Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Partis de droite – France – 20e siècle"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Partis de droite – France – 20e siècle".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Partis de droite – France – 20e siècle":
Ros, Nathalie. "¿Compartir o repartir? Retos de delimitación marítima en el Mediterráneo oriental." Revista Estudios Jurídicos. Segunda Época, no. 23 (September 25, 2023): e7888. http://dx.doi.org/10.17561/rej.n23.7888.
Дисертації з теми "Partis de droite – France – 20e siècle":
Colas, Jean-François. "Les droites nationales en Lorraine dans les années 1930 : acteurs, organisations, réseaux." Paris 10, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002PA100151.
In Lorraine, in the 1930's, right-wing political parties did not manage to organize themselves durably and thoroughly but they were represented by numerous elected members, who resisted the push of left-wing parties, notably in 1932 and 1936. The republican Federation did not succeed in giving a concrete expression to its project to set up a solid organization. The « national » then got organized in punctual groupings from 1934 onward in several cities. The activits militated in Action française or in the patriotic Youths at the beginning of the 1930's. After february 6, 1934, Francisme, the Solidarité française, chiefly in the Moselle, and above all the Croix de feu expended unquestionably. Farmers also got organized, even if countrysides remained quiet altogether. Leagues' activists adhered to the parties which succeeded in the dissolved leagues in 1936. However, the P. S. F. Was the only party which evolved into a large scale party. Militants also took part in local assemblies in order to fight communism : the Front lorrain and the R. N. L. . Local leaders from the Croix de feu and later the P. S. F. Were related to other « national » organizations. Their background was similar : they were right-wing men, war veterans, reserve officers and Catholics. But they eventually obeyed La Rocque when he enjoined them to become independant. The P. S. F was then exposed to the hostility of other political groups from 1937 onward. The Croix de feu and the P. S. F. Could rely on the support of local newspapers, elected representatives, manufacturers and Catholics'spokesmen. However, notables reluctantly accepted La Rocque's electoral strategy. Lorraine political life evolved toward radicalisation and bipolarisation. Several MPs were related to leagues. They were connected to conservative Catholics, as were the leagues. They fought the same opponents : freemassons and left-wing parties. Anticommunism federated the « national », including certain activits opposed to the republican system. Representatives and notables of the republican Federation, implacable opponents to Front populaire, mixed with these militants. Xenophobe ideas spred, partly inspired by anti-german feelings. Never the less, other MPs remained moderate and the P. S. F ; appears as a centrist party. The « spirit of Lorraine » explains both anticommunism and national' mistrust of Germany, even if many accepted the Munich agreeement
Thomas, Jean-Paul. "Droite et rassemblement du PSF au RPF, 1936-1953 : hommes, réseaux, cultures : rupture et continuité d'une histoire politique." Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002IEPP0009.
Goure, Jean-Paul. "Les droites dans l'agglomération stéphanoise de 1851 à 1958." Saint-Etienne, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002STET2091.
A town infamous for its filth, stench and ugliness. A black town. A town of prostitution, squalor and alcoholism. A town voting the "wrong" way, torn apart by strikes. A town which murders a prefect. A dangerous town. A revolutionary town. A red town. So many assertions which need to be demystified, especially in political terms. Saint-Etienne seldom votes for extremes or for the worst possible line offered by politicians wishing to achieve their own ends. Nor has it been drawn to politicians who are headstrong in following unworkable policies in spite of all the evidence. Passionate outbursts against freemasons and Jews are the acts of e few desperate youths. Social marginalisation and racism do not form part of the cultural identity of the town. The extrême right has never played a major role here. Whenever the Republic has been threatened by uncompromising right-wing hard-liners, the inhabitants of Saint-Etienne have voted massively for the Left. Saint-Etienne is not a revolutionary town but a republican town. It was never sensitive to the siren calls of the Great Man, of the Saviour. It agreed to General de Gaulle's return to power because he embodied a path between a discredited Parisian political class, vainly casting about to support the status quo, and seditious movements in Algeria threatening the Republic. Neither is Saint-Etienne a town which ever was tempted by the dreams of communism. Over time the votes cast in Saint-Etienne reflect those in the rest of France, even though there might have sometimes been some discrepancy between the regional vote and national vote, as was the case for instance in 1936. In fact, the voters of Saint-Etienne, to some degree, have rejected the political game : whatever the election abstention is high. The favoured candidates are elected because they are perceived as particularly human or as being "men in the street" rather than because they belong to a particular party, as was the case for A. Pinay or A. De Fraissinette. The paradox of a working class town voting for the Right is only superficial. The inhabitants of Saint-Etienne are above all moderates who refuse illusions
Freysselinard, Éric. "Louis Marin (1871-1960), itinéraire, place et rôle d'un dirigeant des droites françaises du premier vingtième siècle." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Sorbonne université, 2024. https://accesdistant.sorbonne-universite.fr/login?url=https://theses-intra.sorbonne-universite.fr/2024SORUL040.pdf.
Louis Marin, proud of his Lorraine origins, was an ethnologist and an advocate for minority groups. He had a successful academic career before his election at the Moral and Political Sciences Academy in 1944. He was a member of Parliament representing Nancy for 46 years, President of the department of Meurthe-et-Moselle for 22 years, appointed Minister eight times, and he became President of the Republican Federation right-wing party in 1925. Marin was an enemy of Germany, opponent of the left-wing parties and masonic leagues, Catholic, a conservative in favour of reforms, and friend of François de Wendel. He managed to transform his party into an effective weapon against the “Cartel of the Left”. His intransigence against Germany led him to be isolated and lose support from other politicians, including Georges Pernot, Henri de Kerillis and Jean Ybarnégaray. In 1940, as his comrades such as Xavier Vallat and Philippe Henriot joined the Vichy government, he was one of the only right-wing members of Parliament to resist the German occupation. His ideological steadfastness and opposition to new political figures (Poincaré, Tardieu, de Gaulle), led him to withdraw from public life several years after the war and focus on his private life with his wife Fernande, who would dedicate her last twenty years to honoring his memory. This thesis depicts a man steeped in contradictions and flaws; having a bastard father, losing his mother because of the Germans and marrying his wife late in life without ever having children. It also analyses the difficulties of the right-wing parties to create unity, as a result of ideological issues as well as those of ego. Marin indeed saved the honour of the French right-wing in 1940, but failed to become a true leader
Gratien, Jean-Pierre. "Marius Moutet, de la question coloniale à la construction européenne : 1914-1962." Paris 1, 2004. http://www.theses.fr/2004PA010570.
Boisard, Stéphane. "L'émergence d'une nouvelle droite : monétarisme, conservatisme et autoritarisme au Chili (1955-1983)." Toulouse 2, 2001. http://www.theses.fr/2001TOU20054.
This thesis studies the emergence during the 1950 and 1960 decades of a New Right in Chile, its political nature and its ideological orientations. Originating at the Catholic University of Santiago, the New Right is then composed of two distincts groups : one is a young team of neoliberals economists trained at the University of Chicago and known as the "Chicago Boys" and the other is a conservative student movement influenced by Catholic fundamentalists, the Gremail Movement led by Jaime Guzmán. Three main structuring events punctuate the convergent evolution of those two groups that led to the creation of a political party in 1983, the "Independant Democratic Union". Within a background of total decay of the traditional right wing parties, the first event is the student rebellion at at the Catholic University in July 1967. As a reaction of defence of their social class, the two groups, opposed to the reformist students, meet for the first. Second, the democratic election of Salavador Allende in September 1970, the socialist candidate to the Presidency, sees the creation of the New Right and its involvement in the political fight. The New Right, part of the powerfull newspaper El Mercurio, actively participates in the October 1972 strike, prepares an alternative economic program and is in contact with the seditious Generals. Last, the military coup of September 11 1973 gives the New Right access to power. From 1975 onwards, while the "Chicago Boys" take charge of the different economic ministries, Jaime Guzmán imposes himself as the main ideologue of the regime and plays a very important part in the writing of the 1981 Constitution. On a ideological point of view, the New Right comes to maturity at the beginning of the 1980's with the creation of reviews such as Realidad and Estudios Publicos, which celebrate the reconciliation of neoliberalism and fundamental catholicism. The New Right and the General Pinochet dictatorship are envisioned in a dialectic relationship : one could not have existed and stay in power without the other. The systematic violation of Human Rights is the moral price that the New Right accepted to pay in order to perpetrate its ideology
Botopoulos, Costas. "Les socialistes à l'épreuve du pouvoir : France, Grèce, Espagne dans les années quatre-vingt : idées et pratiques constitutionnelles." Paris 1, 1991. http://www.theses.fr/1991PA010279.
The three socialist parties of France, Greece and Spain arrived in power having declared their intention to change profoundly the political system in their countries. The experience of power proved that it was the parties themselves, their political role and the way they function, which were to be transformed ; the socialist governments accepted the political institutions they inherited and did not even try to impose w new constitutionnal logic
Secondy, Philippe. "La droite extrême dans l'Hérault : 1890-1944 : sociologie historique d'une configuration politique." Montpellier 1, 2001. http://www.theses.fr/2001MON10012.
Lecoeur, Erwan. "Le Front national : sens et symboles. La construction d'un repli identitaire "ethnico-religieux" dans la France de la fin du XXe siècle." Tours, 2002. http://www.theses.fr/2002TOUR2023.
Périssol, Guillaume. "Le droit chemin. Jeunes délinquants en France et aux États-Unis au milieu du XXe siècle." Thesis, Sorbonne université, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018SORUL055.
The quality of mercy is not strain'd, It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven.” This Shakespeare quote was still used in the 1950s as the motto of the Boston Juvenile Court. It tended to replace the traditional repressive function of the law by an ideological function expressed by love. The American juvenile court model, highly imbued with the ideal of compassion and rehabilitation, had had a worldwide success since 1899, when the first juvenile court was created in Chicago. What lies behind the progressivism of the juvenile courts and the “judicial neohumanism” praised by Judge Jean Chazal after the 1945 law which heralded the veritable birth of juvenile courts in France? What signification can we give to the very rapid success of juvenile courts in the United States, Europe and throughout the world?The comparison between two interconnected Western countries can help answer these questions, while filling a historiographical gap, in order to better understand the juvenile justice system and the phenomenon of juvenile delinquency. The post-WW2 period is most pertinent for analysis, as acute questions concerning authority and education were being raised amid international delinquency panics. The study takes place in an innovative and interdisciplinary field, where youth history intersects with the history of justice and control. It is qualitative and quantitative, and is based on new archival material, such as the case files of the Boston Juvenile Court and the Seine Juvenile Court in Paris