Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Labour surplus villages"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Labour surplus villages".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Labour surplus villages"
Singh Rajput, Arjun, Latika Sharma, P. S. Shekhawat, and Vikash Pawariya. "Estimation of seasonal surplus labour in agriculture in different agro-climatic regions of Rajasthan." Environment Conservation Journal 23, no. 1&2 (February 1, 2022): 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.36953/ecj.021873-2142.
Повний текст джерелаXolmuminov, Sh. "FUNDAMENTALS OF HR MARKETING RESEARCH OF THE RURAL LABOUR MARKET IN LABOUR-SURPLUS REGIONS." Journal of Science and Innovative Development 4, no. 3 (June 30, 2021): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.36522/2181-9637-2021-3-1.
Повний текст джерелаLopez-Alonso, Rocío Hiraldo. "Value is Still Labour: Exploitation and the Production of Environmental Rent and Commodities for Nature Tourists in Rural Senegal." Human Geography 10, no. 2 (July 2017): 54–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/194277861701000204.
Повний текст джерелаSINGH, K. M., R. K. P. SINGH, ANJANI KUMAR, ABHAY KUMAR, M. S. MEENA, and V. P. CHAHAL. "Implications of labour migration for rice production and household economy: Evidences from eastern India." Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85, no. 6 (June 5, 2015): 768–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijas.v85i6.49191.
Повний текст джерелаDipankar De. "Surplus Crop Residues for Energy Generation in Selected Districts of Madhya Pradesh - An Assessment." Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India) 45, no. 4 (December 31, 2008): 50–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.52151/jae2008454.1351.
Повний текст джерелаSHUKLA, ADITYA, and Ramchandra Ramchandra. "A Study on Economics of Marketing and Production of Aonla in District Pratapgarh (U.P.)." International Journal of Advances in Agricultural Science and Technology 8, no. 9 (September 30, 2021): 142–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.47856/ijaast.2021.v08i9.016.
Повний текст джерелаSelden, Mark. "Jack Gray, Mao Zedong and the Political Economy of Chinese Development." China Quarterly 187 (September 2006): 680–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0305741006000300.
Повний текст джерелаYi, Pan, Li Xin, and Sheng Yu Guo. "Thinking of Village Construction in Central Region under the Context of Labor Migration." Applied Mechanics and Materials 507 (January 2014): 666–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.507.666.
Повний текст джерелаYang, Yang, Hua Li, Zhen Liu, Long Cheng, Assem Abu Hatab, and Jing Lan. "Effect of Forestland Property Rights and Village Off-Farm Environment on Off-Farm Employment in Southern China." Sustainability 12, no. 7 (March 25, 2020): 2605. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072605.
Повний текст джерелаYdyrys, S. S., R. K. Niyazbekova, and S. A. Ilasheva. "State regulation of labor market in labor-surplus rural regions of Kazakhstan." Problems of AgriMarket, no. 4 (December 15, 2022): 179–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.46666/2022-4.2708-9991.19.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Labour surplus villages"
Datta, Pradip Kumar. "Mobilising the basic resources in a set of labour surplus villages." Thesis, University of North Bengal, 1996. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/214.
Повний текст джерелаКниги з теми "Labour surplus villages"
Toulmin, Camilla. Cattle, Women, and Wells. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198853046.001.0001.
Повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Labour surplus villages"
Edwards, Jeanette. "In-Migration and Out-Migration." In Born and Bred, 76–104. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198233947.003.0004.
Повний текст джерелаBrødsgaard, Kjeld Erik, and Kamal Sheel. "Informalization and Growth: the Political Economy of Local Enterprises." In State Capacity in East Asia, 203–35. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198297635.003.0010.
Повний текст джерелаLander, Brian. "The Nature of Political Power." In The King's Harvest, 14–31. Yale University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/yale/9780300255089.003.0002.
Повний текст джерелаPallot, Judith, and Tat'yana Nefedova. "Household Food Production—What Next?" In Russia's Unknown Agriculture. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199227419.003.0015.
Повний текст джерела"subsistence production (where in the colonial period mainly extra-economic factors such as forced cultivation or forced labour caused the integration of the peasantry in the market exchange). Socialist development was there-fore strongly identified with modernising through the rapid expansion of the state sector, that is, nationalisation and mechanisation on an ever-increasing scale. The peasantry would be gradually absorbed within this expanding sector, and hence, at first, the role of the peasantry was seen as essentially passive with its transformation mainly centring on social aspects. As such, the policy of communal villages became virtually a habitational concept (and was in actual fact the responsibility of the national directorate of housing): a question of social infrastructures (water supplies, schools, etc.) within a concept of communal life without concerning production and its transformation. This view conflicted heavily with the objective conditions in the rural areas characterised by a deep involvement of the peasantry in market relationships and their dependence on it either as suppliers of labour power or as cash crop producers. This contradiction became more obvious, when the balance of payments became a real constraint (in 1979) and, hence, the question of financing accumulation cropped up more strongly in practice. The peasantry as suppliers of cash crops, of food and of labour power to the state sectors occupied a crucial position in production and accumulation. However, the crucial question then becomes whether the peasantry only performs the role of supplying part of the accumulation fund or whether the peasantry itself is part and parcel of the process of transformation and hence that accumulation embraces as an integral part the transformation of peasant agriculture into more socialised forms of production. In other words, it poses the question whether the strategy is based on a primitive socialist accumulation on the basis of the peasantry (transferring the agrarian surplus to the develop-ment of the state sector), or whether accumulation includes the transformation of peasant agriculture. Clearly, the way this question is posed in practice will influence heavily the nature of the organisation of the exchange between the state sector and the peasantry. The proposition that the state sector can develop under its own steam (with or without the aid of external borrowing) cannot bypass this crucial question since, on the one hand, a considerable part of foreign exchange earnings and of the food supply to the towns depended on peasant production and, on the other, the very conditions of productivity and profitability in the agrarian state sector depended heavily on the organic link that existed.between labour supply and family agriculture. The monetary disequilibrium originating from the state sector has a severe impact on the organisation of the exchange between the state sector and the peasantry. First, the imbalance between the demand for and the supply of consumer commodities affected rural areas differently from urban areas. The reason was that in urban areas the rationing system guaranteed to each family a minimum quantity of basic consumer necessities at official prices. In the rural areas the principal form of rationing remained the queue! Hence, forced savings were distributed differently over urban and rural areas. Furthermore, the concentration of resources on the state sector also implied that the peasants'." In The Agrarian Question in Socialist Transitions, 205. Routledge, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203043493-29.
Повний текст джерела