Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Keynesian economics / Статті в журналах

Статті в журналах з теми "Keynesian economics"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Keynesian economics.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 4 червня 2021

Оновлено: 10 березня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Keynesian economics".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Guizzo, Danielle. "Why does the history of economic thought neglect Post-Keynesian economics?" Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 119–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.09.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Despite receiving increased interest after the global financial crisis of 2007–2008 and consolidating itself as an established research program, Post-Keynesian economics remains under-represented within publications on the history of economics. When compared to other traditional heterodox approaches such as Marxist, Institutionalist, and Austrian economics, Post-Keynesian economics falls behind considerably, contradicting the Post-Keynesian appreciation for the history of the discipline. This article explores some reasons behind this detachment by considering two main factors: first, the recent disciplinary and institutional changes experienced by the history of economics in the last ten years; and, second, the recent ‘maturing state’ of Post-Keynesian economics and its unique treatment of the history of economic thought. The article concludes by suggesting a new research agenda for Post-Keynesianism, making use of the ‘applied’ turn proposed by the recent history of economic thought as one of the strategies for Post-Keynesians to engage with the economics discipline.

2

Trautwein, Hans-Michael. "Leijonhufvud on New Keynesian Economics and the economics of Keynes." Oxford Economic Papers 72, no. 4 (May 18, 2020): 923–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaa013.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract The theme that Axel Leijonhufvud has extracted from the economics of Keynes is the potential for failures in the intertemporal coordination of activities in complex market systems. In his path-breaking book of 1968, he attacked standard Keynesian Economics for its view on frictions, which reduces the causes of macroeconomic pathologies to nominal rigidities. With the rise of DSGE-based New Keynesian Economics, Leijonhufvud has pointed out that ‘standard macroeconomics’ is still stuck in the frictions view. Referring to recent financial crises, he considers DSGE modelling to be hopelessly inadequate for dealing with such macroeconomic instability. Yet, the financial frictions literature in New Keynesian Economics claims to have found ways to incorporate financial crises into DSGE frameworks. The article describes continuity and change in Leijonhufvud’s critique of Old and New Keynesians, and assesses contrary claims to progress made in the DSGE world.

3

Tobin, James. "Price Flexibility and Output Stability: An Old Keynesian View." Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, no. 1 (February 1, 1993): 45–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.1.45.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In this symposium I shall play the role in which I was cast, the unreconstructed old Keynesian. Considering the alternatives, I do not mind being billed as a Keynesian, an old Keynesian at that. But old Keynesians come in several varieties, and I speak for no one but myself. Nor do I defend the literal text of The General Theory. Several generations of economists have criticized, amended, and elaborated that seminal work. I shall argue for the validity of the major propositions that distinguish Keynesian macroeconomics from old or new classical macroeconomics.

4

GREENWALD, B., and J. E. STIGLITZ. "KEYNESIAN, NEW KEYNESIAN AND NEW CLASSICAL ECONOMICS." Oxford Economic Papers 39, no. 1 (March 1987): 119–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041773.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Posada Posada, Carlos Esteban. "Expectativas de inflación y tasa de interés: aspectos teóricos." Lecturas de Economía, no. 20 (March 10, 2011): 37–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.17533/udea.le.n20a7997.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

• Resumen: ¿Qué efectos tienen los cambios en las expectativas de inflación sobre las tasas de interés, nominales y reales? ¿Cómo se producen esos efectos? Existen dos grandes respuestas teóricas antagónicas a las preguntas anteriores: la clásica y la keynesiana. En este artículo se resumen dichas respuestas y se exponen sus alcances y limitaciones. A partir de este resumen se construye un modelo "cuasi-keynesiano", pero que arroja una conclusión que coincide con la respuesta clásica al respecto: las expectativas de inflación tienden a quedar incorporadas en la tasa nominal de interés sin modificar de manera permanente la tasa real de interés. En países o épocas con alteraciones significativas de las expectativas de inflación esta conclusión puede ser la correcta, no así la keynesiana. • Abstract: This question of just how expectations of inflation influence the real and the nominal rate of interest have been addressed from both a Keynesian and a classical perspective. This paper presents a critical summary of these arguments in the context of a quasi-keynesian model. Its finding is however is essentially classical – that inflationary expectations will be incorporated into the nominal rate of interest without having any permanent effect on the real rate.

6

Dimand, Robert W. "The much-exaggerated death of Keynesian economics." Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 36–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.04.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The supposed death of Keynesian economics has long been debated. This paper revisits the four central Keynesian propositions identified by Tobin's 1977 paper, ‘How dead is Keynes?’, to argue, in the light of the global financial crisis and the Great Recession, that Keynesian economics remains alive and relevant as useful economics for understanding the economy in a world of fundamental uncertainty, with particular reference to chapter 19 of Keynes's General Theory concerning economic instability and wage and price flexibility.

7

Harcourt, G. C., and Stephen Rousseas. "Post Keynesian Monetary Economics." Economic Journal 97, no. 387 (September 1987): 756. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2232940.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Niggle, Christopher J., and Stephen Rousseas. "Post Keynesian Monetary Economics." Southern Economic Journal 54, no. 3 (January 1988): 807. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1059042.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Sesselmeier, Werner, Corrado Benassi, Allesandra Chirco, and Caterina Colombo. "The New Keynesian Economics." Southern Economic Journal 63, no. 1 (July 1996): 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1061334.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Cottrell, Allin. "Post-Keynesian monetary economics." Cambridge Journal of Economics 18, no. 6 (December 1994): 587–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035292.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Biewener, C. "Post-Keynesian Monetary Economics." History of Political Economy 20, no. 1 (March 1, 1988): 145–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-20-1-145.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Gedeon, Shirley J. "Post Keynesian Monetary Economics." Journal of Economic Issues 21, no. 1 (March 1987): 538–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1987.11504642.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Bofinger, Peter. "Reviving Keynesianism: the modelling of the financial system makes the difference." Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 61–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.06.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Keynesian economics is not dead. Instead, it is in a similar condition to Sleeping Beauty after she pricked her finger on the spindle. A large hedge of thorns has been laid over the original Keynesian building so that it is hardly recognizable today. Keynesian economics has suffered from a failure to sufficiently identify the core of the Keynesian revolution. This paper argues that the core concerns the distinction between real and monetary exchange economies, and that a proper understanding of money's role requires identifying the mechanisms of the financial system. Doing so reveals the fundamental incompatibility between real and monetary analysis.

14

Beltratti, Andrea. "L’economia dell’equilibrio." Journal of Public Finance and Public Choice 3, no. 2 (October 1, 1985): 97–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/251569298x15668907117101.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract The new classical macroeconomists have widely criticized Keynesian economics during the last fifteen years; most of all, on the basis of a lack of microfoundations to Keynesian models and theories.The rational expectations hypothesis is necessary but not sufficient, by itself, to deny the policy effectiveness results advocated by Keynesian theorists; the most important hypothesis, and the most characteristic feature, of the new classical school is continuous market-clearing on each market. Rational expectations can be used also in disequilibrium models, and can even strengthen policy effectiveness results.This paper considers some interesting points made by the equilibrium theorists, such as the Lucas critique and the equilibrium business cycles, and also tries to show some limits of the models.The debate between Keynesians and New Classical Economists is very useful; both schools are able to benefit from the valuable insights of the last few years, which allow theorists to hope in a substantial improvement of macroeconomics as a science and as a tool to understand the working of today’s economic systems.

15

Caldentey, Esteban Pérez, Nathan Perry, and Matías Vernengo. "The return of Keynes and the Phillips curve in Latin America: evidence from four countries." Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 84–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.07.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Robert Rowthorn, in his Godley–Tobin Lecture, suggests that Keynesian policies have again been incorporated by the mainstream of the profession, and the old Phillips relation is again relevant. In other words, there seems to be a persistent trade-off between inflation, wage inflation in particular, and unemployment rates, properly measured, which would create the space for Keynesian policies. This paper discusses the return of Keynesian economics, in particular in Latin American economies. While it is true that Keynesian economics made a comeback in terms of policy in Latin America, as in other parts of the world, in the aftermath of the global financial crisis of 2008–2009, it is also true that the Keynesian moment was relatively weak and short-lived. The evidence in Latin America for a Phillips curve is relatively weak, and suggests that inflation is often cost-push rather than demand-pull, which could be understood to suggest that there is space for expansionary fiscal policy, at least in the absence of an external constraint. The authors remain skeptical about the return of Keynesian economics at the theoretical level, and the possibilities for Keynesian policies in the region.

16

Lavoie, Marc. "Thoughts on post-keynesian economics and emerging economies." Cuadernos de Economía 39, no. 80 (June 1, 2020): 417–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/cuad.econ.v39n80.85240.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Pressman, Steven. "Economic Power, the State, and Post-Keynesian Economics." International Journal of Political Economy 35, no. 4 (December 1, 2006): 67–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/ijp0891-1916350404.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

FISUNOGLU, Mahir, and Bilge TAN. "KEYNES'S REVOLUTION AND KEYNESIAN ECONOMICS." Ekonomik Yaklasim 20, no. 70 (2009): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/ey.10680.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Snowdon, Brian, and G. K. Shaw. "Keynesian Economics: The Permanent Revolution." Southern Economic Journal 56, no. 1 (July 1989): 278. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1059093.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Zannoni, Diane, and Paul Davidson. "Controversies in Post Keynesian Economics." Southern Economic Journal 59, no. 2 (October 1992): 351. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060561.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

21

Arestis, P. "Post-Keynesian economics: towards coherence." Cambridge Journal of Economics 20, no. 1 (January 1, 1996): 111–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013604.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

22

Halevi, Joseph. "Marxism and Post-Keynesian Economics." History of Economics Review 18, no. 1 (January 1992): 46–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10370196.1992.11733115.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

23

Lavoie, Marc. "Perspectives for Post-Keynesian Economics." Review of Political Economy 24, no. 2 (April 2012): 321–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2012.664356.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

24

Bateman, B. W. "An Encyclopedia of Keynesian Economics." History of Political Economy 31, no. 3 (September 1, 1999): 601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00182702-31-3-601.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Sarı Aksakal, Betül. "World Bank and Keynesian Economics." Business and Economics Research Journal 10, no. 1 (January 30, 2020): 77–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.156.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

26

Petri, Fabio. "Post-Keynesian Economics: New Foundations." Review of Political Economy 27, no. 3 (July 3, 2015): 457–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2015.1067031.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Randall Wray, L. "Controversies in Post Keynesian Economics." Journal of Economic Issues 26, no. 3 (September 1992): 929–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1992.11505344.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Yoshida, Masaaki. "Keynesian Economics—An Evolutionist Manifesto." Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review 1, no. 1 (November 2004): 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.14441/eier.1.49.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

29

Hiç, Özlen. "Evolution of New Keynesian Economics." Procedia Computer Science 158 (2019): 1025–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.144.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

30

Lastrapes, William D. "New Keynesian economics, volume 2." International Review of Economics & Finance 2, no. 4 (January 1993): 425–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/1059-0560(93)90015-i.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

31

Mankiw, N. Gregory. "Symposium on Keynesian Economics Today." Journal of Economic Perspectives 7, no. 1 (February 1, 1993): 3–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.1.3.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

32

Mankiw, N. Gregory. "The reincarnation of Keynesian economics." European Economic Review 36, no. 2-3 (April 1992): 559–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(92)90113-b.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

33

Cross, Rod. "Hysteresis and Post Keynesian Economics." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 15, no. 3 (March 1993): 305–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1993.11489945.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

McKenna, Edward J., and Diane C. Zannoni. "Post Keynesian Economics and Nihilism." Journal of Post Keynesian Economics 23, no. 2 (December 2000): 331–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01603477.2000.11490284.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Fontana, Giuseppe. "Introduction to Post-Keynesian Economics." Eastern Economic Journal 34, no. 1 (December 17, 2007): 131–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050013.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

36

Brown, William S. "Keynesian Economics: The Permanent Revolution." Journal of Economic Issues 24, no. 1 (March 1990): 306–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1990.11505024.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

37

Galí, Jordi. "The State of New Keynesian Economics: A Partial Assessment." Journal of Economic Perspectives 32, no. 3 (August 1, 2018): 87–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.87.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In August 2007, when the first signs emerged of what would come to be the most damaging global financial crisis since the Great Depression, the New Keynesian paradigm was dominant in macroeconomics. Ten years later, tons of ammunition has been fired against modern macroeconomics in general, and against dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models that build on the New Keynesian framework in particular. Those criticisms notwithstanding, the New Keynesian model arguably remains the dominant framework in the classroom, in academic research, and in policy modeling. In fact, one can argue that over the past ten years the scope of New Keynesian economics has kept widening, by encompassing a growing number of phenomena that are analyzed using its basic framework, as well as by addressing some of the criticisms raised against it. The present paper takes stock of the state of New Keynesian economics by reviewing some of its main insights and by providing an overview of some recent developments. In particular, I discuss some recent work on two very active research programs: the implications of the zero lower bound on nominal interest rates and the interaction of monetary policy and household heterogeneity. Finally, I discuss what I view as some of the main shortcomings of the New Keynesian model and possible areas for future research.

38

Backhouse, Roger E. "Economic theory in an imperfect world: Frank Hahn, general equilibrium, and Keynesian economics." Oxford Economic Papers 72, no. 4 (May 3, 2020): 1091–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaa005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract Frank Hahn was both a Keynesian economist, active in policy debates, and an economic theorist. Placing his work in the context of attempts to make theoretical sense of Keynesian economics, this article explores the way Hahn used abstract general equilibrium theory to draw conclusions relevant to policy in an ‘imperfect’ world that does not conform to the assumptions made in the theory. Hahn’s rigorous approach to theorizing as the route to understanding is assessed in relation to the different approaches of Robert Lucas, Milton Friedman, Paul Samuelson and Axel Leijonhufvud.

39

Day, Richard H., and Wayne Shafer. "Keynesian chaos." Journal of Macroeconomics 7, no. 2 (March 1985): 277–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0164-0704(85)80012-4.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Day, Richard H., and Wayne Shafer. "Keynesian Chaos." Journal of Macroeconomics 7, no. 3 (June 1985): 277–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0164-0704(85)90072-2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Fazzari, Steven M. "Was Keynesian economics ever dead? If so, has it been resurrected?" Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 46–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.05.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article reflects on rising interest in Keynesian macroeconomics in the aftermath of the Great Recession. I identify aspects of Keynesian thinking that never were completely banished from the mainstream as well as threads of Keynesian macroeconomics that have become more influential since the crisis. However, the way most mainstream analysis continues to invoke the zero lower bound for short-term interest rates and the concept of the ‘natural’ rate of interest implies that any Keynesian resurrection outside of heterodoxy remains incomplete. The future may bring broader recognition of how demand leads economic growth and of ways in which the demand side leads the supply side beyond the typical textbook ‘short run.’

42

Hannonen, Marko. "Urban Housing Policy Considerations: Perspectives from the Finnish Housing Market." Journal of Heterodox Economics 1, no. 2 (December 1, 2014): 114–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jheec-2015-0007.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract It is very difficult to study phenomena in housing markets using conventional so-called neoclassical economics. The core problem stems from the highly unrealistic assumptions of neoclassical economics, such as homogeneous products, equilibrium markets, ceteris paribus clauses, deterministic and linear systems, rationality of economic agents, and the utility maximization principle. New Keynesian economics appears to be a more fruitful approach to housing markets since it presumes that products are differentiated, markets are in disequilibrium state and there exists imperfect competition in a marketplace. Furthermore, new Keynesian economics utilizes the concept of bounded rationality, which is a more realistic description of the actual behavior of economic agents than the theoretical notion of rationality in neoclassical economics.

43

WILSON, MATTHEW. "Institutionalism, critical realism, and the critique of mainstream economics." Journal of Institutional Economics 1, no. 2 (December 2005): 217–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744137405000160.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Critical realists have gained substantial support within post-Keynesian and Marxian research communities, and it is likely that critical realism's influence in institutionalism will grow in coming years. Post-Keynesians and Marxists have had ongoing discussions regarding the strengths and weakness of critical realism. Institutionalists should have a similar discussion. This paper addresses a key feature of the critical realist program: its critique of mainstream economics. In particular, it criticizes the use by critical realists of the concept of closure, and argues that critical realism is misleading in its identification of the ontology of mainstream economics as Humean. The purpose of the paper is to promote critical discussion regarding the role of critical realism in institutionalism.

44

Rowthorn, Robert. "The Godley-Tobin lecture." Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.01.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This paper surveys some of the main developments in macroeconomics since the anti-Keynesian counter-revolution 40 years ago. It covers both mainstream and heterodox economics. Amongst the topics discussed are: New Keynesian economics, Modern Monetary Theory, expansionary fiscal contraction, unconventional monetary policy, the Phillips curve, hysteresis, and heterodox theories of growth and distribution. The conclusion is that Keynesian economics is alive and well, and that there has been a degree of convergence between heterodox and mainstream economics.

45

Eichengreen, Barry. "Keynesian economics: can it return if it never died?" Review of Keynesian Economics 8, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 23–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/roke.2020.01.03.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Appreciation of the Keynesian synthesis was enhanced by the events of the last decade. The global financial crisis highlighted the fragility of financial markets and the capriciousness of animal spirits. The depth of the downturn pointed to the value of not just automatic stabilizers but also discretionary fiscal policy as tools of macroeconomic management. Keynesian models and not their New Classical challengers provided the practical analytical framework for policy design. Models of the anti-Keynesian effects of fiscal consolidation received little support from actual consolidation experience. The secular-stagnation debate that followed the crisis lent legitimacy to the view that policy-makers with fiscal space were wise to use it.

46

Dugger, William M., Philip Arestis, and Victoria Chick. "Recent Developments in Post-Keynesian Economics." Southern Economic Journal 60, no. 2 (October 1993): 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060102.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

47

Froyen, Richard, and Robin Marris. "Reconstructing Keynesian Economics with Imperfect Competition." Southern Economic Journal 60, no. 2 (October 1993): 515. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1060104.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

48

Fitzgibbons, Athol. "The Logic of Post Keynesian Economics." History of Economics Review 25, no. 1 (January 1996): 72–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10370196.1996.11733218.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

49

Rochon, Louis-Philippe, and Sergio Rossi. "Central Banking and Post-Keynesian Economics." Review of Political Economy 19, no. 4 (October 2007): 539–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538250701622402.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Heap, Shaun Hargreaves. "Towards a post-Keynesian Welfare economics." Review of Political Economy 1, no. 2 (July 1989): 144–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09538258900000013.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.