Дисертації з теми "Public reason and religion"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-50 дисертацій для дослідження на тему "Public reason and religion".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте дисертації для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
Ng, Wing Hong. "John Rawls' idea of public reason : religious reason in public justification." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2007. http://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_ra/782.
Повний текст джерелаMartin, Andrew Joseph. "Public values? Public virtues? a critique of John Rawls' idea of public reason /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2005. http://www.tren.com/search.cfm?p068-0575.
Повний текст джерелаO'Connor, Christopher. "Is there a place for religious conviction in public reason?" Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN) Access this title online, 2004. http://www.tren.com.
Повний текст джерелаBespalov, Andrei. "Negotiating religious exemptions: a public reason perspective." Doctoral thesis, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/667498.
Повний текст джерелаEn esta tesis explico tres razones por las cuales las exenciones religiosas de las leyes de aplicación general no son públicamente justificables en una sociedad democrática liberal. Primero, las meras afirmaciones de la forma "Dios lo dice y mi conciencia requiere que obedezco" no explican las razones detrás de las disposiciones legales que se espera que respalden. Por lo tanto, tales reclamos no pueden considerarse incluso como razones justificativas pro tanto de ninguna disposición legal, ya sean leyes o exenciones. En segundo lugar, no importa cuán elaborados sean, las razones basadas en la fe religiosa no pueden admitirse en la justificación pública de las exenciones porque tales motivos implican reclamos no negociables sobre los valores finales, lo que es incompatible con el respeto de los conciudadanos como colegisladores iguales. En tercer lugar, incluso si los argumentos religiosos son permitidos en la justificación pública, dar las exenciones religiosas de las leyes de aplicación general sigue siendo inadmisible, porque cede arbitrariamente la voluntad soberana del pueblo al dictado de las doctrinas religiosas.
Birkett, Edward John. "The tensions of modernity : Descartes, reason and God /." View thesis View thesis, 2000. http://library.uws.edu.au/adt-NUWS/public/adt-NUWS20030411.100355/index.html.
Повний текст джерелаHoyeck, Philippe-Antoine. "Religion and Democracy: Political Inclusion and Normative Renewal in the Work of Jürgen Habermas." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/38967.
Повний текст джерелаVallier, Kevin. "Liberal Politics and Public Faith: A Philosophical Reconciliation." Diss., The University of Arizona, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/201493.
Повний текст джерелаNaser, Samir. "Religion, reason and war : a study in the ideological sources of political intolerance and bellicosity." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2015. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/6153/.
Повний текст джерелаVezzani, Giovanni. "European Muslims and Liberal Citizenship: Reconciliation through Public Reason: The Case of Tariq Ramadan's Citizenship Theory." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2016. https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/228062/4/Thesis.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаDoctorat en Sciences politiques et sociales
N.B. 1) Le lieu de défense de la thèse en cotutelle est ROME (Luiss Guido Carli)2) L'affiliation du co-promoteur de la thèse en cotutelle (Sebastiano Maffettone) est: LUISS Guido Carli
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
Hannam, Patricia M. "What should religious education aim to achieve? : an investigation into the purpose of religious education in the public sphere." Thesis, University of Stirling, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24013.
Повний текст джерелаScott, David Charles. "THE FREE EXERCISE CLAUSE, MINORITY FAITHS, AND THE POSSIBILITY OF RELIGIOUS INDEPENDENCE AFTER RAWLSIAN LIBERALISM." UKnowledge, 2018. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/philosophy_etds/21.
Повний текст джерелаNg, L. S. "Just public reason." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2013. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1401925/.
Повний текст джерелаReilly-Cooper, Rebecca. "Emotions and public reason." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2010. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.698184.
Повний текст джерелаIsherwood, Jack Robert. "Re-thinking public reason." Thesis, Australian Catholic University, 2015. https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/download/125dc735ff6bb740e78f2412d862b1077c89fe0251dbadff751ddc97b712f305/2645036/Re_thinking_Public_Reason_FINAL.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаPitt, Jamaal Boxill Bernard R. "Excluding inclusive public reason." Chapel Hill, N.C. : University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2008. http://dc.lib.unc.edu/u?/etd,1915.
Повний текст джерелаTitle from electronic title page (viewed Dec. 11, 2008). "... in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of Philosophy." Discipline: Philosophy; Department/School: Philosophy.
Jayaram, Athmeya. "Public Reason and Private Bias." Thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2019. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=13422411.
Повний текст джерелаPublic reason theorists argue that it is permissible for the state to enforce political norms, such as laws or constitutional principles, when those norms are acceptable to ?reasonable people.? Reasonable people are neither actual people, with all their flaws, nor are they perfect people; they are rather a partially idealized group ? realistic in some ways and idealized in others. Each of the major public reason theorists ? John Rawls, Gerald Gaus, Jonathan Quong, Joshua Cohen ? idealizes reasonable people to a different degree, but they all share two claims: 1) Reasonable people hold diverse views of the good life. Nevertheless, 2) Reasonable people can all accept basic liberal political norms grounded in freedom and equality. My dissertation begins by arguing that theorists are not free to choose any level of idealization, but are constrained in this choice by the justifications of their theories. In particular, idealization is constrained by one essential part of public reason?s justification, which I call the ?diversity argument.? The diversity argument explains the first element of reasonable people: why do they disagree about the good? The answers, I argue, attributes certain realistic qualities and tendencies to reasonable people, which therefore constrains how much we can idealize them. In chapters on the major public reason theorists, I argue that they all offer a diversity argument that does not match the level of idealization that they employ. As a result, they are unable to show that liberal norms are acceptable to reasonable people, appropriately idealized. In the final chapter, I argue that the mismatch in these theories goes even deeper, which we can see when we ask why we must accommodate disagreement at all. The answers that philosophers have given us ? reasonable disagreement is the inevitable result of human reasoning, human psychology, or free conditions ? also apply to irrational disagreement. Irrational influences such as implicit bias and motivated reasoning are also inevitable results of who we are and how we live, which means we must accommodate these realistic tendencies in political justification. So, if public reason theories must now accommodate disagreement among reasonable-but-sometimes-irrational people, what could be acceptable to all such people? I conclude by suggesting a new direction for public reason theories. People who disagree about the good life, but recognize their common biases, can still justify their views to each other by supporting institutions that mitigate those biases, such as non-discrimination laws and deliberative institutions. This requires a new kind of social contract theory ? one that is grounded in the shared recognition of our limitations, rather than our shared reasons.
Tavares, Inês Ferreira Dias. "Razões religiosas na esfera pública: uma análise teórica e empírica da atuação pentecostal no Poder Legislativo brasileiro." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2012. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=7722.
Повний текст джерелаThe hallmarks of modernity secularism and laicitë have now been called into question by growing religious movements. The boundaries between state and religion are being challenged and redefined. Within this renewal, the question about using or not religious reasons in the public sphere arises. The debate has great importance in Brazil insofar as Pentecostalism, a rapidly expanding branch of Protestantism, has flocking to the tables of the National Congress an unprecedented number of candidates elected because of their religious affiliation. The theoretical and empirical analyzes of the use of religious reasons and of the Pentecostal politics intends to shed light to the issue, using always as a paradigm, limits and guidance, the ultimate foundation of religious freedom: the dignity of the human person.
Schwartzman, Micah Jacob. "Towards a defence of public reason." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.270472.
Повний текст джерелаSenchaudhuri, Esha. "A critique of pure public reason." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2011. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/314/.
Повний текст джерелаMang, Fan Lun Franz. "Beyond public reason liberalism : moderate perfectionism." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2016. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:154eaccf-40fe-439c-b0b7-158e2e79d675.
Повний текст джерелаManning, Colin Ph D. "Issue Individuation in Public Reason Liberalism." Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2021. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu161675417735823.
Повний текст джерелаMurray, Kimberly D. "Signs and Wonders: Reason and Religion in Social Turmoil." Oxford, Ohio : Miami University, 2004. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=miami1082483917.
Повний текст джерелаBeynon, Graham. "Isaac Watts : reason, passion and the revival of religion." Thesis, University of St Andrews, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/3614.
Повний текст джерелаCarmel, Elad. ""When reason is against a man, a man will be against reason" : Hobbes, deism, and politics." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2016. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d0df094a-ba7f-484c-aa30-ca1dca2eeaa7.
Повний текст джерелаMcClinch, Christopher C. "Reason, Imagination, and Universalism in C. S. Lewis." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/10111.
Повний текст джерелаMaster of Arts
El-Tobgui, Carl Sharif. "Reason, revelation & the reconstitution of rationality: Taqī al-Dīn Ibn Taymiyya's (d. 728/1328) «Dar' Ta 'ārud al- 'Aql wa-l-Naql» or "The refutation of the contradiction of reason and revelation"." Thesis, McGill University, 2013. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=116885.
Повний текст джерелаCette thèse se voue à une exploration des grandes lignes du projet d'Ibn Taymiyya dans son chef-d'œuvre en dix volumes et 4 000 pages, le Dar’ ta‘arud} al-‘aql wa-l-naql, ou La réfutation de la contradiction entre la raison et la révélation. Cette œuvre a pour but de résoudre une fois pour toutes le « conflit » entre la raison et la révélation dans l'Islam médiéval tardif au moyen d'une déconstruction et d'une reconstruction systématiques des catégories structurelles du débat. Le prétendu conflit entre la révélation et la raison portait surtout sur l'interprétation de certains des attributs divins jugés irrationnels par les philosophes et les Mu’tazilites, qui y voyaient une assimilation inadmissible de Dieu aux choses créées (tashbih). Cette prise de position culmine dans l'élaboration de la « loi universelle » (qanun kulli) par le théologien ash‘arite Fakhr al-Din al-Razi. Cette « loi » oblige à privilégier les préceptes et les conclusions de la raison en tout cas de conflit entre celle-ci et la révélation coranique, dont les versets s'en retrouvent réduits, par le biais du ta’wil, à une lecture métaphorique. La riposte d'Ibn Taymiyya se révèle exhaustive et globale. Elle a pour effet non seulement de vicier l'intégrité logique de la Loi universelle, mais elle donne lieu également à l'élaboration d'une herméneutique ancrée sur le texte même de la révélation tout en permettant une refonte radicale de l'ontologie des philosophes, surtout de leur théorie réaliste des concepts universels qui avait abouti à une confusion chronique entre ce qui tient à l'existence mentale logique et ce qui relève de la réalité ontologique externe. Cette approche permet à notre auteur de mettre au point une nouvelle épistémologie empirique qui met en valeur trois voies principales d'acquisition de la connaissance, à savoir, le « hiss », ou la perception sensorielle; le « khabar », ou la transmission de récits (surtout en guise de révélation); et le « ‘aql », ou la connaissance rationnelle (autant innée qu'inférentielle). Ces sources de la connaissance sont corroborées à leur tour par le mécanisme du tawatur et sous-tendues par une conception étendue de la fitra. Les divers éléments mis en avant par Ibn Taymiyya en matière de linguistique, d'ontologie et d'épistémologie s'entremêlent pour s'élever à une synthèse permettant d'adhérer à un affirmationisme stricte et rationellement défendable à l'égard des attributs divins tout en évitant le tashbih qui, dans la perspective générale de la tradition ultérieure, devait inévitablement en découler.
Birkett, Edward John, University of Western Sydney, of Arts Education and Social Sciences College, and School of Humanities. "The tensions of modernity : Descartes, reason and God." THESIS_CAESS_HUM_Birkett_E.xml, 2000. http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/399.
Повний текст джерелаDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Cothran, Martin. "Reason and imagination G.K. Chesterton's case for Christianity /." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 1986. http://www.tren.com.
Повний текст джерелаO'Connell, Luke Patrick. "Public reason vs. rhetoric John Rawls and Aristotle /." Online full text .pdf document, available to Fuller patrons only, 2004. http://www.tren.com.
Повний текст джерелаTaylor, Anthony David. "Expressing our fallibility : a conception of public reason." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:7c4b5662-7fa8-4908-a659-5f783c1ff9ad.
Повний текст джерелаAdams, David Richard. "Religion and reason in the thought of Richard Overton, the Leveller." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2003. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/251867.
Повний текст джерелаGreenlee, Patricia Annettee. "Separation of Church and State: A Diffusion of Reason and Religion." Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University, 2006. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2237.
Повний текст джерелаMaclure, Jocelyn. "Disenchantment and democracy : public reason under conditions of pluralism." Thesis, University of Southampton, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.289512.
Повний текст джерелаHughes, Patrick Wallace. "Antidotes to Deism| A reception history of Thomas Paine's "The Age of Reason", 1794--1809." Thesis, University of Pittsburgh, 2013. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3573259.
Повний текст джерелаIn the Anglo-American world of the late 1790s, Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason (published in two parts) was not well received, and his volumes of Deistic theology were characterized as extremely dangerous. Over seventy replies to The Age of Reason appeared in Britain and the United States. It was widely criticized in the periodical literature, and it garnered Paine the reputation as a champion of irreligion.
This dissertation is a study of the rhetoric of refutation, and I focus on the replies to The Age of Reason that were published during Paine's lifetime (d. 1809). I pay particular attention to the ways that the replies characterized both Paine and The Age of Reason, and the strategies that his respondents employed to highlight and counteract its “poison.” To effectively refute The Age of Reason, Paine's respondents had to contend not only with his Deistic arguments, but also with his international reputation, his style of writing, and his intended audience. I argue that much of the driving force behind the controversy over The Age of Reason stems from the concern that it was geared towards the “uneducated masses” or the “lower orders.” Much of the rhetoric of the respondents therefore reflects their preoccupation with Paine's “vulgar” style, his use of ridicule and low-humor, his notoriety, and the perception that The Age of Reason was being read by common people in cheap editions. For Paine's critics, when the masses abandon their Christianity for Deism, bloody anarchy is the inevitable result, as proven by the horrors of the French Revolution.
This dissertation argues that while Paine's respondents were concerned about what he wrote in The Age of Reason, they were more concerned about how he wrote it, for whom he wrote it, and that Paine wrote it. Drawing on Jürgen Habermas's theories of the bourgeois public sphere, I focus on how respondents to The Age of Reason reveal not only their concerns and anxieties over the book, but also what their assumptions about authorial legitimacy and expectations about qualified reading audiences say about late eighteenth century print culture.
Birkett, Edward John. "The tensions of modernity : Descartes, reason and God." Thesis, View thesis View thesis, 2000. http://handle.uws.edu.au:8081/1959.7/399.
Повний текст джерелаWaita, Jonathan Mutinda. "The role of faith and reason in Thomas Aquinas's epistemology." Theological Research Exchange Network (TREN), 2004. http://www.tren.com.
Повний текст джерелаVan, Rooy Paul. "The Challenge of Public Reason: Justified Property Rights and Disability." Thesis, Boston College, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:107978.
Повний текст джерелаWhen is political power legitimate? Public reasons liberals argue that political power is legitimate only when it is supported by reasons drawn from principles of justice that each citizen could endorse. The most well known model for identifying whether a principle satisfies this requirement is John Rawls’ idea of an overlapping consensus. Typical interpretations of the idea of overlapping consensus hold that it expresses a necessary conceptual condition of any reasonable conception of justice. Against this ahistorical view, my analysis shows that Rawls’ mature account of overlapping consensus rests on a particular historicist thesis that liberal institutions are necessary for social cooperation given the presumption of moral and religious pluralism. The authority of public reasoning ultimately rests on a widespread consensus about the necessity of liberal institutions, rather than on a consensus on any particular conception of justice. The limits of public reason, on my analysis, are fixed first and foremost by liberal institutions. Given the prominent historical role of classical liberalism in specifying and defending liberal institutions, one might suppose that classical liberal conceptions of justice would have a central place in any consensus that defines the boundaries of public reasoning. I argue that this appearance is misleading. The work of scholars in disability studies show that conceptions of justice must be sufficiently sensitive to the unique needs and interests of citizens with disabilities. I argue that applying these insights to the idea of public reason shows that classical liberalism can satisfy the requirements of public reason only by unjustly ignoring the perspective of disabled citizens I show that Rawls’ model of public reason rests on a nuanced and historically grounded view of the consensus circumscribing public reason. Further, it shows that a historically conditioned concept of public reason and political legitimacy need not imply a drastic retreat from central egalitarian commitments, despite initial appearances to the contrary
Thesis (PhD) — Boston College, 2018
Submitted to: Boston College. Graduate School of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: Philosophy
McNicholl, Stephen Peter. "Reason, religion, and Plato: Orphism and the mathematical mediation between being and becoming." Thesis, University of Canterbury. Philosophy, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10092/4634.
Повний текст джерелаSutcliffe, Adam David. "Reason, religion, toleration : Judaism and the European early Enlightenment, c. 1665 - c.1730." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.406182.
Повний текст джерелаMallinson, Jeffrey Charles. "Faith, reason, and revelation in Theodore Beza, 1519-1605 /." Oxford : Oxford university press, 2003. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb39936133g.
Повний текст джерелаOtto, Jennifer. "Reason, revelation and ridicule: assessing the criteria for authoritative allegorical interpretations in Philo and Augustine." Thesis, McGill University, 2009. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=67046.
Повний текст джерелаCette thèse examine l'entremêlement des rôles de la raison et de la révélation déterminant l'autorité des exégèses allégoriques de l'Ancien Testament. Abordant l'analyse par la dérision d'Augustin envers l'exégèse de Philo qui interprète le portail de l'Arche du livre Genèse 6 :16 comme un anus humain, cette thèse explore les critères par lesquelles Augustin, lui, revendique que le portail soit interprète comme étant les plaies du Christ. Les deux exégètes comprennent que l'interprétation allégorique est une exercice rationnelle dont l'exégèse se voit déterminée par des principes philosophiques. Philo et Augustin s'entendent toutefois que des vérités allégoriques pertinentes peuvent seulement être discernées par une révélation vécue soit par le lecteur soit un témoin fiable. Le point de divergence se voit dans l'idée de la conceptualisation du salut par la logique ainsi que par comment celui-ci s'interprète au-delà de raison. L'exégèse de Philo, ainsi considéré par Augustin comme représentatif de la praxis de la communauté Juive de l'époque, est traitée de ridicule non pas a cause de sa méthodologie, mais pour son incapacité d'apercevoir la présence rédemptrice du Christ dans le texte de Genèse révélée de par l'Incarnation.
Fillion, Christine Marguerite. "The role of scriptural testimony, reason and spiritual practice in Upadésasahasri : a non-commentarial work of ´Sa?nkara." Thesis, McGill University, 2003. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=19765.
Повний текст джерелаPerez, Celestino. "Juergen Habermas and Pope John Paul II on faith, reason, and politics in the modern world." [Bloomington, Ind.] : Indiana University, 2008. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3319921.
Повний текст джерелаTitle from PDF t.p. (viewed on May 11, 2009). Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 69-08, Section: A, page: 3302. Adviser: Jeffrey C. Isaac.
Bone, Amra. "Knowledge : the Qur'anic discourse concerning reason and revelation and its impact." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2016. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/6785/.
Повний текст джерелаQuong, Jonathan. "Deliberation and diversity : an essay on public reason and identity politics." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402153.
Повний текст джерелаBadano, G. "Deliberative democracy, public reason and the allocation of clinical care resources." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2014. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1453168/.
Повний текст джерелаLeung, Cheuk-Hang. "Educating for deliberative citizenship : public reason, political morality and civic action." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2013. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10020740/.
Повний текст джерелаBrigham, Stephen. "Limitations of reason and liberation of absurdity reason and absurdity as means of personal and social change: case study: psychotherapy /." Access electronically, 2005. http://www.library.uow.edu.au/adt-NWU/public/adt-NWU20060320.161119/index.html.
Повний текст джерелаMohammadi, Doostdar Alireza. "Fantasies of Reason: Science, Superstition, and the Supernatural in Iran." Thesis, Harvard University, 2012. http://dissertations.umi.com/gsas.harvard:10215.
Повний текст джерелаGerber, Chad Tyler. "Virtue epistemology in redemptive historical perspective a short conversation between philosophy and theology regarding the nature of knowledge /." Online full text .pdf document, available to Fuller patrons only, 2001. http://www.tren.com.
Повний текст джерела