Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Partnership.
Статті в журналах з теми "Partnership"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Partnership".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
1
Weiss, Elisa S., Rebecca Miller Anderson, and Roz D. Lasker. "Making the Most of Collaboration: Exploring the Relationship Between Partnership Synergy and Partnership Functioning." Health Education & Behavior 29, no. 6 (December 2002): 683–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109019802237938.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Considering the challenges inherent to collaboration and the time it takes to achieve measurable outcomes, partnerships need a way to determine, at an early stage, whether they are making the most of collaboration. The authors have developed a new measure, partnership synergy, which assesses the degree to which a partnership’s collaborative process successfully combines its participants’ perspectives, knowledge, and skills. This article reports the results of a national study designed to examine the relationship between partnership synergy and six dimensions of partnership functioning: leadership, administration and management, partnership efficiency, nonfinancial resources, partner involvement challenges, and community-related challenges. Data were collected from 815 informants in 63 partnerships. Results of regression analysis conducted with partnership-level data indicated that partnership synergy was most closely related to leadership effectiveness and partnership efficiency. Implications of these findings for research and practice are discussed.
2
Smith, Susan, Kimiya Akhyani, Dan Axson, Andre Arnautu, and Ilina Stanimirova. "The partnership co-creation process: Conditions for success?" International Journal for Students as Partners 5, no. 2 (November 17, 2021): 48–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4772.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Staff-student partnership activity continues to increase across the higher education sector, expanding to encompass a broad range of initiatives. Numerous frameworks and typologies have been proposed to help organise the literature and facilitate comparisons among different types of partnerships. The research reported here draws on a case study of a quality-enhancement staff-student partnership to identify the stages of the partnership co-creation process. It argues that the establishment of partnership values is intertwined with the stages of the co-creation process and is critical to the partnership’s success. This research contributes to practice and the literature by offering a practical approach to managing a staff-student partnership, adding to work on quality enhancement partnerships, and extending prior work evaluating partnership activity from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders.
3
Monroe, Andrea. "Making Tax Law Work: Improvisation and Forgotten Taxpayers in Partnership Tax." University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, no. 55.3 (2022): 549. http://dx.doi.org/10.36646/mjlr.55.3.making.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
There is a growing awareness that federal tax law caters to a small number of wealthy and well-advised taxpayers without regard for the rest of the taxpaying public, and partnership tax is a prime example. This Article explains how complexity and indeterminacy have transformed partnership tax, harming millions of forgotten taxpayers who struggle to comply with their annual filing obligations. A root cause of this phenomenon is the professional culture among elite practitioners, policymakers, and scholars at the heart of the partnership tax system. The most troublesome provisions of partnership tax are also its most fundamental—namely the allocation rules that regulate how partners share a partnership’s taxable items. Complexity is a universal problem faced by partnerships at all levels of wealth, status, and sophistication, and the vast majority of taxpayers respond with improvisational tax compliance. Indeed, in remarkably diverse contexts, improvisation has replaced technical compliance as the norm in partnership allocations. Wealthy partnerships make a strategic choice to improvise, using “target allocations,” while poorer partnerships improvise because they have no other choice, routinely following “intuitive” tax law and hoping for the best. Reframing this complexity problem as a shared experience of all partnerships exposes the technical and cultural fractures of partnership tax in a new and different light. First, the technical rules governing partnership allocations do not work as designed for any category of partnership. A second, less explored fracture is the professional culture of partnership tax, which takes for granted the technical sophistication of substantive tax law without appreciating the distributional consequences of sustained complexity and improvisation. Partnership allocations require more than technical solutions. One necessary step is addressing the professional culture of partnership tax to rethink what it means for tax law to work. This Article proposes that partnership reforms developed by experts and directed at wealthy and well-advised partnerships should be accompanied by reforms addressing parallel problems faced by forgotten partnerships. The solutions will necessarily differ, but a bilateral focus on the universal problems of all partnerships would represent meaningful progress, signaling a commitment to a fair, principled, and representative system of partnership tax.
4
Brinkerhoff, Derick W., and Jennifer M. Brinkerhoff. "Partnerships Between International Donors and Non-Governmental Development Organizations: Opportunities and Constraints." International Review of Administrative Sciences 70, no. 2 (June 2004): 253–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020852304044254.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article examines partnerships between international donors and non-governmental development organizations (NGDOs). Following a discussion of partnership’s rationale and presumed benefits, the article provides a general overview of selected donors’ partnership experience and describes four illustrations of donor– NGDO partnership. Opportunities and constraints are identified, illustrating gaps in oratory and practice. Identified challenges include constraints related to donorinitiated partnerships, addressing the legacy of past relationships, the insufficiency of relying on personal relationships, and the limits of good intentions. The article stresses the importance of recognizing the political and economic realities that frame donor–NGDO relationships and condition incentives on both sides of the partnership.
5
Angelini, Antonella. "A Trouble Shared is a Trouble Halved." International Organizations Law Review 13, no. 1 (September 3, 2016): 171–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15723747-01301009.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The World Bank has a large partnership portfolio, including international organizations and private actors. Due to their diversity and to the ambitious programs they pursue, partners are highly exposed to financial and operational risk. Curbing this risk takes different shapes in the legal design of partnerships. In particular, partnerships differ in terms of the degree of legal continuity along the stages of decision-making, management of funds and program implementation. This configuration raises several problems for the attribution of international legal responsibility for partnership-related activities. In some cases, the problem is one of attribution of conduct at the level of the partnership’s governing body as well as at that of implementation. More broadly, the policy of risk management leads to a dilution of control within the partnership chain. This means that one can construe only certain partnership programmes, or certain segments of a partnership, as amassing enough control for responsibility to arise.
6
Yu, Tsu-Wei, and Yung-Ming Shiu. "Partnership between life insurers and their intermediaries." Management Research Review 37, no. 4 (March 11, 2014): 385–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/mrr-11-2012-0243.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose – The purpose of this study attempts to fill the gap in the literature by investigating partnerships between life insurers and insurance intermediaries, the effects of these partnerships, and the parties' willingness to cooperate. Design/methodology/approach – Data were collected in a survey of general managers of the insurance intermediaries in Taiwan and were analysed using in-depth interviews and questionnaires. A structural equation modelling approach is employed to test the hypotheses. Findings – The paper finds that partnership components, communication strategies, conflict resolution approaches, and market orientation are related to partnership performance. The paper also finds that willingness to continue cooperation increases with partnership performance. The results have implications for managers of life insurers and their intermediaries. Originality/value – This research is one of the first studies to conceptualize and empirically examine the partnerships of life insurers and insurance intermediaries. Theoretically, a specification of the linkages between characteristics of the partnership, communication strategies, conflict resolution approaches, the market orientation of the partners, the partnership's performance and both parties' willingness to continue cooperation can provide a useful framework for future research. Practically, this study offers insights into how to proactively manage partnerships in order to improve partnership performance, willingness to continue cooperation and avoid the damaging costs inherent in failure.
7
Chandanabhumma, P. Paul, Adena Gabrysiak, Barbara L. Brush, Chris M. Coombe, Eugenia Eng, Megan Jensen, Laurie Lachance, Peggy Shepard, Nina B. Wallerstein, and Barbara A. Israel. "Cultivating an Ecosystem: A Qualitative Exploration of Sustainability in Long-Standing Community-Based Participatory Research Partnerships." Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 17, no. 3 (September 2023): 393–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907970.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract: Background: While sustainability is crucial to the success of community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships, there is a lack of conceptual clarity on what defines sustainability and what characterizes sustainability-promoting practices in long-standing (in existence 6 years or longer) CBPR partnerships. Objectives: The aim of this article is to explore the definition of sustainability, as well as practices that influence sustainability from the perspectives of academic and community experts in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Methods: This qualitative analysis is part of Measurement Approaches to Partnership Success, a participatory mixed methods validity study that examined "success" and its contributing factors in long-standing CBPR partnerships. Thematic analysis of 21 semistructured interviews was conducted, including 10 academic and 11 community experts of long-standing CBPR partnerships. Results: The key defining components of sustainability we identified include: distinguishing between sustaining the work of the partnership and ongoing relationships among partners; working towards a common goal over time; and enduring changes that impact the partnership. We further identified strengthening and capacity building practices at multiple levels of the partnership that served to promote the sustainability of the partnership's work and of ongoing relationships among partners. Conclusions: Sustainability can be understood as supporting an ecosystem that surrounds the beneficial relationships between academic and community partners. Ongoing evaluation and application of practices that promote the sustainability of partnership activities and relationships may strengthen the long-term effectiveness of CBPR partnerships in advancing health equity.
8
Weiss, Elisa S., Shahnaz K. Taber, Erica S. Breslau, Sarah E. Lillie, and Yuelin Li. "The Role of Leadership and Management in Six Southern Public Health Partnerships: A Study of Member Involvement and Satisfaction." Health Education & Behavior 37, no. 5 (October 2010): 737–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198110364613.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Research has led to greater understanding of what is needed to create and sustain well-functioning public health partnerships. However, a partnership’s ability to foster an environment that encourages broad member involvement in discussions, decision making, and activities has received scant empirical attention. This study examined the relationship between partnership members’ perceptions of how well leadership and management facilitated their involvement, and their satisfaction with their role and influence within the partnership. Data came from 60 individuals who participated in two waves of a quantitative process evaluation of six southern interorganizational partnerships, formed as part of a national pilot project to increase cervical and breast cancer screening rates. Results suggested that environments fostering broad partner involvement were associated with measures of member satisfaction, controlling for other partnership characteristics. Findings indicated that facilitation of member involvement deserves increased consideration from researchers and practitioners as an indicator of the quality of partnership functioning.
9
Supini, Rizqi Hidayat, Bayu Mahendra, and Ayu Sitanini. "ANALYSIS OF THE TILAPIA PARTNERSHIP PATTERN BETWEEN UPTD BIAT KUTASARI AND THE ASTANA MINA MANDIRI FISHERIES ASSOCIATION AND ITS INFLUENCE ON INCREASING THE INCOME OF FISH FARMER IN PURBALINGGA REGENCY." Perwira International Journal of Economics & Business 4, no. 1 (July 10, 2024): 51–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.54199/pijeb.v4i1.401.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This research aims to determine the pattern of tilapia partnerships between UPTD BIAT Kutasari and the Astana Mina Mandiri Fisheries Association and its influence on increasing the income of tilapia farmers in Purbalingga Regeancy. Using a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach (mix method) with purposive sampling. In this research there were 15 respondents, namely tilapia farmers who joined the partnership. The data analysis used is descriptive analysis and paired sample test. The research results showed that the partnership pattern implemented was a general trade partnership pattern, there was an increase in tilapia farmer’s income from IDR. 7,106,533,33 to IDR. 9,655,000, increasing revenue by 36% from before the partnership. The result of the difference test on farmers’ income have a significance level of 0.000 and the t count is 5.140. It can be cloncluded that there is a significant difference between farmers’ income before and after the partnership, so that the partnersip has an impact on the income of tilapia farmers.
10
Moskwa, Leopold. "Commercial law in Poland: Partnerships." Pravovedenie 65, no. 1 (2021): 76–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu25.2021.105.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Commercial law has lost its status as a branch of law separate from civil law and currently forms only a specialised part of it. The key criterion for distinguishing commercial law is the entrepreneur in the sense that commercial law is “the private law of entrepreneurs”. Due to their key importance on the market, commercial law companies occupy a special place among entrepreneurs and therefore there are attempts to make these forms of business activity as attractive as possible. The same applies to partnerships. Therefore, the following legislative efforts should be noted. Owing to the introduction of the Commercial Companies Code in 2001, partnerships gained legal capacity, but were not equipped with legal personality, and continued to be considered “imperfect” legal persons. Consequently, although they may acquire rights and incur liabilities, unlike legal persons, they are tax “transparent”, which means that they are not subject to income tax. The adoption of the principle of subsidiary liability of partners for the obligations of a partnership has become an important step and it strengthens the position of partners. This means that the creditor of a partnership may only conduct enforcement from the partners’ assets when the enforcement against the partnership’s assets proves ineffective. As a result, as long as the claims of the partnership’s creditors can be satisfied from the partnership’s assets, the partners are not in danger of being held liable for the partnership’s obligations. The introduction of two new types of partnerships into the Polish legal system, namely the professional partnership and a limited joint-stock partnership is of great importance. The former is intended only for professionals and regulates the liability of a partner for the company’s obligations in a very favourable manner. The partner is liable in a limited manner, i. e., solely for malpractice committed by himself or by persons under his supervision. In turn, a limited joint-stock partnership was introduced to protect entrepreneurs (general partners in spe) who intend to recapitalise on the enterprise which usually has an established position on the market, by issuing shares, without exposing themselves to the danger of the so-called hostile takeover.
11
Rosanti, Novi, Nia Okta Sari, and Teguh Endaryanto. "THE IMPACT OF BROILER FARMING BUSINESS PARTNERSHIP ON PRODUCTION COST AND INCOME IN METRO CITY." Journal of Integrated Agribusiness 4, no. 1 (May 30, 2022): 32–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.33019/jia.v4i1.2873.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Partnership pattern was the pattern of managing broiler chicken business through cooperation with companies that offered many benefits so that most breeders were encouraged to established partnership patterns. But in the implementation of partnerships not always run in accordance with the agreement because there were some frauds committed by farmers and companies. The risk of frauds made some farmers chose to manage the broiler breed chicken business independently. The difference in implementation between partnership patterns and self-sustaining patterns can have a performance impact on broiler chicken breeders. This study aims to analyze the partnership patterns, analyze the partnership's driving factors and analyze the impact of partnerships on the production and income costs of broiler breed chicken farmers in Metro City. This study was conducted from October 12 to November 30, 2020 located in Metro City. The methods were used in this research were qualitative and quantitative combined methods. The data was collected through a survey by interviewing directly 59 respondents. The result of this research were The pattern of partnerships of broiler breed chicken farmers in Metro City was the plasma core pattern, 2) The driving factors of partnership in broiler chicken breeders were capital availability motivation, market guarantee motivation, price guarantee motivation and high income motivation, 3) Statistically the partnership pattern had an impact on income and labor allocation. The company could improve the services that were felt by farmer tobe lacking, such as the accuracy of providing production facillities and payment of harverts and could provide competitive sell prices to breeders partner.
12
Carrico, Catherine, Irene Lujan, Trena Anastasia, and Christine McKibbin. "EVALUATING THE WYOMING GWEP PARTNERSHIP." Innovation in Aging 6, Supplement_1 (November 1, 2022): 223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igac059.886.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract The goal of the Wyoming Geriatrics Workforce Enhancement Program (WyGWEP) is to utilize partnerships to improve health outcomes for older adults by developing a healthcare workforce trained to address unmet health and social determinant needs of Wyoming’s older residents. The purpose of this presentation is to report results from the novel mixed-methods evaluation of the WyGWEP partnership. Data were gathered from WyGWEP stakeholders through the Partnership’s Self-Assessment Tool (n=17; Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health, 2002), which assesses domains of Synergy, Leadership, Resource Sharing — Non-financial and Financial, Benefits and Drawbacks, Decision Making, and Administration/Management and Satisfaction. Semi-structured interviews (n=12) with partnership participants provided additional information and context. Evaluation results indicate that WyGWEP partners are highly satisfied across all domains of the Partnership’s Self-Assessment Tool. WyGWEP partners from Eastern Shoshone Tribal Health will share what has contributed to a successful collaborative. Additional results related to how this type of partnership has influenced participants’ ability to complete objectives and activities will be reviewed.
13
Mashchenko, Maryna, Evgen Shapran, and Oleksiy Petrukhnov. "PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AS A CATALYST FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP DEVELOPMENT: MUTUALLY BENEFICIAL COOPERATION FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH." Ukrainian Journal of Applied Economics and Technology 8, no. 2 (March 20, 2023): 45–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.36887/2415-8453-2023-2-6.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Public-private partnership (PPP) is considered one of the effective instruments for collaboration between the government and the private sector in stimulating economic development. PPP can catalyze entrepreneurial growth, foster a favorable business environment, and accelerate infrastructure and socio-economic projects. This research aims to develop theoretical and methodological approaches to ensure public-private entrepreneurial development partnerships. Public-private partnership (PPP) is recognized as a driving force for entrepreneurial development, as it opens new prospects and opportunities for creating a favorable business environment. Ukraine's public-private partnership's entrepreneurial development principles have been formulated. The objectives and tasks of the program for the development of public-private partnerships for entrepreneurial development have been systematized, including goals and studies aimed at supporting and stimulating entrepreneurship through public-private partnerships: creating a favorable investment climate; supporting small and medium enterprises; fostering innovative entrepreneurship; expanding export potential; promoting sectoral collaboration. The main directions for establishing public-private partnerships in Ukraine for entrepreneurial development have been proposed. The following methodological approach is suggested to ensure a successful public-private partnership for entrepreneurial development, which includes the following stages: analysis of needs and goals, development of a strategy for public-private partnership for entrepreneurial development, improvement of the legislative framework, the establishment of communication mechanisms, financial support, creation of a favorable regulatory environment, support for education and training, monitoring and evaluation of joint PPP projects. This methodological approach will help create a conducive platform for public-private partnerships and contribute to entrepreneurial development. Research on the principles, methods, and directions for implementing public-private partnership mechanisms has allowed the construction of an organizational and economic model for its functioning with the aim of entrepreneurial development, enabling effective coordination among enterprises, market institutions, and government bodies for joint entrepreneurial development and the achievement of positive socio-economic results. Recommendations have been developed to ensure public-private partnerships for entrepreneurial development, which will contribute to economic growth. Keywords: public-private partnership, entrepreneurship, socio-economic development, business.
14
Naher, Shabnam, Jen Nickelson, Kayla P. Patel, Armandeep Singh, and Heidi Darbo. "Building a Student Organization–Voluntary Health Agency Partnership—and Maintaining It During the COVID-19 Pandemic." Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship 15, no. 2 (February 13, 2023): 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.54656/jces.v15i2.503.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
New and enhanced partnerships are crucial for harnessing resources and exchanging knowledge, particularly for university student groups with limited resources and networking opportunities. The objective of this paper is to address the value of a student-community partnership and illustrate factors that have contributed to the partnership’s success, using a framework developed by the Gallup Corporation that describes characteristics of strong relationships. This paper further addresses the specific challenges posted by the COVID-19 pandemic within this student-community partnership. Using this process helped to explain why the partnership was successful and highlighted opportunities for continued relationship building. The lessons learned from this experience will strengthen and enhance future community-engagement initiatives.
15
Ostrowdun, Christopher, Rayna Friendly, Kelly Matthews, Alise De Bie, and Frits Roelofs. "Holding space and engaging with difference: Navigating the personal theories we carry into our pedagogical partnership practices." International Journal for Students as Partners 4, no. 1 (April 9, 2020): 82–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v4i1.4093.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Partnerships between students and faculty are increasingly established within higher education. Everyone’s unique life story or background influences how they understand partnership praxis. Acknowledging individual understandings of student-faculty partnership matters because personal stories can influence how such partnerships form, function, and evolve. We, as students and faculty, share our individual theories of partnership to illuminate differing ways people can make sense of partnership as praxis. Using a reflective, autoethnographic research approach, we unpack two interdependent threads from our narratives: (a) holding space for how personal histories shape the experience of partnership and (b) engaging the messiness of partnership. To understand and nurture inclusive practices, we contend, means engaging the unique standpoints and social positions that both students and faculty bring into partnerships. Instead of attempting to collapse and converge different perspectives of partnership, we take pause to consider how these differences can enrich partnerships and be honoured throughout a partnership
16
Loban, Ekaterina, Catherine Scott, Virginia Lewis, Susan Law, and Jeannie Haggerty. "Activating Partnership Assets to Produce Synergy in Primary Health Care: A Mixed Methods Study." Healthcare 9, no. 8 (August 18, 2021): 1060. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9081060.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Partnerships are an important mechanism to tackle complex problems that extend beyond traditional organizational divides. Partnerships are widely endorsed, but there is a need to strengthen the evidence base relating to claims of their effectiveness. This article presents findings from a mixed methods study conducted with the aim of understanding partnership processes and how various partnership factors contribute to partnership effectiveness. The study involved five multi-stakeholder partnerships in Canada and Australia working towards improving accessibility to primary health care for vulnerable populations. Qualitative data were collected through the observation of 14 partnership meetings and individual semi-structured interviews (n = 16) and informed the adaptation of an existing Partnership Self-Assessment Tool. The instrument was administered to five partnerships (n = 54). The results highlight partnership complexity and the dynamic and contingent nature of partnership processes. Synergistic action among multiple stakeholders was achieved through enabling processes at the interpersonal, operational and system levels. Synergy was associated with partnership leadership, administration and management, decision-making, the ability of partnerships to optimize the involvement of partners and the sufficiency of non-financial resources. The Partnership Synergy framework was useful in assessing the intermediate outcomes of ongoing partnerships when it was too early to assess the achievement of long-term intended outcomes.
17
Loban, Ekaterina, Cathie Scott, Virginia Lewis, and Jeannie Haggerty. "Measuring partnership synergy and functioning: Multi-stakeholder collaboration in primary health care." PLOS ONE 16, no. 5 (May 28, 2021): e0252299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252299.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In primary health care, multi-stakeholder partnerships between clinicians, policy makers, academic representatives and other stakeholders to improve service delivery are becoming more common. Literature on processes and approaches that enhance partnership effectiveness is growing. However, evidence on the performance of the measures of partnership functioning and the achievement of desired outcomes is still limited, due to the field’s definitional ambiguity and the challenges inherent in measuring complex and evolving collaborative processes. Reliable measures are needed for external or self-assessment of partnership functioning, as intermediate steps in the achievement of desired outcomes. We adapted the Partnership Self-Assessment Tool (PSAT) and distributed it to multiple stakeholders within five partnerships in Canada and Australia. The instrument contained a number of partnership functioning sub-scales. New sub-scales were developed for the domains of communication and external environment. Partnership synergy was assessed using modified Partnership Synergy Processes and Partnership Synergy Outcomes sub-scales, and a combined Partnership Synergy scale. Ranking by partnership scores was compared with independent ranks based on a qualitative evaluation of the partnerships’ development. 55 (90%) questionnaires were returned. Our results indicate that the instrument was capable of discriminating between different levels of dimensions of partnership functioning and partnership synergy even in a limited sample. The sub-scales were sufficiently reliable to have the capacity to discriminate between individuals, and between partnerships. There was negligible difference in the correlations between different partnership functioning dimensions and Partnership Synergy sub-scales. The Communication and External Environment sub-scales did not perform well metrically. The adapted partnership assessment tool is suitable for assessing the achievement of partnership synergy and specific indicators of partnership functioning. Further development of Communication and External Environment sub-scales is warranted. The instrument could be applied to assess internal partnership performance on key indicators across settings, in order to determine if the collaborative process is working well.
18
Peters, Michael A., and Tina Besley. "Collaborative Partnerships in Education: Social Innovation and the Co-Creation of Public Knowledge Goods." Beijing International Review of Education 4, no. 2 (June 9, 2022): 191–209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/25902539-04020002.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract This article reviews collaborative partnerships in the field of education investigating four different models of partnership: (1) The School-Community Partnership Model; (2.) The Public-Private Partnership Model (ppp); (3) Transnational Strategic Collaborative Partnerships; and, (4) The Model of Partnership as Collaboration and Social Innovation in the new digital economy.
19
Sunderland, Naomi, Debra Domalewski, Elizabeth Kendall, and Kylie Armstrong. "Which comes first: the partnership or the tool? Reflections on the effective use of partnership tools in local health partnerships." Australian Journal of Primary Health 15, no. 4 (2009): 303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/py09014.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper focuses on the use of a partnership self-evaluation tool in local health partnerships in Australia. Partnership tools are intended to be used across all phases of partnership development and are typically delivered in the form of a self-administered survey. Survey questions are designed to encourage members of local partnerships to reflect on their progress to date and, if necessary, to reorient future activities to satisfy objectives and desired outcomes. In this paper we argue that without a broader surrounding framework of partnership development and appropriate assistance in administering partnership tools, the potential benefits of self evaluation in local partnerships may be restricted. We base these comments on a study of the use of a partnership self-evaluation tool as part of a broader chronic disease initiative in 17 communities across regional Australia during 2008. Although participants reported favourable outcomes from being involved in the local partnerships, and some found the tool to be of benefit, only 8 of the 17 partnerships actually used the self-evaluation tool. The reported reasons for non-use related primarily to: (1) lack of time; (2) perceptions that it was too early to ‘evaluate’ the partnership; and (3) difficulty in administering the tool. These barriers to use indicate that participants may have been unaware of the potential of the tool to assist in partnership development over time. Partnership participants may require more preparation to use partnership tools in a way that can secure high quality sustainable local health partnerships.
20
Raftery, Philomena, Mazeda Hossain, and Jennifer Palmer. "A conceptual framework for analysing partnership and synergy in a global health alliance: case of the UK Public Health Rapid Support Team." Health Policy and Planning 37, no. 3 (December 17, 2021): 322–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab150.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract Partnerships have become increasingly important in addressing complex global health challenges, a reality exemplified by the COVID-19 pandemic and previous infectious disease epidemics. Partnerships offer opportunities to create synergistic outcomes by capitalizing on complimentary skills, knowledge and resources. Despite the importance of understanding partnership functioning, research on collaboration is sparse and fragmented, with few conceptual frameworks applied to evaluate real-life partnerships in global health. In this study, we aimed to adapt and apply the Bergan Model of Collaborative Functioning (BMCF) to analyse partnership functioning in the UK Public Health Rapid Support Team (UK-PHRST), a government–academic partnership, dedicated to outbreak response and research in low- and middle-income countries. We conducted a literature review identifying important elements to adapt the framework, followed by a qualitative case study to characterize how each element, and the dynamics between them, influenced functioning in the UK-PHRST, exploring emerging themes to further refine the framework. Elements of the BMCF that our study reinforced as important included the partnership’s mission, partner resources (skills, expertise and networks), leadership, the external environment, management systems and communication. Additional elements identified in the literature and critical to partnership functioning of the UK-PHRST included governance and financial structures adopted, trust and power balance, organizational culture, strategy and evaluation and knowledge management. Because of the way the UK-PHRST was structured, fostering team cohesion was an important indicator of synergy, alongside collaborative advantage. Dividing the funding and governance equally between organizations was considered crucial for maintaining institutional balance; however, diverse organizational cultures, weak communication practices and perceived power imbalances compromised team cohesion. Our analysis allowed us to make recommendations to improve partnership functioning at a critical time in the evolution of the UK-PHRST. The analysis approach and framework presented here can be used to evaluate and strengthen the management of global health partnerships to realize synergy.
21
Jones, Jacky, and Margaret M. Barry. "Factors influencing trust and mistrust in health promotion partnerships." Global Health Promotion 25, no. 2 (July 27, 2016): 16–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1757975916656364.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Partnerships between sectors can achieve better outcomes than can be achieved by individual partners working alone. Trust is necessary for partnerships to function effectively. Mistrust makes partnership working difficult, if not impossible. There has been little research into partnership functioning factors that influence trust and mistrust. This study aimed to identify these factors in health promotion partnerships. Data were collected from 337 partners in 40 health promotion partnerships using a postal survey. The questionnaire incorporated multi-dimensional scales designed to assess the contribution of factors that influence partnership trust and mistrust. Newly validated scales were developed for trust, mistrust and power. Multiple regression analysis was used to identify the significance of each factor to partnership trust and mistrust. Power was found to be the only predictor of partnership trust. Power, leadership, and efficiency were the most important factors influencing partnership mistrust. Power in partnerships must be shared or partners will not trust each other. Power-sharing and trust-building mechanisms need to be built into partnerships from the beginning and sustained throughout the collaborative process.
22
Ungras, Oshish, and Gavin Brockett. "In partnership, for partnership." International Journal for Students as Partners 8, no. 1 (May 13, 2024): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v8i1.5571.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
After almost a year of planning an international conference on student partnership for humanitarian action with the UN Refugee Agency, a student-faculty partnership reflect on the learning process they undertook, and how years of working together built a strong foundation for this project. Working in partnership to communicate the importance of partnership to address complex global issues signifies the importance of engaging multi-level stakeholders in new, innovative solutions. This introduction to the special section titled after the conference provides the context for this challenging yet rewarding feat made possible with a community of partnerships.
23
Herab, Ahmed, Ahmad Al-Ghamdi, Khodran Alzahrani, Khalid M. Elhindi, Muhammad Muddassir, and Hazem S. Kassem. "A Framework for Quantifying the Strength of Partnerships between Agricultural Cooperatives and Development Actors: A Case Study in Saudi Arabia." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 1 (December 26, 2022): 364. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20010364.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The issue of the agricultural cooperatives’ sustainability in developing their businesses is gaining increasing prominence. Building partnerships between development actors and agricultural cooperatives has been considered an effective strategy for supporting financial capital and addressing sustainability issues collectively. Therefore, this study aimed to address the features and strengths of 33 partnerships established between the Beekeeping Cooperative Association in Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia, and other actors between 2016 and 2021. The analysis of the collaborations was based on six criteria: motivations, partnership planning, outputs, governance practices, outcomes, and sustainability of a partnership. Furthermore, we developed a weighted scoring model to control variable selection and submit the strength of each partnership. The findings indicated that most collaborations (45.5%) were signed with the private sector. Furthermore, the honey value chain development was the most frequent reason (69.7%) attracting the partners to engage in the partnerships. Some of the most critical environmental objectives targeted by the partnerships examined were enhancing bee habitat by the diversification of pasture species, management to increase the flowering period, and proper grazing management. All partners achieved their individual goals jointly in 54.5% of the partnerships analyzed. In terms of a partnership’s strength, the findings also revealed that only three partnerships (9.1%) were characterized as strong partnerships. This study provides a better understanding of how agricultural cooperatives collaborate with other actors and a basis for assessing the strength of the partnerships. Such information is crucial for developing relevant policies to encourage cooperatives to engage in future sustainability partnerships.
24
S.O., Nischymna, Zlyvko S.V/ та Sykal M.M. "Consumer partnerships as organizational and legal form of a juridical entityэ". Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law 2020, № 2 (18 грудня 2020): 28–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2020.02.028.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The status of a consumer partnership as one of organizational and legal forms of juridical entities, that is also one of organizational and legal forms of citizens’ more active participation in state-management and their personal needs satisfaction is determined in the article. The norms of the Civil Code and the State Code of Ukraine, the Law of Ukraine “On Cooperation” and the “On Consumer Cooperation” are analyzed. According to the mentioned documents an independent, democratic citizens’ organization who unite in order to conduct common management for the sake of improving their economic and social status on the basis of voluntary partnership and mutual support are considered to be a consumer partnership. The above mentioned regulatory legal acts provide for different features of consumer partnerships. The features of consumer partnerships provided by current legislation are not civil and legal in their nature. Such a situation has become a legacy of the fact that the principles of legal regulation of the system of consumer partnerships, formed in the USSR, has not almost been changed yet. The very fact is that there is a need to develop a new legal model of consumer partnerships, which structure will take into account modern tendencies of the development of European legislation. It’s possible to formulate a list of civil and legal features of consumer cooperative partnerships that will distinguish them among any other partnerships. Namely they are: non-entrepreneurial legal status of consumer partnership; sufficiency of the main rights of the members of a partnership; subjects of property right of the members of a partnership; responsibility of the members of a partnership for obligations of a consumer partnership. All these features allow us to distinguish consumer partnerships as a separate organizational and legal form of non-entrepreneurial partnerships. The following definition of a consumer cooperative partnership can be proposed: it is a non-entrepreneurial cooperative partnership which members have a right for a concern. The size of this concern is determined as a set of unit and additional contributions. The members are liable within the value of the unit and are entitled to profit within the limits determined by law. Key words: cooperative, consumer partnership, features of consumer partnerships.
25
Smith, Susan, Kimiya Akhyani, Dan Axson, Andre Arnautu, and Ilina Stanimirova. "Learning together: A case study of a partnership to co-create assessment criteria." International Journal for Students as Partners 5, no. 2 (November 17, 2021): 123–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v5i2.4647.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This case study outlines a staff-student partnership to co-create generic assessment criteria to use in a UK business school. It highlights the potential for staff-student partnerships to create a temporary subfield, in which the established power differentials of academia are dissolved and partnership values can be established. We draw on a series of 10 semi-structured interviews with partnership participants. The values that underpin partnerships are linked to three major phases of the partnership process: establishing the partnership, partnership operation and atmosphere, and the partnership outcomes. The findings indicate that the values of authenticity, reciprocity, and inclusion are critical antecedents to establishing a successful partnership and that careful attention should be paid to establishing the partnership. The case extends our understanding of the partnership process by emphasising these antecedents. The study is multi-authored, which reflects an extension to the partnership process described in the case study.
26
YUE, SHENGSONG. "Towards a Global Partnership Network: Implications, Evolution and Prospects of China's Partnership Diplomacy." Copenhagen Journal of Asian Studies 36, no. 2 (February 15, 2019): 5–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.22439/cjas.v36i2.5647.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In the past 25 years, partnership diplomacy has gradually become an indispensable component in China's grand diplomacy strategy. Between 1993 and the end of 2017, China established more than 100 partnerships with the outside world. To better understand the evolution of China's strategy for diplomacy we need to know how these partnerships are formed and what motivates China to foster its partnership network. Although the importance of this strategy has been identified, the current literature does not yet include significant study of China's partnership network. This article attempts to fill this gap by assessing existing literature on partnership and government documents, interpreting the diversified labels and grades of partnerships, and analysing the network's evolution. It also attempts to estimate possible challenges facing China in the future expansion of its global partnership network. It argues that, although China intends to further extend its global influence and explore potential benefits through its partnerships, because of the challenges ahead its partnership network is still an aspiration rather than a realistic blueprint.
27
Mayan, Maria, Sanchia Lo, Merin Oleschuk, Anna Paucholo, and Daley Laing. "Leadership in Community-Based Participatory Research: Individual to Collective." Engaged Scholar Journal: Community-Engaged Research, Teaching, and Learning 2, no. 2 (June 23, 2017): 11–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.15402/esj.v2i2.162.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Multi-sector collaborative partnerships hold much promise in tackling seemingly intractable and complex social issues. However, they often encounter many challenges in achieving their goals. Leadership can play an important role in reducing the impact of factors that threaten a multi-sector partnership’s success. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) partnerships are collaborative and, in many cases, multi-sectored. While there is a developing literature and practice on multi-sector, collaborative partnerships, leadership in CBPR is relatively unexplored, especially at various partnership stages (i.e., formation, implementation, maintenance, and accomplishment of goal). Through the method of focused ethnography, we explored the research question “How is leadership exercised during the formation stage of a CBPR partnership?” Eighteen partners (government, community, and university sectors) were interviewed about the leadership during the formation stage of their partnership, and data were qualitatively content-analyzed. Partners explained that leadership was exercised during the formation stage through (1) individual characteristics, (2) actions, and (3) as a collective. Our findings illustrate that CBPR leadership shares many of the characteristics of traditional leadership and adapts them to support the collaborative process of CBPR, leading to a collective form of leadership. These findings have implications for the study and practice of CBPR leadership.
28
Grant, Carl. "A Partnership for Creating Successful Partnerships." Information Technology and Libraries 29, no. 1 (March 1, 2010): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.6017/ital.v29i1.3151.
Повний текст джерела
29
Chittle, Laura, Paige Coyne, Aliyah King, Siddhartha Sood, Chris Houser, and Dora Cavallo-Medved. "But do they agree? Examining differences in science faculty and student perceptions’ of the presence of student partnership values." International Journal for Students as Partners 7, no. 2 (October 16, 2023): 28–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v7i2.5269.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
There is growing support for the use of student-faculty partnerships within higher education. Successful partnerships, capable of sustainable transformation, require the presence of several underlying values held by both faculty and students. The purpose of this study was to examine differences in the perceptions of student-faculty partnership values across science faculty, graduate and undergraduate students, and determine whether these values differ by partnership category. Faculty and students responded to the Student Staff Partnership Questionnaire which included five scales aimed to assess values for successful student partnerships: reciprocal respect, influence, autonomy, commitment, and partnership. Our findings suggest that faculty perceive themselves as aligning with the values of reciprocal respect, influence, autonomy, and partnership to a higher degree than undergraduate and graduate students perceive faculty as adhering to them. No differences in values were noted across partnership categories. Implications for higher education are discussed.
30
Drakaki, Maria, and Panagiotis Tzionas. "Community-based social partnerships in crisis resilience: a case example in Greece." Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal 26, no. 2 (April 3, 2017): 203–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/dpm-09-2016-0190.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to describe in-depth a community-based social partnership, emerged in response to the financial crisis in Greece, with members from the private, public and civic sectors, using a case example of a grass-root self-organised national network. Design/methodology/approach Formal and informal interviews as well as written communication with members of the partnership mainly formed the basis for the analysis. Topics covered formation and implementation activities, outcomes, relationship issues, such as trust and links to social capital. Findings A shared community risk and a national media campaign to increase public awareness of the issue were catalysts for individuals’ sensitisation and participation in the partnership. The shared risk was the loss of community’s social cohesion, through poverty aggravated by the financial crisis. Self-organisation led to innovative relationships, whereas trust, collective action and collaboration show social capital attributes in the partnership enabling resilience development. Research limitations/implications The research contributes in the fields of community-based partnerships and engagement in building community and crisis resilience. The findings are based on a case example. More evidence is needed in order to derive generalised statements about the partnership’s contribution to crisis resilience. Practical implications The partnership has shown impact on community engagement, health and well-being. Originality/value This paper presents a partnership type for building community and crisis resilience with the case example of one such partnership in Greece, formed to alleviate community distress caused by the crisis.
31
Koppert-van Beek, Monique. "The New Dutch Partnership Act." European Company Law 4, Issue 6 (December 1, 2007): 265–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2007063.
Повний текст джерела
32
McDONALD, IAN. "Theorising Partnerships: Governance, Communicative Action and Sport Policy." Journal of Social Policy 34, no. 4 (October 2005): 579–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0047279405009165.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Under New Labour, partnerships have emerged to become a central mechanism of service delivery in social policy. In response to this development, a number of papers and texts have appeared that have questioned the claims made for the benefits of partnerships by politicians and policy makers. In particular, the gap between the rhetoric of inclusiveness and the practice of exclusion in partnership working has been highlighted. However, as pertinent as these insights are, it is argued here that extant research into partnerships in social policy remains theoretically undeveloped, characterised by one-sided approaches that either lack critical edge or are dismissive of the potential of partnership working. What is required is an approach that addresses the deeper contradictions of partnerships in social policy and the structuring relations of power underpinning the conceptions of partnerships. Drawing on key concepts in social and political theory, this article proposes a theoretical framework that focuses on the dynamic and contextual nature of partnership. In short, a differentiated theory of partnership is offered as a means of facilitating a more realistic understanding of the limits and possibilities of partnership working. A case study on partnerships in sport policy is used to illustrate the analysis.
33
A., Goloborodko. "APPROACHES TO DEFINING THE ESSENCE OF DIGITAL STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP." Scientific Bulletin of Kherson State University. Series Economic Sciences, no. 44 (December 20, 2021): 36–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.32999/ksu2307-8030/2021-44-6.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In modern conditions of a transformational economy, the processes of forming partnerships are especially relevant, based on the construction of the concept of digital strategic partnership, which opens up new competitive opportunities in the search for rational behavior of economic microsystems. The article identifies three main stages of globalization and the place of digitalization of all processes of social life. The studied features of the development of digital strategic partnerships made it possible to highlight the prerequisites for creating digital strategic partnerships and the main factors influencing their development: economic, political, social, technical and cultural factors. The controversy of scientific views on the definition of the essence of the concept of "stra-tegic partnership" is considered, two main approaches to the definition of the essence of the concept of "strategic partnership" are highlighted – according to the goals of creation and levels of economic relations. According to the goal of creating strategic partnerships, it identifies such classification features as: partnership as an agreement, partnership as a model of competition, partnership as a relational model, partnership as an international alliance of enterprises. According to the levels of economic de-velopment, strategic partnerships are distinguished at the macro level, at the meso level and at the micro level. The author pres-ents the definition of the term "Digital Strategic Partnership" as a set of parties (enterprises) to achieve a certain strategic goal, in particular to increase efficiency, which implies the creation of a common system of values and processes based on the use of resources. and partner competencies based on a single digital platform for business organizations. The basic concepts that reveal the essence of digital strategic partnership are revealed – cooperation, agreement, interaction, integration, partnership, strategy. In the new digital economy, digital strategic partnerships enable businesses to gain new competency benefits by gaining a single, open information network of access to partner resources, including markets, technology, capital, and human resources.Keywords: globalization, partnership, strategic partnership, digital strategic partnership. У статті визначено три основні етапи глобалізації і місце цифровізації всіх процесів суспільного життя. Сформовано передумови створення цифрових стратегічних партнерств і чинники впливу на їх розвиток. Розглянуто полеміку наукових поглядів щодо визначення сутності поняття «стратегічне партнерство», виділено підходи до визначення сутності поняття «стратегічне партнерство» за метою створення партнерства: як угода, як конкурентна модель, як реляційна модель, як міжнародний альянс підприємств і за рівнями економічного розвитку: на макрорівні, мезорівні і мікрорівні. Представлено визначення терміна «цифрове стратегічне партнерство» та основні поняття, що розкривають суть цифрового стратегічного партнерства.Ключові слова: глобалізація, партнерство, стратегічне партнерство, цифрове стратегічне партнерство
34
Astuti, Linda Tri Wira, Diana Sofia Huitron Flores, Iman Arman, Herawati Herawati, and Yenny Laura Butarbutar. "The impact of farmer partnerships on arabica coffee farming in Simalungun Regency, North Sumatra Province, Indonesia." AGRIEKONOMIKA 11, no. 2 (October 31, 2022): 115–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v11i2.14810.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Coffee is one of Indonesia's main economic activities for foreign exchange. An increase in exports of 8.11%, and a decline in imports of 58% in 2019, opened up export opportunities and large domestic markets. The government has implemented efforts to improve coffee farmers' welfare, one of which is agricultural business partnerships that can solve smallholder problems in developing countries and expand subsistence or traditional agriculture to high production value and export-oriented. This research aimed to analyze (1) the factors influencing coffee farmers' participation in agricultural partnerships and (2) the impact of the agricultural partnership on coffee farmers' performance in Simalungun Regency, North Sumatra Province. The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) technique analyzed the partnership's influence on coffee farming and agricultural income, productivity, and prices. The results showed that number of dependents household members and land area influence farmers' partnership participation. Participation increases coffee farming and agricultural income, productivity, and prices.
35
Crockett, Jamelyn, Patrick Haydell, Lauren Hynson, Kristen Joseph, Marybeth Lima, Tejasri Sunchu, and Shane Vallery. "Beyond the Deliverable." International Journal for Service Learning in Engineering, Humanitarian Engineering and Social Entrepreneurship 17, no. 2 (November 22, 2022): 33–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.24908/ijsle.v17i2.15687.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Those who participate in service-learning/civic engagement (SLCE) in engineering have a common practice of reflecting on partnerships to determine if they were successful and how they might be improved. But what makes a partnership successful? We wanted to learn more about how and why to quantify partnership success to think “beyond the deliverable,” which is often the singular focus of engineering SLCE projects. To this end, we created a rubric for three dimensions of partnership that we selected after consulting engagement partnership literature: transactional, cooperative, and transformational. Using this rubric, we assessed the 55 completed partnerships of the LSU Community Playground Project (LSUCPP) by plotting scores in a 3-axis coordinate system (transactional as the x-axis, cooperative as the y-axis, and transformational as the z-axis) where a placement closer to (3.0, 3.0, 3.0) means a more universally successful partnership. Within each dimension of partnership, we assessed design, people, and process in equal measure to ensure that we paid adequate attention to each of these key aspects of engineering SLCE efforts. Further, part of this assessment involved surveying constituents (community partners, students, and faculty) about the transformational dimension of completed partnerships. Results showed that our partnerships had high transactional (2.4) and cooperative (2.5) mean scores overall, with a lower transformational mean (1.8). We also identified a transactional/cooperative threshold (2.0/2.0) at which the chance of having a transformational partnership went up; overall, our percentage of highly (2.0 or higher) transformational partnerships was 58%, but 70% of our partnerships that reached the threshold were highly transformational. The aspects of transformation most often identified by our survey respondents included building your capacity personally (81%), building lasting connections with colleagues (73%), and building your capacity professionally (70%). We believe that the method of holistic assessment for community-university partnerships presented here can lead to better engaged partnerships and can be adapted by others who wish to improve their SLCE engineering partnerships.
36
Mores, Lovely S., Jeongwoo Lee, and Woongkyoo Bae. "University-Community Partnerships: A Local Planning Co-Production Study on Calabarzon, Philippines." Sustainability 11, no. 7 (March 27, 2019): 1850. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11071850.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
University-community partnerships provide opportunities for collaborations and meaningful engagement with community partners, in order to promote sustainable community development. To date, studies on university-community partnerships have largely neglected partnership potential and readiness prior to partnership formation. These factors enable expectations and targets to be negotiated and potential problems to be anticipated, prior to any formal collaboration. Hence, this study investigates the optimal preconditions—including environment, resources, and motivation—to facilitate successful university-community collaboration for local urban planning. Specifically, a sample of local government units (LGUs) and universities in the Calabarzon region of the Philippines were interviewed and observed to determine their needs and access to planning resources at universities, as well as factors that would ensure sustained partnerships. The results show that there is a need for university-community partnerships in local planning, since LGUs have limited technical capacity in preparing comprehensive land use plans, particularly with respect to data analysis, technical writing, project development, and hazard mapping. Conversely, LGUs have more financial resources than universities. Local universities were determined to be uniquely suited to meet the technical and human resource needs of LGUs. Importantly, though, previous partnership experience was found to dramatically influence both parties’ decisions regarding whether or not to pursue a partnership. Accordingly, there is a need to temper the desires and expectations of partner organizations, and lay down the foundations of sustainable university-community partnership prior to partnership formation. Toward this end, policies that bolster partnership institutionalization, funding, and systematic monitoring and evaluation systems can enhance the utility of such partnerships moving forward.
37
Park, Jaehong, Kumju Hwang, and Sang-Joon Kim. "Forming a Social Partnership between a Small Social Enterprise and a Large Corporation: A Case of the Joint Platform, H-JUMP." Sustainability 10, no. 10 (October 10, 2018): 3612. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10103612.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This study illustrates how partnerships in asymmetric power relationships, such as social enterprises and large established firms, can be made in the context of social partnership. We acknowledge that partnerships with large corporations can help social enterprises to overcome several structural barriers they may encounter in forming and sustaining their business models. However, these partnerships can be situated in asymmetric power relationships as resource dependence unfolds. Thus, paradoxically, a partnership with a large corporation can be another challenge to the social enterprise. In absorbing these constraints, we propose that a social enterprise should come up with a stylized social partnership model, utilizing their social capital when engaging in the formation of such a power-imbalanced partnership. We conducted an in-depth case study which presents how a small and young social enterprise can achieve a viable partnership with a large, established firm. Our findings show that social enterprises can form and develop long-term sustainable partnerships with large corporations using a stylized platform strategy with social capital and relational governance in the process of collective value creation.
38
Cho, Meehee, Mark A. Bonn, Su Jin Han, and Sora Kang. "Partnership strength and diversity with suppliers." International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management 30, no. 3 (March 19, 2018): 1526–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-01-2017-0016.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this study is to better understand the effects of independent restaurant partnerships upon product innovation associated with performance by investigating differences in business situations between startup and established independent restaurant sectors. Design/methodology/approach Partnership strength and diversity were assessed to identify their influence on restaurant product innovation and performance using a structural equation model to test the study’s hypotheses. A multi-group analysis was used to examine the moderating roles of business life cycle on the relationships between partnership strength and diversity and product innovation. Findings Results found that product innovation implementation requires strong and diverse partnerships with suppliers to improve independent restaurant performance. Diverse partnerships have a more positive effect upon product innovation than do strong partnerships. The positive effect partnership strength with suppliers had upon product innovation was significantly greater for startup restaurants, while its positive effect of diversity was greater for established restaurants. Practical implications Findings can be used to establish effective strategic partnerships with independent restaurant suppliers and to manage them more effectively in consideration of their business characteristics being startup or established operations. Originality/value This study was an initial attempt to empirically prove significant roles of partnership strength and diversity applied to the context of independent restaurant product innovation. Findings regarding different effects of partnership strength and diversity contributed to the existing body of knowledge about strategic partnerships with suppliers.
39
Szczurowski, Tomasz. "OSOBOWE SPÓŁKI JEDNOOSOBOWE." Zeszyty Prawnicze 11, no. 2 (December 21, 2016): 381. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2011.11.2.20.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Single – Partner PartnershipSummary The Commercial Companies Code contains regulating of a single – member private limited-liability company and a single – member public company, but partnership can also have single partner. It can not be incorporate as a single – partner partnership, but it is possible that one partner remains in the partnership. First of all, a professional partnership can be single – partner partnerships (art. 98 § 2). However it is the most typical situation, I think that all kind of partnerships may have just one partner. That can happen when the partnership includes two partners and one of them terminates the articles of association or when one of them dies. In this case the partnership would have one partner during liquidation. Although the term of liquidation is unspecified, The Commercial Companies Code does not contains regulating the issue of single – partner partnership. This problem should be solved by applying general norms connecting with liquidation.
40
Tait, Lynda, and Sonal Shah. "Partnership working: a policy with promise for mental healthcare." Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 13, no. 4 (July 2007): 261–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.106.003178.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article describes the literature specific to partnership working across the National Health Service, social services and voluntary and community sector in order to summarise the potential advantages and challenges of partnerships. We explore the meaning of partnership working and review the policy developments and investment initiatives underpinning the Government's emphasis on partnership working between statutory services and the voluntary and community sector. A number of barriers hinder effective partnership working and we examine some possible solutions to overcome these. We then address the key issues influencing the approach to increasing the voluntary sector's participation in partnership activities within mental health services and provide brief examples of good practice. Finally, we discuss practical issues relevant to planning partnerships and the role consultant psychiatrists can play in initiating and developing partnership working between the voluntary sector and statutory mental health services.
41
Statz, Matthew, Deanna Ware, Nicholas Perry, David Huebner, Christopher Cox, Andre Brown, Steven Meanley, et al. "Primary and secondary supportive partnerships among HIV-positive and HIV-negative middle-aged and older gay men." PLOS ONE 16, no. 2 (February 17, 2021): e0245863. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245863.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This study describes the primary and secondary partnerships of aging gay men participating in the Understanding Patterns of Healthy Aging Among Men Who Have Sex with Men substudy of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and examines differences in the prevalence of these relationship structures by HIV status while adjusting for age, education, and race/ethnicity. Relationships were compared within the following structural categories: “only a primary partnership”, “only a secondary partnership”, “both a primary and secondary relationship”, or “neither a primary nor secondary relationship”. There were 1,054 participants (51.9% HIV negative/48.1% HIV positive) included in the study. Participants had a median age of 62.0 years (interquartile range: 56.0–67.0) and most reported being non-Hispanic white (74.6%) and college educated (88.0%). Of the 1,004 participants with available partnership status data, 384 (38.2%) reported no primary or secondary partnerships, 108 (10.8%) reported secondary-only partnership, 385 (38.3%) reported primary-only partnership, and 127 (12.6%) reported both primary and secondary partnerships. Of participants who reported primary partnerships only, the prevalence rates (PRs) were lower among those 62 years and older, HIV positive, black non-Hispanic and Hispanics. Of participants who reported only having a secondary partnership, the PRs were higher among those 62 years and older and HIV positive. Of participants who did not report having either a primary or secondary partnership, the PRs were higher among those 62 years and older, HIV positive, and black non-Hispanic compared with their respective referent groups. There was no significant difference in PRs of having both primary and secondary partnerships by age category, HIV status, race/ethnicity, and education. This study aimed to fill a knowledge gap in the literature regarding both primary and secondary supportive partnerships among aging HIV-positive and HIV-negative gay men.
42
Shevchuk, Oleksandr, Valentyna Zui, Igor Kompaniiets, Volodymyr Martynovskyi, and Yurii Matat. "Public-private partnerships in the healthcare sphere: legal models in Ukraine and foreign countries." Revista Amazonia Investiga 10, no. 37 (March 8, 2021): 168–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.34069/ai/2021.37.01.17.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The article discusses certain aspects of the legal regulation of public-private partnerships in the health sector in Ukraine and foreign countries. The subject of the study is the legislative acts of public-private partnerships in healthcare field, its types and directions for their implementation. The varieties of public-private partnership forms in healthcare field in foreign countries and Ukraine are clarified. Process of reforming the healthcare sector, introduction of standards and criteria of best practices of European countries on the issues of partnership under study in national legislation is appropriate and promising. The aim of the article is to disclose the features of legal regulation of public-private partnerships implementation in the healthcare field in foreign countries and Ukraine. The methodology of this work is based on a set of research methods. The comparative method was used to clarify the legal aspects of public-private partnerships in the healthcare field and the possibility of its use in Ukraine, to analyze indicators that determine the success of partnership projects in foreing countries. Using the method of theoretical analysis, systemic and analytical methods, the term of “public-private partnership in the healthcare field” was established, types of contracts, signs of public-private partnership, categories of such partnership models in world practice are given. Experience of the EU countries on public-private partnerships in healthcare field, the introduction of changes in healthcare management system in accordance with requirements of European law is positive for Ukraine.
43
Hasanah, N., N. D. Wahyono, H. Subagja, and N. Haryuni. "Optimization model : Broiler chicken farmers plasma members from the core partnership of broiler chicken farming in Indonesia for recruitment and welfare." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1338, no. 1 (May 1, 2024): 012069. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1338/1/012069.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the characteristics of broiler chicken farmers regarding their motivation in partnering in broiler chicken partnerships, to find out the factors that influence the loyalty of broiler chicken farmers to broiler chicken partnerships, and to know the optimization model for receiving BPJS contributions from members of broiler chicken partnerships. The method used is (research objective) this research is descriptive correlational, which aims to determine the description of the research variables and determine the relationship between these variables. The research results show that the breeder’s characteristics have a significant influence on the motivation to participate in the partnership. This means that the better the breeder’s characteristics, the higher the livestock’s motivation to participate in the partnership. From the results of the research presented, it can be concluded that Farmer characteristics influence the motivation for farmer participation in the plasma boiler chicken core partnership, farmer characteristics and community empowerment influence partnership member loyalty and motivation for participation in the partnership, community empowerment, partnership member loyalty, optimization of recruitment, and Empowerment influences member welfare, then member welfare influences the optimization of BPJS health contribution payments.
44
Greer, Jonathan. "Whither Partnership Governance in Northern Ireland?" Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 19, no. 5 (October 2001): 751–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/c0030.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Although partnerships are emerging as a central feature in governance arrangements in advanced capitalist societies, much discussion has taken place on the value and effectiveness of the approach. In recent years this debate has come to the fore in Northern Ireland, as a plethora of partnerships have been increasingly applied across a wide range of different government programmes at different levels of governance. Using a map of partnership arrangements in Northern Ireland, the author examines three case studies with a view to analysing the value and importance of partnership and assessing the activities that they do best. From this analysis, the author then discusses the future of partnership governance, outlines a number of areas for new research, and presents an agenda for development. As the case studies suggest that too much emphasis has been placed on developing a ‘process’, to the detriment of product outcomes, it is argued that partnerships need to adopt a dual approach to development by combining an inclusive process with greater strategic focus. At the regional level, however, a partnership framework is needed to facilitate coordination, reduce duplication, and improve understanding between partnerships, and between partnerships, local authorities, and government departments. Moreover, by adopting an inclusive approach, a partnership framework has the potential to provide a voice for the socially and politically excluded and to encourage participative planning and pluralist policymaking.
45
Aray, Yulia N., Ioannis Christodoulou, Denis A. Borodin, Elena V. Klimova, Svetlana G. Troshneva, and Nikita M. Paikin. "Collaboration between social entrepreneurs and large companies: Mutual value creation through different forms of partnerships." Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Management 22, no. 2 (2023): 151–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu08.2023.202.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The purpose of this paper is to deeply explore partnerships between large companies and social entrepreneurs. The objectives are as follows: to identify different types of partnerships between social entrepreneurs and large companies, determine mutual benefits of partnership, explore the challenges which large companies and social entrepreneurs face in the partnership. Important results of the paper shed light on this under-investigated relationship between social entrepreneurs and large companies. First, the study offers a new categorization of partnerships between social entrepreneurs and large companies. A new model — the Partnership Matrix accordingly was developed. This model is based on mutual benefits for both parties: Business, Innovation, Reputation — Impact, Survival, Scale. Second, benefits and obstacles to the development of collaboration between social entrepreneurs and large companies were identified. An extensive set of semi-structured interviews allowed to hold in-depth analysis of qualitative data. The research contributes to the literature on social entrepreneurship, business and society. The results of the research have practical implications; they can help social entrepreneurs and large companies to develop partnerships using more conscious, thoughtful and suitable approaches to mutual value creation. Keywords: cross-sector partnership, social entrepreneurship, corporate social responsibility, social partnership, hybrid organization.
46
Liechty, Toni, Mina Woo, Laura A. Rice, Chung-Yi Chiu, Stacy Kirkpatrick, Kay Hankins, Elsie Hedgspeth, et al. "Community Partners' Perspectives on Partnering With an Academic Research Team to Promote Disability-inclusive Fitness Programming." Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action 17, no. 3 (September 2023): 429–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/cpr.2023.a907973.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract: Background: Community-based fitness programs can support public health by providing access to physical activity opportunities for a vulnerable population with significant barriers. Unfortunately, programs specifically designed for people with disabilities (PWD) and staff training to promote inclusion for PWD in general population programs is limited. The current study aimed to review an on-going partnership that had formed to address this need. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess community partners' experiences with a community–academic partnership designed to implement a fitness program for people with multiple sclerosis and also to promote inclusion for PWD in community-based fitness programming. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six community partners who had been engaged in a formal partnership with the academic institution for 2 or more years to understand partners' experiences and perspectives about the partnership. Interviews were audio/video recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed thematically. Results: Participants described their experiences as falling into four main areas. Pre-partnership experiences (or lack thereof) shaped participants views on entering into academic partnerships. Communication and planning for mutual benefit were key to getting the partnership started. Partners identified challenges and factors for success while they were in the thick of partnership activities. Finally, evaluation allowed for assessment and improvement of the partnership itself and its ultimate goals. Conclusions: Findings suggest that academic–community partnerships can be ideal for promoting inclusion for PWD and highlight insights that can be used in the development of future partnerships.
47
O`Keeffe, Brendan. "Regional and Local Devolution in Ireland – the Potential of LEADER Partnerships to Provide Municipal Government." Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 7, no. 3 (October 14, 2009): 257–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.4335/86.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Emerging economic and social challenges prompted EU and national authorities to initiate and support localised or area-based partnership approaches to development. Such approaches involve enabling representatives from the state sector, social partners, community and voluntary groups to form collaborative partnership structures with competences in integrated local development in a defined geographical area. In terms of local development in Ireland, the most significant partnership structures that have emerged are LEADER Local Action Groups and Local Development Partnerships. Extensive studies of partnership processes, outputs and limitations in Ireland and throughout the EU reveal a number of limitations in the current degree of synergy between partnership and mainstream approaches. Emerging development approaches to the provision of social welfare and public services increasingly involve new forms of public-voluntary and public-private partnerships.
48
Rinkus, Marisa A., Tracy Dobson, Meredith L. Gore, and Erin A. Dreelin. "Collaboration as process: a case study of Michigan's watershed permit." Water Policy 18, no. 1 (June 2, 2015): 182–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2015.202.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Collaborative watershed management has been heavily promoted and widely implemented to address a variety of natural resource concerns, resulting in the adoption and adaptation of the approach to management by regulatory agencies. Although several characteristics or indicators of success for watershed partnerships have been identified in the literature, these often portray a direct cause and effect relationship between partnership characteristics and outcomes. However, partnerships involve dynamic processes that can be influenced by both form and function (internally and externally) throughout various stages of the partnerships' existence. Our study presents an evaluation framework from the group process and evaluation literature to highlight the importance of evaluating ‘intermediate measures of partnership effectiveness’ in watershed partnerships, using the case of Michigan's voluntary watershed-based stormwater permit. Given the increasing use of watershed partnerships in a regulatory setting that is constantly in flux and the difficulty in assessing the effects of such groups on water quality, results suggest the utility of ‘intermediate measures of partnership effectiveness’ for assessing partnership process in order to provide ongoing feedback and incentives to ensure long-term success.
49
Bedareva, N. "Partnership Diplomacy of China: Levels of Partnerships." Problemy Dalnego Vostoka, no. 2 (April 2019): 114–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s013128120004645-0.
Повний текст джерела
50
Rawstrone, Annette. "leadership under the EIF: partnerships: In partnership." Nursery World 2020, no. 11 (August 2, 2020): 42–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/nuwa.2020.11.42a.
Повний текст джерела