Книги з теми "Parties to a public law dispute"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Parties to a public law dispute.

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 книг для дослідження на тему "Parties to a public law dispute".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Oellers-Frahm, Karin, and Andreas Zimmermann, eds. Dispute Settlement in Public International Law. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56626-4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Perceptions in litigation and mediation: Lawyers, defendants, plaintiffs, and gendered parties. Cambridge [UK]: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

La ejecución de la pena privativa de libertad: Una lectura desde la perspectiva del derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Bogotá: Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Timol, Farhad. Le public des maisons de justice. Saint-Denis: Observatoire du développement de la Réunion, 1998.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

McGillis, Daniel. Community dispute resolution programs and public policy. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Office of Communication and Research Utilization, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

James, Rhoda. Private ombudsmen and public law. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, Dartmouth, 1997.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Podziba, Susan L. Civic fusion: Mediating polarized public disputes. Chicago, IL: American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolution, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Der übermächtige Dritte: Eine rechtsvergleichende Untersuchung über den streitschlichtenden und streitentscheidenden Dritten. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1985.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Alternative dispute resolution for government contracts. Chicago: CCH Inc., 2004.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Miller, Gale. Dispute domains and welfare claims: Conflict and law in public bureaucracies. Greenwich, Conn: Jai Press, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
11

National Institute of Justice (U.S.). Office of Communication and Research Utilization. and Abt Associates, eds. Community dispute resolution programs and public policy: By Daniel McGillis. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Justice, National Institute of Justice, Office of Communication and Research Utilization, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
12

South Africa. Public Service Commission. Report on the dispute resolution mechanisms in the public service. Pretoria: Public Service Commission, 2003.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
13

Public health in international investment law and arbitration. New York, NY: Routledge, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
14

Suparmin. Model polisi pendamai dari perspektif alternative dispute resolution (ADR): Studi penyelesaian konflik antar partai politik. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
15

Wimberly, Gerard E. Best practices for resolving government contract disputes: Leading lawyers on preventing disputes, meeting the client's objectives, and achieving a successful outcome. [Boston, MA]: Aspatore Books, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
16

G, Jopillo Sylvia Ma. Third-party mediation: Applications in public policy disputes. Quezon City: Institute of Philippine Culture, Ateneo de Manila University, 1989.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
17

Jürschik, Corina Elisabeth-Antonia. Die Ausdehnung der Schiedsvereinbarung auf konzernzugehörige Unternehmen: "Group of Companies"-Doktrin und nationale Ausdehnungsinstitute. Hamburg: Kovač, 2011.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
18

Alberta. Dispute resolution process for government of Alberta construction contracts. Edmonton, AB: Govt. of Alberta, 1997.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
19

Alternative dispute resolution: A practical guide for resolving government contract controversies. Chicago, Illinois]: American Bar Association, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
20

Deen's list: ABC's on ADR : a handbook on alternative dispute resolution for busy professionals, parties, persons, practitioners & participants. Roswell, GA: Wolfe Pub., 1995.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
21

Garth, Bryant G. Public and private justice: Issues in ideology, professional interest, information, and private governance. Chicago: American Bar Foundation, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
22

Meier, Andrea. Einbezug Dritter vor internationalen Schiedsgerichten. Zürich: Schulthess, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
23

Tumanova, L. V. Lit︠s︡a, uchastvui︠u︡shchie v dele v t︠s︡eli︠a︡kh zashchity publichno-pravovykh interesov. Tverʹ: Tverskoĭ gos. universitet, 2001.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
24

Society of Professionals in Dispute Resolution (U.S.). Competencies for mediators of complex public disputes: An overview. Washington, DC: SPIDR, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
25

Israel. Israel law on political parties: Full text English translations of the Parties Law 5752-1992, Parties (Financing) Law 5733-1973, Elections (Ways of Propaganda) Law 5719-1959, Election to Public Bodies Law 5714-1954 and related subsidiary enactments. Haifa, Israel]: Aryeh Greenfield-A.G. Publications, 2008.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
26

Ausserprozessuale Streiterledigung im Bauvertrag auf der Grundlage der VOB-Vertragsbestimmungen. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 2000.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
27

Glied, Sherry. Another look at adjudication as a private good: A comparison of labor arbitration and the public courts. [Toronto]: Law and Economics Programme, Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
28

Bhargava, Prabha. Lok adalat: Justice at the door steps. Jaipur: INA Shree Publishers, 1998.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
29

United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Government Information, Justice, and Agriculture Subcommittee. FOIA: Alternate dispute resolution proposals : hearings before a subcommittee of the Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, first session, December 1 and 2, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
30

Dealing with differences: The drama of mediating public disputes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
31

Genn, Hazel G. Paths to justice: What people do and think about going to law. Oxford, England: Hart Pub., 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
32

Souza, Luciane Moessa de. Mediação de conflitos coletivos: A aplicação dos meios consensuais à solução de controvérsias que envolvem políticas públicas de concretização de direitos fundamentais. Belo Horizonte: Editora Fórum, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
33

Reichel, Marc. Das demokratische Offenheitsprinzip und seine Anwendung im Recht der politischen Parteien. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1996.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
34

Stolleis, Michael. Parteienstaatlichkeit, Krisensymptome des demokratischen Verfassungsstaats? Berlin: de Gruyter, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
35

Salcedo, César Rubio. Solución de controversias y régimen sancionador en la contratación estatal. Miraflores, Lima, Perú: Gaceta Jurídica, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
36

Ministers, Council of Europe Committee of. Communication to third parties of personal data held by public bodies: Recommendation no. R (91) 10 and explanatory memorandum. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Press, 1993.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
37

Meierhoefer, Barbara Stone. Court-annexed arbitration in ten district courts. Washington, D.C: Federal Judicial Center, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
38

Meierhoefer, Barbara Stone. Court-annexed arbitration in ten district courts. [Washington, D.C.]: Federal Judicial Center, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
39

Meierhoefer, Barbara Stone. Court-annexed arbitration in ten district courts. Washington, D.C. (1520 H. St., N.W., Washington 20005): Federal Judicial Center, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
40

Meierhoefer, Barbara Stone. Court-annexed arbitration in ten district courts. [Washington, DC: Information Services Office, Federal Judicial Center, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
41

Meierhoefer, Barbara Stone. Court-annexed arbitration in ten district courts. [Washington, DC: Information Services Office, Federal Judicial Center, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
42

David W, Rivkin, and Amirfar Catherine. Part III Public International Law Disputes, Climate Disputes, and Sustainable Development in the Energy Sector, 18 Climate Disputes and Sustainable Development in the Energy Sector: Future Directives. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198805786.003.0018.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This chapter addresses both climate change mitigation and climate change adaptation. It makes ‘the case for international arbitration’, analyzing in particular current dispute resolution structures on carbon trading and the specific set of arbitration rules developed by the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) to resolve environmental disputes. It shows how increased awareness of climate change and its effects have clearly influenced the litigation and arbitration worlds. Developing bespoke environmental arbitration rules offers a number of benefits, including transparency, procedural flexibility, access to technical experts and arbitrators with key climate change expertise, and the possibility of multiparty involvement. Such rules may be of particular benefit to parties involved in carbon credit trading systems and investment projects motivated by such systems.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
43

Andrea J, Menaker, and Hellbeck Eckhard. Part II Guide to Key Preliminary and Procedural Issues, 9 Piercing the Veil of Confidentiality: The Recent Trend towards Greater Public Participation and Transparency in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198758082.003.0009.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Over the past few years, the US, Canada, and the EU have incorporated ‘transparency’ provisions into their investment treaties. Arbitration under those treaties thus will not be confidential, regardless of the arbitral rules governing them. By contrast, Russia’s 2016 regulation for the negotiation of investment treaties expressly provides for confidentiality of arbitration, including the award, unless both parties consent in writing to disclose information. This chapter traces the development of public disclosure and participation in investment arbitration. It is divided into three sections: public access to arbitral documents, third-party written submissions, and public access to arbitration hearings. Each section addresses developments under NAFTA Chapter 11, the evolution of the practice under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Dispute (ICSID) Arbitration Rules, the approach taken by the new UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency, the status of other arbitration rules, and the practice of certain States as shown in their recent agreements.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
44

Markus S, Rieder, and Kreindler Richard. 1 Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199676811.003.0001.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This introductory chapter presents a brief overview of the practice of commercial arbitration in Germany against the background of German state court litigation. The term ‘commercial’ here refers to arbitration related to civil law disputes between parties and public international law (especially investment treaty-based) arbitration on the one hand and consumer arbitration on the other hand. Historically, the tradition of arbitration in Germany has its roots in the 1879 version of the Zivilprozessordnung (ZPO), which remained substantially unchanged up until 1997 when it was reformed in order to adapt it to the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration of 1985 with the intention to strengthen the attractiveness of Germany as a locale for international arbitration. The chapter also explores the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration compared to German state court litigation, and discuss special types of arbitration and means of alternative dispute resolution.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
45

Gabrielle, Kaufmann-Kohler, and Rigozzi Antonio. 7 The Law Applicable to the Merits and the Award. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199679751.003.0007.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Before describing the main features of an award, this chapter discusses the determination of the law governing the merits of the dispute or lex causae. It considers the role of party autonomy in this respect and examines the scope and content of the potentially applicable substantive laws that may be chosen by the parties or selected by arbitral tribunals, from national laws to transnational rules of law (the so-called lex mercatoria) over trade usages and ex aequo et bono principles. It also discusses the relevance and impact of international public policy and overriding or internationally mandatory rules. Turning to the award, the last part of the chapter sets out a typology of arbitral decisions, addresses the required form and content of awards and discusses the deliberation process as well as issues such as institutional scrutiny, dissenting opinions, and the notification, publication, and effects of the award.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
46

William W, Park. Part I International Arbitration Law, Arbitral Jurisdiction, and Arbitral Institutions, 1 Explaining Arbitration Law. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198783206.003.0002.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This chapter considers the challenges in explaining arbitration law. Unlike most fields of law that provide guidance on how courts decide cases, arbitration law tells judges when not to decide disputes, in deference to private decision-makers selected by the litigants. However, if one side regrets a decision to arbitrate, or the parties diverge about what the arbitration clause covers, courts may be asked to assist in implementing the arbitration agreement or resulting award. At such moments, arbitration law normally includes two limbs: first, to hold parties to their bargains to arbitrate; second, to monitor the basic integrity of the arbitral process, so the case will be heard by a fair tribunal that listens before deciding, stays within its mission, and respects the limits of relevant public policy. The chapter then discusses case studies that illustrate two issues that persistently vex courts and commentators: allocating tasks between judges and arbitrators; and determining what law applies to an arbitration clause.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
47

Markus S, Rieder, and Kreindler Richard. 3 The Arbitral Tribunal. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199676811.003.0003.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This chapter examines the arbitral tribunal which resolves dispute by way of arbitration. It discusses the number of arbitrators, the procedure of appointing arbitrators, the selection of arbitrators, the challenge, termination of the office and replacement of arbitrators, as well as the arbitrator agreement — a topic that has more attention in Germany than in other jurisdictions. The study is important as the arbitral tribunal is one of the most important strategic steps in any arbitration. In most cases, the parties and their counsel to believe that picking the right panel is a preeminent precondition for achieving the desired outcome. The chapter describes how under German law, the principles of independence and impartiality of an arbitration are non-derogable cornerstones of any arbitral proceedings. Essentially, they form part of the German procedural ordre public which are considered indispensable constitutional requirements in order for arbitral proceedings to be equivalent to state court litigation.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
48

Trevor C, Hartley. Part III Recognition and Enforcement, 19 Brussels and Lugano: Authentic Instruments and Court Settlements. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198729006.003.0019.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This chapter deals with the enforcement of two special kinds of legal instruments: authentic instruments and court settlements. Both are contracts and derive their validity from the consent of the parties. They normally acknowledge the indebtedness of one party to the other. Court settlements are usually concluded to put an end to a dispute. The special feature of both instruments is the way in which they are concluded, and it is this which gives them a special status in the country of origin, often equivalent to <i>res judicata</i>. What is striking about the provisions on these instruments in Brussels and Lugano is that the enforcement of an authentic instrument or court settlement originating in one Member State (Lugano State) is virtually automatic in other Member States (Lugano States): public policy is stated to be the only ground on which it may be contested.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
49

United States. Dept. of Justice. Civil Rights Division, ed. Voluntary civil dispute resolution policy. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
50

United States. Dept. of Justice. Civil Rights Division., ed. Voluntary civil dispute resolution policy. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії