Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Plant Systematics and Taxonomy / Статті в журналах

Статті в журналах з теми "Plant Systematics and Taxonomy"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Plant Systematics and Taxonomy.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 10 грудня 2022

Оновлено: 28 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Plant Systematics and Taxonomy".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Small, Ernest. "SYSTEMATICS OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMATICS (OR, TAXONOMY OF TAXONOMY)." TAXON 38, no. 3 (August 1989): 335–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1222265.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Das, Partha, and Bhupendra Kholia. "A selective study of online resources of information on Plant Taxonomy & Systematics: a new path of data flow to the users in the digital age." Indian Journal of Forestry 37, no. 4 (December 1, 2014): 445–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.54207/bsmps1000-2014-r5msa0.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The paper describes the importance of plant taxonomy and classifies the various plant taxonomic databases. It tries to focus on some selective important online public domain databases of plant taxonomy and systematics which are becoming a new path of data flow to the plant taxonomists, botanists and researchers on biodiversity all over the world.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Klazenga, Niels. "Generic concepts in Australian mosses." Australian Systematic Botany 18, no. 1 (2005): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/sb04014.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The impact of changes in generic concepts as a result of changes in philosophy and methodology associated with phylogenetic systematics on the taxonomy of Australian mosses is discussed. It is concluded that, while phylogenetic systematics has already had a significant impact on the taxonomy of Australian mosses, many taxonomic changes that have occurred in recent years are the result of an enormous taxonomic backlog that is being gradually eliminated. The relative impact of phylogenetic systematics is expected to increase in coming years.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Jeffrey, C., V. H. Heywood, and D. M. Moore. "Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy." Kew Bulletin 40, no. 4 (1985): 871. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4109880.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Hegnauer, R. "Comparative phytochemistry and plant taxonomy." Giornale botanico italiano 120, no. 1-6 (January 1986): 15–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11263508609428018.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Keener, Carl S., V. H. Heywood, and D. M. Moore. "Current Concept in Plant Taxonomy." Bryologist 89, no. 1 (1986): 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3243085.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Schilling, Edward E., V. H. Heywood, and D. M. Moore. "Current Concepts in Plant Taxonomy." Systematic Botany 10, no. 4 (October 1985): 505. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2419146.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Cronquist, Arthur, and Tod F. Stuessy. "Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data." Brittonia 42, no. 4 (October 1990): 256. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2806812.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Stevens, P. F., and T. F. Stuessy. "Plant Taxonomy. The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data." Kew Bulletin 46, no. 3 (1991): 590. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4110562.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Keener, Carl S., and Tod F. Stuessy. "Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data." Systematic Botany 16, no. 2 (April 1991): 396. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2419289.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Smith, Gideon F., and Estrela Figueiredo. "Capacity building in taxonomy and systematics." TAXON 58, no. 3 (August 2009): 697–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tax.583001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Barneby, Rupert C., Peter Hadland Davis, Ian Charleson Hedge, Kit Tan, R. R. Mill, and T. S. Elias. "Plant Taxonomy, Phytogeography and Related Subjects." Brittonia 42, no. 2 (April 1990): 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2807633.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Stuessy, Tod F., and V. V. Sivarajan. "Introduction to Principles of Plant Taxonomy." Systematic Botany 12, no. 1 (January 1987): 182. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2419231.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Boatwright, J. S., F. Forest, and J. C. Manning. "Systematics of Trachyandra (Asphodelaceae, Asphodeloideae): Taxonomy, phylogeny and evolution." South African Journal of Botany 115 (March 2018): 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.02.020.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Lagomarsino, Laura P., and Laura A. Frost. "The Central Role of Taxonomy in the Study of Neotropical Biodiversity." Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 105, no. 3 (September 30, 2020): 405–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.3417/2020601.