Добірка наукової літератури з теми "New Zealand. Attorney-General"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "New Zealand. Attorney-General".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "New Zealand. Attorney-General"

1

Marchais, B. P. "Attorney General of New Zealand v. Mobil Oil New Zealand Ltd. et al." ICSID Review 2, no. 2 (September 1, 1987): 495–517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/2.2.495.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Cox, Charlie. "The Majestic Equality of Disenfranchisement: Assessing the Right to Freedom from Discrimination in Light of the Ngaranoa Litigation." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 51, no. 1 (June 22, 2020): 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v51i1.6517.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The right to freedom from discrimination in New Zealand is underpinned by equality, one of the most influential, yet amorphous principles in political theory. This article argues that the failure of New Zealand courts to articulate the norms behind the anti-discrimination guarantee enables arbitrary and inconsistent reasoning. The decisions of the High Court in Taylor v Attorney-General and the Court of Appeal in Ngaronoa v Attorney-General thus reflect a wrong turn in New Zealand discrimination law, taken in the case of Ministry of Health v Atkinson. Because discrimination law necessitates moral judgment, this article argues that the courts have been wrong to treat discrimination law as a largely amoral enterprise. Seen in this context, it should be unsurprising that the decisions of Taylor v Attorney-General and Ngaronoa v Attorney-General appear to mask moral judgments behind a façade of empiricism and common sense, and reveal different conceptions of equality.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Rulka, Marcin. "Nowa Zelandia: Wyrok Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 listopada 2022 r. w sprawie Make It 16 Incorporated vs. Attorney-General (dotyczący wieku uprawniającego do głosowania w wyborach), sygn. akt SC 14/2022." Przegląd Sejmowy 3(176) (2023): 195–297. http://dx.doi.org/10.31268/ps.2023.193.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In Make It 16 Incorporated vs. the Attorney-General, 21 November 2022, the Supreme Court of New Zealand ruled that existing legislation that does not allow people to vote in elections before the age of 18 is discriminatory because it is inconsistent with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, which guarantees citizens freedom from age discrimination after the age of 16. The New Zealand Supreme Court has issued a declaration of incompatibility in this regard. However, this does not oblige either the government or parliament to lower the voting age.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Adamson, J. "The University and the Profession." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 30, no. 2 (June 1, 1999): 357. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v30i2.6010.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This address was given at the Second Annual Legal Conference, held at Wellington, 3-5 April 1929. It followed an address by the then Attorney-General T K Sidey on legal education, an address which not only summarised the meagre nature of formal educational requirements to become a New Zealand lawyer, but directly compared them to that in the United States.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Geiringer, Claudia. "The Constitutional Role of the Courts under the NZ Bill of Rights: Three Narratives from Attorney-General v Taylor." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 48, no. 4 (December 1, 2017): 547. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v48i4.4727.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In Attorney-General v Taylor, New Zealand's Court of Appeal upheld the High Court's recognition, and exercise, of an implied jurisdiction to make (non-binding) declarations of legislative inconsistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (the NZ Bill of Rights). Recognition of this novel jurisdiction says something important about the evolution of judicial-legislative relations under the NZ Bill of Rights. The question is: what exactly? This article suggests that a close analysis of the Court of Appeal's decision in Taylor in fact discloses three interwoven narratives that speak to the constitutional role of the courts in enforcing the NZ Bill of Rights: the NZ Bill of Rights as "legal benchmark"; the NZ Bill of Rights as "facilitator of inter-branch dialogue"; and the "common law-fuelled bill of rights". The article unpicks these narratives, explores the relationship between them and discusses the extent to which they succeed in accommodating or justifying the new declaratory remedy.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Oakley, A. J. "Proprietary Claims and Their Priority in Insolvency." Cambridge Law Journal 54, no. 2 (July 1995): 377–429. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197300083707.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Two recent successful appeals to the Privy Council from the Court of Appeal of New Zealand have once again emphasised the importance of proprietary claims in conferring priority in insolvency over the claims of the general creditors of a bankrupt. Attorney-General for Hong Kong v. Reid1 concerned land in New Zealand purchased with the proceeds of bribes accepted by a Hong Kong Public Prosecutor as an inducement to exploit his official position to obstruct the prosecution of certain criminals. The Privy Council imposed a constructive trust where the Court of Appeal of New Zealand had, in accordance with precedent,2 denied one and thus enabled the Government of Hong Kong to recover the land in priority to any other creditors of the Public Prosecutor. In Re Goldcorp Exchange3 concerned the liquidation of a gold-dealer which had offered its purchasers the option of leaving their gold in its custody as “non-allocated bullion”.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Ryan, E. J. "Failing the System? Enfocing the Right to Education in New Zealand." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 35, no. 3 (October 1, 2004): 735. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v35i3.5712.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
At both the international and domestic level, the existence of a right to education is given widespread support. But what are the content and consequences of this right? The meaning of the right to education was examined recently in the context of special education by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Daniels v Attorney-General. The High Court saw the right as a substantive one; the Court of Appeal viewed it in procedural terms. These different conceptions of the right affected the remedies available to the plaintiffs. This article assesses the competing understandings of the education right in NZ, and concludes, particularly in light of the House of Lords' decision in Phelps v Hillingdon London Borough Council, that the High Court's approach is to be preferred.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Butler, Andrew S. "Strengthening the Bill of Rights." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 31, no. 1 (April 3, 2000): 129. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v31i1.5975.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article was presented as a Victoria University of Wellington Centennial Lecture during Law Festival week in 1999. The author critically examines two aspects of the current operational structure of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990—the subordination of the Bill of Rights to all enactments (section 4) and the issue of "positive vets" of proposed legislation by the Attorney-General (section 7). The author identifies them as weaknesses, and makes suggestions as to possible improvements.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Hickford, Mark. ""Settling Some Very Important Principles of Colonial Law": Three "Forgotten" Cases of the 1840's." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 35, no. 1 (April 1, 2004): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v35i1.5633.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article reintroduces the "forgotten" cases of R v Taylor, Attorney-General v Whitaker and Scott v Grace and considers their specific historical contexts. They raise controversial questions about the extent of the New Zealand governor's ability to grant lands outside of the provisions of local ordinances and imperial statutes by using the prerogative. The article notes the flow-on effects of the policy lacuna created by these judgments. The judgments of Justice Chapman and Chief Justice Martin caused considerable unease on the part of the colonial government and policy-makers in London as well as some New Zealand Company operatives. This in turn led to the subsequent legislative and policy efforts to qualify the reach of prerogative powers in colonies. The text of the cases is appended to this article.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Watt, Ella. "International Criminal Law and New Zealand Refugee Status Determinations: A Case Note on Attorney-General v Tamil X." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 43, no. 2 (July 2, 2012): 235. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v43i2.5033.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article considers Attorney-General v Tamil X, a recent New Zealand Supreme Court decision on refugee status determinations. Specifically, it considers the approach taken to art 1F of the Refugee Convention in decisions on the exclusion of claimants from refugee status. As claims are increasingly affected by art 1F considerations, it is imperative that the law in this complicated area is clear and just. This article traces Tamil X's advancement through the courts, and presents an analysis of the Supreme Court's judgment. The article also recommends some future developments for the jurisprudence on the exclusion clauses, specifically the adoption of a modified version of the ICTY jurisprudence on joint criminal enterprise.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Дисертації з теми "New Zealand. Attorney-General"

1

Rendell, Julia. "The Attorney General’s Obligation to Report Breaches of Rights in Proposed Legislation: How the Canadian and New Zealand Reporting Cultures Differ." Thesis, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/31405.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This paper examines the Attorney General’s obligation, in Canada and New Zealand, to report on inconsistencies in proposed legislation with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Although the obligations are similar, the Canadian and New Zealand Attorneys General have developed very different reporting cultures. The Canadian Attorney General has never issued a report; the New Zealand Attorney General has issued many. This paper’s thesis is that the different reporting cultures are attributable to the different constitutional structure in each jurisdiction and different understandings of the independence of the Attorney General. Under this analysis, the usefulness of comparative analysis between the two jurisdictions is limited: constitutional differences cannot be ignored. The paper evaluates proposed changes to the reporting obligation in each jurisdiction in light of this analysis.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "New Zealand. Attorney-General"

1

New Zealand. Parliament. Privileges Committee. Question of privilege concerning the defamation action Attorney-General and Gow v Leigh. [Wellington]: NZ House of Representatives, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Attorney-General, New Zealand. Report of the Attorney-General under the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 on the Misuse of Drugs (Classification of BZP) Amendment Bill 2007. Wellington, N.Z: House of Representatives, 2007.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Activism, feminism, politics and parliament. Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books Ltd, 2021.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "New Zealand. Attorney-General"

1

"State Immunity and the Application of Customary International Law in New Zealand: The Young v Attorney-General Litigation." In New Zealand Yearbook of International Law, 241–62. Brill | Nijhoff, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004423268_009.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Mann, F. A. "Free of Exchange." In Notes and Comments on Cases in International Law, Commercial Law, and Arbitration, 54–55. Oxford University PressOxford, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198257981.003.0017.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract The question before the Privy Council in National Mutual Life Association of Australasia v. Attorney-General for New Zealand, was, as Lord Reid put it when delivering the Board’s opinion, ‘difficult, but ... narrow in scope’. The appellants were the owners of New Zealand Inscribed Stock entered in the New Zealand Treasury’s register at Wellington and expressed in pounds, but marked ‘Principal and interest payable at Melbourne free of exchange’. Were the appellants entitled to New Zealand pounds or to Australian pounds? Their Lordships’ decision in favour of the latter view rested exclusively on the construction of the words ‘free of exchange’; this clause probably does not occur frequently and has no technical meaning, so that the implications of the decision are unlikely to be of wider impact. However, it is not without general interest.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії