Статті в журналах з теми "Publin versus private"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Publin versus private.

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Publin versus private".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Aussenegg, Wolfgang. "Privatization versus Private Sector Initial Public Offerings in Poland." Multinational Finance Journal 4, no. 1/2 (June 1, 2000): 69–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17578/4-1/2-4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Pettet †, Ben. "Private versus Public Regulation." European Business Law Review 11, Issue 5 (September 1, 2000): 381–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/275271.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Draper, Paul, and Krishna Paudyal. "Acquisitions: Private versus Public." European Financial Management 12, no. 1 (January 2006): 57–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1354-7798.2006.00310.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Bracey, Gerald W. "Public versus Private … Again." Phi Delta Kappan 89, no. 5 (January 2008): 396–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/003172170808900521.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Stulz, René M. "Public versus private equity." Oxford Review of Economic Policy 36, no. 2 (2020): 275–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa003.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract The last 20 years or so have seen a sharp decline in public equity. I present a framework that explains the forces that cause the listing propensity of firms to change over time. This framework highlights the benefits and costs of a public listing compared to the benefits and costs of financing with private equity. With this framework, the decline in public equity is explained by the increased supply of funds for private equity and changes in the nature of firms. The increase in the importance of intangible assets makes it costlier for young firms to be public when the alternative is funding through private equity from investors who have specialized knowledge that enables them to better understand the business model of young firms and contribute to the development of that business model in contrast to passive public equity investors.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Monnet, Cyril. "PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC MONEY*." International Economic Review 47, no. 3 (August 2006): 951–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00401.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Held, Gilbert. "Public versus private WiFi." International Journal of Network Management 15, no. 5 (2005): 295–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nem.560.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Celeste, Edoardo, Sorcha Montgomery, and Arthit Suriyawongkul. "Digital technology and privacy attitudes in times of COVID-19: formal legality versus legal reality in Ireland." Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 73, no. 2 (July 28, 2022): 283–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.53386/nilq.v73i2.959.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The adoption of digital technologies to counteract the spread of COVID-19 has resulted in a major exposure of our rights to privacy and data protection. An empirical study conducted in Ireland by the Science Foundation Ireland-funded project PRIVATT demonstrates that privacy attitudes have shifted, resulting in a greater willingness to share personal data in order to combat the pandemic, while, at the same time, upholding a persistent mistrust in the public and private institutions overseeing this global health crisis. This article interprets these findings from a socio-legal perspective, arguing that people tend to overlook the inalienable nature of the essence of their rights to privacy and data protection, the compression of which is not admissible under EU law. Moreover, the widespread mistrust of public and private actors evidences a divergence between the formal legality of the technological solutions adopted and the legal reality that brings about the Irish public’s perception of government measures as potentially infringing their fundamental rights. These considerations will prompt recommendations in pursuit of enhancing transparency, involvement in decision-making processes and data protection literacy amongst the population.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Vila, Natalia, and Inés Küster. "Public versus private broadcasters’ management." Management Decision 52, no. 8 (September 9, 2014): 1368–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-05-2013-0295.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to prove the existence of significant differences between private and public corporate credibility antecedents and effects. Design/methodology/approach – Totally, 816 Spanish viewers’ valuations were obtained (408 for the public television network and 408 for four private first generation broadcasters). Results show that some corporate reputation antecedents (perceived quality) and effects (attitudes) are stronger when private broadcasters are considered. Findings – Result show that proposed credibility reputation antecedents and effects are significant and that some differences between private and public entities really do exist. Research limitations/implications – To enhance a television network's reputation managers can follow two different but related paths: improve the quality and improve the consistency of the network's visual identity. That is, they should act on both content and form. However, public or private commercial broadcasters should emphasize different ways. Practical implications – The general impressions subsumed under the concept of corporate credibility are used to easily and automatically evaluate particular offers. Originality/value – Show, in the broadcasting industry, that new challenges and responsibilities for public broadcasting services in this new digital era of liberalization do really exist compared to private companies.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Eskildsen, Jacob K., Kai Kristensen, and Hans Jørn Juhl. "Private versus public sector excellence." TQM Magazine 16, no. 1 (February 2004): 50–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09544780410511489.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
11