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The Neotropics are the most species-rich area of the planet. Understanding the origin and maintenance of this diversity is an important goal of ecology and evolutionary biology. Success in this endeavor relies heavily on the past work of taxonomists who have collected specimens and produced the floras and monographs that constitute the foundation for the study of plant diversity. To illustrate this, we visualize collecting efforts through time and identify the importance of past taxonomic and collection efforts in generating the bulk of specimen data that broad-scale analyses rely on today. To demonstrate the importance of taxonomy for the study of Neotropical biodiversity, we showcase selected plant groups in which in-depth taxonomic understanding has facilitated exciting evolutionary and ecological research and highlight the teams of scientists who have built on the legacy of Alwyn Gentry, one of the most prolific taxonomists of the late 20th century. We also discuss challenges faced by taxonomists, including perceived subjectivity, difficulty in measuring impact, and the need to become more interdisciplinary. We end with potential solutions going forward, including integration of taxonomists in interdisciplinary research, advocacy for continued collection efforts, increased funding for alpha taxonomic research that is performed with increasingly replicable methodology, and explicit decolonization efforts to increase inclusivity and equity in the field of taxonomy. Acknowledging the central role of taxonomy and taxonomists is essential to accurately and completely describe Neotropical biodiversity patterns in an age of unprecedented extinction risk and conservation need.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Small, Ernest. "The economic value of plant systematics in Canadian agriculture." Canadian Journal of Botany 71, no. 12 (December 1, 1993): 1537–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b93-188.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Agriculture is like a house, resting on a foundation of biological systematics. That foundation is seriously deteriorating, in part because of lack of appreciation of its vital roles and economic relevance. Support for biological sciences is concentrating in seemingly lucrative disciplines, without much realization that the financial benefits often can not be realized without the materials and information provided by systematics. A variety of considerations supports the economic wisdom of investing in systematics research in Canada, most particularly on behalf of the agricultural sector, and suggest that failure to do so could lead to serious, even catastrophic, consequences. In particular, the present scarcity of expertise for identification of vanishing invaluable wild crop germ plasm may permanently penalize both agriculture and society. While it is essential that systematists retain their fundamental orientation to the clarification and cataloging of biological diversity, emphasis on the useful roles played and products produced is both an economic necessity and a social responsibility. Key words: plant, systematics, taxonomy, agriculture, economic.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Figueiredo, Estrela, Vasco Silva, António Coutinho, and Gideon F. Smith. "Twentieth century vascular plant taxonomy in Portugal." Willdenowia 48, no. 2 (August 2018): 303–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.3372/wi.48.48209.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Ma, Jinshuang, and Wan-Chun Cheng Zheng, Wan-Jun. "An Indispensable Work in Chinese Plant Taxonomy." Taxon 54, no. 1 (February 1, 2005): 262. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25065343.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Carro, Lorena, and Imen Nouioui. "Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era." AIMS Microbiology 3, no. 3 (2017): 383–412. http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.383.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Rapini, Alessandro. "Taxonomy "under construction": advances in the systematics of Apocynaceae, with emphasis on the Brazilian Asclepiadoideae." Rodriguésia 63, no. 1 (March 2012): 075–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s2175-78602012000100007.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The Apocynaceae comprise approximately 5,000 species and are widely distributed. The family belongs to the Gentianales and can be easily recognized by the presence of latex and a style-head derived from the fusion of two carpels at the apex of the styles. The largest subfamily in Apocynaceae is Asclepiadoideae. Treated as the Asclepiadaceae for almost two centuries, it comprises about 3,000 species and is defined by stamens with bisporangiate anthers and pollen transferred in specialized units called pollinaria. Since the 19th century, floristic studies and taxonomic monographs have significantly contributed to the taxonomy of Brazilian Asclepiadoideae. Nevertheless, advances in understanding the internal relationships in the subfamily were not done until this millennium, with the popularization of phylogenetic studies based on molecular data and powerful computer analyses. Advances in the systematics of Apocynaceae have provided new interpretations on the morphological evolution and biogeography of the family and have led to important changes in its classification. Nevertheless, several taxonomic rearrangements are still needed and it can be said that the taxonomy of Apocynaceae is "under construction". In this article, the major taxonomic changes in the family are reviewed, with special attention given to the systematics of Neotropical groups. A cladogram of the Apocynaceae is presented, which highlights the phylogenetic position of the Brazilian genera and their diversity in number of native species. The main studies and the diversity of Asclepiadoideae in Brazil are summarized and perspectives for future research on the subfamily are presented.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Durkin, Louisa, Tobias Jansson, Marisol Sanchez, Maryia Khomich, Martin Ryberg, Erik Kristiansson, and R. Henrik Nilsson. "When mycologists describe new species, not all relevant information is provided (clearly enough)." MycoKeys 72 (September 10, 2020): 109–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.72.56691.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Taxonomic mycology struggles with what seems to be a perpetual shortage of resources. Logically, fungal taxonomists should therefore leverage every opportunity to highlight and visualize the importance of taxonomic work, the usefulness of taxonomic data far beyond taxonomy, and the integrative and collaborative nature of modern taxonomy at large. Is mycology really doing that, though? In this study, we went through ten years’ worth (2009–2018) of species descriptions of extant fungal taxa – 1,097 studies describing at most ten new species – in five major mycological journals plus one plant journal. We estimated the frequency at which a range of key words, illustrations, and concepts related to ecology, geography, taxonomy, molecular data, and data availability were provided with the descriptions. We also considered a range of science-demographical aspects such as gender bias and the rejuvenation of taxonomy and taxonomists as well as public availability of the results. Our results show that the target audience of fungal species descriptions appears to be other fungal taxonomists, because many aspects of the new species were presented only implicitly, if at all. Although many of the parameters we estimated show a gradual, and in some cases marked, change for the better over time, they still paint a somewhat bleak picture of mycological taxonomy as a male-dominated field where the wants and needs of an extended target audience are often not understood or even considered. This study hopes to leave a mark on the way fungal species are described by putting the focus on ways in which fungal taxonomy can better anticipate the end users of species descriptions – be they mycologists, other researchers, the public at large, or even algorithms. In the end, fungal taxonomy, too, is likely to benefit from such measures.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Lock, J. M., and John O. Kokwaro. "Flowering Plant Families of East Africa. An Introduction to Plant Taxonomy." Kew Bulletin 50, no. 3 (1995): 668. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4110352.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Williams, David M. "Plant Taxonomy: The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data, 2nd edition." Systematic Biology 59, no. 5 (April 8, 2010): 608–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq017.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Swann, Eric C., and John W. Taylor. "Phylogenetic perspectives on basidiomycete systematics: evidence from the 18S rRNA gene." Canadian Journal of Botany 73, S1 (December 31, 1995): 862–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/b95-332.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Basidiomycete systematics has a history of dramatic change with the introduction of new forms of information. We present a new class level taxonomy for basidiomycetes consisting of the Urediniomycetes emend., Ustilaginomycetes, and Hymenomycetes. The primary source of characters for this analysis is the 18S rRNA gene. Other characters such as cellular carbohydrate composition, major ubiquinone system, 5S rRNA sequence, basidium morphology, and septum and spindle pole body ultrastructure are considered. Comparison of the new class system to other basidiomycete taxonomies is made. Use of 18S sequence to test the monophyly of an order is made in an examination of the Filobasidiales. Key words: basidiomycetes, molecular systematics, taxonomy, Filobasidiales, basidiomycetous yeasts.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Austin, Daniel F., and Tod F. Stuessy. "Plant Taxonomy. The Systematic Evaluation of Comparative Data." Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 118, no. 2 (April 1991): 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2996872.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Herendeen, Patrick S. "International Association for Plant Taxonomy 2021 Stebbins Medal." TAXON 70, no. 3 (June 2021): 691. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tax.12525.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

