Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Lex posterior derogat priori"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Lex posterior derogat priori".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Lex posterior derogat priori":
1
Rian Rahadian. "KETERKAITAN PASAL RUKUHPIDANA DENGAN CYBER LAW, SEBAGAI PELAKSANA ASAS LEX POSTERIOR DEROGAT LEGI PRIORI." BUANA ILMU 7, no. 1 (December 1, 2022): 283–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.36805/bi.v7i1.5155.
Анотація:
Asas lex posteriori derogat legi priori dengan pengertian bahwa undang-undang baru itu merubah atau meniadakan undang-undang lama yang mengatur materi yang sama. mengatur masalah yang sama dalam hierarki yang sama. Sebagai pembaruan KUHP yang lama, RUU KUHP, akan mulai berlaku setelah tahun terhitung sejak tanggal diundangkan, berdasarkan Pasal 624 KUHP. RUU KUHP ada terkaitan dengan cyber law, sebab Banyak mengatur Aktivitas Kejahatan Cyber, atau Cybercrime.
Kata Kunci: Asas Lex posterior derogat legi priori, Merubah, meniadakan, Pasal 624 KUHPidana, Kejahatan Cyber.
The principle of lex posteriori derogat legi priori means that the new law changes or abolishes the old law which regulates the same matter. organize the same problem in the same hierarchy. As a renewal of the old Criminal Code, the RUU KUHP will come into force after the year from the date of promulgation, based on Article 624 of the Criminal Code. The Criminal Code Bill is related to cyber law, because it regulates a lot of Cybercrime Activities, or Cybercrime.
Keywords: The principle of Lex posterior derogat legi priori, Amend, abolish, Article 624 of the Criminal Code, Cyber Crime.
2
Halpérin, Jean-Louis. "Lex posterior derogat priori, lex specialis derogat generali Jalons pour une histoire des conflits de normes centrée sur ces deux solutions concurrentes." TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR RECHTSGESCHIEDENIS 80, no. 3-4 (2012): 353–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718190-000a1212.
Анотація:
Lex posterior derogat priori, lex specialis derogat generali, Guidelines for a history of conflicting norms with a focus on these two competing solutions. – The two Latin maxims, Lex posterior derogat priori and Lex specialis derogat generali, sometimes presented as evidentially logical, have a complex history and a delicate relationship (whereas the latter can contradict the former). They take their origins in the Digest, but in rather paradoxical forms: Lex posterior is coming from a text written in Greek by Modestinus, lex generalis is induced from a general regula exposed by Papinianus. How have these two ways of resolving the problem of conflicting norms emerged in Roman law? How have they been quoted and explained in canon and in civil law during the Middle Ages? How have they been used by sovereigns and in which scope do they serve the foundations of modern States? This paper tries to answer these questions by analyzing texts where the two maxims are mentioned and proposes to treat this subject as a significant chapter of the history of the sources of law.
3
Dita Helena, Ida Ayu Putri, and I. Gusti Ayu Putri Putri Kartika. "CURATOR'S LEGAL EFFORTS AGAINST BANKRUPTCY ESTATE (BOEDEL) ASSETS SEIZED IN CRIMINAL CONFISCATION OF CORRUPTION CASES." POLICY LAW NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) 3, no. 2 (March 7, 2024): 228–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i2.1096.
Анотація:
This paper aims to analyze the legal aspects of the general seizure and criminal seizure in Indonesian positive law, as well as to understand the legal efforts of the curator towards the assets of bankrupt estates placed under criminal seizure for corruption and economic crimes. The method used in writing this article is the normative legal research method, which starts from the normative problem of conflict of norms, and the results of this journal article are to determine the position of general seizure and criminal seizure based on the principle of legal preference, namely the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori, lex posterior derogate legi priori, and lex specialis derogate legi generalis, and the legal efforts that can be taken by the curator when the assets of bankrupt estates are placed under criminal seizure is by filing an objection to the Corruption Court and by filing a pretrial against the seizure actions carried out by the corruption investigators. The legal status of general attachment and criminal attachment can be determined by the principles of legal preference, including lex superior derogat legi inferiori, lex posterior derogate legi priori, and lex specialis derogate legi generalis. In most cases, general attachment takes priority over criminal attachment, except in cases of corruption (tipikor). In such cases, neither general nor criminal attachment can take precedence over the other. If criminal attachment is imposed on a bankrupt estate, the Curator can file an objection with the Corruption Court within two months of the court decision.
