Дисертації з теми "Moral foundation theory"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-26 дисертацій для дослідження на тему "Moral foundation theory".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте дисертації для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
Goldstein, Daniel M. (Daniel Michael). "Medicine as practical wisdom : an old foundation for a new way of thinking in biomedical ethics." Thesis, McGill University, 1989. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=22372.
Повний текст джерелаBurgoon, Jacob N. "The Moral Foundations of Teaching: Measuring Teachers' Implicit Moral Beliefs." University of Toledo / OhioLINK, 2018. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1544787174462244.
Повний текст джерелаWilson-Hart, Jessica H. "Culture Wars: Explaining Congressional Partisanship and Organizational Dysfunction Through Moral Foundations Theory." ScholarWorks, 2016. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/2244.
Повний текст джерелаPagano, Dario. "Diritti naturali e Diritti Umani." Thesis, Paris 10, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015PA100036/document.
Повний текст джерелаThe aim of this work concerns the relation between human rights and natural rights, in order to understand if human rights are those natural rights affirmed in the modern age. First of all, we analyse the contemporary conceptions about human rights nature, especially those which find their meaning from ontological positions. Secondly, we reconstruct the term of this comparison from three perspectives : the idea of natural rights, the concept of natural rights, the theories of natural rights. At last, after the individuation of relevants aspects between both categories, we compare them, highlighting the common points and the differences that separate their path
Sinclair, Neil Stuart. "Propositional clothing and moral content : the foundations of expressivism as a meta-ethical theory." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2006. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.613844.
Повний текст джерелаBlahunka, Natalie Jane. "The Impact of Intentions and Omissions On Moral Judgments Across Domains." Thesis, Boston College, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:102257.
Повний текст джерелаThesis advisor: James Dungan
Moral psychologists disagree over whether descriptively different moral violations represent distinct cognitive domains or are in fact unified by common cognitive mechanisms. The Moral Foundations Theory (MFT; Haidt, 2007) offers five different domains of moral transgressions: Harm/Care, Fairness/Reciprocity, Ingroup/Loyalty, Authority/Respect, and Purity/Sanctity. Both intentionality and omission bias (e.g. omissions such as letting someone die being judged less harshly than actions such as killing someone) have been shown to impact moral judgments; however, it remains unclear how these rules modulate judgments across moral transgressions of various types. Here, we investigate the role of intentionality and omission bias across different moral violations to determine if the divide between moral domains represent true cognitive, (as opposed to descriptive), differences. We utilized a 2 x 2 x 5 design to create stories across the 5 domains posited by MFT that were intentional/accidental cases of actions/omissions. Importantly, this study also looks at four distinct moral judgments of wrongness, responsibility, blameworthiness, and punishment to assess the role of these rules across judgments. We found that intent and action play different roles across judgments, particularly when comparing wrongness and punishment. Intent seems to matter more for wrongness, whereas action matters more for punishment. Further, these rules also differ across domains. We found that intent matters more for the individualizing foundations of harm and fairness (versus the binding foundations of ingroup, authority, and purity) in judgments of wrongness and punishment. The difference between action and omission is also more important for the individualizing foundations for punishment. These data suggest intentionality and omission bias manifest themselves uniquely across moral judgments and domains and provide evidence that there are meaningful differences between domains
Thesis (BS) — Boston College, 2014
Submitted to: Boston College. College of Arts and Sciences
Discipline: College Honors Program
Discipline: Psychology Honors Program
Discipline: Psychology
Araujo, Marcelo de. "Scepticism, freedom and autonomy : a study of the moral foundations of Descartes' theory of knowledge /." Berlin : W. de Gruyter, 2003. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb39088570r.
Повний текст джерелаMalone, Christopher David. "The foundations of international political virtue." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2013. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:0f14f2a6-0d49-4c8d-8ebb-cb5af2cc444d.
Повний текст джерелаRampy, Nolan. "Intuitions or Informational Assumptions? An Investigation of the Psychological Factors Behind Moral Judgments." ScholarWorks @ UVM, 2015. http://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/446.
Повний текст джерелаHurst, Kristin Frances. "Identity, Intergroup Relationships, and Environmental Conflict." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/89333.
Повний текст джерелаDoctor of Philosophy
This dissertation explores strategies for addressing identity-related barriers to environmental problem-solving through the lens of two social-psychological theories: self-affirmation theory and moral foundations theory. Through one theoretical review, two online experiments and one in-lab experiment I explore, integrate and test theoretically grounded strategies for reducing the defensive information processing that can exacerbate intergroup divisions in multi-stakeholder settings. The specific objectives of this dissertation are to 1) integrate self-affirmation theory and moral foundations theory into the current knowledge about collaborative conservation (Chapter 2), 2) evaluate ways of tailoring environmental communication to better reach socially and politically diverse audiences (Chapter 3), and 3) experimentally test the effectiveness of an approach, based on self-affirmation theory, to facilitate productive discussion of complex, value-laden issues in group settings. Before presenting the results of this work, I provide a broad overview of the problem of group-based divisions in environmental conflict and the theoretical underpinnings of the dissertation (Chapter 1). Finally, I summarize the results and discuss the broader implications of the research (Chapter 5). The results of this research offer initial insights into how tools grounded in these theories can most effectively be applied to help alleviate identity-based barriers to environmental problem-solving.
Courteau, Solange. "Explorer la moralité canadienne par le biais des plaintes concernant le contenu radio-télédiffusé." Thesis, Université d'Ottawa / University of Ottawa, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10393/39380.
Повний текст джерелаNeri, Marc P. "Loyalty and Fairness: A Study of the Influence of Moral Foundations on Auditors' Propensity to Subordinate their Judgment." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2016. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc955066/.
Повний текст джерелаBaghdassarian, Anoush. "Negotiating Human Rights Abuses through the Moral Foundations Theory: An Attempt to Understand the Moral Motivations behind the Male Guardianship System in Saudi Arabia, Female Genital Modification, and Child Marriage." Scholarship @ Claremont, 2017. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1473.
Повний текст джерелаGabhart, Elizabeth Anne. "Religiousness and Spirituality: How Are They Related to Moral Orientations?" Thesis, University of North Texas, 2017. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1011767/.
Повний текст джерелаDias, Rodrigo da Silva. "Political views, morality, and attitudes toward marijuana legalization." reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10438/24098.
Повний текст джерелаApproved for entry into archive by ÁUREA CORRÊA DA FONSECA CORRÊA DA FONSECA (aurea.fonseca@fgv.br) on 2018-05-18T21:03:48Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertation - Rodrigo Dias.pdf: 1200543 bytes, checksum: 55982ff5b80c53cb3762bce772efae63 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2018-06-15T12:25:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Dissertation - Rodrigo Dias.pdf: 1200543 bytes, checksum: 55982ff5b80c53cb3762bce772efae63 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-18
In this paper, we examine why attitudes toward marijuana legalization are split along ideological lines. In a survey, we found that conservatives were more likely to oppose this policy partly because of their greater reliance on the authority and purity foundations of morality. Curiously, concerns about harm were found to play no role in determining attitudes toward marijuana legalization, even though those who were against this policy frequently explained their views with harm-related accounts. In an experiment, we found that opponents of legalization were more likely to adopt a more favorable view towards it when exposed to arguments and sources that were consistent with the authority and purity dimensions of morality. Precisely, subjects who initially opposed legalization were more likely to change their attitudes when exposed to arguments that were based on the purity (vs. harm) foundation of morality, and when they were led to believe that these arguments were given by religious (vs. business) leaders.
Hammerton, Matthew. "Agent-Relativity and the Foundations of Moral Theory." Phd thesis, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/117207.
Повний текст джерелаWoolley, Michaela Leigh. "Moral sense and moral imperative : an analysis of the biological foundations of morality and their implications for moral theory." Thesis, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/14627.
Повний текст джерелаDawson, Jessica. "Errors in Judgement: How Status, Values, and Moral Foundations Influence Moral Judgments of Guilt and Punishment." Diss., 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10161/13393.
Повний текст джерелаThis study investigates how actor status, moral foundations theory and Schwartz values influence the moral judgments of guilt and punishment. I argue that to understand individual values consequences for actions, they must be considered within organizational values and larger institutional logics frameworks. Building off Zerubavel’s conception of a three level cognition (Zerubavel 1999), I argue for a tri level conception of values and morality in order to more fully understand how moral judgements work as well as the social context in which they are shaped. Using original research, I offer evidence of three levels of morality. First, I evaluate actor status on judgments of guilt and punishment. I then evaluate individual moral culture using Schwartz Values (Schwartz 2012; Vaisey and Miles 2014). I evaluate the impact of the organization on moral culture measure through the use of status hierarchies (Sauder, Lynn, and Podolny 2012). Finally, I evaluate broader cultural morality using Moral Foundations Theory (Graham et al. 2016; Kesebir and Haidt 2010). Taken together, these three levels of morality present a more ecologically valid understanding of the ways in which moral culture works from the individual, through the meso-social level and to the broader culture. I demonstrate the complex ways in which moral judgments are influenced by universal concerns, organizational influences and individual characteristics. I find that moral foundations theory conceptions of harm does not predict judgments of guilt and punishment but that Schwartz Values do influence these moral judgments. I also find that it is the actor status that most strongly predicts the outcomes of guilt and punishment. The research provides a foundation for future research of how actor status influences moral judgments of guilt and punishment beyond the limited moral community of the current study.
Dissertation
Souza, Isabela Hazin Antunes de. "Testing Moral Argument Theory in a developing country: a study of moral opinion dynamics in Brazil." Master's thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/92205.
Повний текст джерелаComo a opinião pública em relação à questões morais muda ao longo do tempo é um tópico de pesquisa enigmático. A Teoria do Argumento Moral, sugerida por Eriksson e Strimling (2015) e Strimling et al. (2019), propõe que, entre duas posições opostas (e.g., “a favor” e “contra” o casamento homossexual), aquela mais fortemente respaldada por argumentos que giram em torno do cuidado, justiça, e liberdade é a que está ganhando apoio popular com o tempo. Além do mais, quanto maior a diferença entre posições opostas em relação à quão bem elas são respaldadas por estes argumentos, mais rápido a opinião pública muda em direção à posição com maior respaldo. Estudos anteriores demonstraram que a Teoria do Argumento Moral prevê de forma satisfatória a dinâmica da opinião moral tanto nos E.U.A. quanto no Reino Unido. O presente trabalho teve como objetivos: estudar o alcance desta teoria, investigando, para isto, se a mesma também é capaz de prever as mudanças na opinião moral ocorridas no Brasil, um país que difere dos E.U.A. e do Reino Unido tanto economica quanto culturalmente; e adaptar a metodologia empregada em estudos anteriores à realidade de países em desenvolvimento, onde dados relacionados à questões morais não estão prontamente disponíveis. As questões analisadas aqui foram retiradas de pesquisas de opinião pública conduzidas no Brasil pelo menos duas vezes. Tendências temporais relativas à popularidade das posições morais foram construídas a partir dos dados coletados por tais pesquisas, enquanto que medidas da conexão das posições com argumentos morais foram obtidas a partir de um questionário online. Não obstante o uso de uma metodologia mais flexível, os resultados encontrados aqui corroboram resultados anteriores: também no Brasil a força – relativa – de conexão de uma posição com argumentos universais prevê se a mesma está ganhando popularidade com o passar do tempo, e a velocidade com a qual a opinião públic muda em direção a ela. O presente trabalho fornece evidências de que a Teoria do Argumento Moral é de fato capaz de prever mudanças na opinião moral em qualquer país, contanto que o mesmo possua liberais em sua população e liberdade de expressão. Ao fazer isto, este estudo ajuda a iluminar os questionamentos ao redor da dinâmica da opinião moral.
How public opinion on moral issues (e.g., legalization of same-sex marriage) changes through time is a puzzling research topic. The Moral Argument Theory of Opinion Dynamics, suggested by Eriksson and Strimling (2015) and Strimling et al. (2019), proposes that, between opposing issue positions (e.g., “for” and “against” same-sex marriage), the one more strongly supported by harm, fairness and liberty arguments is the one gaining public support over time. Furthermore, the greater the difference between opposing positions in how well they are supported by these arguments, the faster public opinion moves towards the position with such support. Previous studies have shown that the Moral Argument Theory successfully predicts moral opinion trends in the U.S. and the U.K. The present work sought to study the scope of the Moral Argument Theory by investigating whether it also predicts how public opinion on moral issues changes in Brazil, a country that differs from the U.S. and the U.K. from both an economic and a cultural perspective. It also sought to adapt the methodology employed by previous studies to the reality of developing countries, where data on moral issues are less readily available. The set of moral issues analyzed here were retrieved from public opinion polls that had been conducted in Brazil more than two times. Time trends regarding the popularity of moral positions were constructed from the data collected by such polls, while measures of positions’ connection with moral arguments were obtained through the application of an online questionnaire. Notwithstanding the use of a more flexible methodology, the results found here corroborate previous findings: also in Brazil the relative strength of a moral position’s connection with harm, fairness and liberty arguments predicts whether it is gaining popularity over time, and the speed with which public opinion moves towards it. The present work provides evidence that the Moral Argument Theory might indeed be able to predict moral opinion change in any country, as long as it has liberals in its population and freedom of speech. And, by doing so, it helps shed light on the puzzles surrounding the dynamics of moral opinion.
"The Association between the Moral Foundations Theory, Ethical Concern and Fast Food Consumption." Master's thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2286/R.I.16457.
Повний текст джерелаDissertation/Thesis
M.S. Nutrition 2013
Pšenčný, Tomáš. "Volby a morálka: teorie morálních základů Jonathana Haidta a analýza volebních výsledků parlamentních stran ČR v roce 2017." Master's thesis, 2020. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-436297.
Повний текст джерелаZúquete, Mafalda Patacão. "The morality of political speech in parliamentary debates: an analysis of parliamentary party dynamics, based on what they say and how they say it." Master's thesis, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/134081.
Повний текст джерелаMoral Foundations Theory (MFT) is an area of study with multiple and varied applications, including political science. Indeed, many studies have denoted that part of the reason for the deepening divide between American liberals and conservatives is due to the fact that both of these groups rely on fundamentally different moral principles. While this research has started to pan outside of the United States of America, it has yet to be applied to the context of the Portuguese republic, which differs from the American political reality. Portugal’s democracy is built on top of a multi-party system, and conventional wisdom divides it into a right and left wing, rather than liberal and conservative. As such, we developed a Moral Foundations Dictionary (MFD) in European Portuguese and analyzed 10 years’ worth of transcripts from parliamentary sessions through the prism of MFT, in an effort to find out which are the parliamentary dynamics in Portuguese political speech. Indeed, we found evidence that the Portuguese political parties place themselves on a right/left wing spectrum when looked at through the lens of MFT, but also that there appears to be a government/opposition dichotomy at play, which could affect party dynamics.
A Teoria dos Fundamentos Morais é uma área de estudo com múltiplas e variadas aplicações, incluindo no campo da ciência política. De facto, vários estudos notaram que parte da razão pela qual a divisão entre liberais e conservadores nos Estados Unidos da América (EUA) se tem vindo a aprofundar deve-se ao facto de que estes grupos têm por base princípios morais fundamentalmente diferentes. Embora esta pesquisa se tenha começado a expandir para além dos EUA, tem ainda de ser aplicada no contexto da república portuguesa, que difere da realidade política americana. A democracia portuguesa baseia-se num sistema multipartidário e a convenção geral dita que os partidos se dividem como sendo de direita ou esquerda, em vez de liberais ou conservadores. Deste modo, desenvolvemos um Dicionário de Fundamentos Morais em português europeu e analisámos 10 anos de transcrições do diário da assembleia da república pelo prima da Teoria dos Fundamentos Morais, numa tentativa de descobrir as dinâmicas parlamentares do discurso moral português. De facto, descobrimos evidências de que os partidos políticos portugueses se encontram num eixo direita/esquerda quando são analisados pela lente da Teoria dos Fundamentos Morais, mas também aparenta existir uma dinâmica governo/oposição, que afeta também a forma como os partidos se relacionam.
Bezerra, Ana Helena Nunes. "O julgamento moral na psicopatia: sujeitos recluídos." Master's thesis, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/37553.
Повний текст джерелаA presente investigação estabelece como objetivo, com base na Moral Foundations Theory e no agrupamento das cinco fundações morais existentes, perceber quais os maiores défices do sujeito psicopata. Além disso, são posteriormente comparados os scores do grupo de indivíduos considerados psicopatas e do grupo que não apresenta essas características. O grupo de participantes é constituído por 105 indivíduos, sendo que 27 apresentam características psicopáticas e os restantes 78 integram o grupo dos não psicopatas. Os instrumentos basearam-se na versão de investigação do Moral Foundations Questionnaire – acompanhado de um questionário sociodemográfico - e da Escala de Psicopatia – PCL-R, cotada através de dados arquivados. No que concerne aos resultados obtidos, nenhuma das hipóteses predefinidas obteve resultados estatisticamente significativos, no entanto os valores encontrados podem permitir a inferência de algumas conclusões como ponto de partida. Assim, não foram encontradas diferenças entre psicopatas e não psicopatas ao nível do julgamento moral, ainda que os indivíduos que apresentam estas características tenham mostrado uma pontuação mais baixa. Desta forma, será possível inferir que, efetivamente, apesar do sujeito psicopata apresentar uma diminuição nas suas capacidades morais, o mesmo é capaz de realizar de forma relativamente adequada este tipo de julgamentos mesmo que, posteriormente, não os integre no seu código de conduta.
The following investigation aims to understand, using Moral Foundations Theory and the cluster of the five moral foundations, which are the biggest deficits on the psychopath individual. Besides that, we will compare the scores of the group of individuals considered psychopaths and the group that does not display those features. The group of participants had 105 individuals, 27 display psychopath features and 78 do not have those same features. The instruments were based on the research version of Moral Foundations Questionnaire – along with a socio demographic questionnaire and the PCL – R, scored by file data. About the results, none of the hypothesis pre-defined got significant statistically results, but these results allow us to infer some initial conclusions. Therefore, we could not find differences between psychopaths and non-psychopaths when it comes to the moral judgment, although individuals with those characteristics have displayed a lower score. Thereby, it is possible to infer that, effectively, despite the fact that the psychopath individual presents a decrease in their moral capacities, the same can perform, in a relatively adjusted way, this kind of judgements but afterwards he can’t integrate them in his code of conduct.
Drahovzalová, Dominika. "Vliv rasistických postojů na moralní usuzování." Master's thesis, 2017. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-354543.
Повний текст джерелаGiersberg, Lynn. "Intergroup implications of moral divides over arranged marriages in Germany." Master's thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10071/20727.
Повний текст джерелаDevido à migração, dois sistemas matrimoniais vêm a coexistir na Alemanha: casamentos por amor e casamentos arranjados, sendo esto último desencadeado um debate intenso na sociedade alemã. Este estudo investigou os fundamentos morais das atitudes negativas em relação aos grupos que se envolvem em casamentos arranjados entre cidadãos adultos alemães (N =327). Com a base na Teoria das Fundações Morais, os fundamentos morais individualizados e libertária foram hipoteticamente para prever as atitudes negativas em relação aos casamentos arranjados, sendo as atitudes em relação aos casamentos arranjas a mediadora desta relação. A partir daí, são introduzidas competências interculturais como moderadores, que amortecem a relação entre convicções morais e as atitudes negativas em relação aos casamentos arranjados. Inesperadamente, os resultados mostraram que os fundamentos morais individualizados e libertários têm atitudes mais positivas em relação aos grupos que se envolvem em casamentos arranjados (i.e., menor distância social e desumanização). Em contraste, a fundação vinculativa prevê um maior distanciamento social, e desumanização dos grupos que se empenham em casamentos arranjados. O papel do mediador em relação às atitudes da prática não foi apoiado. As competências interculturais não foram moderadoras significativos. Os resultados e as suas implicações são discutíveis.
SPIŠÁKOVÁ, Mária. "ETICKÁ VÝCHOVA A JEJÍ VÝCHODISKA VE SROVNÁNÍ S PRAXÍ ETICKÉ VÝCHOVY V SLOVENSKÉ A ČESKÉ REPUBLICE." Master's thesis, 2015. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-200490.
Повний текст джерела