Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)":
Mazzeo, M. J., J. H. Ashtor, and S. Zyontz. "DO NPEs MATTER? NON-PRACTICING ENTITIES AND PATENT LITIGATION OUTCOMES." Journal of Competition Law and Economics 9, no. 4 (November 11, 2013): 879–904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/joclec/nht031.
Lemley, Mark A., and Robin Feldman. "Patent Licensing, Technology Transfer, and Innovation." American Economic Review 106, no. 5 (May 1, 2016): 188–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161092.
Sterzi, Valerio, Cecilia Maronero, Gianluca Orsatti, and Andrea Vezzulli. "Non-practicing entities in Europe: an empirical analysis of patent acquisitions at the European Patent Office." Industrial and Corporate Change, March 21, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae010.
Perel (Filmar), Maayan. "From Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) to Non-Practiced Patents (NPPs): A Proposal for a Patent Working Requirement." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2496281.
Huang, Kenneth G., Mei‐Xuan Li, Carl Hsin‐Han Shen, and Yanzhi Wang. "Escaping the patent trolls: The impact of non‐practicing entity litigation on firm innovation strategies." Strategic Management Journal, April 19, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.3606.
Gangopadhyay, Shubhashis, Aineas Mallios, and Stefan Sjögren. "Collusive Bidding, Competition Law, and Welfare." Review of Law & Economics, May 30, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rle-2022-0042.
Ganglmair, Bernhard, Christian Helmers, and Brian J. Love. "The Effect of Patent Litigation Insurance: Theory and Evidence from NPEs." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, August 15, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewab012.
Blogg, Jonathan. "The Myths and Facts of Patent Troll and Excessive Payment: Have Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) Been Overcompensated? - A Commentary." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3585073.
Minsk, Alan. "Implications of the Oil States and Christy, Inc. v. United States Decisions for the Possible Regulation of Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)." SSRN Electronic Journal, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3512237.
Дисертації з теми "Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs)":
Fahimi-Steingaeber, Ghesal. "The impact of non-practicing-entities (NPEs) on innovation an empirical analysis based on European sourced patients." Thesis, University of the West of Scotland, 2015. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.730016.
Maronero, Cecilia. "Innovation, Intellectual Property Rights and Non-Practicing Entities in the European Patent Market." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Bordeaux, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023BORD0488.
Patents are a form of intellectual property rights (IPRs) that are especially relevant to promoting innovative activities. A patent grants its owner a temporary exclusive right over inventions that are new, involve an inventive step and are susceptible of industrial application. Relying on this right, inventors can protect their ideas from imitation and gain an economic return from their investments in research and development (R&D). However, the use of patents has undergone a significant transformation, extending far beyond the traditional purpose of rewarding innovative efforts. Particularly in the field of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), patents are increasingly used as strategic tools (Blind, 2021). Moreover, over the past three decades, the sharp increase in the number of granted patents and the unprecedented flourishing of patent trading have paved the way for new intermediaries in the market for technology (Hagiu and Yoffie, 2013). Non-practicing entities (NPEs)—firms that do not use their patents in a traditional manufacturing sense, but primarily engage in licensing and enforcement—have emerged as prominent actors on the patent market (Golden, 2007; Feldman and Ewing, 2012). Also referred to as Patent Assertion Entities (PAEs), sometimes pejoratively called "patent trolls," NPEs have greatly polarized the academic and policy debate. Due to their non-manufacturing status, NPEs have unique advantages over operating companies. They are typically shielded from patent infringement counter-claims and have recently faced allegations of employing patent "hold-up" strategies (Lemley and Shapiro, 2007), which some argue it imposes a significant "tax on innovation" with potential negative effects on subsequent innovation (Chien, 2008). While NPEs have been extensively analyzed in the US patent market since their emergence in the early 2000s (Mezzanotti, 2021; Lemley and Zyontz, 2021), it is only recently that researchers have started to investigate their presence in the European technology market (Fusco, 2013; Love, 2013; Leiponen and Delcamp, 2019). This thesis aims to address these research gaps by examining the NPE phenomenon in the European patent marketplace. First, we extensively explore and analyze the literature on NPE business models by adopting a novel bibliometric approach guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol for systematic literature reviews. In addition, we will integrate three relevant NPE business models case studies. Second, we empirically investigate the presence of NPEs in the European patent market through a brand- new dataset of NPE patent filings and acquisitions at the European Patent Office (EPO). Furthermore, we develop an original taxonomy, thus categorizing NPEs into three business models: "Litigation," "Portfolio" and "Technology" NPEs. Finally, we empirically explore the interplay between the quality characteristics of the asserted patent and the propensity of NPEs to choose specific European jurisdictions where to initiate litigation (forum shopping)
Tang, Yu Ching, and 唐與菁. "The Comparative Analysis of Patent Litigation Risks Facing by Taiwan ICT Brand Enterprises from Their Practicing Entities (PEs) and Non-Practicing Entities (NPEs) Competitors–from the AMC perspective of Competitive Dynamics." Thesis, 2016. http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/handle/y3qz3f.
國立政治大學
科技管理與智慧財產研究所
104
Taiwanese manufacturers can’t stay away from the wars caused by global NPEs (Non-practicing entities) anymore. For the majority of domestic enterprises focusing on branding, they monitor and apply data mining of patent maps only at the competitors who are producing real products (herein called the term “practicing entities (PEs)” as opposed to “NPEs”). Since lacking experiences dealing with NPEs’ lawsuit attack, export-oriented domestic manufactures usually lose in lawsuit and their brand image being hurt. The damages are difficult to estimate. In view of this, the aim of this thesis provides an empirical study trying to compare with two kinds of plaintiff launched proceedings initiatively between PE competitors and NPEs being proficient in patent litigations but not familiar to Taiwanese brand enterprises. The study concludes that as a PE in launching litigation, the risk is lower if it transfer its patent to NPE or other PE that is not in the same industry and have them initiate the lawsuit. From the perspective of competitive dynamics, domestic enterprises must be more aware of monitoring NPEs’ activity while patent transaction from PEs to NPEs has been found because NPEs’ motivation to launch proceedings will significant increase.