4
Ghambaryan, Artur S. "THE CONFLICT RULE “LEX POSTERIOR” IN ARMENIAN LAW." RUDN Journal of Law 24, no. 4 (December 15, 2020): 1224–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2020-24-4-1224-1239.
Анотація:
The rule Lex posterior derogat legi priori (the later law cancels the earlier one) has a universal doctrinal meaning. The preservation of this principle over the centuries shows its importance and axiomatic character. However, the situation in the Armenian practice is different. This article discusses the legality of the conflict of laws rule of the RA Law On Normative Legal Acts, according to which, in the event of a conflict between the earlier and later laws in force, the earlier law applies. The author investigates the conflict rule Les posterior from comparative-legal and historical points of view, and concludes that the regulation provided by the RA Law On Normative Legal Acts contradicts the laws of dialectics, and axiomatic truths, reflected in Roman law, thus, it is essential to revise it. The philosophical basis of the new law abolishes the old rule is the law of the dialectics denial of the denial, which gives high authority and value to the Lex posterior rule. The rule Lex posterior is the means of ensuring the Constitutional freedom of generations. Freedom of generation implies that the new generation is free from the rules established by previous generations and is free to change them. In addition, a law written later must prevail over earlier laws, based on the principle of democracy by the people. Before Lex posterior derogat legi priori law is fixed in practice, in case of conflict between the old and the new norms that have equal legal force, the highest Courts of the Republic of Armenia should give preference to the legal norm that came into force later.
5
Poljić, Adis. "Kontradiktornost pravila parničnog postupka za dosuđivanje troškova u slučaju djelomičnog povlačenja tužbe." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 42, no. 1 (2021): 227–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.42.1.12.
Анотація:
Predmet je rada kontradiktornost pravila parničnog postupka za dosuđivanje troškova u slučaju djelomičnoga povlačenja tužbe. Do utvrđivanja kontradiktornosti dolazi se analizom pravila za odlučivanje o troškovima parničnog postupka u slučaju djelomičnog povlačenja tužbe i pravila za dosuđivanje troškova u slučaju djelomičnog uspjeha u parnici. Na hipotetičko postavljenom primjeru ukazuje se na razlike do koji se dolazi primjenom tih pravila. Na temelju pravila za tumačenje prava lex specialis derogat legi generali i lex posterior derogat legi priori, dolazi se do zaključka da kod djelomičnog povlačenja tužbe treba primijeniti pravila za dosuđivanje troškova parničnog postupka u slučaju djelomičnog uspjeha.
6
Poljić, Adis. "Kontradiktornost pravila parničnog postupka za dosuđivanje troškova u slučaju djelomičnog povlačenja tužbe." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 42, no. 1 (2021): 227–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.42.1.12.
Анотація:
Predmet je rada kontradiktornost pravila parničnog postupka za dosuđivanje troškova u slučaju djelomičnoga povlačenja tužbe. Do utvrđivanja kontradiktornosti dolazi se analizom pravila za odlučivanje o troškovima parničnog postupka u slučaju djelomičnog povlačenja tužbe i pravila za dosuđivanje troškova u slučaju djelomičnog uspjeha u parnici. Na hipotetičko postavljenom primjeru ukazuje se na razlike do koji se dolazi primjenom tih pravila. Na temelju pravila za tumačenje prava lex specialis derogat legi generali i lex posterior derogat legi priori, dolazi se do zaključka da kod djelomičnog povlačenja tužbe treba primijeniti pravila za dosuđivanje troškova parničnog postupka u slučaju djelomičnog uspjeha.
7
Saputra, Fauzan. "IMPLEMENTASI QANUN ACEH NO. 10 TAHUN 2004 DALAM PELAKSANAAN FUNGSI PERBANKAN DI ACEH." Jurnal Dialektika Hukum 3, no. 1 (June 1, 2021): 70–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.36859/jdh.v3i1.530.
Анотація:
Penulisan ini dilatar bekalangi terkait implementasi pembiayaan kredit yang dilakukan oleh perbankan di Aceh. Bank merupakan badan usaha yang memiliki peranan penting dalam perekonomian di Indonesia. Keberadaan Bank telah mendukung upaya pertumbuhan ekonomi suatu negara. Fungsi bank menjadi intermediasi bagi masyarakat yang kelebihan dana kepada masyarakat dan kekurangan dana. Dalam rangka melakukan pemberdayaan ekonomi masyarakat, bank memberikan kredit kepada masyarakat ekonomi menengah untuk melakukan Usaha Kecil Masyarakat (UKM). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimana Implementasi Qanun Aceh Nomor 10 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemberdayaan Sentra Usaha kecil. Hasil penelitian terdapat bahwa qanun Aceh tetap dijalankan oleh Bank walaupun sebenarnya aturan hukumnya tidak memiliki kekuatan hukum bertentangan asas Lex posterior derogat legi priori dan asas Lex superior derogat legi inferior.
8
Aziz, Muhammad, Ahmad Rofiq, and Abdul Ghofur. "Regulasi Penyelenggaraan Jaminan Produk Halal di Indonesia Perspektif Statute Approach." ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 14, no. 1 (September 1, 2019): 151–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2019.14.1.150-170.
Анотація:
his research is focused on the regulation of implementing guarantee for halal products in Indonesia and crucial issues related to them. This research is normative juridical research using a statute approach. The conclusions of this study include; first, there are several crucial issues and topics relating to the implementation of guarantee of halal products in Indonesia, namely halal certification, mandatory and voluntary in halal certification, criminal provisions, and halal product guarantee management institutions. Second, the regulation of halal product guarantees when viewed from the Statute Approach can be analyzed using three legal principles: (1) lex superior derogat legi inferiori concludes that all rules for guaranteeing lower halal products are replaced by the higher ones; (2) lex specialis derogat legi generali confirms that the JPH Law is a specific regulation that regulates the guarantee of halal products; and (3) lex posterior derogat legi priori requires that the rules for guaranteeing halal products as contained in the JPH Law replace the guarantee rules for halal products that existed in the previous period.
9
Anatasia, Defanny Fitri. "MENTERI KESEHATAN SEBAGAI LEADING SECTOR DALAM PENANGANAN WABAH COVID-19 DITINJAU DARI TEORI KEWENANGAN." Gloria Justitia 1, no. 1 (January 7, 2022): 28–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.25170/gloriajustitia.v1i1.3028.
Анотація:
Based on the Government Regulation of the of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020, Large-Scale Social Restrictions (PSBB). The Ministry of Health is authorized to make technical regulations. Minister of Health made Minister of Health Regulation Number 9 of 2020, PSBB. Seems like the synergy between the Ministries hasn’t been implemented properly, ex. the Ministry of Law and Human Rights published Regulation of The Ministry of Law and Human Rights Number 10 of 2020 and The Ministry of Transportation with their Regulation Minister of Transportation Number 18 of 2020 changed to Regulation of Minister of Transportation 41 of 2020. The regulations contradict with the Minister of Health a quo regulation. Which regulation should be used? Who’s responsible for it? It’s necessary to review synchronization between Ministry regulations.
This research used Normative Juridical, Literature Study, Interview, and Analysis Method.
A brief conclusion if there’s a lawsuit against the a quo regulation then the responsibility lies with the Ministry of Health. Disharmonization between ministerial regulations can be resolved by Judicial Review, Mediation by the Ministry of Law and Human Rights, and applying the principles of Lex Superior Derogat Legi Inferiori, Lex Specialis Derogat Legi Generalis, and Lex Posterior Derogat Legi Priori Principles.
10
W, Jaka Kusnanto, Dafianto Arief, Effri Susanto, Charles Siagian, Retno Ambarsari, and Elviera Melany. "KEWENANGAN PRESIDEN DALAM KONSIL KEDOKTERAN INDONESIA (ANALISA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO.128/PK/TUN/2022)." Jurnal Darma Agung 31, no. 1 (April 30, 2023): 1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/ojsuda.v31i1.3058.
Анотація:
The President's duties and authority must be based on Basic and recognized law, Otherwise, it’s illegitimate. The Indonesian Medical Council is an autonomous, independent, nonstructural, aimed at protecting the community and improving the quality of health services. Supreme Court Decision No.128 PK/TUN/2022, void Presidential Decree No.55/M/Year2022, requires the President to revoke and issue new decision. Problem formulated: President authorities in the Indonesian Medical Council and existing regulations, with normative legal study methods. Principle hierarchy of Indonesia Legislations are Lex superiori derogat legi inferiori, Lex specialis derogat legi generali, Lex posteriori derogat legi priori, Regulations abolished with equal or higher. Appointment the Medical Council 2020-2025, material review Article 1 Permenkes No.81/2019 Amendments No.496/MENKES/PER/V/2008 “Procedures Proposing Candidates for Members The Indonesian Medical Council” contradicted Law No.29/2004 “Medical Practice”, so that Presidential Decree No.55/2020 was repealed.
Дисертації з теми "Lex posterior derogat priori":
1
Vasalou, Evangelia. "Les conflits d’obligations internationales devant la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Université Paris-Panthéon-Assas, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024ASSA0005.
Анотація:
Ayant comme axe principal la jurisprudence de la Cour EDH, la présente thèse est centrée sur les conflits entre la CEDH et les autres obligations internationales incombant aux États parties. L’approche de la Cour EDH témoigne de la nécessité de cohérence en droit et de l’harmonisation des conflits d’obligations. Visant à harmoniser les éventuelles contrariétés la Cour de Strasbourg ne s’est pas interrogée sur les causes de ces conflits. L’objet de cette thèse consiste ainsi à rechercher s’il y a des règles juridiques aptes à aménager les conflictualités en amont en générant pour les États l’obligation d’élaborer des normes créant des obligations concordantes. En outre, l’étude se fixe pour objectif de systématiser les cas des conflits entre la CEDH et les autres obligations internationales dans les affaires portées devant la Cour EDH, afin de mettre en relief les conditions d’émergence de ces conflits et de s’interroger sur les moyens de leur gestion. Une grande partie de la réflexion va au-delà de la critique de l’efficacité des moyens d’harmonisation employés par la jurisprudence strasbourgeoise pour proposer des solutions permettant d’éviter les conflits. L’analyse de l’applicabilité des moyens de résolution des conflits s’inscrit dans le cadre de la gestion des conflits dans lesquels sont impliquées les obligations issues de la CEDH. Dans ce contexte, la thèse met l’accent sur les moyens de résolution des conflits qui pourraient être appliqués dans le futur, dans l’hypothèse où la Cour EDH reconnaitrait explicitement une situation de conflit entre la CEDH et une autre obligation internationaleThis thesis explores the question of conflicts between the ECHR and other international obligations for State parties by focusing on the case law of the ECtHR. The ECtHR's approach reflects the need for consistency in law and harmonisation of conflicting obligations. Setting the objective of harmonising potential conflicts, the Court of Strasbourg did not raise the question about the causes of those conflicts. This thesis seeks to examine whether there are any legal rules that could prevent conflicts by obliging States to establish norms that createcompatible obligations. In addition, the study aims to systematise conflicts between the ECHR and other international obligations in cases which were lodged with the ECtHR, in order to highlight the conditions of emergence of these conflicts and to examine the means of their coordination. The overarching theme of the study goes beyond the criticism of the effectiveness of the means of harmonisation applied by the case-law of the Court of Strasbourg, proposing solutions for the avoidance of conflicts. The analysis of the applicability of the means of conflict resolution is part of the management of conflicts in which the obligations of the ECHRare involved. In this context, the thesis delves into the means of conflict resolution that could be applied in the future, should the ECtHR explicitly recognise a situation of conflict between the ECHR and another international obligation
Частини книг з теми "Lex posterior derogat priori":
1
Gołba, Filip, and Magdalena Latacz. "Lex posterior derogat legi priori." In Argumenty i rozumowania prawnicze w konstytucyjnym państwie prawa: Komentarz, 726–39. Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/9788381383370.49.
2
Gołba, Filip, and Magdalena Michalska. "Lex posterior generalis non derogat legi priori speciali." In Argumenty i rozumowania prawnicze w konstytucyjnym państwie prawa: Komentarz, 740–50. Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/9788381383370.50.