Готові списки джерел за темами / Kuhn / Статті в журналах
Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Kuhn.

Статті в журналах з теми "Kuhn"

Автор: Grafiati
Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021
Оновлено: 30 липня 2024

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Kuhn".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Székely, László. "A kopernikuszi elmélet recepciója a német protestáns egyetemeken és a tudományos paradigma kuhni fogalmának korlátjai." Per Aspera ad Astra 9, no. 2 (March 30, 2023): 9–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.15170/paaa.2022.09.02.01.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thomas Kuhn tudományfilozófiájának recepciójával a tudományokról való magyar gondolkodás fölzárkózhatott a nemzetközi tendenciákhoz. Ugyanakkor Kuhn elméletének egy speciális, leegyszerűsített és kritikátlan megközelítése vált meghatározóvá, mely figyelmen kívül hagyva Kuhn későbbi korrekciós szándékát, az eredeti, 1962-es könyv koncepciójához ragaszkodott. Az ennek nyomán teret nyerő, sokszor radikális relativizmusba hajló tudományfölfogás nem csupán leegyszerűsítő, ideologikus képet nyújt a tudományokról, hanem egyúttal a tudományos paradigma eredeti kuhni elméletének néhány mozzanatához (így az összemérhetetlenséghez, a kölcsönös megértés nyelvi-fogalmi okok miatti hiányához, és a paradigmaváltás holista szemléletéhez) dogmatikusan ragaszkodva, blokkolja a tudománytörténet sokszínűségének föltárását, elvárva, hogy a tudománytörténeti események minden esetben szigorúan e fölfogásának és fogalmaknak megfelelően kerüljenek értelmezésre. E fölfogást bírálva előbb röviden vázoljuk a tudományos paradigma kuhni fogalmát, majd a kopernikuszi elmélet németországi recepciójával foglalkozó kutatások eredményeit fölhasználva bemutatjuk a ptolemaioszi és a kopernikuszi elmélet kuhni összevetésének tarthatatlanságát. Ennek során egyrészt jelezzük, hogy nem csupán a Kuhnra hivatkozó, de az általa elutasított radikális tudományfilozófiai relativizmus, hanem az eredeti kuhni paradigmaelmélet is alkalmatlan a Kopernikusz-recepció értelmezésére. Másrészt amellett érvelünk, hogy a tudományos paradigma kuhni fogalmának a diszciplináris mátrix eszméjét is fölhasználó, revidiált-strukturált, nem holista változata megfelelő teoretikus eszközt kínál a kopernikuszi recepció első, protestáns fázisának tárgyalására.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Tuboly, Adam Tamas. "Kuhn, Kuhn, Kuhn: New Wine into Old Bottles?" Journal for General Philosophy of Science 48, no. 4 (February 6, 2017): 601–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10838-016-9359-3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Gyimesi, Zoltán. "Thomas S. Kuhn gondolatainak szerepe a földrajztudomány történetének kontextualista elbeszélésében." Tér és Társadalom 25, no. 1 (March 1, 2011): 81–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.17649/tet.25.1.1774.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
A tudományos tudás filozófiai és történeti vonatkozásai elengedhetetlenek a nemzetközi társadalom-földrajzi szakirodalomban érvényesülő, episztemológiailag különböző irányzatok pluralizmusának érdemi megértéséhez. Ezeknek az irányzatoknak a világos és megfelelő közvetítése nélkül a feltehetően posztszocialista állapotban lévő hazai társadalomföldrajzban uralkodó filozófiai identitásválság csak fokozódhat. Thomas S. Kuhn és a társadalomföldrajz találkozása jó esettanulmányt képez a tudománytörténet-írás kontextualista megközelítéseinek bemutatásához. Kuhn gondolatait a tudományos diskurzusok vitáiban folyamatosan kontextusán kívül értelmezték újra, és az aktuális tudományos érdekeknek megfelelően mozgósították fogalmait. A „kvantitatív forradalom” olyan pozitivista narratívát konstruált, amely Kuhn „tudományos forradalmának” kifejezésére és a paradigmák progresszív sorára leegyszerűsített „kuhni modellre” támaszkodott, mindez pedig a múlt újraírását szolgálta a jelen álláspontok érdekében. Később, a „forradalom” kritikai újraértelmezése során a „modell” tudománytörténeti alkalmasságát alapvetően elvetették, annak ellenére, hogy Kuhn több gondolata eredetileg anti-pozitivista és erősen kritikus volt. Ugyanakkor éppen a kritikai átértékelések közepette jelentek meg az első kontextualista gondolatok, melyek nagyon hasonlítottak Kuhn eredeti elképzeléseire az analógiák heurisztikus jelentőségéről, a szemléletek inkommenzurabilitásáról, a pedagógia és a képzés szerepéről a tudósközösségben, de leginkább a prezentista történetírás éles kritizálásáról. A tanulmány célja, hogy bemutassa Kuhn szövegbeli, szemléleti és történelmi kontextusát az angolszász és a magyar interpretációk kritikai elemzésével, hogy ismertesse a kontextualista és szociológiai megközelítéseket a magyar földrajzosok számára a történeti elbeszélés szempontjából.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

MAUDLIN, Tim. "Kuhn édenté." Revue Philosophique de Louvain 94, no. 3 (August 1, 1996): 428–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/rpl.94.3.541797.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Solé, Carlota. "Thomas Kuhn." Papers. Revista de Sociologia 51 (January 1, 1997): 289. http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers.1871.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Daly, Christopher. "Thomas Kuhn." International Philosophical Quarterly 44, no. 2 (2004): 268–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ipq200444212.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Read, Rupert. "Thomas Kuhn." International Studies in Philosophy 35, no. 4 (2003): 162–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/intstudphil200335429.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Pajares, Frank. "Thomas Kuhn." Philosophers' Magazine, no. 2 (1998): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/tpm1998275.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Wheatley, G. A. "Heinrich Kuhn." Physics World 8, no. 1 (January 1995): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2058-7058/8/1/18.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Munz, Peter. "Kuhn traduced." Social Epistemology 17, no. 2-3 (January 2003): 247–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269172032000144243.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
11

Kuukkanen, Jouni‐Matti. "Rereading Kuhn." International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23, no. 2 (July 2009): 217–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698590903007204.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
12

SWEENEY, B. "Franz Kuhn." Anaesthesia 40, no. 10 (October 1985): 1000–1005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10556.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
13

Hattiangadi, Jagdish. "Kuhn debunked." Social Epistemology 17, no. 2-3 (January 2003): 175–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10269172032000144135.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
14

French, Steven. "Beyond Kuhn." Metascience 16, no. 3 (September 19, 2007): 503–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11016-007-9140-7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
15

De Oliveira, Valeriano A., and Marko A. Rojas-Medar. "Continuous-Time Multiobjective Optimization Problems via Invexity." Abstract and Applied Analysis 2007 (2007): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2007/61296.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
We introduce some concepts of generalized invexity for the continuous-time multiobjective programming problems, namely, the concepts of Karush-Kuhn-Tucker invexity and Karush-Kuhn-Tucker pseudoinvexity. Using the concept of Karush-Kuhn-Tucker invexity, we study the relationship of the multiobjective problems with some related scalar problems. Further, we show that Karush-Kuhn-Tucker pseudoinvexity is a necessary and suffcient condition for a vector Karush-Kuhn-Tucker solution to be a weakly efficient solution.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
16

Chandran, Aswin, Prem Sagar, Ashu Seith Bhalla, and Rajeev Kumar. "Mounier-Kuhn syndrome." BMJ Case Reports 14, no. 1 (January 2021): e239876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2020-239876.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
17

Schiettecatte, E., E. Van Hedent, R. Van Herreweghe, and K. Verstraete. "Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome." Journal of the Belgian Society of Radiology 98, no. 3 (June 1, 2015): 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbr-btr.803.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
18

Freitas, Renan Springer de. "Des-naturalizando Kuhn." Estudos Avançados 12, no. 33 (August 1998): 185–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-40141998000200014.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
19

Moleski, Martin X. "Polanyi vs. Kuhn." Tradition and Discovery: The Polanyi Society Periodical 33, no. 2 (2006): 8–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/traddisc2006/200733219.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
20

Feldbacher, Christian J., and Stefan H. Gugerell. "Rezension: Thomas Kuhn." KRITERION – Journal of Philosophy 1, no. 23 (January 1, 2010): 91–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/krt-2010-012307.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
21

Pertierra, Iñaki Xavier Larrauri. "Kuhn the Contextualist?" Aristos: A biannual journal featuring excellent student works 5, no. 1 (June 2020): 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.32613/aristos/2020.5.1.4.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
According to Kuhn’s account of the nature of scientific paradigms, how one experiences the world varies drastically from one context to another depending on the accepted paradigm of the context in question. In other words, one’s pre-existing conceptual structure concerning the world not only acts as an epistemological framework for its possible understanding, but also fundamentally affects the phenomenological observations of the world as something; this latter function of the conceptual structure motivates the view that mature scientific paradigms/theories and the data of scientific observation/experimentation are essentially two sides of the same coin. What is interesting, then, is that even between different historical eras that generally regarded the world in clearly incompatible ways, albeit still informed by paradigms, Kuhn still attributes scientific knowledge to each. To make sense of this, the explanatory resources of epistemological contextualism are used to specify potentially one way in which epistemic standards for knowledge must change between different historical eras for one to justifiably claim scientific knowledge within these different contexts. As we shall see, the argument for Kuhn’s account of paradigm being contextualist in character is apparently best made through the notion of doubt-driven context-shifts as actualising change in the form of P between different contexts in which “S knows that P” is asserted. As such, this paper first explores Kuhn’s account of scientific knowledge and paradigms before considering how the account can be considered contextualist in nature. Moreover, other context-concerned systems, such as Traditional, and Subject-Sensitive Invariantism, are briefly investigated to substantiate claims of what cannot be accurately ascribed to Kuhn’s epistemology.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
22

Jarvie, Ian. "Fuller on Kuhn." Social Epistemology 17, no. 2-3 (January 2003): 187–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269172032000144153.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
23

Jensen, Hans Siggaard. "Crisis, Kuhn, Fuller." Social Epistemology 17, no. 2-3 (January 2003): 197–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269172032000144162.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
24

Margolis, Howard. "Being therewithThomas Kuhn." Social Epistemology 17, no. 2-3 (January 2003): 221–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269172032000144207.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
25

Torretti, Roberto. "Fuller on Kuhn." Social Epistemology 17, no. 2-3 (January 2003): 301–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0269172032000144342.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
26

Pesut, Dragica, Ruza Stevic, Jelica Milosavljevic, Spasoje Popevic, and Tijana Cvok. "Mounier-Kuhn syndrome." Vojnosanitetski pregled 68, no. 12 (2011): 1068–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/vsp1112068p.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Background. Mounier-Kuhn syndrome or tracheobronchomegaly is a rare disorder characterized by marked dilatation of the trachea and main bronchi, bronchiectasis, and recurrent respiratory tract infections. Its clinical presentation may vary and mimick a variety of disorders. Case report. A 43-year-old female patient, non smoker, complained of intermittent mild dyspnea. Lung function tests and cardiologic findings were within normal limits. The diagnosis was established by computed tomography, which was undertaken due to recurrent lower respiratory tract infections suggestive of bronchiectasis. The transversal tracheal diameter was 2.8 cm that was the criteria for making the diagnosis. In this sporadic case, no association with other disease or condition known to cause secondary tracheobronchomegaly was established. Conclusion. Although rare in clinical practice, Mounier-Kuhn syndrome is an important differential diagnosis in cardio-pulmonary medicine due to a variety of its clinical manifestations. Nowadays, it is easy to diagnose it owing to advanced imaging techniques.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
27

Goldstein, Lawrence S., James J. Walsh, and Atul C. Mehta. "Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome." Journal of Bronchology 4, no. 2 (April 1997): 148–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00128594-199704000-00013.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
28

Collins, Harry. "Comment on Kuhn." Social Studies of Science 42, no. 3 (April 3, 2012): 420–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306312712436571.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
29

Simon, Marioara, Petrut Vremaroiu, and Fabian Andrei. "Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome." Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology 21, no. 2 (April 2014): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/lbr.0000000000000068.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
30

Ozkaya, Sevket, Unal Sahin, Aziz Gumus, Asiye Yavuz, and Songul Ozyurt. "Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome." Journal of Bronchology & Interventional Pulmonology 17, no. 4 (October 2010): 362–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/lbr.0b013e3181f43172.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
31

Anoop, T. M., Sreejith G. Nair, and Geetha Narayanan. "Mounier–Kuhn syndrome." Acta Otorrinolaringologica (English Edition) 64, no. 5 (September 2013): 383–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otoeng.2013.10.001.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
32

Bird, Alexander. "V-Naturalizing Kuhn." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 105, no. 1 (September 2004): 99–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9264.2004.00166.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
33

FRIEDMAN, MICHAEL. "KUHN AND PHILOSOPHY." Modern Intellectual History 9, no. 1 (March 13, 2012): 77–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244311000485.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Initially trained as a physicist, Kuhn became a leading and extraordinarily influential figure in the history of science. He saw his work in the history of science as contributing to a novel philosophical conception of the nature of science. At the outset of Structure, for example, Kuhn announces his intention to replace the “development-by-accumulation” model he associates with the philosophical tradition before him—including, in particular, what he calls “early logical positivism”—with a new model of radical conceptual discontinuity or incommensurability. Structure was written during Kuhn's tenure teaching philosophy and history of science at Berkeley, and, shortly after its publication, he took up a new post as professor of philosophy and history of science at Princeton. From 1983 until his death in 1996 Kuhn was professor of philosophy at MIT, where he attempted further to articulate his conception of incommensurability, taking account of developments in linguistics and philosophy of language.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
34

Rouse, Joseph. "Recovering Thomas Kuhn." Topoi 32, no. 1 (October 30, 2012): 59–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-012-9143-x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
35

Aguiar, Filipa, Cecília Pacheco, and Pedro Silveira. "Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome." Archivos de Bronconeumología (English Edition) 55, no. 12 (December 2019): 650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arbr.2019.01.026.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
36

Aguiar, Filipa, Cecília Pacheco, and Pedro Silveira. "Mounier-Kuhn Syndrome." Archivos de Bronconeumología 55, no. 12 (December 2019): 650. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2019.01.004.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
37

Andresen, Jensine. "Crisis and Kuhn." Isis 90, S2 (January 1999): S43—S67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/384607.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
38

Bird, Alexander. "V *-NATURALIZING KUHN." Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) 105, no. 1 (June 2005): 99–117. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-7373.2004.00104.x.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
39

Buchwald, Jed Z. "Thomas S. Kuhn." Physics Today 49, no. 12 (December 1996): 74–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.881597.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
40

Simkins, Aron, Abhishek Maiti, Sujith V. Cherian, Daniel O. Trujillo, and Rosa M. Estrada-Y-Martin. "Mounier-Kuhn syndrome." Postgraduate Medical Journal 93, no. 1104 (June 8, 2017): 642. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-134958.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
41

Dmitriev, Igor S. "Copernicus Contra Kuhn." Epistemology & Philosophy of Science 59, no. 4 (2022): 126–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/eps202259462.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
T. Kuhn’s theory of scientific revolutions has repeatedly been the subject of criticism. It is important to note that Kuhn pays very limited attention to the phenomenon of the scientific revolution itself, comparing the revolution either with a religious conversion or with a gestalt switch. Such comparisons, however, are very superficial. This paper outlines a new understanding of the scientific revolution as a result of the resonance of the intellectual trends of the early modern period. It was the quasi-simultaneous action of various factors (from the great geographical discoveries to social cataclysms and the religious Reformation) that led to revolutionary changes in natural philosophy, which, in turn, gave rise (already in the XVIIIth century) to the actual scientific revolution. In addition, the article shows that the Copernican Revolution cannot be described within the model of scientific revolution developed by T. Kuhn. Ptolemy’s theory was mathematically constructed so that it could not make inaccurate predictions of planetary motion, because – as we are now clear – the function characterizing the trajectory of planetary motion was actually represented as a Fourier series. The Copernican revolution was not a Kuhn-type scientific revolution, nor was it caused by the empirical failures of Ptolemaic astronomy (i.e. the accumulation of anomalies turning into a crisis). Events unfolded according to a different scheme. Copernicus set out to carry out the principle of the uniform circular motion of the planets more consistently than had been done in Ptolemy’s theory, at the same time presenting to this theory those requirements of an aesthetic and methodological order, which the cognitively fragmented system of Ptolemy, for all its flexibility, could not satisfy and, by the conditions of its creation, could not satisfy. In addition, the article shows that Copernicus, in constructing his heliocentric theory, was essentially seeking answers to the challenges that Alberti’s artificial perspective and Nicholas of Cusa’s theological speculation posed to the visual experience in the sixteenth century.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
42

Andersen, Hanne. "Forholdet mellem videnskabshistorie og videnskabsfilosofi." Slagmark - Tidsskrift for idéhistorie, no. 28-29 (February 4, 2018): 71–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/sl.v0i28-29.103896.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Med denne sætning indledes Thomas S. Kuhns klassiker Videnskabens Revolu­tioner fra 1962, der mere end noget andet værk er kommet til at stå som indled­ningen til en historisk orienteret videnskabsteori. Kuhn gjorde sig her til tals­mand for, at historiske undersøgelser kunne have betydning for videnskabs­teorien - men vel at mærke historiske undersøgelser, der tilbød mere end blot at opremse kronologi og anekdoter.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
43

Fuller, Steve. "Permanent Revolution In Science: A Quantum Epistemology." Philosophy of the Social Sciences 51, no. 1 (June 4, 2020): 48–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0048393120910983.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
This article is the preface to the Russian translation of my Kuhn vs Popper. I use it as an opportunity to re-examine the difference between Kuhn and Popper on the nature of ‘revolutions’ in science. Kuhn is rightly seen as a ‘reluctant revolutionary’ and Popper a ‘permanent revolutionary’. In this respect, Kuhn sticks to the original medieval meaning of ‘revolution’ as restoration of a natural order, whereas Popper adopts the more modern meaning of ‘revolution’ that comes into fashion after the French Revolution, which suggests a radical renewal. A key to understanding this difference in revolutionary mentalities lies in Kuhn’s and Popper’s respective treatment of the ‘Gestalt switch’ phenomenon. Kuhn sees the ambiguous Gestalt figure from the standpoint of the subject, and Popper from that of the experimenter. Behind this difference lies alternative interpretations of the significance of quantum mechanics for scientific epistemology, a preoccupation that Kuhn and Popper shared with the original Gestalt psychologists and is beginning engage the interest of social scientists.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
44

Lukic, Nebojsa. "Kuhn’s philosophy of science of early and transitional period: Paradigms and incommensurability." Theoria, Beograd 61, no. 4 (2018): 69–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1804069l.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Even though Thomas Kuhn was a physicist by formal education, he is better known for his achievements in philosophy of science than in science itself. He was primarily concerned with history of science and subjects such as development of science, growth of scientific knowledge, changes in science and others. In that sense Kuhn was focused on giving the correct description of scientific reality in human history, that is, on giving the description of the most relevant elements of scientific research. Kuhn claims that scientists base their research on paradigms which are the key factor in scientific practice overall. All other concepts of Kuhn?s philosophy - such as, for instance, normal science, revolutionary science, incommensurability of paradigms - gain their meaning in relation to the concept of a paradigm. However, the concept of a paradigm in its original definition was very problematic, which, later on, led Kuhn to make its meaning more precise. Hence, the task of this paper is to illuminate the nature of that central concept i.e. to determine the essential features of a paradigm in relation to the rest of the conceptual network of Kuhn?s theory, and therefore its role in science and in that conceptual network. At the same time, the meaning of all those elements of Kuhnian science which are in direct relation to the paradigm will be illuminated. I will restrict my research on early and transitional period of Kuhn?s creatorship, and I base this distinction on Sankey?s analysis. The difference between these two periods is determined by Kuhn?s thinking about the formulation of the thesis of incommensurability of paradigms. Accordingly, it is necessary to deal with definition of incommensurability, its division to types and Kuhn?s view on implications of incommensurability for science and its progress.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
45

Anor, Kristianne C. "Science." Stance: an international undergraduate philosophy journal 5, no. 1 (September 12, 2012): 19–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.33043/s.5.1.19-30.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thomas Kuhn argues that scientific advancements sometimes involve paradigm shifts between incommunsurable theories, thoughts, and concepts. I argue that the phenomenon Kuhn is attempting to describe is better explained as akin to a greatest integer function of punctuated equilibrium. I conclude that Kuhn is mistaken in thinking that science is an actively vigorous, cumulative discipline.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
46

Oliveira, Bernardo Jefferson de, and Mauro Lúcio Leitão Condé. "THOMAS KUHN E A NOVA HISTORIOGRAFIA DA CIÊNCIA." Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte) 4, no. 2 (December 2002): 143–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172002040205.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Esse artigo procura mostrar a crítica de Thomas Kuhn a algumas concepções da historiografia da ciência contemporânea que radicalizaram muitas das posições formuladas inicialmente pelo próprio Kuhn. Pretende-se ainda mostrar que um reposicionamento de Kuhn, a partir de sua crítica a seus sucessores, o aproxima mais de suas influências iniciais, em especial, de Ludwig Wittgenstein e Ludwik Fleck.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
47

Dawson, Wayne, Kenji Yamamoto, Kentaro Shimizu, and Gota Kawai. "A new entropy model for RNA: part II. Persistence-related entropic contributions to RNA secondary structure free energy calculations." Journal of Nucleic Acids Investigation 4, no. 1 (March 15, 2013): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/jnai.2013.2651.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
In previous work, we have shown that the entropy of a folded RNA molecule can be divided into local and global contributions using the cross-linking entropy (CLE) model, where, in the case of RNA, the cross- links are the base-pair stacking interactions. The local contribution to the CLE is revealed in the Kuhn length (a measure of the stiffness of the RNA). The Kuhn length acts as a scaling parameter. When the size of the system is rescaled, the relationship between local and global free energy must be renormalized to reflect this rescaling. In this renormalization process, the Kuhn length increases, the local entropy also increases due to freezing out of the local conformational degrees of freedom. At the same time, as the number of degrees of freedom decrease, there is a significant reduction in the global entropy. Here we present a method, based on the concepts of renormalization theory, to quantitatively estimate the size of the contribution from the local entropy as a function of the Kuhn length. The local entropy correction is used to predict the current empirically derived constant in the Jacobson-Stockmayer equation. The variation in the Kuhn length is shown to be largely influenced by the length of the double-stranded RNA stems formed in the secondary structure of folded RNA. This result is used to test the resulting entropy under a variable Kuhn length in stem-loop structures. Comparisons between a variable Kuhn length and a static Kuhn length on a short stem-loop of RNA are also examined. The model is quite general and is also directly applicable to protein structure and folding problems.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
48

Sahbana, M. Dwi Rahman. "EPISTIMOLOGI PARADIGMA DAN REVOLUSI ILMU PENGETAHUAN THOMAS KUHN." Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 8, no. 1 (June 21, 2022): 31–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.20871/kpjipm.v8i1.188.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Thomas Kuhn dengan konsep revolusi ilmiahnya memiliki karakteristik pemikiran dan model filsafat baru dalam hal sejarah lahirnya ilmu pengetahuan dan filsafat sains serta peranan sejarah ilmu pengetahuan dalam mengkonstruksi ataupun merekonstruksi munculnya ilmu pengetahuan baru. Bagi Thomas Kuhn sejarah ilmu pengetahuan merupakan starting point dalam mengkaji permasalahan fundamental dalam epistemologi keilmuan karena sains pada dasarnya selalu ditandai dengan kuatnya paradigma serta revolusi ilmiah setelahnya. Fase inilah yang diistilahkan Thomas Kuhn sebagai fase sejarah lahirnya ilmu pengetahuan baru, dimulai dengan normal science, kemudian terjadi anomaly dan crisis, setelah itu barulah muncul revolusi ilmiah sebagai bentuk lahirnya ilmu pengetahuan baru. Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn tersebut dapat dikontekstualisasikan dengan pengembangan keilmuan Islam dengan tujuan membangun keterbukaan pemikiran keislaman terhadap anomali dan crisis serta munculnya revolusi dalam ilmu keislaman sehingga memotivasi munculnya paradigma baru di ranah keilmuan Islam. Berbagai pendekatan dalam studi Islam dapat digunakan seperti pendekatan normatif, historis, sosiologis, antropologis dan pendekatan lainnya dalam rangka membumikan Islam menjadi agama yang rahmatan lil alamin. Kata Kunci : Paradigma, Revolusi Ilmiah, Thomas Kuhn
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
49

Hernández, Geovanny, Franco Ruales, Leslie Vargas, and Fáiver Ramírez. "Síndrome de Mounier Kuhn." Acta Médica Colombiana 36, no. 1 (September 20, 2019): 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.36104/amc.2011.1519.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Paciente con un cuadro clínico crónico caracterizado por episodios intermitentes de tos y sibilancias interpretados previamente como crisis asmáticas, por hallazgos radiológicos se realiza diagnóstico de traqueobroncomegalia o síndrome de Mounier Kuhn. El síndrome de Mounier Kuhn es una malformación congénita rara del tracto respiratorio bajo, caracterizada por aumento del calibre de la tráquea y los bronquios principales debida a atrofia o ausencia de fibras elásticas del músculo liso del árbol bronquial, lo cual predispone a infecciones respiratorias a repetición debido a la inadecuada limpieza mucociliar, llevando a la aparición de bronquiectasias. Hay pocas descripciones de este síndrome a nivel mundial
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
50

Alcalá Campos, Raúl. "Kuhn y la racionalidad." Revista de filosofía DIÁNOIA 32, no. 32 (September 9, 1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iifs.18704913e.1986.32.713.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Також вас можуть зацікавити добірки на тему "Kuhn" для інших типів джерел:
Дисертації Книги
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії