Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Paradox / Статті в журналах

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Paradox.

Статті в журналах з теми "Paradox"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021

Оновлено: 30 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Paradox".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Roskamm, Nikolai. "Ein multiples Paradox." Migration und Soziale Arbeit, no. 2 (June 17, 2021): 139–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.3262/mig2102139.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In den aktuellen Debatten über Migration ist das Paradox eine zentral gestellte Denkfigur. Mit dieser Schwerpunktsetzung befasse ich mich in meinem Beitrag. In einem ersten Schritt rekonstruiere ich einige Paradoxa, die in zwei aktuellen Schlüsseltexten der postmigrantischen Literatur verwendet werden – das Integrationsparadox, das Tocqueville-Paradox, das demokratische Paradox und das normative Paradox. In einem zweiten Schritt diskutiere ich Möglichkeiten, den paradoxale Ansatz auf der theoretischen Ebene weiter zu schärfen und schlage dafür Anleihen im radikaldemokratischen Antagonismus- und Kontingenzdenken der politischen Ontologie vor.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Arancibía Carrizo, Juan Pablo. "Comunidad, Tragedia y Melancolía: Estudio para una Concepción Trágica de lo Político." Revista Grafía- Cuaderno de trabajo de los profesores de la Facultad de Ciencias Humanas. Universidad Autónoma de Colombia 10, no. 2 (July 14, 2013): 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.26564/16926250.496.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Resumen:El presente artículo propone el examen de cuatro categorías y cuatro paradojas de la experiencia política moderna, que a partir de su problematicidad y significación, pudieran ser repensadas y reinscritas en una «concepción trágica de lo político». Primera paradoja: La «comunidad» se quiere y no se alcanza. Segunda paradoja: la tragedia deviene «sentido trágico». Tercera paradoja: Gubernamentalidad biopolítica: queriendo libertad, la niega. Cuarta paradoja. «melancolía»: despotencia que en su retiro, deviene fuerza.Palabras clave: Comunidad, Tragedia, Biopolítica, Melancolía*******************************************************************Community, tragedy and melancholia: Study for a tragic conception of the PoliticsAbstractThe present article proposes the examination of four categories and four paradoxes of modern politics experience, which as low as their quandary and signification could be re-thought and registered en a “tragic conception of the politics”. Firs paradox: The “community” is wanted but not reached. Second paradox: the tragedy becomes “tragic sense”. Third paradox: Bio-politics government: wishing liberty, it is denied. Fourth paradox: “melancholia”: de strengthen that in its leaving becomes force.Key words: Community, tragedy, bio-politics, melancholia. *********************************************************Comunidade, Tragédia e Melancolia: Estudo para uma ConcepçãoTrágica do PolíticoResumoO presente artigo propõe o exame de quatro categorias e quatro paradoxos da experiência política moderna, que a partir de sua problematicidade e significação, puderam ser repensadas e reinscritas numa «concepção trágica do político». Primeiro paradoxo: a «comunidade» se quer e não se consegue. Segundo paradoxo: a tragédia devem «sentido trágico». Terceiro paradoxo: Governamentalidade biopolítica: querendo liberdade, a nega. Quarto paradoxo. «melancolia»: dês-potência que no seu retiro, devem força.Palavras chave: Comunidade, tragédia, biopolítica, melancolia.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

O'Donnell, Thomas F. "“A paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox. This paradox”." Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders 9, no. 5 (September 2021): 1087–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.04.017.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Duysens, Jacques, and Jorik Nonnekes. "Parkinson's Kinesia Paradoxa Is Not a Paradox." Movement Disorders 36, no. 5 (March 3, 2021): 1115–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mds.28550.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Clark, Michael. "Paradox 9: Heraclitus' paradox." Think 3, no. 9 (2005): 59–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1477175600002086.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Cannon, Helen B. "The Paradox of Paradox." Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 24, no. 2 (July 1, 1991): 149–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/45227768.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Bush, Andrew. "A Paradox, A Paradox, A Most Ingenious Paradox!" Chest 160, no. 4 (October 2021): 1171–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.034.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Bush, Andrew. "A Paradox, A Paradox, A Most Ingenious Paradox!" Chest 160, no. 4 (October 2021): 1171–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2021.05.034.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Ronidin, Ronidin. "PEMBACAAN DEKONSTRUKSI CERPEN "ZINA" KARYA PUTU WIJAYA." Puitika 11, no. 1 (April 8, 2015): 36. http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/puitika.11.1.36--51.2015.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This article is aimed at revealing the paradox meaning of some events in short story “Zina” written by Putu Wijaya. The short story “Zina” is chosen to be analyzed because it describes some unique events in the short story and they are beyond of common logic. The analysis of this short story is conducted by using deconstruction approach. It is a qualitative research and it is described descriptively. Based on the result of the analysis, it is found that the unique events that are found in short story “Zina” which seems paradox with common sense, in fact there is a truth inside. A wife who ask permission to her husband to have an affair with somebody else, a forbidden affair that is done in front of palace and bus way line, and an open affair in front of public are unique events that hide many paradox meanings. Some of paradox meanings are; the importance of husband’s admittance for a wife, the importance of new atmospheres in a family, and the importance of governing social awareness. Keywords: short story, paradox, approval, wife, husband, adulteryABSTRAK Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan makna paradok beberapa peristiwa dalam cerpen “Zina” karya Putu Wijaya. Cerpen “Zina” dipilih untuk dianalisis karena menggambarkan beberapa peristiwa aneh dan di luar logika biasa. Analisis terhadap cerpen ini akan dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan dekonstruksi. Analisis bersifat kualitatif dan disajikan secara deskriptif. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, diperoleh gambaran bahwa keanehan-keanehan yang terdapat dalam cerpen “Zina”, yang seolah-olah bertentangan dengan pendapat umum, pada kenyataannya mengandung kebenaran. Istri yang minta izin suami untuk berzina, perzinaan pasangan suami istri di depan istana dan lajur bus way, dan perzinaan terbuka suami istri itu di depan umum dan ditonton banyak orang merupakan peristiwa aneh yang menyembunyikan makna paradok. Di antara makna paradok itu adalah pentingnya izin suami bagi istri, pentingnya suasana-suasana baru dalam keluarga, dan pentingnya membangun kepedulian sosial. Kata Kunci: cerpen, paradoks, izin, istri, suami, zina

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Pyysiäinen, Ilkka. "Sounds of Silence. «Mystical» Paradox in the Atthakavagga." Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 15 (2000): 32–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/fejf2000.15.paradox.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Fan, Qiyu. "A review of the explanations to the twin paradox." Theoretical and Natural Science 30, no. 1 (January 15, 2024): 172–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.54254/2753-8818/30/20241098.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The Twin Paradox is a representative problem in special relativity. It proposed a problem that from a spacecraft that is moving at a speed close to light, the earths time will be slower; in contrast, the earth will also consider the time of the spacecraft slower. However, this paradoxs solution can expand beyond the special relativity and Lorentz transformation. Basically, the seeming paradox can be solved using the period when the spacecraft turns around. Therefore, it can be considered a good way to have a better understanding of relativity. In this paper, this paradox is explained in three ways: the Lorentz transformation, the Minkowski geometry, a special geometry including both space and time, which is proposed to have a better explanation of the special relativity and gravitational time dilation in general relativity, and will also expand to other effects in relativity, such as the gravitational redshift. This paper hopes to offer some references for a better understanding of the Twin Paradox.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Welles, James. "Psychotic Paradox Advanced." Psychology and Mental Health Care 4, no. 4 (July 10, 2020): 01. http://dx.doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/079.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

In terms of intellectual development, human behavior may be viewed as adaptive and mala- daptive. In the short run, it may be adaptive in that it can help an individual adjust to his own cultural values by leading him/her to accept any blantant contradictions between the real and ideal. As a mechanslm for short-term adaptation,

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Welles, James. "Psychotic Paradox Proposed." Psychology and Mental Health Care 4, no. 3 (May 25, 2020): 01. http://dx.doi.org/10.31579/2637-8892/075.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

PR, Sanches. "First Record of Polymelia in the Paradox Frog Pseudis Paradoxa (Linnaeus, 1758) from Northern Brazil." International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology 3, no. 1 (2020): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.23880/izab-16000204.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

During herpetofaunal monitoring studies on ESEC Maraca-Jipioca we found an individual Pseudis paradoxa exhibiting morphological abnormality. We diagnose abnormality following current etiology in herpetological literature and tested movement of member affected by touching. The anuran presented polymely in the right hand with duplicated radio-ulna linked to a pair of fully formed fingers. Since ESEC Maracá-Jipioca is a coastal island with very low anthropogenic impact, we think abnormality observed is more linked to endogenous factors or parasite infection, which is a common cause for polymely.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Datta, Lois-ellin. "Paradox Lost and Paradox Regained." American Journal of Evaluation 34, no. 2 (May 6, 2013): 254–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098214013478143.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Kasting, James F. "Paradox lost and paradox foun." Nature 355, no. 6362 (February 1992): 676–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/355676a0.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

SAITO, MORIO. "French paradox and European paradox." Japanese Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 54, no. 3 (1996): 223–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5264/eiyogakuzashi.54.223.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Greenstein, Noah. "The Paradox Paradox Non-Paradox and Conjunction Fallacy Non-Fallacy." Australasian Journal of Logic 20, no. 3 (October 19, 2023): 478–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/ajl.v20i3.8195.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Brock and Glasgow recently introduced a new definition of paradox and argue that this conception of paradox itself leads to paradox, the so-called Paradox Paradox. I show that they beg the questions during the course of their argument, but, more importantly, do so in a philosophically interesting way: it reveals a counterexample to the equivalence between being a logical truth and having a probability of one. This has consequences regarding norms of rationality, undermining the grounds for the Conjunction Fallacy.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Sousa, Domingos Salgado de. "O PARADOXO DA ENCARNAÇÃO: CRÍTICA DE KIERKEGAARD À TEOLOGIA ESPECULATIVA DO SEU TEMPO." Perspectiva Teológica 48, no. 3 (December 22, 2016): 559. http://dx.doi.org/10.20911/21768757v48n3p559-582/2016.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: Kierkegaard é frequentemente apresentado como o solitário opositor das correntes dominantes do pensamento filosófico e teológico do século XIX. É, porém, no âmbito da cristologia, onde se torna mais evidente tal oposição. Kierkegaard elaborou a sua doutrina do paradoxo em resposta ao uso do princípio hegeliano da mediação na teologia especulativa do seu tempo. Contrariamente à teologia especulativa, Kierkegaard defende que a realidade divina e humana não estão subjacentemente unidas, mas formam polos completamente opostos, separados por uma diferença qualitativa infinita. Ao conciliar realidades opostas em si, o paradoxo da manifestação de Deus no tempo opõe-se a qualquer forma de mediação. O conceito de paradoxo é interpretado por alguns críticos como uma contradição lógica. É assinalado que Kierkegaard ao apresentar a fé como única forma de acesso ao paradoxo está a exigir do crente que coloque de parte a lógica e aceite o que é ininteligível à razão humana. A encarnação como objeto de fé, porém, não é paradoxal no sentido de violar os princípios lógicos, mas no sentido de que transcende absolutamente a compreensão humana.ABSTRACT: Kierkegaard is often portrayed as the lone protester against the dominant currents of nineteenth century philosophical and theological thought. It is, however, within the Jeld of Christology where such objections are most clearly evident. Kierkegaard developed his doctrine of the paradox in response to the use made of the Hegelian principle of mediation by the speculative theology of his time. Contrary to speculative theology, Kierkegaard argues that divine and human natures are not immanently united, but that they constitute opposing poles, separated by a qualitative infinite difference. By combining the opposing realities within it, the paradox of God’s revelation in time is contrary to any form of mediation. Some critics have interpreted the concept of the paradox as alogical contradiction. It is pointed out that by viewing faith as the only away of gaining access to the paradox, Kierkegaard is demanding that the believer put logic aside and embrace what is unintelligible to human reason. The incarnation as an object of faith, however, is not paradoxical in the sense that it violates the principles of logic, but in the sense that it absolutely transcends human understanding.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Toyono, Manatomo. "Paradox." Pediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery 38, no. 1 (February 1, 2022): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.9794/jspccs.38.1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Chung, Kevin C. "Paradox." Journal of Hand Surgery 47, no. 1 (January 2022): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.10.005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

NAVARRO PUERTO, Mercedes. "Paradox." Journal of the European Society of Women in Theological Research 14 (December 1, 2006): 27–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/eswtr.14.0.2019304.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

&NA;. "Paradox." Journal of Christian Nursing 17, no. 1 (2000): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005217-200017010-00004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Wilde, Alora. "Paradox." Red Cedar Review 47, no. 1 (2012): 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/rcr.2012.0016.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Wolverton, Terry. "Paradox." Prairie Schooner 78, no. 1 (2004): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/psg.2004.0060.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Iredale, Mathew. "A paradox solves a paradox, paradoxically." Philosophers' Magazine, no. 41 (2008): 44–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/tpm20084175.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

al Attar, Mohsen. "TWAIL: a Paradox within a Paradox." International Community Law Review 22, no. 2 (May 29, 2020): 163–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341426.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract What insight do critical perspectives bring to international legal theory? In the following article, I answer this question through an examination of Third World Approaches to International Law (TWAIL). Troubled by geopolitical imbalance in the enterprise of international law, a group of critically minded scholars sought to expand the scope of legal scholarship. They would do so by growing a scholarly community sensitive to Third World concerns in their engagement with international law. Movements are known to collapse just as quickly as they sprout and it is testament to TWAIL’s force that, twenty years on, it is still gaining momentum. Self-described as a theory, method, sensibility, movement, and, as per the moniker, approach, TWAIL’s place in legal theory remains ambiguous. Drawing on a range of TWAIL scholars as well as journeymen commentators, I investigate, first, how its scholars represent TWAIL’s theoretical credentials and, second, where its contribution fits in the field.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Bar-Hillel, Maya, and Avishai Margalit. "Gideon's paradox ? A paradox of rationality." Synthese 63, no. 2 (May 1985): 139–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00485364.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Stepan, Vladimir, and Stanislav Otahal. "Is Codman's paradox really a paradox?" Journal of Biomechanics 39, no. 16 (January 2006): 3080–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.09.011.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Giesen, J. C. A. H., N. Gier, and R. C. Havermans. "The paradox of the choice paradox." Appetite 83 (December 2014): 352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.06.065.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Abdy, Muhammad, Awi Dassa, and Sri Julia Nensi. "Konsep Himpunan Fuzzy pada Paradoks Russel." Journal of Mathematics, Computations, and Statistics 2, no. 2 (May 12, 2020): 189. http://dx.doi.org/10.35580/jmathcos.v2i2.12582.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Himpunan fuzzy menggunakan dasar logika fuzzy untuk menyatakan suatu objek menjadi anggota dengan derajat keanggotaan ( ), tetapi Logika fuzzy melanggar hukum logika biner sehingga muncul anggapan bahwa logika fuzzy memiliki masalah yang sama dengan paradoks. Tetapi nilai kebenarana logika fuzzy tergantung dari derajat keanggotaan yang dimilikinya sehingga dapat ditarik sebuah kesimpulan dari besar darajat keanggotaan tersebut, sedangkan paradoks nilai kebenarannya tidak dapat ditarik kesimpulan apapun. Paradoks merupakan bentuk kritik landasan yang bertujuan untuk mengungkapkan dan menentukan inkonsistensi atau kontradiksi yang dihasilkan dari beberapa eksperimen mental dalam matematika, salah satu paradoks yang terkenal dalam kritik landasan teori himpunan adalah paradok Russel Pemecahan paradoks Russel dengan menggunakan konsep teori himpunan fuzzy diperoleh derajat keanggotaan adalah 0.5 merupakan pernyataan setengah benar (half true) dan adalah 0.5 jugan merupakan pernyataan setengah benar (half true). Kata kunci: Logika fuzzy, himpunan fuzzy, paradoks, paradoks Russel.Fuzzy sets use the basis of fuzzy logic to declare an object to be a member with the degree of membership ( ), but fuzzy logic violates the law of binary logic so that the assumption arises that fuzzy logic has the same problem with paradox. But the true value of fuzzy logic depends on the degree of membership it has so that a conclusion can be drawn from the large membership ranks, while the paradox of its value cannot be drawn any conclusions. The paradox is a form of ground criticism that aims to express and determine the inconsistencies or contradictions that result from several mental experiments in mathematics, one of the paradoxes that is well-known in critics of set theory is Russel's paradox . The paradoxical solution of Russell by using fuzzy set theory concepts is that the degree of membership is 0.5 and is 0.5.Keywords: Fuzzy Logic, fuzzy set, paradox, Russel paradox.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Dale-Ferguson, Darryl. "Limiting Evil: The Value of Ideology for the Mitigation of Political Alienation in Ricoeur’s Political Paradox." Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies 5, no. 2 (December 23, 2014): 48–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5195/errs.2014.258.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

AbstractThis paper uses Paul Ricœur’s analyses of ideology to argue for the mitigation of the possibility of political evil within the political paradox. In explicating the paradox, Ricœur seeks to hold in tension two basic aspects of politics: its benefits and its propensity to evil. This tension, however, should not be viewed as representative of a dualism. The evil of politics notwithstanding, Ricœur encourages us to view the political order as a deeply important part of our shared existence. By thinking past the distorting function of ideology to the legitimating and integrating functions that Ricœur calls more basic than distortion, a mode of thought that is often at the heart of political evil, ideology can be used to mitigate that very evil.Keywords: Ricœur, “The Political Paradox,” Ideology, Political Violence, Justice.RésuméCet article s’appuie sur les analyses ricœuriennes de l’idéologie dans le but de montrer que l’idéologie est susceptible de contribuer à une atténuation du mal politique inhérent au paradoxe politique. Dans son explicitation de ce paradoxe, Ricœur cherche à mettre en relation tensionnelle deux aspects fondamentaux de la politique: ses avantages et ses maux. Cependant, cette tension ne devrait pas être interprétée comme l’expression d’un dualisme. En dépit du mal inhérent au politique, Ricœur nous encourage à voir l’ordre politique comme une partie profondément importante de notre existence partagée. Si l’on régresse en-deçà de la fonction de distorsion de l’idéologie vers ses fonctions légitimantes et integratrices, c’est-à-dire vers ses fonctions les plus fondamentales, il apparaît en effet que l’idéologie, tout en étant souvent au cœur du mal politique, peut néanmoins être utilisée pour atténuer ce mal.Mots-clés: Ricœur, paradoxe politique, ideologie, violence politique, justice.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Viana Leite, Rafael. "Terrível e agradável: sobre o paradoxo da experiência estética em três poéticas francesas." Viso: Cadernos de estética aplicada 11, no. 21 (August 31, 2016): 140–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.22409/1981-4062/v21i/233.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Analisarei o paradoxo formulado por Jean-Baptiste Dubos a respeito da experiência estética no teatro, a partir da leitura das Réflexions critiques sur la poésie et sur la peinture. Tentarei propor uma interpretação alternativa àquela feita por Paisley Livingston em seu artigo intitulado Du Bos paradox. Para tanto, após uma introdução sobre o tema e a obra de Dubos, apresentarei dois movimentos argumentativos. O primeiro, de construção do paradoxo mencionado, seguido de uma comparação com outros autores e o segundo, por sua vez, será dedicado à explicação do paradoxo.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Ladov, Vsevolod. "Is the Liar Paradox a semantic paradox?" ΣΧΟΛΗ. Ancient Philosophy and the Classical Tradition 13, no. 1 (2019): 285–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1995-4328-2019-13-1-285-293.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The Liar Paradox has been widely discussed from the ancient times and preserved its importance in contemporary philosophy of logic and mathematics. At the beginning of the 20th century, F.P. Ramsey asserted that the Liar Paradox is different from pure logical paradoxes such as Russell’s paradox. The Liar Paradox is connected with language and can be considered a semantic paradox. Ramsey's point of view has become widespread in the logic of the 20th century. The author of the article questions this view. It is argued that the Liar Paradox cannot be unequivocally attributed to the semantic paradoxes and therefore Ramsey's point of view should be revised.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Allebeck, P. "The prevention paradox or the inequality paradox?" European Journal of Public Health 18, no. 3 (February 7, 2008): 215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckn048.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Cook, Roy T. "The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox." Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89, no. 3 (September 2011): 467–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2010.500671.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Clark, Michael. "Paradox 8: The paradox of the gods." Think 3, no. 8 (2004): 107–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1477175600001081.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

38

Ostrovskii, Victor E. "“Paradox of Heterogeneous Catalysis”: Paradox or Regularity?" Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 43, no. 12 (June 2004): 3113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ie049923j.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Cheng, Tsung O. "Is the hippocrates paradox really a paradox?" Journal of the American College of Cardiology 43, no. 3 (February 2004): 505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.006.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Archer, Alfred, and Michael Ridge. "The heroism paradox: another paradox of supererogation." Philosophical Studies 172, no. 6 (August 8, 2014): 1575–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0365-1.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Tartaglia, A. "Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?" European Journal of Physics 19, no. 3 (May 1, 1998): 307–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/19/3/015.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

42

Cunha, Miguel Pina e., and Linda L. Putnam. "Paradox theory and the paradox of success." Strategic Organization 17, no. 1 (October 31, 2017): 95–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476127017739536.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The study of paradox in strategy and organization studies has grown rapidly over the last 25 years. Paradox, as contradictory yet interrelated opposites that exist simultaneously and persist over time, can be qualified as a successful area of study. Yet success, however sweet, may come at a price, namely, premature convergence on theoretical concepts, overconfidence in dominant explanations, and institutionalizing labels that protect dominant logics. We discuss the risk of paradox theory being vulnerable to the paradox of success and focus on ways to avoid narrowness in theory building.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

43

Klinaku, Shukri. "The “triplet paradox” overthrows the “twin paradox”." Results in Physics 48 (May 2023): 106476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106476.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

44

Nečas, Jiří. "Petersburg paradox and equal taxation." Politická ekonomie 54, no. 1 (February 1, 2006): 56–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.546.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Almeida, Rogério Miranda de. "LUTERO E A TRADIÇÃO CATÓLICA MEDIEVAL." Perspectiva Teológica 50, no. 1 (April 27, 2018): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.20911/21768757v50n1p163-178/2018.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: Estas reflexões têm como objetivo principal explorar as semelhanças e diferenças que existem entre a Reforma de Lutero e a tradição católica medieval da qual ela deriva. Com isto, farei também ressaltar o paradoxo do entre-dois que caracteriza este movimento e, mais especificamente, a concepção teológica do Reformador. Não se trata, portanto, de uma pura e simples ruptura com o universo medieval; não se trata tampouco de uma mera continuidade com relação à teologia que se desenvolvera ao longo da Escolástica latina. Trata-se, ao invés, do paradoxo de uma exclusão interna, porquanto o que realmente ocorreu foi uma reinterpretação, uma reelaboração e um deslocamento de ênfase a partir de um questionamento teológico fundamental que marcou o pensamento do Reformador. Em outros termos, Lutero se exclui do universo simbólico medieval, mas a partir de dentro.SUMMARY: These reflections aim at exploring the similarities and differences between Luther’s Reformation and the Catholic medieval tradition from which it derives. In doing so, I intend to underline the in between paradox that characterizes this movement and, more specifically, Luther’s theological conception. Therefore, it is not a question of a pure and simple rupture with the medieval universe; it is not either a question of mere continuity with the theology developed throughout Latin scholasticism. It is rather a question of paradox, the paradox of an internal exclusion. F What really occurred was a reinterpretation, a new elaboration and a shift of emphasis from the fundamental theological questioning that had marked the Reformer’s thought. In short, Luther excluded himself from the symbolic medieval universe, but from inside.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Almeida, Rogério Miranda de. "LUTERO E A TRADIÇÃO CATÓLICA MEDIEVAL." Perspectiva Teológica 50, no. 1 (April 27, 2018): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.20911/21768757v50n1p163/2018.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

RESUMO: Estas reflexões têm como objetivo principal explorar as semelhanças e diferenças que existem entre a Reforma de Lutero e a tradição católica medieval da qual ela deriva. Com isto, farei também ressaltar o paradoxo do entre-dois que caracteriza este movimento e, mais especificamente, a concepção teológica do Reformador. Não se trata, portanto, de uma pura e simples ruptura com o universo medieval; não se trata tampouco de uma mera continuidade com relação à teologia que se desenvolvera ao longo da Escolástica latina. Trata-se, ao invés, do paradoxo de uma exclusão interna, porquanto o que realmente ocorreu foi uma reinterpretação, uma reelaboração e um deslocamento de ênfase a partir de um questionamento teológico fundamental que marcou o pensamento do Reformador. Em outros termos, Lutero se exclui do universo simbólico medieval, mas a partir de dentro.SUMMARY: These reflections aim at exploring the similarities and differences between Luther’s Reformation and the Catholic medieval tradition from which it derives. In doing so, I intend to underline the in between paradox that characterizes this movement and, more specifically, Luther’s theological conception. Therefore, it is not a question of a pure and simple rupture with the medieval universe; it is not either a question of mere continuity with the theology developed throughout Latin scholasticism. It is rather a question of paradox, the paradox of an internal exclusion. F What really occurred was a reinterpretation, a new elaboration and a shift of emphasis from the fundamental theological questioning that had marked the Reformer’s thought. In short, Luther excluded himself from the symbolic medieval universe, but from inside.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Franceschi, Paul. "Une analyse dichotomique du paradoxe de l’examen-surprise." Articles 32, no. 2 (December 16, 2005): 399–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/011875ar.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Résumé Je présenterai dans ce qui suit un cadre conceptuel nouveau pour résoudre le « paradoxe de l’examen-surprise » (surprise examination paradox, soit SEP), en ce sens qu’il réorganise en les adaptant plusieurs éléments de solution décrits dans la littérature. La solution proposée ici repose sur les éléments essentiels suivants : a) une distinction entre analyse moniste et dichotomique du paradoxe ; b) l’introduction d’une définition matricielle, qui sert de support à différentes variations du paradoxe ; c) la distinction entre une définition conjointe et disjointe des cas de surprise et de non-surprise conduisant à deux notions structurellement distinctes de surprise.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

CHERUVALATH, Reena. "Analysing the Concept of “Paradox” in the Liar Paradox Arguments." Cultura 17, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 87–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3726/cul012020.0006.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Abstract: This paper examines the concept of “paradox” in the Liar paradox. The paradox in the “Liar Paradox” arguments is created with the support of law of contradiction. Four arguments consist of different versions of the Liar paradox are analysed. The author explains the issues related to communication, beliefs and the principle of identity in the various arguments of the Liar paradox leading to inconsistencies. There are ambiguities in these arguments and if the ambiguities are removed, then there is no contradiction which constitutes the paradox. Thus, the “paradox” in the “Liar Paradox” arguments is questionable.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Kachalin, Anatoly M., and Vladimir A. Sirota. "GEOPOLAR PARADOX." Ideas and Innovations 9, no. 1 (2021): 62–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.48023/2411-7943_2021_9_1_62.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Browning, Scott, and Rachel Hull. "Reframing paradox." Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 52, no. 4 (August 2021): 360–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pro0000384.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!