Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Ontologia processuale"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Ontologia processuale".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Ontologia processuale"
1
Renault, Emmanuel. "Critical Theory and Processual Social Ontology." Journal of Social Ontology 2, no. 1 (March 4, 2016): 17–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jso-2015-0013.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
AbstractThe purpose of this article is to bridge the gap between critical theory as understood in the Frankfurt school tradition on the one hand, and social ontology understood as a reflection on the ontological presuppositions of social sciences and social theories on the other. What is at stake is the type of social ontology that critical theory needs if it wants to tackle its main social ontological issue: that of social transformation. This paper’s claim is that what is required is neither a substantial social ontology, nor a relational social ontology, but a processual one. The first part of this article elaborates the distinction between substantial, relational and processual social ontologies. The second part analyzes the various ways in which this distinction can be used in social ontological discussions. Finally, the third part focuses on the various possible social ontological approaches to the issue of social transformation.
2
Yates, Julian S., Leila M. Harris, and Nicole J. Wilson. "Multiple ontologies of water: Politics, conflict and implications for governance." Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 35, no. 5 (March 27, 2017): 797–815. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263775817700395.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
We ask what it would mean to take seriously the possibility of multiple water ontologies, and what the implications of this would be for water governance in theory and practice. We contribute to a growing body of literature that is reformulating understanding of human–water relations and refocusing on the fundamental question of what water ‘is’. Interrogating the political–ontological ‘problem space’ of water governance, we explore a series of ontological disjunctures that persist. Rather than seeking to characterize any individual ontology, we focus on the limitations of silencing diverse ontologies, and on the potential of embracing ontological plurality in water governance. Exploring these ideas in relation to examples from the Canadian province of British Columbia, we develop the notion of ontological conjunctures, which is based on networked dialogue among multiple water ontologies and which points to forms of water governance that begin to embrace such a dialogue. We highlight water as siwlkw and the processual concept of En’owkin as examples of this approach, emphasizing the significance of cross-pollinating scholarship across debates on water and multiple ontologies.
3
Chaerki, Karine Francisconi, and Queila Regina Souza Matitz. "ORGANIZAÇÃO COMO EVENTO: IMPLICAÇÕES CONCEITUAIS E TEÓRICAS DA ADOÇÃO DE UMA ONTOLOGIA PROCESSUAL STRONG-VIEW." REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre) 27, no. 2 (August 2021): 496–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-2311.322.102252.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
RESUMO Estudos organizacionais com base em metafísica processual têm gerado crescente interesse ao longo das últimas décadas. Segundo essa perspectiva ontológica, uma visão processual demanda a substituição de explicações simplificadoras da realidade fundamentadas na ideia de substância por explicações mais complexas com base na noção de processo e de relacionalidade. O objetivo central deste artigo consiste em discutir implicações da adoção de uma noção de evento de base ontológica processual strong-view no campo de estudos organizacionais. Para tanto, foi desenvolvido um ensaio teórico fundamentado na: (i) exploração do conceito de evento com base na ontologia processual de Alfred North Whitehead e (ii) identificação de possibilidades da adoção dessa noção de evento para os estudos organizacionais. Como principal resultado do trabalho, destaca-se a discussão de seis princípios ou proposições relacionadas ao conceito de organização com base nessa noção strong-view de evento: organização como estrutura de eventos, ontologia organizacional ancorada em sua temporalidade, eventos como unidades de análise organizacional, organização como processo contínuo, organização como resultado de mecanismos de estabilização dinâmica, organização como reiteração de padrões.
4
Gazit, Orit. "Van Gennep Meets Ontological (In)Security: A Processual Approach to Ontological Security in Migration." International Studies Review 21, no. 4 (June 21, 2018): 572–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy049.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
AbstractThis article utilizes van Gennep's neglected theory of territorial passages to answer two key questions in the study of ontological security (OS) in migration. First, why do the members of the receiving society lose their perceived sense of OS in face of a mass of strangers arriving at their gates? Second, how, if at all, do they attempt to reconstitute it while incorporating the strangers into their world? Following the recent call within OS studies in international relations (IR) to spell out the social mechanisms that facilitate the anxiety and uncertainty of the agents, I use the case of the German societal response to the 2015 refugee crisis to demonstrate that van Gennep's classical approach, far from being structural and functionalist, offers an advanced, power-informed, and processual perspective for uncovering a possible sociosymbolic mechanism behind the perceived “losing” and “re-finding” of OS in migratory encounters. The article delineates the principles of a “thick” approach to OS in migration, explains how van Gennep's theory adds to this approach, and highlights the ultimate unattainability of OS as an essentialist category that is either “present” or “absent” throughout the migratory encounter. It concludes by discussing the added value of van Gennep's theory to the study of OS in the contemporary global milieu of the “age of migration.”
5
Boulton, Jean. "Process Complexity." Complexity, Governance & Networks 7, no. 1 (May 2, 2022): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.20377/cgn-109.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
We develop the ontology of “process complexity” and describe how the dynamics of “becoming” can be framed as the emerging, stabilising, and ultimate dissolving of “patterns of relationships.” By extending traditional complexity thinking through introducing a “field theory” view, we develop a more nuanced and inclusive perspective of the processual complex world. We show how this leads to the idea of ontological uncertainty. We demonstrate how process complexity resonates with the ontologies of many different schools of thought including quantum gravity, the process philosophers of the Axial Age, and the early modern process philosophers impacted by Darwin’s theory of evolution, such as Bergson, Whitehead, and James. The remarkable alignment of these diverse perspectives from science and philosophy adds conviction and depth to the development of process complexity. We conclude by indicating how process complexity influences our approach to policy and management practice.
6
Gazit, Orit. "Corrigendum to “Van Gennep Meets Ontological (In)Security: A Processual Approach to Ontological Security in Migration”." International Studies Review 20, no. 3 (July 26, 2018): 546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/isr/viy061.
Повний текст джерела
7
Arshinov, Vladimir I., and Vladimir G. Budanov. "Processual Thinking in the Ontological and Epistemological context of Quantum Mechanics." Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences 62, no. 7 (October 10, 2019): 21–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.30727/0235-1188-2019-62-7-21-36.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The problem of commensurability/incommensurability of different cultural codes is a key problem of modern civilizational development. This is the problem of the search for communicative unity in the world of cultural and biological diversity, which has to be protected, and the search for the cohesion of different Umwelten, of semiotically-defined artificial and natural environments, of ecological and cognitive niches, taking into account that each of them has their own identity and uniqueness. The purpose of the article is to draw attention to the fact that the question of the so-called incommensurability of different conceptual schemes, paradigms, language consciousnesses is widely discussed not only in cross-cultural studies and philosophical problems of translation but also in connection with the problems of incommensurability (untranslatability) between the language of classical physics and the language of relativistic quantum physics. Attention is drawn to the problem of the incommensurability and correlation of different languages that are used in debates about the foundations of quantum mechanics, its interpretation, comprehension and ontology. Two approaches stand out in this debate. The first approach is based on the language of the formed being, on the language of things localized in time and on the logic of Aristotle. The second approach is based on the language of the becoming, process and nonlocality, on the search for various processual-oriented temporal logics. In this regard, we discuss the processual approach to understanding quantum mechanics, proposed in the philosophical and physical works of D. Bohm. The authors argue that (a) the experience of constructive understanding of the metaproblems of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, (b) the critical reception of the legacy of such philosophers of the process as Peirce, Bergson and Whitehead, (c) the deep reflection on the problems of commensurability/ incommensurability of linguistic consciousnesses of different cultures – will eventually create a common synergetic-interdisciplinary space of cooperation for the solutions of the above-mentioned issues.
8
Toyoshima, Fumiaki. "Roles and their three facets: A foundational perspective." Applied Ontology 16, no. 2 (April 27, 2021): 161–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/ao-210244.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Roles remain nebulous entities, notwithstanding their extensive interdisciplinary research. This paper argues through a meta-ontological conceptual tool of grounding that there are three key facets of roles: a role position, a role specification, and a role potential. A foundational perspective on roles can be specified by “role choices” as to which facet of roles is primary. Role choices are illustrated with theories of roles that are built in compliance with four well-known upper ontologies: GFO, DOLCE, BFO, and UFO. The relationship between such three facets of roles and the GFO-based three kinds of roles (relational, processual, and social) is closely examined. These three facets are also comparatively studied from linguistic (e.g. ‘have a role’ versus ‘play a role’) and methodological (realism versus conceptualism regarding ontology design) perspectives. Furthermore, the family resemblance view of roles as “epistemic trackers” is proposed: the general notion of role is merely (partially) unified by its three facets and helps to keep track of some entity with respect to its role-related aspects. Finally, defining characteristics of roles in conceptual modeling are considered in terms of the three-facet theory. This work provides the grist for future practical development of an ontological module for generic role representation.
9
Hayashi, Paulo, Gustavo Abib, Norberto Hoppen, and Lillian Daisy Gonçalves Wolff. "Processual Validity in Qualitative Research in Healthcare." INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing 58 (January 2021): 004695802110607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00469580211060750.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Knowledge development has been continuously challenging. Qualitative research seems to be promising; however, there are difficulties and complexities involved, one of which is validity. Qualitative research is based on different paradigms, ontologies, theories, and methods, and validity assessment may vary. We argue that processual validity can positively influence qualitative health care research. Processual validity is a methodological construction that involves all research steps, including those before and after data collection and analysis. We selected a processual validity model and two cases to illustrate its use and demonstrate processual validity’s importance and applicability. One case explores the gap between medical education and patients’ needs in primary health care. Other studies focus on health care improvements in hospitals. Our results highlight the benefits of processual validity to ensure the transparency and reliability of the research process and provide evidence of the findings to positively influence thinking and the execution of qualitative research in health care.
10
MacFarlane, Key. "A thousand CEOs." Progress in Human Geography 41, no. 3 (May 5, 2016): 299–320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0309132516644514.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The last 20 years have witnessed a deepening of the imbrication between capital and the university. This paper seeks to map one point at which this binding occurs: in critical theory. Recently scholars in strategic management have turned to processual and relational ontologies in an attempt to reimagine the logics of profit, value, and growth. These same ontologies have appealed to critical geographers as a means of reconceiving space as unfixed. Drawing on a case study of Deleuze’s appropriation in management literature, I show how such ontologies presuppose a vitalism that necessarily reproduces and obscures the structures of exploitation.
Дисертації з теми "Ontologia processuale"
1
Capoccia, Valerio <1976>. "La valorizzazione della conoscenza giuridica nelle banche dati della memoria: una ontologia informale degli eventi processuali per l’annotazione di fascicoli storico-giudiziari digitali." Doctoral thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017. http://amsdottorato.unibo.it/8249/1/capoccia_valerio_tesi.pdf.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Questa ricerca sviluppa un’analisi del processo di digitalizzazione di fondi archivistici costituiti da milioni di documenti, riproduzioni digitali degli archivi storici giudiziari di alcuni dei principali processi per strage e terrorismo della storia della Repubblica italiana. Saranno analizzati i principali aspetti giuridici di natura processuale penale, ed aspetti collegati all’accesso alle informazioni ed agli standard di descrizione archivistica. Verrà infine proposta una ontologia informale che descrive le principali entità del dominio di conoscenza analizzato ed una naming convention per l’assegnazione di URI univoci e persistenti alle unità documentarie dell’universo archivistico considerato.This research project focuses on an analysis of the digitalization process of the archive collections containing million documents, digital reproductions of the judicial historical files of some of the main massacre and terrorism trials in the history of the Italian republic. The paper deals with the major judicial aspects of procedural criminal nature and the ones linked to the access to information and to the archival description standards . The study also puts forward a proposal for an informal ontology describing the main entities of the analysed domain of knowledge and a naming convention for the assignment of univocal and long-lasting URI to the documentary units of the archival universe taken into account.
2
migliorini, damiano. "Ontologie Relazionali e Metafisica Trinitaria. Bilanci e Prospettive." Doctoral thesis, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11562/994268.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
La ricerca esamina la possibilità di formulare un teismo trinitario attraverso l’elaborazione di un’ontologia relazionale e una metafisica trinitaria, invocata sovente come soluzione ai dilemmi del teismo classico. A un Dio internamente molteplice e relazionale dovrebbe corrispondere – questa è l’ipotesi – un mondo in cui molteplicità e relazionalità siano un riflesso della natura trinitaria di Dio. L’indagine è stata compiuta su livelli differenti: si è valutato se la Trinità sia un paradigma efficace e le eventuali aporie che esso genera; si è cercato di comprendere se tale paradigma relazionale abbia un corrispettivo in ontologia. L’ontologia trinitaria-relazionale, infatti, è ancora più un auspicio che una realtà, nonostante esistano vari tentativi di formulare ontologie relazionali. Un bilancio di questi tentativi è tratteggiato attraverso cinque capitoli. Cap. 1: si è chiarito il ruolo della “relazione” nel sistema delle categorie ontologiche, esponendo una breve “storia della categoria di relazione” attraverso autori antichi, medievali e moderni. Individuare le categorie ontologiche è importante perché la loro diversa formulazione distingue la metafisica della sostanza da quella relazionale. Cap. 2: dall’incursione ‘storica’ è emersa la necessità di creare una tassonomia delle relazioni, descritta in questo secondo capitolo. Ciò consente di riferirsi, nelle argomentazioni, a tipi di relazioni e a caratteristiche dei diversi tipi. Cap. 3: si è esaminato il “regresso di Bradley” come regresso intra-oggettuale e infra-oggettuale. Questo secondo dispiega i suoi effetti quando applicato alla relazione di causa. Nel capitolo vengono prese in esame alcune posizioni sulla causalità e come essa debba essere intesa per poter formulare un’ontologia relazionale. Cap. 4: in questo capitolo viene analizzato il dibattito analitico contemporaneo sulla Trinità. La tesi esposta nel capitolo è che la Trinità rimane una teoria contraddittoria. Le “nove strategie” proposte mostrano però come tutti i teismi postulino qualcosa di simile al dogma trinitario: una forma di molteplicità e relazionalità trascendentali divine. Se ciò è vero, la Trinità è una scelta ragionevole, in mancanza di alternative meno contraddittorie. Cap. 5: si torna su questioni ontologiche, esaminando varie ontologie relazionali e la loro applicazione in filosofia della religione. Esse implicano relazioni trascendentali reali, le stesse usate per descrivere la Trinità. Esse sono, dunque, allo stesso tempo impossibili e inevitabili: ogni ontologia trasforma le entità o le relazioni in relazioni trascendentali reali. È impossibile sostituire la nozione di sostanza con la nozione di processo o relazione, sia nel parlare di Dio che nel parlare delle entità fondamentali. L’ipotesi avanzata è che la nozione di gunk-junk sia l’unica che possa tradurre la relazionalità fin qui cercata in un modello ontologico. La parte centrale del capitolo descrive dunque pregi e difetti di un’ontologia eventista-infinitesimante (EIO) basata sul gunk, e la sua fruibilità nel discorso teista. Ogni entità fondamentale è descritta tramite i trascendentali di entità, relazionalità, unità, molteplicità. EIO non elimina la sostanza, bensì la vuole pensare con il trascendentale della relazionalità. Se il gunk è la migliore ontologia che abbiamo, anche nel mondo abbiamo il mistero di una distinzione che non è divisione. Questo trova una spiegazione ultima nella metafisica teista (EIM): Dio crea in Sé e la sua sostanza trinitaria viene “circoscritta” dall’essenza degli enti. L’infinito di Dio fa spazio in Sé a qualcosa di nuovo. Le sostanze del mondo mantengono traccia della natura divina, pur nella Sua “contrazione”. EIO e EIM sono un compromesso tra relazionismo e sostanzialismo: pur se nell’apofaticità, su queste basi una filosofia trinitaria è possibile.
Книги з теми "Ontologia processuale"
1
Abbott, Andrew Delano. Processual Sociology. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Знайти повний текст джерела
2
Abbott, Andrew. Processual Sociology. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Знайти повний текст джерела
3
Abbott, Andrew. Processual Sociology. University of Chicago Press, 2016.
Знайти повний текст джерела
4
Dupré, John, and Daniel J. Nicholson. A Manifesto for a Processual Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0001.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This chapter argues that scientific and philosophical progress in our understanding of the living world requires that we abandon a metaphysics of things in favour of one centred on processes. We identify three main empirical motivations for adopting a process ontology in biology: metabolic turnover, life cycles, and ecological interdependence. We show how taking a processual stance in the philosophy of biology enables us to ground existing critiques of essentialism, reductionism, and mechanicism, all of which have traditionally been associated with substance ontology. We illustrate the consequences of embracing an ontology of processes in biology by considering some of its implications for physiology, genetics, evolution, and medicine. And we attempt to locate the subsequent chapters of the book in relation to the position we defend.
5
Nicholson, Daniel J. Reconceptualizing the Organism. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0007.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This chapter draws on insights from non-equilibrium thermodynamics to demonstrate the ontological inadequacy of the machine conception of the organism. The thermodynamic character of living systems underlies the importance of metabolism and calls for the adoption of a processual view, exemplified by the Heraclitean metaphor of the stream of life. This alternative conception is explored in its various historical formulations, and the extent to which it captures the nature of living systems is examined. Next, the chapter considers the metaphysical implications of reconceptualizing the organism from complex machine to flowing stream. What do we learn when we reject the mechanical and embrace the processual? Three key lessons for biological ontology are identified. The first is that activity is a necessary condition for existence. The second is that persistence is grounded in the continuous self-maintenance of form. And the third is that order does not entail design.
6
Bertolaso, Marta, and John Dupré. A Processual Perspective on Cancer. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0016.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This chapter attempts to illuminate the dynamic stability of the organism and the robustness of its developmental pathway by considering the biology of cancer. Healthy development and stable functioning of a multicellular organism require an exquisitely regulated balance between processes of cell division, differentiation, and death (apoptosis). Cancer involves a disruption of this balance, which results in unregulated cell proliferation. The thesis defended in this chapter is that the coupling between proliferation and differentiation, whether normal or pathological (as in cancer), is best understood within a process-ontological framework. This framework emphasizes the interactions and mutual stabilizations between processes at different levels and this, in turn, explains the difficulty in allocating the neoplastic process to any particular level (genetic, epigenetic, cellular, or histological). Understanding these interactions is likely to be a precondition of a proper understanding of how these mutual regulations are disrupted in the processes we call cancerous.
7
Fabris, Flavia. Waddington’s Processual Epigenetics and the Debate over Cryptic Variability. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198779636.003.0012.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This chapter reappraises Waddington’s processual theory of epigenetics and examines its implications for contemporary evolutionary biology. It focuses in particular on the ontological difference between two conflicting assumptions that have been conflated in the recent debate over the nature of cryptic variability: a substance view that is consistent with the modern synthesis and construes variability as a preexisting pool of random genetic variation; and a processual view, which derives from Waddington’s conception of developmental canalization and understands variability as an epigenetic process. The chapter also discusses how these opposing interpretations fare in their capacity to explain the genetic assimilation of acquired characters.
8
Kristensen, Anders R., Thomas Lopdrup-Hjorth, and Bent Meier Sørensen. Gilles Deleuze (1925–1995). Edited by Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, and Robin Holt. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0031.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Gilles Deleuze is a French philosopher known for his ontological thinking. In the field of organization studies, Deleuze is associated with postmodernism and post-structuralism along with fellow thinkers such as Jacques Derrida. This chapter examines Deleuze’s philosophical views and considers how processual thinking has emerged as an important area of research within organization and management studies. It first looks at Deleuze’s understanding of metaphysics and the creation of concepts, along with the connection between process organization studies and the creation of concepts. It then discusses the process ontology that exists within process organization studies in the context of process thinking. It also describes the new spirit of capitalism and its implications for contemporary management thought and highlights some individual cases in which a certain, perhaps Deleuzian, philosophy of organization is developed. The chapter concludes by arguing that the deployment of Deleuze’s philosophy in process organization studies should be more normative and pragmatic.
9
Tyler, Melissa. Simone De Beauvoir (1908–1986). Edited by Jenny Helin, Tor Hernes, Daniel Hjorth, and Robin Holt. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199669356.013.0025.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Simone de Beauvoir is widely acknowledged for her significant influence on feminist theory and politics during the twentieth century. However, her work remains largely neglected in organization studies despite the prevalence of themes such as Otherness, ethics, oppression and equality, dialectics, and subjectivity in her writing. Her best-known work, The Second Sex, focuses on the gendered organization of the desire for recognition. This chapter begins by considering de Beauvoir’s intellectual biography and discussing her writing in relation to other philosophers, particularly Jean-Paul Sartre. It examines major themes that recur throughout her work, especially the processual ontology underpinning her analysis of women’s situation and the process of becoming Other. It also explains the relevance of de Beauvoir’s philosophy to organization studies.
10
Gioia, Dennis A., and Aimee L. Hamilton. Great Debates in Organizational Identity Study. Edited by Michael G. Pratt, Majken Schultz, Blake E. Ashforth, and Davide Ravasi. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199689576.013.13.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Historically speaking, there have been a number of great debates in the organizational identity literature. Undoubtedly the most basic still is, “Is there such a thing as organizational identity?” This debate might best be characterized as an ontological debate. A second debate has to do with what can be known about the phenomenon. This epistemological debate has pitted various “camps” against each other. The three most prominent camps are the social actor, social construction, and institutional theory views on organizational identity. We suggest a conceptual pathway for reconciling these apparently competing views and furthering the research agenda for organizational identity. This chapter argues that despite the debated differences among these views, each largely depicts identity as “entitative.” Our proposed reconciliation centers on a fourth “processual” view on identity, that is, identity-as-flow.
Частини книг з теми "Ontologia processuale"
1
Broumas, Antonios. "The Ontology of the Intellectual Commons." In Intellectual Commons and the Law: A Normative Theory for Commons-Based Peer Production, 11–25. University of Westminster Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.16997/book49.b.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This chapter formulates a processual ontology of the intellectual commons, by examining the substance, elements, tendencies and manifestations of their being. The first part of the chapter introduces the various definitions of the concept, identifying the inherent elements and characteristics of the intellectual commons. Its second part focuses on the elements that constitute the totalities of the intellectual commons. Its third part emphasises their structural tendencies. Finally, the fourth and last part of the chapter deals with the various manifestations of the intellectual commons in the domains of culture, science and technology. Overall it proceeds by pointing out the tendencies and manifestations of the intellectual commons in the context of their dialectical interrelation with capital and commodity markets. This chapter is an analysis of the elements of personhood, work, value and community within the intellectual commons, which bear moral significance. It thus constitutes the ontological basis for the normative theory of the intellectual commons developed in the study.
2
Tsoukas, Haridimos. "Afterword." In The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenologies and Organization Studies, 707—C36.P73. Oxford University Press, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192865755.013.38.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract In this chapter, I attempt to show how phenomenology enables a richer (i.e. anti-dualist) account of organizational phenomena by enabling researchers to capture the logic of practice. By offering a more complex ontological understanding of agency (embodied, temporally structured, and embedded), phenomenologically informed organizational research enables us to see the multiple ways in which agents relate to the world. By according priority to being-in-the-world, as the primordial way of being, it offers a holistic ontological framework that focuses on relationality. By emphasizing enaction, it underlines the partly self-constitutive character of knowing through action. And by bringing out the non-successive character of temporality, it highlights the incessantly processual character of experience. I illustrate my account with examples from organizational research.
3
Berressem, Hanjo. "The Birth of Philosophy." In Gilles Deleuze's Luminous Philosophy, 21–48. Edinburgh University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474450713.003.0002.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The chapter focuses on the beginning of Deleuze’s career, charting his confrontation with Simondon, from whose work he takes the notion of crystal individuation. It then turns to Deleuze’s early reading of Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Stressing in particular Lucretius’ notion of the ‘light of Venus’, the chapter reads Deleuze’s luminous ontology against Thomas Nail’s argument that Lucretius’ work proposes a fluid and processual ontology. The chapter concludes that the ideas Deleuze distils from Lucretius concern a love of the multiplicity of the world and of life, and that Deleuzian philosophy is a response to the question of where Lucretius’ love of life and of a given multiplicity takes philosophy. Nowhere in Deleuze’s work is the positivity and affirmation that he finds in Lucretius put into question. All horrors are immanent to this more profound love of a multiplicitous life and light, which Deleuze also finds in Nietzsche and Bergson.
4
Dziadkowiec, Jakub. "Chapter 5: The Layered Structure of the World in N. Hartmann’s Ontology and a Processual View." In The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann, edited by Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio, and Frederic Tremblay. Berlin, Boston: DE GRUYTER, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110254181.95.
Повний текст джерела
5
Bruche-Schulz, Gisela. "Configuring a Concept - On Iteration and Infinity." In Mind and Matter - Challenges and Opportunities in Cognitive Semiotics and Aesthetics. IntechOpen, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100453.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The question asked in this paper concerns the relation between perception, the senses, and the human faculty of conceptualizing experiential values. I suggest that I came across data that exemplifies the transition from the sensing of an Umwelt to a conceptual grasp. The human faculty of conceptualizing experiential values obviously relies on experiential ontologies as a reference system. But the latter does not bring about the conceptualizing. The main question is then: How does conceptualizing work, and what is a concept? Do we know what conceptualizing is like? Do we know what thinking is? Of course, we experience the processual endpoints with words as convenient results. We seem to know how we learn words. Do we also know how we create their meanings? The meanings of iteration and infinity are in focus here. The passage from iteration to infinity is not defined by words. The distribution of response numbers seems to indicate that there is an underlying feeling, or sensing that enables, and accompanies, the understanding of a meaning.
6
Bugeaud, Florie, and Eddie Soulier. "Virtual Communities in a Services Innovation Context." In Virtual Community Building and the Information Society, 163–90. IGI Global, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-869-9.ch009.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This chapter focuses on both the activities of the telecoms’ innovators (i.e. actors of the innovation) and the emergence of some “service communities” which are interesting facets of virtual communities. These innovators are part of a remote and inter-professional network which forms a “design community”. They are involved in the telecom operators’ design process (opportunities research, service design, development, deployment and market launch). During the first stage, this community has to describe customers’ services situations, discover lacks and opportunities and find some ideas of adapted solutions. Theoretical and professional difficulties have been noted during this key step. The main problem is related to the concept of service which is a multidimensional and still poorly understood object. Based on the service literature and the emergent field of Service Science, we propose a theoretical framework and a semi-formal semantic method to describe, co-model (through a mereotopological ontology of assembled and interconnected scenes) and simulate (through an animation of each scenario) the targeted Services Systems. These Services Systems are configurations of dynamic/processual entities that reveal not only the service field of experiences but also the actors’ performances within different spatiotemporal situations.
Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Ontologia processuale"
1
Pires, Rilder S., Erneson A. Oliveira, Vitor F. Almeida, João A. Monteiro Neto, and Vasco Furtado. "Análise da ontologia dos assuntos jurídicos e suas respectivas legislações através de Redes Complexas." In Brazilian Workshop on Social Network Analysis and Mining. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação - SBC, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5753/brasnam.2022.223365.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Diversos esforços vem ocorrendo com o intuito de mitigar os efeitos da crescente complexidade inerente da Justiça brasileira. Nesse contexto, apresentamos uma abordagem baseada em Redes Complexas que relaciona assuntos jurídicos da Tabela Processual Unificada do primeiro grau da Justiça Federal do Conselho Nacional de Justiça. A partir de conceitos da Teoria de Grafos, identificamos grupos de assuntos e construímos uma rede bipartida de assuntos jurídicos e dispositivos legais. Ao analisarmos a projeção de um modo da rede bipartida no subconjunto dos assuntos jurídicos, verificamos uma forte tendência de assuntos do mesmo grupo compartilharem dispositivos legais entre si, o que resulta em um coeficiente de assortatividade de grupo r ≈ 0.62. Apesar disso, verificamos a presença de compartilhamento de dispositivos legais entre grupos específicos de assuntos jurídicos. Esse resultado, pode contribuir para a compreensão das relações existentes entre os assuntos jurídicos, bem como para a criação e aprimoramento de modelos de Inteligência Artificial que auxiliem em tarefas práticas do sistema judiciário brasileiro.