314. CRC Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/b19237-14.
Повний текст джерелаOcampo, Luis Moreno. "War and Justice in the Gaddafi Case." In War and Justice in the 21st Century, 465—C20.N79. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197628973.003.0021.
Повний текст джерелаMulcahy, Jane. "Re-storying Offending Behaviour: A Normal Response to an Overdose of Trauma?" In Giving Voice to Diversity in Criminological Research, 89–110. Policy Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529215526.003.0005.
Повний текст джерела"• Indictable offences – such as rape, robbery and murder; • Summary offences – such as insulting behaviour, common assault and indecent exposure; • Offences triable either way – such as theft, criminal damage (depending on the value of the property damaged), assault occasioning bodily harm contrary to s 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, and indecent assault. Indictable offences are triable only in the Crown Court before a judge and jury. Summary offences are triable only in the magistrates’ court. Offences triable either way may be tried before either court, depending on the circumstances, in particular the seriousness of the offence and the preferences expressed by the prosecution and defendant; see further s 14 of the Criminal Law Act 1977, as re-enacted by ss 17–25 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980. Classification by reference to police powers." In Sourcebook Criminal Law, 58. Routledge-Cavendish, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843143093-50.
Повний текст джерела"The extent to which a conviction can be regarded as ‘safe’, notwithstanding unfairness in the trial process, has had to be re-considered following the enactment of the Human Rights Act 1998, and the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in R v Condron [2000] Crim LR 679. The result is that the Court of Appeal should not disengage the issue of the fairness of the trial from the issue of whether or not the conviction is safe. In essence significant violations of the right to a fair trial provided by Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights are, of themselves, likely to render a conviction unsafe; see further R v Francom (2000) The Times, 24 October. In R v Togher and Others (2000) The Times, 21 November, Lord Woolf CJ went so far as observe that the approach of the Court of Appeal should be in step with that of the European Court of Human Rights with the result that the denial of a fair trial contrary to Art 6 would now inevitably lead to a finding that the resulting conviction was unsafe. Such a conclusion is a direct result of the obligation created by s3(1) of the Human Rights Act 1998 to the effect that domestic legislation, such as the Criminal Appeal Act 1995, should be read, so far as possible, in a manner that gave effect to Convention rights. R v Davis (2000) The Times, 25 July, whilst not departing from this broad proposition, emphasises that it may still be necessary to look at the circumstances of a particular case before concluding that a violation of Art 6 has rendered a conviction unsafe – it will be a matter of fact and degree. Even if an appeal against conviction succeeds the accused may still face a retrial. The Court of Appeal has the discretion to order a retrial under s 7 of the 1968 Act if it appears to the court that the interests of justice so require. If there has been a total mistrial the Court of Appeal can issue a writ of venire de novo – setting events back to where they were before the irregularity that rendered the trial a mistrial occurred. Some appeals against conviction will be partially successful in that the Court of Appeal can allow the appeal but substitute a conviction for a lesser-included offence – an obvious example being the quashing of a murder conviction and the substitution of a conviction for manslaughter. Appeal by the prosecution: against over lenient sentences." In Sourcebook Criminal Law, 72–73. Routledge-Cavendish, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843143093-54.
Повний текст джерела