JURY, STEPHEN L. "Some recent computer-based developments in plant taxonomy." Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 106, no. 2 (June 1991): 121–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1991.tb02287.x.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Gibbs, A., A. Ding, J. Howe, P. Keese, A. MacKenzie, M. Skotnicki, P. Srifah, and M. Torronen. "Old versus new characters for systematics: Cautionary tales from virology." Australian Systematic Botany 3, no. 1 (1990): 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/sb9900159.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Molecular sequence information about viruses has mostly confirmed the groupings devised by traditional taxonomic methods, but shown in addition that the genes of related species may differ in number, arrangement, orientation and in sequence homology. It has also revealed that true genetic recombination between viruses has been common, even among those with RNA genomes, indeed most virus groups seem to have arisen y recombination. Thus, there is an unexpected wealth of genetic chaos hidden behind the fatade of the phenotype, and it is possible that the difficulties that plant taxonomists have had in identifying the relationships of the major groupings of plants could have similar causes. Nonetheless, molecular taxonomy does give sensible results and this is illustrated by a classification of the large subunit Rubisco proteins of 21 plant species based on their amino acid sequences.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

JIAO, BO-HAN, LI-LI LU, CHEN CHEN, MENG WEI, JIA-HAO SHEN, YUAN YUAN, YU-FEI WANG, and TIAN-GANG GAO. "Evaluating the taxonomy of macrofossils used in macroevolution: a case study of Artemisia (Asteraceae)." Phytotaxa 572, no. 1 (November 8, 2022): 107–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.572.1.8.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Fossils recorded information of the past phenotype and geographic distribution directly. Incorporating fossils information into phylogenies of living taxa would deepen our understanding of their macroevolution. Accurate taxonomy of these fossils is the first step before employing them. However, the taxonomy of some fossils has not been evaluated carefully. Here we take Artemisia as an example. We investigated the morphology of all the available Artemisia macrofossils based on the latest phylogeny and evaluated their taxonomic identities by comparing them with extant representative species. Our result showed that the taxonomic identities of these macrofossils are doubted. They would better not be treated as members of Artemisia for subsequent phylogenetic or biogeographic studies. This study improves our knowledge of the morphology of Artemisia, highlights the importance of careful morphological comparisons between fossils and living taxa, and reveals that attention should be given to the uncertainty of the fossil taxonomy.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Thiele, K. R., P. H. Weston, and A. R. Mast. "Paraphyly, modern systematics and the transfer of Dryandra into Banksia (Proteaceae): a response to George." Australian Systematic Botany 28, no. 3 (2015): 194. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/sb15015.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The transfer of all species of Dryandra into Banksia in 2007, resulting from phylogenetic studies demonstrating that the latter is paraphyletic with respect to the former, generated controversy in some sections of the community. In a recent paper, Alex George, a taxonomist of long standing and monographer of both genera, criticised the transfer, and its subsequent acceptance by the Australian herbarium and plant systematics community. More broadly, George criticised the direction of modern taxonomy, particularly its basis in phylogenetic analysis and monophyly. His criticisms reflect adherence to a largely pre-Darwinian taxonomic tradition, methodology, practice and conceptual framework. This framework, developed in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, and later operationalised as the phenetic method, has for most taxonomists been superseded by the phylogenetic framework for taxonomy developed by and following Willi Hennig. The criticism of the Dryandra transfer by George and colleagues on one hand, and its acceptance by the majority of practicing systematists on the other, is thus an example of competition between differing paradigms rather than George’s claimed specific shortcomings of the transfer or the analyses on which it was based.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Rossman, Amy Y., and Mary E. Palm-Hernández. "Systematics of Plant Pathogenic Fungi: Why It Matters." Plant Disease 92, no. 10 (October 2008): 1376–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/pdis-92-10-1376.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Systematics is the study of biological diversity; it is the science that discovers, describes, and classifies all organisms and includes taxonomy, nomenclature, and phylogeny. Scientific names accurately define a set of organisms and are used to communicate about them. As systematic scientists learn more about species, scientific names change to reflect this increased knowledge. Accurately named and precisely defined species reflect what is known about their biology, host range, and geographic distribution. Online resources are available to help users determine the accepted scientific name of fungal plant pathogens. Recent advances in the systematics of fungi are discussed, including the knowledge that: (i) true Fungi are more closely related to animals than to plants; and (ii) the Oomycetes are not true Fungi; rather they are closely related to the yellow-brown algae, known as stramenopiles or Kingdom Chromista. Using molecular data, the higher level classification of true Fungi is more precisely defined, as are fungal genera and species. In addition, the asexually reproducing fungi that constitute a majority of plant-associated fungi are being integrated into the phylogeny of the Ascomycota. The importance of documenting research on plant pathogens by depositing cultures in culture collections and voucher specimens in herbaria is emphasized.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Tancoigne, Elise, and Guillaume Ollivier. "Evaluating the progress and needs of taxonomy since the Convention on Biological Diversity: going beyond the rate of species description." Australian Systematic Botany 30, no. 4 (2017): 326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/sb16017.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

There is a long tradition of assessing the activity and progress of taxonomy with quantitative indicators, such as, for example, number of taxonomists, species described and species collected. These evaluations play a key role in the context of a worldwide concern over biodiversity and its governance. We have described and analysed these evaluations since 1992, the year in which the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was adopted. We showed that despite the establishment of a dedicated body inside the CBD (the Global Taxonomy Initiative), these quantitative evaluations are mostly sporadic and independent initiatives, performed by non-taxonomists. They do not map the places where most of the taxonomic activities take place, and they are performed on small scales, with scarce and heterogeneous sources of data, making comparisons almost impossible. Most of the indicators they use refer to the activity of species description. We argue that there is a need to rethink the way we evaluate taxonomy today and we discuss why it is urgent to move beyond indicators of species description. We suggest the use of a new set of indicators that would focus on taxonomic resources and dynamics, instead of taxonomic outputs.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Tian, Yongjing, Jingbo Zhou, Yunyan Zhang, Shuang Wang, Ying Wang, Hong Liu, and Zhongsheng Wang. "Research Progress in Plant Molecular Systematics of Lauraceae." Biology 10, no. 5 (May 1, 2021): 391. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10050391.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Lauraceae is a large family of woody plants with high ecological and economic value. The tribal and generic division and phylogenetic relationship of Lauraceae have long been controversial. Based on morphological and molecular evidence, phylogenetic relationships within the Cinnamomeae, Laureae and Perseeae tribes, also called ‘the Core Lauraceae’, have arisen particular attention. In this review, we comprehensively collated the literatures on the phylogeny of Lauraceae published in recent years and summarized progress made in molecular systematic researches employing gene fragments, chloroplast genomes and DNA barcodings analyses. We clarified the phylogenetic relationships and main controversies of ‘the Core Lauraceae’, the systemic position of fuzzy genera (Neocinnamomum, Caryodaphnopsis and Cassytha) and the development of chloroplast genome and DNA barcodes. We further suggested and proposed the whole genome analysis and different inflorescence types would be possible to provide more information for further research on phylogenetic relationships and taxonomy of Lauraceae.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Vink, Wim. "TAXONOMY IN WINTERACEAE." TAXON 37, no. 3 (August 1988): 691–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1221108.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Podani, János. "Taxonomy versus evolution." TAXON 58, no. 4 (November 2009): 1049–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tax.584001.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Brummitt, R. K. "Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics." TAXON 46, no. 4 (November 1997): 723–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1224478.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Banks, Hannah, Félix Forest, and Gwilym Lewis. "Palynological contribution to the systematics and taxonomy of Bauhinia s.l. (Leguminosae: Cercideae)." South African Journal of Botany 89 (November 2013): 219–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2013.07.028.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Hoste, Ivan, and Filip Verloove. "Taxonomy of the weed species of the genus Echinochloa (Poaceae, Paniceae) in Southwestern Europe: Exploring the confused current state of affairs." PhytoKeys 197 (May 23, 2022): 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.197.79499.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The taxonomy of Echinochloa, a predominantly tropical to warm-temperate genus of 40–50 species, including some of the world’s worst weeds, is still poorly understood. This is because some species, including the extremely widespread E. crus-galli, show a wide range of morphological, physiological and ecological variation, in part the result of a complex recent evolutionary history. Furthermore, there is often a dearth of clear distinguishing features among species. The same applies to the species established in Southwestern Europe, where unintentionally introduced populations have now established themselves as important weeds of crops, especially maize and rice. Taxonomic and nomenclatural confusion hampers progress in weed science. In this study, we give an identification key that covers the weedy taxa encountered in Southwestern Europe, followed by notes on taxonomy and nomenclature. Moreover, a lectotype is designated for Echinochloa frumentacea. It is argued that current confusion cannot be overcome without including populations of Eastern Asian origin in taxonomic studies and without the joint efforts of experts in the fields of weed science, morphology-based taxonomy, genomics and phylogenetics.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Zingone, A. "Phytoplankton Evolution, Taxonomy and Ecology." Journal of Plankton Research 31, no. 1 (September 22, 2008): 119–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbn106.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Gillham, Malcolm C. "Polymorphism, taxonomy and host plant associations inAlebraleafhoppers (Homoptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae)." Journal of Natural History 25, no. 1 (February 1991): 233–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222939100770141.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Baldini, Riccardo Maria. "The impact of Covid-19 crisis on Plant Taxonomy: will we be able to approach to plant taxonomy as in the past?" Webbia 75, no. 1 (July 1, 2020): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/jopt-9205.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Crisci, Jorge V. "Making Taxonomy Visible." Systematic Botany 31, no. 2 (April 1, 2006): 439–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1600/036364406777585829.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Ornduff, Robert, A. J. Richards, J. Kirschner, J. Stepanek, and K. Marhold. "Apomixis and Taxonomy." Systematic Botany 22, no. 4 (October 1997): 727. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2419439.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Schlauer, Jan. "Carnivorous plant systematics." Carnivorous Plant Newsletter 39, no. 1 (March 1, 2010): 8–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.55360/cpn391.js609.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

As can be expected in an ecologically defined group of organisms, carnivorous plants (unlike orchids or cacti) do not constitute one single natural taxonomic unit marked by common descent and close interrelationship. On the contrary, several lines (derived from four different orders of flowering plants) have given rise to carnivorous families or genera (see Figure 1). The classification of at least some carnivorous families is not settled yet, so a somewhat extended discussion of different lines of evidence shall be presented here.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Schatz, George E. "Etelka Leadlay and Stephen Jury (editors), Taxonomy and Plant Conservation." Systematic Biology 56, no. 3 (June 1, 2007): 540. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10635150701468295.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

LIMA, LUCAS VIEIRA, RAQUEL STAUFFER VIVEROS, and ALEXANDRE SALINO. "Typification of a Linnaean name in Gleicheniaceae (Polypodiopsida)." Phytotaxa 351, no. 2 (June 1, 2018): 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.351.2.9.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Gleicheniaceae are an ancient fern family with about 157 species and six genera (PPG I 2016). Although its taxonomy has been through several changes in the last years (Gonzales & Kessler 2011), a great gap remains in both taxonomy and nomenclature. For the Neotropics, there are several national or regional taxonomic treatments of the family (e.g. Proctor 1985, Lellinger 1989, Tryon & Stolze 1989, Moran 1995, Mickel & Smith 2004, Kessler & Smith 2018) and a revision of the Neotropical members of the genus Sticherus Presl (1836: 51) (Gonzales & Kessler 2011), but only few of them are dedicated to solve nomenclatural issues.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Karlin, Eric F. "Taxonomy of Hawaiian Sphagna." Bryologist 104, no. 2 (June 2001): 290–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2001)104[0290:tohs]2.0.co;2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Ahmadjian, Vernon, P. Albertano, J. R. Gallon, M. Grilli Caiola, and L. Hoffmann. "Cyanobacteria. Morphology, Taxonomy, Ecology." Bryologist 102, no. 1 (1999): 161. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3244490.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Crum, Howard. "Traditional Make-Do Taxonomy." Bryologist 88, no. 3 (1985): 221. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3243032.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Holmes, Walter C., Kwok Leung Yip, and Ann E. Rushing. "Taxonomy of Koeberlinia (Koeberliniaceae)." Brittonia 60, no. 2 (June 28, 2008): 171–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12228-008-9026-z.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!