Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Jugements de légitimité"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Зміст
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Jugements de légitimité".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Jugements de légitimité"
Roux, Dominique, Mariem El Euch Maalej, and Julie Boyer. "Les jugements critiques du luxe : une approche par la légitimité." Décisions Marketing 82 (June 24, 2016): 33–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.7193/dm.082.33.52.
Повний текст джерелаLordon, Frédéric. "La légitimité au regard du fait monétaire." Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 55, no. 6 (December 2000): 1343–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.3406/ahess.2000.279920.
Повний текст джерелаDubet, François, Marie Duru-Bellat, and Antoine Vérétout. "Emprise des diplômes, jugements de justice et cohésion sociale." Sociologie et sociétés 43, no. 1 (May 25, 2011): 225–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1003538ar.
Повний текст джерелаSchwarz, Alexander. "Préface." Cahiers du Centre de Linguistique et des Sciences du Langage, no. 21 (April 9, 2022): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.26034/la.cdclsl.2006.1456.
Повний текст джерелаThireau, Isabelle, and Linshan Hua. "Jugements de légitimité et d'illégitimité : la vie normative dans les nouveaux lieux de travail en Chine." Revue française de sociologie 46, no. 3 (2005): 529. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rfs.463.0529.
Повний текст джерелаHelly, Denise, Valérie Scott, Marianne Hardy-Dussault, and Julie Ranger. "Droit familial et parties « musulmanes » : des cas de kafálah au Québec, 1997-2009." McGill Law Journal 56, no. 4 (September 13, 2011): 1057–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1005852ar.
Повний текст джерелаTrimble, Linda, Natasja Treiberg, and Sue Girard1. "Kim-Speak : l’effet du genre dans la médiatisation de Kim Campbell durant la campagne pour l’élection nationale canadienne de 1993." Articles 23, no. 1 (September 24, 2010): 29–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/044421ar.
Повний текст джерелаMatthews, J. Scott. "The Political Foundations of Support for Same-Sex Marriage in Canada." Canadian Journal of Political Science 38, no. 4 (December 2005): 841–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008423905040485.
Повний текст джерелаDumas, Christel, and Stephanos Anastasiadis. "Mécanismes calculatifs et discursifs dans les notations ESG." Revue Française de Gestion 47, no. 300 (October 2021): 101–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3166/rfg.2021.00581.
Повний текст джерелаBernatchez, Stéphane. "La controverse doctrinale sur la légitimité du juge constitutionnel canadien." Articles 19, no. 2-3 (November 19, 2008): 89–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/040226ar.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Jugements de légitimité"
Huynh, Chang-Wa. "A Moralized View of Corporate Purpose : the Mediating Role of Legitimacy Judgments." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Jouy-en Josas, HEC, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023EHEC0003.
Повний текст джерелаPurpose-driven companies propose to reintroduce morality at the most foundational level of organizations and suggest new articulation between businesses, societies and the environment. This dissertation examines the consequences of the moral dimension that a corporate purpose induces. I highlight that the moral dimension of a corporate purpose shapes firm members’ legitimacy judgments on the purpose-driven company. In turn, firm members’ legitimacy judgments impact firm performance
Correia, Mario. "Les mobiles des trajectoires individuelles : du jugement sur la justice à l'acquisition d'une nouvelle légitimité sociale." Paris 1, 1994. http://www.theses.fr/1994PA01A015.
Повний текст джерелаReix, Marie. "Le motif légitime en droit pénal : contribution a la théorie générale de la justification." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012BOR40055/document.
Повний текст джерелаIn many legal disciplines, the legitimate reason is a model of justification of acts. The legitimate reason prevents the enforcement of the law, either by creating a right or by exempting someone from a duty. Despite an unprecedented boom, criminal law is hesitant about this vague notion. In order to justify judges' assessment margin, the legitimate reason is commonly considered as a motive. This accentuates the confusion between objective and subjective causes of irresponsibility. The formal approach of the justificatory process is inadequate, making the process increasingly biased. The analysis of the legitimate reason requires a re-examination of the justification theory using a solid understanding of unlawfulness which can help standardize its implementation. The study of the legitimate reason’s justificatory function allows a better understanding of the flexibility of its implementation requirements. The legitimate reason reverses the presumption of unlawfulness on which liability is based. The cause of liability is conditioned by the value judgment made about the offence, whereas the judgment of the reality of the offender’s intention is the condition of his imputation. The legitimate reason stems from circumstances that are external to the offence, and which enable the review of its lawfulness. The objective nature of the legitimate reason is aligned with the fact that it exempts from liability in rem and not in personam. However, the requirements for its application seem exceptional to the common law of justification in two regards: its broad criteria and its narrow field. It is limited to offences of abstract risk that protect secondary values for which the presumption of unlawfulness is artificial. The defendant must prove the legitimacy of his act whereas the abstract legitimacy of the suppression is unconfirmed. The expansion of this dispensatory field of suppression reveals an inadequate control of its abstract necessity. In any case, bringing up legitimate reason is useless as it is implicit to any offence and is considered as a general model of justification. It leaves the judge free to assess the necessity of the penalty on a case by case basis, as the law, by nature, cannot resolve all value conflicts. The post facto justification of socially necessary offences or even trivial offences reinforces the authority of the law by ensuring an enforcement that is aligned with the law's aim of protecting values
Tisserand, Sébastien. "De la légitimité du recours à l'action déclaratoire dans les litiges du commerce international." Thèse, 2002. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/2765.
Повний текст джерелаAs its title indicates, this thesis deals with the legitimacy of the recourse to the declaratory action in Quebec private international law. The purpose of the declaratory action, whether it is introduced by declaration or on motion, is to allow the court to rule on the existence or the inexistence of rights and obligations of the parties. Although very old, the declaratory action was seldom used in Quebec until the advent in 1966 of the declaratory judgment on motion in our Code of civil procedure. Today, this action is largely used in public law as a means by which the Superior Court exercise its jurisdiction, but also in the context of private international law as a strategy of defence, or sometimes of attack, in an international procedure. Basically, the aim of this action is to offer a legal mechanism of protection of an individual's rights when other recourses are not available or accessible, and to allow an effective recourse out of the traditional framework of the ordinary procedure. Consequently, it seems contestable to use the declaratory judgment on motion to block the differently applicable ordinary procedures in private international law. The object of this study is thus to show that although recourse to the declaratory action is legitimate in private international law, its strategic current use, in forecast or present ordinary proceedings brought in another jurisdiction, appears not easily justifiable. Thus, the first part of this thesis is devoted to the study of legitimacy of the declaratory action in Quebec private international law, and the second part deals with the effects of a foreign declaratory judgment on motion on the international procedure in Quebec.