Grula, John W. "Private versus public energy solutions." Physics Today 65, no. 7 (July 2012): 10–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/pt.3.1621.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
12

Foster, Drew. "Private Journals versus Public Blogs." Teaching Sociology 43, no. 2 (January 20, 2015): 104–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0092055x14568204.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
13

Rocheleau, Bruce, and Liangfu Wu. "Public Versus Private Information Systems." American Review of Public Administration 32, no. 4 (December 2002): 379–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/027507402237866.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
14

Clements, Matthew T. "Public versus Private Information Provision." Economic Papers: A journal of applied economics and policy 33, no. 4 (December 2014): 391–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12087.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
15

Willig, Robert D. "Public versus Regulated Private Enterprise." World Bank Economic Review 7, suppl 1 (1993): 155–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/wber/7.suppl_1.155.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
16

Krueger, Dirk, and Fabrizio Perri. "Public versus private risk sharing." Journal of Economic Theory 146, no. 3 (May 2011): 920–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2010.08.013.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
17

SLAVOV, SITA NATARAJ. "Public Versus Private Provision of Public Goods." Journal of Public Economic Theory 16, no. 2 (August 15, 2013): 222–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpet.12058.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
18

Pagliari, Joseph L., Kevin A. Scherer, and Richard T. Monopoli. "Public versus Private Real Estate Equities." Journal of Portfolio Management 29, no. 5 (January 31, 2003): 101–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2003.319911.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
19

Baldwin, J. Norman. "Public Versus Private Employees: Debunking Stereotypes." Review of Public Personnel Administration 11, no. 1-2 (October 1990): 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0734371x9001100101.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
20

Willmore, Larry. "Public Versus Private Provision of Pensions." North American Actuarial Journal 5, no. 1 (January 2001): 129–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2001.10595967.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
21

Espiritu, Antonina. "Public versus Private Education in Hawaii." education policy analysis archives 9 (October 22, 2001): 43. http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v9n43.2001.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This study presents a time-series evidence on the timing and degree of feedback relationship between participation in education and income growth in Hawaii. Using the unrestricted vector autoregression approach and two related measures of linear dependence and feedback, the results suggest that across all educational levels, i.e., K-12 and tertiary, participation in public education could be a good predictor of income growth in Hawaii. However, decomposing the feedback effect by frequency suggests that the dominance of public education over private education in explaining the variation in income growth to be concentrated mainly on the short-run to medium-run for tertiary level and long-run to permanent effect for K-12 level. Hawaii state legislature and educators should perhaps take these results as a motivation not to ignore the problems plaguing Hawaii's public schools but should work towards greater improvement and support for public education given its predicted significant overall contribution to the Hawaiian economy.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
22

Barnett, Richard C., Joydeep Bhattacharya, and Mikko Puhakka. "Private versus public old-age security." Journal of Population Economics 31, no. 3 (December 15, 2017): 703–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00148-017-0681-9.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
23

Mansoorian, Arman, and Gordon M. Myers. "Private sector versus public sector externalities." Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, no. 5 (August 1996): 543–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(96)02133-3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
24

Beguin, H., and T. Ipanga. "Private versus public service location behaviour." Annals of Regional Science 25, no. 2 (June 1991): 115–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01581890.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
25

Penno, Mark, and Daniel T. Simon. "Accounting Choices: Public Versus Private Firms." Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 13, no. 4 (December 1986): 561–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.1986.tb00518.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
26

Nalla, Mahesh K., and Graeme R. Newman. "Public versus private control: A reassessment." Journal of Criminal Justice 19, no. 6 (January 1991): 537–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0047-2352(91)90065-4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
27

KAPLAN, BONNIE. "How Should Health Data Be Used?" Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25, no. 2 (March 9, 2016): 312–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180115000614.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract:Electronic health records, data sharing, big data, data mining, and secondary use are enabling exciting opportunities for improving health and healthcare while also exacerbating privacy concerns. Two court cases about selling prescription data, the Sorrell case in the U.S. and the Source case in the U.K., raise questions of what constitutes “privacy” and “public interest”; they present an opportunity for ethical analysis of data privacy, commodifying data for sale and ownership, combining public and private data, data for research, and transparency and consent. These interwoven issues involve discussion of big data benefits and harms and touch on common dualities of the individual versus the aggregate or the public interest, research (or, more broadly, innovation) versus privacy, individual versus institutional power, identification versus identity and authentication, and virtual versus real individuals and contextualized information. Transparency, flexibility, and accountability are needed for assessing appropriate, judicious, and ethical data uses and users, as some are more compatible with societal norms and values than others.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
28

Vincent-Jones. "The New Public Contracting: Public Versus Private Ordering?" Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 14, no. 2 (2007): 259. http://dx.doi.org/10.2979/gls.2007.14.2.259.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
29

Andersen, Jon Aarum. "Public versus Private Managers: How Public and Private Managers Differ in Leadership Behavior." Public Administration Review 70, no. 1 (January 2010): 131–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02117.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
30

Mancha, Andre, and Enlinson Mattos. "Public versus private wage differential in Brazilian public firms." EconomiA 21, no. 1 (January 2020): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2019.09.005.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
31

Gioffré, Alessandro, Alessandro Tampieri, and Antonio Villanacci. "Private versus public companies with strategic CSR." Journal of Economics 133, no. 2 (February 9, 2021): 129–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00712-020-00729-1.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractWe analyze the effects of strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on social welfare in an industry where firms are owned by consumers (publicly owned) and CSR commitment takes the form of a fraction of the consumer surplus into the firms’ objective function. We compare this market configuration with the standard case of firms owned by entrepreneurs (privately owned). In line with the empirical evidence, consumers’ ownership gives an incentive to adopt a socially responsible, welfare improving statute. While privately-owned companies are limited in the level of social concern to implement, publicly-owned companies are not, and CSR is welfare-improving for any level of social concern. Surprisingly, a market configuration of publicly-owned CSR companies decreases welfare compared to an oligopoly of privately-owned CSR companies. The analysis is then extended by considering asymmetric oligopolies with different company types.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
32

Benito, Bernardino, María-Dolores Guillamón, and Francisco Bastida. "Public versus Private in Municipal Services Management." Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 13, no. 4 (September 3, 2015): 995–1018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4335/13.3.995-1018(2015).

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Recent years have seen Spain and many other developed countries move more and more into outsourcing public service management on the grounds that production costs are higher in the public sector than in the private. However, there is often no empirical support that this is always the case. This paper shows that the private sector is not always more economical or better managed than the public one and, to the best of our knowledge, such a study had never been made in Spain. It draws on a survey by the Spanish Court of Auditors for a sample of municipalities, which analyzes public services like drinking water supply, street lighting, street cleaning and urban solid waste collection. Only in the case of lighting is private management cheaper and more efficient, although in larger municipal populations the opposite is true.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
33

Fontana, Magda, Martina Iori, Valerio Leone Sciabolazza, and Daniel Souza. "The interdisciplinarity dilemma: Public versus private interests." Research Policy 51, no. 7 (September 2022): 104553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104553.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
34

Hendrickson, Chris, and Tung Au. "Private versus Public Ownership of Constructed Facilities." Journal of Management in Engineering 1, no. 3 (July 1985): 119–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)9742-597x(1985)1:3(119).

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
35

Hoyt, B. "Public versus private: the medical resident perspective." Canadian Medical Association Journal 173, no. 8 (October 11, 2005): 898–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.051130.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
36

Besley, T., and M. Ghatak. "Government Versus Private Ownership of Public Goods." Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, no. 4 (November 1, 2001): 1343–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265598.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
37

Teeples, Ronald, Susan Feigenbaum, and David Glyer. "Public versus Private Water Delivery: Cost Comparisons." Public Finance Quarterly 14, no. 3 (July 1986): 351–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109114218601400307.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
We respond to criticisms raised by Robert McGuire and Robert Ohsfeldt concerning our comparative cost study of regulated private and public water delivery firms, Review of Economics and Statistics (November 1983). Summary results from our subsequent and ongoing research are included as empirical responses to their econometric questions. Model replications estimated from superior data confirm the 1983 results, that pooling of public-private cost functions cannot be rejected. In addition to conceptually defending our study methodology, we argue that cost comparisons, although difficult, are a legitimate means of assessing effects that alternative ownerships may have on production of water delivery services.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
38

Blumtritt, F. "Public BLSD training centre versus private providers." Resuscitation 81, no. 2 (December 2010): S86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.09.353.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
39

Shleifer, Andrei. "State versus Private Ownership." Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, no. 4 (November 1, 1998): 133–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.133.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Private ownership should generally be preferred to public ownership when the incentives to innovate and to contain costs must be strong. In essence, this is the case for capitalism over socialism, explaining the 'dynamic vitality' of free enterprise. The great economists of the 1930s and 1940s failed to see the dangers of socialism in part because they focused on the role of prices under socialism and capitalism and ignored the enormous importance of ownership as the source of capitalist incentives to innovate. Moreover, the concern that private firms fail to address 'social goals' can be addressed through government contracting and regulation, without resorting to government ownership. The case for private provision only becomes stronger when competition between suppliers, reputational mechanisms, the possibility of provision by private not-for-profit firms, as well as political patronage and corruption, are brought into play.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
40

Hodge, Hilary. "NHS Versus Private Care." Journal of the Royal Society of Health 112, no. 6 (December 1992): 306–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146642409211200621.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
41

Gao, Shengyi, and Robert A. Johnston. "Public versus Private Mobility for Low-Income Households." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2125, no. 1 (January 2009): 9–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2125-02.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
42

Mukherjee, Vivekananda, Gautam Gupta, and Sugata Marjit. "Private Contribution for Public Projects: Government versus NGOs." Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 159, no. 3 (2003): 553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1628/0932456032954819.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
43

Bonham, Carl, and James Mak. "Private versus Public Financing of State Destination Promotion." Journal of Travel Research 35, no. 2 (October 1996): 3–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004728759603500202.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
44

Gonzalez, A., and A. Micco. "PRIVATE VERSUS PUBLIC ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHILE." Journal of Competition Law and Economics 10, no. 3 (June 27, 2014): 691–709. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nhu002.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
45

Hadfield, G., and E. Talley. "On Public versus Private Provision of Corporate Law." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 22, no. 2 (February 9, 2006): 414–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewj021.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
46

Marlowe, Julia. "Private versus Public Provision of Refuse Removal Service." Urban Affairs Quarterly 20, no. 3 (March 1985): 355–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004208168502000306.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
47

Adams, John C., Sattar A. Mansi, and Takeshi Nishikawa. "Public versus Private Ownership and Fund Manager Turnover." Financial Management 42, no. 1 (December 20, 2012): 127–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-053x.2012.01220.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
48

Fava, Nadia, Manuel Guàrdia, and José Luis Oyón. "Public versus private: Barcelona’s market system, 1868–1975." Planning Perspectives 25, no. 1 (January 2010): 5–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02665430903421718.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
49

Baron, David P., T. Renee Bowen, and Salvatore Nunnari. "Durable coalitions and communication: Public versus private negotiations." Journal of Public Economics 156 (December 2017): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.09.002.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
50

de la Croix, David, and Matthias Doepke. "Public versus private education when differential fertility matters." Journal of Development Economics 73, no. 2 (April 2004): 607–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.05.005.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії