Готові списки джерел за темами / Multi Stakeholder Negotiation

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 14 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Зміст

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation"

1

Susetyo, Cahyono, Harry Timmermans, and Bauke de Vries. "Orthogonal strategy based computer-mediated negotiation: Principles and example." Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 46, no. 6 (January 8, 2018): 1036–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2399808317748160.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Previous efforts to improve stakeholders’ involvement in planning and decision-making processes mostly put planners and decision makers as the ones who decide which solution is the best for the decision problems. In bottom-up planning and decision-making processes that supposedly involve stakeholders as much as possible, the most common practice is that when stakeholders have different preferences about the decision issues, supra decision makers such as planners and experts gather stakeholders’ preferences, and then, using their expertise and experience, decide what is the best choice for stakeholders. We approach the involvement of stakeholders in planning and decision-making not by relying on planners’ expertise but from a negotiation perspective. Previous works related to stakeholders’ negotiation mostly require stakeholders to engage in a face-to-face negotiation that seldom involves a computer system to improve the process. In this paper, we develop a negotiation system to support multi-issue and multi-stakeholder decision-making problems. In our approach, stakeholders do not directly interact with each other. Their proposals are submitted to a system that produces counter-proposals to reduce the differences among stakeholders’ proposals. Therefore, stakeholders do not exchange their preferences directly, but rather preference elicitations are mediated by the system. This approach is called computer-mediated negotiation. The system itself is based on the principle of an orthogonal strategy. Our computer-mediated negotiation protocol consists of two main phases. The first phase is the preference elicitation phase, which measures stakeholders’ utility functions. The second phase is the e-negotiation phase, in which stakeholders make their proposals and the computer system provides suggestions to improve them. To simulate real-world negotiations where stakeholders make proposals and counter-proposals in a series of negotiation rounds, we implemented the indifference curve approach to enable stakeholders to make incremental changes of their proposals during negotiation. The results from our experiment suggest that our method can produce an optimum solution for a multi-issue and multi-stakeholder decision problem by moving stakeholders’ proposals closer to one another.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

van Buuren, Arwin, and Jeroen Warner. "Multi-Stakeholder Learning and Fighting on the River Scheldt." International Negotiation 14, no. 2 (2009): 419–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180609x432888.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractThis article analyzes the history of conflict and cooperation on the river Scheldt. Dutch-Flemish relations over the shared Scheldt estuary go back for centuries. Only in the past 10 years has there been intensive negotiation on a joint vision for its future which takes the form of a cooperative multi-stakeholder platform incorporating public, private and NGO representatives. Yet, relations have not always been cooperative; negotiations have been tense at times. After discussing the merits of a learning- versus a fighting-oriented analysis and capturing its dynamics in a TWINS matrix, this study proposes an approach that combines collaboration with competition, or learning and fighting. The case analysis finds that relations were often conflictual and cooperative simultaneously and warns against undue optimism about the multi-stakeholder process on the Scheldt estuary.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Warner, Jeroen. "Multi-stakeholder platforms: integrating society in water resource management?" Ambiente & Sociedade 8, no. 2 (December 2005): 4–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1414-753x2005000200001.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Multi-Stakeholder Platforms are a currently popular concept in the international water world. It is however not a very well defined phenomenon. The present article unpacks the concept, proposes to see platforms as networks, and identifies two ´schools of thought´: social learning and negotiation. It attempts a preliminary typology of platforms encountered in real life, in which the Comités de Bacia in Brazil, for all their shortcomings, come out as a relatively influential type. In closing, the article then identifies reasons for non-participation, suggesting that it is an inevitable corollary of organised participation.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Chaloux, Annie, Stéphane Paquin, and Hugo Séguin. "Canada’s Multiple Voices Diplomacy in Climate Change Negotiations: A Focus on Québec." International Negotiation 20, no. 2 (April 27, 2015): 291–318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718069-12341311.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article sheds light on the complexity of international climate change negotiations in a federal country, like Canada, where there is no clear attribution of full power over international negotiation concerning this issue. Climate change is a multi-level and multi-stakeholder issue, one that can only be tackled successfully if all actors, at all levels of government, are involved in the process. In recent years, Canadian provinces, especially Québec, have become intensely involved in climate change paradiplomacy. That situation has led to a Canadian paradox where the Government of Québec worked to respect the Kyoto Protocol and act accordingly, while Canada opted out of the Protocol in 2011.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Kim, Dong-Young. "Understanding Integrated Environmental Assessment in a Multi-Stakeholder Negotiation via Role-Play." Simulation & Gaming 45, no. 1 (January 13, 2014): 125–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046878113517369.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

de Castro-Pardo, Mónica, and João C. Azevedo. "A Goal Programming Model to Guide Decision-Making Processes towards Conservation Consensuses." Sustainability 13, no. 4 (February 11, 2021): 1959. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13041959.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In this paper we propose a goal programming model that provides a consensual aggregated solution minimizing conflicts to guide multi-stakeholder decision-making processes and generates information regarding stakeholder groups to be exploited for negotiation purposes. This model permits to quantify variations in conflicts when the relative contribution of each criteria changes and gives insight to negotiation strategies with application in conservation areas. A dataset of a case study in the Meseta Ibérica Biosphere Reserve (Portugal-Spain) was used to test and validate the model. Fifty people belonging to four groups (scientists, government, farmers and businesspersons) assessed 20 management objectives in four dimensions: conservation, logistical support, development, and governance. The results showed the highest conflicts to be found for fauna and flora, education, and guarantees objectives while the most conflictive groups were scientists and farmers. The proposed model substantially reduced the global and intergroup conflicts associated to the same objectives, modelling the weights assigned to each objective in each dimension to find the most consensual/least conflictive solutions. This model can be a useful tool to improve complex decision-making processes in conservation areas with strong conflicts between stakeholders, such as transboundary biosphere reserves.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Michaud, Myriam, and Luc K. Audebrand. "Inside out, outside in: “supporting members” in multi-stakeholder cooperatives." Management Decision 57, no. 6 (June 10, 2019): 1382–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-01-2017-0042.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine multi-stakeholder cooperatives (MSCs), a relatively new and understudied type of cooperative, by focusing on the impact of a new member status: the “supporting member.” Supporting members are included in the ownership structure, participate in the decision-making process and contribute to the share capital without being formally defined as users of the cooperative’s services, an important disruption to the traditional cooperative venture. Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a qualitative study using in-depth interviews with 30 members (i.e. founders, managers, board members and employees) of 14 MSCs located in the Canadian province of Québec. Findings This study suggests that including supporting members in the cooperative venture impacts the three core features of cooperatives, which are traditionally user-owned, user-controlled and user-benefiting. Despite supporting members’ positive contributions to an MSC’s development and success, the inclusion of such members generates management challenges and organizational paradoxes. Social implications The inclusion of supporting members allows MSCs to become an experiment in “stakeholder democracy” and a space of negotiation between organizations, citizens and institutions, as MSCs represent and embody some of the community’s needs and desires. Originality/value This study constitutes an original contribution to paradox literature, as it describes the specific upward and downward spirals related to the inclusion of supporting members, highlights innovative responses to these paradoxes and extends understandings of cooperatives as hybrid organizations entangled in bundles of paradoxes.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Komendantova, Nadejda, Leena Marashdeh, Love Ekenberg, Mats Danielson, Franziska Dettner, Simon Hilpert, Clemens Wingenbach, Kholoud Hassouneh, and Ahmed Al-Salaymeh. "Water–Energy Nexus: Addressing Stakeholder Preferences in Jordan." Sustainability 12, no. 15 (July 31, 2020): 6168. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12156168.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The water and energy sectors are fundamentally linked. In Jordan, especially in the face of a changing climate, the water–energy nexus holds a number of challenges but also opportunities. A key point in exploring synergies is the identification of such, as well as the communication between the water and energy sectors. This paper promotes the importance of using a co-creative approach to help resolve opposing views and assessing stakeholder preferences in the context of the water–energy nexus in Jordan. A computer-supported, co-creative approach was used to evaluate stakeholder preferences and opinions on criteria and future scenarios for the energy and water sector in Jordan, identifying common difficulties and possibilities. The criteria describe socio-ecological aspects as well as techno-economic aspects for both systems. Discussing a set of preliminary scenarios describing possible energy and water futures ranked under a set of sector relevant criteria, a consensus between both stakeholder groups is reached. The robustness of results is determined, using a second-order probabilistic approach. The results indicate that there are no fundamental conflicts between the energy and water stakeholder groups. Applying a participatory multi-stakeholder, multi-criteria framework to the energy-water nexus case in Jordan promotes a clear understanding of where different stakeholder groups stand. This understanding and agreement can form the basis of a joint water–energy nexus policy used in the continued negotiation process between and within national and international cooperation, as well as promoting and developing acceptable suggestions to solve complex problems for both sectors.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Apperl, B., J. Andreu, T. P. Karjalainen, and M. Pulido-Velazquez. "Contribution of the Multi Attribute Value Theory to conflict resolution in groundwater management. Application to the Mancha Oriental groundwater system, Spain." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 11, no. 9 (September 12, 2014): 10235–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hessd-11-10235-2014.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract. The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive demands participatory water resource management approaches. Decision making in groundwater quantity and quality management is complex because of the existence of many independent actors, heterogeneous stakeholder interests, multiple objectives, different potential policies, and uncertain outcomes. Conflicting stakeholder interests have been often identified as an impediment to the realization and success of water regulations and policies. The management of complex groundwater systems requires clarifying stakeholders' positions (identifying stakeholders preferences and values), improving transparency with respect to outcomes of alternatives, and moving the discussion from the selection of alternatives towards definition of fundamental objectives (value-thinking approach), what facilitates negotiation. The aims of the study are to analyse the potential of the multi attribute value theory for conflict resolution in groundwater management and to evaluate the benefit of stakeholder incorporation in the different stages of the planning process to find an overall satisfying solution for groundwater management. The research was conducted in the Mancha Oriental groundwater system (Spain), subject to an intensive use of groundwater for irrigation. A complex set of objectives and attributes were defined, and the management alternatives were created by a combination of different fundamental actions, considering different implementation stages and future changes in water resources availability. Interviews were conducted with representative stakeholder groups using an interactive platform, showing simultaneously the consequences of changes of preferences to the alternative ranking. Results show that the acceptation of alternatives depends strongly on the combination of measures and the implementation stages. Uncertainties of the results were notable but did not influence heavily on the alternative ranking. The expected reduction of future groundwater resources by climate change increases the conflict potential. The implementation of the method to a very complex case study, with many conflicting objectives and alternatives and uncertain outcomes, including future scenarios under water limiting conditions, illustrate the potential of the method for supporting management decisions.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Apperl, B., M. Pulido-Velazquez, J. Andreu, and T. P. Karjalainen. "Contribution of the multi-attribute value theory to conflict resolution in groundwater management – application to the Mancha Oriental groundwater system, Spain." Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 19, no. 3 (March 9, 2015): 1325–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1325-2015.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Abstract. The implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive demands participatory water resource management approaches. Decision making in groundwater quantity and quality management is complex because of the existence of many independent actors, heterogeneous stakeholder interests, multiple objectives, different potential policies, and uncertain outcomes. Conflicting stakeholder interests have often been identified as an impediment to the realisation and success of water regulations and policies. The management of complex groundwater systems requires the clarification of stakeholders' positions (identifying stakeholder preferences and values), improving transparency with respect to outcomes of alternatives, and moving the discussion from the selection of alternatives towards the definition of fundamental objectives (value-thinking approach), which facilitates negotiation. The aims of the study are to analyse the potential of the multi-attribute value theory for conflict resolution in groundwater management and to evaluate the benefit of stakeholder incorporation into the different stages of the planning process, to find an overall satisfying solution for groundwater management. The research was conducted in the Mancha Oriental groundwater system (Spain), subject to intensive use of groundwater for irrigation. A complex set of objectives and attributes was defined, and the management alternatives were created by a combination of different fundamental actions, considering different implementation stages and future changes in water resource availability. Interviews were conducted with representative stakeholder groups using an interactive platform, showing simultaneously the consequences of changes in preferences to the alternative ranking. Results show that the approval of alternatives depends strongly on the combination of measures and the implementation stages. Uncertainties in the results were notable, but did not influence the alternative ranking heavily. The expected reduction in future groundwater resources by climate change increases the conflict potential. The implementation of the method in a very complex case study, with many conflicting objectives and alternatives and uncertain outcomes, including future scenarios under water limiting conditions, illustrates the potential of the method for supporting management decisions.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation"

1

Whiteley, Adrienne Lynn. "The negotiation of power in a multi-stakeholder participation process : a case study of the inclusiveness and effectiveness of an incipient inner city neighbourhood council." 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/1993/12263.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation"

1

Leiss, William. Multi-stakeholder negotiation in environmental controversies: The case of antisapstain chemicals in the British Columbia wood products industry. Waterloo, Ont: Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Klein, Julie Thompson. Beyond Interdisciplinarity. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197571149.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Beyond Interdisciplinarity examines the broadening meaning, heterogeneity, and boundary work of interdisciplinarity. It includes both crossdisciplinary work (encompassing multi-, inter-, and trans-disciplinary forms) as well as cross-sector work (spanning disciplines, fields, professions, government and industry, and communities in the North and South). Part I defines boundary work, discourses of interdisciplinarity, and the nature of interdisciplinary fields and interdisciplines. Part II examines dynamics of working across boundaries, including communicating, collaborating, and learning in research projects and programs, with a closing chapter on failing and succeeding along with gateways to literature and other resources. The conceptual framework is based on an ecology of spatializing practices in transaction spaces, including trading zones and communities of practice. Boundary objects, boundary agents, and boundary organizations play a vital role in brokering differences for platforming change in contexts ranging from small projects to new fields to international initiatives. Translation, interlanguage, and a communication boundary space are vital to achieving intersubjectivity and collective identity, fostering not only pragmatics of negotiation and integration but also reflexivity, transactivity, and co-production of knowledge with stakeholders beyond the academy. Rhetorics of holism and synthesis compete with instrumentalities of problem solving and innovation as well as transgressive critique. Yet typical warrants today include complexity, contextualization, collaboration, and socially robust knowledge. The book also emphasizes the roles of contextualization and historical change while accounting for the shifting relationship of disciplinarity and interdisciplinarity, the ascendancy of transdisciplinarity, and intersections with other constructs, including Mode 2 knowledge production, convergence, team science, and postdisciplinarity.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Частини книг з теми "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation"

1

Paulsson, Andreas, and Aron Larsson. "Survey-Based Multi-stakeholder Preference Elicitation with Relatively Incomplete and Possibly Disjoint Rank Orderings." In Contemporary Issues in Group Decision and Negotiation, 27–40. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77208-6_3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Schut, Marc, Cees Leeuwis, Murat Sartas, Luis Alejandro Taborda Andrade, Jacob van Etten, Anna Muller, Thierry Tran, Arnaud Chapuis, and Graham Thiele. "Scaling Readiness: Learnings from Applying a Novel Approach to Support Scaling of Food System Innovations." In Root, Tuber and Banana Food System Innovations, 71–102. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92022-7_3.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AbstractScaling of innovations is a key requirement for addressing societal challenges in sectors such as agriculture, but research for development programs struggles to make innovations go to scale. There is a gap between new complexity-aware scientific theories and perspectives on innovation and practical approaches that can improve strategic and operational decision-making in research for development interventions that aim to scale innovations. To bridge this gap, Scaling Readiness was developed. Scaling Readiness is an approach that encourages critical reflection on how ready innovations are for scaling in a particular context for achieving a particular goal and what appropriate actions could accelerate or enhance scaling to realize development outcomes. Scaling Readiness provides decision support for (1) characterizing the innovation and innovation system; (2) diagnosing the current readiness and use of innovations; (3) developing strategies to overcome bottlenecks for scaling; (4) facilitating multi-stakeholder negotiation and agreement; and (5) navigating the implementation process. This chapter explains how Scaling Readiness was used in the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB) and describes how Scaling Readiness informed the design and management of the RTB Scaling Fund, an instrument for identifying and nurturing scaling-ready innovations. We introduce the key principles and concepts of Scaling Readiness and provide a case study of how Scaling Readiness was applied for scaling a cassava flash dryer innovation in different countries in Africa and Central America. The chapter concludes with a reflection and recommendations for the further improvement and use of Scaling Readiness.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Choudhury, Nirmalya. "Towards Responsible Hydropower Development through Contentious Multi-stakeholder Negotiations: The Case of India." In Evolution of Dam Policies, 95–129. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23403-3_4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Rathore, M. S. "Multi-stakeholder Negotiating Platforms for Effective Water Governance: A Case of Mashi Basin, Rajasthan, India." In Water Security in Asia, 567–79. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54612-4_42.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Briot, Jean-Pierre, Marta de Azevedo Irving, José Eurico Vasconcelos Filho, Gustavo Mendes de Melo, Isabelle Alvarez, Alessandro Sordoni, and Carlos José Pereira de Lucena. "Participatory Management of Protected Areas for Biodiversity Conservation and Social Inclusion." In Advances in Computational Intelligence and Robotics, 295–332. IGI Global, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1756-6.ch013.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
The objective of this paper is to reflect on our experience in a serious game research project, named SimParc, about multi-agent support for participatory management of protected areas for biodiversity conservation and social inclusion. Our project has a clear filiation with the MAS-RPG methodology developed by the ComMod action-research community, where multi-agent simulation (MAS) computes the dynamics of the resources and role-playing game (RPG) represents the actions and dialogue between stakeholders about the resources. We have explored some specific directions, such as: dialogue support for negotiation; argumentation-based decision making and its explanation; technical assistance to the players based on viability modeling. In our project, multi-agent based simulation focuses on the negotiation process itself, performed by human players and some artificial participants/agents, rather than on the simulation of the resources dynamics. Meanwhile, we have also reintroduced the modeling of the socioecosystem dynamics, but as a local technical assistance/analysis tool for the players.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Hennebry, Jenna, and Nicola Piper. "Global migration governance and migrant rights advocacy: the flexibilization of multi-stakeholder negotiations." In Research Handbook on the Law and Politics of Migration, 369–83. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781789902266.00038.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation"

1

Ross, Adam, Hugh McManus, Donna Rhodes, and Daniel Hastings. "Role for Interactive Tradespace Exploration in Multi- Stakeholder Negotiations." In AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2010-8664.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Також вас можуть зацікавити розширені добірки на тему "Multi Stakeholder Negotiation" для конкретних типів джерел:
Статті в журналах
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії